The Rockefeller Foundation and the Conservation of Genetic Diversity in Agricultural Crops

Similar documents
Improving Potato Production in Mexico: John S. Niederhauser and Rockefeller Foundation-Sponsored Research during the 1950s and 1960s.

GE 2211 Environmental Science and Engineering Unit V Population Growth. M. Subramanian

50 years of maize and wheat science for improved livelihoods. Dr. Martin Kropff Director General, CIMMYT

The first ever global agreement on agricultural biodiversity: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

Tropical Horticulture: Lecture 15

Eradicating hunger & malnutrition

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

Bioversity International Research for our future

Participatory Plant Breeding:

Benefit Sharing from Intellectual Property Rights of Plant Resources Cases in China

IT/GB-4/11/Inf. 5 E. Item 11 of the Provisional Agenda FOURTH SESSION OF THE GOVERNING BODY. Bali, Indonesia, March 2011

Recalling its Resolution 6/81 on plant genetic resources,

OR, go to then scroll down to Highlights and click on Plant Pathology Materials for Teachers

The Beginning of Agriculture

Devendra Gauchan, PhD. Bioversity International.

Introduction and overview

Promethean Science. Agricultural Biotechnology, the Environment, and the Poor. Ismail Serageldin and G. J. Persley

State of the World s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

FOR RESILIENCE (SIFOR)

Rethinking Realizing Value from Genetic Resources

System-wide information Network for Genetic Resources

Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Issues Summary. Prepared by Chantal Line Carpentier and Hans Herrmann

The 21. Century The Century of Plant Breeding Meeting the future by plant breeding. Peter Stamp

Technological trajectories and innovation systems in biotechnology

Medieval China and the Power of Learning

In Search of an African Green Revolution Center for Global Development Washington, DC September 6, 2006

CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

APHUG Chapter 10: Agriculture p.306

STATEMENT BY MR AHMED DJOGHLAF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Biodiversity Conservation for Sustainable Agroecosystems Workshop

Developing assessment and rating tools for Plant Breeding Capacity and Functionality

Chapter 1 Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement an Introduction

Which steps is FAO taking to strengthen the links and complementarity between in situ and ex situ conservation

THE EROSION OF CROP GENETIC DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES, STRATEGIES AND UNCERTAINTIES

Monitoring Crop Genetic Diversity

1.2 The evolution of community biodiversity management as a methodology for implementing in situ conservation of agrobiodiversity in Nepal

An International Research Initiative for Wheat Improvement

Enhancing Access to the Global Public Goods held by CGIAR Centers Genebanks

What is CIMSANS? David I Gustafson, Ph.D. Director, CIMSANS

SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE STATE OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ANGOLA

Objectives of the PPV&FR Act

SEVENTH SESSION OF THE GOVERNING BODY. Kigali, Rwanda, 30 October - 3 November 2017

SIAC Program Highlights: Objectives 1 and 2

20 Malaysia. Exploring the utility of a community seed bank in Sarawak. Paul Bordoni and Toby Hodgkin. Background

International Crop Diversity Collections. Towards greater efficiency and sustainability

9 ACCELERATION TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE MODERN REVOLUTION BEEN A POSITIVE OR A NEGATIVE FORCE?

ESCOLA TÈCNICA SUPERIOR D ENGINYERS AGRÒNOMS

Many traditional farmers provide environmental

17 Commentary on the Zambian Plant Breeder s Rights Act

Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2002 Feature: Bt Maize

Management response to the IEA Evaluation of the Genebanks CRP

Purpose. Introduction

Tight to the ground: Can sub-saharan Africa be self-sufficient in food production?

At present, the global population is half rural and half urban, but the world s. Urbanization and Agriculture to the Year 2020

On-Farm Water Management. More Crop Production

Working Group on Canadian Science and Technology Policy

From research to impact. Martin Kropff The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)

41 Nepal. Government policies and laws related to community seed banks. Pashupati Chaudhary, Rachana Devkota, Deepak Upadhyay and Kamal Khadka

Agrobiodiversity, title

Resource Management in Challenged Environments

IR-18: Development of Agricultural Industry Inferences and Questions Reading to Learn

3 Functions and activities

IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 9, FARMERS RIGHTS

Submission to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee one-off evidence session on the future of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

About GYBN...3. Guiding principles...4. Establishment of GYBN...6. Youth Participation in the CBD...7. GYBN Structure...9. Membership...

Policy of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) on Intellectual Property

Agricultural Revolution

WHO WILL OWN THE GENES IN OUR FOOD? Keeping free access to the world s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

EIP-AGRI Focus Group on Genetic Resources EHSAN DULLOO 29 JANUARY 2014

Canadian Meat Goat Association. Strategic Plan

The Role of Biodiversity, Traditional Knowledge and Participatory Plant Breeding in Climate Change Adaptation in Karst Mountain Areas in SW China

Director and Team Lead of the Cooperative Development Research and Resource Center of OCDC (International Cooperative Partnerships)

Once a species is extinct, it takes millions of years for new species to evolve in their place.

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

Financing mechanisms for agrobiodiversity conservation

Current Situation of New Plant Variety Protection System in Myanmar. Khin Mar Mar Nwe Deputy Director Department of Agricultural Research Myanmar

Outline THE GREEN REVOLUTION 12/10/2015

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

APAARI s Role in Strengthening Agricultural Research for Development in the Asia Pacific Region

National Level Training on Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods

Harnessing PGRFA for Enhanced Crop Productivity Challenges and Opportunities

The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition Institute

The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants

Progress of China Agricultural Information Technology Research and Applications Based on Registered Agricultural Software Packages

Crop Genetic Resources

Reaching food and nutrition security while adapting to climate change: a research agenda

Country Report on the implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) CANADA

Seed Market.

(1) MaizeGDB needs greater resources.

Use of Transgenic Crops to Increase Production on Saline Soil

Juan has a small vegetable garden on his land where he produces just enough food for his family.

UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF PEASANTS AND OTHER PEOPLE WORKING IN RURAL AREAS (UNDROP)

Introduction Food Crop Improvement What are the new technologies, Types of products Frank. Why do we need them

Agricultural biodiversity, knowledge systems and policy decisions

Center. January 20122

COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES

CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES

History of the International Treaty

Global review of commercialized transgenic crops

Current issues from ISF s perspective

Transcription:

R O C K E F E L L E R A R C H I V E C E N T E R R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S The Rockefeller Foundation and the Conservation of Genetic Diversity in Agricultural Crops by Helen Anne Curry University of Cambridge, UK 2016 by Helen Anne Curry Note: This research report is presented here with the author s permission, but should not be cited or quoted without the author s consent. Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports Online is an ongoing publication of the Rockefeller Archive Center (RAC) under the general direction of James Allen Smith, Vice President of the RAC and Director of Research and Education. Research Reports Online is intended to foster the network of scholarship in the history of philanthropy and to highlight the diverse range of materials and subjects covered in the collections at the RAC. These reports are drawn from essays submitted by researchers who have visited the Archive Center, most of whom have received grants-in-aid from the Archive Center to support their research. The ideas and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and not of the Rockefeller Archive Center.

In 1943, the Rockefeller Foundation launched a program that aimed to increase agricultural production in Mexico through greater research and training in agricultural sciences. This program (the Mexican Agricultural Program) is often described as the starting point of what we today call the Green Revolution, the transition in agricultural production seen in parts of the Global South in the 1950s and 60s. It is less often noted that the Mexican program was also the starting point of more than five decades of Rockefeller Foundation involvement in the collection and conservation of genetic diversity in agricultural crops. The research I conducted at the Rockefeller Archive Center consisted of surveying the various ways in which the Rockefeller Foundation contributed to the exploration, collection, and conservation of agro-biodiversity from 1943 onwards. Key moments in this history that I investigated through the available archival materials included: the collection of maize varieties as part of the Mexican Agricultural Program beginning in the 1940s, and continuing through the Inter- American Food Crop Program and still later the International Center for the Improvement of Maize and Wheat (CIMMYT); the establishment of a world collection of sorghum varieties at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, in the late 1950s; the creation of an equivalent world collection of rice varieties at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) beginning in 1960; the launch of a "World Germplasm Project" by the Rockefeller Foundation's Agricultural Sciences Program in 1969 in response to growing international concern over the global diminishment of crop genetic resources; the involvement of the Rockefeller Foundation (along with the Ford Foundation) in the creation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and its subsequent launch of an International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) in 1973; and, finally, the role of the Rockefeller Foundation in funding and planning the construction of a genebank facility in China in the early 1980s in cooperation with the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 2 R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S

The Rockefeller Foundation's first forays into the exploration and collection of crop plant diversity in the 1940s aimed to gather materials that would advance their goal of breeding higher-yielding crop plants for Mexican farmers as part of their newly formed Mexican Agricultural Program. Those leading the cornbreeding program, for example, began almost immediately to gather Mexican corn varieties that might serve as the basis for improved breeds suited to diverse Mexican environments. The first collections were made mostly at random while driving across the Mexican countryside. As the corn-breeding program became more firmly established, however, these collection activities became more comprehensive and regularized. By 1947, those working in the program estimated that they had some 1500 samples in their maize collection. 1 Although the Rockefeller Foundation corn breeders relied on these diverse materials, they also realized that if they succeeded in creating high-yielding types, their new varieties would replace the genetically diverse traditional varieties then in cultivation. Without farmers to grow them each year, selecting and maintaining seeds from season to season, these landraces could well die out. And they would be lost not only to future Mexican farmers but also to breeders like themselves. They soon began to articulate a need to conserve collections of diverse varieties, not just assemble them for immediate use. 2 They were supported in this idea and in the creation of still greater collections of maize diversity by a National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council "Committee on the Preservation of Indigenous Strains of Maize." Working together with the Rockefeller Foundation and drawing especially on funding provided by the US foreign aid agency, this Maize Committee claimed by 1955 to have amassed some 11,000 samples of maize from across the Americas. These accessions were stored at four sites, including new storage centers at the Rockefeller Foundation's established research stations (the one associated with the Mexican Agricultural Program at Chapingo, Mexico and a newer facility in Medellín, Colombia). 3 R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S 3

The actions of Rockefeller Foundation administrators and staff of its various agricultural programs during the 1950s and early 1960s suggest their deepening sense of the importance of collections of crop plant diversity, and especially of the central role of the foundation in maintaining these collections. This was due in large part to the perceived importance of the collections of maize (as well as those made of wheat) to the successes of its breeding programs in Mexico. As the Rockefeller Foundation looked to extend its agricultural research and breeding programs from Mexico and Colombia to all of Latin America and then to India, Pakistan, and the rest of Southeast Asia, it generated a need for access by a greater number of breeders and other scientists to collections of various key economic crop plants. For example, in 1956, the Rockefeller Foundation entered into an agreement with the Government of India to create a cooperative program at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute at New Delhi. As the program got off the ground in 1957 and 1958, a corn breeding initiative was the first to be established, followed shortly by an effort to improve sorghum and millets. The Rockefeller Foundation employee tasked with sorghum improvement (who had been transferred from the Mexican Agricultural Program) immediately proposed creating a "world collection" of sorghum varieties to support this effort. His inspiration came directly from his experience with the corn collection in Mexico. In short order, an India-wide collecting program was begun, in which Indian agronomists sought out locally adapted sorghum varieties, as well as corn and millets. These were later combined with materials sent from abroad to create the envisioned "world collection." 4 A similar story can be told of a different Rockefeller-linked institution, the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Jointly funded by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, IRRI s mission was to raise rice production across Asia especially through the production of higheryielding types. As with the maize and sorghum efforts described above, rice breeding began with an effort to assemble at IRRI as many rice varieties as possible. Because there were already a number of significant rice collections available elsewhere in Asia as well as in the United States and Europe, the 4 R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S

collection initially grew by means of donations rather than collecting. It nonetheless constituted a significant effort. By the end of 1972, the collection included nearly 7000 accessions. 5 While these programs were accumulating significant numbers of varieties of select crop plants, a growing number of breeders and geneticists in many different countries had begun to articulate concerns about the loss of crop genetic diversity. The 1960s saw increasing agitation for the creation of an international institution that would gather and protect in perpetuity the genetic diversity in agricultural plants, which was thought to be in rapid decline as a result of agricultural modernization that is, because of the still-unfolding Green Revolution especially in those parts of the world where the genetic diversity of crop plants was richest. International organizations including a joint initiative of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the International Biological Programme (IBP) formulated ambitious plans for a response to the escalating loss of plant genetic diversity including global collecting activities across a wide range of crops and their wild relatives, new regional and international seed banks, a coordinating agency, and more only to see these founder for lack of financial and institutional support. 6 Mounting international concerns about the "genetic erosion" occurring in species of agricultural importance worldwide soon spurred the Rockefeller Foundation to take action as well. Officers of the Rockefeller Foundation's Agricultural Sciences program felt that the foundation had an important role to play in collecting and maintaining crop genetic diversity, not least because of its past involvement in launching and maintaining large varietal collections at its agricultural research centers. In 1969 it put forward an initial proposal for a World Germplasm Project that would address this issue. This would consist in assembling four expert groups one each for maize, rice, wheat, and sorghum and the millets each of which would establish the status of existing crop collections, the gaps in R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S 5

these collections that most needed to be filled, and the future actions required to ensure the long-term survival of global crop diversity, or "germplasm resources." 7 Meanwhile, the joint FAO/IBP group continued to press for their vision of securing what were increasingly referred to as "plant genetic resources" through the creation of a world network of genetic resources centers and an international genebank for crop plants and their wild relatives. In 1971 representatives of this group laid their plans, and a plea for funding, at the feet of a newly organized international body called the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). There they described the loss of crop diversity as a concern that threatened the entire future of agricultural development, and therefore a crucial issue for CGIAR. From 1971 until 1973, members of CGIAR, whose mandate was to coordinate international aid for agricultural research in developing countries, worked to address the conservation of global crop diversity in a way that satisfied its core members. 8 Because the Rockefeller Foundation (along with the Ford Foundation) had been instrumental in creating CGIAR, and was extremely influential in CGIAR's decision making in its early years, it became involved in the conservation of agrobiodiversity through this route as well. In fact, administrators of the Rockefeller Foundation who served as representatives to CGIAR and sat on its Technical Advisory Committee directly influenced the eventual response of CGIAR to the issue of plant genetic resources. In 1973, CGIAR voted to establish a new agricultural research organization called the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR), the final form of which differed dramatically from the organization that the FAO/IBP group had had in mind and, by comparison, strongly reflected the concerns and priorities of the Rockefeller Foundation as these were articulated by its representatives. 9 The interest of the Rockefeller Foundation's agricultural science administrators in the conservation of crop plant diversity in the 1970s, and their embrace of this 6 R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S

as an issue suited to the aims of the foundation, is also evident in its sponsorship of a new seed storage facility in China beginning in the late 1970s. In 1974, one of the Rockefeller Foundation's agricultural officers traveled to China as part of a delegation of American scientists, and recommended to the agricultural scientists he met that they invest greater resources in the conservation of China's crop diversity. A few years later, when a Rockefeller Foundation delegation was invited to China to explore the possibilities for a foundation-funded project, a gene bank to be associated with the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences was quickly settled on as the preferred project. The planning and construction of this gene bank extended from 1980 to 1986; investigation of its execution unsurprisingly offers insights into US-China relations during this period as well as the Rockefeller Foundation's interest in germplasm collections. 10 Together these activities constituted the core of the Rockefeller Foundation's involvement in the exploration, collection, and conservation of agro-biodiversity from the 1940s through the 1990s. As this overview suggests, these activities were varied in nature and purpose. Taken as a whole, however, they are indicative of the central role of crop plant diversity in agricultural modernization in the twentieth century as well as the increased urgency attached to the conservation of such diversity over this period. R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S 7

1 For more on these efforts, see the oral histories of Paul Mangelsdorf and Edwin Wellhausen (both in RAC, RF RG 13). Additional scattered materials that describe these initial corn-collecting activities are found in RAC, RF RG 6.13, Series 1.1, in miscellaneous folders relating to the corn-breeding program (see, e.g., folders 21-28, 137, 141, 507). 2 See, e.g., foreword to E. J. Wellhausen, L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez X. in collaboration with Paul C. Mangelsdorf, Races of Maize in Mexico: Their Origin, Characteristics and Distribution (Bussey Institution of Harvard University, 1952). 3 Correspondence with and about the "Maize Committee" held in the RAC collections can be found in RAC, RF RG 1.2, Series 300, Box 1, Folders 2 6. 4 Detailed documentation of the sorghum collecting missions and the creation of the "world collection" are gathered in RAC, RF RG 6.7, Series IV.5, Box 74, Folders 485 487. 5 Documentation of the origins of the IRRI rice collection within the holdings of the RAC is limited, at least insofar as I could discover. Some relevant materials are available in RAC, RF 1.3, Series 103D, Box 18, Folders 116 120. 6 A useful overview of these proposals can be found in O. H. Frankel and E. Bennett, eds., Genetic Resources in Plants Their Exploration and Conservation, IBP Handbook No. 11 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1970). 7 Files related to the World Germplasm Project are concentrated in RAC, RF RG 1.3, Series 103D, Boxes 16 17, Folders 101 115. 8 A useful overview of the FAO/IBP and CGIAR efforts on plant genetic resources is Robin Pistorius, Scientists, Plants, and Politics: A History of the Plant Genetic Resources Movement (Rome: IPGRI, 1997). http://www.bioversityinternational.org/uploads/tx_news/scientists plants_and_politi cs_240_01.pdf. 9 Materials related to the formation of the IBPGR at the RAC are scattered but sometimes very revealing. One series of documents can be found in RAC, RF RG 1.3, Series 103D, Box 20, Folders 127 130; other related materials are in RAC, RF RG, Series 103D, Box 16 17, Folders 101 109. 10 This project is richly documented in the RAC and well worth the attention of another historian. The files are in RAC, RF RG 1.23, Series 601D, Boxes R2967 R2969. 8 R A C R E S E A R C H R E P O R T S