Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update

Similar documents
Collaborative Decision Making(CDM), Surface CDM

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) and Surface CDM (SCDM)

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM), Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM), and Surface CDM

CDM Road Show. Friends & Partners in Aviation Weather Vision Forum NBAA/NCAR. CDM Overview - Friends & Partners in Aviation Weather / Washington, D.C.

FAA/Industry Collaborative Weather Rerouting Workshop. TFM Focus Area Discussion Summaries April 10-11, 2001

The AIRPORT CDM. Bahrain October 2015

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Enhancing Airport Efficiency

Outbound Punctuality Sequencing by Collaborative Departure Planning

JPDO Paper. Guidance on the Evolution of NextGen from the Perspective of Airline and Flight Operations Centers. Paper No.: 2010: 016 July 28, 2010

Project 016 Airport Surface Movement Optimization

A-CDM Benefits & Network Impact Study

Linking Existing ON ground, ARrival and Departure Operations

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Potential Benefits of Operations

Manual on Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management

Delri Muller, Karen B. Marais, Payuna Uday (Purdue) R. John Hansman, Tom G. Reynolds, Jonathan Lovegren (MIT)

Improving Traffic Flow Optimization and Demand Management

Airport CDM: The Contribution of the XMAN Approach Dietmar Böhme

A 4D Flight Profile Server And Probability-Based 4D Weather Objects

SESAR The European ATM Improvement Programme. Regional ANC 2012 Preparatory Symposium Michael STANDAR Moscow March 2012

Collaborative Decision Making in Aviation

Federal Aviation Administration FPAW Weather Integration Into NextGen

THE ROADMAP FOR DELIVERING HIGH PERFORMING AVIATION FOR EUROPE. European ATM Master Plan

Federal Aviation Administration The NextGen Vision of Future Safety

Weatherproofing the NAS :

Local and network impact assessment of ACDM

International Civil Aviation Organization. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Saulo Da Silva

Meteorology in Collaborative Decision Making at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport

Terminal Flight Data Manager (TFDM) Environmental Impact Assessment

JPDO Systems Modeling and Analysis

Subject matter and scope

Performance Based Approach for ASBUs Implementation

ATFM: GETTING STARTED

Episode 3 D FTS on 4D trajectory management and complexity reduction - Experimental Plan EPISODE 3

Some Trends in Next Generation Air Traffic Management

Analysis of Multi-Sector Planner Concepts in U.S. Airspace

NAS-Wide Performance: Impact of Select Uncertainty Factors and Implications for Experimental Design

ICAT MIT. Increase Milestone Prediction Accuracy in. Potential Approaches to. NAS Movements. Georg Theis, Francis Carr, Professor JP Clarke

FAA Office of. Environment and Energy Operations Research Projects. Federal Aviation Administration

Single European Sky Interoperability Regulation

NextGen Implementation Plan An Update

Co-operative Air Traffic Management Airport Centered Planning

The 3 M s of ATM. Professor John-Paul Clarke Air Transportation Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology

SESAR development and deployment

INTERNATIONAL VOLCANIC ASH TASK FORCE (IVATF)

The Network Strategy Plan. Brian Flynn

A CDM Standard to Guide Implementation in Europe

NCLB AIM Workshop Cairo,11-13 September 2017 SWIM. IATA s Perspective

User Forum Evolution of Network Management Operation Center NMOC. Lenti Giovanni. Head of NOS 24 January 2013

The SESAR Joint Undertaking is a EU body created by the EU Council (REG 219/2007)

SUPPORTING GLOBAL HARMONISATION AND. Michael Standar, SESAR JU Chief Strategy & External Affairs

Environmental Issues and application of corresponding Models in the context of Total Airport Management. October, 29 th 2009 CEAS 2009 Manchester, UK

Commission hearing on the preparation for RP3

EUROCONTROL Advanced ATC TWR Implementation Guide

SESAR: a European initiative for an enhanced ATM system

SESAR & NextGen Working together for Aviation Interoperability

Near Term Operational Changes FAA PARTNER Project 32

THE FUTURE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SAFE & EFFICIENT. An Update on SESAR. Prof. Dr. Peter Hecker Member of the Scientific Committee

NextGen ATM Concept of Operations: ASAS-Reliant

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

Transforming Risk Management

EPISODE 3. Episode 3 paves the way for SESAR validation

Visual Guidance. Research and Development. By: Holly Cyrus, Project Manager Date: August 23, Federal Aviation Administration

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT MANDATE TO CEN/CENELEC/ETSI FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF

Global Air Navigation System Performance Based Air Navigation Performance Framework

AIRCRAFT JOURNEY 00 THROUGHOUT THE JOURNEY NEXTT AIRCRAFT SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

SESAR Overview. WAKENET3 Europe Workshop. Paul Adamson SJU Programme Manager (WP6/12)

Implementation of the Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) Monitoring the ATFM implementation in the Peruvian State. (Presented by Peru) SUMMARY

Literature Review. HALA!-PhD Management Plan. Deliverable D4. February 2012 HALA! RESEARCH NETWORK

Guidance for Modeling Noise for Non-Standard Aircraft Profiles

A SYSTEM APPROACH Is the Solution. Steve Vail

Air Traffic Management Capacity-Driven Operational Concept Through 2015

Enabling Information Sharing through Common Services

Manual on Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management

A System Concept for Facilitating User Preferences in En Route Airspace

Parking Control System for Automated Gate Management

Goals and Standards The ICAO Perspective

Total Airport Management Suite

Controller and Pilot Evaluation of a Datalink-Enabled Trajectory-Based. Eric Mueller

FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE) Research Overview

The passenger within Performance Based Airport Operations. META CDM Gunnar Spies

Collaborative Decision Making Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport

CDM and JPDO NextGen Weather Public Meeting

Integration of the Airport with the Network Impact on Operational Communications & Procedure between CDM Airport & NMOC

Flight Path 2050: 90% of travelers within Europe are able to complete their journey, door to door within 4 hours

Better pricing for ATM?

SATCAS Standard Air Traffic Control Automation System

Master Plan edition 2

SESAR PJ09 DCB

The Use of Enterprise Architecture to Support the Development of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)

TRAFFIC REPORT. Traffic results January 2018 JANUARY Total aircraft movements (commercial + non commercial) 30, % 30,491 2.

Usability Evaluation of the Spot and Runway Departure Advisor (SARDA) Concept in a Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Tower Simulation

Work Package Final Report

Preparing an initial Assessment of the SESAR Concept of Operations EP3: Single European Sky Implementation Support through Validation

Civil-military ATM performance based partnership

Press release from Siemens, Barco, Inform, ATRiCS, DLR and Stuttgart Airport

CLT. Charlotte Douglas International Airport. Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Overview

Brownian Motion Delay Model for the Integration of Multiple Traffic Management Initiatives

HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP EVALUATION OF A MULTI-STRATEGY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT CAPABILITY

OJT INSTRUCTOR. Learning outcomes. Why study this course? Aim. ICAO Code 212

Transcription:

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update 1

FAA CDM Office CDM Domestic combined with International Operations, includes International Data Sharing One Manager Two Full Time Team Leads, Two Part-Time Two Staff Specialists One Executive Assistant NATCA CDM Representative 2

Global Collaboration ATCSCC/EuroControl; Action Plan 26 Collaborating with ICAO on a global ATFM manual; Chapter on CDM Working with various air navigation service providers (ANSP) to foster the concept of CDM International Telcons; Planning, Hurricane, Volcanic Ash, CDM Roadshows 3

CDM Working Group Structure Flow Evaluation Team (FET) FAA/NBAA Future Concept Team (FCT) FAA/DAL Weather Evaluation Team (WET) FAA/JBU Surface CDM Team (SCT) FAA/FDX CDM Training Team (CTT) FAA/AWE 4

Flow Evaluation Team Develop new Collaborative National Planning concepts (Automated) Future Applications of Required Time of Arrival/Control Time of Arrival 5

Weather Evaluation Team Developing and coordinating new weather forecasting products and procedures for Traffic Management 6

Future Concept Team Developing Phase I of Collaborative Airspace Constraint Resolution (CACR) 7

ICR - Integrated Collaborative Rerouting EARLY INTENT REQUIRED Future Concept Team LNK ORIGINAL IRW ABI 8

Select Best Route around FCA 9

NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes EWR1 EWR ROUTES EWR2 EWR3 EWR4 EWR5 EWR6 EWR7 EWR8 EWR9 10

NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes JFK1/TEB1 JFK/TEB ROUTES JFK2/TEB2 JFK3/TEB3 JFK4/TEB4 JFK5/TEB5 JFK6/TEB6 JFK7/TEB7 11

CTOP Concept SEVEN7 Collaborative Trajectory Options Program System Enhancements for Versatile Electronic Negotiation Prioritized Option List Constraint Definition User generates list of prioritized multiple options Automated messages Dynamic Flight list TFM-S manages data exchange TM monitors capacity and manages demand TBO - Trajectory Based Operations 12

CTOP CTOP SEVEN7 Concept System Collaborative Enhancements Trajectory for Versatile Options Electronic Program Negotiation Flow Constrained Area (FCA) Interactive Dynamic Flight List (IDFL) 13

TOS - Trajectory Options Set TOS for UAL234 60 mins ZKC_wx 60 mins Initial Filed trajectory RMNT: Route Minimum Notification Time required by the user to accept the given trajectory 14 RMNT = RMNT = 60 mins 10-19 mins delay, RMNT = RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 15 mins 10-19 mins delay, 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 15 mins 20-40 mins delay, ZKC_wx 20-40 mins delay, RMNT = 15 mins RMNT = 15 mins 20-40 mins delay 10-19 mins delay 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay Initial trajectory 20-40 mins delay 10-19 mins delay 0-9 mins delay RMNT = 60 mins 0-9 mins delay RMNT : Route Minimum Notification Time required by the user to accept the given trajectory

CTOP Collaborative Trajectory Options Program Scheduled Filed Active Delayed Re-routed More flights get rerouted and delayed (shown in white & yellow) 15

CTOP Collaborative Trajectory Options Program EXIT STRATEGY Scheduled Filed Active Delayed Re-routed Flights begin returning to their #1 option or original route (white & yellow routes reducing and more green routes appear) Demand through the ZKC FCA after capacity dial up to 80% 16

CACR Collaborative Airspace Constraint Resolution 1. Right Sizing the Constraint - Decision support: Where to draw the line? Where to set the dial? 17

Decision support : Where to set the dial? Framework for Weather Impacts in Decision Support Weather CIWS / CoSPA Precipitation & Echo Tops Forecasts Pilot Model: Probability of Deviation Translation Forecast Weather Avoidance Field (WAF) Operational Needs Performance Metrics RAPT Route / flow blockage Capacity impacts FCA Capacity Forecast Matrix Airspace Impact Forecasts Decision Support 18

2. Tactical Departure Constraint Resolution & Tactical Enroute Constraint Resolution Tactical Reroutes Less Than 45 MIN From Departure Tactical Airborne Reroutes Terminal En Route Terminal 19

Surface CDM Team Developing Requirements Document for sharing airport surface data Collaborating with EuroControl Airport- CDM Team to harmonize (where possible) Surface CDM Procedures 20

Surface CDM Team (SCT) Update Summary of Major CONOPS Changes Alignment with NextGen Implementation Plan (NGIP) & FAA Response to RTCA Task Force Recommendations Alignment with industry CONOPS-writing standards Development of Departure Reservoir Management (DRM) and Departure Metering Procedures (DMP) concepts Time-Based DMP (assignment of TMAT) Count-Based DMP (assignment of TMAC) Marshall Mowery, FAA Surface CDM Mark Hopkins, Delta Airlines 21

Foundational Surface CDM Capabilities & Procedures 1. Improve Individual and Shared Situational Awareness to Manage Departures. 2. Tactically Manage Surface Movement and Departure Queues 3. Improve Situational Awareness to Manage Arrival Traffic Flows 4. Improve Analysis and Measurement of Surface Operations 5. Global Harmonization 22

Goals of Surface CDM Establish a foundation for interoperability/global harmonization with other relevant Airport CDM programs Identify policy considerations for each of the core capabilities Align with the FAA s NextGen Solution Sets Flexible, transparent, quantifiable Understand the real demand at an airport Improve situational awareness Disseminate timely and accurate airport surface operations information among Stakeholders in a standardized format 23

Goals of Surface CDM Archive and store data for post-operational retrieval and analysis by all Stakeholders Identify measures and metrics which allow Stakeholders to measure the efficiency of the airport surface operation Improve predictability by continuously monitoring capacity and demand Improve NAS efficiency Effectively improve timeliness of flight operations Reduce the environmental impact of airport surface operations 24

Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS Key Similarities Use of information sharing guidelines & similar milestones approaches. Shared milestones include, but not limited to: Target off Block Time (TOBT) Actual off Block Time (AOBT) Actual Take off Time (ATOT) Estimated Landing Time (ELDT) Target Landing Time (TLDT) Actual Landing Time (ALDT) Establishment of Key Performance Areas and Indicators Collaborative pre-departure sequencing and management of flight updates Incorporation of variable taxi times into prediction/planning 25

Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS Key Differences Surface CDM CONOPS establishes the metering point at the transition between the non-movement and movement areas (spots), whereas Airport CDM establishes the control point at the gate/stand. Surface CDM does not adopt Airport CDM s Target Startup Approval Time (TSAT) turn-around milestone. Operators will determine startup time internally as necessary to adhere to established spot arrival times. Surface CDM equitably assigns departure opportunities to aircraft operators in the form of specific Target Movement area Entry Times (TMATs) or Target Movement area Entry Counts (TMACs), depending on which capacity allocation method best suits the needs of a particular operation. Within Surface CDM, the entity responsible for acting as the Departure Reservoir Coordinator (DRC) will be selected on an airport-by-airport basis, and may not necessarily be ATC/TFM. Surface CDM recognizes the FAA definition of taxi time as time in movement area, but also considers out-to-off performance. Airport-CDM defines taxi time as out-to-off. 26

-Culture Change -Runway and Taxiway Closures -New and Challenging Configurations -Airspace Constraints, Conflict with LGA - 7 Terminals, Cargo and General Aviation Terminals -145 Carriers, International and Domestic -Existing Tools, funding, bureaucratic process 27

28

Support customers with effective surface management in response to construction Maintain similar throughput Mitigate increase in delays Increase Safety Provide a better passenger experience 29

Promote Culture Change Exit First Come First Served Ration by Schedule through Equitable Allocation of Bucket Times Communicate and leverage strategic support from FAA Maximize surface efficiency by allocating bucket times based on true departure capacity for the configuration, first fix availability Enable more seamless configuration changes by reducing AOA congestion 30

31

JFK Performance with Metering Source: ASPM 2010 taxi out times were approximately 4 minutes less than in 2009 32

Gate Departure Delay Source: ASPM More gate delay in 2010 compared to 2009 33

Questions? 34