The Guanabara Bay Report Card. Bill Dennison 29 April 2016

Similar documents
2017 REPORT CARD. An annual reflection on social impacts, ecological outcomes, and partner engagement NETWORK INTEGRATION & APPLICATION

Chesapeake Bay. report card

2012 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

Building And Sustaining Integrated Networks: BASIN

Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2016

Coastal Bays. report card. Modeling nutrients, assessing climate vulnerabilities, and promoting environmental justice

Conservation Authority Watershed Report Cards and the Chesapeake Bay Experience. December 2, 2013 SOSMART

Redesign of Chesapeake Bay Program indicator structure and communication strategy: Goals, rationale and Products

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

the ability to manage for a stable and among the jurisdictions, and productive crab population and fishery by implement accountable monitoring

Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2017

Assessing the ecological and human health status of Baltimore's Inner Harbor

Strategic Plan. artnership for the Delaware Estuary. Funding Support Provided by the William Penn Foundation

2008 at a glance. Indicators used in the report card. Total nitrogen. Coastal Bays health ranged from poor to good among reporting regions

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

Coastal Bays. report card. Gold stars for partnerships. Black skimmers are dependent on island habit in the Coastal Bays

Coastal Bays. report card. Gold stars for partnerships

Chesapeake Bay Restora/on Effort

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNTDATION (NFWF) PHASE I

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

Upper Mississippi River Conference 2016 Action Agenda: Raise the Grade

Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Challenges & Opportunities

Linking Ecosystem Indicators to Ecosystem Services

Chapter 4.4. Development of a Water Quality Index for the Maryland Coastal Bays

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

Technical Cooperation Project: Overview of the Environmental State of Guanabara Bay Robert Summers April 29 th, 2016

Slide 1: Welcome to today s The Nitrogen Cycle presentation, where we ll be talking to you about the importance of nitrogen in our environment.

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

Chesapeake Bay Updates. Agricultural Advisory Board June 18, 2014 Andy Zemba Interstate Waters Office

Dead-Zones and Coastal Eutrophication: Case- Study of Chesapeake Bay W. M. Kemp University of Maryland CES Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge, MD

Ecosystem Health Report Card a tool for monitoring nutrient and health of coastal ecosystem ; Chilika lake - a case study.

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

Water Quality Monitoring:

Coastal Bays. report card. The Maryland Coastal Bays Program. Acknowledgements

Achieving Management and Conservation Goals through the Application of Ecosystem-based Management on the Central Coast of California

BACKGROUND. David Everett

Improved health of Chesapeake Bay in 2009

TAMAR ESTUARY 2011 REPORT CARD ECOSYSTEM HEALTH ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. Working together for healthy waterways

Lake Prespa Restoration Programme Challenges, Strategy and Achievements

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017

Indicator Framework SUPPORTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM INTO THE FUTURE. Management Board Meeting September 30, 2015

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

A Vision for a Healthy, Productive, and Sustainable Galveston Bay

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Restoration:

Resource Significance CAMIE KNOLLENBERG 02 FEB 2017 PCOP WEBINAR

Dead Zones for Dinner

Healthy Waterways: Healthy Catchments. South East Queensland, Australia

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment SWOT Analysis Summary from June 2014 Working Group Session v.2

Norwalk Harbor Report Card

Gulf of Mexico Program

The Development Process and Methods for the Guanabara Bay Report Card

Findings of the IJC Nearshore Workshops

Quantifying Ecosystem Services of Restored Oyster Reefs

Nutrient Management Strategy for the International Red River Watershed. Collaborating Across Jurisdictions to Improve Water Quality

Setting the Context: Ecosystem Service Analysis

Is This a Healthy Body of Water?

Chesapeake Bay Strategy Goals Framework

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Organizing Science in Large Scale River Restoration Programs

LME 06 Southeast U.S. Continental Shelf

Fishing and Boating: Past, Present, and Restoration Thoughts

6 TH. Most of the Earth Is Covered with Water (2) Most Aquatic Species Live in Top, Middle, or Bottom Layers of Water (1)

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2017 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

The Choice is Ours... Let s choose clean water

Coastal Ecosystems: Saving Chesapeake Bay. Note the highest pigment concentrations (red) in coastal regions, especially estuaries

LEE COUNTY WATER QUALITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) UPDATE

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Fish Habitat Outcome Management Strategy , v.1

Marine Cumulative Effects

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

BAY BAROMETER. Health and Restoration. in the Chesapeake Watershed

Ocean Pollution. Ocean Pollution

Application of the Montreal Process Criteria & Indicators at National and Sub-national Scales

Valuing nature s benefits for humans

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

OCEAN POLLUTION. Pollution of coastal waters near heavily populated areas is a serious problem.

What s In Our Water Lesson Plan

APPENDIX A. Nutrient Trading Criteria Specific for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Quarterly Progress Meeting: Blue Crab

STAC Workshop: Understanding and Explaining 30+ Years of Water Clarity Trends In the Bay s Tidal Waters. February 6-7 th, 2017

Habitat Conservation and Fisheries

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

ITAT Workshop on Integrating Findings to Explain Water Quality Change

FY2016 GIT Funding Process. Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting February 28, 2017

The Rouge River Fisheries Management Plan

Fisheries and Aquaculture in a Changing Climate

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Transcription:

The Guanabara Bay Report Card Bill Dennison 29 April 2016

university of Maryland Center for environmental science and the integration and application Network UMCES formed in 1925 to provide practical environmental advice UMCES defines scholarship as discovery, integration, application, and teaching IAN was created in 2002 to address integration and application

Who are we? IAN s aim is to enable better communication to empower change.

IAN has three main focus areas Develop Science Communication products Environmental Report Cards Science Communication Training

Solving, not just studying environmental problems STUDY Dispassionate Embrace complexity Publish & funding via peer review Getting it right SOLVE Passionate Simplify Publish & funding via stakeholders Getting it done

Synthesizing information for less technical audiences Synthesis Visualization Context Synthesized data Illustrate key points So what?

What is an ecosystem health Broad-level assessments of a region or system Communicate complex information Based on real data: transparent and defendable Provide accountability Engage communities report card?

Ecosystem health report cards are an effective communication tool Peer pressure is a powerful human motivator Educational report cards are a common experience Report cards synthesize large amounts of data

outcomes of ecosystem health report cards Well received and influential Comprehensive package goes beyond simple grading Visually appealing Being local sense of ownership Educational

Report cards address many Top tier = Report card 2 nd Tier = Newsletter, website 3 rd Tier = Technical reports, scientific literature Base = Data audiences

We have developed report cards in iconic regions around the world

Report cards are a five step process

We use a partnership approach and want to engage you in this process

Conceptual mapping exercise

Initial Conceptual maps

Guanabara Bay key values & major threats

Reporting region discussion

Reporting regions: Guanabara Bay & river basin 2 3 1 6 5 4

Potential indicators for guanabara bay

Potential indicators for the guanabara bay Basin Dissolved oxygen Biological oxygen demand Total phosphorus Turbidity Total dissolved solids Air/water temperature Nitrate Coliforms ph

Initial workshop newsletter will be discussed after lunch Globally iconic locaaon Pressing environmental problems Need for scienafically rigorous, transparent assessments to track restoraaon progress

We will produce a printed report card for guanabara bay (like chesapeake bay)

we also will add the guanabara bay report card to ecoreportcard.org

the website allows people to investigate the data

the website provides detailed explanations

the website provides the methodology

guanabara bay report card home page example guanabara- bay/ How healthy is your Guanabara Bay?

guanabara bay report card

Guanabara Bay basin report card

guanabara bay basin report card example Guapimirim- Macacu Basin Coliform: Dissolved oxygen: Nitrate: Overall Score:?

Guanabara Bay is an amazing place BeauAful natural harbor It alracts people to live, work, and play

Guanabara Bay is vulnerable to human impact Restricted exchange with ocean Poor flushing where it is needed most

guanabara bay has some significant environmental impacts Visible (e.g. liler) Invisible (e.g. bacterial contaminaaon)

There is strong interest in improving Guanabara Bay (This is why we are all here today)

We have a unique opportunity to accelerate Guanabara Bay restoration

There is a strong scientific foundation for Guanabara Bay research and monitoring

We can build on this foundation to create a scientifically rigorous, transparent process for tracking restoration progress guanabara- bay/ How healthy is your Guanabara Bay?

We look forward to engaging with you in this process

Thank you

Developing a variety of science communication products Newsletters Science Journals Posters Reports Books

Report Card Examples

Report cards are a five step process

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Workshop to idenafy values and threats Brings together relevant experts and stakeholders in one place at one Ame Together develop content and structure of report card Builds consensus amongst different paraes IteraAve review and ediang during and aver workshop

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Chesapeake Bay Build conceptual diagrams

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Chesapeake Bay Indicators measure values and threats

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results The method of assigning thresholds for each indicator can be based on either, or a combinaaon, of the following: Regulatory guidelines (e.g. local or regional water quality guidelines); Biological limits (e.g. dissolved oxygen requirements for protecaon of an important species); Socio/economic requirements (e.g. minimal fish stocks determined to be required for sustainable fishery); Reference condiaons (e.g. historical baseline or nearby system with condiaons that would like to be matched); Professional judgment

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Score CalculaAon Methods 1. Prepare Data : Calculate annual mean, median (or mula- year rolling mean or median) for each indicator 2. Assess data against thresholds % of measured or interpolated area that meets or does not meet threshold OR % of sites that meets or does not meet threshold

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Chesapeake Bay Methods Water quality BioAc Data integrated Compared to thresholds Combined into indices

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Score 80-100 % 60-80 % Grade ExplanaAon A B All water quality and biological health indicators meet desired levels. Most water quality and biological health indicators meet desired levels. 40-60 % 20-40 % 0-20 % C D F There is a mix of good and poor levels of water quality and biological health indicators. Some or few water quality and biological health indicators meet desired levels. Very few or no water quality and biological health indicators meet desired levels.

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Cover Values and threats Indicators and methods Scores/ Grades Trends Credits

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Keep evolving Chesapeake Bay: has new indicators is now reporang trends Includes flow weighted scores

RetrospecAve on A ecosystem report cards B C D F Chesapeake Bay, USA 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Moreton Bay report A card B C D Gradual change ReAcence to change/sunset indicators Delay in reporang GraduaAon? F Moreton Bay, Australia 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

In summary: 1 IdenJfy values and threats 2 Choose indicators 3 IdenJfy thresholds 4 Calculate scores and grades 5 Communicate results

Mississippi River Watershed Report Card

Mississippi River Report Card

Laguna De Bay Report Card

Great Barrier Reef Report Card EvoluAon of report cards to include pressure and response indicators

Chilika Lake Report Card

Gulf of Mexico Report Card DPSSIR framework MulAnaAonal effort

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Chesapeake Bay (Chesapeake 2000 Agreement) Values to protect Fisheries (fish, oysters and crabs) Recrea5on Tourism Threats Sewage Urban and agricultural runoff Overfishing Loss of habitat

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Report card indicators elsewhere Report Card Indicators Chesapeake Bay Pre 2012 = BIBI, PIBI, aquaac grasses, DO, Chlorophyll, water clarity, Chilika Lake Current = BIBI, aquaac grasses, DO, chlorophyll, water clarity, TN, TP, Blue Crabs, Bay Anchovy Water Quality = Chlorophyll, DO, water clarity, Biodiversity = Fisheries = Moreton Bay Bay = Rivers = Laguna de Bay???? Bird richness and abundance, dolphin abundance, benthic infauna diversity, total fish catch, fish diversity and fish size

1. Conceptual framework 2. Indicators 3. Thresholds 4. Calculate scores 5. Communicate results Chesapeake Bay Thresholds (can be seasonal and vary geographically)