Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Similar documents
New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

Questions and Answers about Saturated Buffers for the Midwest

What Every CCA Should Know About Drainage

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

A Toolbox for Water Management. By Nick Schneider, Winnebago County Ag Agent and Doral Kemper

Nutrient Reduction Strategy and Best Management Practices

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project

Gulf Hypoxia and the Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

( ) or 811 or mo1call.com

Innovative Agricultural Practices to Mitigate Groundwater Nutrient Contamination

Strategies for nitrate reduction: The Cedar River Case Study

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

Identification of Suitable Sites for Constructed Wetlands to Remove Nitrate

Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed

Managing Water to Increase Resiliency of Drained Agricultural Landscapes. Jane Frankenberger Agricultural & Biological Engineering Purdue University

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Environmental Concerns in Midwest Agricultural Landscapes. Roberta Parry US EPA Office of Water June 25, 2014

Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Cropland. Renee Hancock, NE NRCS State Water Quality Specialist

This is the site setup with the bioreactor located at the west side and the wetlands at the east side. The area draining to the bioreactor via the

AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE

WATERSHEDS. City Council Workshop August 21, 2018

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative

Report for 2001SD1941B: Alternative Conservation Practices to Improve Soil and Water Quality

ANALYSIS OF CCRP S RECORD BREAKING ENROLLMENT NSAC SPECIAL REPORTS

IOWA WATER QUALITY INITIATIVE. from strategy to implementation

NRCS Water Quality Practices

WELCOME TO THE JANUARY EDITION OF THE 2016 M&R SEMINAR SERIES

Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients

MARB River Basin. Hypoxia Zone. Executive Director

Summary of Water Monitoring Data

Cover Crops, Wetlands, and Conservation Drainage

Public Notice ISSUED: 11 February 2019 EXPIRES: 13 March 2019

Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Monarch. Buffer Strips. Habitat Restoration Planning using Riparian

Watershed Response to Water Storage. 8/1/2012 Paul Wymar Scientist Chippewa River Watershed Project

Infiltration Basin Description Applicability

Subsurface Drainage: Principals and Practice. Adapted from presentations by John Panuska and Matt Ruark,, December 2008

AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE

Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension

Subsurface Drains: Principals and Practice

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

NREM 407/507 April 23

Best Management Practices for Agricultural Pesticide Runoff. Part II. Aniela Burant, PhD. March 20, 2018

Controlled drainage - a SCIEN drainage technology

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

Update on Multipurpose Drainage and the Plan to Move Forward. Chuck Brandel, PE I+S Group Joe Mutschler, PE Faribault County John Jaschke BWSR

BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Sarah A. White, Ph.D. 25 Oct 2016

Nitrate-N Loss Reduction: Scale of In- Field and Edge-of-Field Practice Implementation to Reach Water Quality Goals

IA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft

Drainage Water Management and Nutrient Control Through Agricultural Field Drainage

Adaptive Watershed Management for Control of Nutrient Loss in the Mackinaw River Watershed. Krista Kirkham and Maria Lemke The Nature Conservancy

HYPOXIA ACTION PLAN: WHAT CAN MIDWEST AGRICULTURE DO? Dennis McKenna Illinois Department of Agriculture

ENGINEER S REPORT MAIN TILE IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 131 WRIGHT COUNTY

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590

LANDOWNER S SURVEY: WHAT S THE RISK TO YOUR WATER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DES PLAINES RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN WHY A WATERSHED-BASED PLAN? WHAT IS A WATERSHED?

Economic Benefits of Tile Drainage, Conservation Drainage, Sub-irrigation

Nutrient and Sediment Loss Reduction by Perennial & Cover Crops

Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies

Chapter 10: Economics of Nutrient Management and Environmental Issues

Economics of Implementing Two-stage Channels

LAND APPLICATION METHODS - SETBACKS

Managing Agricultural Drainage Systems For Water Quality Improvements in the Midwest. Brown, Fausey et al.

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

2015 State Envirothon

Edge-of-Field Monitoring

4Rs for Healthy Soils & Healthy Waters

Ag Drainage Design Protocols and Current Technology

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

A Presentation of the 2013 Drainage Research Forum. November 14, 2013 SDSU Extension Regional Center Sioux Falls, SD

Kapil Arora, Carl Pederson, Dr. Matt Helmers, and Dr. Ramesh Kanwar. DATE SUBMITTED: October 23, INDUSTRY SUMMARY

The Relationship between the Properties and Features of Wetland Soils and the Adjacent Uplands

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

Drainage Water Recycling Managing Water for Tomorrow s Agriculture

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Nitrogen (N) affects in-state and downstream waters in three primary ways:

Water Conservation Planning: How a Systems Approach to Irrigation Promotes Sustainable Water Use

Iowa Bioreactor Demonstration Project

Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment

MANURE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOSS WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND ON-FARM PHOSPHORUS INDEX IMPLEMENTATION. AN OVERVIEW OF ONGOING RESEARCH

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

Agricultural Drainage Management Strategies to Improve Water Quality.

EXTENSION Know how. Know now. EC195 (Revised August 2012)

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection

CHAPTER 7 PHYSICAL INVENTORY OF THE CITY

Stream Buffer: Kidneys of the Watershed?

orking Trees for Water Quality

Adoption & Implementation of Drainage Water Management Technical Brief

Land Application of Manure

For the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

Transcription:

Saturated Buffer To intercept tile drainage prior to discharging to surface waters and redistribute the water laterally in the soil profile of the streamside buffer. Subsurface drainage, also known as tile drainage, has been crucial for improving agricultural production throughout the Midwest. An estimated 51,000,000 acres in the Midwest have a form of artificial subsurface drainage. Tile drainage creates an environment for consistent crop yields by reducing the risk of excessive water stress, promoting root development, increasing infiltration and reducing soil compaction. Along with yield gains, tile drainage is known to decrease surface runoff and associated sediment and phosphorus (P) losses. Surface runoff is reduced by increasing the amount of available soil pore space, which increases infiltration. The drawback to tile drainage is that it increases the delivery of water soluble nutrients such as nitrate-n and water-soluble phosphorus. Subsurface drainage has been linked to hypoxia outbreaks in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as increasing nitrate-n concentrations in surface water used for municipal drinking supplies. Nitrate-N concentrations can exceed the 10 ppm drinking water standard, requiring treatment to meet the standard. In the 31-state Mississippi River Basin, nine states Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi contribute nearly 75 percent of the nitrogen (N) and P to the Gulf. 2 Limited data is available, but there was a 55 percent nitrate-n reduction over a two-year period on the saturated buffer on Bear Creek in Story County, Iowa. Currently the practice is being installed on streams and ditches that are not deeply incised less than 8 foot streambanks in order to prevent potential bank collapse. A dewatering zone may be used with incised streambanks. The buffer needs to be at least 45 feet wide with 500 lateral feet available, but vary based on soil types. Ideal sites would have relief entering the filter strip from the crop field as to not back water into the cropped area. Finally, saturated buffers are not recommended in areas with gravel or sandy soils. Costs are relatively low if the buffer already exists and range from $2,000-$4,000. There is no potential yield increase so there are no current economic benefits to the farmer. Saturated buffers also have more specific site requirements than a bioreactor. 7 All photos courtesy of Bruce Voigts Subsurface Drainage

Denitrifying Bioreactors The purpose for this practice is to redirect a portion of tile flow through an underground pit of woodchips to remove nitrate-n prior to discharging to surface waters. Bioreactors also have shown the ability to remove phosphorus, chemical constituents and bacteria from subsurface drainage water. Photo courtesy of Bruce Voigts Nitrate reduction varies with annual precipitation patterns, but current bioreactor N load reduction efficiency ranges from 15-60 percent. Nitrate reduction rates increase as subsurface drainage water temperatures rise in the summer months. Years in which subsurface drainage flow volumes are dominated in the cooler winter and spring months, nitrate reductions are on the lower end of the range. Bioreactor efficiency is maximized in years with sustained tile flow in the warmer months of June, July and August. Bioreactors are adaptable to many landscape positions, but are typically located at the field edge near the tile outlets to a stream or other surface water body. Tiles treated by bioreactors are generally 6-10 inch diameter mains that drain 30-100 acres. Smaller drainage areas usually are not worth the expense of a bioreactor. 51,000,000 ACRES in the Midwest have a form of artificial agricultural drainage PRACTICE A typical bioreactor installation will cost $8,000-$12,000 but will vary with size. There is no direct benefit to the farmer as bioreactors do not influence yield, and they require seasonal management. PRACTICE APPLIES Flat fields with 0.5%-1% Drainage Water grades. Can be installed on Management new tile or retrofitted to existing systems. Shallow Drainage Bioreactor New tile installations, or when splitting lateral spacing. 30 100 acre drainage areas with 6" 10" tiles. Rarely recommended for smaller drainages. NITROGEN REMOVAL %* 33 (32) 32 (15) Difficult to retrofit unless previous tile was installed along field contours. Requires closer lateral spacing, increasing the cost compared to conventional. No economic benefit 43 (21) Saturated Buffer Non-incised channel and 45 ft. buffer minimum. 55 Constructed Wetlands 0.5%-2% wetland to drainage area and minimum 500 acre drainage area. 52 and requires periodic management. Site specific and minimal performance data. Large footprint and design time. *Reduction percentages based upon the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy. 6 *not to scale 3

Courtesy of Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) Drainage Water Management (DWM) To manage the water table with control structures to reduce drainage during periods when it is not needed. Water may be stored in the soil profile and made available to the crop during portions of the year when water is scarce. There has been a reported 18-75 percent total flow and nitrate-n reduction depending on system design, location, soil and site conditions (Skaggs et al. 2012). DWM nitrate-n load reductions are a result of reduced flow volumes and not concentration reductions. Reduced drainage flow volumes result from an increase in evapotranspiration, horizontal seepage and surface runoff. Shallow Subsurface Drainage Courtesy of USDA-NRCS Fields suited for DWM generally have areas with slopes of 0.5-1 percent or less. Fields with slopes up to 2 percent can feasibly use DWM but costs increase with slope. New tile systems can be installed with laterals following the elevation contours in order to make them more cost effective to retrofit if drainage water management structures are to be installed in the future. Management Schedule Cooke et al. (2008) estimated the cost differential between conventional and controlled drainage at $49/acre. Controlled drainage ranged from $20$89/acre. Annualized cost for nitrate-n removal with DWM ranges from $3.20-$4.52 per pound of N removed for retrofitted systems on flat fields and as high as $13.89-$20.28 per pound of N removed for new systems with complex, undulating fields. There is a limited amount of land that matches the slope requirements and has not had tile previously installed. Existing tile systems may be difficult to retrofit for DWM purposes and all DWM requires seasonal management. 4 Shallow drainage is intended to reduce flow volume by reducing tile depth. Typical subsurface drainage depth in the Midwest is 4 feet, but shallow drainage depth is 3 feet, thereby reducing the drainable soil volume by 25 percent. Literature shows an average nitrate-n reduction of 32 percent. Similar to drainage water management, shallow drainage does not reduce nitrate-n concentration in tile water but reduces the amount of tile flow, which reduces nitrate load. Shallow tile drainage can be applied anywhere a new tile system is being installed, or when splitting existing tile spacing, such as transitioning from 100 foot spacing down to 50 foot spacing. Shallow drainage does not require any annual management. Less distance is required between shallow tile depths and wetlands, and therefore shallow drainage can better manage the water table closer to wetlands. To obtain the same drainage coefficient and yield benefits as conventional drainage, narrower tile spacing is needed. For example, in a southwest Minnesota field study with silty clay loam/ clay loam soils, tile spacing needed to be reduced from 80 feet to 60 feet in order to obtain the same half-inch drainage coefficient. The reduction in lateral spacing can increase the costs of tile installation by 25 percent or more. Shallow subsurface drainage is more expensive than conventional drainage as 25-33 percent more material is needed to install the narrowly spaced laterals compared to conventional drainage. 5

Constructed Wetlands Wetlands are capable of performing multiple ecosystem services such as wildlife habitat, nutrient removal and flood storage. Constructed wetlands, or water treatment wetlands, are designed to enhance nutrient removal, specifically N processing. The Natural Resources Conservation Service designed water treatment wetlands to treat effluent from agricultural drainage systems in a shallow vegetated pool. Performance varies based upon the size of wetland relative to its drainage or watershed area, but wetlands have been shown to remove 40-90 percent of incoming nitrate-n. The Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy reports a 52 percent reduction in wetlands in the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. A minimum of 25 percent of the contributing watershed must consist of drained row crop agriculture. The typical wetland size is 2-5 percent of the contributing area. The maximum size of the constructed wetland is 40 acres. A buffer is required around the wetland to prevent sedimentation. The buffer to wetland area must be a minimum of 2:1 and a maximum of 4:1. Constructed wetlands can be enrolled in the continuous CRP program. Producers may receive an annual rental payment for a 10-15 year period, plus one time payments for 50 percent of the costs of the vegetation establishment and 40 percent of practice installation. Also, the area enrolled in the wetland is eligible for an additional incentive payment of 20 percent of the soil rental rate. Land may be required to be taken out of production. iasoybeans.com This material is based upon work supported by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under number 69-3A75-11-190. Any opinions, finding, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Additional funding provided by the Walton Family Foundation via a grant to the Iowa Soybean Association. 8