Update on the IVDR. Sue Spencer

Similar documents
Changes to the Regulation of IVDs in Europe. Copyright 2012 BSI. All rights reserved.

What you need to know about the new European IVD Regulation

IVD Regulation What you need to know. Erica Conway 5 th May 2017

IVD Regulation Update

Classification under the IVD Regulation

IVDR Update Get Ready for the Ride. MassMEDIC World MedTech Regulatory Update

Ready or Not: The New Medical Device Regulations Are Here!

Conformity Assessment of Medical Devices Under The New MDR

Flexible, robust solutions from BSI. An In Vitro Diagnostic Notified Body. Expertise and experience. IVD regulatory solutions

Impact of the IVD Regulations. Barbara Fallowfield Managing Director

IVD Regulation 2017/746

Medical Device Regulatory Framework 9 SEPTEMBER 2015 FUNDISA CONFERENCE JANE ROGERS

Bridging gaps: medical device directive vs regulation. Geert Corstens 1 November 2018

IVDR Workshop Diagnostik Akademie, Sven Hoffmann Global Head of Technical Competence Center IVD TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH

Due diligence in the European medical devices industry

Dr. Wim Huisman Chair Committee Quality and Regulations EFLM Bergen Norway, 14 March 2017

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force (revision of GHTF/SG1/N29:2005)

An introductory guide to the medical device regulation (MDR) and the in vitro diagnostic medical device regulation (IVDR)

ASQ Tappan Zee Section Medical Devices, New Regulations and Standards. 26 th September / V. Fischer / Rev. 01

FINAL DOCUMENT. Definition of the Terms Medical Device and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Device. Work Group 1: Pre-market: General MD

The New EU IVDR. Overview of the Main Changes & Clinical Data Requirements. Advance Regulatory Consulting Ltd.

Med-Info. Directive 98/79/EC on in-vitro diagnostic medical devices. TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CLASS I MEDICAL DEVICES

The EU s In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) Regulation:

Developing a Companion Diagnostics in parallel to a medicinal product Legal and Regulatory requirements in Europe and in the US

IVDR Breakout. Copyright 2017 BSI. All rights reserved.

Companion Diagnostics (CDx) and personalized Medicine

Companion diagnostics and the IVD Directive 98/79/EC + revision

Regulation of software a medical device

HOW TO APPLY FOR MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRATION UNDER MEDICAL DEVICE ACT 2012 (ACT 737)

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES. IVD GUIDANCE : Research Use Only products A GUIDE FOR MANUFACTURERS AND NOTIFIED BODIES

Medical Device Regulatory Roadmap SAMED Conference 2-3 December 2015

Are Pharmaco- and Medical Device Vigilance the same?

Medical Device Regulatory Roadmap SAMED Conference 2-3 December 2015

Regulatory Affairs in Medical Technology

The challenges of software medical device regulation.

Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) Readiness Review

Update on Recast of IVD Directive

Recommendations on Medical Device and IVD Field Safety Corrective Actions and Recalls using Unique Device Identifiers & GS1 Standards

Update on Regulatory Environment- Europe Experience with 2007/47/EC M5 & Discussions on Possible Recast of EU Medical Device Regulations

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CUSTOM-MADE MEDICAL DEVICES

ANNEX 2 Risk Classification Rules for Medical Devices other than in-vitro diagnostic products

DRUG DRAFT GUIDELINE FOR REGISTRATION OF MEDICAL DEVICES FOR HUMAN USE IN UGANDA, SEPTEMBER 2009

BSI Audits for MDR Certification

Interface between medicinal product and medical devices development - Update on EMA implementation of the new medical devices legislation

Manufacturers of in vitro Diagnostic

Impact of the MD/IVD Regulations on Quality Management Systems

Manufacturers of In-Vitro Diagnostic

Verification of Manufactured Products for the IVD Directive

QMS Aspects of the MDR (& IVDR)

Manufacturers. Factsheet for. of Medical Devices. Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) background. Act now to be ready on time!

Guide to the in-vitro diagnostic medical devices legislation

Manufacturers. Factsheet for. of Medical Devices. Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) background. Act now to be ready on time!

TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Implications of the new MDR from a Product Testing and Certification Perspective

Regulatory Framework for Medical Device

The New EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) An Active Device Lifecycle Approach Implementation and Remediation Activities

Short intro to the MDR & IVDR (C)2018 QAdvis AB

Recast Medical Device directives Impacts on materiovigilance

Guidance on legislation. Clinical investigations of medical devices guidance for investigators

Medical Devices. LITHUANIA LAWIN Lideika, Petrauskas, Valiunas ir partneriai

Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002

Medical Device Regulation Overview

New European Rules governing medical devices vigilance and combination products. Lincoln Tsang May 2008

Support for the National Accreditation Centre MOLDAC to successfully undergo the EA peer evaluation process. Twinning Project MD14/ENPI/TR/20

QUESTIONS FOR QUOTING

GENERAL AND ORGANISATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

VIGILANZA E SORVEGLIANZA POST- COMMERCIALIZZAZIONE

Self-Care Medical Devices Framework. Dr. Simone Breitkopf Head HEOR, Governmental and Public Affairs

Guide for Class I Manufacturers on Compliance with European Communities (Medical Devices) Regulations, 1994

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX. on the audits and assessments performed by notified bodies in the field of medical devices

MDR. Device Classification Conformity Assessment Safety & Performance Requirements Technical Documentation

Medical Devices: how interesting they are!

Regulatory Challenges of Combination Products in EU and US. Afternoon seminar, 24 January 2018 by COBIS and IWA Consulting

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

The upcoming EU MDR. Gert Bos. - key changes overview. Executive director & Partner. ..the practical approach

MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (Minzdrav of Russia) Moscow

Technical documentation. Capita Selecta proposed MDR

Introduction to the new regulatory framework for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

Update: Proposed European Medical Device Regulations (MDR) April Monisha Phillips, PhD Global Head, Orthopaedic & Dental Devices

European Medical Device Regulations (MDR): What To Expect

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES

Overview of Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices & IVDs and likely Implementation Roadmap. Jane Rogers SAAPI Conference 13 April 2016

ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL FLOW CYTOMETRY LABORATORY PRACTICE. First Edition Australasian Cytometry Society Laboratory Assessment Document

of 17 October 2001 (Status as of 26 November 2017)

MDR ID: Definition: Applicable:

SOFTWARE APPS AS MEDICAL DEVICES. The Regulatory Landscape 2015 WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER PRODUCED BY MAETRICS

European Regulation of Drug-Device Combinations and the Borderline: Can South Africa learn from international Best Practice?

EU Update Proposed Regulations, Own Brand Labelling, Unannounced Audits

Essential Requirements Straumann Custom-made Dental Restorative Devices According to 93/42/EEC annex I as amended by 2007/47/EC

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process

Perspective: New European IVD Regulations New Concepts for Market Authorizations and Product Launch Schedules

Classification of MDs under the European MDR. Joachim Makowski. Joachim Makowski, MED-RAS GmbH, a partner to confinis ag

EU MDR: Tips for Effectively Addressing the New Requirements

AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL DEVICES GUIDANCE DOCUMENT NUMBER 5. The Declaration of Conformity

Medical Devices: They Matter Too!

PROPOSED FINAL DOCUMENT

UNICEF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAL DEVICES (MD)

ANNEX. CHAPTER I General principles

Guidance on the Information Required for Notified Body Medical Device Personnel Involved in Conformity Assessment

Transcription:

Update on the IVDR Sue Spencer

Caution The new regulations are draft the principles have now been agreed but the Annexes are subject to minor changes Further details will be added later pre and post application through implementing and delegating legislation Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 2

Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 3

Big Issues What and when? Classification Changes to definitions Conformity routes Significant changes Clinical Evidence and Post-market performance follow-up (PMPF) 4

Structure of the IVDR Chapters 10 Articles 90 Annexes 14 Annex I General Safety and Performance Requirements Equivalent to the current essential requirement Broadly similar with additional clarification New sections for software and requirements for use with mobile platforms Requirements for self tests are extended to include near patient testing Annex II Technical documentation Significantly more detail regarding the expectations for technical documentation Annex III Declaration of Conformity Annex IV CE marking Annex V Registration and UDI Annex VI Requirements for Notified Bodies Annex VII Classification Annex VIII Conformity Assessment based on Full QA or Design Examination Annex IX Conformity Assessment based on Type Examination Annex X Conformity Assessment based on Production QA Annex XI Notified Bodies Certificate content Annex XII Clinical Evidence and Post Market Follow up Annex XIII Interventional Clinical Performance Studies Annex XIV Correlation table More detailed & more prescriptive; consistent with the proposed Medical Device Regulation Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 5

Change to the definition of a Medical Device medical device means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, implant, reagent, material or other article, intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination, for human beings for one or more of the specific medical purposes of: diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease, diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or disability, investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological or pathological process or state, providing information by means of in vitro examination of specimens derived from the human body, including organ, blood and tissue donations, and which does not achieve its principal intended action by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, in or on the human body, but which may be assisted in its function by such means. Products specifically intended for the cleaning, disinfection or sterilisation of medical devices and devices for the purpose of control or support of conception shall be considered medical devices. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 6

Change to the definition of an IVD 'in vitro diagnostic medical device means any medical device which is a reagent, reagent product, calibrator, control material, kit, instrument, apparatus, equipment, software or system, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to be used in vitro for the examination of specimens, including blood and tissue donations, derived from the human body, solely or principally for the purpose of providing information: concerning a physiological or pathological process or state; concerning a congenital abnormality (previous draft stated physical or mental impairment) concerning the predisposition to a medical condition or a disease; to determine the safety and compatibility with potential recipients; to predict treatment response or reactions; to define or monitor therapeutic measures. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 7

Current estimation of dates Official Text Published (Mid to end 2016) Adoption (End 2016) Transition Period (5 years) IVDR Enforced (Certificates to IVDD no longer issued all new certificates under IVDR) Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 8

Classification 9

IVD Classification Application of the classification rules shall be governed by the intended purpose, novelty, complexity and inherent risk of the devices. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 10

Classification Class D (Blood screening) Devices intended to be used to detect the presence of, or exposure to, a transmissible agent in blood, blood components, cells, tissues or organs, or in any of their derivatives, in order to assess their suitability for transfusion, transplantation or cell administration. a transmissible agent that causes a life-threatening disease with a high or currently undefined suspected high risk of propagation Devices intended to be used to determine the infectious load of a life-threatening disease where its monitoring is critical in the process of patient management. All assays for the clinical diagnosis and monitoring of infection by HIV 1/2, Hepatitis C virus, Hepatitis B virus and HTLV I/II devices should be classified as class D. Assays for the clinical diagnosis of Hepatitis B virus are taken to include the following infectious disease markers: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B core total antibodies (anti-hbc total) and Hepatitis B virus nucleic acid detection (HBV NAT). Blood grouping ABO, Rhesus (including RHW1), Kell, Kidd and Duffy systems Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 11

Classification Class C Devices intended for a. detecting the presence of, or exposure to, a sexually transmitted agent; b. detecting the presence in cerebrospinal fluid or blood of an infectious agent without a high or suspected high risk of propagation; c. detecting the presence of an infectious agent, if there is a significant risk that an erroneous result would cause death or severe disability to the individual, foetus being tested, or to the individual's offspring; d. pre-natal screening of women in order to determine their immune status towards transmissible agents; e. determining infective disease status or immune status, if there is a risk that an erroneous result would lead to a patient management decision resulting in an imminent life-threatening situation for the patient or for the patient's offspring; Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 12

Classification Class C (Continued) f. Devices intended to be used as companion diagnostics*; or fa Devices intended to be used for disease staging or prognosis if there is a risk that an erroneous result would lead to a patient management decision resulting in a lifethreatening situation for the patient or for the patient's offspring fb Devices intended to be used in screening diagnosis or staging of cancer. g. human genetic testing; h. monitoring of levels of medicinal products, substances or biological components, when there is a risk that an erroneous result will lead to a patient management decision resulting in an imminent life-threatening situation for the patient or for the patient's offspring; i. management of patients suffering from a life-threatening infectious disease or condition; j. screening for congenital disorders in the foetus or embryo Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 13

Classification Class C (Continued) k. screening for congenital disorders in new-born where failure to detect and treat such disorders could lead to life-threatening situations or severe disabilities. Devices intended for self-testing are classified as class C, except those devices from which the result is not determining a medically critical status, or is preliminary and requires follow-up with the appropriate laboratory test in which case they are Class B. devices intended for blood gases and blood glucose determinations for near patient testing are class C. Other devices that are intended for near-patient testing shall be classified in their own right. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 14

Companion Diagnostics New v Old Definition New Proposal from EU Council of Companion Diagnostics 'companion diagnostic' means a device which is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding medicinal product to: identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the medicinal product, or; identify patients likely to be at increased risk for serious adverse reactions as a result of treatment with the medicinal product, or; monitor response to treatment by the medicinal product for the purpose of adjusting treatment to achieve improved safety or effectiveness FDA CDx Guidance on Companion Diagnostics An IVD companion diagnostic device is an IVD device that provides information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product An IVD companion diagnostic device could be essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product to: Identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the therapeutic product Identify patients likely to be at increased risk for serious adverse reactions as a result of treatment with the therapeutic product Monitor response to treatment with the therapeutic product for the purpose of adjusting treatment (e.g., schedule, dose, discontinuation) to achieve improved safety or effectiveness Identify patients in the population for whom the therapeutic product has been adequately studied, and found safe and effective, i.e., there is insufficient information about the safety and effectiveness of the therapeutic product in any other population Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 15

Genetic Tests device for genetic testing means an in vitro diagnostic medical device the purpose of which is to identify a genetic characteristic of a person which is inherited or acquired during prenatal development; New requirement The following devices may only be supplied on a medical prescription: 1) Class D devices; 2) Class C devices in the following categories: (a) devices for genetic testing; (b) companion diagnostics. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 16

Classification Class B Any IVD not listed under Classes D, C or A. Controls without an assigned value. Class A Products for general laboratory use, accessories which possess no critical characteristics, buffer solutions, washing solutions intended by the manufacturer to make them suitable for in vitro diagnostic procedures related to a specific examination Instruments intended specifically for use in IVD procedures. Specimen receptacles. EU quality management system certificates for class A sterile devices shall include a statement that the Notified Body has audited the quality system restricted to the aspects of manufacture concerned with securing and maintaining sterile conditions Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 17

Conformity Routes 18

Conformity Assessment Routes Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 19

Conformity Assessment Routes A B C D EU Declaration of Conformity Annex III Quality Management System Assurance Annex VIII Quality Management System Assurance Annex VIII Type Examination Annex IX (includes Technical Documentation) Quality Management System Assurance Annex VIII Type Examination Annex IX (includes Technical Documentation) Assessment of Technical Documentation for each category of device Annex VIII 6.1 Assessment of Technical Documentation for each generic device class - Annex VIII 6.1 Production Quality Assurance Annex X Assessment of Technical Documentation for each device Annex VIII 6.1 Production Quality Assurance Annex X For Companion Diagnostics CA consultation For Companion Diagnostics CA consultation Batch Verification Batch Verification All technical file reviews will be in depth BUT there is more sampling for D v C v B Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 20

Sampling Class D Assessment of the technical documentation Class C Assessment of the technical documentation of at least one device representative per generic device group Class B Assessment of the technical documentation of at least one representative device for each category of devices Class A Notified Body not required unless sterile In choosing representative sample(s) the notified body shall take into account the guidance developed and published by the MDCG in particular the novelty of the technology, the potential impact on the patient and practice of medicine, similarities in design, technology, manufacturing and sterilisation methods, the intended purpose and the results of any previous relevant assessments that have been carried out in accordance with this Regulation. The notified body shall document its rationale for the sample(s) taken. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 21

Sampling Plans We should be aiming to sample more class C than B BUT Challenge to achieve with the current NBOG and GMDN codes Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 22

Additional Scrutiny for Class D devices Pre Certification As part of the conformity assessment a reference laboratory will test the device to the Common Specification with specific focus on sensitivity. The notified body must take this into consideration the Reference lab has 60 days to respond Post certification The NB informs the Commission of all Class D certificates A Competent Authority or the Commission can select a file for review following concerns outlined in the IVDR The Commission will create an electronic document exchange system with the Notified Body Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 23

Clinical Expectations 24

Clinical Requirements Increased expectation for clinical requirements Clinical evidence is to be kept up to date during the life time of the device The GHTF documents now in the IMDRF archive best guidance Clinical Performance Studies for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Clinical Evidence for IVD Medical Devices Key Definitions and Concepts Clinical Evidence for IVD Medical Devices Scientific Validity Determination and Performance Evaluation CLINICAL EVIDENCE Analytical Performance SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY Clinical Performance CLINICAL UTILITY Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 25

Clinical Evidence Scientific validity Refers to the association of an analyte to a clinical condition or physiological state For established analytes, this may be from literature; but for companion diagnostics or novel analytes this needs to be established Analytical performance Refers to the ability of an IVD medical device to correctly detect and measure a particular analyte Performance requirements similar to IVD Directive essential requirements Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Clinical performance Refers to its ability to yield results that relate to a particular clinical condition physiological state for the intended use and in accordance with target population and where applicable to the intended user Data to support diagnostic accuracy compared to reference test; information related to expected values Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 26

Performance evaluation and performance studies Chapter VI Article 47 2. The clinical evidence shall support the intended purpose of the device as stated by the manufacturer and be based on a continuous process of performance evaluation, following a performance evaluation plan. 6. The performance evaluation and its documentation shall be updated throughout the life cycle of the device concerned with data obtained from implementation of the manufacturer's post-market performance follow-up plan, as part of the post-market surveillance plan referred to in Article 8(7). The performance evaluation report for devices classified as class C and D shall be updated when necessary, but at least annually with these data. The summary of safety and performance shall be updated as soon as possible, where necessary. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 27

Performance Studies Article 48 - General requirements regarding performance studies 1. Performance studies shall be subject to the provisions of Articles 48 to 58 of this Regulation if they are conducted under one or more of the following conditions: (a) where invasive sample taking is done only for the purpose of the performance study (b) where it concerns an interventional clinical performance study as defined in Article 2(37); (c) where the conduct of the study involves additional invasive procedures or other risks for the subjects of the studies; (d) in case of performance studies involving companion diagnostics. 2. Performance studies shall be performed in circumstances similar to the normal conditions of use of the device. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 28

Post-market performance follow-up (PMPF) IVD equivalent to PMCF Is a continuous process to update the performance evaluation Shall be part of the manufacturer's post-market surveillance plan. The manufacturer shall proactively collect and evaluate performance and relevant scientific data from the use of a device, The aim is to confirm the safety, performance and scientific validity throughout the expected lifetime of the device, the continued acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio to detect emerging risks on the basis of factual evidence. Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 29

Final Summary This is happening in the home stretch now but recent changes have been significant Manufacturers need to remember there is no grandfathering Requirements and expectations are increasing Important to keep up to speed Understand the impact to your organisations wider regulatory landscape Talk to notified bodies about their plans for designation and resource Classify your devices Look at the clinical data you have, is it enough how can you get what you need? Discuss at management reviews Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 30

Contact Name: Title: Address: Sue Spencer Head IVD BSI Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Milton Keynes, MK5 8PP, UK Telephone: +44 (0)1908 814861 Mobile: +44 (0)77857 16906 Email: sue.spencer@bsigroup.com http://medicaldevices.bsigroup.com/ Website: 31

Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved. 32