FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Similar documents
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

General Decision Number: CA /02/2015 CA3. Superseded General Decision Number: CA State: California

California Health Benefit Exchange QDP Certification Application for Plan Year 2018 Attachment C1 Current & Projected Enrollment

CAIR Before and After: The Evolution of Implementing a New State Immunization System

Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Survey

User Guide for the Chief Probation Officers of California Data Dashboard: Juvenile Probation

CHIS 2013 Sample Design and Survey Methodology TAC. August 30, 2012

RECOMMENDED AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR THE PPM FEDERAL 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD STAFF REPORT

What Non-Riders Want. Presented by: Joey M. Goldman, Principal CTA Fall Conference, Oakland. November 17, 2016

Zebra and Quagga Mussel Veliger Sampling Protocol Vertical Tow * California Department of Fish and Game

Notice of Preparation. Notice of Preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report for the California Vegetation Treatment Program

Impacts of MTBE on California Groundwater

CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES. County Offices and Ballot Measures

Notice of Preparation Colusa County 2030 General Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report

r l i u r a Farming is Everywhere

2007 POSITIONS Invasive Weeds Awareness Day at the Capitol March 14, 2007

Access to Paid Sick Days in California

Farming is Everywhere

III Demand and Supply

Becoming a California Registered Voter

California s agricultural sector, a major groundwater

The Measure of California Agriculture

Chapter 30 Growth Inducement and Other Indirect Effects

Bureau Chief. Section Chief

Three Federal Pesticide Injunctions for Protection of Endangered Species

A Better Way: Product Stewardship

ACP.HLB PROGRAM UPDATE

2017 San Joaquin Valley Survey - Results on Water

Media Kit

Volumetric Pricing for Sanitary Sewer Service in the State of California

RED. California Wireless E Routing on Empirical Data. Shaving Time Saving Lives - A Success Story

NW Biosolids - Biofest October 15, Greg Kester CASA Karri Ving - SFPUC

DRAFT. An Assessment of Biomass Resources in California, Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program INTERIM PROJECT REPORT

Organics Recycling in 2017: Climate Change, the Circular Economy, and the Moral Imperative of Composting

Biosolids and Wastewater Sector Combat Climate Change: What Can We Learn From California?

CALIFORNIA SOLAR RESOURCES DRAFT STAFF PAPER

Climate Smart Agriculture Programs

Local Revenue Measures June 2006

Graphical Visualization of Potential Cost Savings from Energy Storage under Time-of-Use Electric Rates

Forestry, Forest Industry, and Forest Products Consumption in California

Santa Clara County Fire Chiefs Association Hazardous Materials Subcommittee

Drought Case Studies. May 24, 2016 Presenter: Stephen Burke, WRCE Northern California Drought Coordinator

CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES. City Offices and Ballot Measures

Project Title: Need assessment for small-scale livestock harvesting and processing facilities in Northern California.

Spring Biosolids Symposium. Greg Kester Director of Renewable Resource Programs

The Potential Impact of Climate Change to California

2014 California Biomedical Industry Report

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR LAKE COUNTY INTEGRATING CANNABIS CULTIVATION

Chief Executive Officer

Clark Pest Control 6255 Ferris Square San Diego, CA, Tel Fax Registration #: PR226

USE INFORMATION AND AIR MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS SULFURYL FLUORIDE AND CHLOROPICRIN

Introduction. The survey questionnaire is attached as an appendix.

Understanding California s Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375): A Local Official s Guide

Inventory of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Contracts Collection, No online items

TREE MORTALITY TASK FORCE REGULATIONS WORKING GROUP

Local Revenue Measures November 2007

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 5 AT 4 PM

A. For starters, would you say that the best description of the community where you live is:

2017 Biocom California Economic Impact Report Databook

Nineteen Agencies Team to Convert Biosolids to Energy for a Regional Solution

WBUR Poll Massachusetts 2016 General Election Survey of 502 Likely Voters Field Dates October 13-16, 2016

Virginia General Election Voters

Measuring Political Will. Lessons from Modifying the Policymaker Ratings Method

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, August 20 at 1:00 p.m.

CALIFORNIA FARMLAND CONVERSION REPORT

Notice of Preparation for the General Plan Environmental Impact Report

Enhancing the Customer Experience through Technology

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

Southern California Socioeconomic Assessment: Sociodemographic Conditions, Projections, and Quality of Life Indices

Water Supply and Growth in California: A Survey of City and County Land-Use Planners

April 10 th, Sonoma County Assessor s Office Benchmark and Cost-Benefit Analysis Project Report

Likely Voters Oct. 9-13, % 44% 9% * 2% 2% Registered Voters Oct. 9-13, % 40% 10% * 5% 3%

Air Quality Conformity Analysis

Grants Bond Act Bond Program Grantee Prop 13 Bay Delta Multipurpose Water Management United States Geological Survey

5. Presentation by Pacific Gas & Electric on the Urban Forest, Utility Delivery Interface

NATIONAL: PUBLIC TROUBLED BY DEEP STATE

CaliforniaWireless E9-1-1 Routing on Empirical Data (RED) Project

GOETZ RD = VISTA WAY. 48" MH No.14 60" MH No.13 EXIST. MH STA ± (TO BE REMOVED) S =

NATIONAL INDIAN JUSTICE CENTER 5250 Aero Drive Santa Rosa, CA (707) Fax: (707)

Regulated Medical Waste Management and Proper Waste Segregation. State-Specific Information California

The Economic Impact of California Specialty Crops A Regional Perspective. Lynn Hamilton 1 Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Department of Agribusiness

Trend results for racial groups are shown only for polls which had enough African-American respondents to produce statistically valid results.

Global Warming November 2007

PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment

SUPRC Maine Statewide August 2018

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Tuesday, October 25 at Noon

A Comprehensive Approach to Urban. Photo: Chris Doolittle

Appendix A: Water Availability Assessment

Welfare Client Data Systems (WCDS) Consortium Position Recruitment for: Project Manager Openings

Characteristics of Firearm-related Injuries

The Measure of California Agriculture, 2006 CHAPTER FIVE AGRICULTURE S ROLE IN THE ECONOMY

Agriculture plays a major role in shaping

MARIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION Mary Jane Burke. Marin County Superintendent of Schools

NEW YORK STATE Oct , 2010

Transcription:

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, California 94108 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Survey of California Registered Voters Regarding the Job Ratings of Governor Jerry Brown and Voter Preferences in the 2014 Open Primary Election for Governor Should Brown Decide to Run - prepared for the - Capitol Alert and the Sacramento Bee December 4, 2013

Introduction This volume presents the statistical data developed from a Field Poll survey of registered voters in California about their preferences in the 2014 open primary election for Governor should Jerry Brown choose to run for re-election. The survey was conducted by The Field Poll among a representative sample of 836 registered voters in California conducted by telephone in English and Spanish November 15 - December 3, 2013. In order to cover a broad range of issues and still minimize respondent fatigue, some of the questions in this report were asked of a random subsample of 424 voters. Sampling The sample was developed from telephone listings of individual voters selected randomly from a listing of statewide voter registration rolls. Once a voter s name and telephone had been selected, interviews are attempted only with the specified voter. Interviews can be conducted on either the voter s landline or cell phone, depending on the source of the telephone listing from the voter file and the preference of the voter. Prior to the start of data collection, professionally-trained telephone interviewers were briefed with regard to the survey s proper calling and interviewing procedures by the Study Director. This session provided both interviewers and supervisors with an overview of the study and includes a question-by-question review of all items in the survey. Interviewers then completed survey interviews by telephone through the computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system. CATI controls the telephone scripts read to individual respondents by displaying the appropriate questionnaire items and their valid response code alternatives in their proper sequence on computer screens at each interviewer's booth. The interviewer then reads each question aloud to the respondent from the screen and enters each respondent's pre-coded answer category through the keyboard directly to a computer disk. All answers are automatically stored in computer memory. In order to bring hard-to-reach respondents into the survey, up to six attempts (an initial call plus five callbacks) were made to each telephone number selected for inclusion into the sample. Callbacks were made at different times and on different days to

increase the probability of finding voters available for the interview. Where possible, appointments are made at specified dates and times to maximize convenience and cooperation rates. Data Processing The data file resulting from CATI interviewing is itself virtually error-free. Even so, a final series of data checks were performed by means of a specially designed cleaning program that scrutinizes each respondent record for internally inconsistent information. Once the data were determined to be clean and error-free, the overall sample was weighted to align it to its proper statewide proportions by demographic characteristics of the state s registered voter population. Guide to Reading the Tables The following is an explanation of the detailed statistical tabulations contained in this report: The question or questions upon which the data are based is shown at the top of each table Tables are percentaged vertically with the raw percentage base appearing at the top of each column. The data have been weighted to known parameters of the statewide registered voter population. All percentages and frequencies reported in each table are therefore weighted tabulations. In instances where percentages are calculated on small bases (e.g., when the base is fewer than 100 respondents) the reader is urged to interpret the data with caution, since results are subject to larger levels of sampling error. Throughout the tables an asterisk is used to denote a value of less than 1/2 of 1%. A hyphen indicates zero value. On some tables the percentages may add to more than 100% due to multiple mentions. Bases of subgroups used in the tabulations may add to less than the total number of respondents due to some respondents not reporting that characteristic.

Regional Definitions The following are some of the definitions applicable to some of the voter subgroups reported in this volume: Southern California: Northern California: Coastal Counties: Inland counties: Los Angeles: San Diego/Orange: Other South: SF Bay Area: Central Valley: Other North: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Imperial, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties all other 48 California counties San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Santa Clara, Mendocino, Humboldt and Del Norte counties all other 38 California counties Los Angeles County San Diego County and Orange counties San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehema, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Del Norte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Monterey, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity, and Tuolumne

Estimates of Sampling Error In any survey based on a sampling, there is some sampling error introduced into the data by the process of sampling itself. When the sample has been drawn using random processes, it is possible to apply probability principles to determine the potential range of such error. While survey samples of human populations rarely, if ever, meet all of the criteria theoretically required for the application of these principles, it is customary to use them as an approximation of error that is introduced as a result of sampling. The table below shows the range of error associated with samples of various sizes at the 95% confidence level, which is customary for most public opinion surveys. For example, if 50% of the overall sample of registered voters answered yes to a specific question, this statistic would have a sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This means that there is a 95% chance that had the overall population of registered voters statewide been interviewed using the same questionnaire and methods, the results of such a census would yield a result between 46.5% and 53.5%. The same procedure can be used to estimate the sample error ranges of any other statistic contained in this report. Approximate percentage distribution of replies to question Approximate sample size 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 100 +/- 6.0 +/- 9.2 +/- 10.0 +/- 9.2 +/- 6.0 300 +/- 3.5 +/- 5.3 +/- 5.8 +/- 5.3 +/- 3.5 500 +/- 2.7 +/- 4.1 +/- 4.5 +/- 4.1 +/- 2.7 800 +/- 2.1 +/- 3.2 +/- 3.5 +/- 3.2 +/- 2.1 1000 +/- 1.9 +/- 2.9 +/- 3.2 +/- 2.9 +/- 1.9 There are many other possible sources of error other than sampling variability in this and any other public opinion survey. The overall design and execution of the survey minimized the potential for these other sources of error.

Questions Asked Do you approve or disapprove of the way Jerry Brown is handling his job as Governor of California? I am going to read the names of some people who are considered to be candidates for Governor in next year s statewide election. As I read each name, please tell me whether your opinion of that person is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion. Is your opinion of (NAME AND TITLE) favorable or unfavorable? (NAMES AND TITLES READ IN RANDOM ORDER). (SEE RELEASE FOR NAMES READ)* The upcoming June statewide election will be an open primary. This means that candidates from all parties Democrats, Republicans and other parties will be listed together on one ballot and voters can chose to vote for a candidate from any party. I am going to read the names of some of the likely candidates for Governor next year and please tell me whom you would choose if the election were being held today. Suppose the choices were (NAMES AND PARTIES READ IN RANDOM ORDER). For whom would you vote if the election for Governor were being held today? * Asked of a random subsample of 424 registered voters. All other questions asked of the overall sample of 836 registered voters.

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q17. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Jerry Brown is handling his job as Governor of California? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 502 334 588 248 217 141 128 132 167 51 400 225 211 595 241 405 431 509 Weighted 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 APPROVE 479 277 202 349 130 137 70 66 72 113 22 287 64 129 359 121 222 258 289 57.7 55.5 61.0 59.7 52.9 61.4 51.1 52.4 52.9 65.9 57.7 77.5 26.8 57.7 60.8 50.2 58.4 57.1 58.5 DISAPPROVE 276 175 101 174 102 62 54 51 55 38 16 53 149 73 172 104 129 147 172 33.2 35.0 30.4 29.7 41.5 27.8 39.3 41.0 40.3 22.1 41.3 14.2 63.0 32.9 29.1 43.2 33.9 32.5 34.7 NO OPINION 76 47 28 62 14 24 13 8 9 21 * 30 24 21 60 16 29 47 34 9.1 9.5 8.6 10.6 5.6 10.8 9.6 6.6 6.7 12.0 1.0 8.2 10.2 9.4 10.1 6.6 7.7 10.3 6.8 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495 Respondents 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q17. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Jerry Brown is handling his job as Governor of California? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 138 153 100 228 217 475 200 57 90 148 112 320 94 132 226 597 478 154 187 Weighted 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 APPROVE 479 93 74 71 134 108 272 130 31 48 42 44 204 69 110 122 354 257 91 125 57.7 60.1 56.1 51.0 59.8 59.4 53.7 67.5 57.8 58.5 28.2 42.0 61.5 74.2 85.9 53.3 59.4 53.9 63.1 63.0 DISAPPROVE 276 37 46 58 77 58 189 45 17 25 93 50 103 12 7 87 186 185 43 46 33.2 23.8 34.6 41.8 34.3 32.2 37.3 23.6 32.4 29.9 63.0 46.9 31.1 12.5 5.9 38.0 31.3 38.7 29.4 22.9 NO OPINION 76 25 12 10 13 15 45 17 5 10 13 12 25 12 10 20 55 36 11 28 9.1 16.1 9.3 7.2 5.8 8.5 9.0 8.9 9.8 11.6 8.8 11.1 7.4 13.4 8.2 8.8 9.3 7.5 7.4 14.1 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198 Respondents 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q17. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Jerry Brown is handling his job as Governor of California? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 150 267 243 166 130 149 117 199 155 664 139 87 324 210 120 148 292 501 Weighted 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 APPROVE 479 86 126 158 107 74 77 68 123 89 377 82 57 139 134 87 103 114 348 57.7 58.8 48.9 62.0 63.9 56.4 58.5 59.3 61.6 53.2 56.8 60.7 60.8 42.7 62.3 74.4 69.6 37.8 70.8 DISAPPROVE 276 43 105 77 48 33 37 40 66 68 224 44 32 152 70 19 29 166 99 33.2 29.7 40.9 30.0 28.9 24.9 28.2 35.2 32.9 40.6 33.8 32.1 34.3 46.9 32.7 16.4 19.4 55.0 20.1 NO OPINION 76 17 26 20 12 25 18 6 11 10 62 10 5 34 11 11 16 22 45 9.1 11.5 10.2 7.9 7.2 18.7 13.3 5.5 5.4 6.2 9.4 7.2 4.9 10.4 5.0 9.2 11.0 7.2 9.1 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491 Respondents 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? a. Jerry Brown, Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 254 170 291 133 111 76 58 72 79 28 205 113 106 294 130 205 219 280 Weighted 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 238 140 97 165 73 68 30 39 35 54 11 144 25 69 182 55 98 140 157 56.0 55.6 56.6 56.6 54.7 61.5 43.0 62.1 50.1 61.8 48.5 77.5 20.2 59.5 61.4 43.5 49.2 62.0 56.8 UNFAVORABLE 156 96 60 101 55 30 39 23 30 25 10 27 90 38 89 67 87 69 112 36.8 38.2 34.8 34.6 41.7 27.0 54.9 36.0 43.1 28.3 45.4 14.8 73.6 33.0 30.1 52.4 43.9 30.6 40.3 NO OPINION 30 15 15 26 5 13 2 1 5 9 1 14 8 9 25 5 14 17 8 7.2 6.1 8.7 8.8 3.6 11.5 2.2 1.9 6.9 10.0 6.1 7.7 6.1 7.4 8.5 4.1 6.9 7.4 2.9 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 Respondents 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? a. Jerry Brown, Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 61 77 56 118 112 233 103 32 55 71 66 157 52 64 123 298 238 86 93 Weighted 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 238 45 38 37 65 53 132 65 16 28 19 22 92 40 59 58 178 128 49 58 56.0 56.7 56.1 51.8 56.1 58.6 51.0 66.3 61.7 61.9 29.2 34.6 56.0 72.9 91.6 48.9 58.7 53.2 64.0 56.5 UNFAVORABLE 156 21 21 30 50 34 111 26 7 13 42 39 55 10 4 50 107 102 25 28 36.8 26.5 31.4 42.7 42.9 37.5 42.7 26.4 28.3 28.9 66.6 60.2 33.4 18.3 5.7 41.6 35.1 42.4 32.4 27.1 NO OPINION 30 13 8 4 1 4 16 7 3 4 3 3 18 5 2 11 19 11 3 17 7.2 16.8 12.5 5.5 1.0 3.9 6.3 7.3 9.9 9.2 4.2 5.1 10.7 8.7 2.7 9.6 6.2 4.4 3.7 16.4 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 Respondents 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? a. Jerry Brown, Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 81 144 114 82 74 82 63 84 82 339 70 50 174 100 51 82 152 252 Weighted 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 238 36 71 78 51 41 45 34 56 42 183 47 35 67 61 43 56 58 174 56.0 45.8 53.0 63.2 59.3 54.9 62.8 54.7 66.0 47.2 54.5 63.7 61.9 38.9 61.9 80.4 66.9 37.9 68.9 UNFAVORABLE 156 36 51 38 32 22 20 25 27 44 126 24 19 93 33 5 21 90 59 36.8 44.9 38.0 30.7 36.9 29.8 27.7 40.4 32.0 48.8 37.7 33.1 34.0 54.0 34.0 9.4 24.8 58.4 23.5 NO OPINION 30 7 12 8 3 11 7 3 2 4 26 2 2 12 4 6 7 6 19 7.2 9.3 9.1 6.1 3.8 15.2 9.5 5.0 2.0 4.0 7.9 3.2 4.1 7.1 4.1 10.2 8.3 3.7 7.6 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 Respondents 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? b. Tim Donnelly, Assemblyman Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 254 170 291 133 111 76 58 72 79 28 205 113 106 294 130 205 219 280 Weighted 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 50 34 17 31 19 11 9 11 7 10 2 22 19 9 27 24 29 22 29 11.8 13.3 9.6 10.6 14.6 9.7 13.3 17.3 10.2 10.8 11.0 11.8 15.8 7.6 8.9 18.5 14.4 9.6 10.6 UNFAVORABLE 35 23 11 23 12 13 5 5 6 5 * 18 5 11 26 9 16 18 19 8.2 9.3 6.5 7.9 8.8 11.6 7.2 8.6 8.7 5.6 1.2 10.0 4.4 9.2 8.7 7.0 8.2 8.1 6.9 NO OPINION 339 195 144 238 102 87 56 47 56 74 19 145 98 96 244 95 153 186 229 80.0 77.4 83.8 81.6 76.6 78.7 79.4 74.1 81.0 83.6 87.8 78.2 79.7 83.2 82.4 74.5 77.4 82.3 82.6 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 Respondents 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? b. Tim Donnelly, Assemblyman Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 61 77 56 118 112 233 103 32 55 71 66 157 52 64 123 298 238 86 93 Weighted 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 50 8 8 11 9 13 27 13 5 5 13 8 19 8 1 15 35 29 10 10 11.8 10.6 11.5 16.2 7.9 14.7 10.6 13.3 19.0 11.5 20.6 12.6 11.5 14.3 1.3 12.5 11.6 12.2 13.4 10.2 UNFAVORABLE 35 9 5 8 11 3 6 14 8 10 2 11 15 2 3 17 18 15 5 13 8.2 10.9 6.7 11.1 9.2 3.3 2.5 14.1 30.4 21.1 3.0 16.9 9.1 4.4 5.3 14.2 5.8 6.4 7.1 12.9 NO OPINION 339 62 55 51 96 75 226 72 13 30 49 45 131 44 61 87 251 195 61 79 80.0 78.5 81.8 72.8 82.8 82.1 87.0 72.6 50.6 67.4 76.4 70.5 79.4 81.3 93.4 73.3 82.6 81.3 79.4 76.9 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 Respondents 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? b. Tim Donnelly, Assemblyman Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 81 144 114 82 74 82 63 84 82 339 70 50 174 100 51 82 152 252 Weighted 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 50 13 12 15 10 11 10 8 5 10 33 13 9 29 15 3 4 25 24 11.8 16.5 9.0 11.8 12.0 14.3 13.7 13.1 5.3 10.7 9.8 18.2 15.8 16.7 15.1 5.2 4.4 16.2 9.7 UNFAVORABLE 35 5 14 10 6 4 7 4 7 9 29 3 3 13 8 7 6 13 21 8.2 6.6 10.1 8.3 6.4 5.9 10.4 6.0 7.9 9.7 8.7 4.5 5.8 7.5 8.2 12.4 7.1 8.6 8.3 NO OPINION 339 61 108 98 70 60 55 50 74 72 273 57 44 131 75 44 74 116 207 80.0 76.9 80.8 79.9 81.5 79.8 75.9 81.0 86.8 79.6 81.5 77.3 78.4 75.9 76.6 82.5 88.6 75.2 82.1 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 Respondents 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? c. Abel Maldonado, former Lt. Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 254 170 291 133 111 76 58 72 79 28 205 113 106 294 130 205 219 280 Weighted 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 76 49 27 55 21 26 11 12 11 14 2 39 22 15 62 14 48 28 42 17.9 19.4 15.6 18.9 15.6 23.4 15.5 19.3 16.2 15.8 7.7 21.1 18.0 12.7 21.0 10.7 24.0 12.5 15.0 UNFAVORABLE 83 49 35 58 26 17 14 17 14 20 3 29 28 26 56 28 46 37 57 19.7 19.3 20.2 19.9 19.3 15.0 19.8 26.3 19.9 22.3 12.8 15.9 22.6 22.7 18.8 21.7 23.2 16.6 20.7 NO OPINION 265 154 110 178 86 68 46 34 44 55 18 117 73 75 178 86 105 160 178 62.4 61.2 64.2 61.2 65.1 61.6 64.7 54.4 64.0 61.9 79.4 63.1 59.4 64.6 60.2 67.6 52.8 70.9 64.3 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 Respondents 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? c. Abel Maldonado, former Lt. Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 61 77 56 118 112 233 103 32 55 71 66 157 52 64 123 298 238 86 93 Weighted 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 76 17 6 13 24 15 39 26 4 7 11 13 33 7 9 18 57 48 12 16 17.9 21.5 9.4 18.9 20.7 16.7 14.9 26.3 16.7 16.0 18.0 19.5 20.3 13.7 13.5 15.5 18.9 19.8 15.2 15.7 UNFAVORABLE 83 7 9 16 30 21 52 16 7 10 16 14 37 8 6 25 58 48 19 15 19.7 9.4 13.3 23.0 25.8 23.0 20.2 16.4 28.5 21.2 24.5 21.4 22.7 13.8 9.6 21.0 19.2 19.9 24.6 14.9 NO OPINION 265 54 52 41 62 55 169 56 14 28 37 38 94 40 50 76 188 145 46 72 62.4 69.1 77.3 58.1 53.5 60.4 64.9 57.3 54.7 62.8 57.5 59.0 57.1 72.5 76.9 63.6 61.9 60.3 60.2 69.4 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 Respondents 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? c. Abel Maldonado, former Lt. Govenor Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 81 144 114 82 74 82 63 84 82 339 70 50 174 100 51 82 152 252 Weighted 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 76 25 16 23 11 14 13 8 20 11 62 6 4 26 28 8 9 25 48 17.9 31.7 12.2 18.3 12.8 19.2 17.6 13.0 23.0 12.3 18.6 8.6 7.2 15.0 28.6 14.6 10.9 16.2 18.8 UNFAVORABLE 83 18 27 14 25 10 18 13 14 24 66 16 9 38 18 12 13 38 41 19.7 22.5 20.1 11.1 29.0 13.2 24.7 21.3 16.5 26.9 19.7 21.4 16.4 21.8 18.7 22.1 15.1 24.7 16.2 NO OPINION 265 36 91 87 50 50 42 40 52 55 207 51 43 109 52 34 62 91 164 62.4 45.8 67.6 70.6 58.2 67.5 57.7 65.7 60.5 60.8 61.7 70.0 76.4 63.2 52.7 63.3 74.0 59.1 65.0 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 Respondents 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? d. Neel Kashkari, Treasury Dept. Official Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 254 170 291 133 111 76 58 72 79 28 205 113 106 294 130 205 219 280 Weighted 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 37 29 8 24 13 12 8 7 6 4 1 21 12 4 21 16 25 12 15 8.7 11.4 4.9 8.4 9.5 10.7 11.5 11.1 8.0 4.0 4.0 11.4 9.8 3.3 7.0 12.6 12.5 5.4 5.4 UNFAVORABLE 34 24 11 23 11 12 6 6 3 4 4 12 7 15 26 8 22 13 17 8.1 9.4 6.2 8.0 8.3 10.6 8.3 9.6 4.7 4.3 16.3 6.6 5.9 12.7 8.9 6.3 10.9 5.7 6.0 NO OPINION 353 200 153 244 109 87 57 50 60 81 18 152 103 97 249 103 152 201 245 83.2 79.2 89.0 83.6 82.3 78.7 80.2 79.2 87.3 91.7 79.7 82.0 84.3 84.0 84.1 81.1 76.7 88.9 88.5 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277 Respondents 424 252 172 291 133 111 71 63 69 88 22 185 123 116 296 128 198 226 277

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? d. Neel Kashkari, Treasury Dept. Official Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 61 77 56 118 112 233 103 32 55 71 66 157 52 64 123 298 238 86 93 Weighted 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 37 11 3 8 9 7 11 14 2 10 11 11 10 4 2 11 26 17 7 13 8.7 13.8 3.9 11.2 7.5 7.5 4.3 14.6 9.6 21.4 16.8 16.5 5.8 7.4 3.3 9.0 8.6 7.0 9.3 12.7 UNFAVORABLE 34 10 7 4 7 7 13 15 4 1 2 10 15 2 2 15 19 17 5 11 8.1 12.5 10.5 5.6 5.7 7.5 5.2 15.1 16.5 2.4 3.6 16.0 9.2 4.0 2.8 12.5 6.4 7.2 6.5 10.7 NO OPINION 353 58 58 59 100 77 235 69 19 34 51 43 140 48 61 94 258 206 64 79 83.2 73.7 85.6 83.2 86.8 85.0 90.5 70.3 73.8 76.1 79.6 67.4 85.0 88.5 93.9 78.5 85.0 85.8 84.1 76.6 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103 Respondents 424 79 68 71 116 91 260 99 26 45 64 64 165 55 65 119 304 240 76 103

Q22. Is your opinion of [candidate] favorable or unfavorable? d. Neel Kashkari, Treasury Dept. Official Base: Registered voter (Form B) Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 424 81 144 114 82 74 82 63 84 82 339 70 50 174 100 51 82 152 252 Weighted 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 FAVORABLE 37 14 10 9 4 6 9 2 7 7 27 5 4 15 12 6 3 23 13 8.7 17.2 7.4 7.0 4.8 7.7 12.3 2.5 8.4 7.6 8.1 6.9 7.4 8.9 12.5 10.8 4.0 15.0 5.2 UNFAVORABLE 34 17 8 3 5 4 7 8 6 2 21 11 6 16 8-7 15 17 8.1 22.0 6.3 2.8 5.8 4.7 10.0 13.0 7.6 2.6 6.3 14.5 11.5 9.2 8.3-8.1 9.9 6.9 NO OPINION 353 48 116 111 77 65 56 52 72 81 287 57 45 141 78 48 74 115 222 83.2 60.8 86.3 90.2 89.4 87.6 77.7 84.5 84.0 89.8 85.5 78.6 81.1 81.9 79.2 89.2 87.9 75.1 87.9 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253 Respondents 424 79 134 123 86 75 72 62 85 90 335 73 56 173 98 54 84 154 253

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q23. I am going to read the names of some of the likely candidates for Governor next year and please tell me who you would choose if the election were being held today. Suppose the choices were [Candidates below]. For whom would you vote if the election for Governor were being held today? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Region Area Party Regis. Congres- Gender Like- ----------------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- sional ----------- ly District June Orng/ Cen- S.F. Non- Party Seat Prim- South North In- San Other tral Bay Other Part/ ----------- Fe- ary Total Cal Cal Coast land LA Diego South Vally Area North Dem Rep Other Dem Rep Male male Voter ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 502 334 588 248 217 141 128 132 167 51 400 225 211 595 241 405 431 509 Weighted 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Jerry Brown, 435 249 186 327 107 133 58 51 63 109 21 290 40 106 344 91 190 245 261 Democrat 52.4 49.8 56.2 56.0 43.7 59.6 42.6 40.6 46.5 63.6 53.9 78.2 16.7 47.3 58.4 37.6 49.9 54.4 52.8 Tim Donnelly, 78 52 26 54 25 15 22 12 10 14 5 8 47 23 45 33 33 45 53 Republican 9.4 10.4 7.9 9.2 10.0 6.7 16.4 9.9 7.6 7.9 11.9 2.2 20.0 10.2 7.7 13.6 8.7 10.0 10.7 Abel Maldonado, 89 54 35 54 35 17 8 27 18 17 2 20 49 20 60 29 52 37 51 Republican 10.7 10.8 10.5 9.2 14.3 7.4 6.1 21.4 13.5 9.8 5.6 5.5 20.7 8.8 10.1 12.2 13.7 8.2 10.2 Neel Kashkari, 22 13 9 13 10 8 1 3 8 2-3 7 12 17 5 10 13 10 Republican 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.2 4.0 3.5 1.1 2.3 5.9 1.2-0.8 2.9 5.6 3.0 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.0 NO OPINION/ 206 132 75 137 69 51 46 33 36 30 11 49 94 63 123 83 95 111 121 UNDECIDED 24.8 26.3 22.6 23.5 28.1 22.7 33.8 25.9 26.5 17.5 28.6 13.4 39.7 28.1 20.9 34.6 25.1 24.7 24.3 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495 Respondents 831 500 331 585 246 223 137 125 135 172 39 370 237 223 590 241 380 451 495

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q23. I am going to read the names of some of the likely candidates for Governor next year and please tell me who you would choose if the election were being held today. Suppose the choices were [Candidates below]. For whom would you vote if the election for Governor were being held today? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Age Ethnicity Political ideology Marital Status ----------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------- Parent of ----------------- child under Mar- White Strng Mod. Mid. 18 ried/ non- Asian Con- Con- of Mod. Strng ----------- Live Sprtd Never 65 or Hisp- La- / serv- serv- the lib- lib- toge- Dvecd Mar- Total 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 Older anic tino Black Other ative ative Road eral eral Yes No ther Widwd ried ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 138 153 100 228 217 475 200 57 90 148 112 320 94 132 226 597 478 154 187 Weighted 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Jerry Brown, 435 77 72 73 124 89 248 111 37 42 28 34 167 74 121 112 317 228 90 112 Democrat 52.4 49.7 54.6 52.8 55.1 49.1 49.1 57.7 70.0 50.6 19.0 31.9 50.6 79.0 94.6 49.1 53.3 47.6 62.1 56.3 Tim Donnelly, 78 16 8 17 21 16 59 11 3 5 37 18 18 2 1 16 61 42 13 23 Republican 9.4 10.5 5.8 12.5 9.5 8.6 11.6 5.8 5.3 5.5 25.0 16.8 5.5 2.6 1.0 7.1 10.2 8.8 9.1 11.4 Abel Maldonado, 89 12 13 19 22 22 46 37 3 5 20 15 49 1 2 35 54 62 12 15 Republican 10.7 8.1 9.6 14.1 9.9 12.2 9.1 19.1 4.7 5.7 13.8 14.3 14.9 0.7 1.4 15.5 9.0 13.0 8.0 7.8 Neel Kashkari, 22 6 6 5 4 2 15 2 2 3 8 6 8 1-7 15 16 1 5 Republican 2.7 3.7 4.7 3.3 1.6 1.2 3.0 1.0 3.3 3.9 5.1 5.2 2.5 0.9-3.2 2.5 3.4 0.5 2.6 NO OPINION/ 206 43 33 24 54 52 138 32 9 28 55 34 88 16 4 57 149 130 29 43 UNDECIDED 24.8 28.0 25.2 17.4 23.9 28.8 27.2 16.4 16.6 34.3 37.1 31.8 26.4 16.8 3.1 25.0 25.0 27.1 20.3 21.9 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198 Respondents 831 154 132 139 224 182 506 192 53 83 147 106 331 94 127 228 595 478 144 198

Late November/Early December 2013 Field Poll Q23. I am going to read the names of some of the likely candidates for Governor next year and please tell me who you would choose if the election were being held today. Suppose the choices were [Candidates below]. For whom would you vote if the election for Governor were being held today? Base : Interviews of registered voters collected from 11/15/2013. Union Affiliated Education Household Income Household Religion Tea Party ----------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------- ID H.S. Some Yes ----------- Grad- Col- Post ----------- Prot/ uate lege/ Col- Grad- Less More Publc Other No Not or Trade lege uate Than $20 $40- $60- Than Empl- Chris Cath- Pref- A lot at Total less Schol Grad Work -20K -40K -60K -100K $100K No Total oyee -tian olic Other ence /some all ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Unweighted 836 150 267 243 166 130 149 117 199 155 664 139 87 324 210 120 148 292 501 Weighted 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Jerry Brown, 435 73 111 146 103 80 75 56 118 77 351 69 49 119 105 89 103 78 343 Democrat 52.4 49.8 43.2 57.3 61.5 60.7 56.8 48.8 59.0 45.9 52.9 50.7 52.2 36.7 49.2 76.1 69.7 25.9 69.8 Tim Donnelly, 78 14 24 20 18 9 10 12 16 18 63 11 6 48 20 3 6 58 16 Republican 9.4 9.9 9.5 7.8 10.7 6.7 7.8 10.8 8.0 10.9 9.5 7.9 6.2 14.8 9.1 2.2 4.0 19.3 3.3 Abel Maldonado, 89 21 31 31 6 11 7 21 22 17 67 21 15 36 41 5 6 44 40 Republican 10.7 14.4 12.2 12.0 3.6 8.2 5.3 18.1 11.0 10.3 10.0 15.2 16.6 11.2 18.9 4.4 4.0 14.7 8.2 Neel Kashkari, 22 1 9 4 8 3 4 2-12 16 5 4 10 5 4 3 15 8 Republican 2.7 0.8 3.5 1.6 4.5 2.6 3.1 1.6-7.4 2.5 3.9 4.2 3.0 2.5 3.6 2.2 4.9 1.5 NO OPINION/ 206 37 82 54 33 29 36 24 44 43 167 30 19 111 44 16 30 106 84 UNDECIDED 24.8 25.1 31.7 21.3 19.7 21.8 27.1 20.7 22.1 25.5 25.1 22.3 20.9 34.3 20.3 13.7 20.1 35.2 17.1 Adds to: ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Rows 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491 Respondents 831 146 257 255 167 131 131 115 200 167 664 136 93 325 214 116 148 302 491