arena that impact on clinical development

Similar documents
Multinational Clinical Trials in EU How NCAs can improve the system? Dr C. Bélorgey, Head of Clinical Trials Department Afssaps Chair of CTFG

EudraCT database and EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR)

The future clinical trial authorisation process: the new evaluation process

Challenges of Multicenter Studies in Europe, EURECNET, Bratislava, 13 April 2012

Authorisation of ATMPs in EU: routes to facilitate prompt availability for patients.

Annual report 2011 Clinical trials of medicines in humans

ENTR/F/2/SF D(2009) Assessment of the Functioning of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC Public Consultation

Update on EU member state harmonisation. Seán Kilbride, HPRA, CTFG co-secretariat

Roles and responsibilities of members and alternates, rapporteur and peer reviewers, experts and observers of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO)

Fergus Sweeney, European Medicines Agency

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

CTFG 10 September 2010

EU Clinical Trial Regulation A view from the Industry

Life cycle of a clinical trial. IMB Clinical Trial Seminar June 19 th Dr. Agnieszka Przybyszewska, MD, MSc, PhD, PGDipPharmMed.

CT Regulation: EMA role

Revision of the Clinical Trials Directive - Key issues and next steps

Federal agency for medicines and health products

Clinical Trials in Portugal. Wellcome!

Impact of the transposition of the European Clinical Trials Directive. CEMO, Paris 17 November 2004

Clinical Trials Environment EU Legislation: Ausblick auf die neue Gesetzgebung für klinische Prüfungen

13 May 2010 BY . Subject: Comments on the Concept Paper on the Revision of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

Date : Date of start of procedure: Authorisation/ positive opinion :

Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary

VERSION: 21 st June Date of Publication: 15 th March C/ CAMPEZO, 1 EDIFICIO MADRID Tel.: Fax:

European Medicines Agency policy on changes in scope of paediatric investigation plan (PIP) decisions

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

RSC/CT Det. no. 1/2013

ORPHAN DESIGNATION BY THE EMA. Paillard Juliette M2 AREIPS 15/11/2016

Folder Name Documents included Explanation

Sanofi-aventis and Sanofi Pasteur response

Key concepts of the paediatric regulation and latest developments

Guideline for participating sponsors

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE PAEDIATRIC REGULATION (REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (EC) No 1901/2006, AS AMENDED)

EUCERD RECOMMENDATION FOR A

REVISION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC UK RESPONSE TO CONCEPT PAPER

Guidance on preparing for Brexit in the centralised procedure

MHRA regulatory centre and Research Ethics Service (RES) combined ways of working pilot Instructions to sponsors (version 2.1)

How are medicines evaluated at the EMA

An SME perspective on the MAA process (including e-dossier preparation and submission)

Comment by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices in coordination with the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Federal Ministry of Health

Highlights of the proposed Clinical Trials Regulation in Europe

Date: Date of start of procedure: Authorisation/ positive opinion: Date: Date:

COMMENTS FROM EUROPABIO GENERAL COMMENTS

Connecting dots Can we collaborate better on digital health?

OVERVIEW OF DIRECTIVE 2001/20. Paul Derbyshire. Background & History. Aims of Directive 2001/20

Comments of the University-based Network of Coordinating Centers for Clinical Trials

Introduction to the European Medicines Agency

Chapter 28 Pharmaceutical acquis (human and veterinary medicinal products)

Deal Making and Product Development in Europe: Changes and Trends You Need to Know About: Regulatory Strategy

Guide to Clinical Trial Applications

The new EU clinical trial regulation 536/2014 : Low interventional trials

European Medicines Agency decision

Issues identified by stakeholders: follow-up from EMA s ATMP workshop

HPRA: Supporting Clinical Research in Ireland

within EudraCT; important data such as phase I clinical trials in adults are, however, not publicly

Regulatory Affairs: Study Report of New Drug Registration Process in European Union

Good Manufacturing Practice for ATMPs Rocio Salvador Roldan DG SANTE, Unit B5

Guidance for participating parties version 2.0, DISCLAIMER

Single Dossier: Will national early stage trials suffer or benefit? Regulatory Authority view

Scientific advice and its impact on marketing authorisation application reviews

EU Perspective on Regulatory Issues for Biologics

Clinical Trial Safety Reporting requirements

Transparency Policies in the EU from Clinical Trials to Pharmacovigilance

Clinical trials on medicinal products submitted to the ANSM as part of the Fast- Track procedure

Marketing Authorisation Routes in the EU

EU Regulation Review: challenges and opportunities for industry

Format and content of electronic periodic safety update reports (Technical contribution to EC implementing measure)

Regulatory requirements for cell based medicinal products

Pediatric drug development - do we need a PIP so early in development? American versus European approach

Clinical trials on medicinal products submitted to the ANSM as part of the Fast- Track procedure

Quality Assurance of Investigational Medicinal Products. Sue McKenzie PPQA (A)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

8 th STAMP expert group meeting

Pre-accession product information linguistic review process (PALC III)

Public Consultation Paper: Assessment of the Functioning of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENTS: EU CLINICAL TRIALS WITH GMO-BASED ATMPS ANN GORMAN, AMGEN LTD, UK 16 DECEMBER 2016

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Guidance for applicants for ethics committee opinion on the conduct of a clinical trial of pharmaceuticals

ICH GCP Revision and EU Clinical Trial Regulation

Medicines for Children

Recent update of the guidance for Parallel EMA/FDA scientific advice

Brexit Guidance for Stakeholders Human and veterinary medicines

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

Preparing for the withdrawal is therefore not just a matter for EU and national authorities, but also for private parties.

Supporting Innovation through Scientific Advice

Pharmacovigilance System Master file

Guide to Clinical Trial Applications

Pediatric Clinical Trials: The Need for Regulation (Part 1)

CMDh STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ON THE PROCESSING OF PSUR SINGLE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR NATIONALLY AUTHORISED PRODUCTS

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE OPERATION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC) AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Health systems and products Medicinal products authorisations, EMA Head of Unit

27 September Introduction

APPLICATION FOR PAEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION PLAN / WAIVER

EU scientific regulatory support mechanisms and initiatives for innovation in drug development: the EMA perspective

Priority Medicines (PRIME) scheme

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

Pharmacovigilance information for pharmaceutical companies

Transcription:

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT Changes in the regulatory arena that impact on clinical development 23 May 2011

Agenda Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure PIP and Paediatric requirements Changes to EudraCT and European Regulatory Legislation

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC aimed to harmonize the conduct of clinical trials within EU Member States (MS) However transposition of the Directive into national legislation led to differing practices, e.g: Distribution of duties between the national competent authorities (NCAs) and ethics committees (ECs) Content, format or language requirements Timelines for review Different application dates by Sponsor in different MS Workload versus number of applications per MS This can lead to differing decisions across MS, potentially jeopardizing the scientific value of the clinical trial

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) cont d The Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG) was created to coordinate implementation of the EU CT Directive CTFG has proposed a voluntary harmonization procedure (VHP) for the assessment of multinational clinical trials (MN-CTs) to be completed prior to the national review process The initial pilot phase of the process was carried out in 2009 and based on the results of this, the process has been streamlined, pilot phase enlarged and the timelines shortened The VHP consist of 3 phases: Phase 1 request of VHP Phase 2 assessment Phase 3 national step

Day 1-30: Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) cont d VHP assessment begins If no questions from the MS, or grounds for non-acceptance (GNA) then the Participating NCAs (P-NCA) will inform the VHP Committee (VHP-C) will issue a statement to the Applicant that the P-NCAs unanimously consider the CTA acceptable If there are questions, or GNA, then a consolidated response will be sent to the Applicant by Day 30, with the expectation that a response from the Applicant is received by Day 40 Day 40-60: The Applicant s response is then sent to the P-NCAs. Within 7 days the VHP-C compiles the assessment of the P-NCAs. If consensus is achieved, the application is considered approved by Day 50 If not, then a teleconference is organized to attempt to reach consensus. Any outstanding issues from P-NCAs are forwarded to the Applicant. If there is consensus that the CTA isn t approvable, the Applicant will be informed by Day 60 with the GNA and possible solutions

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) cont d Phase 3 National step The acceptability statement following the VHP does not imply that the MN-CT is authorised by the P-NCAs. Once the applicant has been notified that the CTA is considered acceptable, a CTA has to be submitted in each participating MS The cover letter should detail that the trial has undergone VHP and the approval attached. Generally the CTA will be accepted as long as no changes have been made The Applicant can decide to not include all P-NCAs in this step (in the case where they had GNA). The Applicant should submit within 20 days of VHP approval. Approval should be received within 10 days as long as the documents are identical The applicant should notify a list of the dates of authorisation of the MN- CT to the VHP-C, when available

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) cont In conclusion there have been differing opinions on whether or not this new procedure has in actual fact reduced timelines and streamlined the clinical trail application process across Europe At a glance it appears to add to the application workload as there now has to be a central submission as well as the national submissions The national competent authorities do not seem to adhere to the stipulated 10 days review time for the national applications Chiltern have been requested by 3 sponsors to try the new system

Paediatric Investigational Plan (PIP) All clinical trial applications are required to include reference to a PIP The sponsor should apply to the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) of EMA for approval of the PIP Should the medication not be relevant in a paediatric population a waiver should be sought from the EMA A deferral may also be applied for from the EMA The clinical trial must contained in an agreed Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) (it may involve sites in the Community, in third country(ies) or both) The MAA will be required to produce the PIP when applying for an MA and a reminder is provided on the EudraCT website:.

Paediatric Investigational Plan (PIP) cont d The clinical trial is one of those for which information has to be submitted in accordance with article 45 of Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 as amended : Article 45(1): By 26 January 2008, any paediatric studies already completed, by the date of entry into force, in respect of products authorised in the Community shall be submitted by the marketing authorisation holder for assessment to the competent authority The clinical trial is one of those for which information has to be submitted in accordance with article 46 of Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 as amended: Article 46(1): Any other marketing authorisation holder-sponsored studies which involve the use in the paediatric population of a medicinal product covered by a marketing authorisation, whether or not they are conducted in compliance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan, shall be submitted to the competent authority within six months of completion of the studies concerned. Chiltern are able to assist in the production of the PIP, Waiver or deferral

Recent Changes to EudraCT and Regulatory Legislation New EU Commission legislation (2010/C 82/01 CT-1) brought out in March 2010 Aim was to reduce documentation and amendments submitted to the EU regulatory agencies Still appears to be in the transition phase some countries have adopted it into their legislation and others have not Allows countries to request country specific documentation Defines the need to submit Substantial Amendments for approval Defines the fact that Non-Substantial amendments should not be submitted Could cause problems with IP release due to inconsistency with documents and information submitted and approved between countries If all countries adopted the legislation it would reduce the documentation required and number of amendments

EU Clinical Trials Register The EU Clinical Trials register is now live and information regarding the clinical trials is within the public domain The EU Clinical Trials Register website allows the public to search for information on clinical trials in European Union (EU) member states and the European Economic Area (EEA) and clinical trials which are conducted outside the EU/EEA if they form part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) Website: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/index.html Historical data (information entered into the EudraCT database between 1 May 2004 and the release of version 8.0 of the EudraCT database on 10th March 2011) will be gradually published online from 22 March 2011

EU Clinical Trials Register Users can find information on the design of trial, sponsor, investigational medicinal products, therapeutic areas and the status of the clinical trial Information available mirrors that provided within the EudraCT form If further information is required, users can contact the sponsor using information listed on site The EMA will not be able to provide any information on a specific clinical trial Current statistics of the information available are: Number of clinical trials in EU Clinical Trials Register: 13,073 Number of clinical trials with subjects less than 18 years old: 2,779