UNDER SECRETARY FOR HEALTH S INFORMATION LETTER MICROBIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CLEANROOMS

Similar documents
Environmental Monitoring of Aseptic Processing Areas - 2

PHARMACY IV ADMIXTURE. Pharmacy 483 January 17, 2006 Kim Donnelly Affiliate Associate Professor

PHARMACY IV ADMIXTURE

Biocontamination control in pharmaceutical production

How to Handle Excursions in Environmental Monitoring (EM) and Personnel Monitoring (PM) in an Aseptic Processing Plant

Baxa Corporation. Technical Paper. Environmental Controls for Sterile Compounding

INSPECTOR S OBSERVATIONS AND WARNING LETTER

Why Do I Test, What Do I Test & When Do I Test It? Ross Caputo, PhD Chief Technical Officer Eagle Analytical Services

TECHNICAL LEAFLET. MEDI-MEDIA-FILL KIT SUPPLY PACKAGE (Code: MR-25/S)

USP <797> and Environmental Sampling

FDA s Guidance for Industry

USP Chapter <797> & <800> Testing Supplies

BIO & PHARMA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Compounding Aseptic Isolators (CAI) James T Wagner

MICROBIO BIOAEROSOL SAMPLING

IN THIS SECTION MICROBIOLOGY TESTING EXPERT SOLUTIONS FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Bacterial Endotoxin (LAL) Testing

The attached report is the result of a mold and bacterial assessment conducted at th Street, Franklin, Ohio on April 24 and 25, 2008.

This compilation of the complex

QUALITY ASSURANCE & AUDIT

PhEn-602 Notes # 4 J. Manfredi

USP <797>/<800> Cleanroom Design & Environmental Monitoring. A presentation for HealthTrust Members November 14, 2018

USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)

Approval Block. Prepared by: Signature Date. Evan Parnell 18 JUN Reviewed by: Signature Date. Brian Flynn 18 JUN 2014

Bioburden Contamination Control: A Holistic Overview

The ABCs and Challenges of GMP The American Experience

NHS QA Symposium, September 2013

ANALYTICAL REPORT: Comparison of the Microbial Recovery Efficacy of QI Medical EnviroTest Paddles versus a Conventional Contact Plate

Test record CFU measurement. Test ID Site/Clinic Spijkenisse

Overview of a sterility assurance program for PET drugs

LUNCH AND LEARN. September 11, CE Activity Information & Accreditation

Microbiologic Sampling of the Environment

Sterile Compounding elearning Course Curriculum 28 lessons with 33 hours of CE. Fundamentals of Sterile Compounding (8 lessons/8 hours CE)

Sterile Compounding elearning Course Curriculum 28 lessons with 33 hours of CE. Fundamentals of Sterile Compounding (8 lessons/8 hours CE)

Microbiology Testing: USP requirements for Sterile and Nonsterile Preparations Webinar Q&A

BIOTRAK REAL-TIME VIABLE PARTICLE COUNTER ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION GUIDANCE

Advances in Sterility Assurance: Single Use Devices and Rapid Microbiological Tests

USP <1116> and Contamination

MICROBIOLOGICAL CULTURE MEDIA

MICROBIO BIOAEROSOL SAMPLING

Industry Perspective on PET Manufacturing Comparison of EU and US

for IND and RDRC Regulated PET Compounding

2008 ASHP Summer Meeting Seattle, Washington Educational Session Abstracts

Microbiological Consideration for Non-Sterile Pharmaceutical

STANDARDS FOR COMPOUNDING PHARMACIES

THE EFFECT OF DUCT CLEANING ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN OFFICE BUILDINGS

ASEPTIC BIOPHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING: FAQs

Environmental Monitoring of Aseptic Processing Areas - 1

A FIELD COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ENUMERATING AIRBORNE FUNGAL BIOAEROSOLS

Study Summary. Results: All tested media-filled vials were negative for growth of any microorganisms.

Position: Sr. Director of Education and Data - NHIA, VP of Research - NHIF

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A VENDOR

PDA: A Global. Association. Contamination Control: Particles, Bio-contamination, Aseptic manufacturing. PDA Parenteral 2014 Munich Conference

Environmental Control Requirements. Gordon Farquharson July 2017

Chapter WAC Compounding Practices Crosswalk

70% Isopropyl Alcohol

Airborne Particle Detection

Sanitization of ÄKTA pilot 600 using sodium hydroxide

HealthWay dfs Technology VS HEPA

Sterile Compounding Safety

MANUFACTURING MICROBIOLOGY. Chad Ronholdt, B.Sc., MBA Vice President Strategic Development

Microgen and Airocide Technology as a Method for Sterilization in ICU: A Comparative Study

INTERPRETING MICROBIAL MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS

On behalf of the PHSS Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Sciences Society (UK).

UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report

Who says you re competent?

Improving and Optimizing your Viable Environmental Monitoring Program. Jason Willett Midwest Manager Veltek Associates, Inc.

Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of ImpactAir Microbiological Air Sampler Using Techniques Described in ISO

Cleaning Efficiency of The MicroOne Wipe and Mop Cleaning System

4.5 Compounding Compounding in Licensed Pharmacies.

US Regulatory Requirements: Clinical & Clinical Research Production, SPECT & PET Radiopharmaceuticals (RPs)

INDOOR AIR QUALITY TESTING AT CARLISLE COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

NCCEH Mould Investigation Toolkit

FLORIDA SOCIETY OF HEALTH SYSTEM PHARMACISTS NOVEMBER 4, 2016 JAMES T WAGNER CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT CONSULTING

Post Sterilization Lab Contamination

USP CHAPTER <797> INTRODUCTION RISK LEVELS

Pharmacy Compounding: Infection Prevention

Annex A2. Guidance on Process Validation Scheme for Aseptically Processed Products

MICROBIOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HATCHERY: Laboratory Methods

Enhanced Sterile Medication Compounding Evaluation

Tests to Support Sterility Claim. Imtiaz Ahmed

HVAC and Risk Management RACI Meeting 7 th December Agenda. Design. Project Management. Context. Qualification. Construction

Developed and Presented by: Wisconsin Healthcare Engineering Association

Complaints Investigations Root Cause Analysis

GUIDE TO INSPECTIONS OF MICROBIOLOGICAL PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORIES

Entry Level Assessment Blueprint Biotechnology

Premise Microbial Testing

j) Direct and Contiguous Compounding Area refers to the specific area where a compound is prepared.

New York State Department of Health - Wadsworth Center Laboratory of Environmental Biology NYS ELAP Laboratory ID 10765

Media Fill Test Kits USP <797> COMPLIANT. HARDY DIAGNOSTICS. Low Risk. Medium Risk. High Risk

á61ñ MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF NONSTERILE PRODUCTS: MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TESTS

Analysis of Agion Coated Galvanized Steel Air Ducts in Woodward Academy Middle School after 10 Years of Service

Infection and Intravenous Drug Delivery: A Long and Tumultuous Relationship

MOLD REMEDIATION PROCEDURES AT A NEW JERSEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

ASSESSMENT OF BIOAEROSOL DISTRIBUTIONS IN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION

Allergy Laboratories, Inc. 10/4/13

Recent USP Updates May, 2013

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Pharmaceutical Compounding Sterile and Nonsterile Preparations. Jeanne Sun, PharmD

DuPont Tyvek delivers trusted protection for pharmaceutical products

Study disproves misconception about contamination of sterile IPA bottles.

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Health Administration Washington DC 20420 IL 10-2006-008 In Reply Refer To: 10NB UNDER SECRETARY FOR HEALTH S INFORMATION LETTER MICROBIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CLEANROOMS 1. This VHA Information Letter provides recommendations for microbiological assessment of pharmacy cleanrooms and the testing of biocabinet or isolator interiors. a. United States Pharmacopeia (USP), Chapter 797, Pharmaceutical Compounding, Sterile Preparations, specifies the monitoring of microbiological concentrations on surfaces and air for sterile pharmaceutical compounding. b. USP, Chapter 1116, Microbiological Evaluation of Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments, provides additional guidance. c. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides regulatory requirements and recommendations for the drug manufacturing industry. d. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) specifies practices for accurate monitoring of indoor airborne microbial concentrations. e. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14644 requires acceptable airborne particulate concentrations and assessment for pharmaceutical cleanrooms. 2. USP 797 specifies a written plan and schedule for microbiological monitoring procedures in pharmaceutical cleanrooms. Monitoring locations are selected to test the areas most prone to contamination during compounding. Typically, this would include area sampling in the proximity of Class II biocabinets or barrier isolators (ISO Class 5 containment). The plan needs to specify sampling for the controlled environments of the pharmacy, including the interior of biocabinets and barrier isolators, compounding rooms (ISO Class 7 buffer areas), and anterooms (ISO Class 8 support areas) located outside the buffer area. Each sampling site (air, swab, or contact) needs to have predetermined alert and action levels as part of the written plan. Any sample result exceeding the action level requires immediate corrective action which may include full-scale cleaning, ventilation, or High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter assessment and suspension of drug compounding until retesting verifies compliance.

3. GUIDANCE a. Collection of Microbiological Samples in Cleanrooms. Microbiological sampling should be incorporated into the cleanroom commissioning process to verify engineering controls and provide baseline data prior to compounding activities. Air sampling should be conducted monthly for low-medium risk compounding and weekly for high-risk compounding. Cleanroom microflora will originate from staff, supplies and product contamination, air backwash through entrances and room filter leakage. Air samples should be collected following any required cleanroom air purge time that has been established by the pharmacy unit. The air purge time ensures the necessary number of air changes have been completed to reduce airborne contaminants prior to starting compounding activities. Electric pump air sampling (active air sampling) may be conducted using slit, sieve or centrifugal impact samplers. Samples are collected on nutrient media and incubated to promote microbial growth. The plate colonies are counted and reported as the number of colony forming units per cubic meter of air (cfu/m 3 ). The use of settling plates (open plates exposed for >1 hour) is suggested by USP 797. Settling plates have a higher error rate due to the uncontrolled sampling method and susceptibility to indoor air currents. USP recommends that settling plates only be used during sampling with electric pump samplers to allow for the comparison of data. The ACGIH documents high variability in airborne microbiological assessment data. Data variability is affected by media selection and storage, plate handling (temperature extremes during shipping to culture labs), incubation temperature and species viability. Species competition on the plate also affects total plate count. b. Culture Plate Media and Incubation. USP recommends plate media and incubations times for general culture. Sampling should be conducted using non-selective malt extract agar or trypticase soy agar (TSA). Malt extract can be used for fungi culture with incubation at 20-25 C for up to 7 days. USP 797 recommends TSA media incubated at 30-35 C for 48 hours (bacteria, yeast and mold). USP 1116 recommends incubation temperatures of 22.5 C (± 2.5 C) or 32.5 C (±2.5 C) for 48-72 hours. More importantly, the plate media, incubation temperature and sample time should be consistent to ensure appropriate comparison of data. The decision to change culture media should be phased-in gradually and include side-by-side plate sampling for data comparison. Media may also be selected to assess specific microbiological species (i.e., gram-negative or positive bacteria). c. Airborne Microbiological Concentrations. Current USP 797 does not recommend specific airborne microbiological concentration limits for cleanrooms. (1) The standard specifies the collection of microbial data and recommends corrective action when colony counts exceed the baseline by 50 percent (medium to high-risk compounding) and 100 percent (low-risk compounding). (2) Alternatively, Hussong and Madsen provide an analysis of baseline deviation specific to cleanroom operations. The data trend is used to establish upper and lower confidence limits for cleanroom colony counts (see subpar. 4c). The FDA provides comparison between ISO class 7 and 8 environments and microbiological action levels using active air sampling and settling plates (see Table 1 and subpar. 4d). 2

(3) Kastango recommends less than (<) 2.5 colony forming units (cfu) per cubic foot (ft 3 ) airborne bioburden for cleanrooms and anterooms and <0.1 cfu/ft 3 for ISO Class 5 biocabinets and isolators (see subpar. 4f). ISO Class Particles per cubic meter (M 3 )(more than (>) 0.5 micron (µm)) Table 1 FDA Recommended Action Levels Air Sampling Action Level: cfu/m 3 (cfu/ft 3 ) 5 3,520 1 (0.028) 1 6 35,200 7 (0.2) 3 7 352,000 10 (0.28) 5 8 3,520,000 100 (2.83) 50 Settling Plate Action Level: cfu at 4 hours d. Sampling Strategy for Cleanrooms. Sampling sites need to be selected in high-traffic areas where the potential exists for product contamination and to verify levels at compounding work areas. (1) Air samples need to be collected within 12 inches of all Class 5 containment work zones (12 inches outside the cabinet face), all cleanroom entrances, and the anteroom. NOTE: Specific guidance on sampling locations is provided in Chapter 18, ASHP, Compounding Sterile Preparations (see subpar. 4f). A minimum of one media plate or 20 percent of the total plates needs to be incubated as a control (non-exposed blank) for each assessment to check media contamination. (2) Table 2 provides the recommended air sample volumes for estimated airborne microbiological concentrations. An air sample volume of 990 liters of air would meet the ACGIH recommended lower detection level(ldl=10 cfu/plate) and upper detection limits (UDL=1 cfu/ square centimeter (cm 2 ) of plate) for a ISO Class 7 room with 1-10 cfu/m 3. Table 2 Air Sample Volumes to meet ACGIH Recommended Detection Limits NOTE: Based on 28 liters per minute air sampling rate; 78 cm 2 culture plate. Sample Time (minutes) Sample Volume (liters) LDL = 10 cfu/plate UDL = 1 cfu/cm 2 of plate 15 420 15 cfu/m 3 130 cfu/m 3 20 560 8 cfu/m 3 65 cfu/m 3 25 700 4 cfu/m 3 33 cfu/m 3 30 840 2 cfu/m 3 17 cfu/m 3 35 990 1 cfu/m 3 9 cfu/m 3 3

40 1130 <1 cfu/m 3 5 cfu/m 3 e. Identification of Microbiological Species. Most laboratory services will provide Genus identification with total plate colony count. In certain applications it may be beneficial to determine whether the bacteria is gram positive or negative, or a full identification to species level of the organism may be required. Species identification may be appropriate during cleanroom commissioning for comparison to an action level event. Identification to species can assist in determining the source of contamination and corrective actions. Additionally, air sampling can be conducted in adjacent hallways or outdoor air to assess anterooms, or HEPA filter bypass. f. ISO Class 5 Microbiological Containment Testing. The interior of ISO Class 5 (biocabinets and isolators) need to be monitored for microbiological air quality at a minimum of once a month, or weekly for high-risk compounding. Sampling may be conducted using media filled plates or commercial media fills. At least two plate samples need to be collected at opposite ends of the cabinet, 6 inches from the interior wall. Settling plates or active air sampling can be used for the assessment. Settling plates should be exposed for the entire compounding procedure (1-3 hours) and are an acceptable alternative due to the laminar downflow within the cabinet. (1) It is also recommended that finger touch plates be conducted monthly. This procedure requires the technician to contact a media plate during compounding with the gloved fingertips. (2) Swabbing of interior cabinet surfaces also need to be conducted using pre-filled media tubes with a swab insert or a commercial media fill (Rodac plates). (3) Media fills need to contain a neutralizing agent (i.e., polysorbate 80) to inactivate residual cleaning and disinfection solutions. (4) Following incubation, colonies need to be counted and reported as cfus. Samples from ISO Class 5 environments normally yield no microbiological colonies. 4. REFERENCES a. United States Pharmacopeia, USP29-NF24, Chapter 797, Pharmaceutical Compounding- Sterile Preparations. http://www.usp797.org/index.html b. United States Pharmacopeia, USP29-NF24, Chapter 1116, Microbiological Evaluation of Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments. c. Hussong and Madsen, Analysis of Environmental Microbiological Data from Cleanroom Samples, Pharmaceutical Technology, Aseptic Processing 2004. http://vaww.ceosh.med.va.gov/pharmacysafety/final%20-%20env%20monitoring.pdf d. FDA, Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing Current Good Manufacturing Practices. http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5882fnl.pdf 4

e. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Guidelines for the Assessment of Bioaerosols in the Indoor Environment, 1989. f. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Compounding Sterile Preparations(2 nd edition), Chapter 18: Environmental Monitoring, 2005. 5. Inquiries. Questions regarding this information letter may be addressed to Network Program Support (10NB) at (202) 273-5870. Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, MSHA, FACP Under Secretary for Health DISTRIBUTION: CO: E-mailed 6/30/06 FLD: VISN, MA, DO, OC, OCRO, and 200 E-mailed 6/30/06 5