Particulate Matter Rules Update BAAQMD BACWA Meeting

Similar documents
Barry Young CAPCOA Engineering & Toxics Symposium October 31, 2018

Regulatory and Voluntary Efforts in Addressing Particulate Matter and Black Carbon in the U.S UNECE/LRTAP/WGSR. Geneva. April 2013

Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy

Last updated September Fugitive Dust. Fugitive Dust. Training Presentation

Greater Vancouver Regional District Concrete and Concrete Products Industries Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1084, 2008

GE 2211 Environmental Science and Engineering Unit III Air Pollution. M. Subramanian

Agenda. Background PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop

Lecture 4 Air Pollution: Particulates METR113/ENVS113 SPRING 2011 MARCH 15, 2011

4.3 AIR QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Physical Setting. Criteria Air Pollutants and Effects

Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (

Protect AQ & public health. Governing Board: Large, complex region: 9 counties / 101 cities > 7 million people > 5 million vehicles

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Board of Directors Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan

Air Pollution Sources Overview. Amy Roberts, Division Manager January 24, 2019

Water and air, the two essential fluids on which all life depends, have become global garbage cans. Jacques-Yves Cousteau

TECHNICAL FACT SHEET September 24, 2018

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

3 CONSTRUCTION-GENERATED CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT AND PRECURSOR EMISSIONS

Twomile Ecological Restoration Project Air Quality Report Anna Payne, Mi-Wok District Fuels Specialists August 2011

CHAPTER 2 - Air Quality Trends and Comparisons

BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Update

Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC) Mitigating Impacts of Outdoor Air Quality on Indoor Air Quality in Berkeley

Fugitive Dust Management Plan

Executive Summary PM2.5 Plan. SJVUAPCD Executive Summary. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District December 20, 2012

Fine Particles in the Air

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

4.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas

PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE AQMD I-710 AIR MONITORING STUDY

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League PO Box 88 Glendale Springs, North Carolina

CCR COMPLIANCE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN. Prepared for: Tucson Electric Power Company Springerville Generating Station Springerville, Arizona

Chapter 14: Air Quality

1.6 lbs/car-mile x 365 days x 115 cars x12 miles x 2000 (pounds in a ton) = 400 tons a year of coal dust deposited in Oakland annually

4.12 AIR QUALITY INTRODUCTION

WASHINGTON COUNTY. Air Quality PM2.5

Questions Not Addressed at 2/15/18 Public Information Meeting About Lehigh Cement and Quarry

Sand Mining and Transport: Potential Health Effects. Thomas M. Peters, PhD, CIH Associate Professor University of Iowa Iowa City, IA

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

Comments on Draft Permit #12-POY-079. FTS International Proppants, LLC. Acadia, Trempealeau, Wisconsin. March 15, 2013

Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley

Residential Wood Combustion Workshop

Jennings O Donovan & Partners Consulting Engineers Sligo

April 2003 RTPA BACM Submittal

5. TAC EMISSIONS 5.1 INTRODUCTION HEALTH EFFECTS

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE PLAN APPLICATION

Emission Inventory EMISSIONS INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA. Presentation Outline 9/30/2015

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL

07/08 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1

Major Air Pollutants

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

Reducing Power Plant Emissions: EPA s New Proposed Rules For Mercury

State Implementation Plans for Federal 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards San Joaquin Valley Eastern Kern County

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DRAFT STAFF REPORT

5. TAC EMISSIONS 5.1 INTRODUCTION HEALTH EFFECTS

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Board of Directors Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Environmental Science 101 Air Resources. Fall Lecture Outline: Terms You Should Know: Learning Objectives: Reading Assignment:

CE 213A Introduction to Environmental Science

NELSON PLANT CCR FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Board of Directors Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Potential and Costs for Controlling Fine Particulate Emissions in Europe

Module 4.1 Pollution Prevention

General Plan. Air Quality Element. Adopted December 15, 1993 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended September 26, 2017

Vista Canyon Transit Center - Air Quality Technical Memorandum

Section 3.2 Air Quality ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN AIR POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN

Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Health Risks ( edited for AHS APES)

Marina Shores Village Project

Chapter 6 CO, PM 10, and Other Pollutant Air Quality Impacts and Mitigation For Project Operation

CHAPTER 11. Air Quality and the Transportation Plan

Guidance for Filling Out An Application for an Earth Moving Permit / Dust Control Plan. Section 1 Applicant Information

SECTION AIR POLLUTION AND HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTROLS

Courtyard and Towneplace Suites Hotel Project Air Quality Study

Oregon. 800 NE Oregon St. #640 Portland, OR (971)

Guidance for Filling Out An Application for an Earth Moving Permit / Dust Control Plan. Section 1 Applicant Information

Going One Step Beyond in North Denver

WORKING GROUP MEETING #6 PROPOSED AMENDED RULE 1407

CAP.GB.DUS.7/03. Use this booklet to help assure that your business is meeting air quality laws, and to train your employees.

BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 18: Reduction of Risk from Air Toxic Emissions at Existing Facilities

Air Quality. in San Diego Annual Report AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT C O U N T Y O F S A N D I E G O

Guidance for Filling Out An Application for an Earth Moving Permit / Dust Control Plan. Section 1 Applicant Information

Revisions to National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution. Webinar for States and Local Agencies December 19, 2012

Air and Water Quality

Annual CCR Fugitive Dust Control Report. Tucson Electric Power Company Springerville Generating Station Springerville, Arizona

Mohsen Nazemi, P.E. Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management District

Imperial County Air Quality. Felipe Solorzano. San Diego State University: Undergraduate. Project duration: March 2014-August 2014

ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM CEMENT PLANTS

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District November 20, Chapter 10

Final Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 )

1. Where natural gas, grade number 2 fuel oil, coke oven gas, or blast furnace gas is used:

Wildfire Mitigation Plan for the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area for PM 2.5. (Aerial view of the Tubbs and Pocket fires, 10/12/2017)

STORAGE, HANDLING, AND TRANSPORT OF COKE, COAL AND SULFUR

Final Updates to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone. October 2015

Environmental Management Measures Design for Reducing Vehicular Air Pollution in Dhaka City. Environmental Management

Hear perspective and receive input for plan from all affected stakeholders and subject matter experts Provide committee members with resources to

H. Dust Suppressant - water, hygroscopic materials, or non-toxic chemical stabilizers used

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF FINAL RULE. Department of Environmental Protection. Statement of Basis and Purpose

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU, ALASKA. Serial No

WESTAR-WRAP Regional Haze Webinar Series #5 November 16, 2017

WESTAR-WRAP Regional Haze Webinar Series #5 November 16, 2017

OUR NATION'S AIR STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2015 WELCOME!

CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering Prof. Tim Ellis

Transcription:

AGENDA ITEM 3 Particulate Matter Rules Update BAAQMD BACWA Meeting Guy Gimlen Rule Development Slide 1

PM Basics Particulate Matter is a diverse mix of airborne solid particles and liquid droplets that differ in size, mass, toxicity, chemical properties & how they behave in the atmosphere Total Suspended Solids (TSP): ~50 microns or less PM 10 : 10 microns or less* PM 2.5 : Fine PM 2.5 microns or less* Ultrafine PM: 0.1 microns or less* Smallest particles have the greatest health impacts! * One million microns = one meter Slide 2

PM Sources Wide range of emissions sources: natural and human-made Primary PM: emitted directly from tailpipes, stacks, windblown dust, etc. Both solids and small liquid droplets (called aerosols) Some pollutants emitted as a gas, then condense (called condensable PM) Secondary PM formed in the atmosphere: Precursor pollutants are ROG, NO x, SO x, NH 3 PM levels vary both geographically and with the weather Highest Bay Area PM 10 + PM 2.5 levels occur during fall from wild fires Highest Bay Area PM 2.5 levels occur during winter from wood burning Information on condensable particulates still improving Test method to quantify condensable particulates was finalized December 2010 Using this test method on sources with high potential for condensable PM refinery FCC s and cement kilns Waste water treating plants? Slide 3

PM Health Impacts Premature mortality Higher PM 2.5 levels higher death rates PM 2.5 accounts for 2,000-3,000 premature deaths each year in the Bay Area Respiratory problems asthma, bronchitis, impaired lung development Cardiovascular problems atherosclerosis, heart attacks, strokes Cancer diesel soot contains carcinogens Adverse health impacts even at moderate levels from both short-term & long-term exposure children & elderly are most at risk small particles penetrate deep into lungs, bloodstream, organs, and cells Slide 4

Estimated PM Health Burden in Bay Area Health Burden: Past and Present Then = 1970 s for ozone, 1980 s for toxics and PM Now = 2015 Health Impacts Source: Figure C-1, 2017 Plan Appendix C Air Pollution Health Burden: Past & Present Slide 5

High PM 2.5 Locations 2011-2016 PM 2.5 Daily Exceedances Vallejo 17 San Jose 15 Livermore 7 Oakland East 7 Oakland West 6 San Rafael 6 San Francisco 5 Redwood City 4 Concord 3 San Pablo 3 Gilroy 3 Napa 2 Total 80 Winter 73 Wildfires 7 Slide 6

Sources of PM 2.5 2017 Clean Air Plan Figure 2-6: Direct PM 2.5 Emissions by Source, Average, 2015 (47 tons/day) Slide 7

Number of Days Exceeding the Standard Air Quality Trends 24-hr PM 2.5 Exceedances each Winter 45 40 35 Number of Days Exceeding the National 24-hour Standard (35 ug/m3) 3-Year Running Average 30 25 20 Rule 6-3: Wood Smoke 15 10 5 0 Year Slide 8

Draft Structure for Regulation 6 Amendments to Regulation 6, Rule 1: General Requirements New Regulation 6, Rule 6: Prohibition of Trackout New Regulation 6, Rule 8: Bulk Material Handling Anticipate other source specific rules going forward Slide 9

Regulation 6, Rule 1: General Requirements Rule 6-1 is currently a Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) rule (includes PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) Proposed changes to Rule 6-1 Continue exemption for process heaters / boilers Combustion is a significant source, but no technology to prevent or control Limits apply to sources with significant TSP emissions (> 6 lbs. per day) Most waste water treating sources emit less than 6 lbs. per day Tighten general particulate matter emissions limits concentration and mass limits to match the most stringent requirements in California translation of TSP to PM 10 and/or PM 2.5 requirements is dependent on the specific solids Specify test methods for determining compliance Require periodic compliance testing Slide 10

Prohibition of Trackout New Regulation 6, Rule 6: Prohibition of Trackout Trackout = solids tracked out onto adjacent roads by vehicles Road dust from trackout has high PM 2.5 content Staff observed that more than 50% of construction sites had trackout issues. Currently required by many city / county ordinances, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans and California Motor Vehicle Code, but enforcement seems inadequate. Requirements No significant visible emissions No significant visible roadway material on adjacent paved roadway Immediate cleanup required (with no visible emissions) and no material at end of work day Regular monitoring Truck traffic in / out of waste water treating plants? Slide 11

Examples of Road Dust - Trackout From trucks Soil Erosion Slide 12

Examples of Trackout Controls Grizzlies Truck wash system Slide 13

Bulk Material Handling New Regulation 6, Rule 8: Bulk Material Handling Addresses fugitive dust from all bulk materials, including petroleum coke and coal. Best Available Control Technology: cover transportation vehicles, and enclosures around handling, loading, and unloading ducted to a baghouse. Requirements No Visible Emissions Wind screens and water-mist systems for existing facilities Load using telescoping chutes, limit drop height and freeboard to no more than 5 feet Again does waste water treating have much solids handling? Slide 14

Examples of Bulk Material Dust Quarry Petroleum Coke Slide 15

Bulk Material Dust Controls Wind Screens Mist Systems Slide 16

Workshops: Eight workshops in late January / early February Cupertino San Francisco San Rafael Yountville Walnut Creek Dublin San Jose Oakland Comments received by March 10 Public Hearing: Incorporate changes in Summer CEQA and Socio-economic analyses by Fall Public Hearing(s?) in Winter, 2017 Rule Making Schedule Slide 17

Next Steps for PM Follow through on Combustion Strategy in 2017 CAP to minimize combustion particulates / reduce fuel consumption Reduce refinery Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit PM 2.5 emissions Possible amendments to Rule 6-5 Address PM 2.5 emissions from cement kiln Evaluate PM risk as part of proposed Rule 11-18 Health Risk Assessment (HRA s) Future source specific, or risk-based rulemaking Slide 18

Questions? Guy Gimlen Principal Air Quality Engineer 415-749-4734 ggimlen@baaqmd.gov Slide 19

Reference Slides Slide 20

Air Quality Trends PM 2.5 Average (Design Value) 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * Slide 21

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM: 24-hour PM 10 standard = 150 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 54-61 µg/m 3 24-hour PM 2.5 standard = 35 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 36-49 µg/m 3 3-Year Average PM 2.5 standard = 12 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 10.4 µg/m 3 Meeting national requirements Need to submit Maintenance Plan to be redesignated as Attainment Currently no standards for ultrafine PM California Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM: PM Attainment Status 24-hour PM 10 standard = 50 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 54-61 µg/m 3 Average PM 10 standard = 20 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 22.3 µg/m 3 Average 3-Year Maximum PM 2.5 standard = 12 µg/m 3. Bay Area Peak = 12.8 µg/m 3 NOT meeting the state requirements - six year period from 2011 through 2016: exceeded State annual average PM 10 standard (20 µg/m 3 ) in 2011, 2013 and 2015 exceeded State 24 hour average PM 10 standard (50 µg/m 3 ) 18 times / locations exceeded State annual average PM 2.5 standard (12 µg/m 3 ) in two different locations in 2013 Exceedances almost always occur during winter Spare the Air season, or from wildfires Slide 22

Regulatory Control Programs Industrial Sources Regulations & permit conditions Control measures to reduce PM emissions in 2010 & draft 2017 Clean Air Plan Rule 6-5 addresses condensable PM from refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units Area Sources Rule 6-3 addresses wood-burning rule & Winter Spare The Air program Mobile Sources ARB regs reduce PM from shipping, heavy-duty & light-duty vehicles & equipment Mobile Source Compliance Plan: District enforces ARB regs in Bay Area Grants & Incentive programs to complement regulations Transportation & Mobile control measures in 2010 Clean Air Plan and draft 2017 Clean Air Plan Multi-pollutant control strategy in 2010 CAP and draft 2017 CAP is backbone of current program to reduce PM Slide 23

Current PM Regulations Regulation 2, Permits, Rule 2: New Source Review Regulation 5, Open Burning Regulation 6, Particulate Matter, Rule 1: General Requirements Regulation 6, Particulate Matter, Rule 2: Commercial Cooking Equipment Regulation 6, Particulate Matter, Rule 3: Wood Burning Devices Regulation 6, Particulate Matter, Rule 4: Metal Recycling and Shredding Operations Regulation 6, Particulate Matter, Rule 5: Particulate Emissions from Refinery Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Units Regulation 9, Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants, Rule 13: Nitrogen Oxides, Particulate Matter, and Toxic Air Contaminants from Portland Cement Manufacturing Regulation 10: Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources Regulation 12, Miscellaneous Standards of Performance, Rule 4: Sand Blasting Regulation 12, Rule 13: Foundry and Forging Operations Federal New Source Performance Standards (40 C.F.R. Part 60) Federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) (40 C.F.R. Part 63) Slide 24

Targeted Sources Source Categories PM 10 PM 2.5 Road Dust 6 subcategories 28.1 tpd 4.0 tpd Construction Dust 5 subcategories 11.5 1.1 Industrial Combustion 5.2 5.1 Petroleum Refinery Combustion 2.5 2.5 Industrial/Commercial Processes Petroleum Refinery Processing 0.3 0.2 Chemical Manufacturing 0.4 0.4 Food & Agricultural Processes 0.4 0.3 Wood Products 0.1 0.1 Asphalt 0.2 0.2 Concrete 1.1 0.8 Glass 0.7 0.7 Stone, Sand & Gravel 0.4 0.1 Landfills & Waste Management 1.9 0.5 Other 0.8 0.5 Slide 25

Control Methods Combustion Minute amounts of black carbon from incomplete combustion indicated by CO emissions Exempt from Rule 6-1 since there is no technical solution to this problem Industrial / Commercial Processes: Dust control required where solids and solids handling are exposed to wind Truck traffic is often the largest source of dust emissions When solids handling and processing are contained and vented through a stack Wet mechanical scrubbers and/or cyclones: 50 70% effective Baghouses, or Electrostatic precipitators: 90 + % effective Road Dust: Mud and other solids on roads are entrained into the air by traffic Slide 26

Control Methods Bulk Materials & Construction Dust: Wind Erosion Wind screens effective for stockpiles, conveyors, and disturbed surfaces Wind screens not effective at construction sites Water is frequently used to reduce dust Truck traffic is a significant source of dust on unpaved roads within facilities Water is used to reduce dust (water mist is more efficient than water spray) Trackout & Carryout Control Trackout = mud and dirt on vehicles deposited on roads leaving the facility Carryout = spills from the vehicles, or carried off the vehicle onto roads Slide 27

Asphalt New Regulation 6, Rule 7: Asphalt Operations Hot mix paving asphalt (particularly rubberized paving asphalt) smokes (known as blue smoke ) when delivered from a asphalt plant hopper into a delivery truck. This is very likely condensed asphalt, PM 2.5. Hot Chip Seal asphalt is sprayed as a liquid onto roads to repair cracks. This material creates significant blue smoke. Controlled by blue smoke abatement vacuum system & filter. Roofing Asphalt creates odors, and smoke from the Asphalt Kettle Controls are not cost effective Blue smoke abatement facilities collect very little material Low Fuming Roofing Asphalt available for only 1 supplier, and increases cost by 30% Affected Facilities ~ 2 Chip Seal Asphalt jobs - 0.02 tpd PM 10-0.02 tpd PM 2.5 ~100+ Roofing Asphalt jobs - 0.06 tpd PM 10-0.06 tpd PM 2.5 ~ 10 Paving Asphalt Plants? Slide 28