PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY A EXTENSION DRAINAGE REPORT

Similar documents
0.0. Pervious CN = 40. (Unconnected impervious) (Total impervious) Total impervious area (percent) Composite CN

ORDINANCE APPENDIX C RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND CURVE NUMBERS

Stormwater Analysis Report

Ponds Planning, Design, Construction

REFERENCE MAPS FEMA FIRM MAP NRCS SOILS MAP

THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STATEMENT FOR MULFORD ESTATES

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR THE BORGATA OUTDOOR EVENT AREA POOL ADDITION

Site Description. CCR Rule Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan (cont.) 2

Drainage Letter for Falcon High School Building Expansion

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

Watershed Delineation Techniques

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

City of Fort Collins. Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report

ORDINANCE APPENDIX F STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA

Stormwater Drainage Criteria Manual. City Of Clearwater Engineering Department Effective July 1, 2015

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Drainage Report. New Braunfels Municipal Airport. Master Plan Update 2005

Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

DRAFT. Technical Memorandum. Whitney Road Drainage & Safety Enhancements Phase III Hydraulic Update. Prepared For:

Soil Map Lewis County, Kentucky (Denham Farm, Sand Hill/Trinity, Lewis Co., KY) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Runoff Calculations. Time of Concentration (T c or t c ) from one location to another within a watershed. Travel

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

PEARCE CREEK CONFINED DISPOSAL AREA MODIFICATION

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

Design Example Residential Subdivision

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Background Watershed Description Hydrology - HEC-HMS Models Hydraulics - HEC-RAS Models...

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Mapping and Understanding YOUR LAKE S WATERSHED By: Tony Groves, Pam Tyning, and Tory Meyers Water Resources Group, Progressive AE

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS

LOWER SWEETWATER CREEK

Module 3 and Module 4 Watershed Analysis and RUSLE Calculation. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

Table of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

CE 585 Construction Site Erosion Control The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL. New Chevrolet and Cadillac Dealership Jasper, AL

Highway Surface Drainage

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

WinTR-55 Small Watershed Hydrology

4.1 Browns Canal Introduction Sub-basin Information

Alapaha Tract. Alapaha Tract. Berrien County GA Acres Par LL 320 LD 5. Date: 6/6/2017. TractName

GENERAL AND FLOODING STANDARDS SUBMISSION BRUNSWICK LAYOVER FACILITY BRUNSWICK, MAINE PREPARED FOR:

SWFWMD RAI No. 1 Comments 8a & 8b Response Appendix G Proposed Drainage Design Criteria

This page intentionally left blank

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

Pinheiro Ranch 55+/- Acres Orchard Development Ground Orland, CA. Presented By:

CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR: LOT 1 BLOCK 1 ROLLINS SUBDIVISION FILING #5. Prepared for:

SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE

APPENDIX E. Avila Ranch Drainage Report. Avila Ranch Development Project Draft EIR

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

Typical Local Erosion Control Requirements (Storm Water Management Authority, Inc.)

Water Resources Management Plan

City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek

Items in this checklist identify the base requirements that are to be provided by the design professional.

DRAINAGE REPORT. Project Name: PG&E Gas Operations Technical Training Center Winters, CA. Date: February 4, Prepared by: BKF Engineers

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

Extended Detention Basin Design

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District

AG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA Fax Paradox Seed Mother Orchard Red Bluff, CA

PART 3 - STANDARDS FOR SEWERAGE FACILITIES DESIGN OF STORM SEWERS

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

Technical Memorandum

Transcription:

PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A ETENSION DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for the Charlotte County Airport Authority Prepared By: 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, Florida 33607-1462 May 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Project Location...1 1.2 Project Description...1 1.3 Objective...1 2.0 EISTING CONDITIONS...2 2.1 Existing Land Uses...2 2.2 Soils...2 2.3 Floodplains...4 2.4 Existing Drainage...4 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS...6 3.1 Proposed Drainage...7 3.1.1 Stormwater Attenuation...8 3.1.2 Stormwater Treatment...9 4.0 ANALYSIS...9 4.1 Basin Drainage Areas...10 4.2 Curve Number...10 4.3 Time of Concentration...10 4.4 Rainfall...11 4.5 Rainfall Distribution...11 4.6 Shape Factor...11 4.7 Tailwater Conditions...12 4.8 ICPR Model Setup...13 4.9 Results...13 4.9.1 Peak Discharge Results...14 5.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION...15 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ON PAGE Table 1 Soils within the Contributing Drainage Area 3 Table 2 Existing Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area 4 Table 3 Proposed Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area 7 Table 4 Frequency, Duration and Rainfall used in the Existing and Proposed Analysis 11 Table 5 Shape Factors and Site Characteristics 12 Table 6 Peak Tailwater Elevations at the Boundary Nodes 13 Table 7 Summary of Existing and Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates 14 LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWS Figure 1 Location Map Page 1 Figure 2 Quad Map Figure 1 Figure 3 Property Map Figure 2 Figure 4 Existing Condition Drainage Map Page 4 Figure 5 Proposed Condition Drainage Map Page 7 Figure 6 Vegetated Upland Buffer Page 9 Figure B-1 Existing Condition Basin-Link-Node ICPR Connectivity Appendix B Figure C-1 Proposed Condition Basin-Link-Node ICPR Connectivity Appendix C LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Curve Number and Time of Concentration Calculations Existing Condition ICPR Input and Output Proposed Condition ICPR Input and Output Water Quality Calculations Rainfall Data Floodplain Map Tailwater Data ii

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Location The Punta Gorda Airport (Airport) encompasses approximately 1,844-acres, is owned and maintained by the Charlotte County Airport Authority and is located at 28000 Airport Road just east of I-75 approximately three miles east of the City of Punta Gorda, Florida. (See Location Map, Figure 1 and Quad Map, Figure 2). The proposed project is within the property boundary of the Airport and is identified as Construct Taxiway A Extension. The project site encompasses approximately 17.1-acres within Sections 10, 11, 14 and 15 Township 41S, Range23E of Charlotte County in an existing airfield infield area surrounded by Taxiway C, Runway 4-22, and Runway 15-33. 1.2 Project Description The proposed project consists of the construction of approximately 3.34-acres of new taxiway impervious pavement. The proposed stormwater management system consists of a 90-foot wide Vegetated Upland Buffer (VUBs) extending along the entire length of the proposed taxiway on the east and west sides. Stormwater runoff sheet flowing off the VUBs is collected in proposed ditches which are connected to the existing storm sewer system. The proposed Taxiway A pavement and associated grading completely fills an existing freshwater marsh wetland that encompasses approximately 0.35-acres, fills approximately 0.35-acres of and existing ditch and dredges approximately 1.10-acres of the same ditch. The Airport property boundaries, project limits and proposed development are shown on the Property Map, Figure 3. 1.3 Objective The Charlotte County Airport Authority has requested the services of the URS Corporation, Inc. to design, prepare construction plans and prepare a Joint Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application to the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) for the construction of Taxiway A. The purpose of this report is to discuss the proposed drainage systems associated with the proposed development. The drainage report will describe the existing and proposed conditions within a 338.08-acre drainage area associated with the Taxiway A Project Area. 1

North NTS TAIWAY "A" ETENSION PROJECT AREA (17.1-ACRES)

F RO A A RS A F RO A RS FA RO A A RS RS A F RO FA RO 3 A RO FA RS FA RO A RS RS A A RS A FA FA RO RS A A RS RO F A FA RS RO A FA RO A RS FA RO RO RS FA RO A F RO A RS RS A A RS RS A FA RO FA RO FA RO A RS RO F RS A A RS A C FA RO RS A RO FA RO A RS FA FA RO RO A A RS RS A RO FA FA RO A RS FA RO A RS A A F RO RO FA URS Corporation 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, FL 33607-1462 Tel: 813.286.1711 RS A RO FA RS A RO F A RS RS FA 2 B A RS A RO FA RS A RO FA 3 1 D 2 1 4 5 4 D C B A PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT 28000 A-1 Airport Road Punta Gorda, FL 33982 CONSTRUCT TAIWAY "A" ETENSION PROPERTY MAP 5 3

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A The drainage report will also describe the proposed improvements within the project area, and the analysis to design a VUB on the east and west sides of the Taxiway A to treat stormwater runoff as recommended in the Statewide Airport Stormwater Best Management Practice Manual dated April 27, 2013. The means and methods used to analyze the existing and proposed drainage conditions to demonstrate stormwater attenuation criteria are satisfied is also discussed, which consist of the NRCS method and the utilization of the Interconnected Pond Routing (ICPR) Version 3.10 computer program. 2.0 EISTING CONDITIONS The existing land uses, soils, floodplains, and existing drainage conditions within the 338.08-acre contributing drainage area, and the 17.1-acre Taxiway A project area, are discussed in the following sections. 2.1 Existing Land Uses The existing land uses within the 17.1-acre Taxiway A Project Area consist of upland and wetland communities as defined by the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). The upland community within the Taxiway A project area is Airports (811), which is comprised primarily of open grassed area and some existing pavement associated with Taxiway A occupies approximately 15.30-acres of the project area. The two wetland communities found within the Taxiway A Project Area are Freshwater Marsh (641) and Streams and Waterways (510), which occupy approximately 0.35-ares and 1.45-acres, respectively within the project area. The upland and wetland community types for both project areas are described in more detail in the attached environmental report. 2.2 Soils The soils within the contributing drainage area were determined from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) Soil Survey of Charlotte County, Florida (Soil Survey). The soil types and their delineations obtained from the Soil Survey showing the soils within the contributing drainage area and nearby vicinity are shown in Appendix A Curve Number and Time of Concentration Calculations. The soil types within the contributing drainage basin consist of five non-hydric upland soils and four hydric soils. The soil types within the contributing drainage basin and their respective 2

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A hydric/non-hydric classification, and Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) are shown on Table 1 - Soils within the Contributing Drainage Area. Table1 Soils within the Contributing Drainage Area Hydrologic Map Hydric/Non- Soil Name Soil Symbol Hydric Group 11 Pompano fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes A/D Non-Hydric 13 Boca fine sand fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes A/D Non-Hydric 14 Valkaria fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes A/D Hydric 27 Pompano fine sand, depressional A/D Hydric 28 Immokalee sand, 0 to 2 % slopes B/D Non-Hydric 33 Oldsmar sand, 0 to 2 % slopes A/D Non-Hydric 44 Malabar fine sand, depressional, 0 to 1 % slopes A/D Hydric 53 Myakka fine sand, depressional A/D Hydric 63 Malabar fine sand, high, 0 to 2 % slopes A/D Non-Hydric The Soil Survey indicates the drainage conditions of the nine soils in the contributing drainage basin are poorly drained or very poorly drained as indicated below: (11) Pompano fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained, (13) Boca fine sand fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained, (14) Valkaria fine sand, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained (27) Pompano fine sand, depressional: very poorly drained (28) Immokalee sand, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained (33) Oldsmar sand, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained (44) Malabar fine sand, depressional, 0 to 1 % slopes: very poorly drained (53) Myakka fine sand, depressional: very poorly drained (63) Malabar fine sand, high, 0 to 2 % slopes: poorly drained 3

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A 2.3 Floodplains The following Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) within unincorporated and incorporated areas of Charlotte County, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA was reviewed to determine the location of floodplains within the Taxiway A project area. A copy of the portion of the FRIM showing the project area is located in Appendix F Floodplain Map. Community - Panel Number 12015C0261F Charlotte County, Florida May 5, 2003 The FIRM identified above indicates the Taxiway A Project Area is within the Zone flood zone. Zone is defined by FEMA as areas of outside of the 500-year floodplain. Therefore, no floodplains are impacted by this project. 2.4 Existing Drainage The contributing drainage area associated with the Taxiway A Project Area encompasses approximately 338.08 acres and was sub-divided into eleven (11) drainage basins as shown on Figure 4 Existing Condition Drainage Map. The 11 drainage basins are listed in Table 2 Existing Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area along with their respective drainage area, curve number and time of concentration. Table 2 Existing Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area Pervious Impervious Water or Drainage Total Open Time of Pavement Wetlands Curve Basin Area Space Concentration Area Area Number Name (acres) Area (minutes) (acres) (acres) (acres) 5 124.04 1.86 112.54 9.64 76.23 225.99 5C 27.39 4.90 20.52 1.97 82.47 109.81 6 29.07 29.07 73.85 135.85 7 24.98 23.96 1.02 75.44 108.68 8 46.04 46.04 73.82 152.91 9 17.86 15.04 2.82 79.11 84.51 16 23.42 3.44 19.35 0.63 83.18 80.14 16A 15.45 2.98 12.17 0.30 83.66 60.03 4

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A Table 2 Existing Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area Pervious Impervious Water or Drainage Total Open Time of Pavement Wetlands Curve Basin Area Space Concentration Area Area Number Name (acres) Area (minutes) (acres) (acres) (acres) 16B 3.15 0.71 2.22 0.22 85.45 20.75 16C 17.00 4.01 11.89 1.10 85.54 50.25 WETLAND 1 9.68 9.42 0.26 80.54 53.45 TOTAL 338.08 17.90 302.22 17.96 The contributing drainage area is within the southeast portion of the Airport comprised of undeveloped areas east of Runway 4-22 and the aforementioned grassed airfield infield area surrounded by Taxiway C, Runway 4-22, and Runway 15-33. The existing impervious area which encompasses approximately 17.90-acres consists exclusively of paved pavement associated with existing runways and taxiways. No buildings, parking lots, roadways or aprons are within the contributing drainage area. The pervious open spaces within the airfield infield area consist of grass areas that are regularly mowed. The wetlands within the airfield infield area consist of drainage ditches occupying approximately 0.50-acres and a small 0.35-acre freshwater marsh wetland. The pervious areas in the undeveloped areas east of Runway 4-22 consist of scrub brush land with isolated wetlands scattered throughout and two long linear ditches parallel to Runway 4-22. There are six drainage basins in the undeveloped area east of Runway 4-22 identified as 5, 5C, 6, 7, 8, and 9 that collectively encompass approximately 269.38-acres. Stormwter runoff within the drainage basins identified as 6, 7, 8 and 9 sheet flow into isolated marsh wetlands. During typical rain events the water is retained within these wetlands, however, during heavy infrequent storm events the water overtops into Drainage Basin 5. Drainage Basin 5 contains a long linear ditch parallel to Runway 4-22 that conveys water southward for approximately 3,600-feet where it turns westward towards Runway 4-22. The ditch conveys water westward for approximately 330-feet up to the downstream end of another ditch parallel to Runway 4-22. This other ditch is within Drainage Basin 5C and conveys stormwater runoff southward for approximately 2,800- feet where it joins the downstream end of the ditch in Drainage Basin 5. The confluence of the downstream ends of these two ditches in Drainage Basins 5 and 5C are at the upstream end of an 5

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A existing double barrel 18-inch RCP that conveys water westward under Runway 4-22. This 18- inch RCP discharges into an existing ditch within the airfield infield area. There are five drainage basins in the airfield infield area identified as 16, 16A, 16B, 16C and WETLAND 1 that collectively encompass approximately 68.7-acres. The drainage system in the airfield infield area consists of two ditches. The first ditch is parallel to the west side of Runway 4-22 and flows southward for approximately 1,900-feet from Taxiway C to Runway 15-33. The first ditch consists of two segments interconnected with an 18-inch cmp. However, this 18-inch cmp is plugged with sediment and is ineffective. Therefore, the upstream end of the ditch fills with water due to the plugged pipe and overtops the culvert into the downstream end of the ditch. The 0.35-acre marsh wetland is connected to the first ditch immediately downstream of the plugged 18-inch cmp. The downstream end of the first joins the upstream end of the second ditch. The aforementioned double barrel 18-inch RCP that conveys water from the undeveloped area of the contributing drainage area under Runway 4-22 discharges into the confluence of these two ditches. The second ditch conveys water in a northwest direction parallel to the east side of Runway 15-33 up to an existing triple barrel 24-inch RCP culvert that conveys water under Taxiway C into an existing ditch outside of the drainage area analyzed for this project. This ditch outside of the project area continues to convey water in a northwest direction parallel to the east side of Runway 15-33 up to a series of pipes and ditches that convey the water northward off Airport property to an existing drainage canal on the south side of Henry Street. 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed project includes extending the existing Taxiway A approximately 2,100-feet from Taxiway C to Runway 15-33. The extension of Taxiway A provides a parallel taxiway on the west side of Runway 4-22 for its entire length. The construction of Taxiway A adds approximately 3.34-acres of impervious pavement onto an existing grassed infield area surrounded by existing taxiways and runways. The proposed drainage system as described in the next section is designed to accommodate the conveyance, treatment and attenuation of stormwater runoff for the contributing drainage basin with the 3.34-acres of new impervious pavement constructed. 6

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A 3.1 Proposed Drainage The 338.08-acre contributing drainage basin associated with the Taxiway A Project Area changes as a result of constructing Taxiway A. The 338.08-acre drainage basin is described in this section after the construction the new 3.34-acres of impervious taxiway pavement and the proposed stormwater management system. The number of drainage basins within the 338.08- acre contributing drainage area remains at 11, however, the WETLAND 1 basin was removed because the existing 0.35-acre marsh wetland is completely filled and Drainage Basin 16A was spilt into two drainage basins identified as 16A and 16D. The proposed drainage basins and proposed drainage system are shown on Figure 5-Proposed Condition Drainage Map. The 11 drainage basins within the proposed condition contributing drainage area are listed in Table 3 Proposed Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area along with their respective drainage area, curve number and time of concentration. Table 3 Proposed Condition Drainage Basins within the Contributing Drainage Area Pervious Impervious Water or Drainage Total Open Time of Pavement Wetlands Curve Basin Area Space Concentration Area Area Number Name (acres) Area (minutes) (acres) (acres) (acres) 5 124.04 1.86 112.54 9.64 76.23 225.99 5C 27.39 4.90 20.52 1.97 82.47 109.81 6 29.07 29.07 73.85 135.85 7 24.98 23.96 1.02 75.44 108.68 8 46.04 46.04 73.82 152.91 9 17.86 15.04 2.82 79.11 84.51 16 22.36 3.11 18.62 0.63 83.07 80.14 16A 11.31 3.48 7.53 0.30 86.07 43.48 16B 10.58 3.63 6.74 0.21 86.57 35.77 16C 16.64 2.70 12.88 1.06 84.19 56.58 16D 7.81 1.56 5.99 0.26 84.26 49.93 TOTAL 338.08 21.24 298.93 17.91 7

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A The drainage area in the undeveloped area east of Runway 4-22 comprised of the six drainage basins identified as 5, 5C, 6, 7, 8, and 9 that collectively encompass approximately 269.38-acres did not change because construction is not proposed within these six basins. Therefore, the drainage conditions are the same as those described for the existing condition is Section 2.4 of this report. The construction of the Taxiway A extension changed the drainage condition within the airfield infield area because it adds approximately 3.34-acres of new impervious surfaces, results in the filling and completely eliminating the 0.35-acre freshwater marsh wetland, re-grading the existing ditch parallel to the west side of Runway 4-22 and the east side of the proposed Taxiway A extension and constructing a new ditch parallel to the proposed Taxiway A extension on the west side. The existing plugged 18-inch cmp joining the two segments of the existing ditch on the west side of Runway 4-22 and the east side of the proposed Taxiway A extension was removed. The area where the pipe was removed became a high spot where the re-graded ditch splits flow to the north and south. The portion of the ditch flowing north is within the drainage basin identified as 16A. This ditch flows north for approximately 1,000-feet and joins the upstream end of a proposed double barrel 14 x 23 ERCP at the proposed mitered end section S-3. This double barrel 14 x 23 ERCP conveys the water westward under the north end of the proposed Taxiway A extension into the upstream end of a proposed ditch on the west side of Taxiway A. This ditch flows southward parallel to Taxiway A for approximately 1,540-feet where it joins the existing ditch flowing northward parallel to Runway 15-33. The south end of the proposed ditch on the east side of Taxiway A flows southward for approximately 770-feet and joins the upstream end of a proposed double barrel 14 x 23 ERCP at the proposed headwall structure S-1. This double barrel 14 x 23 ERCP conveys the water westward under the south end of the proposed Taxiway A extension into the upstream end of the existing ditch flowing northward parallel to Runway 15-33. 3.1.1 Stormwater Attenuation The two proposed ditches on the east and west sides of Taxiway A coupled with the two double barrel 14 x 23 ERCPs at the north and south ends of these two ditches attenuates stormwater. Therefore, the proposed drainage system parallel to Taxiway A is designed such that peak proposed condition discharge rates for the 2.33-year, 24-hour and 25-year, 24-hour storm events 8

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A exiting the project area are less than existing condition discharge rates. This is demonstrated with the existing and proposed conditions ICPR models discussed in Section 4.0 of this report. 3.1.2 Stormwater Treatment The proposed stormwater treatment system associated with the new pavement for Taxiway A is comprised of overland flow, as described in Section 605 (a) of the Statewide Airport Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, ( Airside BMP Manual ) Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Office dated April 27, 2013. Taxiway A is crowned at the centerline, therefore, stormwater runoff flowing off Taxiway A is deposited onto a 90-foot wide Vegetated Upland Buffer (VUB) stabilized with grass turf on the east and west sides of Taxiway A. This 90-foot VUB extends the entire length of the Taxiway A extension as shown on Figure 6 Vegetated Upland Buffer. The proposed 90-foot wide VUB is comprised of a 20-foot wide shoulder at a 5% grade starting at the proposed edge of pavement for Taxiway A and a70-foot wide safety area at a 3% grade up to the top of bank of the parallel ditch along the west side of Taxiway A and the toe of slope of the parallel ditch along the east side of Taxiway A. A spread sheet calculation provided by the SWFWMD that utilizes the overland flow formula for VUBs was used to design the VUB for this project. The formula is used to determine the minimum width of the VUB based on the rainfall depth for the 2.33-year, 24-hour storm at 4.5- inches, a travel time across the VUB of 200 seconds, a manning roughness coefficient of 0.15 for short grass and an average slope across the VUB of 3.44%. The 200 second travel time is based on the default time contained in the spread sheet provided by the SWFWMD recommended for discharges entering Class III waters. The 3.44% slope is a weighted average of the 20-foot wide shoulder at 5% and the 70-foot wide safety area at 3%. The results of the calculations indicate the minimum width of the VUB shall be 85.43-feet based on the input parameters indicated above. Therefore, a 90-foot wide VUB is specified on both sides of Taxiway A, which exceeds the minimum width of 25-feet recommended in the Airside BMP Manual. The calculations for the VUB are located in Appendix D Water Quality Calculations. 4.0 ANALYSIS The existing and proposed hydrologic conditions for the 338.08-acre contributing drainage area were evaluated by the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) method as outlined in Technical Release 55 (TR55), Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. The NRCS method involves the development of a hydrologic computer model on measurable watershed 9

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A characteristics. Watershed characteristics include soil type, moisture conditions, and land use. These characteristics are used to determine the input parameters of the model. Input parameters include rainfall amount, rainfall distribution, basin drainage areas, curve numbers and times of concentration. Hydrodynamic computer models were developed for the existing and proposed conditions using the Interconnected Pond Routing (ICPR) version 3.10 computer program to develop hydrographs. The methods and sources used to determine the following input parameters for the NRCS method and the ICPR model are as follows: 4.1 Basin Drainage Areas The basin boundaries for the existing condition were delineated based on a topographic survey of the project area and contours from an aerial survey of the entire Airport property (see Figure 4). The basin boundaries altered by the proposed project were determined from the proposed design grades shown in the construction plans (see Figure 5). 4.2 Curve Number The major factors that determine curve number are the hydrologic soil group, land use and antecedent runoff condition. Soil groups and their respective hydrologic soil groups were determined from information in the Soil Survey. Land use was determined from aerial photographs, the most recent base map for the Airport and the proposed project site layout. Curve numbers for each basin were determined from tables in the TR-55 manual based on the hydrologic soil conditions for each soil type, land use, and an antecedent moisture condition of II. The existing condition and proposed condition curve number calculations are shown in Appendix A. 4.3 Time of Concentration The time of concentration is defined as the time for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant point of the basin to a point of interest (node point) within the basin. The time of concentration for each basin was the sum of one or more of the following types of flow regimes; sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow. The type that occurs was determined from aerial photography supplemented with contours from field survey and the proposed grading plan. Characteristics that influence time of concentration are surface roughness, channel shape, and slope. Sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow were determined by the methods outlined in the 10

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A TR-55 manual. The existing condition and proposed condition time of concentration calculations are shown in Appendix A. 4.4 Rainfall The rainfall amounts for the 2.33-year, 24-hour (man annual) and 25-year, 24-hour storm events are shown in Table 4-Frequency, Duration and Rainfall used in the Existing and Proposed Analysis. The rainfall amounts are from rainfall depth maps located in the SWFWMD permit manual, which are located in Appendix E-Rainfall Data. Table 4 Frequency, Duration and Rainfall Used in the Existing and Proposed Analysis Frequency (Year) Duration (Hour) Rainfall (in) 2 24 4.50 25 24 8.00 4.5 Rainfall Distribution The intensity of rainfall varies considerably during a storm. Therefore, a synthetic (Type II Florida Modified) rainfall time distribution is used in the computer models. This distribution includes maximum rainfall intensities for the selected design frequency arranged in a sequence that is critical for producing peak runoff. 4.6 Shape Factor The shape factor accounts for the effect of watershed storage. Table 5-Shape Factors and Site Characteristics show the relationship between some commonly used shape factors and basin characteristics that affect storage. The shape factor is inversely proportional to the amount of storage potential in a basin. High shape factors indicate low storage potential and visa versa. Therefore, a shape factor of 256 is utilized because of the mild slopes and the potential for runoff to be trapped and isolated in pockets that occur within the contributing drainage basins. 11

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A Table 5 Shape Factors and Site Characteristics Peak Rate Factor Range Site Storage characteristics 256 to 284 Significant surface storage, mild slopes 323 to 384 Moderate surface storage, mild slopes, lack of drainage features 484 Little or no storage, moderate to steep slopes 4.7 Tailwater Conditions Stormwater runoff from the contributing drainage area outfalls through the existing triple barrel 24-inch RCP under Taxiway C into the ditch parallel to Runway 15-33 identified as the time/stage boundary node 14-1. Stormwater could also potentially outfall from the contributing drainage area into the infield area west of Runway 15-23 at the time/stage boundary node 17-1 and the existing ditch in the undeveloped portion of the study area at the time/stage boundary node 5B-1. However, the 17-1 and 5B-1 time/stage/ boundary nodes only receive discharge during heavy infrequent storm events. The results of the model indicate the Nodes 17-1 and 5B- 1 received no discharge from the contributing drainage area during the 2.33-year, 24-hour and 25-year, 24-hour model simulations. Nodes 17-1 and 5B-1 were included in the existing condition and proposed condition models for this project because the Airport wide ICPR model included in the Airport Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) shows the drainage nodes 16-1 and 5-2 within the project area drainage area hydraulically connected to the drainage nodes 17-1 and 5B- 1, respectively, with overtopping weirs. The peak water stages and the time these peak water stages occur were obtained from the ICPR model results from the Airport wide ICPR model included in the Airport SWMP (see Appendix G Tailwater Data). The Airport wide ICPR model did not analyze the 2.33-year, 24-hour storm event. Therefore, 25-year, 24-hour peak stages from the Airport wide ICPR are used in the time/stage rating curves for the three boundary nodes in the existing condition and proposed condition ICPR models for the 2.33-year, 24-hour storm event and 25-year, 24-hour storm simulations for this project. The peak water elevations and their respective time to peak for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event for the three boundary nodes are summarized in Table 6 Peak Tailwater Elevations at the Boundary Nodes. The elevation data in the Airport Wide ICPR model are based on the 1929 NGVD vertical datum, whereas the elevations in the existing and proposed conditions ICPR models for this project are based on the 1988 NAVD datum. Therefore, the peak water stages for the three boundary nodes obtained from the Airport wide ICPR model were reduced by the conversion factor of 1.14-feet. 12

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A Table 6 Peak Tailwater Elevations at the Boundary Nodes Time/Stage Peak Water Surface Elevation 25-yr, 24-hr Storm Event Time to Peak Boundary Node 1929 NGVD Datum (ft) 1988 NAVD Datum (ft) (hr) 14-1 19.86 18.72 17.86 17-1 21.02 19.88 15.06 5B-1 22.25 21.11 15.00 4.8 ICPR Model Setup The aforementioned parameters are used in the exiting condition and proposed condition hydrodynamic computer models, ICPR version 3.10, to determine excess rainfall (runoff). The program computes composite runoff hydrographs for the basins in the existing and proposed condition. The ICPR program routs the basins, to nodes to determine flows and stages. This concept requires that the drainage system be broken down into a network of nodes and reaches. A node is a discrete location in the drainage system where conservation of mass or continuity is maintained. Links are the connections between nodes and are used to transfer or convey water through the drainage system. Reaches consist of pipes and weirs. Nodes and links are established from information from the field survey, Airport wide ICPR model, proposed contours and the proposed drainage design. Nodes consist of wetlands, ditches and low spots where water collects. The existing condition hydrologic/hydraulic ICPR model is a simulated model of the contributing drainage area prior to the construction of the proposed project. The proposed condition hydrologic/hydraulic ICPR model simulates the contributing drainage area after the construction of the proposed project and proposed drainage system. The ICPR input and output for the existing and proposed conditions are located in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively. 4.9 Results The results of the analysis demonstrate that the proposed project meets all water quantity and water quality requirements mandated by the SWFWMD. The water quality requirements are 13

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A satisfied with the construction of the VUB as described in Section 3.1.2 of this report. water quantity results are discussed in the following section. The 4.9.1 Peak Discharge Results The SWFWMD requires the runoff leaving the site shall not cause adverse off-site impacts for the 2.33-year, 24-hour and the 25-year, 24-hour storm events. The project site discharges storm water runoff into the boundary node identified as Node 14-1 during the 2.33-year, 24-hour and the 25-year, 24-hour storm events through the existing triple barrel 24-inch RCP under Taxiway C. Node 14-1 represents the downstream end of the existing ditch parallel to Runway 15-33. This ditch conveys water northward to drainage systems that conveys water to the off-site canal on the south side of Henry Street. Therefore, to ensure off-site drainage systems are not adversely impacted, the design of the proposed stormwater management is such that the peak proposed condition discharge rates are less than the peak existing condition discharge rates for the 2.33-year, 24-hour and the 25-year, 24-hour storm events into the 14-1 boundary node. Attenuation is provided in the two proposed ditches on the east and west sides of Taxiway A. Most of the attenuation occurs within the proposed ditch on the east side of Taxiway A because of the two proposed double barrel 14 x 23 ERCPs at the north and south ends because they serve as a choke point and slow down the rate of flow contributed from the large undeveloped area to the east. Results of the existing condition and proposed condition ICPR models indicate this requirement is satisfied as shown in Table 7- Summary of Existing and Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates. Table 7 Summary of Existing and Proposed Conditions Peak Discharge Rates Peak Discharge Rates into Boundary Nodes 14-1 and 13-H Boundary Node Existing Condition Proposed Condition (cfs) (cfs) Mean Annual 25-yr, 24-hr Mean Annual 25-yr, 24-hr 14-1 30.72 47.79 29.99 45.88 17-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5B-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 30.72 47.79 29.99 45.88 14

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A 5.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The maintenance and operation function of the proposed VUB, ditches and pipes is the responsibility of the Charlotte County Airport Authority. The stormwater management systems should be inspected on a monthly basis and after each storm event for the following critical items: Accumulation of sediment and other debris blocking flows in the pipes, Erosion within the ditches, around end treatments for the proposed pipes and the VUB,. Excessive growth of nuisance vegetation within the ditches. The ditches and VUB should be mowed on a regular basis to prevent excessive growth of vegetation. The proposed pipes, and their end treatments (i.e. mitered end sections and headwalls) should also be inspected and cleaned periodically. 15

APPENDI A CURVE NUMBER AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS

EISTING CONDITION CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS

Project: Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Sheet 1 of 1 Subject: Existing Condition Curve Number Calculations Computed By: RWP Date: 03-05-15 Project No.: 60405806 Checked By: Date: Existing Condition Curve Number Calculations CN=((AC)i(CN)i+(AC)i+1(CN)i+1+(AC)i+2(CN)i+2 +.(AC)n-1(CN)n-1+(AC)n(CN)n))/Total Area Basin Total Impervious Area Pervious Area Composite Name Area Land Use Pavement and Soil Land Use Roofs Hydrologic Open Space Brush Meaddow Wetland (AC) (AC) CN Group (AC) CN (AC) CN (AC) CN (AC) CN CN 5 124.04 1.86 98 D 13.41 80 99.13 73 9.64 100 76.23 5C 27.39 4.9 98 D 11.96 80 8.56 73 1.97 100 82.47 6 29.07 D 2.01 80 24.91 73 2.15 78 73.85 7 24.98 D 17.3 73 6.66 78 1.02 100 75.44 8 46.04 D 38.47 73 7.57 78 73.82 9 17.86 D 4.72 80 10.32 73 2.82 100 79.11 16 23.42 3.44 98 D 19.35 80 0.63 100 83.18 16A 15.45 2.98 98 D 12.17 80 0.3 100 83.86 16B 3.15 0.71 98 D 2.22 80 0.22 100 85.45 16C 17.00 4.01 98 D 11.89 80 1.1 100 85.54 WETLAND 1 9.68 D 9.42 80 0.26 100 80.54 Total 338.08 17.90 87.15 198.69 16.38 17.96

PROPOSED CONDITION CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS

Project: Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Sheet 1 of 2 Subject: Proposed Condition Curve Number Calculations Computed By: RWP Date: 03-05-15 Project No.: 60405806 Checked By: Date: Proposed Condition Curve Number Calculations CN=((AC)i(CN)i+(AC)i+1(CN)i+1+(AC)i+2(CN)i+2 +.(AC)n-1(CN)n-1+(AC)n(CN)n))/Total Area Basin Total Impervious Area Pervious Area Composite Name Area Land Use Pavement and Soil Land Use Roofs Hydrologic Open Space Brush Meaddow Wetland (AC) (AC) CN Group (AC) CN (AC) CN (AC) CN (AC) CN CN 5 124.04 1.86 98 D 13.41 80 99.13 73 9.64 100 76.23 5C 27.39 4.9 98 D 11.96 80 8.56 73 1.97 100 82.47 6 29.07 D 2.01 80 24.91 73 2.15 78 73.85 7 24.98 D 17.3 73 6.66 78 1.02 100 75.44 8 46.04 D 38.47 73 7.57 78 73.82 9 17.86 D 4.72 80 10.32 73 2.82 100 79.11 16 22.36 3.11 98 D 18.62 80 0.63 100 83.07 16A 11.31 3.48 98 D 7.53 80 0.30 100 86.07 16B 10.58 3.63 98 D 6.74 80 0.21 100 86.57 16C 16.64 2.7 98 D 12.88 80 1.06 100 84.19 16D 7.81 1.56 98 D 5.99 80 0.26 100 84.26 Total 338.08 21.24 83.86 198.69 16.38 17.91

BACKUP DATA FOR CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS

82 0' 44'' W Hydrologic Soil Group Charlotte County, Florida 81 57' 49'' W 26 55' 39'' N 26 53' 58'' N 2976200 2976700 2977200 2977700 2978200 2978700 399600 400100 400600 401100 401600 402100 402600 403100 403600 404100 399600 400100 400600 401100 401600 402100 402600 403100 403600 404100 2975700 2976200 2976700 2977200 2977700 2978200 2978700 26 55' 39'' N 26 53' 58'' N 82 0' 44'' W N Map Scale: 1:22,100 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters 0 300 600 1200 1800 Feet 0 1000 2000 4000 6000 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 81 57' 49'' W Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Page 1 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group Charlotte County, Florida MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Charlotte County, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 9, 2014 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 18, 2011 Feb 10, 2010 Mar The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Page 2 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group Charlotte County, Florida Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group Summary by Map Unit Charlotte County, Florida (FL015) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 10 Pompano fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 11 Myakka fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 12 Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13 Boca fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 14 Valkaria fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 26 Pineda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 27 Pompano fine sand, depressional 28 Immokalee sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 33 Oldsmar sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 34 Malabar fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 35 Wabasso sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 40 Anclote sand, depressional 42 Wabasso sand, limestone substratum 43 Smyrna fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 44 Malabar fine sand, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 49 Felda fine sand, depressional 53 Myakka fine sand, depressional 63 Malabar fine sand, high, 0 to 2 percent slopes 69 Matlacha gravelly fine sand 73 Pineda fine sand, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes A/D 73.0 3.7% A/D 23.5 1.2% A/D 12.3 0.6% A/D 109.7 5.5% A/D 479.8 24.0% A/D 225.8 11.3% A/D 28.8 1.4% B/D 721.8 36.1% A/D 159.9 8.0% A/D 55.1 2.8% C/D 22.6 1.1% A/D 0.1 0.0% C/D 19.6 1.0% A/D 3.2 0.2% A/D 3.3 0.2% A/D 0.0 0.0% A/D 29.2 1.5% A/D 10.3 0.5% B 2.9 0.1% A/D 1.9 0.1% Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Page 3 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group Charlotte County, Florida Hydrologic Soil Group Summary by Map Unit Charlotte County, Florida (FL015) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 99 Water 16.0 0.8% Totals for Area of Interest 1,998.7 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Page 4 of 4

Chapter 2 Estimating Runoff Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2a Runoff curve numbers for urban areas 1/ Curve numbers for ------------------------------------------- Cover description ----------------------------------------- -----------hydrologic soil group ------------- Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious area 2/ A B C D Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established) Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.) 3/ : Poor condition (grass cover < 50%)... 68 79 86 89 Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%)... 49 69 79 84 Good condition (grass cover > 75%)... 39 61 74 80 Impervious areas: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way)... 98 98 98 98 Streets and roads: Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right-of-way)... 98 98 98 98 Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way)... 83 89 92 93 Gravel (including right-of-way)... 76 85 89 91 Dirt (including right-of-way)... 72 82 87 89 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) 4/... 63 77 85 88 Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders)... 96 96 96 96 Urban districts: Commercial and business... 85 89 92 94 95 Industrial... 72 81 88 91 93 Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less (town houses)... 65 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre... 38 61 75 83 87 1/3 acre... 30 57 72 81 86 1/2 acre... 25 54 70 80 85 1 acre... 20 51 68 79 84 2 acres... 12 46 65 77 82 Developing urban areas Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) 5/... 77 86 91 94 Idle lands (CN s are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2c). 1 Average runoff condition, and I a = 0.2S. 2 The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN s. Other assumptions are as follows: impervious areas are directly connected to the drainage system, impervious areas have a CN of 98, and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in good hydrologic condition. CN s for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4. 3 CN s shown are equivalent to those of pasture. Composite CN s may be computed for other combinations of open space cover type. 4 Composite CN s for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage (CN = 98) and the pervious area CN. The pervious area CN s are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition. 5 Composite CN s to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and construction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4 based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the CN s for the newly graded pervious areas. (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 2 5

Chapter 2 Estimating Runoff Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2c Runoff curve numbers for other agricultural lands 1/ Curve numbers for --------------------------------------- Cover description -------------------------------------- ------------ hydrologic soil group --------------- Hydrologic Cover type condition A B C D Pasture, grassland, or range continuous Poor 68 79 86 89 forage for grazing. 2/ Fair 49 69 79 84 Good 39 61 74 80 Meadow continuous grass, protected from 30 58 71 78 grazing and generally mowed for hay. Brush brush-weed-grass mixture with brush Poor 48 67 77 83 the major element. 3/ Fair 35 56 70 77 Good 30 4/ 48 65 73 Woods grass combination (orchard Poor 57 73 82 86 or tree farm). 5/ Fair 43 65 76 82 Good 32 58 72 79 Woods. 6/ Poor 45 66 77 83 Fair 36 60 73 79 Good 30 4/ 55 70 77 Farmsteads buildings, lanes, driveways, 59 74 82 86 and surrounding lots. 1 Average runoff condition, and I a = 0.2S. 2 Poor: <50%) ground cover or heavily grazed with no mulch. Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover and not heavily grazed. Good: > 75% ground cover and lightly or only occasionally grazed. 3 Poor: <50% ground cover. Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover. Good: >75% ground cover. 4 Actual curve number is less than 30; use CN = 30 for runoff computations. 5 CN s shown were computed for areas with 50% woods and 50% grass (pasture) cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the CN s for woods and pasture. 6 Poor: Forest litter, small trees, and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning. Fair: Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil. Good: Woods are protected from grazing, and litter and brush adequately cover the soil. (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 2 7

EISTING CONDITION TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS

Project: Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Sheet 1 of 1 Subject: Existing Condition Time of Concentration Calculations Computed By: RWP Date: 03-06-15 Project No.: 60405806 Checked By: Date: Basin Existing Condition Time of Concentration Calculations Sheet Flow Shallow Concentrated Flow T1 = (0.007*(n*L)^0.8) / (P2^0.5)*(s^0.4) *60min/hr Avg. Vel (V), Figure 3-1 T2 = (L/V) / 60 sec/min. Surface Mannings Flow 2yr-24hr Land Time Surface Flow Water Avg. Time Total Type Coeff. Lgth. Rainfall Slope Type Lgth. Course Vel. Time Slope n (1) L (2) P2 (3) s (4) T1 L s (4) V (5 & 6) T2 Tc (ft) (in) (ft/ft) (min) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (min) (min) 5 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.001 89.69 Unpaved 4547 0.001 0.6 136.30 225.99 5C Dense Grass 0.24 147 4.1 0.008 24.55 Unpaved 2734 0.001 0.5 85.26 109.81 6 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 1395 0.001 0.4 53.82 135.85 7 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 873 0.001 0.5 26.64 108.68 8 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 1676 0.001 0.4 70.88 152.91 9 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.003 67.97 Unpaved 564 0.001 0.6 16.54 84.51 16 Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 1052 0.001 0.6 30.91 80.14 16A Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 631 0.004 1.0 10.80 60.03 Paved 0.011 74 4.1 0.018 0.89 Unpaved 19 0.116 5.5 0.06 16B Grass 0.15 191 4.1 0.009 19.80 20.75 Total 20.69 16C Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 108 0.012 1.8 1.02 50.25 WETLAND 1 Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 360 0.008 1.4 4.22 53.45

PROPOSED CONDITION TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS

Project: Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Sheet 1 of 1 Subject: Proposed Condition Time of Concentration Calculations Computed By: RWP Date: 03-06-15 Project No.: 60405806 Checked By: Date: Basin Proposed Condition Time of Concentration Calculations Sheet Flow Shallow Concentrated Flow T1 = (0.007*(n*L)^0.8) / (P2^0.5)*(s^0.4) *60min/hr Avg. Vel (V), Figure 3-1 T2 = (L/V) / 60 sec/min. Surface Mannings Flow 2yr-24hr Land Time Surface Flow Water Avg. Time Total Type Coeff. Lgth. Rainfall Slope Type Lgth. Course Vel. Time Slope n (1) L (2) P2 (3) s (4) T1 L s (4) V (5 & 6) T2 Tc (ft) (in) (ft/ft) (min) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (min) (min) 5 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.001 89.69 Unpaved 4547 0.001 0.6 136.30 225.99 5C Dense Grass 0.24 147 4.1 0.008 24.55 Unpaved 2734 0.001 0.5 85.26 109.81 6 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 1395 0.001 0.4 53.82 135.85 7 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 873 0.001 0.5 26.64 108.68 8 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.002 82.03 Unpaved 1676 0.001 0.4 70.88 152.91 9 Dense Grass 0.24 300 4.1 0.003 67.97 Unpaved 564 0.001 0.6 16.54 84.51 16 Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 1052 0.001 0.6 30.91 80.14 Pavement 0.011 74 4.1 0.020 0.84 16A Grass 0.15 208 Total 4.1 0.009 21.28 22.11 Unpaved 965 0.002 0.8 21.37 43.48 Pavement 0.011 74 4.1 0.020 0.84 16B Grass 0.15 208 Total 4.1 0.009 21.28 22.11 Unpaved 716 0.003 0.9 13.66 35.77 16C Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 577 0.007 1.3 7.34 56.58 16D Grass 0.15 300 4.1 0.002 49.23 Unpaved 112 0.028 2.7 0.70 49.93

BACKUP DATA FOR TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS

Chapter 3 Time of Concentration and Travel Time Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Sheet flow Sheet flow is flow over plane surfaces. It usually occurs in the headwater of streams. With sheet flow, the friction value (Manning s n) is an effective roughness coefficient that includes the effect of raindrop impact; drag over the plane surface; obstacles such as litter, crop ridges, and rocks; and erosion and transportation of sediment. These n values are for very shallow flow depths of about 0.1 foot or so. Table 3-1 gives Manning s n values for sheet flow for various surface conditions. Table 3-1 Roughness coefficients (Manning s n) for sheet flow Surface description n 1/ Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt, gravel, or bare soil)... 0.011 Fallow (no residue)... 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover 20%... 0.06 Residue cover >20%... 0.17 Grass: Short grass prairie... 0.15 Dense grasses 2/... 0.24 Bermudagrass.... 0.41 Range (natural)... 0.13 Woods: 3/ Light underbrush... 0.40 Dense underbrush... 0.80 1 The n values are a composite of information compiled by Engman (1986). 2 Includes species such as weeping lovegrass, bluegrass, buffalo grass, blue grama grass, and native grass mixtures. 3 When selecting n, consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. This is the only part of the plant cover that will obstruct sheet flow. For sheet flow of less than 300 feet, use Manning s kinematic solution (Overtop and Meadows 1976) to compute T t : nl Tt = 0. 007( ).. ( P2 ) s where: 08. 05 04 [eq. 3-3] T t = travel time (hr), n = Manning s roughness coefficient (table 3-1) L = flow length (ft) P 2 = 2-year, 24-hour rainfall (in) s = slope of hydraulic grade line (land slope, ft/ft) This simplified form of the Manning s kinematic solution is based on the following: (1) shallow steady uniform flow, (2) constant intensity of rainfall excess (that part of a rain available for runoff), (3) rainfall duration of 24 hours, and (4) minor effect of infiltration on travel time. Rainfall depth can be obtained from appendix B. Shallow concentrated flow After a maximum of 300 feet, sheet flow usually becomes shallow concentrated flow. The average velocity for this flow can be determined from figure 3-1, in which average velocity is a function of watercourse slope and type of channel. For slopes less than 0.005 ft/ft, use equations given in appendix F for figure 3-1. Tillage can affect the direction of shallow concentrated flow. Flow may not always be directly down the watershed slope if tillage runs across the slope. After determining average velocity in figure 3-1, use equation 3-1 to estimate travel time for the shallow concentrated flow segment. Open channels Open channels are assumed to begin where surveyed cross section information has been obtained, where channels are visible on aerial photographs, or where blue lines (indicating streams) appear on United States Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle sheets. Manning s equation or water surface profile information can be used to estimate average flow velocity. Average flow velocity is usually determined for bankfull elevation. (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 3 3

Appendix F Equations for figures and exhibits This appendix presents the equations used in procedure applications to generate figures and exhibits in TR-55. Figure 2-1 (runoff equation): P. 2 1000 10 CN Q = P + 08. 1000 10 CN where Q = runoff (in) P = rainfall (in) CN = runoff curve number Figure 2-3 (composite CN with connected impervious area): Pimp CNc = CNp + CN ( 98 p) 100 where CN c = composite runoff curve number CN p = pervious runoff curve number P imp = percent imperviousness. Figure 2-4 (composite CN with unconnected impervious areas and total impervious area less than 30%): Pimp CNc = CNp + CNp R ( 98 ) 1 0. 5 100 where R = ratio of unconnected impervious area to total impervious area. 2 ( ) Figure 3-1 (average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow): Unpaved V = 16.1345 (s) 0.5 Paved V = 20.3282 (s) 0.5 where V= average velocity (ft/s) s = slope of hydraulic grade line (watercourse slope, ft/ft) These two equations are based on the solution of Manning s equation (eq. 3-4) with different assumptions for n (Manning s roughness coefficient) and r (hydraulic radius, ft). For unpaved areas, n is 0.05 and r is 0.4; for paved areas, n is 0.025 and r is 0.2. Exhibit 4 (unit peak discharges for SCS tvpe I, IA, II, and III distributions): 2 ( u)= o + ( c)+ ( c) log q C C log T C log T 1 2[ ] where q u = unit peak discharge (csm/in) T c = time of concentration (hr) (minimum, 0.1; maximum, 10.0) C 0, C 1, C 2 = coefficients from table F-1 Figure 6-1 (approximate detention basin routing through single- and multiple-stage structures for 24-hour rainfalls of the indicated type): C q 2 o o C q o + 2 + 3 1 q1 q1 VS C C q = o + 1 Vr q where V s /V r = ratio of storage volume (V s ) to runoff volume (V r ) q o /q i = ratio of peak outflow discharge (q o ) to peak inflow discharge (q i ) C 0, C 1, C 2, C 3 = coefficients from table F-2 3 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) F 1

APPENDI B EISTING CONDITION ICPR INPUT AND OUTPUT

EISTING CONDITION ICPR LINK- NODE CONNECTIVITY

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition Basin Link Node ICPR Connectivity Report Name Group From Node To Node Type U/S Geometry D/S Geometry Flow Dir Count ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161-141 BASE 16-1 14-1 Pipe Circular Circular Both 3 51-161C BASE 5-1 16-1C Pipe Circular Circular Both 2 161B-161C BASE 16-1B 16-1C Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 161C-161 BASE 16-1C 16-1 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 52-53 BASE 5-2 5-3 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 53-54 BASE 5-3 5-4 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 54-51 BASE 5-4 5-1 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 161-171 BASE 16-1 17-1 Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 161_141 BASE 16-1 14-1 Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 161A-161B BASE 16-1A 16-1B Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 51_161C BASE 5-1 16-1C Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 52-5B1 BASE 5-2 5B-1 Vertical WGO Fread Irregular Both 1 61-51 BASE 6-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 71-51 BASE 7-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 71-81 BASE 7-1 8-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 81-51 BASE 8-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 81-91 BASE 8-1 9-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 91-51 BASE 9-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 WET1-161B BASE WETLAND 1 16-1B Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1

1 2 3 4 5 D T:5B-1 D W:52-5B1 A:5-2 A:6-1 U:6 W:71-81 A:7-1 A:16-1A U:7 U:16A C:52-53 W:161A-161B A:5-3 U:5C W:61-51 A:8-1 U:8 C A:WETLAND 1 U:WETLAND 1 W:WET1-161B A:16-1B U:16B C:53-54 A:5-4 W:81-51 A:9-1 U:9 W:81-91 C C:161B-161C C:54-51 W:91-51 W:71-51 A:16-1A U:16A T:14-1 T:14-1 P:161-141 W:161_141 A:16-1 U:16 C:161C-161 A:16-1C U:16C W:51_161C P:51-161C A:5-1 U:5 W:51_161C P:51-161C W:161-171 T:17-1 B B A A URS Corporation 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, FL 33607-1462 Tel: 813.286.1711 PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT 28000 A-1 Airport Road Punta Gorda, FL 33982 1 2 3 4 5 CONSTRUCT TAIWAY "A" ETENSION EISTING CONDITION BASIN-LINK-NODE CONNECTIVITY DIAGRAM B-1

EISTING CONDITION ICPR INPUT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report ========================================================================================== ==== Basins ============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 16 Node: 16-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 80.14 Area(ac): 23.420 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 83.18 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16A Node: 16-1A Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 60.03 Area(ac): 15.450 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 83.86 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16B Node: 16-1B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 20.75 Area(ac): 3.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 85.45 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16C Node: 16-1C Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 50.25 Area(ac): 17.000 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 85.54 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 5 Node: 5-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 225.99 Area(ac): 124.040 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 76.23 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 5C Node: 5-3 Status: Onsite Page 1 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 109.81 Area(ac): 27.390 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.47 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 6 Node: 6-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 135.85 Area(ac): 29.070 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 73.85 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 7 Node: 7-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 108.68 Area(ac): 24.980 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 75.44 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 8 Node: 8-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 152.91 Area(ac): 46.040 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 73.82 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 9 Node: 9-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 84.51 Area(ac): 17.860 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 79.11 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: WETLAND 1 Node: WETLAND 1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 53.45 Area(ac): 9.680 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Page 2 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Curve Number: 80.54 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 14-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 12.390 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 19.360 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 12.390 3.00 12.660 6.00 13.560 9.00 16.860 17.86 18.720 18.00 18.500 21.00 16.760 24.00 16.360 36.00 12.860 48.00 12.390 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 13.830 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1A Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 18.500 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 17.500 0.0001 18.000 0.0170 18.500 0.0680 19.000 0.2100 19.500 0.4300 20.000 0.6800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1B Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.900 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.700 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1C Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.400 Type: Stage/Area Page 3 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 17-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 14.180 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 14.180 3.00 15.500 6.00 16.200 9.00 17.000 15.06 19.880 18.00 18.200 21.00 17.860 24.00 16.000 36.00 15.200 48.00 14.180 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 18.260 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 17.860 2.5000 19.860 12.6900 20.860 20.2600 21.860 75.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-2 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.860 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.860 0.0100 21.860 0.4000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-3 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.760 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 18.860 0.5000 21.860 20.9200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-4 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.160 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.160 0.0100 Page 4 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report 21.860 0.1000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5B-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.260 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 19.260 3.00 19.460 6.00 19.860 9.00 20.660 15.00 21.110 18.00 20.660 21.00 20.360 24.00 19.760 36.00 19.460 48.00 19.260 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 6-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 21.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 22.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 21.560 2.8600 22.860 24.9600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 7-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 22.360 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.560 0.2000 20.860 2.0000 21.860 10.0000 22.860 15.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 8-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 20.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 20.360 5.7600 21.860 26.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 9-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 20.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 20.360 5.6200 21.860 11.0000 Page 5 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: WETLAND 1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.900 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 19.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 17.500 0.0200 18.000 0.0700 18.500 0.2200 19.000 0.4800 19.500 1.2500 19.860 3.1400 ========================================================================================== ==== Cross Sections ====================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161 Encroachment: No Group: BASE Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 19.860 0.035000 71.200 19.860 0.035000 159.300 18.860 0.035000 215.500 17.860 0.070000 222.600 13.830 0.070000 235.500 13.830 0.070000 240.400 17.860 0.070000 254.200 18.860 0.035000 388.900 19.860 0.035000 595.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161A-161B Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.500 0.035000 17.800 20.000 0.035000 21.500 19.500 0.035000 24.800 19.000 0.035000 37.800 18.500 0.035000 51.300 18.500 0.035000 74.300 19.000 0.035000 86.500 19.500 0.035000 162.900 20.000 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161B Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.700 0.035000 33.800 20.700 0.035000 66.300 20.100 0.035000 76.700 19.100 0.035000 82.000 18.100 0.070000 86.100 17.900 0.070000 Page 6 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report 89.400 18.000 0.070000 93.900 19.400 0.070000 243.200 19.400 0.035000 293.700 19.500 0.035000 343.300 19.500 0.035000 403.100 19.500 0.035000 648.200 19.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161CN Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.400 0.035000 40.000 20.100 0.035000 49.800 20.000 0.035000 65.600 19.600 0.035000 81.500 18.700 0.035000 89.000 17.600 0.070000 93.900 17.000 0.070000 97.900 17.400 0.070000 103.200 18.600 0.070000 126.000 21.000 0.035000 144.200 20.900 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161CS Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.400 0.035000 63.200 20.700 0.035000 155.900 20.200 0.035000 197.500 18.700 0.035000 206.100 17.400 0.070000 213.100 17.000 0.070000 222.100 17.500 0.070000 230.700 18.400 0.070000 242.600 19.400 0.035000 258.300 20.000 0.035000 268.300 20.100 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-53 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.860 0.035000 10.000 20.360 0.035000 15.000 20.260 0.070000 28.000 19.760 0.070000 40.000 19.860 0.070000 45.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-5B1 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- Page 7 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report 0.000 23.960 0.015000 9.800 23.860 0.015000 75.100 22.860 0.015000 178.400 21.860 0.045000 267.200 21.860 0.045000 290.900 21.860 0.045000 300.900 21.860 0.045000 326.800 22.060 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 53-54 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.860 0.035000 40.000 20.360 0.035000 42.000 20.260 0.070000 45.000 20.060 0.070000 50.000 19.960 0.070000 55.000 20.360 0.070000 57.000 20.260 0.070000 59.000 20.060 0.070000 65.000 19.760 0.070000 67.000 19.660 0.070000 72.000 19.160 0.070000 75.000 19.860 0.070000 80.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 54-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.360 0.035000 4.000 20.260 0.070000 6.000 20.060 0.070000 10.000 19.960 0.070000 15.000 20.360 0.070000 17.000 20.260 0.070000 20.000 20.060 0.070000 24.000 19.760 0.070000 27.000 19.660 0.070000 35.000 19.160 0.070000 40.000 19.860 0.070000 50.000 19.860 0.100000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.860 0.045000 105.000 21.360 0.045000 210.000 21.860 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-91 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N Page 8 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.860 0.045000 40.000 21.760 0.045000 81.000 21.860 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 91-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.360 0.045000 95.000 21.360 0.045000 190.000 21.860 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: WET1-161B Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 19.500 0.035000 33.500 19.000 0.035000 66.100 18.500 0.035000 69.000 17.900 0.035000 94.500 18.500 0.035000 110.400 19.000 0.035000 249.500 19.500 0.035000 307.900 20.000 0.035000 347.700 20.500 0.035000 445.400 21.000 0.035000 ========================================================================================== ==== Pipes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161-141 From Node: 16-1 Length(ft): 196.00 Group: BASE To Node: 14-1 Count: 3 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 24.00 24.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 24.00 24.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 13.830 13.600 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 51-161C From Node: 5-1 Length(ft): 534.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Count: 2 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 18.400 16.800 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Page 9 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ========================================================================================== ==== Channels ============================================================================ ========================================================================================== Name: 161B-161C From Node: 16-1B Length(ft): 691.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 17.900 17.000 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 161B 161CN Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161C-161 From Node: 16-1C Length(ft): 1822.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 16.800 13.830 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 161CS 161 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-53 From Node: 5-2 Length(ft): 1300.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-3 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Page 10 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Invert(ft): 19.860 19.760 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 52-53 52-53 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 53-54 From Node: 5-3 Length(ft): 900.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-4 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 19.760 19.160 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 53-54 53-54 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 54-51 From Node: 5-4 Length(ft): 700.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 19.160 18.160 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 54-51 54-51 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ========================================================================================== ==== Weirs =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161-171 From Node: 16-1 Page 11 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Group: BASE To Node: 17-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 20.560 Control Elevation(ft): 20.560 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161_141 From Node: 16-1 Group: BASE To Node: 14-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 20.360 Control Elevation(ft): 20.360 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161A-161B From Node: 16-1A Group: BASE To Node: 16-1B Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 161A-161B Invert(ft): 18.500 Control Elevation(ft): 18.500 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 51_161C From Node: 5-1 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 600.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 22.860 Control Elevation(ft): 22.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 12 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Name: 52-5B1 From Node: 5-2 Group: BASE To Node: 5B-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Irregular Sec: 52-5B1 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 61-51 From Node: 6-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 1200.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 71-51 From Node: 7-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 1200.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 71-81 From Node: 7-1 Group: BASE To Node: 8-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE Page 13 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-51 From Node: 8-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 81-51 Invert(ft): 21.360 Control Elevation(ft): 21.360 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-91 From Node: 8-1 Group: BASE To Node: 9-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 81-91 Invert(ft): 21.760 Control Elevation(ft): 21.760 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 91-51 From Node: 9-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 91-51 Invert(ft): 21.360 Control Elevation(ft): 21.360 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: WET1-161B From Node: WETLAND 1 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1B Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: WET1-161B Invert(ft): 17.900 Control Elevation(ft): 17.900 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE Page 14 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report ========================================================================================== ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 233yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\EISTING\233yr-24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 4.50 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.00 30.000 5.00 38.000 15.00 48.000 30.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\EISTING\25yr-24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 8.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.00 30.000 5.00 38.000 15.00 48.000 30.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ========================================================================================== Name: 233yr-24hr Hydrology Sim: 233yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\EISTING\233yr-24hr.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.05000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.1000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.000 30.000 5.000 38.000 15.000 48.000 30.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25yr-24hr Hydrology Sim: 25yr-24hr Page 15 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition ICPR Input Report Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\EISTING\25yr-24hr.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.05000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.1000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.000 30.000 5.000 38.000 15.000 48.000 30.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Page 16 of 16

EISTING CONDITION ICPR BASIN MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition Basin Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Simulation Basin Group Time Max Flow Max Volume Volume hrs cfs in ft3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 233yr-24hr 16 BASE 12.92 14.394 2.740 232940.4 25yr-24hr 16 BASE 12.83 31.576 5.995 509627.8 233yr-24hr 16A BASE 12.67 11.883 2.801 157104.4 25yr-24hr 16A BASE 12.67 25.646 6.073 340613.9 233yr-24hr 16B BASE 12.17 4.698 2.949 33724.6 25yr-24hr 16B BASE 12.13 9.808 6.263 71609.1 233yr-24hr 16C BASE 12.50 15.500 2.956 182441.1 25yr-24hr 16C BASE 12.50 32.557 6.270 386919.6 233yr-24hr 5 BASE 14.92 26.384 2.148 966953.9 25yr-24hr 5 BASE 14.75 65.972 5.183 2333660.8 233yr-24hr 5C BASE 13.33 13.006 2.676 266105.4 25yr-24hr 5C BASE 13.25 29.046 5.912 587771.4 233yr-24hr 6 BASE 13.67 8.230 1.960 206810.3 25yr-24hr 6 BASE 13.58 21.609 4.906 517700.5 233yr-24hr 7 BASE 13.33 9.008 2.084 188958.3 25yr-24hr 7 BASE 13.25 22.874 5.090 461510.1 233yr-24hr 8 BASE 13.92 11.887 1.958 327154.8 25yr-24hr 8 BASE 13.83 31.235 4.903 819341.4 233yr-24hr 9 BASE 13.00 9.062 2.385 154645.7 25yr-24hr 9 BASE 12.92 21.412 5.520 357860.0 233yr-24hr WETLAND 1 BASE 12.58 7.139 2.506 88055.3 25yr-24hr WETLAND 1 BASE 12.58 16.298 5.683 199708.6 Page 1 of 1

EISTING CONDITION ICPR NODE MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition Node Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.86 18.720 19.360 0.0183 29 13.54 30.717 0.00 0.000 14-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 17.85 18.718 19.360-0.0262 29 13.77 47.794 0.00 0.000 16-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.89 18.792 20.860 0.0352 73216 13.08 35.763 13.54 30.717 16-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.30 19.524 20.860 0.0254 185655 13.00 71.835 13.77 47.794 16-1A BASE 233yr-24hr 13.39 19.500 18.500 0.0170 18737 12.67 11.882 13.39 38.396 16-1A BASE 25yr-24hr 13.28 19.706 18.500 0.0224 23228 12.66 25.644 12.15 28.736 16-1B BASE 233yr-24hr 13.29 19.467 20.700 0.0471 55086 13.39 123.769 13.32 15.895 16-1B BASE 25yr-24hr 13.65 19.707 20.700 0.0471 126674 12.15 84.060 12.77 37.442 16-1C BASE 233yr-24hr 17.99 18.848 20.400 0.0080 63390 12.60 27.594 13.39 22.091 16-1C BASE 25yr-24hr 15.15 19.605 20.400 0.0141 166011 12.62 66.326 13.05 40.636 17-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 15.06 19.880 20.860-0.0103 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 17-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.07 19.877 20.860-0.0095 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 5-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 25.79 19.799 20.860 0.0041 554290 15.97 27.392 23.73 11.989 5-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 29.79 21.313 20.860 0.0104 1979738 14.92 80.822 25.32 16.012 5-2 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.53 20.358 21.860 0.0011 23057 0.00 0.000 32.53 0.023 5-2 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.05 21.315 21.860 0.0040 42041 0.00 0.000 47.94 0.203 5-3 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.63 20.358 21.860 0.0022 490575 13.25 12.970 26.54 0.643 5-3 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.04 21.315 21.860 0.0042 810769 13.18 28.557 46.20 3.933 5-4 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.28 19.843 21.860 0.0011 15244 26.54 0.643 29.43 0.698 5-4 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.37 21.311 21.860 0.0108 55669 46.20 3.933 48.00 4.326 5B-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 15.00 21.110 21.860 0.0044 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 5B-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.00 21.110 21.860 0.0044 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 6-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.57 21.921 22.860 0.0021 392133 13.68 8.230 17.57 4.250 6-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.12 22.010 22.860 0.0036 458131 13.60 21.608 15.12 16.336 7-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 35.01 21.499 22.360 0.0084 309736 13.33 9.007 0.00 0.000 7-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.28 21.899 22.360 0.0144 444143 13.25 22.872 19.28 6.526 8-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 39.51 21.160 21.860 0.0016 721382 13.92 11.887 0.00 0.000 8-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 23.47 21.574 21.860 0.0035 964191 13.83 31.234 23.47 9.858 9-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 32.51 21.052 21.860 0.0017 352891 13.00 9.061 0.00 0.000 9-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.84 21.412 21.860 0.0041 409102 12.92 21.409 19.84 3.206 WETLAND 1 BASE 233yr-24hr 13.39 19.488 19.860-0.0170 53647 12.58 7.138 13.39 84.029 WETLAND 1 BASE 25yr-24hr 13.30 19.692 19.860 0.0189 98277 12.58 16.296 12.15 45.603 Page 1 of 1

EISTING CONDITION ICPR LINK MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition Link Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Max Time Max Max Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Flow Flow Delta Q US Stage US Stage DS Stage DS Stage hrs cfs cfs hrs ft hrs ft -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161-141 BASE 233yr-24hr 13.54 30.717 3.063 17.89 18.792 17.86 18.720 161-141 BASE 25yr-24hr 13.77 47.794 4.256 15.30 19.524 17.85 18.718 161-171 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 17.89 18.792 15.06 19.880 161-171 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 15.30 19.524 15.07 19.877 161_141 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 17.89 18.792 17.86 18.720 161_141 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 15.30 19.524 17.85 18.718 161A-161B BASE 233yr-24hr 13.39 38.396 31.019 13.39 19.500 13.29 19.467 161A-161B BASE 25yr-24hr 12.15 28.736 28.801 13.28 19.706 13.65 19.707 161B-161C BASE 233yr-24hr 13.32 15.895 0.914 13.29 19.467 17.99 18.848 161B-161C BASE 25yr-24hr 12.77 37.442 8.750 13.65 19.707 15.15 19.605 161C-161 BASE 233yr-24hr 13.39 22.091 0.333 17.99 18.848 17.89 18.792 161C-161 BASE 25yr-24hr 13.05 40.636 0.405 15.15 19.605 15.30 19.524 51-161C BASE 233yr-24hr 23.73 11.989 0.229 25.79 19.799 17.99 18.848 51-161C BASE 25yr-24hr 25.32 16.012 1.147 29.79 21.313 15.15 19.605 51_161C BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 25.79 19.799 17.99 18.848 51_161C BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 29.79 21.313 15.15 19.605 52-53 BASE 233yr-24hr 32.53 0.023 0.015 26.53 20.358 26.63 20.358 52-53 BASE 25yr-24hr 47.94 0.203-0.293 30.05 21.315 30.04 21.315 52-5B1 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 26.53 20.358 15.00 21.110 52-5B1 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 30.05 21.315 15.00 21.110 53-54 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.54 0.643 0.001 26.63 20.358 26.28 19.843 53-54 BASE 25yr-24hr 46.20 3.933 2.987 30.04 21.315 30.37 21.311 54-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 29.43 0.698 0.002 26.28 19.843 25.79 19.799 54-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 48.00 4.326-2.336 30.37 21.311 29.79 21.313 61-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.57 4.250 0.014 17.57 21.921 25.79 19.799 61-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.12 16.336 0.277 15.12 22.010 29.79 21.313 71-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 35.01 21.499 25.79 19.799 71-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.28 2.175 0.047 19.28 21.899 29.79 21.313 71-81 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 35.01 21.499 39.51 21.160 71-81 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.28 4.350 0.095 19.28 21.899 23.47 21.574 81-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 39.51 21.160 25.79 19.799 81-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 23.47 9.858 0.041 23.47 21.574 29.79 21.313 Page 1 of 2

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Existing Condition Link Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report 81-91 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 39.51 21.160 32.51 21.052 81-91 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 23.47 21.574 19.84 21.412 91-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 32.51 21.052 25.79 19.799 91-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.84 3.206 0.041 19.84 21.412 29.79 21.313 WET1-161B BASE 233yr-24hr 13.39 84.029 62.284 13.39 19.488 13.29 19.467 WET1-161B BASE 25yr-24hr 12.15 45.603 66.986 13.30 19.692 13.65 19.707 Page 2 of 2

APPENDI C PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR INPUT AND OUTPUT

PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR LINK- NODE CONNECTIVITY

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition Basin Link Node Connectivity Report Name Group From Node To Node Type U/S Geometry D/S Geometry Flow Dir Count ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161-141 BASE 16-1 14-1 Pipe Circular Circular Both 3 161A-161D BASE 16-1A 16-1D Pipe Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Both 2 161B-161C BASE 16-1B 16-1C Pipe Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Both 2 51-161B BASE 5-1 16-1B Pipe Circular Circular Both 2 161C-161 BASE 16-1C 16-1 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 161D-161C BASE 16-1D 16-1C Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 52-53 BASE 5-2 5-3 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 53-54 BASE 5-3 5-4 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 54-51 BASE 5-4 5-1 Channel Irregular Irregular Both 1 161-171 BASE 16-1 17-1 Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 161_141 BASE 16-1 14-1 Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 51_161C BASE 5-1 16-1C Vertical WGO Paved Rectangular Both 1 52-5B1 BASE 5-2 5B-1 Vertical WGO Fread Irregular Both 1 61-51 BASE 6-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 71-51 BASE 7-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 71-81 BASE 7-1 8-1 Vertical WGO Fread Rectangular Both 1 81-51 BASE 8-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 81-91 BASE 8-1 9-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 91-51 BASE 9-1 5-1 Vertical WGO Mavis Irregular Both 1 BASE Drop Structure Circular Circular Both 1

1 2 3 4 5 D D T:5B-1 A:16-1A U:16A W:52-5B1 A:6-1 U:6 W:71-81 A:7-1 U:7 P:161A-161D A:5-2 W:61-51 A:8-1 U:8 A:16-1D U:16D C:52-53 C A:5-3 U:5C W:81-51 W:81-91 C C:161D-161C A:16-1B U:16B P:51-161B C:53-54 A:9-1 A:5-4 U:9 A:16-1A U:16A W:91-51 P:161B-161C C:54-51 T:14-1 T:14-1 P:161-141 W:161_141 A:16-1 U:16 C:161C-161 A:16-1C U:16C W:51_161C A:5-1 U:5 W:71-51 P:161-141 W:161_141 W:161-171 T:17-1 B B A A URS Corporation 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, FL 33607-1462 Tel: 813.286.1711 PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT 28000 A-1 Airport Road Punta Gorda, FL 33982 1 2 3 4 5 CONSTRUCT TAIWAY "A" ETENSION PROPOSED CONDITION BASIN-LINK-NODE CONNECTIVITY DIAGRAM C-1

PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR INPUT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report ========================================================================================== ==== Basins ============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 16 Node: 16-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 80.14 Area(ac): 22.360 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 83.07 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.90 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16A Node: 16-1A Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 43.48 Area(ac): 11.310 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 86.07 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.90 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16B Node: 16-1B Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 35.77 Area(ac): 10.580 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 86.57 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.90 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16C Node: 16-1C Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 56.58 Area(ac): 16.640 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 84.19 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.90 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 16D Node: 16-1D Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 49.93 Area(ac): 7.810 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 84.26 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.90 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 5 Node: 5-1 Status: Onsite Page 1 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 225.99 Area(ac): 124.020 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 76.23 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 8.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 5C Node: 5-3 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 109.81 Area(ac): 27.390 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.47 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 6 Node: 6-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 135.85 Area(ac): 29.070 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 73.85 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 7 Node: 7-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 108.68 Area(ac): 24.980 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 75.44 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 3.04 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 8 Node: 8-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 152.91 Area(ac): 46.040 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 73.82 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.85 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 9 Node: 9-1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 84.51 Area(ac): 17.860 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Page 2 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Curve Number: 79.11 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 22.10 ========================================================================================== ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 14-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 12.390 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 19.360 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 12.390 3.00 12.660 6.00 13.560 9.00 16.860 17.86 18.720 18.00 18.500 21.00 16.760 24.00 16.360 36.00 12.860 48.00 12.390 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 13.830 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1A Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.700 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 17.700 0.0100 18.000 0.0820 18.500 0.3200 19.000 0.7000 19.500 1.2300 20.000 1.8600 20.500 2.6000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1B Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 16.600 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 16.600 0.0100 17.000 0.0660 17.500 0.1100 18.000 0.2100 18.500 0.3700 19.000 0.6100 19.500 0.9000 Page 3 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report 20.000 1.4100 20.500 2.2100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1C Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.400 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 16-1D Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 17.670 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.600 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 17-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 14.180 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 14.180 3.00 15.500 6.00 16.200 9.00 17.000 15.06 19.880 18.00 18.200 21.00 17.860 24.00 16.000 36.00 15.200 48.00 14.180 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 18.260 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 20.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 17.860 2.5000 19.860 12.6900 20.860 20.2600 21.860 75.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-2 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.860 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.860 0.0100 21.860 0.4000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-3 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.760 Page 4 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 18.860 0.5000 21.860 20.9200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5-4 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.160 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.160 0.0100 21.860 0.1000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 5B-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.260 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 19.260 3.00 19.460 6.00 19.860 9.00 20.660 15.00 21.110 18.00 20.660 21.00 20.360 24.00 19.760 36.00 19.460 48.00 19.260 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 6-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 21.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 22.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 21.560 2.8600 22.860 24.9600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 7-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 22.360 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 19.560 0.2000 20.860 2.0000 21.860 10.0000 22.860 15.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 8-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 20.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Page 5 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 20.360 5.7600 21.860 26.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 9-1 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 20.560 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.860 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 20.360 5.6200 21.860 11.0000 ========================================================================================== ==== Cross Sections ====================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161 Encroachment: No Group: BASE Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 19.860 0.035000 71.200 19.860 0.035000 159.300 18.860 0.035000 215.500 17.860 0.070000 222.600 13.830 0.070000 235.500 13.830 0.070000 240.400 17.860 0.070000 254.200 18.860 0.035000 388.900 19.860 0.035000 595.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161CN Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.500 0.035000 8.300 21.000 0.035000 18.200 20.500 0.035000 33.600 20.000 0.035000 49.800 19.500 0.035000 66.400 19.000 0.035000 82.800 18.500 0.035000 94.800 18.000 0.070000 100.200 17.500 0.070000 105.600 17.000 0.070000 110.900 16.500 0.070000 114.350 16.340 0.070000 117.800 16.500 0.070000 120.800 17.000 0.070000 123.800 17.500 0.070000 126.800 18.000 0.070000 129.800 18.500 0.070000 132.800 19.000 0.035000 135.800 19.500 0.035000 138.800 20.000 0.035000 Page 6 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report 141.800 20.500 0.035000 164.400 20.800 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161CS Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.400 0.035000 26.000 21.000 0.035000 78.600 20.500 0.035000 117.400 20.000 0.035000 170.800 19.500 0.035000 184.800 19.000 0.035000 195.900 18.500 0.070000 198.400 18.000 0.070000 201.100 17.500 0.070000 204.700 16.340 0.070000 213.400 16.340 0.070000 224.000 17.500 0.070000 226.400 18.000 0.070000 228.700 18.500 0.070000 231.100 19.000 0.070000 234.500 19.500 0.035000 239.900 20.000 0.035000 245.400 20.500 0.035000 311.800 20.800 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161D Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.500 0.035000 10.000 20.000 0.035000 26.700 19.500 0.035000 58.700 19.000 0.035000 88.400 18.500 0.035000 94.200 18.000 0.070000 101.800 17.670 0.070000 105.600 18.000 0.070000 108.600 18.500 0.070000 111.600 19.000 0.035000 114.600 19.500 0.035000 117.600 20.000 0.035000 120.600 20.500 0.035000 172.200 20.800 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-53 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.860 0.035000 10.000 20.360 0.035000 15.000 20.260 0.070000 28.000 19.760 0.070000 40.000 19.860 0.070000 45.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-5B1 Group: BASE Page 7 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 23.960 0.015000 9.800 23.860 0.015000 75.100 22.860 0.015000 178.400 21.860 0.045000 267.200 21.860 0.045000 290.900 21.860 0.045000 300.900 21.860 0.045000 326.800 22.060 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 53-54 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.860 0.035000 40.000 20.360 0.035000 42.000 20.260 0.070000 45.000 20.060 0.070000 50.000 19.960 0.070000 55.000 20.360 0.070000 57.000 20.260 0.070000 59.000 20.060 0.070000 65.000 19.760 0.070000 67.000 19.660 0.070000 72.000 19.160 0.070000 75.000 19.860 0.070000 80.000 20.860 0.035000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 54-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 20.360 0.035000 4.000 20.260 0.070000 6.000 20.060 0.070000 10.000 19.960 0.070000 15.000 20.360 0.070000 17.000 20.260 0.070000 20.000 20.060 0.070000 24.000 19.760 0.070000 27.000 19.660 0.070000 35.000 19.160 0.070000 40.000 19.860 0.070000 50.000 19.860 0.100000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.860 0.045000 105.000 21.360 0.045000 210.000 21.860 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 8 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Name: 81-91 Encroachment: No Group: BASE Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.860 0.045000 40.000 21.760 0.045000 81.000 21.860 0.045000 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 91-51 Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 21.360 0.045000 95.000 21.360 0.045000 190.000 21.860 0.045000 ========================================================================================== ==== Pipes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161-141 From Node: 16-1 Length(ft): 196.00 Group: BASE To Node: 14-1 Count: 3 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 24.00 24.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 24.00 24.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 13.830 13.600 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161A-161D From Node: 16-1A Length(ft): 282.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1D Count: 2 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Flow: Both Span(in): 23.00 23.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 14.00 14.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 17.700 17.670 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Page 9 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161B-161C From Node: 16-1B Length(ft): 256.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Count: 2 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Flow: Both Span(in): 23.00 23.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 14.00 14.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 16.600 16.340 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 51-161B From Node: 5-1 Length(ft): 534.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1B Count: 2 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 18.400 16.800 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ========================================================================================== ==== Channels ============================================================================ ========================================================================================== Name: 161C-161 From Node: 16-1C Length(ft): 1509.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 16.340 13.830 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 161CS 161 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): Page 10 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161D-161C From Node: 16-1D Length(ft): 1538.00 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 17.670 16.340 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 161D 161CN Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-53 From Node: 5-2 Length(ft): 1300.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-3 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 19.860 19.760 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 52-53 52-53 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 53-54 From Node: 5-3 Length(ft): 900.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-4 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 19.760 19.160 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 53-54 53-54 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): Page 11 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report RtSdSlp(h/v): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 54-51 From Node: 5-4 Length(ft): 700.00 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Irregular Irregular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Invert(ft): 19.160 18.160 Flow: Both TClpInitZ(ft): 9999.000 9999.000 Contraction Coef: 0.100 Manning's N: Expansion Coef: 0.300 Top Clip(ft): Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Bot Clip(ft): Exit Loss Coef: 0.000 Main Sec: 54-51 54-51 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw AuxElev1(ft): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Aux Sec1: Stabilizer Option: None AuxElev2(ft): 0.000 0.000 Aux Sec2: Top Width(ft): Depth(ft): Bot Width(ft): LtSdSlp(h/v): RtSdSlp(h/v): ========================================================================================== ==== Drop Structures ===================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: From Node: Length(ft): 0.00 Group: BASE To Node: Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Most Restrictive Span(in): 0.00 0.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 0.00 0.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.000 Invert(ft): 0.000 0.000 Exit Loss Coef: 1.000 Manning's N: 0.000000 0.000000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ========================================================================================== ==== Weirs =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 161-171 From Node: 16-1 Group: BASE To Node: 17-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 20.560 Control Elevation(ft): 20.560 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE Page 12 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 161_141 From Node: 16-1 Group: BASE To Node: 14-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 20.360 Control Elevation(ft): 20.360 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 51_161C From Node: 5-1 Group: BASE To Node: 16-1C Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Paved Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 600.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 22.860 Control Elevation(ft): 22.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.000 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 52-5B1 From Node: 5-2 Group: BASE To Node: 5B-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Irregular Sec: 52-5B1 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 61-51 From Node: 6-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 1200.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 TABLE Page 13 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 71-51 From Node: 7-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 1200.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 71-81 From Node: 7-1 Group: BASE To Node: 8-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 2400.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Invert(ft): 21.860 Control Elevation(ft): 21.860 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-51 From Node: 8-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 81-51 Invert(ft): 21.360 Control Elevation(ft): 21.360 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 81-91 From Node: 8-1 Group: BASE To Node: 9-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 81-91 Invert(ft): 21.760 Control Elevation(ft): 21.760 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 TABLE Page 14 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 91-51 From Node: 9-1 Group: BASE To Node: 5-1 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular Sec: 91-51 Invert(ft): 21.360 Control Elevation(ft): 21.360 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 999.00 Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.800 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ========================================================================================== ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 233yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\PROPOSED\233yr-24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 4.50 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.00 30.000 5.00 38.000 15.00 48.000 30.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\PROPOSED\25yr-24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 8.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.00 30.000 5.00 38.000 15.00 48.000 30.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ========================================================================================== Name: 233yr-24hr Hydrology Sim: 233yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\PROPOSED\233yr-24hr.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Page 15 of 16

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition ICPR Input Report Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.05000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.1000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.000 30.000 5.000 38.000 15.000 48.000 30.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25yr-24hr Hydrology Sim: 25yr-24hr Filename: S:\Projects\C\Charlotte Co Airport Authority\12012316_TWAExt\Design\Drainage\Drainage Calcs\ICPR\PROPOSED\25yr-24hr.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.05000 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 48.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.1000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 10.000 15.000 30.000 5.000 38.000 15.000 48.000 30.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Page 16 of 16

PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR BASIN MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition Basin Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Simulation Basin Group Time Max Flow Max Volume Volume hrs cfs in ft3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 233yr-24hr 16 BASE 12.92 13.749 2.745 222808.2 25yr-24hr 16 BASE 12.83 30.141 5.999 486908.6 233yr-24hr 16A BASE 12.42 11.507 3.019 123957.5 25yr-24hr 16A BASE 12.42 23.886 6.347 260584.8 233yr-24hr 16B BASE 12.32 12.266 3.066 117733.6 25yr-24hr 16B BASE 12.32 25.220 6.404 245964.3 233yr-24hr 16C BASE 12.58 13.508 2.847 171957.2 25yr-24hr 16C BASE 12.58 28.976 6.131 370322.8 233yr-24hr 16D BASE 12.50 6.882 2.851 80835.8 25yr-24hr 16D BASE 12.50 14.727 6.135 173928.0 233yr-24hr 5 BASE 14.92 28.567 2.328 1047866.9 25yr-24hr 5 BASE 14.75 68.402 5.400 2431044.6 233yr-24hr 5C BASE 13.33 13.006 2.676 266105.4 25yr-24hr 5C BASE 13.25 29.046 5.912 587771.4 233yr-24hr 6 BASE 13.67 8.230 1.960 206810.3 25yr-24hr 6 BASE 13.58 21.609 4.906 517700.5 233yr-24hr 7 BASE 13.33 9.293 2.154 195335.3 25yr-24hr 7 BASE 13.25 23.180 5.175 469243.6 233yr-24hr 8 BASE 13.92 12.012 1.978 330621.6 25yr-24hr 8 BASE 13.83 31.374 4.928 823594.3 233yr-24hr 9 BASE 12.92 10.531 2.830 183500.5 25yr-24hr 9 BASE 12.92 22.881 6.046 391943.1 Page 1 of 1

PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR NODE MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition Node Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.85 18.719 19.360-0.0262 29 13.45 29.991 0.00 0.000 14-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 17.85 18.719 19.360-0.0262 29 13.75 45.877 0.00 0.000 16-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.89 18.756 20.860 0.0354 57265 13.04 33.682 13.45 29.991 16-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.05 19.401 20.860 0.0241 133859 13.00 60.126 13.75 45.877 16-1A BASE 233yr-24hr 13.55 19.249 20.000 0.0171 42035 12.42 11.504 13.32 5.943 16-1A BASE 25yr-24hr 14.30 20.091 20.000 0.0236 86898 12.42 23.873 13.37 8.500 16-1B BASE 233yr-24hr 18.62 19.107 20.000 0.0395 29467 12.34 12.245 26.92 12.068 16-1B BASE 25yr-24hr 18.85 19.992 20.000 0.0395 61142 12.25 23.129 27.27 14.596 16-1C BASE 233yr-24hr 17.95 18.775 20.400 0.0181 79909 12.67 29.581 13.45 20.569 16-1C BASE 25yr-24hr 14.99 19.484 20.400 0.0235 142802 12.60 53.670 20.65 31.373 16-1D BASE 233yr-24hr 13.72 18.961 20.600 0.0162 39334 12.59 12.456 13.12 9.990 16-1D BASE 25yr-24hr 14.82 19.530 20.600 0.0135 67919 12.59 22.240 12.69 15.784 17-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 15.05 19.877 20.860-0.0103 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 17-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.05 19.877 20.860-0.0103 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 5-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 25.94 19.996 20.860 0.0051 613591 15.84 29.245 27.45 12.008 5-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.09 21.401 20.860 0.0102 2191241 14.87 83.097 31.44 14.142 5-2 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.69 20.358 21.860 0.0016 23053 0.00 0.000 33.12 0.026 5-2 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.35 21.405 21.860 0.0040 42805 0.00 0.000 30.65 1.426 5-3 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.79 20.358 21.860 0.0023 491303 13.25 12.970 30.20 0.621 5-3 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.34 21.404 21.860 0.0042 839712 13.17 28.558 48.00 3.802 5-4 BASE 233yr-24hr 26.17 20.007 21.860 0.0027 21727 30.20 0.621 31.17 0.796 5-4 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.14 21.404 21.860 0.0115 56658 48.00 3.802 31.49 7.165 5B-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 15.00 21.109 21.860 0.0044 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 5B-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.00 21.109 21.860 0.0044 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 6-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.55 21.921 22.860 0.0021 392168 13.67 8.230 17.55 4.255 6-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.12 22.010 22.860 0.0036 458137 13.59 21.609 15.12 16.337 7-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 35.00 21.520 22.360 0.0098 316986 13.34 9.292 0.00 0.000 7-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.05 21.901 22.360 0.0141 444438 13.25 23.177 19.05 6.866 8-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 39.50 21.165 21.860 0.0016 724237 13.92 12.012 0.00 0.000 8-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 23.32 21.576 21.860 0.0035 965460 13.84 31.372 23.32 10.109 9-1 BASE 233yr-24hr 32.50 21.132 21.860 0.0021 365449 12.92 10.530 0.00 0.000 9-1 BASE 25yr-24hr 18.40 21.427 21.860 0.0042 411557 12.92 22.876 18.40 4.847 Page 1 of 1

PROPOSED CONDITION ICPR LINK MAIMUM COMPARISON OUTPUT REPORT

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition Link Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report Max Time Max Max Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Flow Flow Delta Q US Stage US Stage DS Stage DS Stage hrs cfs cfs hrs ft hrs ft -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 161-141 BASE 233yr-24hr 13.45 29.991 1.959 17.89 18.756 17.85 18.719 161-141 BASE 25yr-24hr 13.75 45.877 3.163 15.05 19.401 17.85 18.719 161-171 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 17.89 18.756 15.05 19.877 161-171 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 15.05 19.401 15.05 19.877 161_141 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 17.89 18.756 17.85 18.719 161_141 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 15.05 19.401 17.85 18.719 161A-161D BASE 233yr-24hr 13.32 5.943 0.115 13.55 19.249 13.72 18.961 161A-161D BASE 25yr-24hr 13.37 8.500 0.138 14.30 20.091 14.82 19.530 161B-161C BASE 233yr-24hr 26.92 12.068-1.295 18.62 19.107 17.95 18.775 161B-161C BASE 25yr-24hr 27.27 14.596-1.295 18.85 19.992 14.99 19.484 161C-161 BASE 233yr-24hr 13.45 20.569 5.146 17.95 18.775 17.89 18.756 161C-161 BASE 25yr-24hr 20.65 31.373 5.146 14.99 19.484 15.05 19.401 161D-161C BASE 233yr-24hr 13.12 9.990 0.226 13.72 18.961 17.95 18.775 161D-161C BASE 25yr-24hr 12.69 15.784 0.342 14.82 19.530 14.99 19.484 51-161B BASE 233yr-24hr 27.45 12.008 0.500 25.94 19.996 18.62 19.107 51-161B BASE 25yr-24hr 31.44 14.142 1.109 30.09 21.401 18.85 19.992 51_161C BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 25.94 19.996 17.95 18.775 51_161C BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 30.09 21.401 14.99 19.484 52-53 BASE 233yr-24hr 33.12 0.026 0.015 26.69 20.358 26.79 20.358 52-53 BASE 25yr-24hr 30.65 1.426 0.481 30.35 21.405 30.34 21.404 52-5B1 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 26.69 20.358 15.00 21.109 52-5B1 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 30.35 21.405 15.00 21.109 53-54 BASE 233yr-24hr 30.20 0.621 0.002 26.79 20.358 26.17 20.007 53-54 BASE 25yr-24hr 48.00 3.802-0.963 30.34 21.404 30.14 21.404 54-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 31.17 0.796-0.140 26.17 20.007 25.94 19.996 54-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 31.49 7.165 4.211 30.14 21.404 30.09 21.401 61-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 17.55 4.255 0.055 17.55 21.921 25.94 19.996 61-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 15.12 16.337 0.277 15.12 22.010 30.09 21.401 71-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 35.00 21.520 25.94 19.996 71-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.05 2.289 0.050 19.05 21.901 30.09 21.401 71-81 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 35.00 21.520 39.50 21.165 71-81 BASE 25yr-24hr 19.05 4.577 0.101 19.05 21.901 23.32 21.576 Page 1 of 2

Punta Gorda Airport Construct Taxiway A Proposed Condition Link Maximum Condition ICPR Output Report 81-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 39.50 21.165 25.94 19.996 81-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 23.32 10.109 0.055 23.32 21.576 30.09 21.401 81-91 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 39.50 21.165 32.50 21.132 81-91 BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 23.32 21.576 18.40 21.427 91-51 BASE 233yr-24hr 0.00 0.000 0.000 32.50 21.132 25.94 19.996 91-51 BASE 25yr-24hr 18.40 4.847 0.066 18.40 21.427 30.09 21.401 Page 2 of 2

APPENDI D WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS

VEGETATED UPLAND BUFFER CALCULATIONS FOR OVERLAND FLOW WATER QUALITY TREATMENT

Blue Numbers Red Numbers = Input data = Answers Vegetative Upland Buffer Travel Time (sec) = 200 0.0556 hours Manning's n = 0.15 Composiitonof Vegetated Upland Buffer adjacet both sides of Taxiway P 2.33 = 4.5 in/hr Width Slope Average Slope Item S = 0.0344 ft/ft (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/ft) Factor of Safety = 2 Shoulder 20 0.05 Safety Aaea 70 0.03 0.0344 Buffer Width = 85.43 feet VEGETTIVE UPLAND BUFFER (VUB) DESIGN USING OVERLAND FLOW METHODOLOGY VUBs along the north and south sides of the propsoed Taxiway A are propsoed to treat the stormwater flowing of the proposed pavement Given: Objective: where: A proposed taxiway project in at the Punta Gorda Airport in Charlotte County, discharges to Class III waters. Sheet flow off the taxiway pavement enters the grassed shoulder where it continues to sheet flow to the proposed storm sewer collection system comprised of ditches. Maximum average land slope (S) along the proposed VUB contributing area is 3.44% (0.0344 ft/ft) (see calculation above). The poorest land cover along the proposed VUB has short Bahia grass cover. Size a VUB width and length to meet the criteria given above and using the overland flow methodology discussed herein, as summarized by the following equation. (Tt ) 1.25 ( P 2.33 ) 0.625 (S) 0.5 WB = ---------------------------------------------------- (0.002) (n) Tt = Travel time (hr) n = Manning's roughness coefficient for sheet flow WB = VUB (buffer) width (ft) in direction of sheetflow P 2.33 = 2.33-year, 24-hour rainfall depth (in), or mean annual, 24-hr. rainfall (in) S = Slope of the hydraulic grade line (average land slope) (ft/ft)

Values for the 2.33-year, 24-hour rainfall (P2.33) storm can be obtained from Figure D-2 in the Southwest Florida Water Management District, "ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING INFORMATION MANUAL, MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF SURFACE WATERS," Section B, Basis of Review. Values of Manning's roughness coefficient (n) for sheet flow can be obtained from the Table below. Table of Manning's Roughness Coefficients (n) for Sheet Flow (+0.1 ft. depth) Surface Description Smooth surface (bare soil) Short grass Dense grass Dense and tall grass Range land Woods with Light underbrush Woods with Dense underbrush Source: Soil Conservation Service (1986) Design Calculations: Calculate the VUB width (WB). a. Set the travel time to (Tt) = 200 sec, since the project discharges to Class III waters. Converting the time to hours gives: (Tt) = 200 sec (1 hour/3600 sec) = 0.0556 hr. b. The rainfall depth for the mean annual storm (P 2.33) for Polk County = 4.5 in, from Basis of Review, Figure D-2. c. Slope (S) = 3.44% = 0.0344 ft/ft. (see calcuation above) d. Manning's roughness coefficient (n) for mowed Bahaia grass = 0.15 (from Table 3-1). e. A safety factor of two (0.5) will be used, as the VUB is not likely to be accessible to the public or other land uses. f. The VUB width (WB) can be determined using equation 3-2: (n) 0.011 0.15 0.24 0.41 0.13 0.4 0.8 (0.0556 ) 1.25 (4.5 ) 0.625 (0.0344) 0.5 (WB) = ----------------------------------------------------------- = 85.43 ft. (0.5SF) (0.002) (0.15) (WB) = 85.43 ft. ROUNDED up to = 90 ft.

Conclusion: A VUB width of 90 feet or greater, measured up from the taxiway edge of pavement to the toe of slope for the adjacent swale shall be constructed along the north and south sides of the propsoed taxiway.

APPENDI F FLOODPLAIN MAP

Project Location 1

APPENDI E RAINFALL DATA

APPENDI G TAILWATER DATA

19.86-1.14' = 18.72' 2 1 21.02'-1.14' = 19.88' 4 5 3 6

22.25'-1.14' = 21.11' 1 2