Groundwater Monitoring Under a UIC Class VI Permit for a Carbon Storage Project

Similar documents
UIC Class VI Permitting Experience

Illinois Basin Decatur Project & ADM Industrial CCS Demonstration

ScienceDirect. Commercial-Scale CCS Project in Decatur, Illinois Construction Status and Operational Plans for Demonstration

ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE PROJECT

ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE PROJECT

This presentation is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under DE FC26 05NT42590 and was

Safe Carbon Sequestration

BELL CREEK TEST SITE BASELINE MVA INITIATED

2 SECARB Anthropogenic Test SP030414

Lessons Learned from Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations: The Plains CO 2 Reduction Partnership

CO 2 Storage. Dr AK (Tony) Booer, Schlumberger Carbon Services, Abingdon, UK. 11 Jan, UKCCSC Winter Cambridge, UK

Carbon Sequestration, FutureGen, and Coal Gasification Development in the Illinois Basin

WESTCARB Annual Business Meeting

JUNE 14-16, 2016 SHERATON TYSONS CORNER TYSONS, VA. #CCUS

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

Pilot Scale CO 2 EOR in Mississippian Carbonate Reservoir at Wellington Field in South-Central Kansas

NEUTRON. Prepared. Neil W. Dotzenrod John A. Hamling. Edward N. Steadman John A. Harju. University. Grand Forks,

World Class CO 2 Sequestration Potential in Saline Formations, Oil and Gas Fields, Coal and Shale:

Modeling and Monitoring Associated CO 2 Storage at the Bell Creek Field

Managing guncertainty in Geologic Storage. Dwight Peters Schlumberger Carbon Services

AEP CCS Program Overview Gary O. Spitznogle Director New Tech Development & Policy Support December 7, 2010

CO2CRC Otway Stage 2: CO 2 Storage in Saline Formation

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BRINE EXTRACTION AND STORAGE TEST (BEST) PROJECT UPDATE

CO 2 Injection Surface Facility Design

Modeling and mapping the area of potential impact (AoPI) for Class VI CO 2 injection wells

JUNE 14-16, 2016 SHERATON TYSONS CORNER TYSONS, VA. #CCUS

POTENTIAL FOR GEOLOGICAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION USING DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN

RESULTS FROM CSLF-RECOGNIZED PROJECTS: FORT NELSON PROJECT AND ZAMA PROJECT

BELL CREEK TEST SITE INITIATION OF PRODUCTION AND INJECTION SIMULATION

Aquistore. Saskatchewan s Deep Saline CO 2 Storage Research Project. April 19, Presented by Kyle Worth, P.Eng., PMP to INRS, Quebec City

ENHANCED COAL BED METHANE PRODUCTION AND SEQUESTRATION OF CO 2 IN UNMINEABLE COAL SEAMS

Geologic Sequestration Rules: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Deep Geological Formations for Inventory Verification and Carbon Credits

Carbon Capture & Sequestration in the California Context

Task Force Update on Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage. John Litynski / Mark Ackiewicz Technical Group Meeting Tokyo, Japan October 2016

CO2CRC Otway Stage 2: CO 2 Storage in Saline Formation

SMU Geothermal Conference March 13, 2013

Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership p( (RCSP) Initiative. Traci Rodosta, RCSP Coordinator

US DOE Industrial CCS RD&D Program

PRODUCTION WELL WATER SHUT-OFF TREATMENT IN A HIGHLY FRACTURED SANDSTONE RESERVOIR

Monitoring and Verification of CO 2 Geological Storage sites

WESTCARB 2012 Business Meeting

Summary of Field Test Site and Operations

AEP CCS Project Update Mountaineer Plant - New Haven, WV

New Developments: Solved and Unsolved Questions Regarding Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 as a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Method

Geologic CO 2 Sequestration. Carbon Sequestration Meeting Open House July 18, 2007, Johannesburg-Lewiston Area School, Otsego County, Michigan

CO 2 Injection in a Saline Formation: Pre-Injection Reservoir Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis for Illinois Basin Decatur Project

Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 in Midwestern USA Learning from Field Validation Studies

Using Multi Scale Seismic Measurements for CO 2 Monitoring in CCUS/EOR Project - Farnsworth

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

Injection Wells for Liquid-Waste Disposal. Long-term reliability and environmental protection

A Different Future? Robert J. Finley Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign, Illinois

Is CCS (Geological Storage) Ready for Prime Time?

Class V Experimental Well Permit Process Items & Potential Issues for Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Project

How Green is My Oil? A Detailed Look at Carbon Accounting for CO 2 -EOR Sites

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

MRCSP Overview and Large Scale CO 2 Storage in the Mt. Simon Reservoir

Pilot experiments in Australia. Jonathan Ennis-King CSIRO

NETL Regional Partnerships - Overview

Outline of Presentation

CO 2 Sequestration Market Development

Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as a Regional Development Tool: Planning and Design Considerations Presenter : Kevin C OBrien, PhD

DOE Project Officer: DOE GRANT NO.: ParaMagnetic Logging, Inc. SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT. Principal Investigator:

SECARB Annual Stakeholders Meeting. March 7, 2012 John Litynski, PE Carbon Storage Technology Manager

Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide under the Safe Drinking Water Act s Underground Injection Control Program

Geological CO 2 storage works with appropriate site characterization and monitoring

Deep Well Injection for Concentrate Disposal. Why use injection wells for concentrate disposal?

Geological sequestration. or storage of CO 2

Steven Melzer, Melzer Consulting. Presented at the 19 th Annual CO 2 Flooding Conference. December 11-13, 2013, Midland, Texas

Compact Gasification Integration Studies

VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS FROM REMOTE NATURAL GAS

Latest Developments to Examine the Use of CO 2 and Ethane for EOR in the Bakken and Williston Basin Conventional Reservoirs

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

Florida s Diverse Use of Class I injection Wells

LNG Safety Research: FEM3A Model Development. Quarterly Report to Prepared by:

WESTCARB: Elizabeth Burton WESTCARB Technical Advisor LBNL Program Manager. (925)

CO2CRC Otway Stage 3 Project

Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Best Practices for Infrastructure Development

CCUS as a Regional Economic Development Tool: Planning and Design Considerations

CCUS as a Regional Economic Development Tool: Planning and Design Considerations

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration in Deep Geological Formations

Characterization and Modeling to Examine the Potential for CO 2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Bakken Petroleum System

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership

GE Global Research Rahul Bidkar Doug Hofer Andrew Mann Max Peter Rajkeshar Singh Edip Sevincer Azam Thatte

The site monitoring of the Lacq industrial CCS project. CSLF Storage and Monitoring Projects Workshop. Marc LESCANNE - R&D CCS

Steady State and Transient Modeling for the 10 MWe SCO 2 Test Facility Program

Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership A Southern States Energy Board Carbon Management Program

A Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion System for Carbon Capture. Ben Kumfer

Desalination Concentrate Disposal Using Injection Wells: Technical Challenges

Status of CCUS in the United States. Jarad Daniels. Office of Fossil Energy. Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Clean Coal and Carbon Management

Oxidation behavior of Fe- and Ni-base alloys in supercritical CO2 and related environments

FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST (Rev )

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Deep Geological Formations. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage

Thursday 28 th and Friday 29 th September Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ

Managing Climate Change and Securing a Future for the Midwest s Industrial Base. MRCSP, Michigan Basin Field Demonstration Briefing, March 2007

Gas-Water-Rock Interactions in Saline Aquifers Following CO 2 Injection: Results from Frio Formation, Texas, USA

Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

Phase II-Task 10: Evaluation of Large- in Central Appalachia

Appalachian Basin Test Site at FirstEnergy s R.E. Burger Plant

Transcription:

Groundwater Monitoring Under a UIC Class VI Permit for a Carbon Storage Project Groundwater Protection Council Annual Forum, Orlando, FL Sai Gollakota (NETL/DOE) Scott McDonald (ADM) September 11-14, 2016

The National Energy Technology Laboratory NETL s mission is to discover, integrate, and mature technology solutions to protect the environment and enhance the Nation s energy foundation for future generations 2

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Project DOE-FE ICCS Program Project cost of $208 million (DOE $141.4M) ADM, Decatur, Illinois (Saline storage) [Illinois ICCS project] Two DOE-Sponsored CCS Projects in Decatur, Illinois Illinois ICCS Project (Lead - ADM) Initiating operation in 2017 (one million tonnes per year capacity) Illinois Basin Decatur Project (Lead - ISGS) completed operation in November 2014 (sequestered one million tonnes of CO 2 over three years) Scale up factor of 3 to represent the operating capacity necessary for commercial power generating facilities. 3

Key Results of the IBDP Favorable porosity, permeability, and capacity properties of Mt. Simon Sandstone. Deep saline formation and three overlying caprock seals; hence, no adverse impacts were detected to date. Accepted CO 2 more easily than initially expected. Because of reservoir permeability stratification, with approximately one million tonnes injected, CO 2 remained in the lowermost Mt. Simon Sandstone. 4

Illinois ICCS Simplified Flow Diagram Wet CO 2 from Corn-to- Ethanol Fermentor Centrifugal Blower CO 2 CO 2 Inlet Separator Reciprocating Compressors Centrifugal Booster Pump Supercritical CO 2 Pipeline Primary Source of Drinking Water (140 ft) New Albany Shale Maquoketa Shale Water Tri-ethylene Glycol Dehydration Unit St. Peter Sandstone Eau Claire Shale CO 2 Sequestration 6630-6825 ft Mt. Simon Sandstone Saline Reservoir Pre-Cambrian Granite (7160 ft) 5

USEPA UIC Class VI Permit USEPA s Underground Injection Control permit to construct and to operate a Class VI injection well for the purpose of geologic sequestration of CO 2 Class VI permit has specific requirements for safe injection and storage of CO 2 Area of Review Maximum extent of the separate-phase plume or pressure-front (MESPOP) Class VI Permit Project Plan 6

Illinois ICCS Project Site Monitoring To demonstrate: Underground Sources of Drinking Water are protected CO 2 is safely and permanently stored CCS is safe, effective, and acceptable for GHG control Monitoring activities include: Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Network Deep Fluid Monitoring Well Logging Mechanical Integrity Testing (MIT) Pressure/Temperature Monitoring CO 2 Stream Analysis Time-Lapse Vertical Seismic Profile Survey 7

CCS Facilities in Decatur, Illinois Faries Parkway Substation IBDP Blower Building IBDP Compressor Building IBDP ICCS Injection Compressor Building Well & Motor Control Center ICCS GIS Building ICCS Blower Building ICCS Blower Motor Control Center East Substation (Hans) North Substation IBDP Geophysical Well 1 Mile Pipeline IBDP Monitoring Well IBDP (Injection completed) ICCS Substations ICCS Injection Well ICCS Geophysical Well National Sequestration Education Center ICCS Monitoring Well E N 8

ICCS Project: Injection Well Well completed September 2015 Injection well capacity = 3,000 metric tons/day of CO 2 5.5 in chrome tubing injection well 95 sidewall cores over a 2000 feet depth from the Eau Claire to the granite. Perforation zone: 6630-6825 ft Avg. porosity 22% (up to 30%) Avg. permeability 80 md (up to 400 md) 9

ICCS Project: Injection Well (cont.) Eau Claire 5050-5550 ft Mt Simon Sandstone thickness 1610 ft Precambrian granite basement below 7160 ft Drilled to total depth 7192 ft CO 2 mass flow will be measured at wellhead Fiber-optic Distributed Temperature Sensor that is capable of monitoring the injection well s annular temperature along the length of the tubing string. Downhole gauge located at 6267 ft Schlumberger packer set at 6311 ft (Depths Kelly Bushing 15.5 ft) 10

ICCS Project: Verification Well 7140 ft depth Perforated at the following depths: Ironton Galesville formation 5000-5010 ft (zone 5); Mount Simon formation: 5805-5810 ft (zone 4), 6492-6500 ft (zone 3), 6705-6710 (zone 2), and 7002-7007 ft (zone 1). The pressure and temperature gauges were installed at depths of 5027 ft, 5848 ft, 6524 ft, 6681 ft, 7041 ft (Depths Kelly Bushing 17 ft) 11

ICCS Project: Verification Well (cont.) Installed Schlumberger s IntelliZone (IZ) Compact* modular multizonal management system P/T gauges were positioned on the tubing, leaving the interior open for RST* logs and other surveys. Allows for periodic saturation logging using RST* reservoir saturation tool. Fiber-optic Distributed Temperature Sensor (DTS) IZ system operates in conjunction with Schlumberger s WellWatcher *mark of Schlumberger 12

ICCS Project: Geophysical Well St. Peter Sandstone: 3270-3480 ft Total depth: 3550 ft 100 ft from ICCS CCS#2 well Perforation at 3445-3455 ft (10 ft) P/T gauge at the bottom of Sercel unit (3400 ft) Sercel installation: Slim-wave retrievable geophones: WAVELAB surface control and acquisition panel: SlimWave Acquisition unit (Depths Kelly Bushing 17 ft) 13

Class VI Testing & Monitoring Plan To monitor (i) groundwater, (ii) well operations, (iii) CO 2 plume and pressure front. Monitor groundwater quality and geochemical changes above the confining zone (shallow, St. Peter, and Ironton-Galesville) Also monitor the injection zone (Mt. Simon Sandstone). Direct groundwater monitoring Fluid sampling and analysis* Pressure/Temperature monitoring Distributed Temperature Sensor Indirect groundwater monitoring Reservoir Saturation Tool (RST**) for CO 2 saturation Time-lapse VSP for plume tracking *Kuster Flow-Through Sampler St Peter & below; **mark of Schlumberger 14

Zones/Parameters Monitored Lower Glasford (100-140 ft) St. Peter Sandstone (3,450 ft) (lowermost USDW) Ironton-Galesville Formation (5,000 ft) Mt. Simon Sandstone (5,800-6,700 ft) Cations Anions Dissolved CO 2 Total Dissolved Solids Water Density (field) Alkalinity ph (field) Specific Conductance (field) Temperature (field) *Carbon 13 isotopes for St. Peter, Ironton-Galesville, and Mt. Simon 15

Groundwater Monitoring: Baseline Conditions (Sample analyses by ISGS) Parameter Units Lower Glasford Formation 100-140 ft St. Peter Sandstone 3,450 ft (GM) Ironton- Galesville Form. (VW) 5,000 ft Mt. Simon Sandstone 6,710 ft (VW) TDS mg/l 340-700 5,100 83,000 190,000 Chloride mg/l <100 2,500 50,000 120,000 SpC ms/cm 0.7-1.0 4.07 144.4 184.6 Dissolved CO 2 mg/l 320-570 270 71 58 Alkalinity mg/l 380-550 300 100 85 ph 6.75-7.5 7.46 6.24 5.96 16

Project Status Completed design and construction of the CO 2 compression, dehydration, and transmission facilities. A new 100 MW electrical substation and associated transmission lines were constructed and made operational. A 7192-ft Class VI injection well, a 7240-ft monitoring (verification) well, and a 3550-ft geophysical well were drilled and completed. As of September 2016, this project has completed over 99% of its construction; commissioning is in progress. Collected baseline site monitoring data. EPA permit review for injection authorization is in progress. Anticipate to begin CO 2 injection operations in 2017. 17

Acknowledgement U.S. Department of Energy Award No. DE-FE-0001547. Project team members include: Dr. Sallie Greenberg and Randall Locke (ISGS) John Medler (Schlumberger Carbon Services) Dr. Douglas Brauer and Dr. David Larrick (RCC) Steve Ryan (ADM) (Disclaimer: Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.) 18

For More Information, Contact NETL the ENERGY lab Delivering Yesterday and Preparing for Tomorrow 19