ESRI Forum Current State and Prospects of GHG reduction targets The EU s energy and climate strategy Christian Egenhofer Senior Research Fellow Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels Roppongi Hills Mori Tower Roppongi Academyhills, Tokyo 16 March 2007 1
On 8/9 March 2007 EU Heads of Governments and States adopted a new integrated climate and energy policy 2
Legally binding targets by 2020-20% greenhouse gas emissions (unilateral); if other countries join: - 30% + 20% renewables in overall energy mix + 20% better energy efficiency + 10% biofuels in overall energy mix All new fossil fuel power plants to be ready for carbon capture and storage (CCS) 3
Objectives: Increase security of supply Ensuring the competitiveness of European industry and the availability of affordable energy; Promoting environmental sustainability and combatting climate change EU is committed to transforming Europe into a highly energy-efficient and low greenhouse-gasemitting economy 4
The Emissions Challenge 5
Delaying mitigation is dangerous and costly 100 450ppm CO2e Global Emissions (GtCO2e 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50GtCO2e 65GtCO2e 70GtCO2e 500ppm CO2e (falling to 450ppm CO2e in 2150) 550ppm CO2e Business as Usual 0 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Source: Stern Review 2006 Stabilising below 450ppm CO2e without overshooting, would require emissions to peak by 2010 with 6-10% p.a. decline thereafter. If emissions peak in 2020, we can stabilise below 550ppm CO2e if we achieve annual declines of 1 2.5% afterwards A 10 year delay almost doubles the annual rate of decline required 6 6
The Energy Supply Challenge: EU Import Dependency 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% total oil natural gas solids 2000 2010 2020 2030 7
Oil Russia (31%) Middle East: 22% Gas Russia: 33% Algeria: 21% Coal South Africa: 26% Russia: 16% Main suppliers 8
How to change current energy mix nuclear 15% renewables 6% oil 37% solids 18% natural gas 24% 9
Energy mix 2020? baseline scenario consumption 1890 Mtoe RES 10,4% nuclear 12,1% solids 13,8% gas 28,1% oil 35,5% policy scenario consumption 1633 Mtoe nuclear 9,9% RES 19,9% solids 9,6% gas 25,3% oil 35,2% - less emissions - less consumption - less dependency 10
How? Low carbon energy (supply) Efficiency Technology 11
Green activisms or economic realism? Business cautiously welcomes initiative. 12
Why? Strong political commitment EU Leadership on climate change Making the EU popular with citizens Acting now is cheaper than acting later Ambitious but doable But real economic and political benefits 13
The energy dimension: OPEC and conventional oil may peak: Most recoverable resources should become economical at oil prices significantly below current level CTL GTL Biofuels Source: IEA 2005, Resources to Reserves Oil & Gas Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future 14
Really good news is that new conventional and non-conventional are outside OPEC 15
Potential of Non-Renewable Energy Sources Energy Resource Total worldwide petrol and natural gas production since start of fossil fuel production Conventional oil Conventional gas Heavy oil, bitumen Deep sea, arctic, enhanced oil recovery etc. Non conventional gas Coal Uranium Sources: Resources to Reserves, IEA 2005 and BGR Kurzstudie 2005 Potential Æ up to 10 trillion (10 9 ) bbl oil equivalent) ~ 1 500 1 792 2 148 2 323 > 2 500 > 8 000 23 820 520 to 1 750 16
Potential of Non-Renewable Energy Sources Energy Resource Total worldwide petrol and natural gas production since start of fossil fuel production Conventional oil Conventional gas Heavy oil, bitumen Non conventional gas Coal Uranium International Energy Agency: Deep sea, arctic, enhanced oil recovery etc. Potential up to 10 trillion (10 9 ) bbl oil equivalent) ~ 1 500 1 792 2 148 2 323 5-10 trillion barrels of oil equivalent exist Sources: Resources to Reserves, IEA 2005 and BGR Kurzstudie 2005 > 2 500 = 3 to 8 times total production since beginningof fossilfuel age > 8 000 23 820 520 to 1 750 16
Whether these resources will come to the market will depend on market forces, i.e. supply/demand and technology (Global) climate change action plays major role: global carbon price 1. makes new reserves economic 2. promotes the development of alternative sources (e.g. clean coal/carbon capture and storage, renewables 3. deployment of existing technologies such as nuclear 18
Global Crude Oil Production and the Oil Price Shock have reduced demand with a time lag 50 Crude Oil Production (10 9 barrel / year) 40? 30 20 10 0 1900 1950 2000 2050 Year Jahr 19
Costs and benefits Savings from energy efficiency Euro 50 billion p.a. by 2012 Euro 100 billion p.a. by 2020; possibly higher depending on oil price Possibly overall net benefit but not all benefits can be given a monetary value confirmed by a CEPS study Energy efficiency could achieve almost all of the 20% target for greenhouse gas emissions. Source: European Commission 20
Costs and benefits Renewables With CO 2 price of Euro 20 per tonne, no extra costs 20% share will cost Euro 18 billion p.a. at oil price of $ 48 per barrel; At $ 78 per barrel; costs are Euro 10,6 billion p.a. Benefits for job creation and technology leadership. 21
Summary EU faces an energy (import dependency) and climate change challenge Integrated energy and climate change package tries to address these Strong climate change policies if applied globally promotes the development of a wider variety of supply options (new conventional fossil resources, non-conventional resources, renewables, nuclear etc. 22
Summary (2) This reduces influence of supplier countries Costs are not excessive even if not all benefits can be calculated such as energy security, employment, technological leadership Reduction of energy consumption is crucial to keep energy bill constant (while prices increase) Strong political commitment and support from citizens have been most important 23
CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES Christian.egenhofer@ceps.eu Place du Congrès 1 B-1000 Brussels T: +32 2 229 3911 F: +32 2 219 4151 www.ceps.eu 24