LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT

Similar documents
IRRIGATION DESIGN & MAINTENANCE FOR MAXIMUM EFFCIENCY

SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT LARGE LANDSCAPE LUNCHEON

Rainwater Harvesting

SMART Irrigation Controllers How smart are they?

Water Budgeting in California - MWELO

Michael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis

Sprinkler precipitation rates the key to controlling irrigation runoff

SMART Irrigation Controllers How smart are they?

Drip Irrigation Efficiency. Fact or Fiction?

Drip irrigation scheduling

SMART Irrigation Controllers How smart are they?

SIMPLE IRRIGATION WITH ETo

Maintaining Landscapes for Low Water Use

IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS

Monterey Salinas Transit Water Use Analysis for the Monterey Operations and Maintenance (TDA) Facility Renovation and Expansion Project

Sprinkler precipitation rates the key to controlling irrigation runoff

Landscape Water Management & Planning Blank Worksheets

Overview. Regional District of Nanaimo Team WaterSmart Drip / Micro Workshop. Water Source WATER METER. Backflow Prevention Devices

WaterSmart Workshops Strategies for Water-Efficient Landscapes

Irrigation Scheduling

Sizing Irrigation Fields

Sprinkler precipitation rates the key to controlling irrigation runoff

Appendix D Irrigation Standards

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Smart Irrigation Sales

RCAC. Estimating Landscape Irrigation Requirements

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

What s all the Fuss About ET Controllers? The Current State of Landscapes. Why the Need Public Agency Studies What s s Next.

HOW TO CREATE AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE FOR DRIP SYSTEMS

City of San Clemente Water Usage Report

Smart Irrigation Making Every Drop Count Master Gardner State Conference Oct , 2013

Choosing the Right Irrigation Equipment, Scheduling and Audit Requirements

Landscape Irrigation Auditor Blank Worksheets

Glossary Irrigation Terminology

Table of Contents Class 3 - Controller Programming

Drip, Drip, Drip Irrigation Pros/Cons

Rainwater Harvesting for Irrigation

Water Application Management in an Urban Setting

Sprinkler precipitation rates the key to controlling irrigation runoff

July By Charles Swanson, Extension Associate Guy Fipps, Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer

Purpose. These BMPs will be reviewed, evaluated, and updated periodically by the board. All comments and suggestions are welcomed by the Board.

The Real Dirt on Managing Recycled Water

Irrigation Scheduling in Orchards. Terry Prichard CE Water Management Specialist UC Davis Dept LAWR

GET AHEAD OR GET PARCHED: SIX WAYS TO SURVIVE THE DROUGHT

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

Michael Cahn, Barry Farrara, Tim Hartz, Tom Bottoms, and Mark Bolda

Continued Extreme Drought Conditions. April 1, 2015 Snowpack was lowest ever recorded. Impacts and Risk to People and Nature

Stanford University Water Efficiency Program Marty Laporte Jennifer Fitch Thomas Bartleman

SUSTAINABILITY: Principles, Techniques, Design, and Regulations

4c Using WinSLAMM to Evaluate LID Practices Hands-on Workshop. Using WinSLAMM to Evaluate LID Practices

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops Measurements for Irrigation. Lincoln Zotarelli Horticultural Sciences Department University of Florida Spring 2015

How to Inspect and Evaluate the Performance of Your Current Irrigation System. Brought to you by

Improving Nutrient Management through Advanced Irrigation Management

Conservation Strategies for Lawn Irrigation During Drought A Colorado Experience

Water-Efficiency Solutions in Landscape Irrigation

South Coast Water District 2016 Master Plan Updates

Tempering the Thirst Of America s Driest City

Evaluation of Irrigation Smart Controller for Salinity Control

Modified Blaney-Criddle for Excel

A New Type of Hybrid Groundwater Energy System

Report on Performance of ET Based Irrigation Controller. Prepared for the Cities of: Boulder, Greeley, and Longmont, Colorado

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Irrigation Management of Strawberries

HILLS CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION FROM:

South Coast Water District 2017 Master Plan Updates

Update on Conservation and Executive Order B Erik Ekdahl Director Office of Research, Planning, and Performance

Blaine Hanson Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis

A CASE FOR TARGETED WATER CONSERVATION OUTREACH

Irrigation Tech II HYDRAULIC TROUBLESHOOTING

Rainwater tank study of new homes

3Controlling. Your Controller

Green California Schools Summit Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

SmartIrrigation Apps. K.W. Migliaccio, G. Vellidis, C. Fraisse, K.T. Morgan, J. Andreis, D. Rowland, L. Zotarelli

Cascade Irrigation Efficiency Program Rebate Application

Assessing Real Time - Drainage Water Management

Student Water Managers

Illinois in Drought. June 19, 2012, Updated June 21, 2012

Report of the Working Group on Reducing Peak Water Demand

Electric Forward Market Report

ESP-SMT Smart Modular Control System. Installation & Operation Guide

Advancing Stormwater Beneficial Uses: ET Mapping in Urban Areas. Ryan Bean 1 and Robert Pitt 2

Residential Weather-Based Irrigation Scheduling: Evidence from the Irvine ET Controller Study

Sustaining Our Buildings & Grounds

Appendix B: NMCA BD Existing Irrigation System Evaluation

Initial Evaluation of Smart Irrigation Controllers: Year Two (2009) Results

TOWN Of CARY REQUIREMENTS

Landscape Water Management Strategies To Optimise Stormwater at RBG Melbour ne

SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY

Irrigation Systems CEU 257. Continuing Education from the American Society of Plumbing Engineers. March ASPE.

..Title Receive Report on Salinas Valley Water Conditions for the Third Quarter of Water Year

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES

Embedded Energy in Water Studies Study 1: Statewide and Regional Water-Energy Relationship

Nicola Minerva - Beta ADVANCES IN SUGAR BEET IRRIGATION Valladolid 5 June

Good Irrigation Water Management Practices. December 7, 2016

EVALUATION OF SMART IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS: YEAR 2010 RESULTS 1. By Charles Swanson and Guy Fipps, PhD, P.E 2. July 15, 2011

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM

12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply

Evaluation of Smart Irrigation Controllers: Year 2010 Results

Actions Taken. Implementation Comments. Qualification. State Water Resources Control Board Office of Research, Planning & Performance

Transcription:

Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) MAWA = (Eto x 0.62 x 0.45 x LA) + ( Eto x 0.62 x 0.55 x SLA) MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallon per year) Eto = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) = 45.09 0.62 = Conversion factor (to gallon per square foot) = 0.62 0.45 = ET Adjustment Factor (ETAF) = 0.45 LA = Area (square foot) = 6,185 0.55 = The additional ET Adjustment Factor for Special Area (1.0-0.45 = 0.55) = 0.55 SLA = Portion of the landscape area identified as Special Area (square foot) = 0 MAWA = ( 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.45 x 6,185 ) + ( 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.55 x 0 ) = 77,808 gallon per year Note: Effective Precipitation was not considered in this calculation. There is no recycled water system and no Special Areas CIMIS Station #156 Oxnard CA Sounth Coast Valley Eto (Inches) Water Month Budget % Jan 2.30 45% Feb 2.67 52% Mar 3.8 74% Apr 4.45 86% May 5.13 99% Jun 4.85 94% Jul 5.16 100% Aug 4.98 97% Sep 4.11 80% Oct 3.22 62% Nov 2.45 47% Dec 1.97 38% Annual Total 45.09 LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT Water conservation is achieved in this landscape construction document as described below. 1. All plant materials selected for this site were appropriate for the geographical location and local climate, their adaptability to drought. Data from WULCOLS III has been used for determining species' plant factor for the water use calculations. 2. Plants with similar water use requirements were grouped together. 3. 97% of landscape areas are planted with low water use plants, the balance with moderate use plants. No high water use plants are used. 4. Irrigation sections/hydrozones are separated by considering plant species factor, plant density and microclimate. If low water use plants are mixed with moderate water use plants in the same hydrozone, the moderate water use factor is used for water use calculations. See Hydrozone exhibit and table. 5. The irrigation system utilizes low-volume distribution system with a master valve, flow sensor, check valves, ET based automatic controllers with Cycle+Soak and water budgeting capability, weather station, rain shut-off. 6. The use of turf is eliminated. All tree, shrub and groundcover areas will be dressed with 2" layer of mulch moisture retention and to discourage weeds. 7. There is no Special Area in this project. Estimate Total Water Use (ETWU) ETWU = Eto x 0.62 x ( PF x HA / IE + SLA ) ETW U = Estimated water use per year (gallon per year) Eto = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) 0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallon per square foot) PF= Coefficient HA = Hydrozone Area (High, medium and low water use are in square feet), same as landscape area LA IE = Irrigation Efficiency SLA = Special Area (square feet) HYDROZONE ETWU = Eto x Conversion Factor x ( PF x HA / IE + SLA ) HZ 1 22,670 = 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.20 x 3,041 / 0.750 + 0 HZ 2 16,033 = 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.20 x 2,294 / 0.800 + 0 HZ 3 4,543 = 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.20 x 650 / 0.800 + 0 HZ 4 3,494 = 45.09 x 0.62 x 0.50 x 200 / 0.800 + 0 Total 46,740 gallon per year Estimated Total Applied Water (No effective precipitation is included) CIMIS Station #156 Oxnard CA % of Peak Month Sounth Coas Eto Eto (Water Budget) Monthly Applied Water January 3,038 Jan 2.3 45% (calculated from peak month February 3,527 Feb 2.67 52% Estimated Total Applied Water ) March 5,019 Mar 3.8 74% April 5,878 Apr 4.45 86% May 6,776 May 5.13 99% June 6,406 Jun 4.85 94% July 6,815 Jul 5.16 100% August 6,578 Aug 4.98 97% September 5,429 Sep 4.11 80% October 4,253 Oct 3.22 62% November 3,236 Nov 2.45 47% December 2,602 Dec 1.97 38% Estimated Total Applied Water (ETAW) 59,555 gallon per year Annual Total 45.09 (Less than MAWA ) Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) 77,808 gallon per year Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) 46,740 gallon per year (Less than MAWA ) Hydrozone Information Table La ndsca pe Coe fficie nt (Kl) Kl = Ks x Kd x Kmc Ks Species factor Kd Density factor Kmc Microclimate factor Hydrozone Controller Valve # Pla nt W a te r Use* Species Factor(Ks) Density Factor (Kd) Micro-climate Factor (Kmc) Coe fficie nt (Kl) Plant Type Irrigation Method** IE (Irriga tion Efficiency) Area w/ slope fa ctor (LA) squa re fe e t Kl x LA (Sq. Ft.) Ground Plane Gradient Gradient M ultiplie r Area - potable w a te r (sq.ft.) S pe cia l Area -recycled w a te r (sq.ft.) PR HZ 1 2, 4 L 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.20 S,G LVS (4 SQ) 0.75 3,041 HZ 2 5, 7 L 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.20 S B 0.80 2,294 HZ 3 3, 6 L 0.2 1.0 1.2 0.24 T B 0.80 650 HZ 4 1 M 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.60 T B 0.80 200 608.2 flat 1 3,041 0 0.60 458.8 flat 1 2,294 0 2.00 156 flat 1 650 0 2.00 120.0 flat 1 200 0 2.00 6,185 Peak Month Irrigation Run Time Calculation Peak Month Watering Schedule FRICTION LOSS CALCULATION T = 60 x D x Eto x Kc / PR x IE T = Sprinkler run time in minutes 60 = Constant for conversion of area, flow, inches per hour and inches per day into common units D = Water frequency in days Eto Reference evapotranspiration rate in inches per day Kc = Crop Coefficient (used Ks, Species Factor) PR = Precipitation rate of the area, in inches per hour IE = Application efficiency of the system, percent Irrigation Efficiency Bubblers 80% Rotor 75% Low Volume Spray 75% CIMIS Station #156 Oxnard CA Month Eto Days Daily Eto Water (inches) Budget Jan 2.3 31 0.074 45% Feb 2.67 28 0.095 52% Mar 3.8 31 0.123 74% Apr 4.45 30 0.148 86% May 5.13 31 0.165 99% Jun 4.85 30 0.162 94% Jul 5.16 31 0.166 100% Aug 4.98 31 0.161 97% Sep 4.11 30 0.137 80% Oct 3.22 31 0.104 62% Nov 2.45 30 0.082 47% Dec 1.97 31 0.064 38% Annual Total 45.09 Frequency of watering 1 Everyday Maxim um Run Tim e = (Infiltration rate / Precipitation rate ) x 60 2 Every 2 days For clay loamy soil Infiltration rate: 0.25 inch/hour 3 Every 3 days Precep. For Bubbler (0.25 / 3.000 ) x 60 = 3 5 minutes Precep. for Low 30 min. Voluem Spray 0.8 (0.25 / 0.600 ) x 60 = 19 minutes Soak Time between Cycles Irrigation Method Spray LVS Low Volume R Rotor B Low Volume Bubbler Cycle Starting Time 3am Irrigation Hydrozone Controller station no. Method Frequency of watering Number of Cycles Run Time (minutes) no. of valve stations per Hz Runtime per HZ Plant Type HZ 1 2, 4 LVS (4 SQ) 1 1 4 2 8 S,G Shrubs & Groundcover, Low HZ 2 5, 7 B 1 1 1 2 2 S Shrubs, Low HZ 3 3, 6 B 1 1 1 2 2 T Trees, Low PROJECT NAME: Victory Outreach Church 16035 Job No. : Data Give By: Steve Newman WATER SUPPLIER: Oxnard City Water Services PHONE: 805.385.7914 DATE: 7/18/2016 STATIC PRESSURE: 60 PSI LOCATION : 2311 Statham, Oxnard CA P.O.C. Location: ELEVATION: 38.45 7 VALVE NO: FLOW RATE : 20 GPM SERVICE LINE n/a 2" 30 feet loss/100' 0.24 0.1 PSI WATER METER size: 1" 0.9 PSI BACKFLOW size: 1-1/2" 6.0 PSI FLOW METER size: 1-1/2" 1.0 PSI HYDROZONE T = 60 x D x Daily Eto x Kc / ( PR x IE ) Actual Applied Water per One Watering HZ 1 4 = 60 x 1 x 0.166 x 0.200 / ( 0.60 x 0.75 ) 102 = HZ 2 1 = 60 x 1 x 0.166 x 0.200 / ( 2.00 x 0.80 ) 41 = HZ 3 1 = 60 x 1 x 0.166 x 0.240 / ( 2.00 x 0.80 ) 39 = HZ 4 4 = 60 x 1 x 0.166 x 0.600 / ( 2.00 x 0.80 ) 45 = Total 227 gallon s Watering per month X 31 Total Applied Water per Month 7,043 = GPM per Hydrozone x Watering Time (minutes) 23 x 4 33 x 1 26 x 1 12 x 4 HZ 4 1 B 1 2 2 1 4 T Trees, M oderate Total minutes* Total Hours* 16 0.27 S = Shrub T =Tree *Total watering m inutes/hours do not include the tim e for valves open and close. TF=Turf G=Ground covers This irrigation watering schedule has been prepared as a part of landscape documentation package prior to construction. V=Vine P = Palm TF = Turf Since an accurate agricultural soils analysis will not be performed until after site grading is done but prior to landscape installation, adjustments in watering time and cycle may be needed depending on the final site conditions and soil type. ELEV CHG. 40 1.55 0.7 PSI MAINLINE PIPE: 1-1/2" 495 2.2 PSI Sch.40 feet loss/100' 0.44 PSI 2" 0 feet loss/100' 0 PSI 0.0 PSI MASTER VALVE size: 1-1/2" 3.9 PSI R.C.V. size: 1" 2.9 PSI Basket Strainer n/a 0.0 PSI LATERAL PIPE/FITTINGS (allowance) 5.0 PSI PRESSURE @ HEAD 20.0 PSI TOTAL PRESSURE LOSS: 42.6 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 17.4 PSI