Planting and Harvesting Crops

Similar documents
Agricultural Model Data Inputs and Assumptions: Presentation to the Water Quality GIT October, 2014

Nutrient Application Management November 20, 2014

Poultry in the Chesapeake Bay Program s Phase 6 Watershed Model

Review of Fertilizer Spread Options for Phase 6

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ENTERING TIER 1AND TIER 2 NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT BMPs INTO SCENARIO BUILDER AND THE WATERSHED MODELS

CAST Pass Through Factors and Deliverd Loads for New Wastewater Sources in Phase 6 Model

Review of Management Scenarios for the Chesapeake Bay Program s Phase 6 Watershed Model. David T. Lightle Erosion Model Consultant December 17, 2016

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Proposed Interim Application Reduction Efficiency

Soils Characterize how legacy nutrients (especially legacy P) impact nutrient losses from agricultural lands. 59,60,61,62

USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id)

E3 Model Scenario Purpose and Definitions

Chesapeake Bay Program Models:

Integrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model

Integrating erosion and phosphorus runoff assessment with nutrient management planning in SnapPlus

We re looking for residue Have you seen any?

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Construction Land Use

PHASE 6 COVER CROPS EXPERT PANEL

Nutrient Management Panel Phase 5 Report

Assessing Benefits of Winter Crops

Rapid National Model Assessments to Support US Conservation Policy Planning Mike White

Snap Plus and P Index Update. Larry Bundy, Sue Porter, and Laura Ward Good Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison & WDATCP

BMP Verification: What is it and How Will it Impact Pennsylvania?

Conventional Tillage 0-15% Residue Reduced Tillage 15-30% Residue Mulch Tillage >30 % Residue Ridge Tillage >30 % Residue

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information

Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST

Work-Load Issues Concerning the Use of RUSLE to Estimate Soil Losses in P Index Assessment Tools in the Mid-Atlantic Region

DRAFT Procedure used to estimate irrigation consumptive water use in the Susquehanna River Basin May 31, 2013

Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Modeling. Gary Shenk, Lewis Linker, Rich Batiuk Presentation to STAC 3/22/2011

Erosion, Erosion, Everywhere

Membership-Phase 6 Cover Crop Panel

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Phase 6 Land Use. Peter Claggett, U.S. Geological Survey Quentin Stubbs, U.S. Geological Survey

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation

Improved Simulation of Soil and. Manure Phosphorus Loss in SWAT

August 1994 Bulletin #XCM-175

Cover Crops and Soil Health

Agricultural Chemicals and Groundwater Protection

Watershed Model Structure. Dave Montali WV DEP Gary Shenk CBPO WQGIT 10/7/2014

Reporting of USDA Conservation Practices for Chesapeake Bay

Objectives of the Study

Maryland Nutrient Management Program

Part 1: Technical Requirements for Reporting and Crediting Manure Treatment BMPs without Monitoring Data

The Phosphorus Management Tool

Agricultural Phosphorus Management

Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients

Cover crops- Potential impacts on soil fertility and water quality

Nutrient Management in Kentucky

DEP Manure Management Manual COMPLETING A MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN PART 3

The Science of Integrated Crop Livestock Systems

Resource Conserving Crop Rotation & Alternative Livestock Watering System

Field Layout / 2012 Crop Plan Field I: acres FSA Farm / Tract Numbers:

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Diversified crop rotations balance productivity, profitability, and environmental quality

Residue for Cover Crops in RUSLE2

Cover Crops 101: Advice for Growers

December 2002 Issue # PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS. Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction

Potential Process to Update Manure Generation Data for Phase 6 Model. April 19 th, 2018

Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs

No-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management

SECTION 7. APPORTIONING DATA TO THE WATERSHED MODEL - HSPF SEGMENTATION AND LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Starter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont

Phase 6 Approval Process

Nutrient Management Examination Competency Areas Individual Specialists

Restoring the Water-Quality Conditions in the Chesapeake Bay: What is working and what still needs to be done

Cover Crops (Section 6.3)

Managing nutrient needs in organic farming. Judith Nyiraneza

WQ221 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests...

Annual Phosphorus Loss Estimator (APLE) Model Sensitivity Analysis. Guido Yactayo - UMCES

Cover crops and soil health. Erin Silva, Organic Production Specialist University of Wisconsin, Dept. of Plant Pathology

Greenhouse gases and agricultural: an introduction to the processes and tools to quantify them Richard T. Conant

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Intensification and nutrient management in dryland cropping systems. Jay B. Norton

Agriculture Action Packet DRAFT Attachment # FARM MAP EXAMPLE DRAFT

IS FALL TILLAGE FOLLOWING SOYBEAN HARVEST NECESSARY? 1/

How much nitrogen is in a healthy Iowa soil from 0-45?

SOLUTIONS. Developing Whole-Farm Nutrient Plans for Feedlots. For Open Feedlot Operators

Attachment # 1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Code. Title 25. Environmental Protection. Department of Environmental Protection

Incorporating monitoring, modeling and trends analyses into management decisions: a Choptank River example

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

Cover Crops and Soil Health Harvesting the Potential: Environmental Impacts of Cover Crops

MANURE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOSS WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND ON-FARM PHOSPHORUS INDEX IMPLEMENTATION. AN OVERVIEW OF ONGOING RESEARCH

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Highlights of various programs. Wetlands Reserve program (WRP)

Evaluation of Nutrient Use Efficiency Using County and Hydrologic Unit Nutrient Budgets for U.S. Cropland and Soil Test Summaries

Cover Crops Strategies After Short Season Crops

North Carolina State University. USDA, Agricultural Research Service Univ. MD Center for Environ. Science. Delaware Dep.

Reducing Livestock s Winter-Feed Costs. Mark Landefeld Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Monroe County

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 8: Employing Conservation Tillage Practices

1998 Missouri Crop Costs and 2000 Crop Cost of Production Estimates

AGRICULTURAL & APPLIED ECONOMICS

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow

Sector Load Growth Demonstration Technical Memorandum

Using Cover Crops to Reduce Leaching. Losses of Nitrate

EMERGENCY FORAGES: TARGETING GAPS IN THE GROWING SEASON. Nick Schneider 1/ Introduction

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D2-4 Conservation Tillage Practices

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Transcription:

Planting and Harvesting Crops Chesapeake Bay Program Agricultural Workgroup s Building a Better Bay Model Workshop 05/22/2013 Gary Shenk Chesapeake Bay Program s Integrated Analysis Coordinator Photos and graphics courtesy of USDA Image Gallery and CBP

Topics General review of Scenario Builder Placement of crops across the landscape Plant and Harvest Dates Exposed Soil and Plowing Effects Maximum uptake of nutrients by crops Nutrient application needs Application Timing Legume Fixation Manure and inorganic fertilizer

Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Tools Review of SB

Scenario Builder Review of SB Manure storage practice Livestock BMPs Crops BMPs Pasture Fertilizer BMPs BMPs Image Credits https://utextension.tennessee.edu/lincoln/4-h/pages/livestock-skillathons-%28beef,-sheep-and-swine%29.aspx Rebelwoodsranch.com Seaburst.com http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/442/442-308/442-308.html 4

Review of SB Scenario Builder Data Inputs and Outputs

Review of SB Digital Landscape Scenario Builder creates a digital landscape of land uses bases upon data from the Land Change Model and the USDA s Census of Agriculture. The new digital landscape is an aggregated representation of the county s land uses. Satellite Imagery Land Cover Digital Landscape

Review of SB Land-River Segments Land-River Segments Percent County Acres in LRSEG Land-River Segment ID Land Cover Group 1 agriculture 1.4% 2 agriculture 0.1% 3 agriculture 0.0% 4 agriculture 3.0% 5 agriculture 0.6% 6 agriculture 0.1% 7 agriculture 0.0% 8 agriculture 25.3% Percent Acres in LRSEG Each county is further broken down into modeling segments that contain sets of unique sub-watershed, political and hydrogeomorphic or climatic characteristics. The Land Change Model provides Scenario Builder the percent of a county s agricultural acres that exist within each LRSEG.

Review of SB Scenario Builder has 12 growth regions that inform plant and harvest dates for all crops based on freeze and frost data. State Agronomy Guides were used to determine growth regions. USDA 1990 Hardiness Zones were also used to determine growth regions.

Agricultural Land Uses Placement of crops Animal Feeding Operation Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Alfalfa* High-Till without Manure* High-Till with Manure* Hay without Nutrients Hay with Nutrients* Low-Till with Manure* Pasture* Degraded Riparian Pasture Nursery * Also has nutrient management version Each crop in the Census of Agriculture maps to a land use. Crop Name Alfalfa Hay Harvested Area Corn for Grain Harvested Area Lettuce, All Harvested Area Land Use Alfalfa High-Till with Manure High-Till without Manure

Placement of crops Census of Agriculture Scenario Builder uses the Census of Agriculture s acres of crops (including fallow acres) to determine the total agricultural acres for each county. Total agricultural acres in each county are then placed in each LRSEG according to fractions from the Land Change Model. State County Name Crop Name 1997 2002 2007 DE Kent Corn for Grain Harvested Area 42,274 43,548 55,105 DE Kent Soybeans for beans Harvested Area 80,709 68,647 57,251 DE Kent Wheat for Grain Harvested Area 26,229 20,509 22,367

Corn, Soybeans and Wheat Harvested Acres Through Time Placement of crops Acres Harvested 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 Corn Soybeans Wheat

Placement of crops Double Cropping Many agricultural acres produce more than one crop per year. Acres of Total Harvested Area reported by the Census of Agriculture should include double cropped acres. Scenario Builder breaks crops into those which are eligible for double cropping and those which are not Scenario Builder then breaks up the Total Harvested Area amongst cropped acres and double cropped acres.

Plant and Harvest Dates Plant and Harvest Dates Plant and harvest dates for crops inform timing of plant uptake, legume fixation and nutrient application. Data sources for plant and harvest dates include: Freeze/frost data from National Climatic Data Center Cooperative Extension factsheets Zadok s growth stages RUSLE 2 crop canopy estimates Somerset County, MD Crop Plant Date Harvest Date Corn for Grain 5/1 10/1 Soybeans 5/1 10/1 Tomatoes 7/1 9/1 Adams County, MD Crop Plant Date Harvest Date Corn for Grain 5/1 10/1 Soybeans 6/1 10/1 Tomatoes 6/1 10/1

Plant and Harvest Dates Hay, Alfalfa and Vegetables Scenario Builder currently uses only one date for planting and one for harvesting for each crop. Hay, alfalfa and most vegetables are harvested multiple times each year. First planting date and last harvest date are used for hay and alfalfa, while last planting data and last harvest date are used for vegetables.

Sediment Area Available to Raindrop Scenario Builder provides an aggregated area of land for each land use that is exposed and susceptible to raindrop erosion. Unexposed area is the greater of crop canopy cover crop residue cover Derived from RUSLE 2 for nearly 100 crop types. Erosion Exposed Soil

Plowing Effects Detached Sediment Along with the amount of land available to be eroded, Scenario Builder calculates the tons of sediment per acre that is detached by plowing. Detached sediment for plowing routines was informed by RUSLE 2.

Maximum Uptake Nutrient Uptake Scenario Builder defines nutrient uptake as all the nutrients removed from harvest AND from the roots and shoots of crops. Theoretical Nutrient Uptake values for each crop are calculated by combining Ag Census and literature. This theoretical uptake is transformed into Monthly Nutrient Uptake for each crop for each growing region based upon crop yield information and the number of growing degree days in each month.

Maximum Uptake Maximum Uptake Max Uptake for a crop is the 95 th percentile yield multiplied by the uptake per yield unit and adjusted downward 30% for typical maximum. Max uptake is a theoretical maximum that applies everywhere in the basin.

Local application Rates Application Rate States calculate best potential yield by crop and county DE: Average the highest 4 of the 7 Ag Census yields MD: Average the highest 60% of available Ag Census yields. NY, PA, WV Average highest 3 of last 5 Ag Census yields. The calculated value is limited to the 95 th percentile of all years and counties

Application Rate NM land Application Rate Maximum Application Rates were taken from state agronomy guides or nutrient management recommendations. The Maximum Application Rates are used where the Best Potential Yield is greater than the 95 th percentile of yields If the local yield is lower than the 95 th percentile by 20%, then the application is lower by the same percentage.

Non-Nutrient Management Application Rate Application Rate Non-Nutrient Management Application Rates are set between the maximum application rate and the local nutrient management rate: Non-nutrient management application rate = Maximum Application Rate ((1-fraction of Maximum Application Rate provided by organic nutrients) * 0.95 * (Maximum Application Rate - Nutrient Management Application Rate)) This means that Non-Nutrient Management Application Rates in counties with sufficient organic nutrients (manure and biosolids) to fulfill crop need will be higher than in counties without sufficient organic nutrients.

NM and nonnm applications Nutrient management land use Nutrient Management Adjusted for local conditions NM rate + 5% Toward Manure nonnm Non-Nutrient management land use Sliding scale Application Rate Maximum Application manure fertilizer manure fertilizer manure manure manure No manure some manure sufficient manure No manure some manure sufficient manure

Nutrient Application Timing Application Timing Application timing is informed by Zadok s growth stages and state nutrient management guides. The following methods are used in special cases: If nutrient management guide recommends nutrients prior to planting, nutrients are applied 20 days before planting. If not specified, small grains, hay and pasture nutrients are applied 60 days after planting. If guides recommend application when vines start to run, nutrients are applied 60 days after planting. If guides recommend nutrients banded with planter, nutrients are applied 0 days after planting. If guides recommend nutrients broadcast and disked in, nutrients are applied 20 days before planting.

Legume Fixation Legumes Some crops fix nitrogen from the atmosphere. This nitrogen fixation is accounted for in Scenario Builder as a source that fulfills a crop s nitrogen need. Nitrogen Fixation for subset of PA crops Crop Nitrogen Fixation (Lbs/Acre/Year) Alfalfa Hay 240 Green Lima Beans 300 Soybeans 130 Vetch Seed 300

Organic vs. Inorganic Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer Scenario Builder applies both organic and inorganic nutrients to crops. Organic nutrients are estimated based upon animal populations, and are supplied to the crop through manure. Inorganic nutrients (fertilizers) are used in two ways: To fulfill a crop whose need MUST be filled by inorganic nutrients as defined by agronomy guides, and To fulfill the leftover crop need when all organic nutrients are applied.

Issues to Consider What data are available that could modify the Model s assumptions for nutrient needs, crop yields and uptake? What data are available from the fertilizer industry, state chemistry labs, or other sources that could inform the Model about fertilizer use across the watershed? Are there data available to reflect organic and inorganic nutrient use across crop types? e.g., Can we definitively say that a percent of cropland for X crop in Y county does NOT receive manure? What data are available that could inform how both organic and inorganic nutrients are transported throughout the watershed from sales or production sites to be used on individual farms?