Reference Standards for Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Challenges Addressed

Similar documents
Pharmaceutical Reference Standards: Overview and Role in Global Harmonization

Minimization of Bioassay Test Result Shift When Implementing New Reference Standard Batches

PHARMACEUTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS

11 th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHARMACEUTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS. Siriphorn Laomanacharoen 21 December 2012

The United States Pharmacopeia Strategy on Biotherapeutic Products Standards. Jaap Venema, Ph.D. Chief Science Officer & Chair, Council of Experts

ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES AND BISPECIFIC ANTIBODIES: SCIENTIFIC & REGULATORY CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Validation of Analytical Methods used for the Characterization, Physicochemical and Functional Analysis and of Biopharmaceuticals.

Stability of Biological Products

Biotechpharma company profile. Romanas Ramanauskas Business development manager

Regulatory Considerations on. Office of Biotechnology Products

USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)

Antibody-Drug Conjugate Characterization and Quality Assurance

Changes to a Potency Bioassay for Biotechnology Products: a Regulatory Perspective Kathleen A. Clouse, Ph.D., Director Division of Monoclonal Antibodi

Guide. recombinant DNA proteins. for the elaboration of monographs on synthetic peptides and. European Pharmacopoeia

Development. - Be Your Partner-

CMC Strategy Forum Japan November Piyanan Boonprasirt Bureau of Drug Control Thailand Food and Drug Administration

CASE STUDY: THE USE OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE IN ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTEGRATED CONTROL STRATEGY AND CLINICALLY RELEVANT SPECIFICATIONS

Developing the Control Strategy for Enhanced Testing and Continuous Monitoring

Antibody-Drug Conjugates The Road to the Current State. Nila Das, Ph.D. American Drug Delivery & Formulation Summit San Diego, CA June 13, 2016

ADVANCES IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY FOR WELLNESS AND SUSTAINABLE HEALTH

Extractables and leachables: An Introduction

Regulatory Challenges for the Licensure of Future Vaccines

PHARMACEUTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS

CASSS CMC Strategy Forum Barcelona, Spain. EBE Satellite Session Comparability Concept Paper 21 st March 2011

FDA recommendations for comparability studies to support manufacturing changes. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ/CDER/FDA

Develop A Highly Similar" Biosimilar Compound: Lessons Learnt

Ancillary Materials for Cell & Tissue Therapies Definitions, US Regulatory Approach, and USP s Risk-Tiered Approach

Regulatory Perspective on Analytical Method Validation During Product Development

Regulatory Issues and Drug Product Approval for Biopharmaceuticals

Expert Consensus on Quality Control and Preclinical Evaluation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Technical Challenges in the Development of Biosimilars. E. Morrey Atkinson, PhD Interphex May 1, 2012

Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review

2-2 Sterile Product Assessment. Satish Mallya Ph.D Training Workshop CPH, May 2015

The Role of Mass Spectrometry for Developing Biotherapeutics: Regulatory Perspectives

LAB EXPERTS AT YOUR SIDE Over twenty years of experience

PROCESS VALIDATION ROCHAPON WACHAROTAYANKUN, PH.D.

Process Performance Monitoring & needed engagement tools

Table 37: Design of Stability Studies for Biotechnology Product Development and Lifecycle Management A New USP Chapter

On the Q&A to the Guideline for Common Technical Documents

PMDA Perspective on Specifications for Biotechnological Products

PHARMACEUTICAL TESTING

Characterization of Biotechnology Products: A Regulatory Perspective

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing CBER Perspective

PRAXIS. A publication by Bioengineering AG

Regulatory Review Considerations of Drug-Linker Quality in ADCs

Biosimilars Scientific Challenges and Implications

Quality of raw materials and manufacturing of advanced therapies. Fouad Atouf, Ph.D. Head, Global Biologics July 12, 2018

Capillary Electrophoresis Compendial Applications

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES. Handling and working with Analytical Standards

ASMF/DMF Quality Assessment Report (QAR) IGDRP Quality Working Group

Guideline on the Requirements for Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials

Thank You to United States Pharmacopeia for Their Sponsorship and Assistance

Ph. Eur. monographs and biosimilars

Table 12: Design of Stability Studies for Biotechnology Product Development and Lifecycle Management A New USP Chapter

Validation Needs for Sterilization by Aseptic Filtration

Analytical Tools for Higher Order Structure Assessment in Comparability and Biosimilarity

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

fact sheet 3 Introduction to Biosimilars & Regulatory Requirements

Laboratory Services Alcami s comprehensive development and testing services are well established and ready to assist your pharmaceutical product

Proposed Revision of USP General Chapter Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography Compounding <823>

Reference Standards for Bioassays

Reference Standards: Overview and Strategy for Development to Commercialization

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

October 10, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Critical Quality Attributes for Biotechnology Products: A Regulatory Perspective

Inspection Trends. American Society for Quality Richmond, VA Section March 8, 2016

Guideline for the Quality, Safety, and Efficacy Assurance of Follow-on Biologics

A FDA Product Reviewer s Perspective on Building A Quality Dossier

Japanese Pharmacopoeia s Challenge to the Globalization

The Complete Solution: Althea s Simplified ADC Supply Chain

Control Strategy. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10

Prioritizing and Managing Key CMC Elements

Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing A Regulatory Perspective

BioConvergence Technical Paper

Notice Our file number:

ICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management

How do you know the drug you are using is safe and effective?

Biological Reference Preparations

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

Recent experience in scientific advice and marketing authorisations

Phase Appropriate GMPs for IMPs. Presented by: Karen S. Ginsbury For: IFF, October 31, Nov 02, 2017

9/2/2014. USP Monograph Modernization. Todays topics. USP basic. Todays topics. - USP basic. - USP publications. - USP monograph modernization

Validation/Verification of Test Methods An FDA Perspective. Laure H. Kairawicz, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Expert Witness

Being Clinically Relevant While Setting Specifications

Regulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017

Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA

BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS EVALUATED FOR VIRAL CLEARANCE

Microbiology Testing: USP requirements for Sterile and Nonsterile Preparations Webinar Q&A

Overview Rentschler Biotechnologie

CURRENT CHALLENGES IN GLOBAL REGULATORY COMPLIANCE QUALITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS PHARMACOPOEIAL HARMONISATION PROCESS

ICH Q11 Development & manufacture of drug substances

Cleaning and Cleaning Validation of API Plant and Equipment

Examples of regulatory expectations for analytical characterization and testing

Leachable and Extractable Testing

A GUIDE TO BIOMANUFACTURING AT GENZYME

VICH Topic GL40. at Step 7 GUIDELINE ON TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR NEW BIOTECHNOLOGICAL/BIOLOGICAL VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Reflection Paper. The Role of Product-specific Monographs for Biotherapeutic Products in Pharmacopoeias

Transcription:

CASSS WCBP 2012: 16th Symposium on the Interface of Regulatory and Analytical Sciences for Biotechnology Health Products January 23-25, 2012 Reference Standards for Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Challenges Addressed Matthew Borer, Ph.D. Advisor Analytical Sciences Research and Development Eli Lilly and Company

The Role of Reference Standards: Pharmaceutical Analysis Reference Standards are developed as part of the analytical control strategy for each drug product Each reference standard has a control strategy of its own Reference Standards play a central role in assuring the quality of medicines for patients during cgmp testing and release activities 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 2

Typical RS Packaging Options Bulk containers dispense upon customer order Prepackaged powder Screw-cap bottle Flame-sealed ampoule Content-per-vial Lyophilized Stable compounds No handling issues Less expensive materials Infrequent use Efficient dispensing (resources & materials) Convenient for lab (end-use dating) Protection from oxygen and moisture Shipping limited quantity exception Difficult to weigh Hygroscopic, flocculent Expensive or limited supply Toxic 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 3

Key Challenge: Packaging Solution o presentation typically y mandatory Poly-cryovials Re-closable ampoules No special filling equipment Compatibility testing CO 2 ingress adsorption extractables Cryo-compatible glass ampoules Hermetic seal Inert atmosphere Fewer issues with adsorption/extractables Less expensive Single use Special filling equipment 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 4

Key Challenge: Sterility Is Sterility Required? The reference standard d is used in cell-based assays where contaminant t organisms can proliferate Contaminant organisms can grow and degrade peptides on storage Or Not? Reference materials are not drug products, so patient safety is not impacted Aseptic manufacturing is difficult and facilities might not accept some source materials An Answer: Sterile filter the bulk reference material source solution Prepare the reference materials in a clean environment Store reference materials frozen Include a broad-spectrum antibiotic in the cell culture medium 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 5

Key Challenge: Source Material Selection Development batch or batch used in toxicological testing. May be sourced dfrom mixed pool of clones. Recommended to replace the initial batch with one derived from the FHD batch, or a batch that is representative. Replace batch only when projected to stock-out or in the event of a significant ifi process change. First Laboratory RS New Batch New Batch Commercial Development First Human Dose (FHD) First Efficacy Dose (FED) 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 6

Source Material: Commercialization Derived from, or representative of, a batch used in pivotal clinical studies. Represents the final optimized commercial process. Compendial RS Primary RS New Batch (unlikely event) Secondary RS New Batch New Batch Formal Stability Global Registration Prefer to source from same packaging run as the first Primary RS. Subsequent Secondary RS sourced from a representative batch. 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 7

Key Challenge: Characterization Reference standard characterization must be customized to support its specific intended use ICH Q3a, IV Reference standards d used in the analytical l procedures for control of impurities iti should be evaluated and characterized according to their intended uses. WHO, Annex 3, Technical Report Number 885,3 It is necessary to consider all data obtained from testing the material by a wide variety of analytical methods. When taken as a whole, this will ensure that the substance is suitable for its intended use. The extent of the analyses required depends on the purpose(s) for which the chemical reference substance is to be employed, and may involve a number of independent laboratories. ISO 34, 4.1.1 It should be recognized that a reference material needs to be characterized mainly to the level of accuracy required for its intended purpose 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 8

Typical mab Characterization Tests Appearance Identity Light and Heavy Chain MS Protein Quantity UV Charge Heterogeneity Ion-exchange chromatography Purity Size-exclusion HPLC Reduced SDS-PAGE (or CE- SDS) Oligosaccharide Profile Capillary Electrophoresis-LIF Potency Bioassay ph 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 9

The Characterization Challenge No way to fully define the Potency of a mab using physiochemical testing, so the Primary RS defines biological activity but The Primary RS has no basis for comparison, so monitoring for change in Potency is hampered and Bioassay methods are typically highly variable, making it difficult to measure small changes 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 10

Potency Assignment Strategy: Initial Batch First Laboratory RS is assigned a value of 100% RS Relative Potency (RP) Laboratory Subsequent Laboratory RS batches are assigned relative to the previous Laboratory RS Primary RS Secondary RS The Primary RS is assigned a value of 100% RP Confirmation of a dose response relationship For-information-only Bioassay comparison to Laboratory RS more extensive for IgG1 mabs due to greater potential for potency change Extensive physicochemical comparability testing to Laboratory RS The initial Secondary RS is based on the same characterization tests as the Primary RS (same source material) A subsequent Secondary RS is assigned a value of 100% RP if the bioassay versus the Primary RS is within a pre-defined window 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 11

Potency Assignment Strategy: Replacement Batch Laboratory RS Analyzed by the biological assay using 5 independent measurements relative to the previous RS If the average relative potency is within 80-120% RP, the new reference standard will be assigned a value of 100% RP If the average potency falls outside of the interval, an investigation is conducted. Question the suitability of the material Consider a larger number of replicate measurements in order to assign the RP directly to the previous standard 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 12

Potency Assignment Strategy: Replacement Batch Secondary RS Analyzed by the biological assay using 10 independent measurements relative to the Primary RS If the average relative potency is within 95-105% RP, the new reference standard will be assigned a value of 100% RP If the average potency falls outside of the interval, an investigation is conducted Question the suitability of the material Consider a larger number of replicate measurements in order to assign the RP directly to the previous standard 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 13

Independent Measurement Defined Independent Measurement - In General An average reported result based on a replication strategy that encompasses appropriate variance components associated with the measurement Independent Measurement for Bioassay Three plates Three replicates at each dose level for each: Sample Standard Control sample 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 14

Key Challenge: Ongoing Suitability for Use (a.k.a. a stability) Comprehensive physicochemical testing Monitoring bioassay curve parameters over time Overprotective packaging and storage temperature Assess representative stability (e.g., from the commercial process) Stress stability Promote the implementation of higher order standard (e.g., WHO International Standard) Careful control of bioassay Use of an independent control material Control over key reagents Consistent technique and comprehensive analyst training Control over instrumentation 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 15

Future Challenges The difficulties associated with characterization of biomolecule reference standards make harmonization of multiple compendial reference standards a challenge Global manufacturers must meet regional standards Different doses of the same drug in different regions does not make sense for patients Differences in compendial RS assignments can happen Variability in measurements Differences in the characterization approach This will be a particular challenge for monoclonal antibodies 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 16

Co-Authors Kimberley B. Dancheck Kristi L. Griffiths Bryan J. Harmon Jerry J. Lewis Jerry Zhirui Lian Bhavin S. Parekh 2012 Eli Lilly and Company 17