Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

Similar documents
Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

Superpave Volumetric Mix Design

VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) WAQTC TM 13

Volumetric Analysis-Based Comparison between Superpave and Marshall Mix Design Procedures

Marshal Mix Design. Compacted Specimen Asphalt Content Loose Specimen

5- Superpave. Asphalt Concrete Mix Design

Investigation of synergistic efforts of warm mix asphalt and high fractionated reclaimed asphalt for safe, environmentally sustainable highway

Asphalt Concrete Properties

Superpave Mix Design

4- High-Type Bituminous Pavements

3- Highway Materials Aggregates

Aggregate Testing Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

INVESTIGATION OF THE DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES USING MINNESOTA TACONITE ROCK

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

ASPHALT WAQTC WAQTC TM 13 (12)

Mix Design & Production Control Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

Asphalt Rubber Mixture Design. ADOT s AR-ACFC and ARAC

AUTOMATION OF THE SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN PROCESS FOR THE WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS. John P. Zaniewski, Ph.D. Martin Padula

Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Performance with SUPERPAVE

2005 Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA)

Asphalt Mixes and Design

BACKGROUND Flexible Pavements Part of a Layered/Composite System Elastic Behavior 2

MARSHALL MIX DESIGN PROJECT. [2 nd semester 1433H] CE432-Highway Engineering LABORATORY

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

Chapter 6 Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Asphalt 104: An Introduction to Hot Mix Asphalt Materials. -Part II- Mix Design. Scott Shuler CSU

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

INTRODUCTION TO ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR MANAGERS AND OWNERS ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

STUDY QUESTION ANSWERS

12/9/14. HMA Mix Design. Asphalt Mix Design. Volumetrics. HMA Mix Characteristics

Asphalt Concrete Properties

SECTION 329 PLANT MIXED SEAL COAT CONSTRUCTION

INDIANA. So how do you make hot mix asphalt? Basics of HMA Pavement Performance. Basics of a Good Road Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Materials Selection

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 874 ULTRATHINBONDED ASPHALT CONCRETE. April 20, 2007

100 Aggregate Size Definitions Nominal Maximum Agg ggreg re ate Size one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10% Maximum

Hot Mix Testing Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Aggregate Specifications

CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN

Comparison of 19 mm Superpave and Marshall Base II Mixes in West Virginia. John P. Zaniewski, Ph.D. Vasavi Kanneganti

MODOT Field Office UPDATE

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF V.M.A. IN COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Seattle Public Utilities Materials Laboratory

SECTION 116 ASPHALT CONCRETE

Superpave Design Guidelines for Using Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Asphalt Shingles

Hot Mix Testing Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

NCAT Report MOISTURE RESISTANCE OF SULFUR-MODIFIED WARM MIX. Nam Tran Adam J. Taylor. August 2011

ROARING FORK & EAGLE VALLEY (RFEV) SECTION 4 ASPHALT MIXTURE REQUIRMENTS

Overview. Mix Design with High RAP Contents SEAUPG 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. December 7, 2010

Making the Grade How Do Municipal Marshall Mixes Fare Under Superpave Specifications?

EVALUATION OF TEST METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF AGGREGATE SPECIFIC GRAVITY

Classroom Instructors: Mitch Forst (MF), Larry Shively (LS), Cliff Ursich (CU), Dave Powers (DP).

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

NCAT Report 17-03R EFFECT OF FLAT AND ELONGATED AGGREGATE ON STONE MATRIX ASPHALT PERFORMANCE. By Donald E. Watson Grant Julian

Impacts of WMA additives on rutting resistance and moisture susceptibility

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS BASES AND SURFACES

Comparison of Length Changes, Flexural Strengths and Compressive Strengths. Between Concrete Made with Rounded Gravel

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Chapter Eight. Minnesota Mix Specifications, Methods & Quality Control

A Study On Marshall Stability Properties Of Warm Mix Asphalt Using Zycotherm A Chemical Additive

Provide graded aggregate for use in bituminous mixtures.

Determination of the acceptable range of mixing and compaction temperatures for modified asphalt mixture with styrene butadine styrene (SBS)

PAVETEX Engineering, LLC

DESIGNING, PRODUCING, AND CONSTRUCTING FINE-GRADED HOT MIX ASPHALT ON ILLINOIS ROADWAYS

Topics. Let s talk about. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials and Mix Design. Traffic Loading (ESALs) Definitions 7/6/2010

HMA Economics 101. Bailey Method for Achieving Volumetrics and HMA Compactability ASPHALT INSTITUTE

2501 PART V SECTION 2501 PART V

DIVISION 2500 MISCELLANEOUS METHODS OF TEST

Acceptance Testing and Variability Impacts on Construction Operation

Using RAP in the Superpave Mix Design System

MIX DESIGN SCHOOL DAY 1. Time Topic Presenter

Standard Test Procedures Manual

GeoTesting Express, Inc.

Update on WMA Lab Foaming Research. Ala R. Abbas, Ph.D. Ayman W. Ali, M.Sc. Department of Civil Engineering The University of Akron

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

Constructing and teaching a new asphalt laboratory for the engineering department at the University of Tennessee at Martin

Update on PennDOT Bulletin 27

Importance of identifying trends. Help identify erroneous test results. Quality of pavement Encourage paying attention to test results.

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Western Canada Pavement Workshop February 1, 2011 PAVING MATERIALS. Past, Present and Future. Gerry Huber Heritage Research Group Indianapolis, IN

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR FURNISHING AND PLACING MARSHALL HOT MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE (WITH SAMPLING BEHIND THE PAVER)

SECTION 328 QUIET ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT

FHWA-Western Federal Lands Highway Division

High Air Void Designed Mixes: Update. Rebecca McDaniel Missouri Asphalt Conference 11/28/17

COMPARISON OF MARSHALL AND SUPERPAVE DESIGN METHODS, EVALUATION OF WHEEL TRACKING TEST OF ASPHALT MIXTURES DESIGNED BY BOTH METHODS

Good Performing RAP/RAS mixes. Brian Prowell, PhD, PE

Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Permeable Friction Course (PFC) Mixtures are Different!

FAA s Mixture Specifications

Mix Optimization Fundamentals W ORLD OF A SPHALT N ASHVILLE, TENNESSEE M ARCH 24, 2016 S HANE B UCHANAN, OLDCASTLE M ATERIALS

Designing Open-Graded Mixes

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

POROUS PAVEMENTS. - Advantage Asphalt - APWA Spring Conference April 2016

Transcription:

Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method Date: January 18, 2013 Project No: VB011413-104 Mix Type/Specification: APWA Type 4-01 For: Mr. Leland Smith Vance Brothers, Inc. 5201 Brighton Ave. Kansas City, MO 64130

Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design APWA Type 4-01 Objective Perform a Marshall Mix Design per the Asphalt Institute MS-2 Manual and AASHTO test methods conforming to the Kansas City Metropolitan Chapter of the American Public Works Association, 2001 Edition, APWA Type 4-01 specification (50 compaction blows per face). Materials Material Source Date Received 3/8 Crushed Limestone Quality Quarry, KCMO January 7, 2013 Limestone Screenings Quality Quarry, KCMO January 7, 2013 River Sand Mid America Sand Co., KCMO January 7, 2013 PG 64-22 Asphalt Conoco Phillips, Wood River, IL December 6, 2012 Discussion: Mix Design Project VB 011413-104 The mix design was optimized using four asphalt contents (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 AC). The table below lists the mix properties at the optimum asphalt content chosen (5.1% AC). The mixing temperature range is 305 to 315 F and the compaction temperature range is 285 to 295 F. As with any mix, compaction and compaction temperatures should be determined by roller test patterns and density measurements. These test results apply only to the laboratory samples as received. Adjustments may be necessary in the plant/field due to raw material variation, conditions in the plant/field, etc. Mix design tables and graphs are on pages 2 5. Property APWA 3-01 Specification Mix Properties Optimum AC Content (%) 5.0 7.5 5.1 +/- 0.1 Bulk Gravity of Mix (G mb ) NA 2.364 Mix Density (lbs/ft 3 ) NA 147.5 % Air Voids 3-5 3.9 % VMA NA (AI MS-2: 14 min.) 12.4 % Voids Filled NA (AI MS-2: 65-78) 68.8 Dust Proportion NA (AI MS-2: 0.6-1.2) 1.95 Stability (lbs) 1,500 min. 4,300 Flow (0.01") 8-16 14 Note: NA = Not Applicable - AI MS-2 Specifications are provided for information only. Reviewed by: Date: January 18, 2013 Martin R. Burrow Technical Director, Vance Brothers Page 1 of 5

Percent Passing Project VB011413-104 cont d. Project Number : VB011413-104 Project Location : Vance Brothers Kansas City Date : 1/14/2013 Material Description Aggregate 1 = Quality 3/8" Aggregate 2 = Quality Lime Aggregate 3 = MAS Asphalt Sand Aggregate 4 = Aggregate 5 = Aggregate 6 = Aggregate 7 = Aggregate 8 = Enter Estimated Binder % Aggregate 9 = Estimated Mix Cost $ - Aggregate10 = Enter Aggregate Material Data in this Table Marshall Mix Design Program Enter Nominal Maximum Size of the Mixture mm Stockpile Percentage Aggregate Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sieve Size 45% 40% 15% Specifications mm US Agg.1 Agg.2 Agg.3 Agg.4 Agg.5 Agg.6 Agg.7 Agg.8 Agg.9 Agg.10 Composite Min. Max. 50 2" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100 37.5 1 1/2" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100 25 1" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100 19 3/4" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100 12.5 1/2" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100 9.5 3/8" 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 85 100 4.75 #4 18.8 99.1 99.4 63.0 55 75 2.36 #8 2.2 66.5 96.1 42.0 39 50 1.18 #16 2.2 43.4 90.3 31.9 27 38 0.6 #30 2.0 30.7 81.0 25.3 19 30 0.3 #50 1.9 23.4 56.7 18.7 11 23 0.15 #100 1.7 19.0 8.2 9.6 6 16 0.075 #200 1.5 16.3 0.4 7.3 4.0 10.0 100 0.45th POWER GRADATION CHART 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.075 0.3 0.6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19 25 37.5 50 Sieve Size (mm) Page 2 of 5

Project VB011413-104 cont d. Project Number : VB011413-104 Project Location : Vance Brothers Kansas City Marshall Mix Design Program 45% Aggr.1 = Quality 3/8" Aggr.6 = 40% Aggr.2 = Quality Lime Aggr.7 = 15% Aggr.3 = MAS Asphalt Sand Aggr.8 = Aggr.4 = Aggr.9 = Aggr.5 = Aggr.10 = Pb 5.00% Gmm 2.464 CAA Test FAA Test Spec. 1 Spec. 2 Gb 1.035 Weight of 1- Frac Face sample percent 1 or more FF #DIV/0! Volume of cylinder (cm 3 ) Calculate Gse 2.65741 Weight of 2- Frac Face sample percent 2 or more FF #DIV/0! Wt. of cylinder (g) Calculate Pba 1.45 Total dry weight of sample Wt. of cylinder + Sample (g) Gsb of fine aggregate 2.535 2.535 Gsb Coarse Sample Percent uncompacted voids #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Sand Equiv. Test Sand Rdg. Clay Rdg. S.E. Spec. # Dry Wt. Sub. Wt SSD Wt. Gsb Gsa Abs Ave. % Uncompacted Voids #DIV/0! Reading #1 ###### 1 2012.5 1272.2 2043.5 2.609 2.718 1.54% Reading #2 ###### 2 2012.5 1272.2 2043.5 2.609 2.718 1.54% Flat and Elongated Particles Reading #3 ###### Average 2.609 2.718 1.54% Total weight of dry sample Average ###### Gsb Fine Sample Dry wt. of elongated particles Oven Dry Flask FL+H20 % of Elong. Particles #DIV/0! G mm @ 5.00% Apshalt Binder Spec. # Sp. In Air + H 20 + Spec. Gsb Gsa Abs Specimen Sample Sample & Bowl in Sample Ave. 1 488.7 1261.9 1569.1 2.535 2.693 2.31% Combined Gsb = 2.562 No. in air Bowl in H 2O H20 in H20 Gmm Gmm 2 488.7 1261.9 1569.1 2.535 2.693 2.31% Combined Gsa = 2.702 1 1500.0 6349.6 5459.0 890.6 2.461 2.464 Average 2.535 2.693 2.31% Comb. H2O Abs. = 1.95% 2 1500.0 6351.0 5459.0 892.0 2.467 Data Entry SPEC. DRY SUB SSD Ave. Volumetric Data Ave. Corr. Corr. Ave. NO. Pb WT. WT. WT. Gmb Gmb Gmm Va VMA VFA Pbe DP Stab. Stab. Vol. Factor Stab Flow Flow 1A 4.5% 1195.4 692.2 1204.0 2.336 4012 11.0 1B 4.5% 1193.2 689.0 1202.2 2.325 2.331 2.482 6.08% 13.09 53.54 3.11 2.33 3860 4000 511 1.00 4000 12.0 1C 4.5% 1186.0 686.2 1194.5 2.333 4127 11.0 11.3 2A 5.0% 1197.2 692.5 1200.7 2.356 4160 14.0 2B 5.0% 1193.6 690.4 1197.5 2.354 2.356 2.464 4.38% 12.62 65.28 3.62 2.00 4247 4198 507 1.04 4366 14.0 13.7 2C 5.0% 1197.6 693.1 1200.7 2.359 4186 13.0 3A 5.5% 1193.4 696.7 1194.2 2.399 3825 15.0 3B 5.5% 1191.0 696.0 1192.0 2.401 2.398 2.446 1.99% 11.55 82.81 4.13 1.76 3926 3872 497 1.04 4027 16.0 3C 5.5% 1190.9 694.2 1191.7 2.394 3866 15.0 4A 6.0% 1188.3 694.5 1188.7 2.404 3226 18.0 4B 6.0% 1198.5 700.9 1199.0 2.406 2.403 2.429 1.06% 11.82 91.04 4.63 1.57 3556 3401 494 1.09 3707 19.0 4C 6.0% 1177.0 687.3 1177.9 2.399 3420 19.0 15.3 18.7 5A 5B 5C Page 3 of 5

lbs. (N) 0.01 in. (0.25 mm) % Voids filled with Asphalt Dust Proportion % Air Voids % Voids in the Mineral Aggregate Project VB011413-104 cont d. Va 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% VMA 14.0 13.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 100 VFA 2.5 DP 90 2.0 80 70 60 50 1.5 1.0 0.5 40 0.0 Stability Flow ASPHALT INSTITUTE 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 ASPHALT 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 Page 4 of 5

Project VB011413-104 cont d. Page 5 of 5