Ulrich Karpen, University of Hamburg

Similar documents
Strasbourg, 2 February 1998 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW POWERS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS OF FEDERATED ENTITIES IN GERMANY

GERMAN GOVERNMENT BUNDESREGIERUNG / THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT APCGP

The Székelyland Autonomy By Dr.Csapó József

Central Government. Political Unit. Central Government. Political Unit

EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION

2.6 let s be responsible

Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro

The Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Alex Goodman and Naina Patel

KAZAKHSTAN COMMENT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE REDISTRIBUTION OF POWERS ON THE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

DRAFT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF GEORGIA *

Allocating State Authority in View of Constitutional Changes in Georgia

Adopted by the State Duma on September 22, Chapter I. General Provisions

Chapter 22: Comparative Political Systems Section 4

Japanese Democracy. Shigemi JOMORI Ambassador of Japan. 21 st November 2014 Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ljubljana

Do States have a role to influence multi- and bilateral processes in a political and economic environment?

Chapter Six. Government and Policymaking

Chapter 1: Foundations of Government

RUSSIAN SOVIET FEDERATIVE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC LAW ON THE LANGUAGES OF THE PEOPLES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT OPINION ON

Brain Wrinkles. Africa s. Republic of Kenya & Republic of South Africa

Adopted by the State Duma on June 24, 1997 Approved by the Federation Council on July 3, 1997

Luxembourg: Parliament abolishes royal confirmation of laws. 1. The history of the Luxembourg royal assent

Dividing Powers Who Does What and How?

LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY

Brussels, 28 October 2002 (OR. fr) THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION THE SECRETARIAT CONV 369/02

Chapter 6: Government and Policy Making

Independence and powers of independent supervisory authorities

Act A law made by a legislative body and given assent by the head of state.

Adopted by the State Duma on September 22, 1999

During the decade of the 50 s, the national territories were made into provinces and 8 new provinces were admitted: Chaco, Chubut, Formosa, La Pampa,

Act on the Government Offices of Iceland 1)

11th Conference on Data Protection and Data Security - DuD 2009 Berlin, 8 June 2009

1%29+%40ref+%2B+%28Germany%29+%40ref&highlight=&querytype=bool&context=0

Parliamentary and Presidential Systems

Asunto: Contribución de D. Adrian Severin, miembro suplente de la Convención: "La reforma institucional"

Implementation of the EITI in a federal country experience gained and lessons learned

The Federal Democracy of Australia

Part Three: Political Structures/Institutions

Fact sheet on legal foundations for fiscal, economic, and monetary integration

The American Anomaly. A Chapter-by-Chapter Synopsis

Legal Personnel. Dr Stephanie Law

Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs

THE LAW ON THE SPECIAL LEGAL STATUS OF GAGAUZIA (Gagauz Yeri)

TEXTS ADOPTED. Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union

JAPAN. The Basic Law for a Gender-equal Society (Law No. 78 of 1999) (Tentative Translation in English)

BSR INTERREG III B project. Promoting Spatial Development by Creating COMon MINdscapes

CHAPTER TWO THE REPUBLIC

TEXTS ADOPTED. having regard to the Treaties, and in particular to Articles 2, 3, 4 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),

SURVEY OF ANTI-CORRUPTION MEASURES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN OECD COUNTRIES: KOREA

IMPLEMENTATION OF DECENTRALIZATION IN CAMEROON: PROBLEMS, CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES

Briefing Paper. Electoral reform in Lebanon: steps for ensuring improved parliamentary elections in IFES Lebanon.

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STATE. Giuseppe Franco Ferrari

European Governments: United Kingdom, Russia, & Germany Brain Wrinkles

BRIEF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS

The Roles and Responsibilities Of Members of Parliament (MPs)

Unofficial Translation. For reference only. 1

Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 1

LAW on special legal status of Gagauzia (Gagauz-Yeri)

Open Government and Democracy Policy

Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 1

Sources of English Law (1): Act of Parliament

Guidelines on the Conduct of Ministers, Ministers of State, Exempt Staff and Public Servants During an Election

THE LEGAL CONVERGENCE CRITERION AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC

SSCG1 Compare and contrast various systems of government.

Summary of Macedonia

Amending the (Dutch) Constitution?

Henry6SS (H6SSGov) 1. An example of economic cooperation among European nations that occurred in the late 1900s was the

TRANSLATION OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF SINT MAARTEN (AB 2010, GT no. 30) NATIONAL ORDINANCE TRANSITIONAL LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

On the basis of Article 88, item 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro, I am passing the D E C R E E

Explanatory Memorandum to the Local Government (Politically Restricted Posts) (Wales) Regulations 2008

Establishment of a Foundation. for the Accreditation of Study Courses in Germany

United States Government

THE STRENGTH OF AMERICAN FEDERAL DEMOCRACY by Roger Myerson

Government Act (175/2003; amendments up to 970/2007 included)) Chapter 1 Government organisation and mandates

LEGAL BASIS COMMON RULES

EU citizens engagement initiative and Digital platforms for Open policy making in Finland, United Kingdom and Republic of Macedonia

Namibian civil-military relations in the new millennium

DRAFT OPINION ON LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS CONCERNING EARLY ELECTIONS IN UKRAINE. on the basis of comments by

laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and stand

MOROCCAN INITIATIVE FOR NEGOTIATING AN AUTONOMY STATUTE FOR THE SAHARA REGION

POWERS AND LIABILITIES OF THE PRESIDENT DUAL LEADERSHIP IS ABOLISHED CRIMINAL LIABILITY IS APPLIED TO THE PRESIDENT AND MINISTERS

EU draft Constitution- Provisions gorverning the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

THE EUROPEAN UNION A This is the EU facts and figures B Stages in the process of European integration

Primary Sources: Selections from the Constitution and the Taif Agreement

Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy

The World Will Be Your Oyster?

Comparative Federalism Experiences from Germany

European Commission, Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU

Field 050: Social Studies Government and Citizenship Assessment Blueprint

T H E W O R L D J O U R N A L O N J U R I S T I C P O L I T Y

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt United States Government correlated to

CONSTITUTION. Principality of New Atlantis

D CA F. What are parliamentary committees on defence and. What are parliamentary committees on defence and. security? security?

A Study on Decentralisation from Chinese Prospective

PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION

Summary. The Secret of Ministerial Responsibility. The Relationship between Crown, Cabinet, Chamber and Constituencies.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Transcription:

Subnational Constitutionalism in Germany Ulrich Karpen, University of Hamburg 1. The Basic Law, Germany s constitution, came into force on May 23 rd, 1949, established the federal system as an integrative one. After a 12 year break caused by the Hitler regime it replaced the Weimar Constitution of 1919, which, just like its predecessor, the Imperial Constitution of 1871, had established a federal state characterised by the principle of allegiance of the federation in the relationship between the federal government and the Länder and between the Länder themselves. While the federal state of the German Empire before 1806 came into existence by way of decentralisation through the creation of autonomous individual states (dutchies, principalities, a.s.o.), the creation of the federal state order in 1871 occurred in precisely the opposite direction and must be understood as a product of the amalgamation or accession of individual Länder. The Federal Republic of Germanyin terms of international law is identical with the Empire of 1871, the Länder are states in full sense. Thus Article 30 of the Basic Law (BL) lays down that the exercise of the state powers and the discharge of state functions is a matter for the Länder. Any divergence from this rule for the distribution of responsibilities had to be laid down in the BL. Nevertheless, even during the early days of the Federal Republic there were numerous interconnections between the responsibilities of the federal government and the Länder, i.e. no pure dual federalism as in the United States. The framework of responsibility e.g. in the field of legislation allowed the federal government from the very beginning to draw up such detailed regulations that the Länder hardly had any freedom to make decisions regarding their own political programmes. 2. Germany consists of 16 Länder, including three city states (Hamburg, Bremen and Berlin). The size of the Länder differs considerably. While the smallest Land, Bremen, has 680,000 inhabitants, the largest Land, North Rhine-Westphalia, has more than 17.9 million inhabitants, i.e. more than 25 times as many as Bremen. The composition of the German population which now consists of 82.1 million people is largely homogenous from the ethnic point of view. The German population is spread over a total area of 357.000 square kilometers. After 45 years of political division due to the East-West-conflict, the reunification of Germany took place in 1990, when the German Democratic Republic had collapsed politically and economically.

Five new Länder, which were established on the territory of the former GDR, joined the eleven of the old FRG and were covered by the Basic Law. 3. All subnational units, the Länder, like the Federation, have full quality of states, namely the competence to self-organisation, to writing their own constitutions, jurisdiction and cultural affairs, representation versus the Federation and other Länder, fiscal autonomy and equal treatment with all other Länder. All Länder have to fulfill the same tasks regardless of their size, number of inhabitants and economic or financial strength, and they have equal rights in dealing with the Federation. It is thus so called symmetric federalism, if one disregards the different weighting of votes in the Federal Council which may be addressed as being the Second Chamber of parliament. All Länder have their own constitutions, mostly full constitutions in the sense that they cover basic rights and organisation and functions of the state. In fact, most of the constitutions of the Länder have been adopted prior to the establishment of the Federal Republic and the coming into effect of the Basic Law (May 23 rd, 1949). Many of the Länder constitutions have been amended after the establishment of the Federal Republic, following the main lines of the BL. 4. In accordance with the intentions of the founding fathers of the constitution, the BL was originally designed with a strongly decentralised system of federalism in mind. The BL lists the tasks and responsibilities of the Federation. Conversely, this means that all the tasks and responsibilities not mentioned there must be fulfilled by the Länder and the municipalities which are part of the constitutional domain of the Länder. So the residual power of the federal system rests with the Länder and their constitutions regulate on their discharge. The Federation is responsible for foreign relations, defence, a.s.o. Some matters like schools, police a.s.o. are completely in the responsibility of the Länder. The Federation and the Länder are jointly responsible as detailled in different participation in legislation and administration for all the other tasks, and here the Federation takes precedence. This includes civil law, criminal law, procedural law, a.s.o. Generally speaking, the Federation prevails in legislation, the Länder prevail in administration. 5. The Länder can write their own constitutions and, in addition to that of the Federation, they also have their own constitutional jurisdiction. The BL only is bound merely to create homogenous constitutional structures. Their constitution must be in accordance with the principles of the democratic and social state governed by the rule of law and must have a republican character (Article 28 BL). The observation of these principles can be examined by the Federal Constitutional Court and, in the most extreme case, it can be enforced by means of federal compulsion (Article 37 BL). Apart from this, the Länder are free to choose their own system

of government. The Länder can create their own organs of government and compliment the parliamentary system with processes of direct democracy. The direct election of the prime ministers in the Länder by the people would be permissible, but so far it has only been discussed and has not been introduced. All the members of government and senior civil servants in the Länder are elected or appointed. The Federation has no possibility of influencing the filling of these positions. 6. As a rule, the constitutions of the Länder were drafted and passed by the Länder parliaments. The same procedure is true for amendments. In general, a two-third majority of the members of the house is needed. In some Länder in addition a referendum is required. Even the initiative for an amendment may be taken by a referendum. The BL takes preference in any contradiction between the Federal and the Land constitution (Article 31 BL). The federal government has no role in the Länder constitution adopting or amending process. Amendments of Länder constitutions which are in conflict with protection of human dignity and human rights, democracy, rule of law, social state principle and the basic elements of German federalism shall be inadmissible (Article 79, 28 BL). 7. The BL and the Länder constitutions are very much homogenous. The Federation and the Länder all have parliamentary systems of government based on the British model in which the existence of the government, i.e. its formation and its continued existence, are dependent on the majority of the parliament. The decisions in favor of parliamentary systems were strongly influenced by the negativ experiences with the presidential system during the Weimar Republic. The position of the chiefs of government, namely the chancellor and the Länder Prime Ministers, are strong since they determine the general guidelines of policy. Most constitutions know the constructive veto of no confidence, i.e. the chief of government (and cabinet) are dismissed, if parliament elects a successor by a vote of the majority of its members. There are differences as far as the form of democracy is concerned. Whereas the BL is imprinted with negligable exceptions by the representative democracy, most Länder constitutions introduced namely after accession of the new Länder in the unification process in 1990 different forms of direct democracy. Legislation, even amendments of the constitution, may be initiated by the people; laws may be adopted by plebiscite. The laws of election differ, partly significantly (personal or list-voting systems). Bavaria was the only Land which had for fifty years a bicameral system which then was abolished by a referendum. The city Länder Bremen, Hamburg and Berlin are states and municipalities as well. This requires, of course, special constitutional provisions for organisation and function of government.

As a lesson from the inhuman system of National Socialism, the founding fathers of the BL and the Länder constitutions laid special emphasis on guaranteeing individual human rights and civil rights which are directly applicable and binding on all state activities and may be enforced by the courts. All Länder constitutions except one contain basic rights catalogues. They differed although always covering the classical bill of rights very much in the Länder constitutions as adopted before the BL (1949). After subsequent amendments of harmonization with the BL, nowadays the human rights sections of the Länder constitutions are widely homogenous. Since the Länder are bound by the basic rights provisions of the BL and all German citizens enjoy them, the importance of Länder basic rights is understood as being limited. But Länder constitutions can incorporate other or more extensive basic rights than the BL and some do. This applies, e.g., to fields where the Länder have special responsibilities (culture, internal security). Some Länder constitutions contain basic rights in the economic or social security spheres. Länder basic rights, however, must not be in contradiction to the BL and must not fall short of the minimum standard of the federal basic rights (Article 142 BL). 11. All Länder except one have constitutional courts. They have exclusively the task of watching over the compatibility of acts undertaken by the state power of a Land with its own Land constitution. This decision is not subject to any further examination by the Federal Constitutional Court. Since the law of each Land, however, cannot be in contradiction with the BL, the Federal Constitutional Court can declare any Land law, including provisions of the Land constitution, as void for breach of the BL. 12. The federal constitution, the BL, has been amended a total of 50 times since it was passed in 1949, which means an average once a year. Most of the changes concern the shifting of responsibilities to the federation at the expense of the Länder. Other amendments have been caused by reunification of the country, social developments and the European integration. As a whole, the BL is a very stable constitution. The same is true for the Länder constitutions. They underwent in general fewer amendments than the BL, some of them to harmonize the Land constitution with the BL, many to introduce procedures of referendum and plebiscite and changing local and municipal self-government. 13. Most Länder constitutions are significantly smaller than the BL. The latter has 150 Articles, the former have between 70 and 100 Articles. Many Länder constitutions have small civil rights sections. The legislation competences and finance sections are more condensed. An exception is the Bavarian constitution of 1946, which is much more detailled than the BL. It covers, indeed, many provisions ordinarily associated with statutory law. The same obser-

vation applies to the Länder constitutions of Bremen, North Rhine-Westphalia and Hessen. Regulations cover the right to access to lakes, participation of workers in enterprise-boards, nomination of civil servants, details of labor law, right to vacation and entitlement to receive school books on free. 14. In the perception of the citizens the Federal Constitution (and its interpretation by the Federal Constitutional Court) is strong. Some speak of a patriotism based on the constitution. In comparison, the impact of Länder constitutions is weak. They certainly are a factor of identity-building, integration of the Länder citizens. They add to the colours of the supreme law, are an element of diversity in unity. An essential factor of their weakness is the creeping powerlessness of the Länder, due to mainly three reasons. Firstly there are too many Länder, some of them not capable of fulfilling their functions. Instead of 16 Länder a reorganisation and condensation to 5 or 6 units is urgently necessary. Second, the Länder lose more and more competences to the centre and to Europe. There are except culture, police, civil service (as limited) few fields of genuine responsibility of the Länder. And third, mechanisms of cooperative federalism are more and more used. Cooperation, coordination, conferences of Länder governments and ministers, uniform model legislation form a third level in between the Federation and the Länder. In the meantime, this system has not only proved to be rippling, but also problematic from the democratic point of view because everybody can be responsible for everything and therefore nobody is responsible for anything. For this reason efforts are currently being made to break up this integrated system again, thus achieving greater transparency with regard to decision-making and responsibility, and permitting more competition between the federal government and the Länder. So German Federalism is under discussion and has to be improved, but this is more a matter of the Federal Constitution and not of the constitutions of the Länder.