SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATES IN NORTHEAST KANSAS

Similar documents
RESPONSE OF DRILLED EARLY CORN TO SEVERAL PLANT POPULATIONS

This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived.

(IRRIGATED & & DRYLAND

This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived.

2008 Sunflower Performance Tests

RELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS

University of California Cooperative Extension KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA

Soybean Yield and Yield Component Response to Plant Density in Narrow Row Systems

THE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Grain Sorghum Production Management

Keeping Up With Research 128

Corn Row Width and Plant Density Then and Now. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

Fall Freeze Damage in Summer Grain Crops

KANSAS FERTILIZER RESEARCH FUND PROPOSAL

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Winter Canola Performance Tests

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Sorghum Production For Maximum Yields. Kraig Roozeboom Agronomy Extension Crop Production/Cropping Systems

2009 Sunflower Performance Tests

DESCRIPTION OF THE TESTS

Grain Sorghum Production Management

Planting Date by Maturity Group in Kansas: 2016 Season and Three-Year Summary

GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF WHEAT SEEDLINGS AFTER DEHYDRATION AND REHYDRATION

2018 Soybean Planting Date x Variety Trial

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2005

This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived.

North Dakota Flax Variety Trial Results for 2017 and Selection Guide

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008

VALUE OF A ONE-TIME SWEEP APPLICATION IN MANAGING NO-TILL FALLOW

KANSAS CORN TESTS, 1944

Evaluation of 15 inch Row Wheat and Double-Crop Soybean in the Mid-South

THE PRODUCTION OF SORGHUM IN WATER- RESTRICTED CROP SYSTEMS IN THE USA

1. Skip-row corn research in western Kansas 1 2. Soybean Populations 2 3. WRAPS projects update 4 4. Triticum Mosaic Virus in Kansas 5

Alfalfa Management in North Dakota

KANSAS FERTILIZER RESEARCH 2000

SUMMER ANNUAL FORAGES

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2007

2007 Soybean Variety Performance

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

March 2018 USDA SUPPLY/DEMAND ESTIMATES. Overview

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH CORN HYBRIDS HV SG ED KW. standard dryland standard irrigated short-season dryland short-season irrigated

Grain Sorghum HYBRID TRIALS, Mississippi. Information Bulletin 489 November 2014 GEORGE M. HOPPER, DIRECTOR

2016 Kansas Performance Tests with. Sunflower Hybrids. summer fallow dryland irrigated. Report of Progress 1133

2017 Virginia Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

Table of Contents. Test Objectives and Procedures Data Interpretation Oilseed Tests Table 1. Colby Fallow, Thomas County...

ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM. Final Report. Optimizing Soil Fertility Requirements for Corn. Leo Espinoza, Soils Specialist, University of Arkansas

2010 UGA Cotton Defoliant Evaluation Program

Crop Production Summary, Southeast Kansas 2017

Special Issue. Tillage Trends in Kansas

Herbicides for Use on High ph Soils in the Wheat Fallow System in Southwest Kansas

Ten Crop Sequences, Transition to No-Till

Wheat Program Update Yield and Protein Determination

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

NO-TILL CROP ROTATIONS WITH LIMITED IRRIGATION

2014 GULF COAST UNIFORM CORN HYBRID TRIALS

Research & Development and Product Development Update Scott Staggenborg, VP, Research & Development

COVER CROP. Sponsored by: In partnership with:

OKLAHOMA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2009

DESCRIPTION OF THE TESTS

Grain Sorghum and Corn Comparisons: Yield, Economic and Environmental Responses. S.A. Staggenborg*, K.C. Dhuyvetter, and W.B.

Irrigation Impact and Trends in Kansas Agricultural 1

2012 Kansas Performance Tests with. Sunflower Hybrids. summer fallow dryland irrigated. Report of Progress 1078

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

2012 annual report. Robert G. Hall SDSU Extension Agronomist Kevin K. Kirby Agricultural Research Manager Shawn Hawks Agricultural Research Manager

Rick Mascagni and Kylie Cater

2012 annual report. Robert G. Hall SDSU Extension Agronomist Kevin K. Kirby Agricultural Research Manager Shawn Hawks Agricultural Research Manager

Report of Progress 893 FIELD RESEARCH. IRRIGATION Scandia. KANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION KSU Manhattan

The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Effects of Foliar Application of Boron and Dimilin on Soybean Yield

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

2016 Dry Bean Planter Type Trial

Economics of Soil Fertility Management

Effects of Twin-Row Spacing on Corn Silage Growth Development and Yield in the Shenandoah Valley

Estimating Irrigation Water Requirements

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Economics of Soil Fertility Management

2016 Virginia Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

ricultural Making Better Decisions Experiment Station 2014 Colorado Sunflower Variety Performance Trials Technical Report TR 14-10

Kansas Field Research Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE LIMITED IRRIGATION SORGHUM SILAGE PERFORMANCE TRIAL, 2007

Number 183 March 27, 2009

How Nitrification Inhibitors Perform in Kansas*

Abstract. Introduction

SORGHUM YIELD RESPONSE TO WATER AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT. Alan Schlegel Agronomist-in-Charge, Soil Management. Kansas State Research and Extension

LIMITED IRRIGATION OF FOUR SUMMER CROPS IN WESTERN KANSAS. Alan Schlegel, Loyd Stone, and Troy Dumler Kansas State University SUMMARY

Institute of Ag Professionals

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

KANSAS FERTILIZER RESEARCH 1998

Soybean Varieties. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1058

Investigators: Dennis Tonks, WSU Extension Dryland Farming Specialist, Davenport Aaron Esser, WSU Extension On-Farm Testing Associate, Ritzville

2013 Organic Spring Wheat Planting Date Trial

DUAL-PURPOSE WINTER CANOLA IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: FORAGE MANAGEMENT

Report of Progress 876. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service FIELD RESEARCH. IRRIGATION Scandia

Transcription:

June 1996 SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATES IN NORTHEAST KANSAS S.A. Staggenborg, D.L. Devlin, D.L. Fjell, J.P. Shroyer, W.B. Gordon, B.H. Marsh and L.D. Maddux Soybean is a major crop in northeast Kansas and plays an important role in summer row-crop rotations. Since the early 1980 s, planting soybeans in narrow rows (10 in or less) has become popular and is used for approximately 50% of the soybeans in the region. Row spacing and seeding recommendations generally are developed from results of field experiments and local experience. Kansas producers typically plant between 130,000 and 180,000 seeds/a with 30-in rows and increase seeding rates by approximately 10 to 25% with narrow rows. Yields vary tremendously depending on soil and environmental conditions, with yield potential being 20 to 25 bu/a in some locations and 50 to 60 bu/a in others. This study was designed to determine the influence of environment on optimum row spacing and seeding rates for soybeans in northeast Kansas. Procedures Ten field experiments were conducted over a 3-year period from 1991 to 1993 at various dryland sites in northeast Kansas (Table 1). Rates of 52,272; 104,544; 156,186; 209,088 seeds/a were used every year, and an additional rate of 261,360 seeds/a was included at each location in

Table 1. Planting dates, soybean cultivar, and total rainfall received during the growing season (May- September) for individual site-years. Site Year Planting Soybean Growing Season Date Cultivar Rainfall (in.) Belleville Manhattan Powhattan Rossville Topeka 1992 May 22 Corsica 22.4 1993 May 28 Corsica 38.4 1991 May 15 Resnik 12.8 1992 May 21 Corsica 26.1 1993 May 27 Corsica 46.0 1991 June 5 Resnik 8.9 1992 May 15 Corsica 21.9 1993 May 21 Corsica 32.5 1992 May 22 Corsica 16.6 1992 and 1993. Row spacings were 8 and 30 in. A factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design with three or four replications was used. Grain yield and final plant heights were determined at maturity. Yield Results Average site-year soybean yields ranged from 21.9 to 62.8 bu/a as the result of a range of planting dates and rainfall amounts. Initially, all data were combined and statistically analyzed. The F-test (not shown) indicated that the site x seeding rate, site x row spacing, and site x seeding rate x row spacing interactions were significant. Each siteyear was designated as high-, medium-, or low-yielding based on its average grain yield. The high-yielding group consisted of four site-years with yields of greater than 50 bu/a. The medium-yielding group consisted of three locations with grain yields between 40 and 50 bu/a. The low-yielding group consisted of two locations with yields below 40 bu/a. The data were reanalyzed within each yield group (Table 2). In high-yielding environments, seeding rates affected soybean yields differently in 8-in rows than in 30-in rows (Figure 1). In 30-in rows, increasing seeding rates from 52,000 to over 250,000 seeds/a had little effect on grain yield, with the maximum yield of 57 bu/a at approximately 110,000 seeds/a. In 8-in. rows, grain yields increased as seeding rates increased, with the maximum yield of 59 bu/a at approximately 203,000 seeds/a. Under low seeding rates, the 30-in rows outyielded the 8-in rows, whereas the 8-in rows were superior when seeding rates exceeded 155,000 seeds/a. Increasing seeding rates under medium-yielding environments affected soybean yield differently in 8-in rows than in 30-in rows (Figure 2). The responses were similar to those in high-yielding environments. The maximum yield of 46 bu/a in a 30-in rows was at 115,000 seeds/a, whereas the maximum yield of 50 bu/a in 8-in rows was at 225,000 seeds/a.

Table 2. F-test significance for soybean grain yields across site-years with high, medium, and low yields. Yield Group Variable High Medium Low Site (S) Seeding Rate (SR) S x SR Row Spacing (RS) S x RS SR x RS S x SR x RS CV, % *** ** ** *** *** NS NS NS ** *** *** NS 9.0 9.6 15.6 **, *** Significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 probability levels, respectively. NS = not significant Yields from 30-in rows were greater than yields from 8-in rows at low seeding rates, but yields from the 8-in rows were greater when the seeding rate exceeded approximately 155,000 seeds/a. When rainfall during the growing season limited soybean yields, increased seeding rates affected yield more in 8-in rows than in the 30-in rows (Figure 3). Under these conditions, yields in the 30-in rows declined slightly as seeding rate increased initially, but then remained unchanged as rates increased to over 200,000 seeds/a. In the 8-in rows, grain yields increased as seeding rates increased, reaching a maximum at approximately 140,000 seeds/a but then declining as seeding rates increased more. Yields from the 30-in rows exceeded those from the 8-in rows at all seeding rates. These data indicate that when growing season rainfall was plentiful, soybeans planted in 8-in rows produced higher yields than soybeans planted in 30-in rows. As the water supply began to decline, the 8-in rows lost this advantage. When soil moisture was limited during the reproductive Figure 1. Soybean yield at two row spacings and five seeding rates combined over site-years with high

Figure 2. Soybean yield at two row spacings and five seeding rates combined over site-years with medium Figure 3. Soybean yield at two row spacings and five seeding rates combined over site-years with low Table 3. F-test significance for soybean mature plant height across site-years with high, medium, and low yields. Yield Group Variable High Medium Low Site (S) Seeding Rate (SR) S x SR Row Spacing (RS) S x RS SR x RS S x SR x RS CV, % *** ** NS *** *** NS *** NS NS 9.0 9.6 10.5 **, *** Significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 probability levels, respectively NS = not significant

Figure 4. Soybean mature plant height at two row spacings and five seeding rates combined over siteyears with high yields. Vertical bars represent LSD (0.05). Figure 5. Soybean mature plant height at five seeding rates combined over site-years with medium stage, soybeans planted in 30-in rows had greater yields than those in 8-in rows. These results agree with the results of other research indicating that soybeans in 8-in rows used water less efficiently than soybeans in wider rows under severe moisture stress. Plant Height Results Plant height at maturity was analyzed in the same manner as grain yield. The seeding rate x row spacing interaction was significant for the high-yielding environments, whereas only seeding rates affected plant height in the mediumyielding environment (Table 3). Plant height at maturity increased as seeding rates increased in the high- and medium-yielding environments. In

the high-yielding environments, mature plant heights were greater in 30-in rows than 8-in rows, when seeding rates were less than 150,000 seeds/a. When the seeding rate was greater than that, mature plant heights were greater in the 8-in rows (Figure 4). In the medium-yielding environment, plant heights increased as seeding rates increased across both row spacings (Figure 5). When soil moisture was limiting, mature plant heights were not affected by row spacing or seeding rate. Summary The results of this study indicate that environmental conditions affect soybean response to seeding rates and row spacings. Mature plant heights increased as seeding rates increased when growing-season soil moisture was adequate but were not affected by row spacing or seeding rate in moisture-limiting environments. Differences in yield indicated that recommendations for soybean rows spacings and seeding rates must be adjusted based on expected yield goals. Under high- and medium-yielding environments where adequate soil moisture exists, narrow rows should be recommended over wide rows. When narrow rows are used, producers should increase seeding rates to approximately 210,000 seeds/a. In environments where soil moisture is limiting, wide rows should be used to increase yield stability. Acknowledgments The authors recognize the Kansas Soybean Commission, the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Kansas Cooperative Extension Service for their financial support of this project. *Extension Specialist, Crops & Soils, Northeast; Extension Specialist and Coordinator, Environmental Quality; Extension Specialist, Crops; and Extension Specialist, Crops, Department of Agronomy; Agronomist-In-Charge, North Central & Irrigation Exp. Fld.; Agronomist-In-Charge, Cornbelt Exp. Fld.; Agronomist-In-Charge, Kansas River Valley Exp. Fld.; respectively. Contribution no. 96-446-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Agricultural Experiment Station Kansas State University Manhattan 66506-4008 SRL 112 June 1996 Kansas State University is committed to a policy of nondiscrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation, or other nonmerit reasons, in admissions, educational programs or activities, and employment (including employment of disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam Era), all as required by applicable laws and regulations. Responsibility for coordination of compliance efforts and receipt of inquiries, including those concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, has been delegated to Jane D Rowlett, Ph.D., Director of Unclassified Affairs and University Compliance, Kansas State University, 111 Anderson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506-0124 (913-532-4392). 1M