Labor Market Equilibrium

Similar documents
PUBLIC POWER = + + LOCAL CONTROL LOW RATES HIGH RELIABILITY

The Bee Informed Partnership Management Survey Results (2011) Respondent Profile. BeeInformed.org

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR SHRP2 R06C TECHNOLOGIES

Indiana Energy Status

Educating and Training Tomorrow s Workforce

Developing a Framework for Integrated Energy Network Planning

IPNI North American Soil Test Summaries. Tom Jensen, Director in North America Program Cell:

Laws are like. better not to see. made.

Analysis of NBI Data for California Bridges

The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI): An Infrastructure Model for Evaluating Tobacco Control Programs

Indiana Energy Landscape

HOW CAN WE MAKE MORE JOBS GOOD JOBS?

Loyalty Discounts and Pharmaceutical Competition

Construction & Materials Outlook. March 9, 2009 Ken Simonson, Chief Economist AGC of America USA

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Sierra Club National Survey on Coal, Climate and Carbon Pollution Key Findings

Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Program. American Association of Port Authorities 2013 Security Seminar July 17, 2013

OF PIPEDREAMS AND PIPELINES

2011 State Average Electricity Prices (cents/kwh)

Risk Mitigation Benefits of Energy Efficiency

A Comparison of In-Service Statistical Test Programs

Oil & The Economy: Boom-to-Bust and the Impact to States.

CPAs Making Sense of a Changing and Complex World. October 24, 2011 NASBA 104 th Annual Meeting Gregory J. Anton, CPA AICPA Chairman

State of the Network. EN2014 February 25, 2014

Watershed Plan Implementation in Oklahoma: What We Do and What We ve Learned

Destination for Education? Your Facility. Bring Us to You!

Mary. E. Torrence DVM, Ph.D., DACVPM National Program Leader, Food Safety

Farm Computer Usage and Ownership

The Future of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in North America

Potential Damage from Asian Longhorned Beetle

Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance (REBA): Accelerating GHG reductions through a buyer-led movement

Sarah Doll, Safer States BizNGO December 2014

Infrared Technology: Its Application and Benefit

Agricultural Land Values

Goal Setting: Nutrient Pollution Standards and Technology. October 29, Ephraim King OST

How to Submit Your Question

Land Values and Cash Rents: 2008 Summary

ISO s Data Management Roadmap. October 13, 2015

Advanced Fuel Cycles?

U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2014 U.S. Wind Industry First Quarter 2016 Market Report Market Report

MA Perspectives on Building Priorities for Climate and Energy Policy

Special Update: Salary Budget Survey

EPOXY INTEREST GROUP EPOXY-COATED REINFORCING STEEL IN PARKING GARAGES

Bank of the Sierra stays in the black with the help of Eaton UPS and service plan

Manufactured Housing In the United States

Rate Design: Basics and What s Possible

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income

Environmental Law and Railroads

Update on Energy Efficiency Opportunities in the Commonwealth

Bridge Management Questionnaire Report

Energy and Water: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Mike Hightower Water for Energy Project Lead Sandia National Laboratories

REGIONAL ENERGY BASELINES AND MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION PROTOCOLS

The #1 PHR/SPHR Certification Prep Tool

Report on the MLA Job Information List,

Topics. Examination of Time Lags in Automatic Refills Kolmogorov Smirnov Statistical Test

2005 AWPA Annual Meeting New Orleans, LA May Nelson G. Bingel III. Chair - ANSI O5 Principal - NESC

IDOT HMA Update. Christine M. Reed, P.E. Director Division of Highways Illinois Department of Transportation

Eaton CSE Earns Straight A s from Clarke College Keller Computer Center

2012 Election and Promotional Products Interaction

Tax Credit Trends and Overview: Turning HR Departments Into A Profit Center. December 8, 2016

Election Day Command Centers: The Vortex 2016 STATE CERTIFICATION TESTING OF VOTING SYSTEMS NATIONAL CONFERENCE MIT JUNE 20, 2016

Presidential Commission on Election Administration & Voter Registration. Future of California Elections Los Angeles, CA February 25,2016

U.S. HRW Wheat Crop Update

North Dakota Asphalt Conference April 6-7, 2010

Farm Production Expenditures Summary

American Wind Energy Association U.S. Wind Industry Second Quarter U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter Market Report Market Report

Facebook s Reach (on Reach) Miscalculations In The Age Of Precision

Future of the US Federal Highway Program

Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses

Assessing the Potential Economic and Distributional Impacts of a Tighter Ozone NAAQS

NUCLEAR BY THE NUMBERS A PRIL

FHWA SHRP2 Overview & National Perspective. Steve Cooper SHRP2 Renewal Pavement Engineer

NCHRP 20 68A U.S. Domestic Scan Program. Domestic Scan 13 03

Overview of USI Acquisition. March 2, 2018

Sierra Club National Survey on Coal, Climate and Carbon Pollution Key Findings

Farms and Land in Farms

CO 2 Emissions Profile of U.S. Cement Industry

Integrity Data Hub (IDH) Request for Information

Building Energy Codes Update NGA Energy Working Group

Organic Agriculture Funding & Priorities in the U.S.

EPA Carbon Regulations Stakeholder Meeting

The Future of Coal-fired Generation: Challenging the EPA

Consumer-Friendly and Environmentally-Sound Electricity

A New Market for Energy Regulation: Advancing the Clean Energy Revolution

1. Audited Media Platforms. Print Publication: Average Net Circulation: 15,536 (Print Edition)

The Discussion. WV s Observations Literature Review. SEAUPG Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA Thursday, November 19, 2015

SALARY SNAPSHOT: HIM PROFESSIONALS IN 2016

High Yield Systems: Role of Placement and Timing

Post Installation Inspection - Value Assurance. Stew Waller, P.E., LEED AP

THIS IS SUPERFUND. A Citizen s Guide to EPA s Superfund Program

Tack Coat Best Practices

NCHRP 20-68A US Domestic Scan Program

Maximizing the Value From Commercial Roof Systems. An Industry Report

Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets 101. Noah Bucon Senior Analyst, Policy & Certification Programs Center for Resource Solutions

Subcommittee on Maintenance Update. Des Moines, Iowa July 20, 2015

American Voting Experience: Voter Registration Modernization. Presidential Commission on Election Administration Ben Ginsburg & Bob Bauer Co-Chairs

Official Publication of The Tube & Pipe Association, Intl. In Print Online In Person

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management

Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Production Agriculture

Construction & Materials Outlook September 4, 2009

Transcription:

Labor Market Equilibrium Prof. Kang-Shik Choi Yonsei University 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved,

Order is not pressure which is imposed on society from without, but an equilibrium which is set up from within. -Jose Ortega y Gasset 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 2

Equilibrium in a Single Competitive Labor Market Competitive equilibrium occurs when supply equals demand, generating a competitive wage and employment level. It is unlikely that the labor market is ever in an equilibrium, since supply and demand are dynamic. The model suggests that the market is always moving toward equilibrium. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 3

Efficiency Pareto efficiency exists when all possible gains from trade have been exhausted. When the state of the world is (Pareto) Efficient, to improve one person s welfare necessarily requires decreasing another person s welfare. In policy applications, ask whether a change can make any one better off without harming anyone else. If the answer is yes, then the proposed change is said to be Paretoimproving. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 4

Equilibrium in a Competitive Labor Market w * Dollars P Q S D 0 The labor market is in equilibrium when supply equals demand; E* workers are employed at a wage of w*. In equilibrium, all persons who are looking for work at the going wage can find a job. The triangle P gives the producer surplus; the triangle Q gives the worker surplus. A competitive market maximizes the value of output, or the sum P + Q. E L E * E H Employment 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 5

Competitive Equilibrium Across Labor Markets If workers were mobile and entry and exit of workers to the labor market was free, then there would be a single wage paid to all workers. The allocation of workers to firms equating the wage to the value of marginal product is also the allocation that maximizes national income (this is known as allocative efficiency). The invisible hand process: self-interested workers and firms accomplish a social goal that no one had in mind, i.e., allocative efficiency. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 6

Efficiency Revisited The single wage property of a competitive equilibrium has important implications for economic efficiency. Recall that in a competitive equilibrium the wage equals the value of marginal product of labor. As firms and workers move to the region that provides the best opportunities, they eliminate regional wage differentials. Therefore, workers of given skills have the same value of marginal product of labor in all markets. The allocation of workers to firms that equates the value of marginal product across markets is also the sorting that leads to an efficient allocation of labor resources. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 7

Wages and International Trade: NAFTA NAFTA created a free trade zone in North America. Free trade reduces the income differential between the United States and other countries in the zone, such as Mexico. Total income of the countries in the trade zone is maximized as a result of equalized economic opportunities across the countries in the zone. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 8

Competitive Equilibrium in Two Labor Markets Linked by Migration Dollars Dollars S N s S S S S w N A w * B w * C w S (a) The Northern Labor Market D N Employment (b) The Southern Labor Market D S Employment Suppose the wage in the northern region (w N ) exceeds the wage in the southern region (w S ). Southern workers want to move North, shifting the southern supply curve to the left and the northern supply curve to the right. In the end, wages are equated across regions at w*. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 9

Wage Convergence Across States 5.7 LA Percent Annual Wage Growth 5.5 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.7 MS AR GA FL NC SC MENH VT VA TN AL ND NE RI SD KS MD MA IA CT DE OK MO PA MN TX WI NM UT AZ NJ WV IN IL CO NY KY MT CA NV MI ID WA OR OH 4.5.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 Manufacturing Wage in 1950 WY Source: Olivier Jean Blanchard and Lawrence F. Katz, Regional Evolutions, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1 (1992): 1-61. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 10

Payroll Taxes and Subsidies Payroll taxes assessed on employers lead to a downward, parallel shift in the labor demand curve. The new demand curve shows a wedge between the amount the firm must pay to hire a worker and the amount that workers actually receive. Payroll taxes increase total costs of employment, so these taxes reduce employment in the economy. Firms and workers share the cost of payroll taxes, since the cost of hiring a worker rises and the wage received by workers declines. Payroll taxes result in deadweight losses. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 11

The Impact on Payroll Tax Assessed on Firms w 1 + 1 w 0 1 Dollars w 0 w 1 B E 1 E 0 A D 1 S D 0 A payroll tax of $1 assessed on employers shifts down the demand curve (from D 0 to D 1 ). The payroll tax decreases the wage that workers receive from w 0 to w 1, and increases the cost of hiring a worker from w 0 to w 1 + 1. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 12

The Impact on Payroll Tax Assessed on Workers Dollars w 0 + 1 w 1 w 0 w 1 1 D 1 S 1 S 0 D 0 A payroll tax assessed on workers shifts the supply curve to the left (from S 0 to S 1 ). The payroll tax has the same impact on the equilibrium wage and employment regardless of who it is assessed on. E 1 E 0 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 13

The Impact on Payroll Tax Put on Firms Dollars w 0 w 0 1 with Inelastic Supply E 0 S D 0 A B D 1 D 0 Employment A payroll tax assessed on the firm is shifted completely to workers when the labor supply curve is perfectly inelastic. The wage is initially w 0. The $1 payroll tax shifts the demand curve to D 1, and the wage falls to w 0 1. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 14

Payroll Subsidies An employment subsidy lowers the cost of hiring for firms. This means payroll subsidies shift the demand curve for labor to the right (up). Total employment will increase as the cost of hiring has fallen. 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 15

The Impact of an Employment Subsidy w 0 + 1 w 1 w 0 w 1 1 A B D 0 S D 1 An employment subsidy of $1 per worker hired shifts up the labor demand curve, increasing employment. The wage that workers receive rises from w 0 to w 1. The wage that firms actually pay falls from w 0 to w 1 1. E 0 E 1 Employment 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 16

The Impact of a Mandated Benefit Dollars S 0 Dollars S 0 w * w * + C S P 1 w 0 + B P S 1 w 0 w 1 Q w * R w 0 C w * R D 0 D 0 D 1 D 1 E 1 E * E 0 Employment E 0 Employment (a) Cost of mandate exceeds worker s valuation (b) Cost of mandate equals worker s valuation 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 17