Buy Local, Buy Quality

Similar documents
Assessment of the Treatability of Small-Diameter Grand Fir Posts

Colorado Front Range Fuel Photo Series

Harvest, Employment, Exports, and Prices in Pacific Northwest Forests,

Softwood Lumber Prices for Evaluation of Small-Diameter Timber Stands in the Intermountain West

Mountain pine beetle attack in ponderosa pine: Comparing methods for rating susceptibility

Role of Construction Debris in Release of Copper, Chromium, and Arsenic From Treated Wood Structures

Treatability of Underutilized Northeastern Species with CCA and Alternative Wood Preservatives

Ten-Year Performance of Treated Northeastern Softwoods in Aboveground and Ground-Contact Exposures

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Factors Affecting Oxidative Stain in Soft Maple (Acer rubrum L.)

Forest Resources of the Lolo National Forest

Unique Operational Characteristics of Creosote, Pentachlorophenol, and Chromated Copper Arsenate as Wood Pole and Cross-Arm Preservatives

Texas, Forest Inventory & Analysis Factsheet. James W. Bentley. Forested Area. Introduction. Inventory Volume

Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth

Stake Tests of Northeastern Species Treated with Copperbased Preservatives: Five-Year Results

Engineering Watershed, Soil, & Air

Criterion 6, Indicator 30: Value and Volume in Round Wood Equivalents of Exports and Imports of Wood Products


Detection and analysis of the stress relaxation properties of thin wood composites using cantileverbeam

Wheat Objective Yield Survey Data,

Financial Analysis of Fuel Treatments on National Forests in the Western United States

Effect of Prestain on the Release Rate of Copper, Chromium, and Arsenic From Western Hemlock

Agroforestry Treasures in the USDA Farm Bill

Users Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser

~ouble- iff usioi Methods

Plans for Crash-Tested Bridge Railings for Longitudinal Wood Decks on Low-Volume Roads

Winter Wheat Seedings

National Soil Health Initiative

Seasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

An Overview of the U.S. Wood Preserving Industry

DECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting

Stonewall Vegetation Project FEIS Errata

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Lake Fire Restoration and Hazardous Tree Removal. Project Proposed Action and Scoping Document

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

Decision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements

Agricultural Land Values

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

Fruit Wildlife Damage

Evaluating Shrinkage of Wood Propellers in a High-Temperature Environment

U.S. Forest Facts and Historical Trends

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

DECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )

Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension

Wood that Works, Wood that Lasts Western Wood Preservers Institute

Production per cow in the 23 major States averaged 1,830 pounds for July, 59 pounds above July 2009.

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

Farms and Land in Farms

Telegraph Forest Management Project

U.S. Broiler Industry Structure

U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER FPL 124 OCTOBER 1969 SAPWOOD THICKNESS. of douglas-fir and five other western softwoods

Winter Wheat Seedings

The Wildland Fire Chemical

Carson National Forest El Rito Ranger District El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013.

Decision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project

Georgia, Forest Inventory & Analysis Factsheet. Richard A. Harper. Timberland Area and Live-Tree Volume by Survey

American Firewood Producers and Distributors Association

Little or no change has occurred to planting tools in

Andy Trent, Project Leader; Tyler Kuhn, Mechanical Engineer; Karen Burr, Horticulturist, Coeur d Alene Nursery

Sparta Vegetation Management Project

Cattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent

Woodland Planning for Success

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2011 Summary

Weaving Knowledge. How traditional and scientific knowledge can contribute to management of good beargrass harvesting sites for basketry


Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

Farm Computer Usage and Ownership

Capacity and Capability of Mills in the Flathead National Forest Timber-Processing Area

EVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION

North Carolina, 2010

Tree Survival 15 Years after the Ice Storm of January 1998

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. September 2014

Environmental Assessment for Jackson Thinning

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Down 6 Percent

Soybean Objective Yield Survey Data,

BANDIT TIMBER SALE Highlights Iron River Ranger District OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST The Bandit Timber Sale Area is along the south side of FR 3110, 2.1 mi

Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2011 Summary

Land Values and Cash Rents: 2008 Summary

Idaho Forest By the Numbers

Winter Wheat Seedings

Estimating Air Drying Times of Small-Diameter Ponderosa Pine and Douglas-Fir Logs

Honey. United States Honey Production Down 1 Percent

NRCS Water Quality Practices

AMERICAN WOOD-PRESERVERS ASSOCIATION

General Location: Approximately 6 miles east of Huntsville, Utah along the South Fork of the Ogden River (Figure 1)

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

Reforestation and Nurseries

FRONT RUNNER. An Evaluation of a Front-Mounted Rock Rake. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Technology & Development Program

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

Preservatives and Pressure Treatment Processes for Timber

Honey. United States Honey Production Down 16 Percent

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

Forest Resources of the Ashley National Forest

Transcription:

Buy Local, Buy Quality Benefits of using wood posts: Superior strength Ability to hold well in the soil Long-lasting durability Easy to install Maintenance free Natural beauty

Throughout the West, our National forests face an increased risk of catastrophic wildfire because of an over-abundance of dense, overstocked forest stands. To restore the open, park-like settings that existed in presettlement times, these stands need thinning. Such restoration is expensive, but if economic uses can be found for this thinned smalldiameter material, some costs could be offset. When building or rebuilding fence lines, wood posts offer a natural and traditional use for thinnings from the forest. Wood posts are exceptionally strong, providing a high strength-to-weight ratio. A force of 300 pounds applied 48 inches above the ground line will cause steel posts to fail, but it would take at least 400 pounds to cause a failure in a 2½-inch wood post.

Wood posts stay in the ground better because more surface area is in contact with the surrounding soil. In winter, snow and ice can freeze to fence wire. If the soil is even slightly sandy, steel posts become unstable, but properly installed wood posts stay solidly in the ground. For woods that have a natural durability, such as juniper, preservative treatment is not necessary. However, many woods are not naturally durable. The lifespan of a typical piece of lumber will increase 5 to 10 times if treated properly with a preservative (Table 1). Preservatives prevent decay and repel attacks by carpenter ants, borers, and other insects. Wood posts that have been properly treated with a preservative are extremely durable. To ensure durability, wood poles and posts need to be treated with a preservative to meet specified retention and depth of penetration levels (Table 2). When buying preservativetreated poles and posts, ask the supplier for material that meets the American Wood Preservers Association (AWPA) C5 00 standard. Table 1 Average life of treated and untreated fence posts Preservative Species Untreated (years) treated (years) Aspen 1.4 to 14 30 Ponderosa pine 3.5 to 14 35+ Lodgepole pine 4 to 12 35+ Douglas-fir 7 to 12 20+ Juniper 29 --

Table 2 Preservative retention and depth of penetration levels Preservative Retention (lb/ft³) Lodgepole pine Depth of penetration Copper naphthenate 0.055 Penta, CCA-C 0.4 ACA, ACZA 0.4 ACC 0.5 Creosote 6.0 Ponderosa pine Copper naphthenate 0.055 Penta, CCA-C 0.4 ACA, ACZA 0.4 ACC 0.5 Creosote 8.0 1¼ in. or 85% of sapwood 2 in. or 85% of sapwood Douglas-fir Copper naphthenate 0.055 Penta, CCA-C 0.4 ACQ-B, ACZA 0.4 ACA 0.5 Creosote 8.0 Western hemlock, Western larch Penta, CCA-C 0.4 ACA, ACZA 0.4 ACC 0.5 Creosote 8.0 3/8 in., 100% of sapwood or 1 in., 85% of sapwood 3/8 in., 100% of sapwood or 1 in., 85% of sapwood *It is easier to see the difference between sapwood and heartwood in Douglas-fir than it is in ponderosa and lodgepole pine. Outer bark Sapwood Heartwood Douglas-fir cross section..

Wood posts that are 2 to 9 inches in diameter and 6 to 8 feet in length can be easily installed. In loose soils, some regions use a tractormounted post driver. In thick, compact hardpan, heavy sod, or through tree roots, a tractor-mounted auger is used. Montana highway workers have reported that properly treated wood posts give years of maintenance-free service. In fact, they note We have never had a wood signpost actually wear out....

A natural benefit of using wood fence posts is how they enhance the beauty of the landscape. Wood blends with the countryside, giving unity and harmony to nature. 5(0(0%(5VPDOOGLDPHWHUVWRFN UHPRYHGDVWKLQQLQJVLVLGHDOIRU IHQFHSRVWVZKHQSURSHUO\WUHDWHG,WLVDQHIILFLHQWZD\WRKDQGOHWKLV UHQHZDEOHDQGQDWXUDOUHVRXUFHDQG LWFRQWULEXWHVWRWKHORFDOHFRQRP\

Check your Yellow Pages for local sources of preservative-treated wood fence posts. Additional information on products and suppliers can be obtained from the following: Intermountain Roundwood Association P.O. Box 805 Seeley Lake, MT 59868 (406) 677 2300 American Wood Preservers Association P.O. Box 5690 Granbury, TX 76049 0690 (817) 326 6300 www.awpa.com American Wood Preservers Institute 2750 Prosperity Ave., Suite 550 Fairfax, VA 22031 4312 (800) 356 AWPI or (703) 204 0500 www.preservedwood.com Western Wood Preservers Institute 7017 NE Highway 99, Suite 108 Vancouver, WA 98665 (800) 729 WOOD or (360) 693 9958 www.wwpinstitute.org FPL. 1999. Wood handbook Wood as an engineering material. FPL GTR 113. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Chapter 14. (www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/ch14.pdf) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc) should contact USDA s TARGET Center at (202) 720 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326 W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250 9410 or call (202) 720 5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. )RU LQIRUPDWLRQ RQ IHQFH W\SH GHVLJQ DQG LQVWDOODWLRQ FRQWDFW \RXU ORFDO &RXQW\ ([WHQVLRQ DJHQW

,IDVWURQJIHQFH OLQHWKDW VEXLOWWR ODVWPHHWV\RXU QHHGVPDNHORFDO SUHVHUYDWLYH WUHDWHGZRRGSRVWV \RXUPDWHULDORI FKRLFH References AWPA 2000. Standards. American Wood Preservers Association, Stevensville, MD. Borden, T.B.; Troxell, H.E. [n.a.] Use Colorado wood fence posts for a profit. Colorado State Forest Service and Colorado University, Fort Collins, CO. Cruickshank, D.E. 1970. Small roundwood products and split cedar fencing. State of Oregon Forestry Department. Gorman, T. M.; Wagner, F.G.; Wichman, D. P. 1997. Directory of Idaho wood products manufacturers, University of Idaho. Kuhns, M. R.; Kelson, A. R.; Lilieholm, R. J. 1997. Utah and Nevada wood industry directory, Utah State University Extension. Lebow, Stan. 2001. Personal communication. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. February. Morrell, J.J.; Miller, D.J.; Schneider, P.F. 1999. Service life of treated and untreated fence posts: 1996 post farm report. Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR. Schmidt, T. L.; Kuhns, M. R. 1990. Native wood fence posts. Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory S&PF Technology Marketing Unit, Madison, WI March 2001. 608/231 9504 www.fpl.fs.fed.us/tmu