White Paper: Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology

Similar documents
Meat and Poultry Recalls USDA, FSIS

HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION. John W. McCutcheon Associate Deputy Administrator, Field Operations Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) & Imports of Food Products. August 9 th, 2016 Russell Statman, Registrar Corp

Egg Products Inspection Verification

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC RECALL OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MICROBIAL SAMPLING OF READY-TO-EAT (RTE) PRODUCTS

Starting on the Right Track

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2016 Biennial Conference for Food Protection

USDA-FSIS Recall Procedures

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. RECAll OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION. January 8, Mr. Ron Foster, CEO. P.O. Box 457. Dear Mr. Foster:

Documentation and Enforcement

9 CFR Parts 300, 441, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 537, 539, 540, 541, 544, 548, 550, 552, 555, 557, 559, 560, and 561

Food Safety and Inspection Service:

Whether a Poultry Slaughter or

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

United States Department of Agriculture FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE STRATEGIC PLAN

FSMA Compliance 2016 Carrier Concerns

EFFECTIVENESS CHECKS

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2012 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Reshaping FDA s Foods Program

On January 21, 2005, the Boulder District Office issued a Notice of Intended Enforcement (NOIE) to Establishment P-6164A.

Chairman, Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

The Food Safety Modernization Act: What Exporters to the U.S. Need to Know. Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC AVAILABILITY OF CLEANING FREQUENCY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC T F

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Table of Contents. How to Use This Service. Order of Chapters... iii. Contents of Appendices... How Tabs and Sections are Numbered...

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science

Food Safety and Problems Associated With Food Trade. Dr. Abdulla Ahmed Abdulla Chief, Food Control Kingdom of Bahrain Dubai, February 2006

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson VP Regulatory Services IPPE, February 2019

Requirements for Beef and Beef Products to be Exported to Japan from the United States of America January 25, 2013

edit subtitle style 1

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC RECALL OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

FDA s Food Safety Modernization Act: An Overview

The Food Safety Modernization Act and Its Implications for USDA and Dual Jurisdiction Establishments

Product Recall & Withdrawal Policy. For Suppliers of United Natural Foods, Inc.

Industry Best Practices for Customer Complaints of Foreign Material in Meat and Poultry Products. August 2018

USDA NEW POULTRY INSPECTION SYSTEM: WHAT ARE THE MAJOR ISSUES?

Strategic Plan FY FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE

Traceability & Other Requirements by Major Importing Blocks

The Meat Inspection Code of the Philippines: Securing Meat and Meat Products Safety from Farm to Table 1

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson January, 2018, IPPE

OneUSDA Do right and feed everyone

General Overview of the History, Regulations and Inspection Information for Direct Meat Marketing in Tennessee

Industry: Defining the Problem, Setting the Stage Catherine E. Woteki, Ph.D.

SANITATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

INQUIRY Swift Beef Company, Establishment 969G Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan

Successfully Managing Product Recalls and Withdrawals

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

Seafood Safety: Background and Issues

FSMA compliance update

Republic Act No The Food Safety Act of 2013

Recall Team. Date Assigned. Assignment Person Contact Information. Senior Operations Manager. Alt. Manager. Publicity & Public Relations.

2014/SCSC/WKSP1/004 Introduction to Risk-Based Food Inspection

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #11 Food and Agriculture

How Do Holds and Recalls Work with USDA Commodities?

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

PRODUCT RECALL GUIDELINES FOR FIRMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

FDA Food Protection Plan

Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs.

Food Fight: FSMA and the FDA s New Era of Enforcement. July By Sandra J. Wunderlich

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is issuing a final rule to establish

FSIS DIRECTIVE 10/18/11

Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meat and. AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

Draft Guidance on Good Importer Practices: All You Need to Know

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

FSMA Preventive Controls Preparedness Module and Guidance for BRC-certified Facilities Self-Assessment Tool

Foreign Supplier Verification Programs: The Final Rule.

IDENTIFYING & MANAGING GCP COMPLIANCE RISKS FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECH & DEVICE INDUSTRIES

FSMA Food Safety Modernization Act Frequently Asked Questions

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

FSMA. An Industry Perspective Patty Harvey MCAFDO February 24, 2016

Assuring Food Safety. Presented by Jill Hollingsworth, DVM Vice President, Food Safety Programs

Distinguishing Medical Device Recalls from Product Enhancements and Associated Reporting Requirements

Canadian Food Inspection Agency COMPLIANCE, CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORK

1/15/2013. What is POULTRY?? * Before getting started... Rules, Regulations and Processing Options

Eligibility of the People s Republic of China (PRC) to Export to. the United States Poultry Products from Birds Slaughtered in the

INQUIRY Swift Beef Co., Establishment 969G Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan

Meat and Poultry Inspection Kansas Department of Agriculture

How Food Safety is Changing the Transportation of your Product

Regulatory Requirements for Selling Meats. Beth Yongue, DVM Assistant State Director NCDA&CS Meat and Poultry Inspection Division

Code of Practice Processing of Poultry. Part 1: Overview

FSIS DIRECTIVE 10, /15/06

Implementing Regulatory Controls Presented by a Panel of the First Cohort of IFPTI Fellows

USDA United States Department of

Duplin County Alcohol and Drug-free Workplace Policy Adopted

Whitepaper April 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE US FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT 2011

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FOOD SAFETY A RESOURCE GUIDE

Presentation overview

Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance Inspections

Improved Food Inspection Model The Case for Change

NATIONAL PROCESSING AGREEMENT (NPA) STATE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (SPA)

FSMA s Foreign Supplier Verification Program

April 12, 2010 WARNING LETTER (10-ATL-12)

Lessons from USDA s Mandatory HACCP Rule for Meat and Poultry

Transcription:

USDA-FNS White Paper: Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology MULTI-AGENCY TASK FORCE FOR USDA FOODS USDA, Food and Nutrition Service This document provides an overview of basic food safety enforcement terminology used by FSIS that may impact school distributing agencies, school food authorities, and processors of USDA-regulated foods, including meat, poultry, and egg products. It is important to note that this document applies only to FSIS-regulated products. A variety of resources are provided at the end of this document for readers who would like additional information.

Food Safety Inspection Service Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology Overview The mission of the United States Department of Agriculture s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is to protect public health by ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing the production of meat, poultry, and egg products. The food-producing establishment (hereafter, establishment 1 ) has the responsibility to comply with the regulations and to produce a safe and wholesome food product. FSIS has the responsibility to verify that the establishment meets regulatory requirements. FSIS works to ensure that meat, poultry, and egg products are safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled through enforcement of the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, and the Egg Products Inspection Act and the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, where applicable. FSIS works to protect public health and prevent foodborne illness through various activities, including: inspection of establishments, conducting public education and outreach to increase safe food handling practices, and strengthening collaboration among stakeholders to prevent foodborne illness. FSIS coordinates with food safety partners at the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates other food products sold in commerce such as leafy greens, bakery goods, and beverages, and at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which investigates and identifies causes of foodborne illnesses. When food safety problems are identified, we work closely with the affected food producing establishment to protect the public health, using both voluntary and regulatory actions. This document provides an overview of basic food safety enforcement terminology used by FSIS that may impact school distributing agencies, school food authorities, and processors of USDA-regulated foods, including meat, poultry, and egg products. It is important to note that this document applies only to FSIS-regulated products. A variety of resources are provided at the end of this document for readers who would like additional information. 1 Establishment refers to any establishment that produces meat, poultry, and/or egg products regulated by USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service pursuant to the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, and the Egg Products Inspection Act. Each establishment must apply for and obtain a grant of inspection from FSIS prior to initiating operations at the facility. 1

VOLUNTARY ACTIONS Recall A recall is an establishment s voluntary action to remove product from commerce in order to protect the public from consuming adulterated or misbranded products. FSIS does not have authority to mandate that a company conduct a product recall. Although it is an establishment s decision to recall product, FSIS coordinates with the establishment to ensure it has properly identified and removed recalled product from commerce by verifying the effectiveness of its recall activities. FSIS also notifies the public about product recalls by issuing a recall press release, which is posted on FSIS website. FSIS does have the authority to detain and seize adulterated or misbranded products in commerce. Therefore, a voluntary recall may be an alternative to FSIS detention or seizure actions. However, a recall does not preclude FSIS from detaining and seizing products if an establishment has inadequately removed recalled product from commerce. The Agency will investigate if it appears that an establishment s recall strategy, or execution of that strategy, is ineffective and, based on its findings; FSIS may seek enforcement action against the recalling firm or its consignees. Market Withdrawal A market withdrawal is an establishment s removal or correction, on its own initiative, of a distributed product that involves a minor quality defect or regulatory program infraction that would not cause the product to be adulterated or misbranded. For example, a product that does not meet company quality standards because of discoloration would be eligible for a market withdrawal. Stock Recovery An establishment s removal or correction of product that has not been marketed or that has not left the direct control of the establishment. For example, product that is located on the premises owned by the producing establishment or under its control, and that has not been released for sale or use would be eligible for a stock recovery. REGULATORY ACTIONS Terminology In fulfilling the agency s mission, FSIS inspection personnel ensure that establishments comply with food safety regulations by conducting inspection verification activities and taking enforcement action when needed to ensure food safety compliance. FSIS uses these terms as follows: Compliance means that the establishment s processes are working properly in accordance with the laws and regulations. 2

Inspection includes all actions the Agency may take to examine the establishment and its processes, products, and systems. Enforcement actions are taken by FSIS personnel upon a determination that the establishment is not in compliance with regulatory requirements or that its plans and systems are not in compliance with laws and regulations. There are a range of enforcement actions that FSIS may utilize, as described below. The Rules of Practice, 9 CFR part 500, are FSIS s enforcement regulations. A. Enforcement Action Definitions and Explanations There are three types of enforcement actions defined in the Rules of Practice regulations (9 CFR part 500: 1. Regulatory control action. (9 CFR 500.2) Regulatory control actions are most commonly used by in-plant inspection personnel and include the retention of product, rejection of equipment or facilities, or the slowing or stopping of production lines. Regulatory control actions are taken to prevent potentially adulterated or misbranded product from leaving an establishment or to prevent the production of adulterated or misbranded product. Examples of such circumstances include: - Insanitary conditions likely to result in contamination of product, such as improperly cleaned equipment; - Conditions in the establishment that prevent an inspector from determining that product is not adulterated, such as inadequate lighting to determine whether product is adulterated. Regulatory control actions are taken in situations that require immediate correction. It is not necessary to notify the establishment in advance. Once FSIS takes action, however, federal regulations require that the inspection personnel taking the action immediately notify establishment management. This can be done orally or in writing. The written notification is called a noncompliance record (NR). 2. Withholding Action or Suspension. (9 C.F.R. 500.3; 500.4) A withholding action is the refusal to allow the marks of federal inspection to be applied to products. A withholding action may affect all product in the establishment or product produced by a particular process. Because the marks of federal inspection are required to appear on product labels, withholding the marks of inspection effectively prevents an establishment from distributing affected product produced during the time that the withholding action was in effect. Withholding is generally a more severe enforcement action than a regulatory control action because it can affect a larger part of an establishment or multiple products. A suspension action occurs when FSIS refuses to assign inspection personnel to all or part of an establishment. Because FSIS inspection is required by law, a suspension action effectively causes the establishment to cease operations in all or part of the establishment. 3

A withholding action or suspension can be taken either with or without prior notification to the establishment, depending on the seriousness of the regulatory violations. If the situation involves an imminent threat to public health, FSIS will initiate a withholding or suspension action without prior notice to the establishment. FSIS may also initiate a withholding action or suspension without prior notice if the establishment violates the terms of a regulatory control action, has threatened or intimidated an FSIS employee, refuses to destroy condemned product, or handles animals inhumanely. If FSIS initiates a withholding action or suspension without providing prior notice to the establishment, it will notify the establishment of the suspension orally and, as promptly as circumstances permit, in writing. If FSIS provides notice to the establishment prior to initiating a withholding or suspension action, it does so by issuing a letter called a Notice of Intended Enforcement Action (NOIE). The establishment is given an opportunity to submit actions that will correct the noncompliance and prevent it from recurring in the future. If FSIS accepts the establishment s planned corrective and preventive measures, it will hold the withholding or suspension action in abeyance. Examples of circumstances that may result in a withholding action or suspension include: - Sanitary conditions in the establishment are such that products produced in the establishment are or would be rendered adulterated. - The establishment does not have the required Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan or Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures. - The HACCP plan is inadequate based on multiple or recurring non-compliance reports. 3. Withdrawal of Inspection. (9 C.F.R. 500.6) Withdrawal of the grant of inspection is the most severe enforcement action that can be taken by FSIS against an establishment. Withdrawal terminates the grant of inspection which generally means that the establishment can no longer operate as an FSIS-inspected establishment. Therefore, the establishment could not produce, sell or distribute product in commerce.. Withdrawal actions can be the culmination of a lengthy process. Establishments that have been subjected to withholding actions and suspensions can eventually be subject to a withdrawal action for repetitive non-compliance. FSIS can also initiate a withdrawal action if the owner or operator or anyone responsibly connected with the establishment has been convicted of certain crimes or if establishment personnel have intimidated or harassed FSIS personnel in the performance of their official duties. 4

Resources 9 CFR 500 (Sections 1 8). Food Safety and Inspection Service: Part 500 Rules of Practice. Available online at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/cfr-2012-title9-vol2/cfr-2012-title9-vol2-sec500-1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks, United States, 2013, Annual Report. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 2015. Available Online at http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/pdfs/foodborne-diseaseoutbreaks-annual-report-2013-508c.pdf. Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA), 1970. Available online at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/rulemaking/egg-products-inspection-act Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA), 1906. Available online at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/rulemaking/federal-meat-inspection-act Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA), 1957. Available online at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/rulemaking/poultry-products-inspection-acts USDA Food Safety Inspection Service. About FSIS. Available online at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/informational/aboutfsis. 5