Interpretation of SECTION 12 DESIGN AND DETAILING FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADS IS

Similar documents
Supplemental Structural Correction Sheet Steel Brace Frame Design (2017 LABC)

22. DESIGN OF STEEL BRACED FRAMES Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER ALLENTOWN, PA

Seismic Steel Design 12/9/2012

Supplemental Structural Correction Sheet Steel Moment Frame Design (2017 LABC)

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 MOMENT END-PLATE CONNECTIONS

Steel Seismic Force Resisting Systems

2. LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Survey and Testing of Pre-1988 Braced Frame Structures From The West Coast of the United States

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

steelwise A Closer Look at Steel Plate Shear Walls

7. SPECIFIC RULES FOR STEEL CONCRETE COMPOSITE BUILDINGS

manualwise BRACED FOR BETTER SEISMIC DESIGN

Portal frame PLASTIC DESIGN OF PORTAL FRAMES

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development REVISION OF IS: A REVIEW (PART 2)

THE BRACE CONNECTION THE BOLTED OPTION FIGURE 1 MODEL SHOWING THE BOILER AND THE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SYSTEM (BOILER BUILDING)

Principles of STRUCTURAL DESIGN. Wood, Steel, and Concrete SECOND EDITION RAM S. GUPTA. CRC Press. Taylor& Francis Group

Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

POTENTIALLY PLASTIC ZONES CONFIGURATIONS IN BOTTOM COLUMNS OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF SCBF BRACED FRAME GUSSET PLATE CONNECTIONS

Types Of Roofs - Vault

Ductile Design of Steel Structures

Beam/Column Plastic Moment Capacity Ratio

Overview of Presentation. SCBFs are Conceptually Truss Structures

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1. BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building Part 1: Code of practice for design of simple and continuous construction, BSI, 1990

SEISMIC CODE DEVELOPMENT FOR STEEL STRUCTURES by Helmut Krawinkler*

ISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings

Learning Objectives. Topics. Moment Frames: Design and Detailing per AISC 341 and 358. Topics. Lateral Analysis/Choosing your Code

The Effect of Axial Force on the Behavior of Flush End-Plate Moment Connections

Multi storey buildings

Ordinary Moment Frames

NODIA AND COMPANY. GATE SOLVED PAPER Civil Engineering Design of Steel Structure. Copyright By NODIA & COMPANY

CE 591 Fall 2013 Lecture 21: Beam-Column Connections

DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES

This Technical Note describes how this program can be used in the design of continuity plates.

GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL BRIDGES

CHAPTER 14 SLOTTEDWEB (SW) MOMENT CONNECTION

ADVANTAGES OF USING REDUCED CROSS-SECTIONS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT STEEL STRUCTURES

CIRCULAR TUBE COLUMNS IN HIGH STRENGTH STEEL Economical solutions for building frames

THE AISC SEISMIC PROVISIONS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

LATEST UPDATES TO U.S. SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING REPORT HOLDER: SEISMIC STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

2016 AISC Standards. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings & Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges.

Influence of Steel Plate Shear Wall on Multistorey Steel Building

Design of steel structures. Design of tension members by working stress method and limit stage method

STEEL REACTION FRAME

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby.

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

Experimental Study on the Effects of Different Concentric Bracing Configuration on Steel Frames Inelastic Behavior

Seismic Design Principles for RC Structures

Seismic design of braced frame gusset plate connections

THE USE OF DUCTILITY IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Displacement Based Assessment and Improvement of a Typical New Zealand Building by an Average Engineer

Devil is in the Details. Brian Crowder, P.E.

STUDY OF SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF SCBF WITH BALANCED BRACING

Ductility and Ultimate Strength of Eccentric Braced Frame

Council on Tall Buildings

Contents. Tables. Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters. Foreword.

AISI S E1 AISI STANDARD. Errata to North American Specification. for the Design of Cold-Formed. Steel Structural Members.

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE TIRUCHIRAPALLI

Cyclic Loading Tests Of Steel Dampers Utilizing Flexure-Analogy of Deformation

OUT-OF-PLANE BUCKLING BEHAVIOUR OF BRB GUSSET PLATE CONNECTIONS

`Limit State of Collapse in Compression Design of an Axially Loaded Short Column

A Comparative Study on Non-Linear Analysis of Frame with and without Structural Wall System

steelwise WHAT S NEW WITH PREQUALIFIED CONNECTIONS? A look at the latest version of AISC 358.

DIN EN : (E)

IN-ELASTIC PERFORMANCE OF 2D-TWO BAY ORDINARY CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAME

Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.

Structural Glossary. ARCH 631 Structural Glossary F2014abn

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

BEAMS, PURLINS AND BRACING. 5.1 General The design of beams for strength is usually governed by one of the following limit states:

Analysis of Various Steel Bracing Systems using Steel Sections for High Rise Structures

Section F ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES. G.K. Sidwell*

mortarless masonry Design Manual Part 1 (IS 456:2000) Section 1 Page 1 IS 456:2000 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING NON- DUCTILE STEEL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

Comparison between Seismic Behavior of Suspended Zipper Braced Frames and Various EBF Systems

Basic quantities of earthquake engineering. Strength Stiffness - Ductility

0306 SEISMIC LOADS GENERAL

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF LOW-RISE NONDUCTILE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS BY BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES

Chapter 8 Commentary STEEL STRUCTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Issued November 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal November 1, 2012.

EFFECTS OF COLUMN SPLICE LOCATION ON SEISMIC DEMANDS IN STEEL MOMEMNT FRAMES CONSIDERING SPLICE FLEXIBILITY

(a) Pin-Pin P cr = (b) Fixed-Fixed P cr = (d) Fixed-Pin P cr =

Effect of Concentric Braces on the Behaviour of Steel Structure by Pushover Analysis

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

4.6 Procedures for Connections

ARCH 331. Study Guide for Final Examination

A seismic engineer s note book

Supplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame

ACHIEVING DUCTILE BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT CONNECTIONS PART II

GENERAL TOPICS & MEMBER DESIGN

Tech Tips SidePlate Connections FAQ 09/30/2017

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF SPECIAL CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES WITH ECCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES

Composite Steel/Concrete

Transcription:

Interpretation of SECTION 12 DESIGN AND DETAILING FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADS 12.1 General IS 800-2007 Steel frames shall be so designed and detailed as to give them adequate strength, stability and ductility to resist severe earthquakes in all zones classified in IS:1893 (Part 1) without collapse. Frames which form a part of the gravity load resisting system but are not intended to resist the lateral earthquake loads, need not satisfy the requirements of this section, provided they can accommodate the resulting deformation without premature failure. Steel Frames in a structural system may be assigned as follows: Frames which resist severe earthquake loads Frames which donot resist earthquake loads Steel frames which are to be designed and detailed to resist severe earthquake loads shall be designed and detailed to have a) adequate strength, b) stability, c) ductility in all zones which are classified in IS: 1893 so that it doesnot collapse. Those frames of a framing system which are intended to resist the lateral earthquake loads need to satisfy the requirements stated in this chapter. Rest frames which are a part of the structural system resisting the gravity load resisting system need not satisfy the requirements of this section. They should only resist the resulting deformation without failing prematurely. 12.2 Load and Load Combinations 12.2.1 Earthquake loads shall be calculated as per IS: 1893 (Part 1), except that the reduction factors recommended in 12.3 may be used. IS: 1893 Part 1 (Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures) suggests methods of calculating the earthquake loads. The Response Reduction factors given in Table 7 of IS 1893 are to be followed in all situations except in cases of a) Braced Frame system (for OCBF, SCBF, EBF) and b) Moment Frame system (for OMF and SMF). For these cases the Response Reduction Factor should be considered as per Table 23 of the Code. However Table 7 of IS: 1893 deals with Concentric, Eccentric and Moment resisting frames in Steel. Table 23 deals in much detail on the same types of frames. Conclusion: For Steel frames Table 23 covers most of the types of frames. 12.2.2 In the limit state design of frames resisting earthquake loads, the load combinations shall be conform to Table 4. Limit State of Strength Limit state of Serviceability Combination LL LL DL EL DL EL Leading Accompanying Leading Accompanying DL+LL+CL+EL 1.2 1.2 0.53 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8

DL+LL+CL-EL 1.2 1.2 0.53 DL+EL DL- EL 1.5 (0.9)* 1.5 (0.9)* (-) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 (-) 0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 (-) 1.5 1.0 * This value is to be considered when the dead load contributes to stability against overturning is critical or the dead load causes reduction in stress due to other loads. * When action of different live loads is simultaneously considered, the leading live load is whichever one causes the higher load effects in the member/section. Abbreviations: DL= Dead Load, LL= Imposed Load (Live Loads), EL= Earthquake Load. (-) 1.0 12.2.3 In addition, the following load combination shall be considered as required in 12.5.1.1, 12.7.3.1, 12.11.2.2 and 12.11.3.4. Combination a) 1.2DL +0.5 LL±2.5 EL b) 0.9DL ± 2.5 EL DL Limit State of Strength LL Leading Accompanying DL+LL+CL+ EL 1.2 0.5 2.5 DL+LL+CL- EL 1.2 0.5 (-) 2.5 DL+ EL 0.9 2.5 DL- EL 0.9 (-) 2.5 EL Please refer to the commentary on the corresponding clauses 12.5.1.1, 12.5.1.2, 12.11.2.2, 12.11.3.4 12.3 Response Reduction Factor For structures designed and detailed as per the provision of this section, the response reduction factors specified in Table 23 may be used in conjunction with the provision in IS: 1893 for calculating the design earthquake forces.

TABLE 23 RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR FOR BUILDING SYSTEM (Section 23) SI.No Lateral Load Resisting System R i) ii) Braced frame systems: a) Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames (OCBF) b) Special Concentrically Braced Frame (SCBF) c) Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF) Moment Frame System: a) Ordinary Moment Frame (OMF) b) Special Moment Frame (SMF) 4 4.5 5 4 5 As specified in Clause 12.2.1 the Response Reduction factors given in Table 7 of IS 1893 are to be followed in all situations except in cases of a) Braced Frame system (for OCBF, SCBF, EBF) and b) Moment Frame system (for OMF and SMF). For these cases the Response Reduction Factor should be considered as per Table 23 of the Code. However Table 7 of IS: 1893 deals with Concentric, Eccentric and Moment resisting frames in Steel. Table 23 deals in much detail on the same types of frames. Conclusion: Table 23 covers most of the types of frames. So that table becomes guiding. 12.4 Connections, Joints and Fasteners 12.4.1 All bolts used in frames designed to resist earthquake loads shall be fully tensioned High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) bolts or turned and fitted bolts. HSFG bolts conforming to IS: 4000 or Turned and Fitted Bolts conforming to IS 1364 to be used for connection. The bolts are to be fully tensioned. 12.4.2 All welds used in frames designed to resist earthquake loads shall be complete penetration butt welds, except in column splice, which shall confirm to 12.5.2. All welds should be full penetration butt weld except for column splice. No other type of weld (ie fillet, spot, intermittent etc.) is allowed 12.4.3 Bolted joints shall be designed not to share load in combination with welds on the same faying surface. A joint which is connected by bolts and welds do not share the loads between bolts and welds simultaneously. Forces are transferred either totally by bolts or totally by welds. Thus bolts are to be separately designed to transfer the total forces. Same for the welds

12.4 Columns 12.5.1 Column Strength When P r /P d is greater than 0.4, the requirements in 12.5.1.1 and 12.5.1.2 shall be met where P r = required compressive strength of the member P d = design stress in axial compression as obtained from 7.1.2 Pr = required Compressive strength of the member Or in other words Pr = the actual factored Comp. load acting on the column from the load combinations specified in table 4 of IS : 800 2007 i.e. from load combinations i) DL + LL + CL + EL = 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 0.53 CL + 1.2 EL ii) DL + LL + CL EL = 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 0.53 CL 1.2 EL iii) DL + EL = 1.5 DL + 1.5 EL iv) DL EL = 1.5 DL 1.5 EL Pd = Design strength in axial compression = Ae.fcd (Clause 7.1.2) 12.5.1.1 The required axial compressive and axial tensile strength in the absence of applied moment, shall be determined from load combination in 12.2.3 If Pr / Pd > 0.4 and has no external bending moment then the actual factored comp. strength and / or actual tensile strength acting on the frame should be calculated based on the following load combinations: i) DL + LL + EL = 1.2 DL + 0.5 LL + 2.5 EL ii) DL + LL - EL = 1.2 DL + 0.5 LL 2.5 EL iii) DL + EL = 0.9 DL + 2.5 EL iv) DL - EL = 0.9 DL 2.5 EL Applied moment is zero only for frames OCBF and SCBF 12.5.1.2 The required strength determined in 12.5.1.1 need not exceed either of the maximum load transferred to the column considering 1.2 times the nominal strength of the connecting beam or brace element, or the resistance of the foundation to uplift. The actual factored compressive strength / actual factored tensile strength should be less than either of the max : i) Pr 1.2 X nominal strength of the connectivity beam i.e. 1.2 x Zp. fy ii) Pr 1.2 x nominal strength of the brace element Pd =1.2 x Ae. fy / m0 or 1.2 x iii) Ae.fcd Pr Resistance of the foundation to uplift If a) Pr / Pd > 0.4 and has external BM or b) Pr / Pd < 0.4 and has external BM or

c) Pr / Pd < 0.4 and has no external moment then factored axial compressive load (Pr) will be as derived from load combinations given in Table 4 of IS 800 2007. NB.DL indicates Dead Load, LL indicates Live Load, EL indicates Earthquake Load 12.5.2 Column splice 12.5.2.1 A Partial-joint penetration groove weld may be provided in column splice, such that the design strength of the joints shall be at least equal to 200 percent of the required strength. Partial penetration butt weld is allowed in column splices. Pd 2 x Pr of the joint 12.5.2.2 The minimum required strength for each flange splice shall be 1.2 times f y A f as shown Fig 20 where A f is the area of each flange in the smaller connected column P min =1.2 f y A f P min =1.2 f y A f FIG 20 PARTIAL PENETRATION GROOVE WELD IN COLUMN SPLICE The size of the Flange splice plate maybe determined by using the equation Pmin = 1.2 x fy x Af, where Pmin is the minimum strength of the flange splice plate. 12.6 Storey Drift The storey drift limits shall conform to IS: 1893. The deformation compatibility of members not designed to resist seismic lateral load shall also conform to IS: 1893 (Part 1). Clause 7.11 of IS 1893 deals with this issue Max. drift = 0.004 x story height. Max drift to be calculated against min. specified design lateral Eq force with a Partial factor of safety 1.0

TYPES OF FRAMES Frames Braced Moment OCBF SCBF EBF OMF SMF OCBF= Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames SCBF = Special Concentrically Braced Frames EBF = Eccentrically Braces Frames OMF = Ordinary Moment Frames SMF = Special Moment Frames Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames (OCBF) (a) Diagonal bracing (b) Cross or X-bracing (c) Chevron bracing Ordinary Concentric Bracing systems in Steel Frames 12.7 Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames (OCBF) 12.7.1 Ordinary concentrically braced frames (OCBF) should be shown to withstand inelastic deformation corresponding at a joint rotation of 0.02 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value. Ordinary concentrically braced frames meeting the requirements of this section shall be deemed to satisfy the required inelastic deformation. Frame should withstand inelastic deformation corresponding at a joint rotation of 0.02 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value.

12.7.1.1 Ordinary concentrically braced frames shall not be used in seismic zones IV and V and for buildings with importance factor greater than unity (I > 1.0) in seismic zone III. OCBF shall not be used in seismic zones IV and V and for buildings with I > 1.0 in seismic zone III. 12.7.1.2 The provision in this section apply for diagonal and X- bracing only. Specialist literature may be consulted for V and inverted-v type bracing. K- bracing shall not be permitted in systems to resist earthquake. Diagonal and X- bracing only permitted. K- bracing not permitted Specialist literature may be consulted for V and inverted-v type bracing.. 12.7.2 Bracing Members L/rmin 120 12.7.2.1 The slenderness of bracing members shall not exceed 120. 12.7.2.2 The required compressive strength of bracing member shall not exceed 0.8 times P d where P d is the design strength in axial compression (see 7.1.2) Pr 0.8 x Pd. Pd = Ae x fcd 12.7.2.3 Along any line of bracing, braces shall be provided such that for lateral loading in either direction, the tension braces will have to resist between 30 to 70 percent of the total lateral load. 12.7.2.4 Bracing cross-section can be plastic, compact or semi-compact, but not slender as defined in 3.7.2. Bracing cross-section can be plastic, compact or semi-compact, but not slender 12.7.2.5 For all built-up braces, the spacing of tack fasteners shall be such that the unfavorable slenderness ratio of individual element, between such fasteners, shall not exceed 0.4 times the governing slenderness ratio of the brace itself. Bolted connections shall be avoided within the middle one-fourth of the clear brace length (0.25 times the length in the middle). 12.7.2.6 The bracing members shall be designed so that gross area yielding (see 6.2) and not the net area rupture (see 6.3) would govern the design tensile strength. 12.7.3 Bracing Connections 12.7.3.1 End connections in bracings shall be designed to withstand the minimum of the following a) A tensile force in the bracing equal to 1.1 f y A g.

b) Force in the brace due to load combinations in 12.2.3: and c) Maximum force that can be transferred to the brace by the system. Shall be designed to withstand the minimum of the following a) Tg = 1.1x fyag. b) The force in the brace due to load combinations in 12.2.3 c) The maximum force that can be transferred to the brace by the system. 12.7.3.2 The connection should be checked for tension, rupture and block shear under the load determined in 12.7.3.1. 12.7.3.3 The connection shall be designed to withstand a moment of 1.2 times the full plastic moment of the braced section about the buckling axis. Md = 1.2 x Mp of the braced section 12.7.3.4 Gusset plates shall be checked for buckling out of their plane. Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBF) Special Concentric Bracing systems in Steel Frames 12.8 Special Concentrically Braced Frames (SCBF) 12.8.1 Special concentrically braced frames (SCBF) should be shown to withstand inelastic deformation corresponding to a joint rotation of at least 0.04 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value. Special concentrically braced frames meeting the requirements of this section shall be deemed to satisfy the required inelastic deformations. SCBF to withstand inelastic deformation corresponding to a joint rotation of 0.04 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value 12.8.1.1 Special concentrically braced frames (SCBF) may be used in any seismic zone (see IS: 1893 (Part 1)) and for any buildings (Importance- factor value). SCBF may be used in any seismic zone for any buildings (I-values).

12.8.1.2 The provision in this section apply for diagonal and X- bracing only. Specialist literature may be consulted for V and inverted V- type bracing. K bracing shall not be permitted in system to resist earthquake. Diagonal and X- bracing only permitted, K bracing is not permitted. Specialist literature may be consulted for V and inverted - V type bracing. 12.8.2 Bracing Members 12.8.2.1 Bracing members shall be made of E250B steel of IS 2062 or steel meeting the requirement of Charpy E> 27J. L/rmin 160 12.8.2.2 The slenderness of bracing members shall not exceed 160 (only hangers) 12.8.2.3 The required compressive strength of bracing member shall not exceed the design strength in axial compression P d (see 7.1.2). Pr Pd. Pd = Ae x fcd 12.8.2.4 Along any line of bracing, braces shall be provided such that for lateral loading in either direction, the tension braces will resist between 30 to 70 percent of the load. 12.8.2.5 Braced cross-section shall be plastic as defined in 3.7.2. Section shall be plastic. Compact, Semi-compact, slender sections are not permitted 12.8.2.6 In built-up braces, the spacing of tack connections shall be such that the slenderness ratio of individual element between such connections shall not exceed 0.4 times the governing slenderness ratio of the brace itself. Bolted connections shall be avoided within the middle one -fourth of the clear brace length (0.25 times the length, in the middle) 12.8.2.7 The bracing members shall be designed so that gross area yielding (see 6.2) and not the net area rupture (see 6.3) would govern the design tensile strength. 12.8.3 Bracing Connections 12.8.3.1 Bracing end connections shall be designed to withstand the minimum of the following, a) A tensile force in the bracing equal to 1.1 f y A g : and b) Maximum force that can be transferred to the brace by the system. Shall be designed to withstand the minimum of the following a) Tg = 1.1x fyag. b) The maximum force that can be transferred to the brace by the system.

12.8.3.2 The connection should be checked for tension rupture and block shear under the load determined in 12.8.3.1. 12.8.3.3 The connection shall be designed to withstand a moment of 1.2 times the full plastic moment of the braced section about the critical buckling axis. Md = 1.2 x Mp of the braced section 12.8.3.4 Gusset plates shall be checked for buckling out of their plane. 12.8.4 Column 12.8.4.1 The column sections used in Special concentrically braced frames (SCBF) shall be plastic as defined in 3.7.2. The column sections shall be plastic 12.8.4.2 Splices shall be located withinbthe middle one third of the column clear height.splices shall be designed for the forces that can be transferred to it. In addition, splices in columns shall be designed to develop at least the nominal shear strength of the smaller connected member and 50 percent of the nominal flexural strength of the smaller connected section. Eccentrically Braces Frames (EBF) Link Beams 12.9 Eccentrically Braces Frames (EBF) Eccentric Bracing systems in Steel Frames 12.9.1 Eccentrically braces frames (EBF) shall be designed in accordance with Specialist literature. Ordinary Moment Frames (OMF)

Ordinary Moment Resisting Framing systems in Steel Frames (a) (b) (c) (d) Types of moment connections 12.10 Ordinary Moment Frames (OMF) 12.10.1 Ordinary moment frames (OMF) should be shown to withstand inelastic deformation corresponding to a joint rotation of 0.02 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value (M p ). Ordinary moment frames meeting the requirements of this section shall be deemed to satisfy the required inelastic deformation. OMF should be shown to withstand inelastic deformation corresponding to a joint rotation of 0.02 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value (Mp) 12.10.1.1 Ordinary moment frames (OMF) shall not be used in seismic zones IV and V and for buildings with importance factor greater than unity (I >1.0) in seismic zone III. OMFshall not be used in seismic zones IV and V and for buildings with importance factor greater than unity (I >1.0) in seismic zone III. 12.10.2 Beam -to-column Joints and Connections Connections are permitted to be Rigid or Semi-rigid moment connections and should satisfy the criteria in 12.10.2.1 to 12.10.2.5.. permitted to be Rigid or Semi-rigid moment connections 12.10.2.1 Rigid moment connections should be designed to withstand a moment of at least 1.2 times either the full plastic moment of the connected beam or the maximum moment that can be delivered by the beam to the jointdue to the induced weakness at the end of the beam, whichever is less.

Rigid moment connections to be designed with 1. Md =1.2 x Mp of the connected beam 2. Md=M max from beam to the joint, whichever is less. 12.10.2.2 Semi-rigid connections should be designed to withstand either a moment of at least 0.5 times the full plastic moment of the connected beam or the maximum moment that can be delivered by the system, whichever is less. The design moment shall be achieved within a rotation of 0.01 radians. The information given in Annex F may be used for checking. Semi-rigid connections should be designed to withstand 1. Md =at least 0.5 x Mp of the connected beam or 2. Md = M max that can be delivered by the system, whichever is less. Md shall be achieved within a rotation of 0.01 radians. 12.10.2.3 The stiffness and strength of semi-rigid connections shall be accounted for in the design and the overall stability of the frame shall be ensured 12.10.2.4 The Rigid and Semi-rigid connections should be designed to withstand a shear resulting from the load combination 1.2DL+0.5LL plus the shear corresponding to the design moment defined in 12.10.2.1 and 12.10.2.2, respectively. Rigid & Semi-rigid connections should be designed to withstand Vd =shear developed by the load combination of 1.2 DL + 0.5 LL + shear developed by Md =1.2 Mp/0.5Mp/M max which ever is less. 12.10.2.5 In Rigid fully welded connections, continuity plates (tension stiffener, see 8.7) of thickness equal to or greater than the thickness of the beam flange shall be provided and welded to the column flanges and web. Special Moment Frames (SMF) Special Moment ResistingFraming systems in Steel Frames 12.11 Special Moment Frames (SMF) 12.11.1 Special moment frames (SMF) shall be made of E 250 B steel of IS: 2062or steel meeting the charpy E>27J and should be shown to withstand inelastic deformation

corresponding to a joint rotation of 0.04 radians without degradation in strength and stiffness below the full yield value (M p ). Special moment frames meeting the requirements of this section shall be deemed to satisfy the required inelastic deformation. Steel of Grade E 250 B of IS 2062 or steel meeting with Charpy E >27J 12.11.1.1 Special moment frames (SMF) may be used in any seismic zone (see IS: 1893 (Part 1)) for any buildings (Importance factor values). 12.11.2 Beam-to-Column Joints and Connections 12.11.2.1 All beam-to-column connections shall be rigid see Annex F and designed to withstand a moment of atleast 1.2 times the full plastic moment of the connected beam. When a reduced beam section is used, its minimum flexural strength shall be atleast equal to 0.8 times the full plastic moment of the unreduced section. Connections are permitted to be Rigid. Rigid moment connections to be designed with 1. Md =1.2 x Mp of the connected beam For reduced beam section 2. Md= 0.8 x Mp of the unreduced section of the beam 12.11.2.2 The connection shall be designed to withstand a shear resulting from the load combination 1.2DL+ 0.5LL plus the shear resulting from the application of 1.2M p in the same direction, at each end of the beam (causing double curvature bending). The shear strength need not exceed the required value corresponding to the load combination in 12.2.3. Rigid connections should be designed to withstand 1. Vd =shear developed by the load combination of 1.2 DL + 0.5 LL + shear developed by Md =1.2 Mp of beam. 12.11.2.3 In column strong axis connections (beam and column web in the same plane), the panel zone shall be checked for shear buckling in accordance with 8.4.2 at the design shear defined in 12.11.2.2. Column web doubler plates or diagonal stiffeners may be used to strengthen the web against shear buckling. 12.11.2.4 The individual thickness of the column webs and doubler plates, shall satisfy the following t d p b ) / 90 ( p where t = thickness of column web or doubler plate d p = panel -zone depth between continuity plate, and b p = panel-zone width between column flanges Continuity plate d p b p

FIG 21 CONTINUITY PLATES 12.11.2.5 Continuity plates (tension stiffeners) (see 8.7) shall be provided in all strong axis welded connections except in end plate connection. 12.11.3 Beam and Column Limitation 12.11.3.1 Beam and column sections shall be either plastic or compactas defined in 3.7.2. At potential plastic hinge locations, they shall be necessarily plastic. 12.11.3.2 The section selected for beams and columns shall satisfy the following relation : M pc 1.2 M pb where = sum of the moment capacity in the column above and below the beam M pc centerline ; and = sum of the moment capacity in the beams at the intersection of the beam and M pb column centerlines. In tall buildings, higher mode effects shall be accounted for in accordance with specialist literature. 12.11.3.3 Lateral support to the column at both top and bottom beam flange levels shall be provided so as to resist at least 2 percent of the beam flange strength, except for the case described in 12.11.3.4. 12.11.3.4 A Plane frame designed as non sway in the direction perpendicular to its plane, shall be checked for buckling, under the load combination specified in 12.2.3. 12.12 Column Bases 12.12.1 Fixed column bases and their anchor bolts should be designed to withstand a moment of 1.2 times the full plastic moment of the column section. The anchor bolts shall be designed to withstand the combined action of shear and tension as well as prying action if any. Design of BASE PLATE and HD Bolt for Fixed joint under bending: 1. Design moment = 1.2 x Mp of the column= 1.2 x (Zp x fy) of the column Load combination for anchor bolt a) Shear + Tension b) prying force, if any 12.12.2 Both fixed and hinges column bases shall be designed to withstand the full shear under any load case or 1.2 times the shear capacity of the column section whichever is higher. Design of BASE PLATE for Fixed/ Hinged joint under shear: 1. Design shear= Actual horizontal shear at the underside of base plate 2. Design shear = 1.2 x (Av x fy/ 3) of the column= 1.2 x shear capacity of col. whichever is higher. Observation: In most situations Sl. No 2 will be higher.

Prepared by Mr M M Ghosh-AGM (C&S), INSDAG References: IS 800-2007, Indian Standard GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL- CODE OF PRACTICE (Third Revision) Teaching Resource Material-INSDAG Acknowledgement: Dr S R Satishkumar-Professor, IIT Madras