Option 11. Divert Water from Miocene and Hendricks Canal to Supply the Ridge

Similar documents
Section 5 Packages. 5.1 Package Development Problem Statements A 5-1

Report. Environmental Water Demands. Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation Integrated Water Resources Plan.

Section 3 Current and Future Water Demand

Technical Memorandum

Section 5 Supply and Demand Analysis

A. Butte County Water Suppliers and Managers

6. Future Water Demands and Supplies

Executive Summary. Integrated Water Resources Program. Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation. May 2005

Sacramento Valley Groundwater: An Approach to Better Understand and Manage the Lower Tuscan Groundwater Resources for Northern California

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ESQUON SUBINVENTORY UNIT

Hydrologic Characteristics of the Owens River Basin below the Upper Owens River

Technical Memorandum. Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CHEROKEE SUBINVENTORY UNIT

Issue paper: Aquifer Water Balance

Draft Initial Study and Proposed Negative Declaration. Redirected Contract PG&E Water from the Miocene Canal to the Thermalito Power Canal

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CHEROKEE SUBINVENTORY UNIT

To manage and conserve water and other resources for the citizens of Butte County

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CHEROKEE SUBINVENTORY UNIT

Case Study: Camp Far West Reservoir Spill as an indicator of water supply availability in the Bear River system for Centennial Reservoir

Kern Water Bank. Kern Water Bank Authority

19 STUDY AREA 19: DURHAM PENTZ/HIGHWAY 99

Natural Resources of the West: Water and Drought

groundwater. Because watersheds are complex systems, each tends to respond differently to natural or human activities.

Draft Fact Sheet Butte County Stable Isotope Recharge Study

THE CALIFORNIA DROUGHT

BIG CHICO CREEK WATERSHED ALLIANCE

Eastside Water District Diffused Surface Water Project PROGRESS REPORT ON EXPENDITURES July 20, Background.

WATER RESOURCE PROGRAM

Water and Power Policy Group

Madera Irrigation District Water Supply Enhancement Project

Building Resiliency to Drought through WaterSMART. Presentation for IFC FLOW 2018 Workshop April 25, 2018

8 WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT

EID POLICY MANUAL. WATER Water Delivery and Operations Policy Revised January [supersedes May ]

Boron, Salinity, Nutrients and Dissolved Oxygen in the Irrigation Water. Water Conservation District

EXISTING EID WATER SUPPLY SOURCES

Groundwater Status Report

AGENDA DATE: November 14, 2018

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES VINA SUBINVENTORY UNIT

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

Beneficial Use of Produced Water: A Case Study of Projects in Colorado and Wyoming

Overview of Conjunctive Management in California Let s Have a Frank Discussion

Staff contact: Mr. Bob Holden, Principal Engineer Phone: (831) Fax: (831)

Lower Tuscan Aquifer. General Description PowerPoint

NOTICE OF PREPARATION. Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Kern Water Bank Conservation and Storage Project

Appendix J. Existing Efforts for Identifying Multi-Benefit Projects

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES BUTTE SINK SUBINVENTORY UNIT

s. w. Wolff T.A. Wesche W.A. Hubert

Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report

Chapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team

A Case Study: Imperial Valley, California

MEMORANDUM. FROM: Jordan Kear, P.G., C.Hg. KG

Groundwater Status Report

Section V: Water Accounting and Water Supply Reliability

MENDOCINO WATER RESOURCES AND WATER CONSERVATION

Butte County Water and Resource Conservation

General Groundwater Concepts

STORMWATER HARVESTING FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES BUTTE SINK SUBINVENTORY UNIT. Butte County Water Advisory Committee Member Gary Kerhoulas

AMENDMENT TO THE REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TO INCLUDE THE STEAD / LEMMON VALLEY WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PLAN

EL PASO COUNTY WATER REPORT

CALSIM II Sacramento River Basin Hydrology Enhancements

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

Public Scoping Meetings

WATER 101. Chris Treese. May 26, 2015 Grand County State of the River

Section V: Water Accounting and Water Supply Reliability

Section 8 Stevinson Water District Study Area

Water Banking Projects Update for Municipal Water District of Orange County

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES BUTTE SUBINVENTORY UNIT. Butte County Water Advisory Committee Member Mark Orme

Managed Groundwater Recharge to Support Sustainable Water Management. A Sacramento Valley Perspective November 8, 2017

Fillmore One to seven million acre-feet in storage depending on calculation assumption; surface area is 20,100 acres.

In support of an alternative water supply

Plans and Goals for 2016

Dry Creek Flood Control Improvement Project

Groundwater Recharge: A Role for Almonds? December 9, 2015

Report Documenting the Reasonableness of the Conjunctive Use Benefit of Surface Water and Recycled Water to Groundwater Customers

CFWI STORMWATER SUBTEAM PROJECTS REPORT. Steering Committee Meeting

Rio Grande Project Operating Agreement: Supplemental Environmental Assessment

Chapter 6 Water Resources

Raw water sources, facilities, and infrastructure

Annex F PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

The Nature Conservancy Cosumnes River Preserve Franklin Boulevard Galt CA 95632

6.6 WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY

EASTERN GOLETA VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN D. WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. Land Use and Development Policies and Implementation Strategies

Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report

Investigation Highlights

Colorado River Challenges Impacts to Southern Arizona

SACOG Board of Directors

Nothing is more useful than water, but it will purchase scarce anything; scarce anything can be had in exchange for it. Adam Smith, The Wealth of

NGWA INFORMATION BRIEF

TRUCKEE BASIN STUDY. Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region. Truckee Meadows Water Authority. April 15, 2015 Reno, NV BOARD Agenda Item 6

4. Present Activities and Roles

System-Wide Investigation of Central Valley Conjunctive Water Management Opportunities

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Figure 1 Kings Basin

Santa Barbara County Region

By Kimberly D. Peterson. Rob Van Kirk, Brian Apple, Brad Finney

Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project Relicensing

TAUSSIG. & Associates, Inc. DAVID. Public Finance Facilities Planning Urban Economics CAPACITY FEE STUDY FOR SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY

Effluent Disposal Feasibility Alternatives Study of Morro Valley

Transcription:

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 11 Divert Water from Miocene and Hendricks Canal to Supply the Ridge This option would use water from the Miocene Canal and/or Hendricks Canal for municipal supplies in Paradise and Del Oro. Paradise Ridge includes the City of Paradise and surrounding developments. Paradise Irrigation District (PID) and Del Oro Water Company (Del Oro) serve water to this area. Based on past reports, the supplies for PID and Del Oro are vulnerable during dry years and additional water supplies are needed for the area's growing population. The Miocene Canal is operated by PG&E and runs from a diversion on the West Branch of the Feather River to a small lake near Lake Oroville. Flows in the canal is 50 cfs through most of the year except between August and November, when flows are reduced to 30 cfs. The canal's upper reach runs from the diversion to Kunkle Reservoir and the lower reach runs from the reservoir to a small lake near Lake Oroville. Water in the canal is owned by PG&E and is sold to small diverters along the canal; diversions occur at various locations in the middle and lower reaches to irrigate orchards and for other land uses. Irrigation tail water flows into a number of creeks in the area. Water from the canal is also used to supplement municipal supplies in Oroville. The Hendricks canal is operated by PG&E and runs from a diversion on the West Branch of the Feather River to De Sabla Reservoir, where water is used to generate power and is then released into Butte Creek. Its maximum flow is 120 cfs, and its average flow is 41 cfs. PG&E's water rights to water flowing in Hendricks canal are a 'use' right and is not consumptive; the water in the canal and in Butte Creek is fully appropriated downstream. Preliminary investigation reveals that both canals have capacity to transmit 2.5 cfs to Paradise Ridge and still meet demands of other diverters along the canals. Removal of more than 2.5 cfs of water from the canals would require locating replacement water or it would cause deliveries of water to downstream users to be reduced. See next page

Potential Benefits Provides municipal water supply to Paradise and Del Oro. Would provide water from the canals that is (and is perceived by residents to be) high quality drinking water. Would use part of Butte County's State Water Project water allocation and provides water to users that are likely to be able and willing to pay the cost. This option could eliminate the need for a long pipeline from Lake Oroville. Current users and appropriation of the Miocene canal are not well defined. Diversions over 2.5 cfs for municipal use could create flow reductions in the upper reach of the Miocene Canal could cause a loss of power production in Lime Saddle Powerhouse.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 12 The Paradise and Del Oro areas currently produce most of their municipal supplies from Little Butte Creek surface water diversions and groundwater pumping, respectively. Improved water supply reliability is an objective of water purveyors serving customers on the Ridge. Groundwater production capacity is generally limited from the hard rock aquifer. Surface water supply and year-to-year carryover storage are affected by hydrologic conditions. This option would increase Ridgearea water supply reliability by developing an alternative water supply source. Under this option, water would be pumped from the Lime Saddle Marina area on Lake Oroville to supply municipal needs in Paradise and Del Oro. An existing water intake at Lake Oroville and treatment plant at Lime Saddle could be utilized for this option. The County's State Water Project (SWP) entitlement water would be used as the authority for a diversion to the Ridge. Build the Lime Saddle Pipeline to Deliver Water to the Ridge A CEQA study is underway for two potential phases of this option. Phase I is designed deliver water from the Lime Saddle Marina to the upper elevation of Del Oro Water Company's (DOWC) Lime Saddle district, near the boundary with Paradise Irrigation District (PID). The system capacity would be 850 gpm. Facilities planned in Phase I include an additional lake intake and pump, expansion of the existing Lime Saddle Water Treatment Plant, approximately 13,500 feet of 10 or 12-inch pipe, and installation of new storage tanks. Phase II would expand the delivery system north through PID to DOWC service areas north of PID, including the Paradise Pines and Magalia districts. See next page

Potential Benefits Improved water supply reliability for Ridge water customers. High quality water from Lake Oroville delivered to Paradise and Del Oro. Partial use of Butte County's SWP water allocation. The public perceives that supply water from the Lime Saddle Marina is polluted with methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), a gasoline oxidant. Removal of water from Lake Oroville will slightly decrease the potential for power production in the Lake Oroville Powerhouse. Construction of pipeline may have environmental impacts.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 13 Strengthen Magalia Dam to Increase Storage Capacity This option would strengthen Magalia Dam to increase the dam's factor of safety, allowing for use of the total design storage capacity of Magalia Reservoir. Implementation of this option would increase the storage capacity of Magalia Reservoir from 800 acre-feet to 2,500 acre-feet, resulting in the ability to store up to 1,700 additional acre-feet in Magalia Reservoir. The additional storage capacity would provide carry-over storage from year-to-year to improve water supply reliability on the Ridge, where a significant potential for water shortage exists during multi-year drought. This option is included in Paradise Irrigation District's (PID) current evaluation of water supply alternatives. PID has water rights to 18,300 acre-feet of water from Little Butte Creek. PID has a year-round right to divert 9,800 acre-feet of water to storage and an additional right to 8,500 acre-feet of water that can be diverted to storage during October-May. In 1996, seismic concerns associated with Magalia Dam forced PID to keep water levels below the maximum capacity of Magalia Reservoir, effectively reducing the storage capacity from 2,500 acre-feet to approximately 800 acre-feet. The State Division of Safety of Dams did not approve a recent request to increase the allowable water surface elevation by 10 feet, based on a recent study that reevaluated the dam's seismic factor of safety. Potential Benefits: Full use of Magalia Reservoir storage capacity. Improved water supply reliability on the Ridge during drought. Widening of the Skyway road over Magalia Dam would be completed concurrently. Transportation funding could support option implementation. Filling Magalia Reservoir will reduce energy use by creating a reduction in pumping from Magalia Reservoir. Increased storage along little Butte Creek could be used to augment flows in Butte Creek during critical periods. : Maximum reduced downstream flow of 1,700 acrefeet/year during spring, but PID has an established right to this water.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 14 In this option, Paradise Irrigation District (PID) would raise Paradise Dam approximately 22 feet to increase the storage capacity from the current 11,497 acre-feet to approximately 17,200 acre-feet. Under the maximum raise option, PID would maintain the storage capacity of Magalia Reservoir at the current 800 acre-feet, resulting in a combined storage capacity of approximately 18,000 acre-feet. The additional storage capacity would provide carry-over storage from year-to-year to improve water supply reliability on the Ridge, where a significant potential for water shortage exists during multi-year drought. PID has water rights to 18,300 acre-feet of water from Little Butte Creek. PID has a year-round right to divert 9,800 acre-feet of water to storage and an additional right to 8,500 acre-feet of water that can be diverted to storage during October-May. The 22-foot raise would represent the maximum feasible raise. Alternatives with a smaller raise are also being considered as part of a current evaluation of water supply alternatives. Raise Paradise Dam to Increase Storage Capacity Potential Benefits: Improved supply reliability on the Ridge. Carry-over water storage capacity. High construction cost. : Increased footprint of reservoir. Potential to participate in Butte Creek flow augmentation in some years. Increased storage allows for other options to use the County's SWP allocation to fill the reservoir to capacity. Increased storage along little Butte Creek could be used to augment flows in Butte Creek during critical periods.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 15 Any combination of groundwater recharge possibilities, coupled with recovery options over a time frame, falls under the category of conjunctive management, which is an option for Butte County. Conjunctive management plans would identify potential sources for recharge, areas of recharge, uses of recovered water, an operational cycle of the plan, and institutional arrangements. Example plan components could be: Recharge: Methods and locations to put water into a groundwater aquifer. Example practices include irrigation with surface water instead of groundwater, diversion of floodwater to infiltration basins, or idling fields, creating in-lieu recharge. Recharge areas are locations where water can be applied to the ground for percolation into the aquifer. One such location is east of Highway 99 south of Chico. Recovery: Practices for taking water out of storage. Groundwater recovered as part of a conjunctive management plan could be recovered through groundwater extraction for agricultural, urban, or environmental purposes within the county, or transferred outside the county for use elsewhere. Operational Cycle: A description of operational practices that details the length of time between recharge and recovery. Implement a Conjunctive Management Plan Institutional Arrangements: A description of how the plan will work within the regulatory and legal framework. A description of the roles and responsibilities of the entities involved. A recounting of applicable regulations and laws. Any special constraints or criteria that affect plan implementation. See next page

Potential Benefits Potential economic and environmental benefits, including income to the county area through sale of water through transfers and environmental enhancement through creation of wetlands in recharge areas. Increased storage of water. Increased reliability and sustainability of existing groundwater supplies. Provide a beneficial use for State Water Project water allocated to Butte County. Shallow depth of existing wells limits potential operating range of aquifer. Would require significant effort to coordinate programs. Programs could conflict. Management authority may be lacking or conflicting. Groundwater does not follow geopolitical boundaries. Recovery could draw aquifer low enough to affect water users. Public may be concerned that using conjunctive management to supply non-overlying users would negatively affect in-county users.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 16 This option would set up a grant or loan program to identify and deepen shallow wells in Butte County. During the 1992 drought, areas in the County experienced lowered groundwater levels, and there were reports of dry wells. The Sacramento Valley portion of Butte County has 5,484 domestic wells and 2,198 irrigation wells. Currently, 50 percent of domestic wells are installed to a depth of 120 feet or less, and 50 percent of irrigation wells are installed to a depth of 275 feet or less. As part of this option, wells depths would be increased between 100 and 300 feet. This option would help ensure future groundwater supplies, in that deeper wells could operate even if groundwater levels varied. Identify and Deepen Shallow Groundwater Wells Potential Benefits Deeper wells would provide protection against changes in groundwater levels resulting from natural causes. Deeper wells would provide protection against changes in groundwater levels resulting from groundwater pumping. It may be difficult to assess which groundwater wells to deepen.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 17 Build a Canal to Deliver Surface Water to Cherokee and Esquon This option would deliver water via a canal from the Thermalito Forebay as far north as Hamlin Slough. The canal would be built along an old abandoned railway, and could act as a conduit for the County's allocation of State Water Project water, settlement contracted water, other surplus water, possibly purchased from Western Canal, and any purchased water from the Thermalito Forebay. The railway would provide a clear pathway for the canal without dividing existing farms. Water delivered by the canal could be used for irrigation needs in the summer, decomposition water in the fall, and for the creation of habitat, allowing for direct recharge and in-lieu recharge. Many growers are concerned about using surface water to irrigate orchard crops. Surface water in nearly all creeks, streams, and rivers in Butte County is known to carry spores of the phytophthora fungus. Phytophthora is a water mold that requires specific conditions, such as wet, saturated soils, standing water around tree trunks, or trunks wetted frequently, to become a disease that infects trees and other plants. Phytophthora is known to damage the roots of orchard trees, mainly almonds and walnuts. Potential Benefits Direct groundwater recharge in the shallow aquifer and into the deeper lower Tuscan Formation. This would allow for the storage and withdrawal of more water within the basin than would be possible with only natural recharge. Surface water deliveries to relieve drought issues in the Cherokee Strip area and enhance supplies for portions of the Western Canal and Esquon areas. Reduction of potential impacts from water replacement pumping in areas west and southwest of the Cherokee area. Beneficial use of State Water Project water allocated to Butte County. Creation of habitat on land that is currently marginal graze land. Cost of SWP water at roughly $27 per acre-foot could be a higher cost than local users would be willing to pay. Canal construction could have environmental impacts, including habitat fragmentation and potential loss of vernal pools. Surface water use in orchards could require dual irrigation systems for frost protection needs. Almond orchard owners may not want surface water because of Phytophthora, a root fungus that may be transmitted by surface water.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 18 Build the Oro-Chico Conduit for In-Lieu and Direct Recharge in Cherokee and Esquon The Oro-Chico Conduit would convey water for groundwater recharge in a new canal running north from Thermalito Forebay to an area south of Chico. This canal would deliver water for direct recharge and for irrigation use, crossing numerous small ephemeral streams, into which water from the Forebay could be released. This project would supply surface water to the Cherokee Strip area and the portion of the Western Canal Water District (WCWD) up gradient from the WCWD canal. Percolation in this area would recharge the lower Tuscan Formation. Turnouts into the stream channels would provide recharge water during spring in near average runoff years and occasionally during the fall in extremely high rainfall years (Butte County, 1996). This option would help ensure future water supplies, improve water management, and could enhance biological resources with the creation of wetlands. A pilot program is being planned by the California Department of Water Resources, Northern District to gather recharge information. Potential Benefits Groundwater recharge in the shallow aquifer and into the deeper lower Tuscan Formation. This would allow for the storage and withdrawal of more water within the basin than would be possible with only natural recharge. Increase in groundwater yield through conjunctive use operations. Relief of drought issues in the Cherokee Strip area and enhancement of supplies for portions of the Western Canal and Esquon areas. Beneficial use for State Water Project water allocated to Butte County. The project would be expensive and ranges in capital cost from $33 million to $74 million, estimated in 1996. Canal construction could have environmental impacts, including habitat fragmentation and potential loss of vernal pools. Only a portion of the water released into the streams would recharge the aquifer. The remaining water would run into the Sacramento River and leave the County. Current recharge to the Lower Tuscan from streams is not well understood.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 19 Construct Groundwater Recharge Basins This option would create groundwater recharge basins, which are large, shallow ponds that contain water while it percolates into the groundwater aquifer. These basins would be constructed along the eastern portion of the valley on the recharge areas for the lower Tuscan formation (see Option 24 for a figure of these areas). Recharge basins would capture local runoff and excess flows for percolation, but the primary source of water would be the County's unused SWP allocation and some flood flows available during flood releases from Lake Oroville. A canal or pipeline would be needed to convey water from Lake Oroville to the basins. The recharge basins would be less than five feet deep, and could provide short-term storage for water supply. If the basins are sited on a sloped area, the area would need to be leveled for better water storage. Percolation rates vary, but 0.5 feet per day is a reasonable approximation for the Central Valley. Using this estimate, the size of the recharge basins would need to be at least 150 acres to allow recharge of the entire SWP allocation. More land would be needed to capture local runoff and excess flows. A potential sub-option would be to construct the recharge basins in areas that would benefit habitat, such as wetlands, grassland, or wet meadows, in the eastern portion of the valley in Butte County. The functions of the groundwater recharge basins would be met, but this sub-option would include recharge designs that incorporate areas that benefit local plant and animal species. This option could have some funding available from Proposition 50. Potential Benefits Recharge of groundwater, depending on the location of the ponds, potentially to the deep aquifer in the lower Tuscan. Increased recharge allowing flexibility in local conjunctive management. Beneficial use for State Water Project water allocated to Butte County. Potential impacts to vernal pools and sensitive species. Land intensive. Requires conveyance of surface water.

Integrated Water Resources Plan Option 20 Investigate a Storage Reservoir in Table Mountain's Former Basalt Mine This option would investigate construction of a 5 acre, 140-foot deep lake on Table Mountain following the completion of mining activities. Martin Marietta Mining Company has mining rights to basalt in Coal Canyon, a Table Mountain drainage. Mining of basalt in Coal Canyon would result in impacts to riparian habitat. Therefore, rather than mining Coal Canyon, Martin Marietta may mine a 5 acre area on top of Table Mountain. Following mining, the remaining pit is projected to have a 700 acre-foot capacity. The pit could potentially be filled by runoff from Table Mountain. Another lake on Table Mountain, Chaffin Lake, relies solely on rain runoff for a water source and is used to irrigate local orchards. Runoff from Table Mountain to the potential mine site is not quantified. It is not known if an adequate volume of runoff would be available to fill the lake in most years. The water stored in the new lake would potentially be used for public good. Discussions are ongoing with Martin Marietta. Potential Benefits Creation of 700 acre-ft of storage. Reduction of impacts to riparian habitat due to mining. The source of water for the reservoir is not well described, could be inadequate, and could be under another landowner's water right.