ROCK CRUSHING PLANT APPLICATIONS ADVICE

Similar documents
ADVICE FOR OBTAINING PERMIT EXEMPT APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS

STATEMENT OF BASIS. Cheney Lime & Cement Company Landmark Plant Alabaster, Alabama Shelby County Facility No

SWCAA Emission Inventory Instructions

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. PERMIT NO: 09LP0202F Final Approval

ATTACHMENT A CERTIFICATION OF TRUTH, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS

Iowa Department of Natural Resources Title V Operating Permit

Notice of Intent for Bonneville Borrow Area Plant

F.1 Construction Emissions

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

TECHNICAL FACT SHEET September 24, 2018

EMISSIONS ACTIVITY CATEGORY FORM AGGREGATE PROCESSING PLANTS

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION APPLICATION GUIDE FORMS & INSTRUCTIONS

YOLO-SOLANO AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 1947 Galileo Court, Suite 103; Davis, CA Phone (530) ; Fax (530)

Emissions Calculations Joshua Kalfas. Emissions Inventory Workshop February 3 rd, 2015 Tulsa, OK

Emission Control Technology Review for NorthMet Project Processing Plant RS58A

e-cfr Data is current as of May 1, 2008 Visit EPA s Website at for recent updates.

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. DATE ISSUED: January 7, 2015 ISSUED TO: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division. Temporary Permit

FINAL REPORT. Notice of Intent. Copperton Concentrator Projects. Prepared for. Kennecott Utah Copper LLC. Prepared by

ASA Bloomingburg, LLC. Air permit-to-install (PTI) number Public Hearing Date April 18, 2006 Comment Period End Date April 25, 2006

December 22, Dear Mr. Kuykendal:

ADEQ MINOR SOURCE AIR PERMIT

EMISSIONS ACTIVITY CATEGORY FORM CEMENT MANUFACTURING PLANTS

Comments on Draft Permit #12-POY-079. FTS International Proppants, LLC. Acadia, Trempealeau, Wisconsin. March 15, 2013

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. January 26, NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT TO INSTALL No.

Particulate Matter Regulations Presentation. Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services Agency Air Quality Division

2007 Area Source Emissions Inventory Methodology 430 SAND AND GRAVEL EXCAVATION AND PROCESSING GRINDING AND CRUSHING OF AGGREGATE

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM. October 26, 2018

EMISSIONS ACTIVITY CATEGORY FORM IRON PRODUCTION

SUBPART OOO Check-OFF FORM July 11, 2005

Elements of a completeness review

4.4 AIR QUALITY Approach to Analysis

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

PERMITTEE Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, FL 33618

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Compressor Station Whites Creek Pike Page 1

STATEMENT OF BASIS for NEWARK BAY COGENERATION PARTNERSHIP L.P.

Wellington Development WVDT, LLC Greene Energy Resource Recovery Project 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS

Statement of Basis. Daikin America, Inc. Morgan County Decatur, Alabama

STATEMENT OF BASIS. NAICS Description: Soybean and Other Oilseed Processing NAICS Code:

HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANTS

NARRATIVE. Manny Patel Ginger Payment DATE: June 15, 2015

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

STATEMENT OF BASIS. NAICS Description: All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing NAICS Code:

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. March 17, 2004 NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT TO INSTALL

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE

ADEQ MINOR SOURCE AIR PERMIT

2015 UTAH ASPHALT CONFERENCE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION 101. Kilgore Companies and Kimball Equipment

Clean Air Act Emission Limits

4.0 Emissions Inventory

NM-EQ Equipment Description and Notification Form Nonmetallic Mineral Processing General Permit

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

NSPS Applicability Worksheet Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Example

A. The New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Env-A 100 et seq., New Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution; and

Technical Support Document for Draft Air Emission Permit No

Minor Source BAT Programs

Appendix B SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. November 8, PERMIT TO INSTALL No A

State of Utah. Department of Environmental Quality DAQE-AN October 26, 2009

Crushed Stone Processing and Pulverized Mineral Processing

Air Emissions 101. What are Some Types of Emissions? Oil & Gas Emissions: In Context VOC

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

BACT Determination Information

PORTABLE CONCRETE/ASPHALT RECY BACT Size: Minor Source BACT Crusher, Screen, Transfer & Storage. BACT Determination Information

TITLE V COMMERCIAL PRINTING FACILITIES What is Title V?

Marquette General Health System December 11, 2001 Permit No B Page 1 of 8. Table of Contents

A.4.2 Minn. R. for Fiberglass Operations placed in operation on or after July 9, 1969

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY PSD, NSPS (40CFR60), NESHAP (40CFR63) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

Intent to Approve: Modify Approval Order DAQE-AN to Allow for Material Movement Increase and Add a Crusher Project Number: N

Chapter Overview. Chapter 3: Sources of Air Pollution 3-1. Role of Sources of Air Pollution in an Air Quality Management Program.

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

The DeMinimis changes will result in a net increase in permitted particulate (PM/PM 10 ) emissions of 1.6 tons/yr for the facility.

GOVERNMENT of PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD

State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division. Temporary Permit

ADEQ OPERATING AIR PERMIT

MONTANA AIR QUALITY PERMIT APPLICATION

Initial Notifications Concerning Emissions Inventories for the Natural Gas Industry

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Air Regulations Impacting the Pipeline Industry

2014 Toxics Reduction Act Substance Accounting Reporting Values for Canada Building Materials Kingston Ready Mix Concrete Plant for PM 10

PTE. Potential to Emit

Table of Contents. (a) APPLICABILITY... 1 (b) EXEMPTIONS... 1 (c) DEFINITIONS... 1 (d) STANDARDS... 2

ADEQ NON-CRITERIA POLLUTANT CONTROL STRATEGY Revised April 2015

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM March 27, 2002

Original Title V Air Permit Application Submittal: March 2014 Submission Date for corrections: March, 2015

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. April 14, 2017 PERMIT TO INSTALL ISSUED TO Weber Sand & Gravel, Inc.


APPENDIX E: RECORD OF NON-APPLICABILITY AND AIR QUALITY DATA

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. February 3, NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT TO INSTALL No.

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT February 7, 2012

Huber Engineered Woods, LLC, TV Page 1 of 7

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM. January 28, 2015

RULE Federally Enforceable Limits on Potential to Emit - Adopted 1/25/96, Amended 1/12/12 (Effective 3/8/12)

Chapter 12. Abrasive Blasting

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT AIR QUALITY DIVISION. March 31, PERMIT TO INSTALL No A

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division RENEWABLE OPERATING PERMIT STAFF REPORT. General Motors LLC - Orion Assembly Plant

Recent Air Pollution Control and Permit Experience in the Lime Industry. Steven Klafka, P.E., DEE Wingra Engineering, S.C. Madison, Wisconsin

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

502(b)(10) Permit for Part 70 Source

EC-16 Grain Elevator & Feed Mill Calculation Form

Transcription:

ROCK CRUSHING PLANT APPLICATIONS ADVICE This guidance is intended to help applicants prepare applications and certifications with a reduced amount of effort, yielding clearer and more accurate applications. We hope to steer new applicants around some common mistakes, allowing them to prepare applications which are complete on their first try. There are two possible options: a site-specific permit or an Authorization under a General Operating Permit. The main differences between using a site-specific permit and a General Operating Permit are in the amount of text in the permit and the amount of time normally spent in processing. GOP Authorizations are normally issued quickly but then result in operators going through a lengthy document, trying to determine which standards are applicable and how to comply with them; these would be stated explicitly in a site-specific permit. If time is not of the essence in getting a plant construction commenced, the site-specific permit is preferred; if time is of the essence, the faster GOP Authorization is better. In addition, a separate construction permit is required for future expansions if a site-specific permit is selected, while certain expansions are pre-approved under the GOP. The process involves preparation of facility descriptions, emissions estimates, and completion of some administrative forms. Two passes through the process may be required, calculating emissions and adjusting emissions if any level of significance is exceeded. The pollutant of concern is particulate matter. If the facility has stationary engines (such as generators), you will also need to address nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), particulate matter (PM), and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). These are referred to as regulated air pollutants. In addition, there may be emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), primarily formaldehyde from the engine(s). In general, a rock crushing plant will have a primary crusher, primary, secondary crusher(s) and secondary (s), and associated conveyors and stockpiles. It may also involve portable generators powered by diesel engines. Emissions of each pollutant must be less than 100 TPY for the facility to be a minor source. Information as listed here may be attached to the application. Example formats are provided in this document. Administrative Forms The first thing to do is acquire a copy of the forms. A. Log onto the DEQ web page: www.deq.state.ok.us B. Go to the Air Quality page Rock Crushing Plant 1 Revised 11/01/11

C. Select Forms D. Select either Rock Crushers & Sand & Gravel Application or Non-metallic Mineral Processing Minor Facility Air Quality General Permit Application. If you download the MS Word copies of these documents, they may be filled in on computer and stored for later needs. On the General Facility Information Form 100-884, please do not mark both construction and operating permits as this makes your application self-contradictory. Construction permits and operating permits are applied for separately. Minor source applications are all listed as Tier I. The SIC Code means Standard Industrial Classification Code, 1422 for limestone, 1423 for granite, 1429 for other crushed stone, 1442 for sand and gravel, and 1221 for coal. The Landowner Notification Affidavit must be completed and signed for all applications, but it is commonly overlooked, resulting in delays in processing applications and issuing permits. Fees Fee levels are detailed in the respective application guide. Basic Information Please be certain that your application technical information contains the following items: A. List plant equipment: each crusher,, conveyor, stacker, engine, organic liquids storage tank. Include make, model, serial number, and date of manufacture (the date the plant was first constructed or moved into the US). B. If any baghouse, wet scrubber, cyclone, etc., is used, stack height, diameter or dimensions, flow rate, and temperature. C. Emissions control device efficiency, including pressure differential range. D. For stationary engines: fuel type(s) and sulfur content, HP rating, manufacture date, and engine type (spark ignition or diesel, gas-fuel or other fuel). E. Maximum anticipated production (tons per hour and tons per year). F. Capacity (gallons), maximum annual throughput, and date of manufacture of all hydrocarbon (fuel) storage tanks associated with the plant. Rock Crushing Plant 2 Revised 11/01/11

Preparing Emissions Estimates Emissions factors for most are obtained from EPA s TTN web site: A. Log onto EPA s Technology Transfer Network, www.epa.gov/ttn B. Select CHIEF (Clearinghouse for Inventories and Emissions Factors) C. Select Emission Factors D. Select AP-42 E. Select Chapter 11 and download Section 11.19.2 for Crushed Stone Processing. F. For engines, select Chapter 3 and download Section 3.3 for diesel engines smaller than 600 HP and Section 3.4 for diesel engines larger than 600 HP. G. For batch drop operations (unloading by front-end loaders), download Section 13.2.4. A 70% control efficiency may be applied for damp material. H. For storage piles, download Section 8.19.1. A 70% control efficiency may be applied for damp material. I. For tanks, at CHIEF, select Emission Factor and Estimation Tools, then go down to TANKS to download the program which calculates emissions from hydrocarbon storage tanks. If any unit venting into a baghouse was constructed after August 31, 1983, PM emissions estimates from equipment using a baghouse are best prepared based on stack flows and the federal limit (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO) of 0.022 grains per dry standard cubic foot. Here, grains refers to the unit of weight; 7,000 grains equals one pound. At the temperatures and moisture contents normally seen, ACFM is nearly equal to SCFM. For a hypothetical plant with a baghouse and stack flow of 4,000 SCFM, the emission rate would be 4,000 SCFM * 0.022 gr/dscf * 60 min/hr / 7,000 gr/lb = 0.75 lb/hr. If this plant operates up to 1,200 hours per year, annual emissions are 0.75 lb/hr * 1,200 hours/year / 2,000 lb/ton = 0.45 TPY from the stack in question. Please be sure to include the stack height and dimensions. Rock Crushing Plant 3 Revised 11/01/11

PROCESS RATES Provided that 100 TPY of any regulated air pollutant (particulate matter is a regulated air pollutant) is not exceeded, it is recommended that conservatively-high estimates of operating hours and process rates be made. The capacity of the primary crusher is generally known, and therefore the process weight of the primary crusher, primary conveyor, and primary. After this point, it is frequently not easy to tell what process rates will be. The material processed at the primary crusher and will be oversized and undersized. Oversized material is returned to the primary crusher, but the total of new material and returned material cannot exceed the capacity of the primary crusher. A common source of confusion is in estimating material flows following the primary. You may pick reasonable percentages, such as 20% of material from the primary being returned to the primary crusher and 80% proceeding to the second crusher, or you may use worst-case flows. Worst-case flows will result in showing the discharges from a unit to be higher than the input. Although that is impossible, it is used only for estimating maximum emissions from each unit. AP-42 is periodically updated, so limits based on these factors may become out-of-date. It may be to your advantage to include a safety factor on calculations provided that the resultant emissions do not exceed any level of significance such as a regulatory limit or a major source threshold. EMISSION FACTORS A. Process Operations Unit CRUSHED ROCK Uncontrolled Emission Factor, lb/ton COAL Uncontrolled Emission Factor, lb/ton Crusher feed 0.007 0.007 Primary crushers 0.00070 0.2 Primary s 0.015 0.2 Secondary crushers 0.0024 0.2 Tertiary crushers 0.0024 NA Fines crushing 0.015 NA Fines ing 0.071 NA Conveyor transfer points 0.0014 0.2 Batch drop (truck dumping, 0.0031 0.12 stackers, etc.) * Stockpiles 0.263 lb/acre/hr (active) 0.071 lb/acre/day (inactive) 7.2 lb/acre/hr * The batch drop factor is derived from the equation in AP-42, Section 13.2.4: E (lb/ton) = k * 0.0016 * (U/2.2) 1.3 / (M/2) 1.4 Rock Crushing Plant 4 Revised 11/01/11

where k = 0.35 (PM 10 factor), U = wind speed (15 mph assumed), and M = moisture content (1.5% assumed). Coal handling factors were taken from "Compilation of Past Practices and Interpretations by EPA Region VIII on Air Quality Review of Surface Mining Operations." B. Engines Pollutant Diesel Engines Smaller than 600 HP, lb/hp-hr Diesel Engines Larger than 600 HP, lb/hp-hr PM 0.0022 0.0007 CO 0.00668 0.0055 NOx 0.031 0.024 SO 2 0.00205 0.00205 VOC 0.00251 0.0006 Formaldehyde 0.00046 0.00008 C. Storage Tanks Tank No. Contents Capacity (gallons) Dimensions, Height / Diameter Annual Throughput, Gallons Manufacture Date Rock Crushing Plant 5 Revised 11/01/11 VOC Emissions, TPY 1 Diesel 0,000 12 / 15 100,000 12/98 0.06 2 No. 2 diesel 2,000 6 / 10 9,000 1/79 0.01 The formats here are not rigid. Different formats may be used, but whatever is used should be clear enough that permit engineers can readily discern emission rates. EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS For this example, we will use a plant with a capacity of 300 TPH operated up to 1,500 hours per year. For the example, the facility will include a 650 HP diesel generator; fuel will be assumed to have 0.5% by weight sulfur. A. 650 HP Engine Pollutant Emission Factor, lb/hp-hr lb/hr Emissions TPY PM 0.0007 0.46 0.34 CO 0.0055 3.58 2.68 NOx 0.024 15.60 11.70 SO 2 0.00205 1.33 1.00 VOC 0.0006 0.39 0.29 Formaldehyde 0.00008 0.05 0.04

For example, the calculation for PM would be: - 650 hp * 0.0007 lb/hp-hr = 0.455 lb/hr - 0.455 lb/hr * 1500 hours per year / 2000 lb per ton = 0.34 TPY B. Rock Processing Operations Point ID Description Process Rate TPH Factor lb/ton Control Efficiency PM Emissions lb/hr TPY 1 Feed to primary crusher 300 0.007 70% 0.630 0.473 2 Primary crusher 300 0.0007 70% 0.063 0.047 3 Conveyer: crusher to primary 300 0.0014 70% 0.126 0.095 4 Primary 300 0.015 70% 1.350 1.013 5 Conveyors from primary 300 0.0014 70% 0.126 0.095 6 Conveyor to secondary crusher 300 0.0014 70% 0.126 0.095 7 Secondary crusher 300 0.0024 70% 0.173 0.130 8 Conveyor from secondary 240 0.0014 70% 0.101 0.076 crusher 9 Secondary 240 0.015 70% 1.080 0.810 10 Conveyors from secondary 240 0.0014 70% 0.101 0.076 11 Stacking rock from secondary 240 0.0031 70% 0.223 0.167 12 Stockpiles active 1,500 hours -- 0.263 0.263 0.197 13 Stockpiles inactive 7,260 hours -- 0.071 0.258 TOTALS 4.362 3.532 TOTAL EMISSIONS Operation PM CO NOx SO 2 VOC lb/hr TPY lb/hr TPY lb/hr TPY lb/hr TPY lb/hr TPY Processing 4.36 3.53 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Engine 0.46 0.34 3.58 2.68 15.60 11.70 1.33 1.00 0.39 0.29 Fuel Tanks -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.07 TOTALS 4.82 3.87 3.58 2.68 15.60 11.70 1.33 1.00 0.39 0.36 Road dust is not calculated here since it is not counted toward determining whether a facility is major or minor. Rock Crushing Plant 6 Revised 11/01/11