Wildlife Health Risk Assessment in Support of Decisions and Policies

Similar documents
Wildlife Health Risk Assessment in Support of Decisions and Policies

Slide 1 PEST RISK ANALYSIS. ISPM N 2 NOV 2006 ISPM N 11 April A Free sample background from

The Global FAO-OIE FMD Control Strategy

PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF MICROBIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT CAC/GL Adopted Amendments 2012, 2014.

DRAFT APHIS-CFIA FAD Zoning Framework March 19, 2014

Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment

FMD Situation in Lebanon 2016 Dr. Bassel El Bazzal

i) Wild animals: Those animals that do not live under human supervision or control and do not have their phenotype selected by humans.

FAO Fisheries Department s A. Role in Research B. Aquatic Animal Health Initiatives

National Farm Animal Care Conference October 5-6, Responding to Consumer and Market Realities

IUCN/SSC Guidelines for Re-Introductions

OIE Standard on principles and methods of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases

Self-Assessment Checklist for Enhanced Biosecurity for FMD Prevention: Beef Feedlots

Final Report. Some key points which were highlighted during the meeting included:

LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORKS AFFECTING THE MANAGEMENT OF ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES Country: Jordan

PEST RISK ANALYSIS FOR REGULATED NON-QUARANTINE PESTS

OIE Regional Commission for Asia, the Far East and Oceania. Second Regional Work Plan Framework

Updated April Defra s approach to biosecurity

the language of pork production

Control of veterinary products and vaccines Inspection system, monitoring plan, monitoring of vaccines distribution

ICPALD/IGAD Dr. Wamalwa Kinyanjui

Republic of Serbia Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection VETERINARY DIRECTORATE. Biosecurity on pig farms and holdings in Serbia

MARITIME FORUM. PROFET POLICY: Fish policy flow: outcome of FP6 research programme

FESASS STRONGER TOGETHER! STRATEGIC PLAN. Fédération Européenne pour la Santé Animale et la Sécurité Sanitaire

Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü. PM 317 Human and Environment Assoc. Prof. Dr. Salih GÜCEL

OVERVIEW FOR ALL LEVELS. diversity of organisations affected by plant health

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONS OF TROPICAL VETERINARY MEDICINE

AGRICULTURE AND BIORESOURCES

Main concepts and suggested approach

OIE Reference Laboratory Reports Activities

OIE Procedure for Validation and Certification of Diagnostic Assays

Application of the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework in Belize

Supporting OIE animal welfare standards: Australia s Approach

Science Based Biosecurity Risk Assessment. OECD Consumer Product Safety Risk Assessment Workshop. Dr Colin Grant Professor Mark Burgman

Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) Risk Assessment

BIOSECURITY FOR FISH FARMERS

Ecosystem Services Identification, Valuation & Integration (ESIVI) Strategic Sustainability and Climate Change Team, London

01 Introduction - 1 Livestock Ecology: A Definition

Regional Animal Welfare Strategy for Asia, the Far East and Oceania: Draft Implementation Plan. Prepared by the RAWS Implementation Working Group

Informal Consultation for Europe and Central Asia May 2017, Budapest, Hungary

Roadmap. for Sustainable. EU Livestock

2) #32 from Part A of the BAgribus list (Please note that there are #34 core courses listed but AGRC1010 will count towards the BAppSc component.

Health Governance in Canada

Melissa McLaws Chris Bartels

Origin of report. Contact officer for report

NLPFP PARALLEL MEETING By Dr Pierre BUKURU. April 14 th 19 th 2013, Abidjan, Ivory Coast

The Precautionary Principle Project sustainable development, biodiversity conservation and natural resource management

Environment Canada and Health Canada

TRACEABILITY OPTIONS FOR THE CANADIAN PORK INDUSTRY

National Biosecurity Capability Network. Biosecurity Response Operations: Team Member

RECOMMENDATION ADOPTED BY THE SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE XX/7. INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS NINTH MEETING

Introduction to Risk Based Strategic Plan. Dr. Gunel Ismayilova (EuFMD)

PREPARATION of the 6 th OIE STRATEGIC PLAN

Self-Assessment Checklist for Enhanced Biosecurity for FMD Prevention: Cattle on Pasture

Preparation of the Sixth Strategic Plan of the OIE for

ISPM No. 6 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEILLANCE (1997)

Key conservation policies and their targets

Retail and Commercial Banking Delivery Channel Masterclass This course can also be presented in-house for your company or via live on-line webinar

RISK ASSESSMENT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED MICRO-ORAGNISMS: A FORMAT THAT OFFERS ONE POSSIBLE WAY OF ACHIEVING GOOD PRACTICE

Functional Area Assessment FAQ

Policy and strategy development in aquaculture in Bosnia and Herzegovina

THE 6 th OIE STRATEGIC PLAN Period

Forest Health Program

INFECTIOUS MYONECROSIS

The Next Generation of Mitigation: Linking Current and Future Mitigation Programs with State Wildlife Action Plans and Other State and Regional Plans

Review of the Availability and Accuracy. of Information about Forests: Phase I Report

Work of the FAO Development Law Branch (LEGN) in the areas of veterinary legislation

Alberta Alberta is proud to provide safe, consistent, high-quality agriculture and food products for consumers around the world.

OVERVIEW FOR ALL LEVELS. diversity of organisations affected by plant health

2nd PPR & 4th FMD Roadmap Meetings for Middle East Amman, October PPR Global Eradication Programme Overview FAO/OIE PPR Secretariat

Served in the grade of Principal Livestock Production Officer for a minimum period of three (3) years

FAO and OIE International Conference for the Control and Eradication of Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) Abidjan 31 March 2 April 2015

REGIONAL ANIMAL WELFARE STRATEGY. Asia, the Far East and Oceania

CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES

EU Animal Welfare Strategy

Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan for Food Security and Agriculture Programmes

SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION: WHAT ROLES FOR LIVESTOCK?

RFP No: WB/MOF/MINIS/CS/CQS/1.1.9 (d)/2014. A. Background

National Standard for Environmental Risk Management of Industrial Chemicals

Overview of the International and European framework for plant health legislation. Wednesday 27 th July 2011, Bangkok

Outcomes of FAOs regional cooperation project in the Western Balkans successes and challanges

Capacity building to implement good animal welfare practices

April 2016 PC 119/3. Hundred and Nineteenth Session. Rome, May Update on FAO's work on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Executive Summary

Constrains and Solutions to Reduce Environmental Impact for Developed Livestock Farming

Environmental Science Institute The University of Texas at Austin Biological Weapons and Bioterrorism Dr. Brent L. Iverson

NIAA Resolutions

Governance in practice: Connecting key role players through the development and implementation of a Research Uptake Strategy

PEST RISK ANALYSIS FOR QUARANTINE PESTS

USE OF SYNERGIES IN THE REVIEW, UPDATING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN : THE CASE OF UGANDA

The Blue Revolution - A veterinary perspective

The definitions given below have been selected and restricted to those that are likely to be useful to users of this OIE Terrestrial Manual.

Pre-CCAFRICA Workshop National Food Control Systems. January 28 th 2013, Yaoundé (Cameroon) Presentation by Mali

MPharm programme in Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology

Science and Values in Radiological Protection Decision-making

FIRST REGULAR NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY. Origin of report. Chief Science Secretary

Transcription:

Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative Réseau Canadien de la santé de la faune Training Workshop for OIE Focal Points for Wildlife Wildlife Health Risk Assessment in Support of Decisions and Policies OIE Collaborating Centre on Research Diagnosis and Surveillance for Wildlife Pathogens Canada

CANADA Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative Réseau Canadien de la santé de la faune

Western College of Veterinary Medicine Prof. Ted Leighton

Dr. Patrick Leighton Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Montreal Prof. Ted Leighton

Workshop Program Two main topics 1. Wildlife Health Risk Assessment Practical Qualitative Many applications 2. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Fitting Risk Assessment into the bigger decision framework Decision analysis for better decisions Slide 5

Workshop Program Learning Tools Workbook Notes, Reference material, exercises Presentations and Discussion All information is in the Workbook Risk Analysis and MCDA in small groups You will do a wildlife health risk assessment You will do a multi-criterion decision analysis Slide 6

Wildlife Health Risk Assessment What is Risk? Risk has Two Components 1. The probability of an event occurring 2. The magnitude of the consequences if it does occur Slide 7

Wildlife Health Risk Assessment What Is Wildlife Health Risk Assessment? A standard method used to evaluate potential health risks in activities involving wildlife A rigorous & disciplined application of common sense OIE Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Health Codes Slide 8

Wildlife Health Risk Assessment Why Do Wildlife Health Risk Assessment? Wildlife Translocation moving wild animals - always includes potential health risks The health risks may be negligible The health risks may be very high Health Risk Assessment allows you to evaluate risks before wildlife translocations or other actions they are carried out Slide 9

How to do it Seven steps in health risk assessment 1. The Translocation Plan 2. Identify the consequences to be assessed 3. Identify the health hazards to be assessed 4. Assess risk for the selected health hazards 5. Statement of overall risk & degree of uncertainty 6. Identify any additional hazards and risks 7. Identify options to reduce health risks Slide 10

Health Risk Assessment: Table-top Exercise in Small Groups You will now do as Health Risk Assessment for a proposed translocation of American Bison from Canada to Atlantis Workbook Page 45 Slide 11

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Quickly read pages 45-48 for general orientation (5 minutes) Who is requesting a health risk assessment? Who else is concerned about the bison translocation? Slide 12

Quickly read pages 45-48 for general orientation Who is requesting a health risk assessment? Who else is concerned about the bison translocation? Sheep farmers Aboriginal people Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Animal Rights & Welfare NGO Aggregate Exports Inc. Business Association Natural History Club Slide 13

Step 1 : The Translocation Plan Find out EXACTLY what is planned Number of animals, sex, age, dates, capture, transport Source and destination ecosystems Quarantine, health management, feed, release process These details will affect the risk assessment Find out what the decision-makers really need to know about health risks To make sure the Risk Assessment answers the right questions Slide 14

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis The Translocation Plan A. Read the Translocation Plan Pages 49-50 (5 minutes) B. Source and Destination Ecosystems Divide your group in two halves One half read Source Ecosystem (pg 50-52) One half read Destination Ecosystem: (pg 53-55) 10 minutes Each half present the main features of the Source and Destination ecosystems to the other half of the group - 5 minutes each Slide 15

Step 2 : Selection of Consequences to be Included There are many different kinds of negative consequences that might be associated with the health hazards of a wildlife translocation Decide which consequences to include and to exclude in the health risk assessment Essential for transparency Often determined by the agency requesting the health risk assessment Essential to defining knowledge required on risk assessment team The consequences selected determine the content, scale and usefulness of a health risk assessment Slide 16

Some Categories of Consequences or Potential Negative Impacts Step 2 Consequences for: Animal Health Animal Welfare Human Health Human Economies Environments and Ecological Services Human Social, Cultural and Psychological Well-being Politics and Governance National Security Slide 17

Who are the Stakeholders? All the people and organisations affected in some way by the potential health hazards Important participants in Step 1 and Step 2 Could include (at both Source and Destination locations): Government agencies: wildlife, agriculture, health, other Local communities, business, land-owners Non-government groups International organizations: trade, conservation, health Identifying the main stakeholders can help select the consequences to be included in the health risk assessment Reflect stakeholder concerns (see Page 27) Step 2 Slide 18

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Selection of Consequences to be considered (15 minutes) Work together as a group at each table Follow the instructions on pages 56-59 Slide 19

: Identification of Health Hazards A. Make a comprehensive list of ALL possible health hazards. 1. Pathogens & diseases present in the source ecosystem that could be carried into the destination ecosystem by the translocated animals 2. Pathogens & diseases present in the destination ecosystem that could harm the translocated animals Include pathogens in wildlife, domestic animals and people at source and destination Slide 20

: Identification of Health Hazards B. Select a small number (2-4) of the most important health hazards for full assessment Selection criteria - emphasize health hazards that: 1. Could be carried by translocated animals into the destination ecosystem and May infect wildlife, domestic animals or people and May have significant consequences if this occurs 2. Are present in the destination ecosystem and May cause significant harm to the animals being translocated Slide 21

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Identification of Health Hazards (20 minutes) Workbook Pages 60-67 Please read and follow instructions Slide 22

: Assessment of Health Risks Assess the health risks for each health hazard you have selected in for full risk assessment a) The probability that the hazard will occur b) The magnitude of consequences or harm if it does occur This takes a lot of time! Slide 23

Qualitative or Quantitative Health Risk Assessment Qualitative: - levels of risk Negligible, Low, Medium, High Most wildlife health risk assessments are qualitative Quantitative: - precise numerical values Step 4 11.3% chance (CI: 0%-100%) of $1 billion (CI: $0 - $10 billion) economic loss Data for quantitative wildlife health risk assessment seldom exist Slide 24

: Assessment of Health Risks Assessing Risk What to do For Each Selected Health Hazard (pathogen) 1. Estimate the probability that the pathogen will arrive in the destination ecosystem ( entry assessment ) (Negligible Low Medium High) 2. Estimate the probability that susceptible species in the destination environment will be exposed to the pathogen ( exposure assessment ) (Negligible Low Medium High) Slide 25

: Assessment of Health Risks Assessing Risk What to do 3. Estimate the magnitude of consequences if the pathogen infects susceptible species in the destination ecosystem For each of the categories of consequences to be included in the Risk Assessment. (Negligible Low Medium High) Slide 26

: Assessment of Health Risks Assessing Risk What to do 4. Estimate the probability that the translocated animals will be exposed to the pathogen in the destination ecosystem (Negligible Low Medium High) 5. Estimate the magnitude of consequences if the pathogen infects the translocated animals in the destination ecosystem For each of the categories of consequences to be included in the Risk Assessment. (Negligible Low Medium High) Slide 27

E.G.: : Assessment of Health Risks So, How can you do this? Estimate the probability that the pathogen will arrive in the destination ecosystem ( entry assessment ) (Negligible Low Medium High) Slide 28

: Assessment of Health Risks Information needed for entry assessment Some examples: Identity and ecology of the disease-causing agent Anticipated range and distribution of the released animals Presence/absence of potential pathogen vectors Calendar period of translocation and release Primary, secondary and intermediate hosts of the disease-causing agent in the destination ecosystem: number, variety and distribution Number and distribution of people and animals in the destination ecosystem Mode of transmission of the pathogen Relevant customs and cultural practices in the destination ecosystem Animal health legislation and compliance Biotic and abiotic factors that affect the pathogen s survival (See Workbook page 31-32) Slide 29

: Qualitative Assessment of Health Risks Guidelines Estimating and rating qualitatively the probability that a pathogen will enter the destination ecosystem with the translocated animals. Rating = Negligible Rating = Low Rating = Medium Rating = High The probability of entry is extremely low or negligible given the combination of factors described above. The probability of entry is low but clearly possible given the combination of factors described above. Entry is likely, given the combination of factors described above. Entry is very likely or certain, given the combination of factors described above. (See Workbook page 32) Slide 30

: Assessment of Health Risks Judge the health risk: The health risk associated with this pathogen is (negligible low medium high) This is your judgement: Objective & Subjective elements Must balance and weight: probability of occurrence Magnitude of negative consequences There is no formula for making this judgement You must fully explain your reasoning (See workbook page 39) Slide 31

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Risk Assessment for Selected Health Hazards (30 minutes) Workbook pages 68-74 Please read and follow instructions Slide 32

Step 5 : Assessment of Overall Health Risk The health risk associated with this wildlife translocation is (negligible, low, medium, high) Combine the risk assessment for each pathogen into an overall risk assessment for the proposed wildlife translocation A judgement objective and subjective for which there is no formula Fully explain your reasoning Slide 33

Step 5 : Assessment of Overall Health Risk - Workbook page 75 ( 10 minutes) Slide 34

Step 5 : Additional hazards and risks [This step is Omitted from this tabletop exercise] Did you identify important risks not associated with animal health? If so, list them here, to alert the decisionmakers. Sometimes this step is included, sometimes not See Workbook pages 42-43 Slide 35

Small Group Exercise - Bison for Atlantis Reduction of Risk The assessor (you!) often can identify ways in which health risks could be reduced Changes to the Translocation Plan : quarantine, vaccination, different source for the animals, etc. List and explain all such possibilities, alternatives, options Workbook page 77 Please read and Follow instructions Slide 36

Wildlife Health Risk Assessment Who can do a wildlife health risk assessment? You can! Does not require a specialist in risk assessment Best done by a small team with some knowledge of: The biology and diseases of species involved The source and destination environments The main consequences of concern: economics, human health, livestock health, etc. Slide 37

Wildlife Health Risk Assessment Who should NOT do a wildlife health risk assessment? The Stakeholders in the wildlife translocation or other wildlife activity, in favour or opposed Government decision-makers and managers Businesses, land owners, conservationist, etc. The risk assessment must be: Independent of the stakeholders Transparent to everyone Slide 38