Design of buildings using EC8

Similar documents
Design of buildings using EC8 Configuration of the structural system

Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

EARTHQUAKE LATERAL FORCE ANALYSIS. Dr. Jagadish. G. Kori Professor & Head Civil Engineering Department Govt. Engineering College, Haveri

0306 SEISMIC LOADS GENERAL

Comparitive Study of Different Seismic Analysis in Case of Pounding

Modelling and Analysis of Irregular Geometrical Configured RCC Multi- Storey Building Using Shear Wall

Modal-spectral analysis of a gas storage tank.

Chapter 13 SEISMICALLY ISOLATED STRUCTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

STUDY ON TORSIONAL RESPONSE OF TALL BUILDING STRUCTURES WITH TRANSFER LAYER UNDER SEISMIC ACTION

Comparative Study on Dynamic Analysis of Irregular Building with Shear Walls

RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS OF MULTI- STOREY BUILDING WITH FLOATING COLUMNS

Design check of BRBF system according to Eurocode 8 Use of pushover analysis

Behaviour Analysis of High Rise Irregular Structure with Change in Orientation of Columns

Application of Performance Based Nonlinear. of RC Buildings. A.Q. Bhatti National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

Comparative Study of Pushover Analysis on RCC Structures

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF R.C. DUAL FRAME SYSTEMS WITH AND WITHOUT FLOATING COLUMNS

Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System with Conventional Slab System

STUDYING THE EFFECT OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION ANGLE ON THE INTERNAL FORCES OF STEEL BUILDING S ELEMENTS BY USING NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSES

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A MULTISTORY BUILDING BY RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD AND SEISMIC COEFFICIENT METHOD

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON STRUCTURAL REGULARITY

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Seismic Evaluation of Existing I.I.T. Kanpur Library Building and its Strengthening with Proposed Extension

2C09 Design for seismic and climate change

MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RC FRAME BUILDING WITH STAIRCASE AND ELEVATOR CORE

Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of Republic of Turkey. Specification for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Zones (2007) 53-3

distribution to different levels along the height of the building and to various lateral load resisting elements for the following buildings:

COMPARATIVE REPORT CYPECAD VS. ETABS

EFFECT OF SHEAR WALL POSITION IN MULTI-STORIED BUILDING

Effect of Diaphragm Openings in Multi-storeyed RC framed buildings using Pushover analysis

ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF TUBE-IN-TUBE STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

Structural Design of Super High Rise Buildings in High Seismic Intensity Area

THE EFFECTS OF THE TYPE OF SLAB ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN THE MULTI-STOREY REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

TIME HISTORY RESPONSE PREDICTION FOR MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS UNDER EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Torsional and Seismic Behavior of Shear Wall Dominant Flat Plate Buildings

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Seismic Analysis of a Multistoried Building

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF IRREGULAR STEEL STRUCTURES IN PLAN WITH BRB AND EBF BRACES UNDER NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKE

Comparison between Seismic Behavior of Suspended Zipper Braced Frames and Various EBF Systems

Seismic Analysis of Steel Frames with Different Bracings using ETSBS Software.

Division IV EARTHQUAKE DESIGN

Classical soil-structure interaction and the New Zealand structural design actions standard NZS (2004)

Static and dynamic simulation in the seismic behavior of a building structure using ANSYS program

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

The Influence of Change in Basement Floors Stiffness on the Earthquake Force Distribution across the Height of Concrete Moment Frames

A new approach for the Seismic Isolation Methods for Ancient Statues Displayed in Base Isolated Museums

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (SEISMIC PROVISIONS) FOR EXISTING BUILDING CONVERTED TO JOINT LIVING AND WORK QUARTERS

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DIAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN HIGH RISE STEEL BUILDINGS

Base isolation. Philippe Bisch IOSIS, EGIS group. EUROCODE 8 Background and Applications

EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF 16 TH STOREY RC BUILDING

Study of Shear Walls in Different Locations of Multistoried Building with Uniform Thickness in Seismic Zone III

Earthquake Behavior of RCC Building for Various Shear Wall Configurations

SEISMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURE

Seismic Analysis of RC Shear Wall Frame Buildings with and Without Openings in Shear Wall

2.15 Tokamak Seismic Analysis

Efficient seismic analysis of high-rise buildings considering the basements

Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Multi-Storey R/C Buildings With and Without Internal Beams

Pushover Analysis of RC Bare Frame: Performance Comparison between Ductile and Non-ductile detailing

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Seismic Behaviour of Multi-Storied RCMRF Buildings Resting on Sloping Ground

Seismic Isolation with Friction Pendulum System. Nuno Miguel Canhão Esteves

Department of Civil Engineering, SKP Engg. College, Tiruvanamalai, TN, India

Analysis of a Multi-Tower Frame Structure connected at different levels using ETABS

BASIC METHODS OF ANALYSIS FOR BRIDGES

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF MULTISTORY BUILDINGS DESIGNED ACCORDING TO EGYPTIAN CODE

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND CONCRETE WITH MASONRY INFILL BUILDINGS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF SUPER TALL BUILDINGS

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE

Seismic analysis of flat slab and wide beam system

THE EXTENDED N2 METHOD IN SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL FRAMES CONSIDERING SEMI-RIGID JOINTS

PREDICTION OF SEISMIC TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN TALL SYMMETRIC BUILDINGS

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR THE RC STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITY

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND CONCRETE WITH MASONRY INFILL BUILDINGS

Response Analysis of an RC Cooling Tower Under Seismic and Windstorm Effects D. Makovička

Critical comparison of design procedures and analysis methods for base isolated buildings

Analysis of Fundamental Natural Period of Irregular Rcc Framed Structure

NON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS

Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings with Columns of Different Heights within One Storey

University of Naples Federico II School of Engineering. 2 years Master in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering

Earthquake Resistant Design for Low Rise Open Ground Storey Famed Building

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BUILDING USING TWO TYPES OF PASSIVE ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES

Effect of Column Discontinuity on Base Shear and Displacement of Structure

3. Analysis Procedures

Seismic Assessment and Retrofitting of an S Shape Building with Expansion Joints.

Analysis of G+7 Multistoried Building for Various Locations of Shear Wall Considering the Effect of Torsion Using Response Spectrum Method

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

AN EXAMINATION OF DAMAGES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSOLED BUILDINGS IN TURKEY DUE TO 17 AUGUST 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE

Inelastic Torsional Response of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames

STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES OF POWER PLANTS IN HIGH SEISMIC AREAS

PG Student, Civil Engineering Department, Saraswati College of Engineering, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India

Seismic Analysis of Buildings with Shear Wall having Horizontal Irregularity

Performance of RC Elevated Water Tank for different Bracing Patterns under the effect of Earthquake Excitation

Seismic analysis of vertically geometric irregular structures

Seismic Analysis of Multi-StoreyBuildingwithPlus ShapeRCShear Wallsat The CenterinConcrete Frame Structure WithDifferentType of SoilCondition

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development SEISMIC ANALYSIS ON BUILDING WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES


SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL

Consideration of torsional irregularity in Modal Response Spectrum Analysis

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 10, October ISSN

Transcription:

Design of buildings using EC8 & 1 can be applied to all buildings and is obligatory for buildings which do not satisfy the regularity criteria specified by EC8. The response of all modes of vibration contributing significantly to the global response shall be taken into account. This may be satisfied by either of the following: By demonstrating that the sum of the effective modal masses for the modes taken into account amounts to at least 90% of the total mass of the structure. By demonstrating that all modes with effective modal masses greater than 5% of the total mass are considered. Of course, if possible, all modes can be taken into account 2 1

A six storey 2D frame is a 6DOF system (6 modes) The sum of the effective modal masses for the first two modes amounts for more than 90% of the total mass of the structure Only the first two modes effective masses are greater than 5% of the total mass Therefore only the first two modes can be take into account 3 1 st mode 2 nd mode 3 rd mode 4 th mode 5 th mode 6 th mode Only the first two (or three) modes are important for the vibration of this structure. EC8 permits us to ignore the rest of them. 4 2

When using a spatial model, the above conditions have to be verified for each relevant direction. A six storey 3D building is a 18DOF system The first 5 modes should be taken into account to amount for more than 90% of the total mass of the structure for both directions 5 The response in two vibration modes i and j (including both translational and torsional modes) may be considered as independent of each other, if their periods T i and T j satisfy (with T j T i ) the following condition: T j 0,9 T i (1) Whenever all relevant modal responses may be regarded as independent of each other, the maximum value E E of a seismic action effect may be taken as: Combination of modal responses (SRSS rule) (2) E E seismic action effect under consideration (force, displacement, etc.) E Ei value of this seismic action effect due to the vibration mode i. If (1) is not satisfied, more accurate procedures for the combination of the modal maxima shall be adopted such as the "Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC rule) 6 3

General This type of analysis may be applied to buildings whose response is not significantly affected by contributions from higher modes of vibration. These requirements are deemed to be satisfied in buildings which fulfill the two following conditions: a) they have fundamental periods of vibration T1 in the two main directions smaller than the following values b) they meet the criteria for regularity in elevation 7 Base shear force The seismic base shear force F b is a very important quantity in earthquake engineering. The base shear force value is the summary of the shear forces of all vertical elements at the ground floor level when a lateral loading (usually seismic loading) is applied to the structure Lateral loading Shear force diagram 8 4

Base shear force The seismic base shear force F b, for each horizontal direction in which the building is analyzed, is determined as follows: F b = S d (T 1 ) m λ S d (T 1 ) ordinate of the design spectrum (see 3.2.2.5) at period T1 T 1 m λ fundamental period of vibration of the building for lateral motion in the direction considered total mass of the building, above the foundation or above the top of a rigid basement correction factor, the value of which is equal to λ = 0,85 if T 1 < 2 T C and the building has more than two storeys, or λ = 1,0 otherwise. 9 Distribution of the horizontal seismic forces The fundamental mode shapes in the horizontal directions of analysis of the building may be calculated using methods of structural dynamics (usually this is done automatically by programs like SAP2000) or may be approximated by horizontal displacements increasing linearly along the height of the building. The seismic action effects shall be determined by applying, to the two planar models, horizontal forces F i to all storeys. F i horizontal force acting on storey i F b seismic base shear s i, s j displacements of masses m i, m j in the fundamental mode shape When the fundamental mode shape is approximated by horizontal displacements increasing linearly along the height, the horizontal forces F i are given by: z i, z j heights of the masses m i, m j above the level of application of the seismic action 10 (foundation or top of a rigid basement). 5

Combination of the effects of the components of the seismic action Horizontal components of the seismic action In general the horizontal components of the seismic action shall be considered as acting simultaneously. The combination of the horizontal components of the seismic action may be accounted for as follows: a) The structural response to each component shall be evaluated separately, using the combination rules for modal responses as above b) The maximum value of each action effect on the structure due to the two horizontal components of the seismic action may then be estimated by the square root of the sum of the squared values of the action effect due to each horizontal component. 11 Combination of the effects of the components of the seismic action Horizontal components of the seismic action As an alternative to the previous combination rule the action effects due to the combination of the horizontal components of the seismic action may be computed using both of the two following combinations: 1) E Edx "+" 0,30E Edy 2) 0,30E Edx "+" E Edy "+" implies "to be combined with'' E Edx E Edy action effects due to the application of the seismic action along the chosen horizontal axis x of the structure action effects due to the application of the same seismic action along the orthogonal horizontal axis y of the structure. 12 6