Port Capacity Analysis in Long Beach. Matt Plezia, POLB and Vaibhav Govil, AECOM TRB Irvine, CA June 29, 2010

Similar documents
AAPA Harbors, Navigation and Environment Seminar Vancouver, B.C.

White Paper on the Terminal Capacity of Pier 300 with the Automation of the 41-acre Backland at Proposed Berth 306

Growth In Container Volumes

Operations Analysis using Simulation Modeling to Evaluate Capacity Requirements. for Direct Intermodal Rail Facilities at the Port of Long Beach

... Terminal of the Future in San Pedro Bay. by Ashebir Jacob Larry Nye Moffatt & Nichol

AAPA. Port Operations/Safety and Information Technology Seminar

Process for Port Master Planning

Technical Memorandum 3 Executive Summary Existing Conditions and Constraints Presentation. March 22, 2006

The Use of Simulation for Bulk Cargo Terminal Planning and Design

Port of Los Angeles Presentation to the Los Angeles Investors Conference March 19, 2018

Capacity Planning System

Container Terminal Planning & Operations Current and Coming Trends

1.7 Berthing Analysis

RTSA Technical Session

Sustainability in Port Engineering Douglas J. Sereno Director of Program Management

Berths [Everport] Container Terminal Improvements Project Draft EIS/EIR Public Meeting

Gateway Infrastructure Development Programs in Urban Centers on the west coast of North America

JLTOC Update. October 7, 2016

Port Cooperation Agreements Propelling Capital Projects

Intermodal Handling TOP PERFORMANCE WITH SMART SOLUTIONS

RDEIR/SDEIS Traffic Forecasting Key Assumptions Update

RDEIR/SDEIS Traffic Forecasting Key Assumptions Update

Scenario-based simulation of revenue loss at seismically damaged seaports

A Framework for Integrating Planning Activities in Container Terminals

Accommodating Mega-Ships at Existing Wharves

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

Infrastructure Victoria. Second Container Port Advice Estimated Capacity of the Port of Melbourne

PLANNING, DESIGN, and REALIZATION OF AUTOMATED TERMINALS Ashebir Jacob P.E. Senior Port Engineer / Vice President

Container terminal planning Experiences & lessons learnt

3.6 GROUND TRANSPORTATION

Container Terminal Simulation with Flexsim CT

The Operating Concept Peter Beamish, MA MICE Technical Director, Royal HaskoningDHV

New Container Terminal Development for a Proposed Area

High Volume, High Velocity Intermodal Operations

Port of Los Angeles. America s Port Harbor Transportation Club June 20, 2013 Kathryn McDermott

CHESSCON Capacity. Capacity planning for container terminals

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Chapter 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

Packer Avenue Marine Terminal operator:

PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY

Administrative Draft Predecisional Do Not Cite

PORT OF SAVANNAH. Garden City Terminal: The Southeast Gateway for the U.S.

CAAP Stakeholder Meeting April 7, 2010

1.1 Background Project Location and Brief Project Overview. Chapter 1 Introduction

MARINE TERMINAL AUTOMATION FINDING THE RIGHT FIT

American Patriot Holdings LLC & PPHTD Creating Inland Marine Innovation

Port Re-Development Look At Our Future Now. By Delfina Duarté October 24, 2006

Congo (D. R.) Ports description

Container Transfer Logistics at Multimodal Container Terminals

CANADA S GATEWAYS: SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE MONITORING INITIATIVES. Leipzig, May 2, 2012

Ports and the battle for Perishables. Sao Paulo, May

Gene Seroka Executive Director Port of Los Angeles Port Outlook

Improved Inland Rail Transport Through New Concepts for Intermodal Hubs

OOCL Symposium. Norman Stark, President &CEO. Toronto, Ontario. GCT Global Container Terminals Inc. Vanterm and Deltaport. British Columbia, Canada

TPM Asia Conference 2013 Port Productivity

Sustainability and Environmental Stewardship. Environment

Driving Our Ports Toward Greater Efficiency Gene Seroka, Executive Director Port of Los Angeles

Alabama State Port Authority

INTE-TRANSIT 3 rd Training Workshop Strategic Roadmap to 2020 for Piraeus Container Terminal

Port Partnerships Strategic Opportunities for Gateway & Closer Market Ports to Work Together Presented by Rainer Lilienthal General Manager-Trade

Optimization of Terminal Operations September 23, Navis, LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation and Long Term Funding Solutions. November 6, 2017

Environmental Management Division, Port of Los Angeles

State of Our Port and Intermodal Freight Systems

Port Everglades Master/Vision Plan Update Stakeholder Meeting. January 28, 2010

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Background Project Location and Brief Project Overview

THE VESSEL TURNAROUND TIME: THE CASE OF SEPANGAR BAY CONTAINER PORT (SBCP) Heather Valarie Benilus

Opportunity for Private Investment Mauritius Island Container Terminal

Global Supply Chain Management: Seattle-Tacoma

ON-OFF TERMINAL SHIP- TO-RAIL TRANSFER. Asaf Asharl

Facilities Guide NORTH & SOUTH HARBORS S E AT T L E TAC O M A, U. S. A.

CESPL-RG 16 February 2010

Understanding Existing Conditions

PORT OF LONG BEACH SCREENING ANALYSIS OF CONTAINER TERMINAL OPTIONS

MICA October 10, 2018

MARITIME DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE STUDY PORT OF OAKLAND

Performance Measure Evaluation of Port Truck Trip Reduction Strategies

Section 4 Vessel Charges/Cargo Charges

An Overview of Import Supply Chains

Part 3: Concepts and methods for designing and operating dry ports

Port of Philadelphia Port Advisory Board

Movements in capacity share have been tracked and the events leading to change are given authoritative comment.

2017 Facilities Engineering Awards: Design and Construction of Marine Structures. Title of Project Mississippi River Intermodal Terminal Improvements

APM Terminals Nigeria

CLASS I RAIL CSX & Norfolk Southern

CLASS I RAIL CSX & Norfolk Southern

Space-Sharing Strategy for Building Dynamic Container Yard Storage Considering Uncertainty on Number of Incoming Containers

GUAM PORTS OF ENTRY. Presented By: CMTF Ports & Customs Subcommittee. Carlos H. Salas Deputy Executive Manager. Kenneth Tagawa General Manager

Optimizing a Containership Stowage Plan. using a modified Differential Evolution algorithm

Terminal 5 Improvements

American Association of Port Authorities Harbors & Navigation Committee September 27, 2018

Trade Update & Opportunity Outlook. Gene Seroka Executive Director, Port of Los Angeles May 19, 2017

logistica portuale: come ridurre i costi e Ing. Marco Fehmer Contship Italia Group

Challenges of Developing a Logistics Hub. Dr. H. Donald Ratliff Regents Professor of Logistics Executive Director Supply Chain & Logistics Institute

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT. Port of Tacoma GCP Uplands Modernization Program. Throughput and Truck Trip Forecasts. Date: March 30, 2018

(America) LLC. The Impact of Super Container Ships & VSAs. Todd Rives SVP & CCO

EUROGATE Container Terminal Limassol Limited

EUROGATE Container Terminal Limassol Limited

Container shipping: impact of mega-containerships on ports in Europe and the Med

Definition of Terms. Anchorage A place with sufficient depth of water where vessels anchor within the harbour. (QMS 2016)

Transcription:

Port Capacity Analysis in Long Beach Matt Plezia, POLB and Vaibhav Govil, AECOM TRB Irvine, CA June 29, 2010 1

About the Port of Long Beach 2 Second busiest container port in N. America 7 container terminals covering 1,350 acres 2009 throughput of 5 million TEU 2007 peak throughput of 7.4 million TEU

Why does POLB Care about Terminal Capacity? Build efficient terminals Plan for projected cargo growth and inform terminal development decisions Build efficient support infrastructure: road+rail Understand environmental impacts and need for mitigation 3

Recent History of Capacity Analysis at POLB Early 2000s and before: projects analyzed on a case by case basis with little comparison or detailed explanation of assumptions Pier J South EIR scuttled in fall of 2004 Environmental QA/QC process involving third-party review of methodologies Develop a general methodology for terminal capacity estimation which provides: Consistent analysis for all Port terminals and proposed projects Reasonable but conservative estimate of overall terminal capacity Terminal specific throughput estimates over time Terminal specific vessel activity 4

Related Studies SPB Long Term Cargo Forecasts (1998, 2007, 2009) Expected cargo volumes Expected mode splits (i.e., local vs. intermodal) Mercator Vessel Forecast (2006) Number of weekly services calling at SPB Expected range of vessel sizes Number of box-moves for each vessel category Air emissions factors for each vessel category 5

Overall POLB Capacity Analysis Procedure Identify future terminal layout Calculate container yard (CY) capacity with spreadsheets Develop an example vessel schedule based on Mercator distribution with volume similar to CY capacity Analyze vessel schedule with Bertha statistical model If less than 5% queuing, terminal will be limited by CY capacity If more than 5% queuing, remove one vessel and re-analyze, repeat until vessel queuing is under 5% threshold terminal will be berth constrained Report overall capacity as lesser of CY or berth capacity 6

Long Term Trends in POLB Operations Larger ships with more cranes assigned Longer working hours when terminals are busy (21 vs. 16 hr) Shorter container dwell times Fewer containers stored on wheels (prior to recent downturn) Use of taller equipment to enable higher mean stack heights 7

Container Yard Capacity : Spreadsheet Analysis Area available for CY operations Cargo handling equipment (e.g., RTG vs. RMG) Mix of container types and dwell times Base operating assumptions reflect modest change from current operations. Continue RTG operations at most terminals Reduced wheeled storage Higher density from higher stacking (e.g.,1/5 RTG) Modest decrease in expected dwell times (vs. 2005) Resulting density reaches 10,000+ TEU per gross terminal acre per year at capacity. 8

Berth Capacity Assumptions Terminal specific vessel allocations Vessel discharge rates (moves per vessel call) Increase crane productivity, up to 33 moves per hour Use up to 7 cranes on largest vessels Vessel activity more evenly distributed through the week Capacity determined by expected delay/vessel queuing (simulation of vessel arrivals and dwell times) 9

Why can t berths run at 100% Occupancy Tradeoff with service vessels get off schedule primarily due to weather Big ships that call POLB are very expensive to delay Berths must run relatively light to ensure no delay 5% max queuing during peak season set as POLB target Different at Transshipment hubs like Singapore where small barges will queue for any open space 10

Historical Arrival Reliability at San Pedro Terminals 60% 120% 50% 100% Probability 40% 30% 20% 80% 60% 40% Cumulative Probability 10% 20% 0% 0 8 24 48 Hours Late 0% 11 Probability CumProb

BERTHA - Statistical Model of Berth Utilization INPUT: Vessel call schedule Vessel arrival variability Vessel length Dock crane assignment OUTPUT Probabilistic data on Wharf and dock crane demand over time Likelihood that a certain value will be exceeded 12

Vessel Inputs / Mercator Results Schedules for specific terminals were selected from port-wide Mercator distribution 13 Vessel Category Mercator Weekly SPB Services Total Lifts per Call Terminal Projected Weekly Services Annual Throughput at Capacity (TEU) 1000-1999 1 600 - - 2000-2999 9 1,450 - - 3000-3999 10 2,200 - - 4000-4999 23 1,800 2 346,320 5000-5999 16 4,000 1 384,800 6000-6999 15 5,300 1 509,860 7000-7999 12 6,200 1 596,440 8000-9999 11 6,820 1 656,084 10000-11999 11 8,550 1 822,510 Total 108 7 3,316,014

Mercator Estimate of Vessel Calls at POLB 25 23 20 No. of Vessels / Week 15 10 9 10 16 15 12 11 11 5 1 1,500 2,500 3,500 4,500 5,500 6,500 7,500 9,000 11,000 14 Mean Vessel Size (TEU)

Total Length vs. Mean Vessel Size 1,400 1,300 1,200 LOA + Gap (ft) 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 15 Mean Vesel Size (TEU)

Vessels Occupy Berth Space for Mooring Lines Vessel 1 Beam Vessel 2 45 45 45 45 45 45 Dock Beam ~ Gap A vessel with length overall (LOA) of 1000 and Beam of 100 will occupy 1100 of berth 16

Example Terminal Weekly Schedule - Ten Vessels 0 Mon 24 Tues 48 Wed 72 Thurs 96 Fri 120 Sat 144 Sun 168 1355 1355 1205 1205 1197 1197 Vessel LOA + Gap 1130 1050 1055 920 1055 1130 920 1050 1130 1130 1050 1050 1055 1055 17 Call Duration Possible Delay

Berth Length vs. % of Time w Vessels Queued w Ten Vessels 50% Fraction of time per week that total vessel length exceeds X axis value 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Vessels will be queued 4% of the time w ten vessels 0% 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 Total feet of vessels + gaps Total Vessel Length Total Berth Length 18

Conclusions Robust, easily explainable capacity analyses are a big advantage in EIRs and in other planning efforts Analysis is an iterative process Revisions need to keep up with new technology and new projects Revised vessel forecasts Revised dwell time data On-terminal rail Automated RMG systems Dedicated zero-emission transport systems between POLB and nearby railyards 19

20 Thank You

Contact Information Matt Plezia The Port of Long Beach 925 Harbor Plaza Long Beach CA, 90802 Phone: 562-590-4158 Email: Plezia@polb.com Web: www.polb.com Vaibhav Govil AECOM 2101 Webster St. Oakland CA, 94612 Phone: 510-844-0561 Email: vaibhav.govil@aecom.com Web: www.aecom.com 21