Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations Cindy Thieman Hood River Watershed Group Ed Salminen & Niklas Christensen Watershed Professionals Network
Hood River Water Conservation Planning Elements: Analysis of water supply & demand, streamflow impacts from predicted climate change, water conservation potential, and effects on salmon & steelhead habitat Partners: Hood River County, Irrigation Districts, Confederated Tribes of the Warms Springs, Hood River Watershed Group, ODFW, DEQ, OWRD Grants: U. S. Bureau of Reclamation- Basin Study grant ($250,000 in-kind work from Reclamation) and WaterSMART grant ($100,000 cash for final water conservation planning and outreach) Oregon Water Resource Department- $250,000 cash for Water Use Assessment, Water Conservation Assessment, IFIM study
Overview of Water Planning Study Climate Change Models Water Use Assessment Water Conservation Assessment Water Storage Assessment Surface Water Model (DHSVM) Groundwater Model (MODFLOW) Fish Habitat Analysis (IFIM) Water Resources Alternatives Impacts & Recommendations
Water Use - Irrigation Average Monthly Diversion Water Diversion (cfs) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept DID EFID FID MFID MHID
Water Use - Hydropower 60 MFID 50 Flow (CFS) 40 30 20 10 0 Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept
Water Use - Instream Threatened Species: -Spring & fall Chinook -Winter & summer steelhead -Coho -Bull trout Key Limiting Factors: -Summer flows
Water Use - Instream East Fork above Middle Fork 500 Streamflow (cfs) 400 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mean Flow Instream Right (1983)
Water Use - Instream 18000 East Fork Hood River (below EFID diversion)- spring Chinook Amount of Suitable Habitat 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 Spawning WDFW HSC Fry Rearing Juvenile Rearing Adult Holding 2000 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Flow cfs
Climate & Future Water Management How is climate predicted to change in Hood River County? (Modeling for 2030 2060) How will water availability for irrigation be affected? What are the alternatives? What will fish habitat availability look like under these alternatives?
Projected Climate Change Projected Climate Change (2030-2060) Mt. Hood Glaciers Historic & Future Temperature Historic Future Projected Temperature Increase 2.3 F (range of 1.7 F - 3.0 F) Projected Precipitation Increase 2.4 % (range of -2.8% - 4.7%)
Streamflow (average) 1,600 Hood River At Tucker Bridge, Monthly Mean Flows 1,400 1,200 Historic Future Flow (cfs) 1,000 800 600 400 200 ~55 cfs less 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Streamflow 180 East Fork Above Middle Fork, Monthly Mean Flows Flow (cfs) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ~30 cfs less June July Aug Sept
Options to Increase Water Availability Using more Groundwater (currently evaluating potential impact & recharge possibilities) Increasing Reservoir Storage Potable Water Conservation (comparatively low impact) Irrigation Water Conservation conveyance, on-farm, fallowing of annual crops Hydropower- reduce summer diversions, off-set with winter diversions
Water Conservation - Irrigation Impact sprinklers on handline Solid set micro sprinkler Open canal New pipe project
Water Conservation Irrigation Potential Water Savings (cfs) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Sprinkler / Soil Moisture Sensor Pipe / Operational DID EFID FID MFID MHID
Average Crop Demand (AgriMet) April - September Crop Demand (inches) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 ~6 growing season precipitation Irrigation demand of 16-20 0 Alfalfa Pasture Lawn Apples Pears Cherries Wine Grapes Blueberries
Water Use of Different Application Methods 40 Typical Application per Year (inches/season) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Wheel line Impact Rotator Drip 11 36 range
Effects of Sub-optimal Irrigation Practices Poor crop performance due to insufficient or uneven application of water (Ex. application rate exceeds absorption rate of soil, some trees get too much, some not enough) Leaching fertilizer out of root zone; washes into ground water or surface water- waste of money Surface runoff leads to soil erosion on slopes Higher labor cost
Benefits of Improved Irrigation Practices Optimize fruit yield and quality (reduce incidence of cork spot & alfalfa greening in pears) Optimize canopy development and efficiency: avoid excessive shade, promote return bloom & fruit set Optimize inputs & minimize costs (nitrogen, water, pruning) Ability to adequately water in a low-water year- maintain fruit size and profit margin
Improving Irrigation Management Design and maintain irrigation systems for uniform and efficient watering Use soil moisture monitoring and evapotranspiration estimates to optimize water availability to crops (Match irrigation application to crop demand)
Future Management Scenarios under Median Climate Change Historic : Reflects current management practices, infrastructure, and average stream flows (1980-2010) Future : Climate change but no management, infrastructural, or demand changes Increased Demand : Climate change + increased demand Increased Conservation : Climate change + increased demand + increased conservation Increase Storage : Climate change + increased demand + increased conservation + increased storage
Impacts from Alternatives in an Average Year 600 East Fork Above Middle Fork, Monthly Mean Flows 500 400 Flow (cfs) 300 200 100 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Impacts from Alternatives in an Average Year Flow (cfs) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 East Fork Above Middle Fork, Monthly Mean Flows June July Aug Sept
Improved Fish Habitat 14,000 East Fork Chinook Spawning 12,000 Amount of Habitat 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 35 65 0 50 100 150 200 Streamflow (cfs)
Historic/Existing (WY 1980-2010)
No Change in Water Use or Conservation (WY 2031-2060)
Conservation (WY 2031-2060)
Conservation & Storage (WY 2031-2060)
Basin Water Conservation Potential Actions On-farm irrigation: sprinkler upgrades, soil moisture monitoring Conveyance system upgrades (main & distribution lines) Expanded water storage in existing reservoirs Total Potential Savings Most likely in next 20 years Cost per CFS Next 20 years cost 32 cfs 26 cfs $ 0.4 M/cfs $10.4 million 27 cfs 27 cfs $ 1 1.3 M/cfs 4 cfs 4 cfs $0.2-0.6 M/cfs New water storage 22 cfs $1.4 M/cfs $35 million ~$2.4 million Hydropower rebalancing 13 cfs (varies) 13 cfs $0 $0 Voluntary fallowing of annual crops/pastures (Waterbank) Up to 17 cfs 8 cfs $50 K/cfs (dry years) $400,000/yr (dry years) 115 cfs 76 cfs $47.8 million*
Next Steps Continue to Explore Innovative Ways to Increase Water Availability Water Bank- mechanism for temporary leasing of water rights Shallow Ground Water Recharge-need to conduct feasibility study Fund Raising State & Regional funding sources: 4 local irrigation districts recently applied for approximately $7 million from OWRD for distribution piping & reservoir expansion Environmental Quality Incentives Program (NRCS): federal $ can cover 50% of on-farm irrigation upgrades; OWEB small grants Local sources? (Example- MFID has a cost-share program)