Pentagon City PDSP Amendment. Site Plan #105 PenPlace

Similar documents
Revenues and expenditures increase based on the tax district increase due to increases in real estate assessments in CY 2016 compared to CY 2015.

CRYSTAL CITY, POTOMAC YARD, AND PENTAGON CITY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AREA

Alexandria City Council Arlington County Board Joint Work Session

Wheaton PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS

Washington Boulevard and Kirkwood Road Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study Plus. Agenda Item #43

Prepared By: Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX Methodology Letter of Understanding (MLOU) and Agency Correspondence

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, SUBJECT: Green Building Density Incentive Policy for Site Plan Projects

Regional Transit Framework Study

Site Criteria Evaluation Matrix

CHAPTER 2: Goals, Objectives & Standards

LEED for Neighborhood Development

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT SLX DCI MAJOR MODIFICATION AND VARIANCE

Going Beyond LEED-ND. NAIOP Green Series 2008 Pat Dawe RNL

EXAMPLE SMART GROWTH LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT EVALUATION FORM Prepared by the Broward County Planning Council April 22, 2010

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

Chapter Six Future Transportation and Land Use

STAFF REPORT. Planning Commission. Anjanette Simon, Associate Planner

Urban Development Areas Amherst County

Net Zero Main Street. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments March 19, 2014 John Miller Flywheel Development

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

North Woodbridge Urban Mixed Use Master Zoning Plan

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Village Mixed Use Land Use Designation. Village Mixed Use Zoning District

CITY OF ST. MICHAEL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. MICHAEL HEREBY ORDAINS:

STATUS REPORT ON THE UPDATE TO THE NORTH SAN JOSE AREA DEVELOPMENT POLICY

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

Project Plan and Financing Plan for Reinvestment Zone Number Two,

Solar Ready Homes/Solar Oriented Developments Residential Stakeholder Meeting

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Business Item: Community Development Committee. Proposed Action. Background. Rationale. Funding. Known Support / Opposition

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

Transportation Category. New Location and. Green Vehicles. Reduced Parking Footprint. Bicycle Facilities. Access to Quality Transit

Ensuring a Competitive and Sustainable Community

Community Development Committee

2016 MAJOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT

INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROBABLE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (SECTION (d))

Assessment for Non-Traditional. Ilona Kastenhofer & Robert Hofrichter

Department of Environmental Services

Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Administrative Guidelines

DC s next wave of office space is here

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK-AND-RIDE DEMAND ESTIMATION STUDY

Regional Bus Rapid Transit

Appendix E: Air Quality Tables

CP-3. Planned Commercial District-3. Section Use. Buildings and lots in the CP-3 district may be used for the following purposes:

Policy on LEED Certification

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

To Market, To Market. Discussion Contents. Part 1: Land Use & Infrastructure

ES.1 Solids Master Planning Background and Goals

wheaton s future Wheaton s Role in the County

WTiF. What Is Affordable Housing? Overview What Is Affordable Housing? Impacts of Infrastructure Investments Recommendations

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

MARKET COMMON CLARENDON - PH II - SP #339 AMENDMENT Arlington, VA

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

Executive Summary. Study Background

BAY MEADOWS II TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

Chapter 2 Transportation Element Goals, Objectives and Policies

SECTION 5. Existing Conditions TRANSPORTATION NETWORK TRANSPORTATION

Office / Retail Building For Lease Nian c (East Lyme), CT

Mr. Adam Tartakovsky Crescent Heights Development 450 Sansome Street, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA July 15, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

# 14 ) ZN AMERICAN DIALYSIS CENTER OF NORTH LAS VEGAS M-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO M-1, BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING

Best value MARK CENTER. Welcome to Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA

BAY MEADOWS II TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

Creating Sustainable Neighborhoods

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

April 12, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting. Landfill Energy Systems

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

MARION COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2035

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Loudoun County Government Support Center Integrated Energy Plan

Hillsborough County Future Land Use 160

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

Pike Ride: Creating a Successful Product Image

Tenth Community Meeting

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

Appendix H Solar Energy Systems (SES) (Revised Ord. No )

Geoplanner Applications. Aziz Bakkoury GIS Specialist City Planning Department City of Los Angeles

APPENDIX F. Sacramento Commons Climate Change Documentation

Part 6 Appendices & Schedules

Chapter 3: Growth Forecasts and Model Assumptions

Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Administrative Guidelines

Market-to-Market Market influences on Transportation and Development. Dawn Cartier & Tom Hester January 2015

Traffic generated by future approved, planned or potential development activity.

5 February 12, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: ERIK HOMES, L.L.C.

Michael J. Usen, AICP Sustainability Program Coordinator King County Metro Transit Seattle, Washington

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW THE WHARF PHASE 2 PUD

Photo by Michael Day

Woodlake General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: MAY 20, 2010

November 8, RE: Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Detailed Traffic Impact Study Review. Dear Mr. Rowe:

ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

CITY OF SCANDIA ORDINANCE NO. 193

Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal

Transcription:

Pentagon City PDSP Amendment Site Plan #105 PenPlace County Board September 21, 2013

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Actions 1. TDR Certification of Teardrop Parcel as a sending site 2. TDR Certification of PenPlace as the receiving site for Teardrop Parcel density 3. TDR Certification of PenPlace as the receiving site for North Tract density 4. TDR Certification of PenPlace as a sending site for TDR density 5. Approval of the PDSP Amendment request 14

GLUP Designation Medium 15

Zoning Designation Parcel 1D 16

Density 1976 Pentagon City Master Development Plan Lowest densities should be in the south portion of the tract, adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods. Highest densities, including office buildings, commercial uses and hotels, should be in the north and east portions of the site for ease of access to major traffic arteries, and the Metro rail station. 17

Density 2011 PenPlace Guiding Principles C. Distribution of Densities and Height 1. The highest densities of the Pentagon City PDSP area should be planned for Parcel 1D given its close proximity to existing and future transit nodes, and given the site s distance from low-density residential areas. 2. Additional density should be considered for this site and could be achieved through TDRs/density transfers and the provision of extraordinary community benefits. 18

Surrounding Density 19

Density Amounts Parcel 1D Requested Density 300 Hotel Units 50,000 sf Retail 1,809,000 sf Office Existing Density 882 Hotel Units (299 built) 930 Residential Units 20

Requested Density Amounts 300 Hotel Units + 1,859,000 sf Known Density Amounts Additional Density Amounts 21

Known Density Amounts 610,959 sf TDR from North Tract 422,675 sf Hotel unit conversion 119,467 sf Teardrop & ROW 300 Hotel Units Total = 1,153,101 sq.ft. of GFA + 300 Hotel Units 22

PenPlace Density Amounts 1,153,101 sf + 300 Hotel Units 705,899 sf TDR from North Tract 610,951 sf Hotel unit conversion 422,675 sf Teardrop & ROW 119,467 sf 300 Hotel Units Additional Density Amounts 1,859,000 sf + 300 Hotel Units 23

PenPlace Additional Density Amounts TDR LEED ADU Bonus Community Facilities Bonus Open Space/Environmental Contribution 705,899 sf Gross Floor Area (GFA) 24

Land Use 25

Land Use 26

LEED / Sustainability Office LEED Gold and LEED-EBOM (operations certification) 4-pipe hydronic heating/cooling for potential district energy (DE) connection Residential/hotel LEED Silver Center domestic hot water for potential DE connection Each site plan Update concept plan to interconnect all buildings for potential future on-site DE system Meet with staff to evaluate innovative energy solutions (DE, solar, combined heat/power, etc.) 27

Existing Transportation Network: MTP Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Identifies area as planned for new Streets 12 th Street as part of the Primary Transit Network 28

Existing Transportation Network: Multi-Modal Network Within ¼ Mile: Pentagon City Metrorail Station Future Streetcar Station Numerous Local and Regional Bus Routes I-395/I-395 HOV Facilities Route 1 and Route 110 Within ½ Mile: Pentagon Metrorail /Metrobus Transfer Center Crystal City Metrorail Station VRE Crystal City Station Approximately 1 Mile: Ronald Reagan National Airport Mount Vernon Bike/Ped Trail 29

Historic Traffic Count Data 24 Permanent Count Station in 22202 Prior to First Development on PenPlace PDSP 30

Transportation Infrastructure in CIP for 22202 FY 2013 FY 2022 Capital Improvements Plan - Transit: $213 Million in Transit Investments 31 31

Transportation Infrastructure in CIP for 22202 FY 2013 FY 2022 Capital Improvements Plan - Streets: $88 Million in Street Investments 32 32

Transportation Demand Management 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% TDM Plans to Approved for Each Final Site Plan. Performance Monitoring included for each building and the PDSP for the life of the site plan. 62% 47% 40% 21% 44% 38% Low TDM Moderate TDM High TDM 10% 6% 7% 6% 7% 7% Drive Alone Transit Bike/walk CP / VP Smart Growth Planning Policies and Land Use Patterns TDM: Information, Assistance, and Incentives Transportation Infrastructure, Facilities & Services 33

Army Navy Drive Cycle Track Existing Army Navy Drive 34 34

South Eads Street Cycle Track 35

South Eads Street Cycle Track 36

Parking Ratios Applicants Proposal Office/Retail = 1 space per 900 sq. ft. GFA Hotel = 0.5 spaces per Room Residential = 1 space per Unit Staff Recommendation for Office/Retail Set Parking Maximum at 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Minimum Parking at 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Allow minimum parking to be further decreased at the time of Final Site Plan Approval based on the current policies for reducing commercial parking. 37

Key Transportation Elements of the PDSP With Approval of PenPlace 12 th Street right-of-way to be dedication; 12 th Street to be constructed timed generally with Met 4&5; Teardrop parcel is dedicated to the County for a potential; Streetcar Operations and Maintenance Facility; Eads Street to be improved with a new asphalt sidewalk from Army Navy Drive to 12 th Street South. With Approval of Final Site Plans Construction of new internal street grid; Improve sidewalks and streetscape on all frontages; Transit oriented public open space; TDM and performance monitoring. 38

Urban Design Framework Design Guidelines 39

Urban Design Framework Design Guidelines Core Elements: 1. Transportation / Streets 2. Open Space 3. Buildings / Architecture 4. Appendix addressing a Secure Facility Design Guideline Follow-up: In accordance with Condition #98 39

Secure Facility Elements for Consideration PenPlace Elements for Consideration in Siting a Secure Facility 1. Building standoff distances 2. Moving planned or built streets 3. Closing planned or built streets to vehicular traffic 4. Adjusting the location and size of secure office building footprints 5. Adjusting adjacent building footprints 6. Limitations on ground floor uses 7. Changes to building design/architecture for the purposes of building hardening 8. Secure parking with limited to no public parking 9. Adjustments to parking ratios that result in reduced parking 10. Moving the location of planned open space 11. Design and use of the planned open space 12. Reduction of total land area of publicly-accessible open space

Issues for Discussion 1. TDR sending site 2. Parking Ratio 3. Residential option 4. Final Design Guidelines 42

Staff Recommendations 1. Approve the Teardrop Parcel as a TDR sending site 2. Approve PenPlace as a receiving site for the TDR density from the Teardrop Parcel 3. Approve PenPlace as a receiving site for the TDR density from the North Tract 4. Take No Action to certify PenPlace as a TDR sending site 5. Approve the PDSP Amendment request, as recommended 43