APPENDIX C Cumulative Growth Calculations

Similar documents
SECTION 4.0 Basis of Cumulative Analysis

4.21 WASTEWATER DISPOSAL

SECTION 7.0 Other CEQA Considerations

Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations

Water Rates in Santa Barbara County: February 2019

Water Rates in Santa Barbara County: February 2018

Section 5.18 WASTEWATER

6.13 Utilities and Service Systems

MASTERS COLLEGE MASTER PLAN

CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES

B. ALL RESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVE

MASTERS COLLEGE MASTER PLAN

EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

7.0 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS

City of Loveland Water System

Section 3 - Land Use, Population, and Water Demands. Section 3

Sewer Siphon Pre-Design Report for the Santa Clara River Crossing at Vista Canyon (2009)

Leading Creek Conservancy District Water Treatment Plant

The PUD Supply-Side conservation program consists of the two (2) measures listed below.

Question 18 Wastewater Management

SECTION 5.15 Wastewater

Appendix J Sewer and Water Master Plan Study

PRELIMINARY WASTEWATER CAPACITY STUDY

Commercial and industrial water customers are combined under commercial usage figures. Figures indicate average number of customers for 2011.

6.20 UTILITIES SOLID WASTE

Monterey Salinas Transit Water Use Analysis for the Monterey Operations and Maintenance (TDA) Facility Renovation and Expansion Project

ADDENDUM TO THE EIR. Specifically, Section of the CEQA Guidelines states:

City of Greenfield Water Treatment Plant/System

A GUIDE TO THE DATA AND ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

ALBANY WATER BOARD SCHEDULE OF RATE STRUCTURE FEBRUARY 1, 2009

3.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

LAFCO ANNEXATION TO JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TTM RIVERBEND)

Notice of Public Hearing

AGENDA DOCKET FORM. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive update on the rate structure analysis and provide direction.

Electricity and Natural Gas

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. ENERGY CONSERVATION 1. ELECTRICITY

Figure Water Sources for Fiscal Year

WASTEWATER INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

TAUSSIG. & Associates, Inc. DAVID. Public Finance Facilities Planning Urban Economics CAPACITY FEE STUDY FOR SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY

CHAPTER 4 SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

K. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS SETTING SEWER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY WATER. IV. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation

David Balducci, Align Real Estate Doug Flaming, Doug Flaming Construction Management, Inc. Shari Libicki, Sarah Manzano, Kevin Warner

Plaza Mexico Residences 3000 E Imperial Highway Lynwood, CA KPFF Job #

Chapter 3 GHG Emissions Inventory

Wastewater ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Wastewater Collection

LOWE S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE

ODUCTION ANITARY SEWER

City of Hillsboro Water Treatment Plant/System

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. WATER SUPPLY

Metropolitan Water District. July 25, 2013

F I N A L Water and Wastewater Charges Study

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS WATER RESOURCES: WATER SUPPLY 1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. a. Physical Setting. (1) Water Supply

FINAL WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Marina Coast Water District: A California Special District STATE OF THE DISTRICT

RATES SCHEDULES & FEES for Water Power and Sewer Service. Effective with meter readings made on or after July 1, 2017 (FY )

Supplemental Water Supply Program and Fee Study. City of Coachella

SECTION 7.0 Other CEQA Considerations

GRAPEVINE SPECIFIC & COMMUNITY PLAN. KERN COUNTY PLANNING & NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT June 28, 2016

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A LONG FORM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SURCHARGE STATEMENT

Hydrologic Basis for SLVWD Drought Management Plan presented to SLVWD Board of Directors March 6, 2014

FACTS INFORMATION GENERAL LEGEND HIGHLIGHTS FINANCIAL FIBER OPTIC ELECTRIC & NATURAL GAS WASTEWATER FACTS WATER & NUMBERS PHONE.

APPENDIX J WATER SUPPLY AND SEWER CAPACITY STUDY

City Council Public Input Session Water / Sewer Rate Study. March 19, 2014

on potable water, recycled water and sanitation service rates

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS O. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 1. WASTEWATER

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SOLEDAD VILLAGE SCH NO Lead Agency:

Water, Wastewater and Irrigation Impact Fee Study

APPENDIX B. WSSC Design Criteria for Water Distribution Systems

Final Report and Recommendations on Wastewater Rates, Fees, and Charges

City of Palmdale Sewer Master Plan Final Report

Chapter 8. Acronyms/Abbreviations

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

West Bountiful City. Water System Capital Facilities Plan

MEMORANDUM. DATE: December 12, Steve Joseph, P.E. J. Philip Cooke, P.E. Monique Durand, P.E. Wastewater Flow Projections

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS O. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 1. WASTEWATER

A table is presented below with all wastewater generation sources: TABLE 18-1 WASTEWATER FLOWS. Sewage Loading (GPD/Unit)

Table 1- Residential CO2eq Baseline Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley

CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT. Treated and Untreated Water Rate Study

Water and Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Maximum Impact Fees Study. San Antonio Water System

DSRSD: AT Dublin Project Water Supply Assessment

Marina Coast Water District: A California Special District ORD COMMUNITY WATER AUGMENTATION

~ City Recorder -;;-}

Table 17.A1 and Table 17.A2 below show water demand and supply for the Project respectively. Table 17.A1 Potable and Non-Potable Water Demand [1]

4.4 UTILITIES WATER RESOURCES EXISTING CONDITIONS

Rates as of January Current rates may be different. Holly Springs. Utility offers unique rates for reuse irrigation meters, not modeled here.

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Santa Clarita Valley Family of Water Suppliers WATER USE EFFICIENCY STRATEGIC PLAN. June 24, 2015 WESTERN POLICY RESEARCH

CITY OF TEHACHAPI GENERAL PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Report

Table of Contents Part Title Page

APPENDIX K. Water Supply Report

Water Supply Assessment for French Valley 170 and Proposed Excess Water Demand Offset Requirement

INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY Prepared by

Trends in Water Efficiency

Contents 8/31/2017 DRAFT REGIONAL IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS

2010 Utility Plan Amendment Boxelder Sanitation District

Florida Government Utility Authority- Lehigh Utility System

COMMISSION ADOPTED POLICY Revenue Policy

Transcription:

APPENDIX C Cumulative Growth Calculations

POPULATION Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (s.f.) Parks (acres) 6) NW and SW Corner of Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy. 13) Valle do Oro Residential 111 17) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 5 18) S. of Soledad at Penlong Rd. 147 21) Proposed Project 99 TOTAL 7,683 2,783 2,790,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 300,000 5 Growth Factor 3.081 3.081 0.00182 0.00182 0.00208 0.00182 N/A Population 23,671 8,574 5,072 2,646 8,735 545 0 TOTAL POPULATION GROWTH 49,244 Note: The population growth factor assumes 3.081 persons per household on average. Housing units are multiplied by 3.081 to yield population growth, while employment-generating uses are multiplied by an employment factor to yield employment growth, then it is assumed (conservatively) that 25% of new employees would relocate to the area. Assuming 1/4 of new employees (and their families) move to the area and require housing, the resultant population growth would be new employees multiplied by 3.081 for each respective housing unit required to house each new employee. Employment factors are 2.36 employees per 1,000 square feet for commercial and school uses, and 2.70 employees per 1,000 square feet for industrial uses. (Per SCAG 2003)

EMPLOYMENT Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (s.f.) Parks (acres) 6) NW and SW Corner of Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy. 13) Valle do Oro Residential 111 5 17) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 18) S. of Soledad at Penlong Rd. 147 21) Proposed Project 99 TOTAL 7,683 2,783 2,790,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 300,000 5 Growth Factor N/A N/A 0.00236 0.00236 0.00270 0.00236 N/A Employment 0 0 6,585 3,435 11,340 708 0 TOTAL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH 22,068 Note: Employment growth factors are 2.36 employees per 1,000 square feet for commercial and school uses and 2.70 employees per 1,000 square feet for industrial uses (per SCAG 2003).

HOUSING Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (s.f.) Parks (acres) 6) NW and SW Corner of Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy. 13) Valle do Oro Residential 111 5 17) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 18) S. of Soledad at Penlong Rd. 147 TOTAL 7,683 2,783 2,790,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 300,000 10 Growth Factor N/A N/A 0.00059 0.00059 0.00068 0.00059 N/A Housing 7,683 2,783 1,646 859 2,835 177 0 TOTAL HOUSING GROWTH 15,983 Note: Housing growth factors are equal to the projected employment generated by uses multiplied by 0.25 (25%), which assumes that 1/4 of employees would relocate to the project vicinity and require housing. Commercial and school factor is 2.36 employees per 1,000 square feet, while the industrial factor is 2.70 employees per 1,000 square feet (per SCAG 2003).

NATURAL GAS Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) a Schools (s.f.) b Parks (acres) 6) NW and SW Corner of Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy. 13) Valle do Oro Residential 111 17) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 5 18) S. of Soledad at Penlong Rd. 147 TOTAL 7,683 2,783 2,790,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 300,000 10 Consumption Factor c 6,665.0 4,011.5 2.9 2.0 2.416 2.0 N/A Monthly Natural Gas Consumption (kcf) 51,207,195.0 11,164,004.5 8,091,751.1 2,911,000.0 10,147,200.0 600,000.0 0.0 Total Monthly Natural Gas Consumption (kcf) 84,121.2 Notes: a) The consumption factor for industrial uses is cubic feet per gas meter per month. This analysis assumes 100,000 square feet of industrial space per meter. b) No factor exists for school uses. As such, the office factor was applied. c) Consumption factors are in cubic feet per month and are from the South Coast Air Quality Management District's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993), Table A9-12-A. cf = cubic feet kcf = thousand cubic feet

ELECTRICITY Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) a Schools (s.f.) b Parks (acres) 6) NW/SW Corner Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy 13) Golden Valley Ranch Commercial 105,000 17) NE Corner McBean/Newhall Ranch 130,000 30,000 5 18) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 TOTAL 7,536 2,672 3,025,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 330,000 10 Consumption Factor c 5,626.5 5,626.5 13.55 12.95 10.50 11.55 N/A Annual Electricity Consumption (kwh) 42,401,304.00 15,034,008.00 40,992,259.45 18,848,725.00 44,100,000.00 3,811,500.00 0.00 Total Annual Cumulative Electricity Consumption (MWh) 165,187.80 Notes: a) Because no consumption factor exists for industrial uses, the Miscellaneous factor was applied. b) Schools include both elementary school and college/university uses. As such, the more conservative college/university factor was applied. c) Consumption factors are in kilowatt-hours per dwelling unit or square foot, as applicable, and are from the South Coast Air Quality Management District's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993), Table A9-11-A. kwh = kilowatt-hours MWh = megawatt-hours

FIRE PROTECTION Description SFR (d.u.) a MFR (d.u.) b Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (s.f.) Parks (acres) 6) NW/SW Corner Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy 13) Golden Valley Ranch Commercial 105,000 17) NE Corner McBean/Newhall Ranch 130,000 30,000 5 18) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 TOTAL 7,536 2,672 3,025,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 330,000 10 Impact Fee Factor c $775 $310 $0.3877 $0.3877 $0.3877 $0.3877 $0.3877 Fire Impact Fees $5,843,414 $828,748 $1,172,893 $564,297 $1,628,340 $127,941 $0 Total Fire Impact Fees $10,165,633 Notes: a) Single-family homes are assumed to be 2,000 square feet on average. b) Multi-family homes are assumed to be 800 square feet on average. c) Fees for fire service impacts are $0.38776 per square foot of new development for all land uses.

SOLID WASTE Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (acres) Parks (acres) 6) NW/SW Corner Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy 13) Golden Valley Ranch Commercial 105,000 17) NE Corner McBean/Newhall Ranch 130,000 30,000 5 18) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 TOTAL 7,536 2,672 3,025,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 330,000 10 Generation Factor (tpd) 0.005 0.0032 0.000023 0.00003 0.000031 0.0000036 N/A Solid Waste (tpd) 37.68 8.55 69.58 43.67 130.20 1.19 0.00 TOTAL DAILY SOLID WASTE GENERATION (tpd) 291 Notes:Generation factors are in tons per day per dwelling unit or square foot, as appropriate, and are derived from the California Integrated Waste Management Board website. (http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/wastechar/wastegenrates/default.htm) tpd = tons per day

WASTEWATER Description SFR (d.u.) a MFR (d.u.) b Retail (s.f.) c Office (s.f.) d Industrial (s.f.) e Schools (s.f.) f Parks (acres) e 6) NW/SW Corner Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy 13) Golden Valley Ranch Commercial 105,000 17) NE Corner McBean/Newhall Ranch 130,000 30,000 5 18) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 TOTAL 7,536 2,672 3,025,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 330,000 10 Acreage 3,425.45 242.91 185.20 26.73 142.84 7.58 10.00 Generation Factor (cfs/acre) 0.0015 0.012 0.015 0.015 0.021 0.015 0.0002 Peak Wastewater Generation (gpm) g 2,306.18 1,308.30 1,246.86 179.97 1,346.36 51.00 0.90 Notes: Total Daily Peak Wastewater Generation (gpd) h Total Daily Peak Wastewater Generation (mgd) a) Single-family homes were assumed to be zoned Residential Low Density at 2.2 dwelling units per acre. b) Multi-family homes were assumed to be zoned Residential Moderate at 11 dwelling units per acre. c) Retail uses were assumed to be zoned commercial with a Floor-Area Ratio of 0.375:1. d) Office uses were assumed to be zoned Commercial Office with a Floor-Area Ratio of 1.25:1 e) Industrial uses were assumed to be zoned Industrial with a Floor-Area Ratio of 0.675:1. f) School uses are assumed to be comparable to Office uses in terms of wastewater generation. Office factor was used. 9,272,967 9.27

g) Peak wastewater generation (gpm) is calculated by multiplying the acreage by the factor (for cfs), multiplied by 60 seconds per minute, then 7.480519 gallons per cubic foot. h) Daily generation is calculated by multiplying peak generation (gpm) by 60 minutes per hour, then 24 hours per day to yield gallons per day. cfs = cubic feet per second gpm = gallons per minute gpd = gallons per day mgd = million gallons per day d.u. = dwelling unit s.f. = square foot

WATER Description SFR (d.u.) MFR (d.u.) Retail (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Industrial (s.f.) Schools (s.f.) Parks (acres) 6) NW/SW Corner Dockweiler and Sierra Hwy 13) Golden Valley Ranch Commercial 105,000 17) NE Corner McBean/Newhall Ranch 130,000 30,000 5 18) NE Corner Newhall Ranch/GVR 319 180 TOTAL 7,536 2,672 3,025,259 1,455,500 4,200,000 330,000 10 Acreage N/A N/A 185 27 143 8 10 Consumption Factor (AFY) 0.9 0.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.5 Annual Water Consumption (AFY) 6,782 1,069 741 107 571 30 55 TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION (AFY) 9,356 Notes: a) Retail uses were assumed to be zoned commercial with a Floor-Area Ratio of 0.375:1. b) Office uses were assumed to be zoned Commercial Office with a Floor-Area Ratio of 1.25:1 c) Industrial uses were assumed to be zoned Industrial with a Floor-Area Ratio of 0.675:1. d) Because open space is assumed to consume no water, only park-related consumption is calculated. e) Consumption factors provided by Newhall County Water District, which are more conservative than those of Valencia Water Company. Factors were provided for Single-family residential, Multi-family residential, commercial retail, and parks. Commercial factor was used for retail, office, industrial, and school uses. f) Water consumption is calculated by multiplying the dwelling units or acreage, as appropriate, by the annual consumption factor. d.u. = dwelling units s.f. = square feet AFY = acre-feet per year