STANDARD INSPECTION OF GUY ANCHORS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH SOIL. Rev: 4/06

Similar documents
AREMA COMMITTEE 8. Letter Ballot Number

Introduction to Cathodic Protection

Corrosion Investigation for Contra Costa Community College District - Brentwood Campus

Table of Contents. List of Drawings

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR POLE ERECTION

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO. 808 REINFORCED CONCRETE VAULTS

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR ERECTION OF POLES

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR ERECTION OF POLES

Headquarters: Matco Services, Inc Ida Street PO Box 358 Valley, NE Phone: (800)

[ W H I T E P A P E R. Corrosion of Helical Anchors In Soil. T h o m a s B r a g g Ph.D. Director, Special Projects Pacific Housing Systems.

CHANGES ON THE WIND MARK MALOUF, P.E. AGL (ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) AUG/SEP 2005 pp

Iron is found in an oxidized state and is mined from the ground as an iron ore.

Part 192 Corrosion Enforcement Guidance

Sika Galvashield CC Embedded Galvanic Anodes for Corrosion Control in Contaminated but Sound Concrete

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF POLES

CATHODIC PROTECTION FOR SOIL STEEL BRIDGES 1

Village of Hasting-on-Hudson, NY DRAFT Water Tower Evaluation Attorney-Client Work Product For Discussion Purposes Only

Notice of Preparation of Initial Study

Tower Site Inspection Procedures

AN INTRODUCTION TO CATHODIC PROTECTION OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CRIBLOCK CONCRETE CRIBWALL

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR POLE ERECTION

INSTITUTE OF INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. (IIEE-ERCSA) First IIEE Accredited Foreign Chapter (Charter

Construction Requirements for Installation of Utilities in the Public Right-of-way of McPherson County, Kansas October 2011

Utilizing NDT for Cost Effective Maintenance and Mitigation Purposes

Practical Checklists of Best Practices Frank Donovan, W3LPL

Post-tensioned Structures Solutions for Repair and Protection

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4492 Tie Back Anchors

SECTION GROUND WATER STORAGE TANKS

SPECIFICATIONS - DETAILED PROVISIONS Section Corrosion Monitoring System for Underground Piping C O N T E N T S

POLYGUARD RD-6 A FAIL SAFE PIPELINE COATING SYSTEM FOR REHABILITATION OR GIRTH WELDS ON CATHODICALLY PROTECTED PIPELINES

The Advancement of Direct Assessment Methodologies for Difficult-to-Assess Piping

a: potential difference before direct current is applied b: potential difference after the application of current

An Introduction to Cathodic Protection

1993 SPECIFICATIONS CSJ SPECIAL SPECIFICATION ITEM 4110 CONCRETE ENCASED DUCT BANK

PennDOT Pub. 170 Highway Occupancy Permit (HOP) Manual Page 56

Protective Coatings for Underground Utility Concrete Structures. By: John E. Davis Inside Sales & Marketing Specialist: Sauereisen, Inc.

SECTION METAL DECKING. A. Extent of metal decking is indicated on Plans, including basic layout for the following type of deck required:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 15 OVER THE ARCOLA CHANNEL HENNEPIN COUNTY

Armor Plate Pipe Wrap

Cathodic Protection as a Corrosion Control Alternative

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CR 27 OVER THE RED LAKE RIVER DISTRICT 2 PENNINGTON COUNTY

EXAMPLE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS (SSI)

CHAPTER 12 HANDHOLES, PULLING VAULTS, AND JUNCTION BOXES

TABLE OF CONTENT

EVALUATION & REPAIR OF CORROSION DAMAGED ROOF LIFT SLAB WITH WIRE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM (BUTTON HEADS)

PIPE CULVERTS. Construct pipe culverts, beveled ends, pipe aprons, and associated appurtenances.

The Hidden Damage Done (HDD?)

TECHNICAL PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Northeast Gas Operation School Thursday June 5 th

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR FOOTINGS AND PADS FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

Underground Exhaust System

Wood County Building Inspection

Part 1: On-land pipelines

Tank Inspection Report Town of Christiansburg, VA Hills Tank Liquid Engineering Corporation 36903

The Problem. Galvashield Next Generation Technology. What causes Corrosion? Traditional Cathodic Protection Systems

Communication Pole Inspection & Maintenance PROTECT YOUR ASSETS & PROLONG THEIR LIFESPAN

1. CORROSION OF REINFORCEMENT

Marina Coast Water District Marina, CA Steel Reservoir #2

Hybrid Electrochemical Treatment Applied to Corrosion Damaged Concrete Structures

FDOT CATHODIC PROTECTION PRACTICES FOR BRIDGE PRESERVATION

ONLINE MONITORING OF UNDERCOATING CORROSIONS UTILIZING COUPLED MULTIELECTRODE SENSORS. Xiaodong Sun Corr Instruments, LLC San Antonio TX, USA ABSTRACT

SECTION FLAGPOLES

Fiberglass Basin Installation Reference Guide

SPECIAL INSPECTION AND OBSERVATION PROGRAM CITY OF CONCORD BUILDING DIVISION. Project Address:

CHAPTER 2. Restricted Residential ½ Street** Design Speed 25 MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 40 MPH 50 MPH 55 MPH

Foundation Specifications

GUIDELINES FOR RETAINING WALLS 4-0 IN HEIGHT OR LESS

DIVISION 2 - SITE WORK

BRIDGE MANAGEMENT, EVALUATION AND REHABILITATION. Idaho Transportation Department Matt Farrar

CHAPTER 11 CONDUITS AND FITTINGS

CORROSION AND CORROSION CONTROL An Introduction to Corrosion Science and Engineering

Ductile Iron Piles Corrosion Resistance

Case Histories for Cased Crossings Using an Integrated Tool Approach with Long Range Guided Wave. NACE DA Conference By Joe Pikas

Technical Data Sheet NEC/GRAN/95:01

TECHNIACL SPECIAL PROVISION FOR NON-STRUCTURAL AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRAL PILE JACKET WITH SACRIFICIAL CATHODIC PROTECTION

Applying for a Kinder Morgan Cochin Canada / UTOPIA Canada Proximity & Crossing Permit. Design and Construction Guidelines

Quality Control and Quality Assurance for Installation of Steel Deck

HANDHOLES, PULLING VAULTS AND JUNCTION BOXES

APPLICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT

SECTION CS-2. TRENCH EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

Stanford University Facilities Design Guidelines SECTION CATHODIC PROTECTION. B. Section : Site Restoration and Rehabilitation

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DISTRICT 4 - CLAY COUNTY

SERVICE LIFE EVALUATION OF CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE

Flygt Advanced Low Pressure Sewer System Package

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 3 OVER THE RED LAKE RIVER DISTRICT 2 - PENNINGTON COUNTY

Introduction. The materials in this guidance document may be modified or revoked without prior notice by PHMSA management.

It is the CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY to use OSHA approved shoring

Mears Group, Inc. Integrity Assessment for Non-Piggable Pipelines By Jim Walton

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO SANITARY SEWER LATERAL STUB OUTS OR RECONNECTIONS

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR FOOTINGS AND PADS FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

Quality Assurance Review for Bridge Construction

SPECIFICATION FOR REINFORCED SOIL WALL

Section 2: Underground

Chapter 10. Pipeline Installation

The DuoGuard Hybrid Anode Range Installation Guidelines

An Introduction to. By Michael L. Schumaker, P.E. An Introduction to Shaner Industries Metal Foundation System

ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES Hot Weather Concreting

INSTALLATION GUIDELINE POLES USED FOR SUPPORTING ANTENNAS

Designing for Mechanical Integrity: Piping

Transcription:

STANDARD INSPECTION OF GUY ANCHORS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH SOIL Rev: 4/06

INSPECTION OF GUY ANCHORS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH SOIL Commentary - Guy anchors in direct contact with soil have proven to be susceptible to galvanic corrosion. As telecommunications towers are coming of age the issue has been brought to the forefront due to tower failures caused by guy anchor corrosion. This standard outlines minimum requirements for inspection of deadman guy anchors on existing towers as well as presenting minimum corrosion control measures to protect anchors in direct contact with soil. 1.0 Introduction The standard will discuss two types of anchor inspections. The first is referred to as surface inspection where only a portion of the anchor is inspected below The second type is referred to as subsurface inspection where the entire anchor shaft in direct contact with soil is exposed allowing complete inspection. The standard outlines what is included in both types of inspection. The information gathered during an inspection is intended to help owners and inspectors determine corrosive conditions at the tower site, the structural condition of the anchor and mitigating measures to prevent corrosion. 2.0 Surface Inspection Commentary: A surface inspection is intended to be the most economical and give the inspector / owner a basis for determining if further action may be necessary. 2.1 Measure and record the dimensions of the anchor shaft above 2.2 Excavate each anchor to expose a minimum of two feet of the buried portion of the anchor shaft. 2.3 Collect a forty-eight ounce sample or six cups of soil from the bottom of the excavation and store in a water tight container. Soil from one anchor is adequate to perform necessary tests. 2.3.1 Laboratory test the sample in both as-found and saturated state to determine resistivity in ohm-centimeters. 2.4 Clean the anchor of soil and/or corrosion scale to bare metal in the location where corrosion appears to be the most severe. 2

2.5 Measure and record the cross sectional dimensions of the anchor shaft in its most corroded location. 2.6 Rate the anchor shaft based on the Corrosion Severity Factor, i.e. CSF1, CSF 2 or CSF 3 (See Annex A) 2.7 Backfill and compact the excavation. Painting or cold galvanizing the anchor is not required. 3.0 Subsurface Inspection Commentary: A subsurface inspection is intended to provide a complete condition assessment of the portion of the steel guy anchor in direct contact with the soil. 3.1 Measure and record the dimensions of the anchor shaft above 3.2 Excavate the anchor to expose the entire length of the buried portion of the anchor shaft to where it meets the concrete anchorage. NOTE: Subsurface inspection should not be conducted on helical anchors. 3.2.1 Care should be taken to not over expose the concrete anchorage during the excavation process. 3.2.2 Temporary anchorage may be advisable to protect the tower against failure if anchors are suspected to have structural damage. 3.3 Clean the anchor of soil and/or corrosion scale to bare metal in the location where corrosion appears to be the most severe. 3.4 Measure and record the cross sectional dimensions of the anchor shaft in its most corroded location. 3.5 Rate the anchor shaft based on the Corrosion Severity Factor, i.e. CSF1, CSF 2 or CSF 3 (See Annex A) 3.6 Backfill and compact the excavation. Painting or cold galvanizing the anchor is not required. 4.0 Corrosion Control Commentary There are several methods that can be utilized to mitigate corrosion of steel in direct contact with soil. This section discusses the most effective methods for tower guy anchors. It is up to the user to determine the best 3

method for their particular application. For further information refer to ANSI/TIA 222-G, Annex H, Additional Corrosion Control or contact. 4.1 Galvanic Anode Cathodic Protection: The size, type and placement of galvanic anodes are to be determined by a competent corrosion control specialist or firm. Galvanic anode cathodic protection shall be used for anchors in direct contact with soil when soil resistivity is lower than 5000 ohmcentimeters, ph is above 8.5 or below 4. This method may also be advisable when soil resistivity is lower than 10,000 ohmcentimeters. Refer to Table 4.1.1 Table 4.1.1: Soil Resistivity Classification A.W.Peabody Resistivity in ohm/cm Category 0 5,000 Very Corrosive 5,000 10,000 Moderately Corrosive 10,000 25,000 Progressively Less Corrosive References: 4.2 Concrete Encasement at Time of Initial Installation: Sulfate resisting concrete designs should be used for all concrete below When a concrete deadman is used with an anchor, the reinforcing in the concrete encasement shall be properly engineered into the concrete deadman to prevent excess cracking. The concrete encasement shall extend a minimum of 6 inches (150 mm) above Concrete encasement other than at the time of initial installation is not advised since the area near the cold joint of the encasement and the initial deadman could be subject to accelerated corrosion. Corrosion Basics, An Introduction, 2 nd Edition, Roberge, P. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 2006. Evaluating Soil Corrosivity Then and Now. Fitzgerald III, J.H., Corrosion 93, The NACE Annual Conference and Corrosion Show, 1993, Paper No. 4. Peabody s Control of Pipeline Corrosion, 2 nd Edition, edited by Bianchetti, R.L., NACE International, August 2001. Structural Standards For Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures. ANSI/TIA 222-G, Annex H: Additional Corrosion Control, January 2006. 4

Annex A Corrosion Severity Factor (CSF) Anchor shafts shall be given a rating at time of inspection relative to the severity of the corrosion found. The rating is based on a scale referred to hereafter as the corrosion severity factor or CSF. Corrosion Severity Factor shall be compared against the most corroded area of the shaft. 1. Corrosion Severity Factor 1 (CSF 1) includes the following: Galvanizing in tact, no signs of rust, no cross sectional material loss. Anchors rated CSF 1 should be monitored in the future during regular tower inspections. 2. Corrosion Severity Factor 2 (CSF 2) includes any of the following: Galvanizing slightly to mostly gone, rust spots prevalent, minor pitting or flaking, no cross sectional material loss. Additional corrosion control is highly recommended. 3. Corrosion Severity Factor 3 (CSF 3) includes ANY of the following: Galvanizing mostly to completely gone, heavily corroded, deep pitting, large areas of flaking, measurable cross sectional material loss. Anchors rated CSF 3 require additional corrosion control methods and may require repair or replacement. 5