The Freese Scale for Grassland Biodiversity

Similar documents
How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

The Monongahela National Forest

The National Fire Plan: Managing the Impacts of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment. An Overview and Look Ahead

How Much Habitat is Enough?

PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Climate Change Adaptation. Lynn Helbrecht Climate Change Coordinator

Introduction: Prior Knowledge Needed: Common Student Misconceptions: Objective/Learning Target: Platte Basin Timelapse Project LESSON PLAN - Sandhills

land more than 20 years ago and continues to expand these efforts.

MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MMR) REGIONAL CORRIDOR

Coastal Prairie Management and Conservation (2018)

2018 Arkansas State Wildlife Grant Pre-proposal

Land Between The Lakes NRA Job and Income Contributions for 2014 At A Glance

Implementing new nature conservation policies to deliver biodiversity gains. Peter Brotherton Head of Biodiversity

Providing a forum for businesses to make their voices heard, share best practices, highlight accomplishments, be part of the solution, engage

Sustainable Recreation

Nez Perce - Clearwater NFs Job and Income Contributions for 2014 At A Glance

San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Need to Change Analysis June 2015

2015 SUSTAINABILITY ANNUAL REPORT

Atlasof Biodiversity

The Great Lakes (Ecosystems Of North America) By Sharon Katz READ ONLINE

6-3 Biodiversity Slide 1 of 35

The Natural Choice: An overview of The Natural Environment White Paper (NEWP) David Kingsley-Rowe Lead Advisor Natural England

Collaborative Management for Success A Collaborative, Science-based Vision for Conservation Success

THE SAN DIEGO DECLARATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND FIRE MANAGEMENT

Mukwonago River Watershed Protection Plan Recommendations & Implementation Update Friends of Mukwonago River March 16, 2013 Mukwonago, WI

Adapting restoration performance measures to the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge

Centre for Wildlife Studies

Forests render numerous goods and services and help

P.O. Box 216 Frazier Park, CA 93225

Preserving Biodiversity

Managing Grassland Ecosystems: Student Worksheet

Long Term Strategic Plan

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local

April 2, Lloyd McGee, President Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition 565 West 5 th Colville, Washington 99114

by 2010 or beyond and what are the implications for the Convention on Biological Diversity?

Alberta Conservation Association 2010/11 Project Summary Report

JOB TITLE: JOB LOCATION: January 2, WHO ARE WE? conservation, scientists and. declines. managers and. on restoring. Central Valley.

For Earth Day, the Swinomish tribe gathered together to pick up trash within their community. Photo credit: Flickr/NWIFC

BLY 303 Lecture Notes, 2011 (O Brien) Introduction to Ecology

Environmental Literacy Model (ELM)

Preparing for the Storms: Municipal Adaptation for Climate Change Resiliency

Ch. 11 Biodiversity. Central Case: Saving the Siberian tiger

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

Strong site and year specific needs, particularly driven by annual systems Well drained, <1200 m, over diverse soil types

Tom Sherman Land Acquisition

Chapter 7 Livestock Grazing and Rangeland Issues

Bioe 515 Lec 4: Environmental gradients, landscape pattern, ecological function

UNFF12 Panel on contribution of CPF members, UN partners And stakeholders FAO Intervention

GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW) A home-grown ecological goods and services program for Manitoba

Ecological Footprint Calculator

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative 2017 Online Public Forum Summary Report

Chapter 56 Conservation Biology and Global Change

Listening to the Prairie: Farming in Nature's Image

ALUS CANADA 2017 Report. Ontario Wildlife Foundation. September 2017

Tim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural Resources Division Mat Millenbach, Western Rivers Conservancy Sarah Beesley, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program

Integration of climate change adaptation : site and landscape responses. Simon Duffield Natural England

Overview of Vol.3, No.4 - Restoration and Reclamation in Agricultural Landscapes

ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION WORKSHOP

Government Response. to the Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia

Ecology. Mrs. Flannery

Climate-Smart Landscape Conservation Planning & Design

Gulf Hypoxia Initiative Conservation Practices for Wildlife, Water Quality, Energy & Agricultur

Kansas Natural Resources and Environmental Management

September 2016 ID Competency Statement Type

Sustainable Watershed Systems, through Asset Management. Local stream stewardship volunteers may yet be the difference-maker

DECISION MEMO FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HOLY JIM CREEK CROSSING REPLACEMENT

February 4, Erik Merrill, ISAB Coordinator; Jim Ruff, ISAB Ex Officio; and Laura Robinson, Program Implementation and Liaison Specialist

Environmental Stewardship Award

FACT SHEET: BLM, USFS Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Effort

Forage Monitoring and Utilization 1

Community Outreach Summary from Phase 2

Development of a Statewide Wetland Reference Network for Montana. Karen Newlon and Linda Vance Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT

forests strengthened support Sustainable Strategy

Charting a Course: Using whole farm planning to balance business and family. Partners and Sponsors. WI Grassland Resources. Grazing Broker Assistance

Consei va ti on. Biology. Sinauer Associates Inc. Puhlishe. Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A

Melbourne Principles For Sustainable Cities

Partnership for Gulf Coast Land Conservation Annual Meeting August 21, 2012

Outline. A Permanent Agriculture 3/17/2014. Integrating Perennial Grasses for Sustainable Agricultural Systems to Maximize Farm Profitability

Suggested responses to Future Farming Consultation

The Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan Partnership

The Accountability Framework

Gap. Pipeline. Secured. (USD) Thousands. - Law Enforcement & PA Management. Transboundary Coorperation. Tiger Reintroduction. Community Engagement

13/12/2016 BIODIVERSITY BIODIVERSITY BIODIVERSITY IS IMPORTANT SEA OTTER EXAMPLE

Foundations of Restoration Ecology

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble Participants Principles Collaborate Reduce the threat of unnatural crown fire.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: NATURAL RESOURCES AND FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Integrating the Protection of Healthy Waters in Tribal Clean Water Act Section 319 and other Water Quality Programs

Recommendations to Enhance Wildlife Benefits of the 2018 Farm Bill

Design With Nature: How to Create an Old Growth Forest. Chuck Pettis Earth Sanctuary

UK Forestry Standard 2017

Where Funds are Spent

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Chris S. Pease U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force

How does basic scientific research done at Kansas universities benefit Kansas citizens?

Application of the Montreal Process Criteria & Indicators at National and Sub-national Scales

Biodiversity: It s In Our Nature An Introduction

Focus Area 2: Restoring value to grassland. Recap and progress update

Enclosed farmland: Arable and Horticultural, Improved and Neutral Grasslands

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

Transcription:

The Freese Scale for Grassland Biodiversity 1 American Prairie Reserve s Philosophy and Approach to Biodiversity Centered Land Management American Prairie Reserve s (APR) approach to biodiversity restoration is built around the Freese Scale for Grassland Restoration. Developed by conservation biologist Dr. Curt Freese, the Freese Scale (pronounced Fray -zee) identifies the ten major ecological drivers for restoring and conserving biodiversity on temperate grasslands. This scale can be used by land managers trying to achieve a balance between agricultural production and biodiversity as well as those, like APR, which are solely focused on maximizing native prairie biodiversity. Each year, our biologists rate all APR properties on the Freese Scale and develop management plans aimed at achieving incremental improvement on each property s score. On our web site, we post an account of our restoration and science efforts (e.g., bison management, reintroduction of fire, and stream restoration) and the progress we re making in moving our landscape along the Freese Scale. We welcome your questions and comments. 1

APR s Philosophy The overarching goal of American Prairie Reserve (APR) is to restore and conserve the biodiversity species, habitats and ecological processes that was native to this region for the past several thousand years. In doing so, we recognize that the prairie ecosystem is a highly dynamic place and that species, habitats and ecological processes vary and shift across the land over time. Thus, our goal is not to restore biodiversity to some predetermined, unchanging condition. Rather, our goal is to restore the natural ecological conditions that are most important for maintaining a fully functioning, self-sustaining ecosystem endowed with the diversity of life the region once harbored. As has been the case for millennia, humans will be part of this ecosystem but not in the command-and-control manner that prevails over most of our lands. To help guide our actions over time, we have developed a scale that evaluates land management based on ten ecological conditions that have been most affected by human activities, particularly commodity production (livestock and grain), on lands in the APR region. Each condition is measured on a 7-point scale arranged along a continuum. At one end is commodity management, which describes activities like grain or cattle production that are common in the APR region and that have substantially altered ecological conditions. At the other end of the continuum is biodiversity management, which represents ecological conditions that should be in place when biodiversity conservation is the primary goal for the land. The result is a scale that tracks the effects of different management decisions on ecological conditions, providing APR with a tool to assess our progress as we transition lands from a primary focus on livestock and grain production to a focus on biodiversity. We want to emphasize that not all commodity producers operate at the far end of the continuum away from conservation. In fact, most in the APR region are well aware of many biodiversity values of their land and take measures to conserve native prairie and much of its wildlife. Moreover, human infrastructure such as power lines and roads are not solely due to commodity production needs, but they do impact important ecological conditions. We therefore also incorporate these concerns where appropriate in the scale. Prairie wildlife is resilient, an evolutionary adaptation to the boom-and-bust conditions of life on the Great Plains. This is why we ve adopted a build it and they will come philosophy to managing American Prairie Reserve (APR) lands. Prairie plants and animals will bounce back to their former abundance if we restore the ecological conditions the large and dynamic playing field to which they are so well adapted. There is much to learn as we move ahead. As APR managers, we need to be as adaptive and resilient as prairie wildlife.

How the Freese Scale Works The Freese Scale allows biodiversity-focused land managers to periodically evaluate their properties and track progress towards creating a fully functioning, native prairie ecosystem. The left hand side of the ten-point scale shows the characteristics associated with commodity-focused management and the right hand side shows characteristics of biodiversity-centered management. The scale does not imply that one is better than the other. Rather, it is a guide for land managers interested in converting landscapes previously used for commodity production into prairie ecosystems with a full complement of native biodiversity. For further reading on the background of the scale, download the PDF of Dr. Curt Freese s article: Managing Grasslands for Biodiversity Value.

APR s Approach to Rating Reserve Landscapes Each year, our land managers, in conjunction with a variety of partners, rate the Reserve s properties using the Freese Scale. Biologists tour the reserve by foot, horseback and vehicles working as a team to agree upon a score for each management unit. The chart below is an example of this process. The total score for a particular area is recorded and retained, allowing for annual comparisons. Armed with this information, our managers decide what approaches in management could lead to an improved score for a particular area of the Reserve.

Importance of Collaborations In our efforts to create one of the richest and most biologically diverse large-scale grassland ecosystems on earth, APR benefits from assistance and collaboration from the following organizations and agencies. Each brings unique value to our efforts to evaluate current biodiversity conditions, and in planning and implementing future restoration activities. We welcome additional partners interested in moving this extraordinary project forward. Please contact us if you d like to join this growing team of contributors. National Geographic World Wildlife Fund Wildlife Conservation Society U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Land Management Montana Audubon Montana State University Ft. Belknap Indian Reservation

Summary By using the Freese Scale, our management team seeks to create and maintain an easy to use system for improving and preserving biodiversity on the Reserve. Our goal is to create a common language so that all contributors are aligned and working effectively together towards this common goal. Please contact us if you would like to learn more about our approach to biodiversity management or if you would like to volunteer to help with annual evaluations and management efforts on American Prairie Reserve.