Matt Leach, P.E. CH2M. Mark Eppich, P.E. City of Columbus Division of Water. S. Dean Ramsey, P.E. CH2M

Similar documents
Expanding Capacity and Treatment. Treatment Plant

Integrating Ozone and Ion Exchange into a 40 Year Old Lime Softening Plant

Process Treatment Selection and. Jeff Macomber, P.E. One Water Conference August 28, 2014

Disinfection By-Products Reduction and SCADA Evaluation and WTP Sludge Removal System and Dewatering Facility

Ohio Section AWWA NW District Fall Meeting April 20, City of Delaware Water Plant Improvements

Submerged Membranes to Replace Media Filters to Increase Capacity 4X for a Small Community. Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering, Inc.

Columbus Taste and Odor Event

Innovative Approach to Expanding the Olentangy WTP

MAKING THE SWITCH FROM LIME TO MEMBRANE SOFTENING: WHEN IS IT THE RIGHT TIME? Introduction

Summary of Flint s Implementation of Veolia s Recommendations

Trihalomethane Formation Concern

SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPTIMIZATION

Innovative Improvements to a 53-Year Old Water Plant for HABs, Crypto, and Whatever Else the Maumee River Brings

TTHM Reduction Corrective Action Update 1 st Progress Meeting October 18, Robert Horvat, P.E x1501

Removing Algal Toxins from the Toledo Tap

Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant Upgrades Status Update

The City of Columbus. Water Quality Monitoring in Central Ohio

Water Treatment Plant Year-end Report for 2014

ADVANCED WATER OPERATIONS PART I COURSE OUTLINE 45 HOURS MINIMUM

Disinfection Byproducts in the Drinking Water What Does it Mean and What is Being Done

Disinfection By-Products Reduction and SCADA Evaluation and WTP Sludge Removal System and Dewatering Facility

Zero Liquid Discharge Project Extends Potable Water Supplies

DBP Reduction and SCADA Improvements at the SGWASA Water Treatment Plant

Water Treatment Plant Phase 1 Upgrades CMAR Selection Pre-Submittal Meeting

Fridley Filter Plant Rehabilitation

Comparing Carbons for Disinfection Byproduct Control. Maggie H. Pierce, EI Sara N. Gibson, PE Mark M. Bishop, PE David S.

A. Yavich, Ph.D., P.E. Optimization Solutions Environmental, LLC Grand Rapids, MI

Meeting Manganese Removal Goals: A Pilot Study

Tiffin Water Treatment Plant. Comprehensive Facility Plan (Audit)

PIONEERING PELLET SOFTENING TREATMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA

biologically active filtration

FROM RAW WATER INTAKE TO DISTRIBUTION NETWORK: THE JOURNEY OF DBP CONTROL

Overcoming Challenges to Achieve Optimization at the Crown Water Treatment Plant. Barbara Martin AWWA Mark Petrie Cleveland Water

INITIAL OPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT TREATMENT PROCESSES AND FINISHED WATER QUALITY CITY OF TYLER, TEXAS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...

WRF Webcast Biofilter Conversion Guidance Manual

Utility Partner Data Report

Comparison of Plant Processes and Operations for Producing Potable Water from the Available Source Water

PNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE

Hetch Hetchy Treatability at the Sunol Valley Water Treatment Plant

CHLORAMINE REPLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION

Isabelle Papineau, Ph.D., École Polytechnique de Montréal Yves Dionne (V de G) and Benoit Barbeau (EPM)

Robert T. Shoaf, P.E., BCEE Presented by John Krinks, PE

Side by Side Piloting of Process Alternatives Yields Direct Performance Comparison

THIS POLICY DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW

Improved Membrane Design Addresses Integrity Issues for the City of Yuba City Water Treatment Plant

City of Topeka Utilities Department

Trials and Tribulations of Building a Pilot Plant:

Georgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised May 2018

Public Utilities Department April 13, 2017 Delaware Citizens Academy Brad Stanton, Director

Data Analytics and Water Treatment Process Optimization

Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Compliance Update

WATER INTAKE & DISTRIBUTION MM1

Backup Generators Bacon Road Water Treatment Plant Case Study

Ferric Sulfate Success Story - OWASA s Switch to Ferric Sulfate Leads to a Reduction in Disinfection Byproducts

Granular Activated Carbon System

Performance of GAC Filter-Adsorbers for Herbicide and DBP Control at Higginsville,, MO

Cary/Apex Water Treatment Facility- Ozone Biofiltration Pilot Study

Chlorine Dioxide One Year Later. Shazelle Terry Treatment & WQ Department Manager

Trihalomethane Formation Concern

Comparing the Leopold Clari-DAF System to Upflow Contact Clarification

THIS POLICY DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW

City of Davis Introduction of Surface Water. Community Meeting May 5, 2016

Testing Finished Water Meters A Low Tech Approach

Balancing Microbial Control and Stage 2 DBP Rule Compliance (at Ocean City, Maryland)

Utility Partner Data Report

Georgia Power Plant Bowen NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised December 2017

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), is now regulated

NELSONVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS

Rule R Facility Design and Operation: Miscellaneous Treatment Methods.

DW Module 23: Organic Removal Answer Key

City of Enderby Water Treatment Plant

Our Mission. Where Our Water Comes From. History of Our Water System. The Report: License to Operate:

Pittsburgh Water Treatment Plant Projects. by Jay R. Lucas, P.E. Senior Project Manager

Evaluation of Powdered Activated Carbon Feed System For Taste and Odor Removal at City of Camden WTP. Jane Gan

City of Boca Raton s NF Plant: A Plant History

Controlling Trihalomethanes and the Costs Associated with their Minimization using Automated On-Line Monitoring with the THM-RR system

Public Utilities Department City of Bossier City, Louisiana

How are they doing? Check-up on the Enaville and Glenns Ferry Microfiltration WTPs

Optimizing the Ballasted Sedimentation Process at the Anacortes Water Treatment Plant Jeff Marrs Plant Manager Greg Pierson - HDR

Disinfection By-Products

Long Point Water Treatment Plant Process Evaluation and Design Upgrades for Performance Enhancement; Dover, DE

Basic Steps in DW Treatment Process. Water Treatment. EPA and DBP s. Scottsdale Chaparral DW Plant

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS OF USING DYNAMIC SIMULATION SOFTWARE TO OPTIMIZE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPERATIONS

Seasonal Source Water Quality and Treatment Challenges Town of Newburgh s Chadwick Lake Filtration Plant

A New Approach to Drinking Water Nitrate Removal. Ali Dorri Director of Business Development

The Town of Davie (town) operates a

DW Module 22 Inorganic Removal Basics Answer Key

A Flight Plan for Success: Practical Aspects of Pilot Testing in Planning, Design and Optimization

Dipti Shah, Town of Gilbert Tuesday, January 25, 2011

CASE STUDY. In-Tank THM Removal System Achieves Over 50 Percent Reduction. Texas Utility Reaches Compliance for First Time in 5 Years.

Microbiological Aspects of Drinking Water Treatment. CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology Tim Ellis October 12, 2006

St. John the Baptist Parish

Drinking Water Supply and

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

RECORD DRAWINGS NOTE: alt32 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN 310 OLD VINE STREET, SUITE 300 LEXINGTON, KY 40507

Water Treatment Plant Design at the Idaho Cobalt Project

WEF Collection Systems Conference Evaluation of High ph Infiltration Water and Recycled Bedding Material

Economic and Design Considerations for Membrane Filtration at a Lime Softening Plant BACKGROUND

ARNPRIOR WATER FILTRATION PLANT ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT

Transcription:

Matt Leach, P.E. CH2M Mark Eppich, P.E. City of Columbus Division of Water S. Dean Ramsey, P.E. CH2M 1

Presentation Topics Project Background Project Team Unique Challenges and Opportunities Risk Assessment and Mitigation Factors That Cannot be Controlled Quality and Quantity Quantity Quality Current Project Status/Lessons Learned 2

3 PROJECT BACKGROUND

Columbus, OH Service Area 7.2 Billion Gal Parsons Ave. (groundwater) 15.9 Billion Gal Dublin Rd. Hap Cremean 25.6 Billion Gal Dublin Rd. Water Plant City of Columbus Hap Cremean Water Plant 48.7 billion gallons in 2015 83% surface water Service population 1.16 million Parsons Ave. Water Plant (groundwater) 4

Treatment Plant Site COUNTY ENGINEER TREATMENT PLANT (1907/1972) US 33 PUBLIC ACCESS ADMIN BLDG 5 POST OFFICE RAILROAD

Existing Treatment Process Scioto River Conventional Lime Softening Plant 65 MGD Capacity Rapid Mix Flocculator Turbidity Settling Rapid Mix Flocculator Softening Settling Re-carbonation Filters Clearwell POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE PAC R3 ALUM Turbidity Basins 1 & 2 SODIUM HYDROXIDE SODA ASH LIME Softening Basins 2 & 3 Recarbonation Basin 4 CO2 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE FLUORIDE Dual Media Filters West East ZN ORTHO-PHOSPHATE Scioto River Residual R7 Residual R1 Residual R2 Residual R3 Residual R2 6

Plant Treatment Goals Total Hardness: 120 mg/l to 125 mg/l as CaCO3 Alkalinity: >35 mg/l as CaCO3 Total Organic Carbon (TOC): <2.0 mg/l Nitrate: < 10 mg/l as N Atrazine: <2.5 ppb (MCL= 3.0 ppb) Stage 2 DBP Compliance: Target 80% of Location Running Annual Average (LRAA) and Operational Evaluation Level Comply with all primary drinking water regulations Taste and Odor 7

New Treatment Processes & Upgrades to 80 MGD Biologically Active Carbon Filters New Recarbonation System Ozone Ion Exchange Residuals Handling, Electrical, Pump Station, and Miscellaneous Plant Upgrades 8

9 PROJECT TEAM

Project Team Plant Operations & Maintenance Tools to the Operations Staff Pre- Construction Use 10

11 UNIQUE CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES

UNIQUE CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES Three Plants in System All Three Scheduled for Renovation Same Period Dual Power Feed to Plant Both Thru Same Substation Significant New Users Added to One Circuit City Owns Power System Dublin Rd. Water Plant City of Columbus Hap Cremean Water Plant Parsons Ave. Water Plant (groundwater) Plant Maintains System Pressures Short Response Time 12

13 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

Risk Assessment & Mitigation Ongoing Process in All Phases of Work Condition Assessment Criticality of Each Piece of Equipment Consequences of Failure Phasing Regulatory and Schedule Impacts Pilot Testing Capability of Processes/Potential Modifications Design Details-Construction Restrictions & Sequencing 14

Risk Assessment & Mitigation CONTRACTOR ENTRANCE 940 Construction Contract Phasing IEB CONTRACT 4 OGB OCB RCB CO2 TEMPORARY PUBLIC/EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE 15 TWIN RIVERS DRIVE POND PARK PARKING 910 15

16 FACTORS THAT CANNOT BE CONTROLLED

FACTORS THAT CANNOT BE CONTROLLED KEY FACTORS System Demand Weather Raw Water Quality MITIGATION FACTORS Share Demand Between Plants Upstream Monitoring Provide Tools for Treatment Plant Personnel Prepared 17

18 MAINTAINING QUANTITY & QUALITY

Phasing Criteria Quality & Quantity Regulatory Compliance Personnel & Public Safety Risk Assessment Contractor Work Areas/Interference/Use of Site Coordination with Construction at Other WTP Schedule and Approvals 19

20 QUANTITY

QUANTITY Three Plants System Hydraulic Model Demand Projections Power Upgrades 21

QUANTITY Replacement of: Residuals Pump Station High Service Pumps Raw Water Pumps Electrical System 22

23 QUALITY

QUALITY Approved Capacity for Each Process (OEPA) Upstream Monitoring Pilot Testing Existing New Historical Plant Data 24

CONSTRUCTION HOUSEKEEPING Filters Enclosure Requirements Performance Enforcement Exterior Improvements Open Basins Inflow Equipment in Basins High Service Pumps Control Room & Lab Crane in basin or filter 25

FILTERS Pilot tested existing and proposed media Rate (2.0 gpm/ft 2 to 3.4 gpm/ft 2 ) Performance Filters Out of Service Housekeeping Testing and Backwash 26

27 FILTERS

CHEMICAL FEED SYSTEMS Virtually every system rehabilitated or replaced Condition Assessment Risk Assessment Min. Tanks in Service Coordinate w/ Suppliers Removal w/o damaging Adjacent Tanks 28

RECARBONATION SYSTEM Installed a new Secondary System Operations prior to Shutdown of Existing Rental Tank during Switchover TEMPORARY RECARB EXISTING RECARB 29 NEW RECARB 29

POLYMER Coagulant Aid & Filter Aid Polymers Bench scale screening Plant scale testing Regulatory Approval Pre-Construction System Left in Place 30

31 PROJECT STATUS & LESSONS LEARNED

LESSONS LEARNED Expect the Unexpected PAC Quality Nitrate Event Need to Sweat the Small Stuff Chemical Deliveries (24/7) Good Housekeeping Emphasize Criticality Early Communication Sequencing & Restrictions Continuous Improvement Know Your Plant DESIGN & CM TEAM CITY STAFF CONTRACTOR 32

PROJECT STATUS 2014 2015 2016 Av. TOC 2.82 2.11 1.57 MIB Geosmin % Removal 66 65.4 69.9 RAW 3.66 7.14 TAP <1.0 <1.0 DRWP THM (ug/l) 15-Jun 16-Jun % reduction AVG 54.9 33.2 39 33

PROJECT STATUS 2014 2015 2016 Av. TOC 2.82 2.11 1.57 % Removal 66 65.4 69.9 DRWP THM (ug/l) 15-Jun 16-Jun % reduction AVG 54.9 33.2 39 DRWP HAA (ug/l) 15-Jun 16-Jun % reduction AVG 33.7 24.9 26 34

35 Thank you!

36 Questions?

37 37

38 38

Existing Treatment Plant Site Original Plant -- 1907 Existing Plant Constructed --mid 1970 s No option to obtain additional property Railroad Post Office Major Road plus Scioto River County Engineers Office and Abandoned Landfill Department of Public Utilities Office Complex 1980 s 39

Existing Treatment Plant Site Multi Purpose Site Treatment Plant DPU Administrative Offices Fleet Maintenance Facilities Support Facilities and Personnel Access Required at All Times Public Access and Parking Space for Future Treatment Requirements 40

TEMPORARY RECARB EXISTING RECARB 41 NEW RECARB 41