Selection and Propagation of Highly Graft-Compatible Douglas-fir Rootstocks A Case History

Similar documents
a better christmas tree great lakes christmas tree journal

Tree Shaking Machine Aids Cone Collection in a Douglas-Fir See Orchard

Clonal Christmas Trees

Genetic Selection in Coastal Douglas-fir for Tolerance to Swiss Needle Cast Disease

IS THERE AN INVERSE CORRELATION BETWEEN SEXUAL AND ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN CRYPTOMERIA JAPONICA?

Norway spruce breeding in Sweden is based on clone testing

FROM PROGENY TESTING TO SEED ORCHARD THROUGH MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING. Fan H. Kung, Calvin F. Bey and Theodore H. Mattheiss

Forest Reproductive Material Certification Standards Oregon - Washington Interagency

GRAFT INCOMPATIBILITY IN RADIATA PINE IN NEW ZEALAND

PNW-3 53 March 1980 ESTIMATING MERCHANTABLE VOLUMES OF SECOND GROWTH DOUGLAS-FIR STANDS FROM TOTAL CUBIC VOLUME AND ASSOCIATED STAND CHARACTERISTICS

RESPONSE TO UREA AND AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZATION IN AN 80-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR STAND. by Richard E. Miller. Principal Soil Scientist

THE USE OF VEGETATIVE PROPAGULES IN FOREST GENETICS AND TREE IMPROVEMENT

Analysis of Genetic Variation in 1-, 2-, and 3-year old Eastern White Pine in Incomplete Diallel Cross Experiments

CHERRY PROGENY TESTS 1 /

THE NUCLEUS BREEDING SYSTEM. P.P. Cotterill 1/

COMPARISON OF THE GROWTH OF VEGETATIVE PROPAGULES AND SEEDLINGS OF PINUS RADIATA

NR Study-note 122 AN OUTLINE OF TREE IMPROVEMENT

Introduction Executive Summary

RELATION BETWEEN HEIGHT GROWTH AND FUSIFORM RUST INFECTION IN SLASH PINE 1/ A. E. Squillace, P. A. Layton, and R. E. Goddard

Alaska Extension Review

VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION IN FORESTRY. by J. H. Rediske, senior scientist Forestry Research Center, Weyerhaeuser Co. Centralia, WA 98531

FLOWERING RESPONSE OF JUVENILE SELECTIONS IN LOBLOLLY PINE. L. C. Burris, C. G. Williams and S. D. Douglass 1/

Lecture notes Tree Improvement and Silviculture (SFB 451) B.Sc 2 nd Year 2 nd semester

Limber Pine and Whitebark Pine Recovery in Alberta

The Detection of Good Selfers for Haploid Induction in Douglas-Fir')

SEED ORCHARD CONFERENCE. Bart De Cuyper. About picky trees and stubborn bumble bees. Bart De Cuyper. A New Generation of

GENETIC VARIATION IN ROOTABILITY OF CUTTINGS FROM ONE-YEAR-OLD WESTERN HEMLOCK SEEDLINGS. Frank C. Sorensen and Robert K. Campbell1 ABSTRACT

RAMET SIZE AFFECTS THE TIMING OF FEMALE STROBILUS FORMATION IN A PINUS RADIATA SEED ORCHARD CLONE

Effects of IBA and NAA treatments on rooting Douglas-fir stem cuttings

A review of a successful seed orchard at Cherrylane

UNIFORM SEEDLING DENSITY IS IMPORTANT IN HARDWOOD PROGENY TEST NURSERIES. Charles D. Webb'

Improve Your Future Forest Revenue Stream with Advanced Pine Genetics

STABILITY OF FIELD RESISTANT SLASH PINE TO SELECTED ISOLATES OF FUSIFORM RUST FUNGUS. Calvin F. Bey and Charles H. Walkinshaw1 /

STIMULATION OF FLOWERING IN SWEETGUM. J.B. Jett and George Finger 1/

HOW MUCH GENETIC VARIANCE WILL BE REDUCED THROUGH CLONAL SELECTION? Fan H. Kung

G.S. Foster 1/ and D.V. Shaw 2/

INFLUENCE OF ENDRIN ON

Clonal and Age Differences in the Rooting of Metasequoia glyptostroboides Cuttings

SEED CERTIFICATION AND PROGENY TESTING. Clayton E. Posey, Assistant Professor Department of Forestry Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla.

Estimating Biomass of Shrubs and Forbs in Central Washington Douglas-Fir Stands Craig M. Olson and Robert E. Martin

The Morphology and Behavior of Meiotic Chromosomes of Doriglas-Fir

Change in Area and Ownership of Private Timberland in Western Oregon Between and

Genetically Improved Pines for Reforesting Florida s Timberlands 1

Forest Genetics Council of BC: Seed Planning Structure. Jack Woods Program Manager Forest Genetics Council of BC

Sim 11DmriBIIIm IIBirll IGIBI 11111!11&-IIDJIII NIB'IDIB

USING SEED ORCHARD SEEDS WITH UNKNOWN FATHERS

Dwarf Seedlings from Broomed Douglas-Fir

Breeding Design Considerations for Coastal Douglas-Fir

Discussion paper Scenario analysis for the RPBC genomics programme. David Evison, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury

PROGENY TEST DESIGN AND ANALYSIS. J. P. van Buijtenen

OECD FOREST SEED AND PLANT SCHEME

GENETIC VARIATION IN SURVIVAL OF LONGLEAF PINE. R. E. Goddard and Richard Bryant 1/

Swedish programme for conifer conservation and breeding

Ortet Age and Clonal Effects on Growth and Market Value of Fraser Fir (Abies fraseri) Grafts as Christmas Trees

Pinus ponderosa. Height Growth of Wind-pollinated Pragenielsl) By R. Z. CALLAHAM and. A. A. HASEL^)

GRAFTING INFLUENCES ON EARLY ACORN PRODUCTION IN SWAMP WHITE OAK (Quercus bicolor Willd.)

Breeding of Acacia spp. for timber products and Plant variety registration

OECD FOREST SEED AND PLANT SCHEME

Applicability of Four Regional Volume Tables for Estimating Growth Response to Thinning in Douglas-Fir

PONSE OF A 110-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR STAND TO UREA AND AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZATION

OECD FOREST SEED AND PLANT SCHEME

1982 PROGRESS REPORT for IFA-PNW COOPERATIVE TREE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS

Productivity of red alder in western Oregon and Washington

Alberta, to improve Membership. Primary objectives. provide high quality. shares. The HASOC site is. (image. date ).

Contents. 1 Introduction. 2 Data. 3 Analysis. 4 Equations for Height Growth. 8 Equations for Site Index. 14 Discussion

PRE-VARIETY GERMPLASM CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

Silen Seed Orchard, Christmas Trees and Neighbor Relations. A second generation perspective

Improving Minnesota's White Pine 1

Fertility Variation and its Effect on the Relatedness of Seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis Clonal Seed Orchards

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHARACTERISTICS OF SEEDLINGS AND CLONAL CUTTINGS

GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN 1/ PROGENY TESTS OF BLACK CHERRY PLUS TREES

HERITABILITY CONSTRUCTION FOR PROVENANCE AND FAMILY SELECTION. ABSTRACT.--Concepts and procedures for heritability estimations through th~

Anatomical symptoms of graft incompatibility in Pinus monticola and P. ponderosa

Oriental sweet gum. Liquidambar orientalis. Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use

SILVICULTURE OF PURE, DOUBLE-COHORT STANDS. ESRM 323 Smith, et al. Chpt. 13, 14

27. PROCEDURE FOR MUTATION BREEDING

Evaluating Seedling Quality: The Basics By Diane Haase and Robin Rose, Winter 2004

FILE COPY. How To Reduce Injuries. Stand Management Activities. to Residual Trees During EDITOR'S. Paul E. Aho, Gary Fiddler, Gregory M.

COOLING A DOUGLAS-FIR SEED ORCHARD TO AVOID POLLEN CONTAMINATION. Roy R. Silen, Principal Plant Geneticist and. Gene Keane,1.1 Forestry Technician

Hemlock Sawfly. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 31. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Vacuum Collection of Douglas-Fir Pollen for Supplemental Mass Pollinations

Parental GCA testing: How many crosses per parent?

THE ROLE OF TREE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS FOR EX SITU GENE CON- SERVATION OF COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Control-Pollination of Fraser Fir

Tree breeding. Heidi Dungey, Jana Krajňáková, Craig Ford, Emily Telfer, Jaroslav Klápště & Natalie Graham

Volume and Average Stumpage Price of Selected Species on the National Forests of the Pacific Northwest Region, 1973 to 1984

EVALUATION OF SEED PRODUCTION BY CONE ANALYSIS. R. P. Karrfalt and E. W. Belcher 1/ ABSTRACT

DOUGLAS-FIR CONE GALL MIDGE (Contarinia oregonensis)

"Commercial Tree Crops for Phosphate Mined Lands"

CLONAL SELECTION, PROPAGATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF JUVENILITY OF CHINESE FIR, AND AFFORESTATION WITH MONOCLONAL BLOCKS

Vegetative and Cutting Propagation

West Coast Tree Improvement Programs: a break-even,

Third-Cycle Breeding Strategy for Slash Pine by the Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program

Screening Sitka Spruce for Resistance to Weevil Damage in British Columbia

HARDWOOD TREE IMPROVEMENT - WHERE DO WE STAND. Thomas F. Swofford Southern Region, U.S. Forest Service, Atlanta, Georgia

Ronald C. Wilkinson 9

ROOTING OF MATURE AMERICAN SYCAMORE CUTTINGS. G. Sam Foster and Eyvind Thor¹ /

Douglas-Fir Planting Stock Performance Comparison After the Third Growing Season

- USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH NOTE

Redacted for privacy

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note PNW-376 March 1981 This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Selection and Propagation of Highly Graft-Compatible Douglas-fir Rootstocks A Case History Donald L. Copes Abstract Two populations of Douglas-fir trees were screened for graft compatibility. Two-stage testing procedures were used with either high or low intensity screening in the first step. Of 303 trees, 16 (5 percent) were found to be 90 to 100 percent graft compatible and suitable for seed orchard use as rootstocks. High intensity screening in the first stage was more effective than the low intensity screening in detecting highly compatible trees. Trees proven to be 90 to 100 percent compatible after second stage screening were propagated as rooted cuttings and used as parents in controlled pollinations to produce highly compatible seedling families. Approximately 120,000 cuttings have been gathered from 16 ortets and 212 field-planted ramets during the past 7 years. The future supply of cuttings and control-pollinated seed from these desired trees should be adequate to meet the rootstock requirements of most West Coast tree improvement organizations. Keywords: menziesii. Grafting, rootstocks, Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga Introduction Effective methods for detecting incompatible Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) grafts have been known and used for a number of years (Copes 1967, 1969, 1970, 1978). With these anatomical, phenotypic, and biochemical techniques, it is possible to detect incompatible stock-scion combinations and rogue them from seed orchards at an early age. Replacing incompatible grafts raises costs and delays seed production. Some orchardists have reduced the problem by grafting troublesome scion clones on cuttings of rootstocks which have been anatomically tested and found compatible with the problem clones. This procedure usually requires testing each clone with a different rootstock. A more favorable approach would be to find trees which are highly compatible with most scion genotypes. Such a survey has not been made, and lack of widely compatible rootstocks has hindered the general use of clonal rootstocks. The author is Principal Plant Geneticist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon.

Another promising method of easing the graft-incompatibility problem is to use as seedling rootstock families derived from breeding graft-compatible parents. Studies on inheritance of graft rejection in Douglas-fir indicate primarily additive gene control (Copes 1973). A heritability value of 0.81 suggests that controlled pollinations between highly graft-compatible parents should result in compatible seedling progeny (Copes 1974). Unfortunately, suitable parents have not been identified, so breeding of each tree to produce rootstock has not occurred. The following report describes a search for trees which are highly compatible and can be used to provide branch tips for cuttings or seed and pollen to produce compatible seedling rootstocks. In this study, trees which were 90 to 100 percent graft compatible were identified from populations of 50 and 253 trees. A two-stage method for testing graft-compatibility was used, with both high and low intensity screening as the first stage. Trees found potentially 90 to 100 percent compatible in the first stage were subjected to even more stringent testing in the second-stage. Methods Two juvenile Douglas-fir populations were sampled in 1970. One sample was 253 six-year-old trees at the Beaver Creek Seed Orchard, located 15 miles southwest of Corvallis, Oregon. The other sample consisted of fifty 9-year-old trees growing in a clone bank 6 miles north of Corvallis. Nothing was known about the compatibility of either population. Both samples grew in similar environments and received identical cultural treatments throughout the test. The two populations were selected because the trees were young enough to provide rootable cuttings, yet would soon be old enough to produce seed. The first grafting was done in 1970. Two testing strategies were used in the first stage. The 253-tree population was given the low intensity test. It was divided into 23 sets of 11 trees (fig. 1). The grafting design was similar to a half-diallel mating design; each tree was used either as a scion or a rootstock with the other 10 trees of that set (fig. 2). Previous reciprocal grafting work had shown that it makes no difference in compatibility whether Douglas-fir clones are used as scions or stocks (Copes 1974). A total of 1,265 grafts was made. The high intensity test on the 50-tree sample involved grafting 21 scion clones on all 50 trees, making a total of 1,050 grafts. (The grafting design was similar to a 21-tester mating design) (fig. 1). 2

Graft unions from all first-stage tests were sacrificed at 18 months, microtomed into 25-mm cross sections, stained in safranin-0 and fast green, and examined at 10-100X using a light microscope (Gnose and Copes 1975). Incompatible grafts were detected by the presence of wound-xylem areas in union zones at the start of the 2d year of growth (Copes 1970). Average compatibility was calculated for all 303 trees in the first-stage tests. In 1972, 60 trees which appeared potentially 90 to 100 percent compatible in the first stage of testing were grafted with 26 new scion clones for the second stage of testing. Six trees were from the high-intensity test, 54 from the low-intensity test. The total number of grafts was 1,404 (fig. 1). Unions were sacrificed in 1973 and processed by the same methods as first-stage graft unions. Average compatibility of each tree was calculated. Results of the second stage of testing indicated that 16 trees were 90 to 100 percent compatible. These trees were then used to produce compatible rootstocks by rooting and pollination. 3

Rooting studies on potentially highly compatible trees began in 1972. Cuttings were obtained by clipping current year tips from all first- and second-order lateral branches on the lower 2 m of each ortet. Only the current year's twigs were clipped. The clipping treatment on the lower 2 m resembled the shearing commonly done by growers in shaping Douglas-fir Christmas trees for market (fig. 3). From the 16 trees, 212 ramets were rooted and planted in a rootstock clone bank near Monmouth, Oregon at 1.8-x 3.7-m spacing in January 1974 and 1976. Collecting branch tips for rooting from clone bank ramets was not started until 1978 when they were 2 m tall. Results and Discussion No apparent difference in average compatibility was found between the 50- and 253-tree populations (66 vs. 64 percent, respectively) (table 1). This similarity in compatibility may permit some comparisons of the high- and low-intensity tests used in the first stage, even though different populations were used. 4

Figure 3.--A16-year-old ortet which has been cultivated for 9 years to produce both seed and branch tips for rooted cuttings. A number of trees potentially 90 to 100 percent compatible were found with both strategies. Low-intensity tests, with 10 scion clones per tree, indicated that 54 of the 253 trees (21 percent) were 90 to 100 percent compatible. High-intensity tests, with 21 scions on each tree, indicated that 6 trees of the 50 (12 percent) were potentially 90 to 100 percent compatible (table 1). Second-stage testing of trees found potentially 90 to 100 percent compatible in the first stage revealed that many selections from the low-intensity group were poor choices. Only 11 of the 54 low-intensity selections (20 percent) proved to be 90 to 100 percent compatible in second-stage testing. This 20-percent accuracy compares with the 83 percent accuracy in selecting trees from the high intensity group of 21. Apparent inaccuracy of screening the low-intensity group was also indicated by the low average compatibility (69 percent) of the 54 trees tested, whereas the high intensity selections averaged 88 percent compatibility in second-stage testing(table 1) Efficiency of the high and low intemsity screening strategies was almost identical: 241 and 243 grafts, respectively, were required to discover a single 90-to 100-percent-compatible tree. The half-diallel grafting design used in the low-intensity test reduced the number of required scion/rootstock combinations by 50 percent (from 2,530 to 1,265), i.e., n(n-l)/2 combinations for half diallel vs. n(n-l) for the factorial. If the high-intensity test had used the same technique of grafting (using the same trees as either, or both, scions and rootstocks), only 525, not 1,050, first-stage grafts would have been needed and only 136 grafts would be required to identify each 90-to 100-percent-compatible tree. 5

Table 1 Comparison of high- and low-intensity tests of graft compatibility in Douglas-fir Intensity of sample FIRST-STAGE TESTING Low High Number of trees tested 253 50 Number of scion clones grafted/tree 10 21 Total grafts made 1,265 1,050 Average percent compatibility of all first-stage trees 64 66 Number trees potentially 90 to 100+ percent compatible 54 06 Percent trees found potentially 90 to 100+ percent compatible 21 12 SECOND-STAGE TESTING Number of trees potentially 90 to 100+ percent compatible in stage one 54 06 Number scion clones grafted/tree 26 26 Total grafts made 1,404 156 Average percent compatibility of all trees tested 69 88 Number 90- to 100-percent-compatible trees identified 11 05 Percent trees found 90 to 100 percent compatible 20 83 Percent first-stage trees found 90 to 100 percent compatible 04 10 Average percent compatibility of trees 90 to 100+ percent compatible 97 95 Range in compatibility (percent) 92-100 91-98 Total number grafts needed to correctly identify one 90- to 100-percent-compatible tree 243 241 The results suggest that most Douglas-fir populations contain a number of highly graft-compatible trees. The high intensity first-stage sampling indicated that 10 percent of the population was highly compatible, while the low intensity sampling indicated only 4 percent (table 1). The 10 percent is apparently more accurate since some highly compatible trees were not detected by low intensity tests, due to insufficient sampling, and were therefore excluded from further testing. An organization which, for safety reasons, would like to have at least 10 different rootstock clones in its orchards should test at least 100 trees by the intensive method or 250 trees by the less intensive method described in this study. A better technique would be to combine the accuracy of the high intensity method with the efficiency of the low intensity half-diallel grafting design. A test with the population broken into 26-tree half-diallel sets would capture the benefits of both screening methods. The 16 ortets selected as 90 to 100 percent compatible after second-stage testing have been cultivated to produce both seeds and branch tips for propagation. The first seed from these was produced in 1977 by two 13-year-old ortets. Significant 6

numbers of male buds were lacking at that time. By 1980, the 16- to 19-year-old ortets had grown to an approximate height of 10 m. Seven trees had abundant female buds, but male buds were still sparse. Abundant seed production in the future is indicated by the trees' large crowns (fig. 3). Seed orchard managers have eagerly sought cuttings of the 16 trees to use as rootstocks for their clonal orchards. Approximately 120,000 cuttings have been gathered during the last 7 years from the 16 ortets and 212 rooted ramets of the same clones (table 2). Cuttings were not taken until ramets were at least 2 m tall. Rooting success averaged 50 percent or higher between 1976-79. Three or 4 years of growth after field planting was required for ramets to produce abundant cuttings without adversely affecting the following year's crop. The 212 ramets growing in the rootstock-clone bank will probably produce 50,000 to 100,000 cuttings per year within the next 5 years. Production of cuttings from the ortets shows signs of decreasing. Progressively smaller and weaker cuttings were obtained in 1978, 1979, and 1980, as more vigorous branch growth has been directed into the upper, undipped areas of the crown. It might be possible to reverse this trend by not gathering cuttings for a year or two and by applying fertilizer to stimulate vegetative growth. Removing a major portion of the upper crown would also stimulate growth in the lower crown, but such treatment would be detrimental to seed production. Table 2 Approximate number of cuttings gathered from highly compatible ortets and rooted ramets Year of No. of cuttings 1 collection From 16 ortets From 212 ramets Total 1974 2,000 0 2,000 1975 4,900 0 4,900 1976 6,200 0 6,200 1977 6,500 0 6,500 1978 10,000 20,200 30,200 1979 10,200 21,000 31,200 1980 10,000 29,000 39,000 Totals 49,800 70,200 120,000 1 Rounded to the nearest 100 cuttings. 7

These 16 highly compatible rootstocks are now widely used in clonal seed orchards. Tree improvement organizations on the West Coast root thousands of cuttings each year from them. In addition, control-pollinated seedlings from the same trees have been planted from northern California to northern Washington for evaluation of graft compatibilty. The supply of rootstocks for present and future needs will soon be adequate. New research on compatible rootstocks will focus on continued improvement in overall compatiblity of clonal and seedling lines and on the secondary influence of rootstocks on cone production, tree form, and tree height. Literature Cited Copes, D. L. 1967. A simple method for detecting incompatibility in 2-year-old grafts of Douglas-fir. USDA, For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-70, 8 p. Pac. Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. Copes, Donald 1969. External detection of incompatible grafts. Proc. Int. Plant. Prep. Soc. Ann. Meeting, 1969, 9:97-102. Copes, Donald 1970. Initiation and development of graft incompatibility symptoms in Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 19(2-3):101-106. Copes, Donald L. 1973. Inheritance of graft incompatibility in Douglas-fir. Bot. Gaz. 134(l):49-52. Copes, Donald L. 1974. Genetics of graft rejection in Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 4(2):186-192. Copes, Donald L. 1978. Isoenzyme activities differ in compatible and incompatible Douglas-fir graft unions. For. Sci. 24(2):297-303. Gnose, Charles E., and Donald L. Copes 1975. Improved laboratory methods for testing graft compatibility in Douglas-fir. USDA, For. Serv., Res. Note PNW-265, 14 p. Pac. Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. GPO 992-662 8