FORGESOLAR GLARE ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Share the Webinar with Your Followers

Site Report. Report Date 6/16/2016

Solar Energy Modeling for Residential Applications

UT Zero-Energy House Divide University of Tennessee, Knoxville Arc 572 I Spring 2008

Appendix T BIWF Shadow Flicker Analysis

Running the Electric Meter Backwards: Real-Life Experience with a Residential Solar Power System

A review of the benefits of a residential solar power installation in western North Carolina

5.5 KW DC PV SYSTEM Optimal Location W Solar PV Panels 60 Cell 250W PV Module

Analysis of Indoor Luminous Environment and Power Generation by Roll Screen and Venetian Blind with PV Modules

Cost Benefits of SunGuard SN 54

Basic of Bifacial. 1-1 What is Bifacial? 1-2 Terms related to Bifacial. Design guide for Bifacial

Shadow Flicker Impact Analysis for the Alabama Ledge Wind Farm in Genesee County, New York

Digging Deeper SOLAR ENERGY. Forms of Solar Energy

CHAPTER 725. Solar Farms.

20-CSP Technologies. ECEGR 452 Renewable Energy Systems

Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality. Volume 1 Addendum 2

Solar System Analysis

ASI Glass. Integrated Architecture Powered by the Sun

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ASI GLASS E. ASI Glass. Integrated Architecture Powered by the Sun

Managing Light & Daylight Efficiently for Tropical Office Buildings

6KW Grid Interactive Photovoltaic System

ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES

CMPA Campus Wide Solar Array Installation 2 of 4

AR No. # - Solar Thermal

Appendix K Shadow Flicker Study

Performance Evaluation of Solar Parabolic Trough for Cloths Laundry application

Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

TITLE 7, CHAPTER 7 TAZEWELL COUNTY SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Effect of Building Shape And Neighborhood Design On Solar Potential And Energy Performance

The energy benefits of View Dynamic Glass

UNIT FOUR SOLAR COLLECTORS

A New Type of Hybrid Groundwater Energy System

APPENDIX R SHADOW FLICKER REPORT

UW-Rock County Solar Project

ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF SHADING ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS

An enhancement of the daylighting from side-window using two-section venetian blind

SAFEGUARDING. Aviation Consultancy at its best.

FY2017 SREC Registration Program (SRP) Final As-Built Technical Worksheet Instructions Page 1

Photovoltaic Potential Assessment to Support Renewable Energies Growth in 10 EU Candidate Countries

Introduction to Photovoltaic (PV) Facilities

An innovative HCP/T collector and its potential SHC applications

Bifacial simulation in SAM

MARKET PRICES FOR SOLAR ELECTRICITY IN ONTARIO

SOLAR ENERGY ASSESSMENT REPORT. For 80.5 kwp. Meteorological Data Source NASA-SSE. Date 18 October, Name of Place Uttar Pradesh.

Solar and Wind Energy

Concentrated Solar Power (CSP)

Charles Weems, Chairperson, Residential Wind Power Subcommittee. Response to Council Referral in the Viability of Residential Wind Power in Berkeley

Solar PV Performance and New Technologies in Northern Latitude Regions

Green Star Photovoltaic Modelling Guidelines

Retscreen method used to quantify current shading estimates.

Clean Energy Extension

Shading systems and sustainable design

SECTION SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM

12/04/15 AC 70/7460-1L CHAPTER 13. MARKING AND LIGHTING WIND TURBINES

Estimate the size of the solar and hydro power resources in kw. [5 Marks]

Local Solar PV Systems Update

The mapping of maximum annual energy yield azimuth and tilt angles for photovoltaic installations at all locations in South Africa

UT Zero-Energy House Screen House University of Tennessee, Knoxville Arc 572 I Spring 2008

ORDINANCE NO. Commercial WECS: A WECS of equal to or greater than 15 kw in total name plate generating capacity.

CSI Incentive Calculator User Guide

PV Module Right-Sizing for Microinverters

Does a PV Tracking System Make Sense for Co-ops?

How do weather, environment and location affect solar?

Roof mounted solar panels on Bldg L, Verde Valley Campus. 1. One developed Acre can produce approx 100 KW of peak solar power.

TITLE 9 CHAPTER 4 SOLAR ENERGY

A CASE STUDY OF A RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM WITH MICROINVERTERS

Walmart Energy. Image Area. September 2015

Understanding Solar Energy Teacher Page

California Solar and New Solar Home Initiatives The Rater s Role

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 7, No 2, 2016

SECTION 25: WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS (WECS)

Solar Shading System Based on Daylight Directing Glass Lamellas

SOLARONIX. Maintenance costs for solar simulators with various lighting technologies.

AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM ORDINANCE FOR DEKALB COUNTY

PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS AND METRICS

Utilization of Unmanned System Technology in Transportation Engineering

Wastewater Flow Monitoring Services

SAGEGLASS VARIABLE TINTED GLAZING INPUT SHEET FOR DIAL+ SOFTWARE

Simulation of a Combined Solar and Wind Power Farm. Economic analysis

CARLTON COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY ORDINANCE #32

SECTION 25: RENEWABLE ENERGY ORDINANCE

MURRAY COUNTY WIND ENERGY ORDINANCE

PROPOSED INCENTIVES TO REDUCE CANADA S CARBON EMISSIONS. July 2017

MISO Distributed Generation (DG) Presentation. October 27, 2015

Renewable Energy Technology MJ2411

REPORT REF: SFAUSVICXXMOR.1 SHADOW FLICKER AND BLADE GLINT REPORT

Design of Grid Connected PV System Using Pvsyst

Building Energy Efficiency Standards Mandatory measures minimum features that all buildings must have regardless of compliance method used.

Photovoltaic (PV) Arrays

New solar shading system based on daylight directing solar glass lamellas

Study of Daylight in Genzyme. Courtney Browne Siân Kleindienst Ed Rice

CHAPTER 14 WIND AND SOLAR ENERGY

AVERAGE PRICE (INSTALLED) CAD$ 2.80 ± 0.10 / Watt (DC) 38% DROP* 6.4% DROP* AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY 1087 ± 34 kwh/kw per year NO CHANGE NO CHANGE

More affordable solar energy using astronomical know-how. Roger Angel, University of Arizona and REhnu Inc

Building Solar Friendly Roofs

ROOF-MOUNTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND GREEN ROOFS - DISCRETIONARY HEIGHT INCREASES

ARCH-MEDES (I) CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. Green Park Delhi

DynoRaxx EVOLUTION PR Guide to Code Compliant Installation

AR No. # - Install Photovoltaic Array

Contents. What is a solar water pump? 3-4. Smart Solar Water 5-6. Small Centrifugal Pump Systems 7. MPPT Diaphragm Pump Systems 8

Transcription:

FORGESOLAR GLARE ANALYSIS Project: Delta County Airport (ESC) Escanaba Glare Assessment Site configuration: Delta Ariport Sim_35 Degree Analysis conducted by Brad Norling (Bradley.norling@westwoodps.com) at 22:45 on 14 Nov, 2017. U.S. FAA 2013 Policy Adherence The following table summarizes the policy adherence of the glare analysis based on the 2013 U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Interim Policy 78 FR 63276. This policy requires the following criteria be met for solar energy systems on airport property: No "yellow" glare (potential for after-image) for any flight path from threshold to 2 miles No glare of any kind for Air Traffic Control Tower(s) ("ATCT") at cab height. Default analysis and observer characteristics (see list below) ForgeSolar does not represent or speak officially for the FAA and cannot approve or deny projects. Results are informational only. COMPONENT STATUS DESCRIPTION Analysis parameters PASS Analysis time interval and eye characteristics used are acceptable Flight path(s) PASS Flight path receptor(s) do not receive yellow glare ATCT(s) N/A No ATCT receptors designated Default glare analysis and observer eye characteristics are as follows: Analysis time interval: 1 minute Ocular transmission coefficient: 0.5 Pupil diameter: 0.002 meters Eye focal length: 0.017 meters Sun subtended angle: 9.3 milliradians FAA Policy 78 FR 63276 can be read at https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2013-24729

SITE CONFIGURATION Analysis Parameters DNI: peaks at 1,000.0 W/m^2 Time interval: 1 min Ocular transmission coefficient: 0.5 Pupil diameter: 0.002 m Eye focal length: 0.017 m Sun subtended angle: 9.3 mrad Site Config ID: 11270.1950 PV Array(s) Name: 35 Deg PV Axis tracking: Fixed (no rotation) Tilt: 35.0 Orientation: 180.0 Rated power: 10000.0 kw Panel material: Smooth glass without AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun Slope error: 6.55 mrad Vertex Latitude ( ) Longitude ( ) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 45.718564-87.104151 595.08 6.00 601.08 2 45.718500-87.098370 596.05 6.00 602.05 3 45.718143-87.098357 595.92 6.00 601.92 4 45.717747-87.098346 594.64 6.00 600.64 5 45.717740-87.104180 597.00 6.00 603.00

Flight Path Receptor(s) Name: FP 1 Direction: 271.0 Threshold 45.720824-87.111304 611.44 50.00 661.44 Two-mile 45.721329-87.152759 681.32 533.58 1214.90 Name: FP 2 Direction: 90.96 Threshold 45.720560-87.087167 595.49 50.00 645.49 Two-mile 45.720076-87.045711 563.45 635.49 1198.94 Name: FP 3 Direction: 181.0 Threshold 45.718905-87.086735 595.31 50.00 645.32 Two-mile 45.689997-87.087458 573.85 624.93 1198.77

Name: FP 4 Direction: 1.0 Threshold 45.731613-87.086445 608.70 50.00 658.70 Two-mile 45.760521-87.085721 626.64 585.52 1212.16 GLARE ANALYSIS RESULTS Summary of Glare PV Array Name Tilt Orient "Green" Glare "Yellow" Glare Energy ( ) ( ) min min kwh 35 Deg PV 35.0 180.0 29 0 23,520,000.0 Total annual glare received by each receptor Receptor Annual Green Glare (min) Annual Yellow Glare (min) FP 1 1 0 FP 2 12 0 FP 3 16 0 FP 4 0 0 Results for: 35 Deg PV Receptor Green Glare (min) Yellow Glare (min) FP 1 1 0 FP 2 12 0 FP 3 16 0

Receptor Green Glare (min) Yellow Glare (min) FP 4 0 0 Flight Path: FP 1 1 minutes of green glare Flight Path: FP 2 12 minutes of green glare

Flight Path: FP 3 16 minutes of green glare

Flight Path: FP 4 0 minutes of green glare Assumptions "Green" glare is glare with low potential to cause an after-image (flash blindness) when observed prior to a typical blink response time. "Yellow" glare is glare with potential to cause an after-image (flash blindness) when observed prior to a typical blink response time. Times associated with glare are denoted in Standard time. For Daylight Savings, add one hour. Glare analyses do not account for physical obstructions between reflectors and receptors. This includes buildings, tree cover and geographic obstructions. The glare hazard determination relies on several approximations including observer eye characteristics, angle of view, and typical blink response time. Actual values may differ. Hazard zone boundaries shown in the Glare Hazard plot are an approximation and visual aid based on aggregated research data. Actual ocular impact outcomes encompass a continuous, not discrete, spectrum. 2015-2017 Sims Industries, All Rights Reserved.