Triethylaluminum from ethylene, aluminum and hydrogen [ ]

Similar documents
2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (MTHF)

alpha-methylstyrene as a byproduct of acetone and phenol production [ ]

Carbon fiber HS from PAN [UIDCarbFibHS]

Material Balances Design Project Manufacture of Diethyl Ether

GATE Solution 2000 to 2015 GATE SOLUTION to Detailed solution of each question CHEMICAL ENGINEERING GATE SOLUTION

Chemistry Resource Kit

Exercise 5. Simulation of HDA plant in UniSim

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics. Design Project. Production of Acetone

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics Design Project. Production of Ethanol

Design Project Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Styrene Manufacture

HYSYS WORKBOOK By: Eng. Ahmed Deyab Fares.

SO 2 Clean for SRU Expansion

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Ethylbenzene

Exercise 5. Simulation of HDA plant in UniSim

DISCLAIMER. Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Cumene

HIGH PUITY CARBON MONOXIDE FROM A FEED GAS ARNOLD KELLER AND RONALD SCHENDEL KINETICS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA

ECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION OF AN ETHYLBENZENE PROCESS. by Erin Leigh Dyer. Oxford May 2015

PRESENTATION OF NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS OF CONDENSATE TREATMENT

Lecture 4. Ammonia: Production and Storage - Part 1

ChE 455 Fall 2001 Major 1. Ethylene Oxide Production

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Spring Design Project. Production of Ethylene Oxide

INSIGHT OF OLEFIN COPOLYMER PROCESSES

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Formalin

Problems at the Cumene Production Facility, Unit 800

The project goal is to design a process capable of converting methane, obtained from remote

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics Fall Design Project. Production of Dimethyl Ether

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics. Design Project. Production of Ammonia

1. Process Description:

EBTAX: The Conversion of Ethane to Aromatics via Catalytic Conversion

Example SPC-2: Effect of Increasing Column P on a C3 splitter

Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Phthalic Anhydride

United States Patent (19)

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether

Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid to Tetrahydrofuran

Separations and Reaction Engineering Spring Design Project. Production of Acetone

Abstract PEP Review HEXENE PRODUCTION BY AXENS ALPHAHEXOL PROCESS By Girish Ballal (September 2012)

The methanol synthesis. Antal Tungler Emeritus professzor MTA Centre for Energy Research 2017

Information Centre Nitric Acid Plants. Kittiwake Procal Ltd Page 1 of 6

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Allyl Chloride

Overview of Distillation Techniques and Process in Recovery and Reuse of Volatile Liquids

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics Fall Design Project. Production of Drying Oil

Reduction of Sulphur in Superior Kerosene

Process description The Johnson Matthey/BP fixed-bed FT technology comprises a series of reaction vessels charged with a proprietary BP catalyst.

S.E. (Chemical) (First Semester) EXAMINATION, 2012 PROCESS CALCULATIONS (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

SSRG International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research ( SSRG IJCER ) Volume 5 Issue 2 May to Aug 2018

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, and Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Acrylic Acid

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Paraxylene from Corn. ScholarlyCommons. University of Pennsylvania. Antonio Barberio University of Pennsylvania

Michigan State University DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCE. ChE 321: Thermodynamics Spring 2017

GT-LPG Max SM. Maximizing LPG Recovery from Fuel Gas Using a Dividing Wall Column. Engineered to Innovate

Reforming Natural Gas for CO 2 pre-combustion capture in Combined Cycle power plant

Separations and Reactors. Acrylic Acid Production via the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Propylene

Reactors and Separations Design Project. Phthalic Anhydride Production

PEP Review METHANOL PRODUCTION VIA TOYO PROCESS By Syed N. Naqvi (December 2011) ABSTRACT

Inventors: Paul L. Micheli Mark C. Williams Edward L. Parsons

Effluent Treatment Using Evaporation and Crystallisation Technology

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

Chapter 5: Thermodynamic Processes and Cycles

Heat Integration of an Oxy-Combustion Process for Coal- Fired Power Plants with CO 2 Capture by Pinch Analysis

New Terephthalic Acid Process

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Sandra Heimel a *, Cliff Lowe a

Waste Generation and Release Estimation from Chemical Processes - Chapter 8.3. David R. Shonnard Department of Chemical Engineering

CO 2 RECOVERY FROM CO 2 REMOVAL UNIT AT GL1Z PLANT

DAVID BRENNAN SUSTAINABLE PROCESS ENGINEERING CONCEPTS, STRATEGIES, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION. Pan Stanford. Publishing

Written Exam 02 March Problems - Time: 2 hours PLEASE NOTICE

Green is Seen in Fertilizers Municipal Solid Waste Management. Carrie Farberow Kevin Bailey University of Oklahoma May 1, 2007

- 2 - SME Q1. (a) Briefly explain how the following methods used in a gas-turbine power plant increase the thermal efficiency:

The STEX Process-Extraction of Styrene from Pyrolysis Gasoline*

Topsøe Methanol Technology for Coal Based Plants

Material Balances. Design Project. Production of Phthalic Anhydride from o-xylene

Dynamics of Ethyl Benzene Synthesis Using Aspen Dynamics

PTAC PROCESS TECHNOLOGY II - SYSTEMS. Last Reviewed: Page 1 of 10

Faculty of Petroleum & Renewable Energy Engineering. Engineering. Sem 2 (2013/14) Faculty of Petroleum & Renewable Energy Engineering.

Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics Design Project. Production of Styrene

PROCESS DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION: ANALYSIS OF AN ETHYLBENZENE PRODUCTION PLANT. by Butler VanVeckhoven

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

GTC TECHNOLOGY. GT-UWC SM How a Uniting Wall Column Maximizes LPG Recovery. Engineered to Innovate WHITE PAPER

3.17. PROCESS INTEGRATION AND PINCH TECHNOLOGY

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Ammonia Production

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Maleic Anhydride

ENERGY SAVING IN CRYOGENIC AIR SEPARATION PROCESS APPLYING SELF HEAT RECUPERATION TECHNOLOGY

Corn to Ethanol Plant

PILLER INDUSTRIAL HEAT PUMP WE ARE WORKING ON THERMAL ENERGY

Nuclear-Power Ammonia Production

Techno-Economic Analysis for Ethylene and Oxygenates Products from the Oxidative Coupling of Methane Process

WWT Two-Stage Sour Water Stripping

PLANT DESIGN AND ECONOMICS

Item Hydrogen Gas Plant

by: Steven M. Puricelli and Ernesto Vera-Castaneda MECS, Inc USA

Chapter 10. Flowsheet Analysis for Pollution Prevention. by Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot and David T. Allen

Control Valve Sourcebook Chemical Process Overview

Mathematical Model and System Identification to Optimize Inputs Conditions for Plant Design of Cyclohexane

Reboiler heat energy recovery using integration process industries to increase their efficiency

MTBE Production. Process Description. Possibility of Changing Process Feed Conditions

Methane Emission Reductions in Oil and Gas Processing

Aspen Plus Process Model for Production of Gaseous Hydrogen via Steam Gasification of Bagasse

Analysis of Exergy and Energy of Gasifier Systems for Coal-to-Fuel

Transcription:

Reviewed by Michael Overcash 11-7-16 Rereviewed by Michael Overcash 11-10-16 Rereviewed by Michael Overcash 11-10-16 Final Triethylaluminum from ethylene, aluminum and hydrogen [97-93-8] CONTENTS OF FACTORY GATE TO FACTORY GATE LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY SUMMARY Chemistry... 2 Process Summary... 3 Summary of LCI Information... 5 Process Diagram Interpretation Sheet... 6 Process Diagram or Boundary of LCI... 7 Mass Balance of Chemicals in Each Process Stream... 8 Graph of Cumulative Chemical Losses through Manufacturing Process...11 Graph of Cumulative Contaminated Water Use / Emission through Manufacturing Process...12 Graph of Cumulative Non-Contaminated Water Use / Emission through Manufacturing Process...13 Energy Input for each Unit Process, Cumulative Energy Requirements, Cooling Requirements (exotherms), and Assumed Heat Recovery from Hot Streams Receiving Cooling...14 Graph of Cumulative Energy Requirements...15 Authors Peer reviews, name (date) Gtg report last modified on 11-10-2016 Additional notes Checked for database consistency on 11-10-2016 First gtg version finalized on 11-10-2016 Modification history, Author (date) EMV (11-10-2016) E. Vozzola Reviewed by MR Overcash on 11-10-2016: route, stoichiometry, and calculations reviewed and found to be representative. Products Standard inputs triethylaluminum Ethylene, Hydrogen, Aluminum Methodology: Environmental Clarity gtg lci reports are based on industrial practice information, standard methods of engineering process design, and technical reviews. These reports are intended to be representative of industrial production based on the stated route. Terms of use: Environmental Clarity does not assume any liability due to use of these lci data. Integration of these data with lci data based on other methodologies is the responsibility of the user. Each report may be updated to improve model accuracy or representativeness. Users of this report should cite: E. Griffing and M. Overcash, Chemical Life Cycle Database, www.environmentalclarity.com, 1999 - present. updated on 11/10/2016 1

Chemistry Primary reaction: 2 Al + 3 H 2 + 4 (C 2 H 5 ) 3 Al 6 (C 2 H 5 ) 2 AlH (1) 2 + 3 + 4 6 aluminum + hydrogen + triethylaluminum diethylaluminum hydride 6 (C 2 H 5 ) 2 AlH + 6 C 2 H 4 6 (C 2 H 5 ) 3 Al (2) + diethylaluminum hydride + ethylene triethylaluminum Net reaction: 2 Al + 3 H 2 + 6 C 2 H 4 2 (C 2 H 5 ) 3 Al (3) 2 + 3 + 6 2 aluminum + hydrogen + ethylene triethylaluminum updated on 11/10/2016 2

Process Summary Literature Triethylaluminum [97-93-8] is an organoaluminum compound. It is a colorless liquid that requires careful handling because it is highly pyrophoric, igniting immediately upon exposure to air or water. Triethylaluminum is often prepared and immediately used in the same chemical plant to prevent exposure to air and water. Alternatively, it can be stored in a stainless steel container under an inert atmosphere as a pure liquid or in solution with a hydrocarbon solvent. Triethylaluminum is used as a catalyst or intermediate in the production of polyethylene, polypropylene, and medium chain alcohols. Triethylaluminum exists almost entirely as a dimer in solution, with the molecular formula expressed as 2 Al(C 2 H 5 ) 3, [Al(C 2 H 5 ) 3 ] 2, or C 12 H 30 Al 2. Physical properties in the literature are typically given for the monomer Al(C 2 H 5 ) 3, thus in this gate-to-gate life cycle inventory (gtg lci) the physical properties are given on a monomer basis. Triethylaluminum is prepared from aluminum, hydrogen, and ethylene in a one or two-step process (Kirk Othmer, 2000). Many embodiments of the reaction are given in the encyclopedia, patent, and journal literature. The two-step process favors higher yields and is thus the preferred method (US 3,373,179; US 3,960,912). The process shown in this gtg lci is based on a two-step process described in detail by Ullmann s (2000). In the first step, a slurry is prepared containing 7 wt % aluminum powder, 45 wt % recycled triethylaluminum, and 52 wt % paraffin hydrocarbon solvent (b. p. 177-260 C). The slurry is pumped into a reactor operating at 132 C. A zirconium catalyst is used at 0.1 wt %. Hydrogen is introduced at the bottom of the reactor to maintain a partial pressure of about 100 atm (10 MPa). The exit stream from this reactor contains 83 wt % diethylaluminum hydride and is fed to a second reactor operating at 85 C and 30 atm (3 MPa). Sufficient ethylene is added to this reactor to completely react with the diethylaluminum hydride. Excess ethylene and hydrogen are removed in flash drums, and pure diethylaluminum is recovered from the solvent by distillation. LCI design Aluminum at 25 C and 1 atm is mixed with recycled triethylaluminum and dodecane solvent to form a slurry (5 wt % Al, 45% triethylaluminum, 50% solvent). The slurry temperature is 98 C and 1 atm. The slurry is pumped to 100 atm and fed to a continuous rector. Hydrogen gas at 25 C and 17 atm is compressed to 100 atm and also fed to the reactor. The reaction conditions are 132 C and 100 atm. Triethylaluminum reacts with aluminum to form diethyl aluminum hydride. The reactor effluent is depressurized to 30 atm in a gas/liquid separator. Hydrogen gas from the separator is cooled to 25 C and sent as a waste. The liquid stream from the separator is fed to a second reactor operating at 85 C and 5 atm. Ethylene at 25 C is compressed to 5 atm and also fed to the reactor. Diethylaluminum hydride and ethylene react to form triethylaluminum. The reactor effluent is depressurized to 1 atm in a gas/liquid separator. Ethylene gas from the separator is sent as a waste. The liquid stream from the separator contains triethylaluminum in dodecane solvent. About 70% of this stream is recycled to the slurry mixer. The remaining 30% is distilled to remove triethylaluminum at 193 C and 1 atm. The distillation bottoms contain dodecane solvent and are recycled to the slurry mixer. The distillation overhead contains pure triethylaluminum, This stream is cooled to 25 C and sent as the main product. References Kirk Othmer (2000) Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Alcohols, Higher Aliphatic, Synthetic Processes (J. D. Wagner, G. R. Lappin, J. R. Zietz, article authors) Ullmann's (2000) Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Aluminum Compounds, Organic (M. J. Krause, F. Orlandi, A. T. Saurage, J. R. Zietz, article authors) US 3,373,179 (1968) Method for the manufacture of dialkyl aluminum hydride compounds (A. L. Lewis, inventor ; Continental Oil Company, assignee) US 3,960,912 (1976) Process for the preparation of trialkyl aluminum compounds (K. H. Mueller, H.-J. Hubert, inventors; Schering Aktiengesellschaft, assignee) updated on 11/10/2016 3

Conversion / yield data, molar percentage basis, data used in gtg design Basis Conversion of or Yield from Conversion of or Yield from aluminum hydrogen ethylene Process conversion in reactor 1: reactant into process 100 95.2 N/A % of reactant entering the process that reacts Per pass conversion in reactor 1: reactant into reactor 100 95.2 N/A % of reactant entering the reactor that per pass reacts Yield of reactor 1: % yield produced in the reactor based on reactant input to process Total conversion in reactor 2: % of reactant entering the process that reacts Total per pass conversion in reactor 2: % of reactant entering the reactor that reacts Total yield of reactor 2: % yield produced in the reactor based on reactant input to process Total yield of Process: % yield produced by the overall process based on reactant input to process reactant into process or produced in other reactor Notes: Product purity triethylaluminum Used here 100% Comments 100 100 N/A N/A N/A 95.2 N/A N/A 95.2 N/A N/A 100 100 95 95 Conversion of Or Yield from updated on 11/10/2016 4

Summary of LCI Information Standard inputs UID Name Flow Purity Units Comments 74-85-1 Ethylene 778 - [kg/hr] 1333-74-0 Hydrogen 27.8 - [kg/hr] 7429-90-5 Aluminum 237 - [kg/hr] Total 1042 [kg/hr] Non-reacting inputs UID Name Flow Purity Units Comments Total 0 [kg/hr] Ancillary inputs UID Name Flow Purity Units Comments Total 0 [kg/hr] Products UID Name Flow Purity Units Comments 97-93-8 triethylaluminum 1000 100 [kg/hr] Total 1000 [kg/hr] Benign outflows UID Name Flow Purity Units Comments Total 0 [kg/hr] Process emissions UID Name Gas Liquid Solid Solvent Units Comments 1333-74-0 Hydrogen 1.45 0 0 0 [kg/hr] 74-85-1 Ethylene 40.7 0 0 0 [kg/hr] Total 42.2 0 0 0 Mass balance Total inputs 1042 Total outflows 1042 Net input 2.24E-04 Energy use Energy type Amount Units Comments electricity 382 [MJ/hr] Net electricity use at plant heating steam 2293 [MJ/hr] heating by steam (0.85 efficiency included) Net input requirement 2675 [MJ/hr] Net of energies input to system cooling water -5072 [MJ/hr] net cooling by cooling water potential recovery -1663 [MJ/hr] potential energy recovery (negative) Net energy 1011 [MJ/hr] Net input requirement - potential recovery updated on 11/10/2016 5

Process Diagram Interpretation Sheet 1) As much as possible, standard symbols are used for all unit processes. 2) Only overall input and output chemicals are labeled on these diagrams. All intermediate information is given on the attached Process Mass Balance sheet 3) The physical state of most streams is shown (gas, g; liquid, l; solid, s) 4) The process numbering is as follows, generally numbers progress from the start to the end of the process numbers are used for process streams C i, i = 1,..n are used for all cooling non-contact streams S j, j = 1,...n are used for all steam heating non-contact streams 5) Recycle streams are shown with dotted lines For most streams, the temperature and pressure are shown, if the pressures are greater than 1 atm updated on 11/10/2016 6

Process Diagram or Boundary of LCI Steam enters the process as a gas at 207 o C and leaves as a liquid at 207 o C. Cooling water enters at 20 o C and leaves at 50 o C. Unless otherwise indicated, all processes are at 1 atm and 25 o C. 19 (l) 85 o C 1 atm 1 (l) Input 237 kg Aluminum 25 o C 2 (l) 25 o C 1 atm 3 (g) Input 27.6 kg Hydrogen 25 o C 17.0 atm 16 (g) Waste 36.8 kg Ethylene 25 o C C7 Cnv 1 Cmp 1 HX 2 C8 MxE1 Mx 1 P1 20 (l) 98.3 o C 1 atm 4 (g) 224 o C 100 atm 15 (g) 85 o C 1 atm g/l separator C1 14 (l) 85 o C 5.0 atm 20a (l) 2500 kg triethylaluminum 2200 kg Dodecane 237 kg Aluminum 98.3 o C 100 atm R1 C2 P3 5 (l) 2263 kg diethylaluminum hydride 2200 kg Dodecane 500 kg triethylaluminum trace 132 o C 100 atm C5 P2 R2 13 (l) 3500 kg triethylaluminum 2200 kg Dodecane 36.8 kg Ethylene 85 o C 5.0 atm 6 (l) 132 o C 100 atm C6 10 (l) 132 o C 5.0 atm 12 (g) 126 o C 5.0 atm 7 (g) 132 o C 30.0 atm g/l separator LTrb 1 Cmp 2 C3 HX 1 9 (l) 2263 kg diethylaluminum hydride 2200 kg Dodecane 500 kg triethylaluminum 132 o C 30.0 atm 11 (g) Input 774 kg Ethylene 25 o C C4 Fugitive Losses (Total) (g) Waste 3.87 kg Ethylene 0.138 kg Hydrogen 8 (g) Waste 1.32 kg Hydrogen 25 o C P4 17 (l) 3500 kg triethylaluminum 2200 kg Dodecane 85 o C 18 (l) 2500 kg triethylaluminum 1571 kg Dodecane 85 o C C9 21 (l) 1000 kg triethylaluminum 629 kg Dodecane 85 o C P5 25 (l) 193 o C Di 1 1 atm 22 (l) 85 o C 1 atm 23 (l) 193 o C 1 atm S1 C10 S2 P7 26 (l) 193 o C 1 atm P6 C11 HX 3 27 (l) Main product 1000 kg total (excluding water). Stream comprised of: 1000 kg triethylaluminum 25 o C C12 24 (l) 629 kg Dodecane 193 o C updated on 11/10/2016 7

Comments Streams Temp [C] P Phase Total Flow Aluminum Hydrogen Ethylene diethylaluminum hydride triethylaluminum Dodecane Mass Balance of Chemicals in Each Process Stream All flow rates are given in kg / hr. Physical state of chemical losses: Gas, Liquid, Solid. Input 1 25.0 1.00 l 237 237 2 25.0 1.00 l 237 237 Input 3 25.0 17.0 g 27.6 27.6 4 224 100 g 27.6 27.6 Stream 20a:Recycle input 4937 237 2500 2200 Stream 20a:Recycle calculated 4937 237 0 0 0 2500 2200 Stream 20a:Recycle residue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R1 237 kg Aluminum : is converted in rxn ( 100 % of reactor input) Input to reactor : 4964 237 27.6 0 0 2500 2200 R1 Reaction Coefficient 1 : -2.00-3.00 6.00-4.00 R1 Conversion 1 [kg/hr] : 0-237 -26.3 2263-2000 R1 Conversion 1 [kgmol/hr] : 4.39-8.77-13.2 26.3-17.5 Flow out of reactor : 4964 0 1.32 0 2263 500 2200 Primary product : diethylaluminum hydride Total conversion : 100 95.2-0 NA NA NA Per pass conversion : 100 95.2 NA 80.0-0 Total yield from reactor : 100 100 NA 100.0 Display in PFD 5 132 100 l 4964 0 1.32 0 2263 500 2200 6 132 100 l 4964 0 1.32 0 2263 500 2200 7 132 30.0 g 1.32 1.32 Waste 8 25.0 1.00 g -1.32 0-1.32 0 0 0 0 Display in PFD 9 132 30.0 l 4963 0 0 0 2263 500 2200 10 132 5.00 l 4963 0 0 0 2263 500 2200 Input 11 25.0 1.00 g 774 774 12 126 5.00 g 774 774 R2 2263 kg diethylaluminum hydride : is converted in rxn ( 100 % of reactor input) Input to reactor : 5737 0 0 774 2263 500 2200 R2 Reaction Coefficient 1 : -1.00-1.00 1.00 R2 Conversion 1 [kg/hr] : 0-737 -2263 3000 R2 Conversion 1 [kgmol/hr] : 26.3-26.3-26.3 26.3 updated on 11/10/2016 8

Comments Streams Temp [C] P Phase Total Flow Aluminum Hydrogen Ethylene diethylaluminum hydride triethylaluminum Dodecane Flow out of reactor : 5737 0 0 36.8 0 3500 2200 Primary product : triethylaluminum Total conversion : -0-0 95.2 NA NA NA Per pass conversion : 95.2 100 NA -0 Total yield from reactor : 100 100 NA Display in PFD 13 85.0 5.00 l 5737 0 0 36.8 0 3500 2200 14 85.0 5.00 l 5737 0 0 36.8 0 3500 2200 15 85.0 1.00 g 36.8 36.8 Waste 16 25.0 1.00 g -36.8 0 0-36.8 0 0 0 Display in PFD 17 85.0 1.00 l 5700 0 0 0 0 3500 2200 Display in PFD 18 85.0 1.00 l 4071 0 0 0 0 2500 1571 19 85.0 1.00 l 4071 0 0 0 0 2500 1571 20 98.3 1.00 l 4937 237 0 0 0 2500 2200 Display in PFD 20a 98.3 100 l 4937 237 0 0 0 2500 2200 Display in PFD 21 85.0 1.00 l 1629 0 0 0 0 1000 629 Feed 22 85.0 1.00 l 1629 0 0 0 0 1000 629 Di <1> percentage of input in distillate : 0 100 100 0 100 0 percentage of input in bottoms : 100 0 0 100 0 100 Boiling Temperature (Tb) [oc] : 193 216 Distillate 25 193 1.00 l 1000 0 0 0 0 1000 0 Bottoms 23 193 1.00 l 629 0 0 0 0 0 629 Display in PFD 24 193 1.00 l 629 0 0 0 0 0 629 26 193 1.00 l 1000 0 0 0 0 1000 0 Main product 27 25.0 1.00 l -1000 0 0 0 0-1000 0 Product purity (%) : 100 Main product : triethylaluminum Overall Rxn coefficients : -2.00-3.00-6.00 2.00 Total yield of process (from reactant) : 100 94.8 94.8 NA Waste Fugitive Losses (Total) g -4.01 0-0.138-3.87 0 0 0 Input Sum : 1038 237 27.6 774 0 0 0 Replacement of fugitive emissions of reactants : 4.01 0 0.138 3.87 Total Input (Input + Fugitive Replacement) : 1042 237 27.8 778 0 0 0 Product Sum : 1000 0 0 0 0 1000 0 Main product flow : 1000 0 0 0 0 1000 0 Net Input (in - out, omitting fugitives) : 0 updated on 11/10/2016 9

Type Label Temp, C P, atm Phase Total flow Steam Water Input C1 20.0 1.00 l 1.37E+04 1.37E+04 Cooling out C2 50.0 1.00 l -1.37E+04-1.37E+04 Input C3 20.0 1.00 l 13.8 13.8 Cooling out C4 50.0 1.00 l -13.8-13.8 Input C5 20.0 1.00 l 7508 7508 Cooling out C6 50.0 1.00 l -7508-7508 Input C7 20.0 1.00 l 25.7 25.7 Cooling out C8 50.0 1.00 l -25.7-25.7 Input C9 20.0 1.00 l 1.07E+04 1.07E+04 Cooling out C10 50.0 1.00 l -1.07E+04-1.07E+04 Input C11 20.0 1.00 l 2385 2385 Cooling out C12 50.0 1.00 l -2385-2385 Input S1 207 1.00 l 1199 1199 Steam out S2 207 1.00 l -1199-1199 updated on 11/10/2016 10

Graph of Cumulative Chemical Losses through Manufacturing Process updated on 11/10/2016 11

Graph of Cumulative Contaminated Water Use / Emission through Manufacturing Process updated on 11/10/2016 12

Graph of Cumulative Non-Contaminated Water Use / Emission through Manufacturing Process updated on 11/10/2016 13

Process Diagram Label Unit Energy input [MJ / 1000 kg Product] Cumulative energy [MJ / 1000 kg Product] To [C] (Used to determine energy type) Energy Type Process diagram label Unit Energy Loss Cumulative cooling water energy Tef [C] (for recovery efficiency) Recovery Efficiency Energy Recovered Cumulative recovered [MJ / 1000 kg Product] Energy Input for each Unit Process, Cumulative Energy Requirements, Cooling Requirements (exotherms), and Assumed Heat Recovery from Hot Streams Receiving Cooling Energy Input [MJ / hr] Cooling Requirements [MJ / hr] Cnv1 Conveyer 1 0.0240 0.0240 E R1 Reactor 1-2029 -2029 132 0.250-507 -507 MxE1 Mixer electricity 1 4.40 4.42 E Hx1 Heat exchanger 1-2.04-2031 132 0.250-0.509-508 P1 Pump 1 101 105 E LTrb1 Liquid turbine 1-9.46-2031 1.00-9.46-517 Cmp1 Compressor 1 106 211 E R2 Reactor 2-1109 -3139 85.0 0.250-277 -794 P2 Pump 2 0.0401 211 E Hx2 Heat exchanger 2-3.79-3143 85.0 0.250-0.949-795 Cmp2 Compressor 2 171 381 E Di1 Distillation condenser 1-1577 -4720 192 0.450-709 -1505 P3 Pump 3 0.0673 381 E Hx3 Heat exchanger 3-352 -5072 193 0.450-158 -1663 P4 Pump 4 0.0263 381 E P5 Pump 5 2.16E-03 381 E Di1 Distillation reboiler 1 1949 2331 192 S P6 Pump 6 1.73E-04 2331 E P7 Pump 7 0.0693 2331 E Potential recovery -1663 668 Net energy 668 Potential recovery: -1663 Electricity 382 E [MJ/hr] Heating steam 1949 S [MJ/hr] Energy input requirement 2331 [MJ/hr] Cooling water -5072 [MJ/hr] Potential heat recovery -1663 [MJ/hr] Net energy 668 [MJ/hr] updated on 11/10/2016 14

Graph of Cumulative Energy Requirements updated on 11/10/2016 15