Economic implications of land degradation on sustainability and food security in India

Similar documents
ARE DISPARITIES IN INDIAN AGRICULTURE GROWING?

Progress and Potential of Horticulture in India

Forest Cover and Forest Area

Inter-Linkages Among Agricultural Research Investment, Agricultural Productivity and Rural Poverty in India

Rice Production and Nutrient Management in India

REGIONAL CONVERGENCE IN AGRICULTURE GROWTH IN INDIA: A STATE LEVEL ANALYSIS

DEMAND FOR FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN INDIA

Soil Health Management in India

PRODUCTIVITY STATUS OF RICE DURING NINTH PLAN

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MARGINAL FARMS IN INDIA VIS-A-VIS WEST BENGAL DURING LAST DECADE

1 What are three cropping seasons of India? Explain any one in brief. 2 Discuss three main impacts of globalization on Indian agriculture.

Regional Pattern of Agricultural Growth and Rural Employment in India: Have Small Farmers Benefitted?

DEPENDENCE ON AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT: A REGIONAL ANALYSIS. Bal Krishan Research Scholar Centre for study of regional development, JNU, New Delhi

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 70 TO BE ANSWERED ON

Growth and Inclusion: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives

SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE

Comparative Study of Marginal Farms in India vis-a-vis West Bengal; Evidences from Last Decade

has taken place in western and south-western states, whereas crop specialization has occurred

Status, Quality and Management of Groundwater in India

GENERAL CROP ESTIMATION SURVEY (GCES)

Status of Poverty in India A State wise Analysis

Dynamics of Land Use Competition in India: Perceptions and Realities. Vijay Paul Sharma

IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE AREA, PRODUCTION AND YIELD OF THE FOODGRAINS IN INDIA

India s Growth and Poverty Reduction Experience: Facts and Conjectures. Timothy Besley, LSE

OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE OF RURAL FEMALES IN INDIA AFTER GLOBALIZATION. Simta Rani. Abstract

At a Glance. Area under wheat cultivation is on higher side compared to last year.

Output and Employment Growth in Registered Manufacturing Industries in India: Testing Kaldor s Hypothesis

International Journal of Advance ISSN and Applied Research (IJAAR) Impact Factor 0.899

National Vegetable Initiative for Urban Clusters. Value chain integration, technology dissemination and accessing investments and markets

DISTRIBUTION OF CROPS AND THEIR REQUIREMENT

Operational Land Holdings in India: Trend and Inequality Analysis ( )

SUBJECT: MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CROP WEATHER WATCH GROUP HELD ON

Behaviour of Market Arrivals and Prices of Selected Vegetable Crops: A Study of Four Metropolitan Markets

PROGRAMMES AND SCHEMES Monsoon and Crop Sowing Situation during Kharif-2012

Farmer Suicides in India: Levels and Trends across Major States,

AGRICULTURE SHORT ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS [3 MARKS]

Public Expenditures and Subsidies in Indian Surface Irrigation: Who Benefits?

Trends of Non-Foodgrains Cultivation in India: A State Level Analysis

6. LAND RESOURCES : AGRICULTURE

MEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI REFERENCE NOTE. No.56/RN/Ref./Nov/2017

SUBJECT: MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CROP WEATHER WATCH GROUP HELD ON

Fertiliser Growth, Imbalances and Subsidies: Trends and Implications

Solar pumps for sustainable irrigation Supporting policymakers and enterprises to scale adoption and ensure sustainable use

22: List of Studies Conducted by Agro-Economic Research Centres

India. India Grain Voluntary Update - October 2017

Guidelines for Implementation of fisheries Scheme under the National Mission for Protein Supplements (NMPS) in States during

SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA: A CASE STUDY OF UTTAR PRADESH ABSTRACT

Demand for Fertilisers in India: Determinants and Outlook for 2020

Chapter 2 Coverage, Sampling Design and Methodology

MAHESH TUTORIALS. Paper - 6. Test - III S.S.C. Batch : SB Marks : 30 GEOGRAPHY Chapter : 4,5,6,7,8,9,12

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of NEEA held at Dibrugarh, Assam in February POVERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION IN RURAL INDIA: A NEXUS

Farmers Suicides In India

Fertiliser Growth, Imbalances and Subsidies : Trends and Implications

(Paragraphs 8:S' to 8.11)

CHAPTER 2 FOREST COVER

State wise analysis of RPO Regulation for Captive users

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO.2282 TO BE ANSWERED ON

Volume -1, Issue-4 (October-December), 2013 Available online at popularkheti.info. Organic Farming: Current Status in India

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE. LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION No. 334 TO BE ANSWERED ON

Estimation of agricultural resource inequality in India using Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient approach

OneCert Asia: Company Profile

International Journal of Commerce and Business Management. Volume 5 Issue 2 October,

Manpower in Mining Some Reflections

INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. Page 1

Changing Agrarian Relationships in Rural India

From Rooftops to Farmtops. Augmenting India s Distributed Solar Goals through net-metered solar pumps

SUBJECT: MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CROP WEATHER WATCH GROUP HELD ON

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ANNALS OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES ( )

COTTON unfazed by synthetics

Growth Rates and Decomposition Analysis of Onion Production in Rajasthan State of India

Need Additional Information? LEGAL DISCLAIMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

CHAPTER - Ill GROWTH PERFORMANCE, INSTABILITY, ACREAGE AND YIELD RESPONSE OF PULSE CROPS

GIS STUDY OF THE DIVERSITY OF GINGER CULTIVATION IN INDIA Utpala P, Johny A.K, V.A.Parthasarathy, K.Jayarajan and M.S.Madan

Comparative economics of Banana cultivation in Anand district of Gujarat

Achieving self sufficiency in pulse production in India

Content. Monsoon Report and Sowing Update. Highlights. Southwest Monsoon: A flashback of Southwest Monsoon A slow beginning

Confederation of Indian Industry. Opportunities in ORGANIC. Food in India. Ministry of Food Processing Industries. Government of India

India s Positioning in the Global Fertilizer Industry

Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought in India

Valuation of groundwater protection: A state level analysis in India

Externally Aided Projects

Page 1 of 6. Agriculture. I. Answer the Following

IMPO P RT R AN A C N E C E O F G RO R UN U D N W

Safe Water Network is recognized as a National Key Resource Center by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation KNOWLEDGE PARTNER GRANT PARTNER

Agrarian Stagnation in Eastern Gangetic Plains. Avinash Kishore IFPRI, New Delhi

Trends and Patterns of Urbanization in India: A State Level Analysis

HIGH DENSITY PLANTING - A TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY

Facts of PAT Cycle 1 & 2. A Bicon Consultants Report. Bicon Report 12/30/16 Energy Knowledge Hub

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 12 : 5 May 2012 ISSN

CENTRAL BUDGET AND FARMERS SUICIDE IN INDIA

Production and Productivity of Pulses in India: Role of Combined Quality Inputs Usage

Groundwater Resource Assessment in India-Some Emerging Issues

SCENARIO OF GOAT SECTOR: MAHARASHTRA STATE (INDIA)

COST OF CULTIVATION AND DISPOSAL PATTERN OF TOMATO IN RAIPUR DISTRICT OF CHHATTISGARH, INDIA

SMALL HYDRO PROGRAMME IN INDIA

Group company wise GSM cell sub figures - Mar'2011 ALL INDIA GSM SUBSCRIBER FIGURES FOR MARCH A' Circle TN Aircel Ltd

Producer s Share in Consumer Rupee in the Marketing of Banana, Theni District. V. Saravanapandeeswari 1 * and Dr. B. Vanitha 2.

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Changeministry of. Government of India Environment & Forests Government of India

ALL INDIA GSM SUBCRIBER FIGURES FOR JANUARY 2011

Workshop on The NCAER 2018 State Investment Potential Index N-SIPI 2018

Transcription:

Agropedology 23, 13(2), 19-27 Economic implications of land degradation on sustainability and food security in India A. K. VASISHT, R. P. SINGH AND V. C. MATHUR Division of Agricultural Economics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi - 1 IO 12, India. Abstract : The estimates of land degradation by different agencies vary between 53 and 188 million hectares in the country. Widely accepted estimates indicate, however, that nearly 57 per cent of the geographical area or 187.8 million hectares of land are degraded of different intensity. Water erosion covers larger area than the degradation caused by other factors. If land degradation is translated in terms of economic losses, the country looses Rs. 285.51 billion annually at current prices and Rs.89.38 billion at 1979-82 prices, which is worked out to be around 12 per cent of the total value of agricultural output in the country. The economic losses varied between 1 to 27 per cent of the value of agricultural output due to nature and severity of degradation of land and the cropping pattern across the states. Additional key words: Sustainability, degradation, sensitivity analysis. Introduction India's agricultural and rural development policies have underlined the need for achieving self-sufficiency and food security for the people. Beginning with the seed - fertilizer revolution that began in the late sixties, supported by appropriate agricultural development policies, the country attained a significant and steady growth in agricultural output. However, agriculture in India is currently facing a new set of challenges. Further enhancement of yield levels and sustainable use of natural resources are the two major issues that need to be tackled. Declining soil fertility and an increase in proportion of land becoming unfit for cultivation are major issues that question the sustainability. There are wide differences between the estimates provided by different authors/ agencies. Moreover, these estimates are confined only to physical units of land degradation. It is more important to estimate the extent of economic losses to the coun-

2 Economic implication of land degradation Table 1. Agencies Estimates of degraded land in India* Estimated degraded land (mba.) % oftga National Commission on Agriculture. Gov!. of India. (1976) Department of Environment, Government of India, (Vohra, 198) Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development, (1984) National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, (1985) National Wasteland Development Board, Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi, (1985) Soil and Water Conservation Division, Ministry of Agriculture, (199 J) National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, (1994) Abrol & Sehgal (1994), GLASOD Mapping 175. 95. 93.7 53.3 123. 173.6 166. 187.7 53.24 28.9 28.5 16.21 37.5 52.81 5.5 45.9 mates of economic losses can be arrived at. Reconciled information on the extent of land degradation due to various causal factors was used (Sehgal and Abrol 1994). Based on the information on the extent of land degradation provided for other States by NBSS&LUP (Table 2), the economic losses due to different types of land degra- dation were estimated using the model de veloped for the purpose. The model is esti mated by multiplying the per hectare total try on account of land degradation. Such estimates of economic losses will help us to gauge the severity of the problem, besides highlighting the imperative need to initiate measures for rec1amationof the degraded land. The present study is an attempt to assess the economic losses on account of land degradation. A state level analysis will help to identify the areas that have a severe problem and which require attention and intervention to reverse the situation. Materials and methods The available statistics on degraded lands from different sources (Table 1) indicate wide variation and hence it is important to have realistic estimates of the physical area under degraded lands before esti- value of output by the extent of degraded land in each district. The economic losses due to different types of degradation have been categorized as slight, moderate and severe on the basis of available literature and discussions with subject matter specialists. Under the slight,,

A. K. Vasisht et al. 21 Table 2. Extent of land degradation in India and its states States "Total geographical "Net sown area "Degraded land Degraded land as % area (' hal (' hal area ('. hal of total geographical area Andhra Pradesh 2755 1736 15662 57 Assam 7844 2762 287 36 Bihar 17388 7329 6291 36 Gujarat 1962 965 1336 53 Himachal Pradesh 5567 563 38 54 Haryana 4421 361 1384 31 Jammu & Kashmir 22224 734 2225 1 Karnataka 19179 1515 7681 4 Kerala 3886 2267 268 67 Maharashtra 3771 17894 13328 43 Madhya Pradesh 44345 19773 2629 59 Orissa 15571 689 6121 39 Rajasthan 34224 16683 13586 4 Tamil Nadu 136 5414 5273 41 Uttar Pradesh 29441 17437 15253 52 West Bengal 8875 5463 2752 31 Punjab 536 4139 896 18 All India 328726 14282 1877 57 "Statistical Abstract of Haryana (1997-98), Government of Haryana, (1999) "'NBSS & LUP (lear), Nagpur, (2) category, the extent of losses due to different causal factors range from 4 to 6 per cent and thus an average value of 5 per cent of the degraded land has been taken for this category. The average value under the moderate category has been taken as 12 per cent, the range of moderate and moderately severe being 12 to 15 per cent. Similarly, the average value under severe category has been taken as 37 per cent, it being the average of the range 25 to 5 per cent of severe and very severe category. In the case of water-logging / flooding and ravines, an average loss of 5 per cent was assumed to estimate economic losses. Estimation model The model proposed uses the extent of the degraded land in each district (estimated by National Remote Sensing Services) which is multiplied with the per hectare total value of output (standardized by district average yields and farm harvest prices of crops) to yield the economic losses on account of land degradation (El.) ELn = LLL X d1k * [ (LY ik * P ik )/ N. k ] Where, Y ik i th P ik i'h d I k I denotes the quantity of output of crop in the kth district, denotes the farm harvest price of crop in the k'h district,

22 Economic implication of land degradation Nak X d1k denotes net sown area in k'h district, denotes area under d'h category of degraded land and l'h group of losses in the k th district Alternative scenarios The extent of degradation of land may get reduced over time due to various reclamation measures being adopted by the Government. Also, the extent of land degradation might increase over time due to overexploitation of natural resources and agricultural development. To capture these effects of reduced or increased degradation of land, sensitivity analysis was performed and economic losses were estimated for two alternative scenarios of 1 per cent lower extent of degradation and 1 per cent higher extent of degradation. Data The reconciled data on the extent of degradation due to various causal factors for different States were made available by the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning Nagpur. For the coun try as a whole, the estimates of Abrol and Sehgal (1994) are used in the study. In order to assess the economic losses, statewise data on area and production of different crops, vegetables and fruits for the years 1994-95 and 1995-96 and the farm harvest prices for the major states were collected and the value of output for different commodities were computed to find the total value of productivity per unit of land, which indicated considerable variation between states, both at current and constant prices. indicating that the level and magnitude of land degradation varies with the variation in total value productivity across states. Thus, the economic losses are varying considerably on account of both the factors across the States. Results and discussion The state-wise value productivity at current and constant prices is presented in table 3. There are wide variations in the productivity levels across states as revealed by the coefficient of variation (58 per cl!nt). These variations in the productivity levels are on account of the differences in cropping patterns and yield levels across the states and will ultimately be reflected in the magnitude of economic losses. The data indicate that the value productivity per hectare at current prices (average of 1994-96 prices), for the country is Rs. 12288. It is the highest in case of Punjab (Rs. 33422 per ha) followed by West Bengal (Rs. 32397 per ha) and Haryana (Rs. 25648 per ha). The lowest value productivity was observed in case of Madhya Pradesh (Rs. 6433 per ha). The picture is more or less similar at constant prices (base: 1979-8 to 1981-82). The estimated economic losses (Table 4) resulting from various sources of land degradation in the country at the current level of total land degradation work out to around Rs. 285.51 billion at current prices. The severity of the economic loss is the highest in Andhra Pradesh followed by Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat. The economic loss is the least in Punjab state. The estimates of economic losses re-

A. K. Vasisht et al. 23 Table 3. State wise total value productivity of Indian agriculture (at Farm Harvest Prices) Districts Current Prices Constant Prices (1995 97) (Base:1979-8 to 1981-82) Andhra Pradesh Assam Bihar Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Haryana Jammu & Kashmir Karnataka Kerala Maharashtra Madhya Pradesh Orissa Rajasthan Tamilnadu Uttar Pradesh West Bengal Punjab All India CV(%) Productivity (Rslha.) 1465 1371 11571 13811 12597 25648 13196 9674 662 6524. 6432 8169 7597 13521 17346 32397 33421 12287 58.17 Productivity (Rslha.) 4324 3661 3436 4588 45 8781 4264 377 1513 282 2122 2389 2686 4153 5377 8411 1183 3846 58.69 *Based on the output and farm harvest prices of crops, vegetables and fruits grown in the states suiting from various sources of land degradation at constant (1979-82) prices reveals that at the current levels of degradation, the economic losses in the country as a whole are of the order of Rs. 89.38 billion. In per hectare terms, the economic loss due to land degradation in the country is Rs 1521 at current prices and Rs 476 at constant prices. For the country as a whole, the overall losses at current prices and under current degradation rates are around 12 per cent of the total value product. The proportion of losses to total value product of the states vary between' 1 to 27 per cent. The magnitudes of economic losses are quite severe in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kamataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. These States together account for nearly 73 per cent of the total losses in the country due to land degradation. Economic losses were also computed under alternative scenarios of 1 per cent

I Table 4. Economic losses due to land degradation in India and its States. At current prices (1995-97) At constant prices (1979-82) Losses as percent *Degraded land States area (' hal Total losses Per ha. losses Total losses Per ha. losses to total value (Rs. billion) (Rs. /hal (Rs. Billion) (Rs. /hal productivity tv """ Andhra Pradesh 15662 43.1 2752 13.25 846 2 Assam 287 9.31 3318 2.61 929 25 Bihar 6291 1.22 1625 3.4 483 14 Gujarat 1336 31.99 395 1.63 128 22 Himachal Pradesh 38 1.19 3388 3.28 19 27 Haryana 1384 5.248 3783 1.79 1295 15 Jaromu & Kashmir 2225 4.86 2186 1.57 76 17 Karnataka 7681 13.59 177 4.32 563 18 Kerala 268 4.9 1568.94 36 24 Maharashtra 13328 18.92 1419 6.4 453 22 ttl t:i Madhya Pradesh 2629 33.37 1273 11.1 42 2 Orissa 6121 9.26 1513 2.71 443 19 e. Rajasthan 13586 17.6 1295 6.22 458 17 ~. Tamil Nadu 5273 14.79 285 4.54 862 21 -~. I'l Uttar Pradesh 15253 33.66 227 1.43 684 13 t:1. t:i West Bengal 2752 8.48 381 2.2 8 1..., Punjab 896 4.84 541 1.71 197 19 g- Ail India-- 1877 285.51 1521 89.38 476 12 NBSS & LUP (lear), Nagpur, (2) ** Based on latest estimate by Sehgal and Ahrol, (1994).... (1).., (JQ I'l.. ~. t:i

.. -I Table 5. Economic losses due to land degradation in India under alternative scenarios?> ~ State At current prices (Rs billion) At constant prices (Rs billion) <: Current Scenario 'Scenario I "Scenario II Current Scenario 'Scenario I * * Scenario II... Andhra Pradesh 43.1 47.41 38.79 13.25 14.58 11.93 <I> Assam 9.31 1.24 8.38 2.61 2.87 2.35 Bihar 1.22 11.24 9.2 3.3 3.34 2.73 Gujarat 31.99 35.19 28.79 1.63 11.69 9.56 Haryana 5.24 5.76 4.71 1.79 1.97 1.61 Himachal Pradesh IOJ9 11.21 9.17 3.28 3.6 2.95 Jammu & Kashmir 4.86 5.35 4.38 1.57 1.73 1.41 Karnataka 13.59 14.95 12.23 4.32 4.76 3.89 Kerala 4.9 4.5 3.68.94 1.3.84 Madhya Pradesh 33.37 36.7 3.3 11.1 12.11 9.91 Maharashtra 18.92 2.81 17.2 6.4 6.64 5,43 Orissa' 9.26 1.19 8.34 2.71 2.98 2.44 Punjab 5.76 6.34 5.19 1.91 2.1 1.72 Rajasthan 17.6 19.36 15.85 6.22 6.84 5.6 Tamil Nadu 14.79 16.23 13.31 4.54 5 4.9 Uttar Pradesh 33.66 37.2 3.29 1,43 11.48 9.39 West Bengal 8,48 9.33 7.63 2.2 2.42 1.98 India 285.51 314.6 256.96 89.38 98.31 8.44 'Scenario I : Higher economic losses by 1% due to anticipated growth in agriculture and farm harvest prices Scenario II : Lower economic losses by 1% due to anticipated reclamation of degraded /and po en en... ::r... I:l ~ tv VI

26 Economic implication of land degradation higher degradation extent (Scenario I) and 1 per cent lower extent of degradation (Scenario II). Under Scenario I. the total economic losses in the country are estimated at nearly Rs. 314.6 billion, whereas under Scenario II, the economic losses reduced to approximately Rs. 256.96 billion at current prices (Table 5). The corresponding estimates under the two alternative scenarios at constant prices are approximately Rs. 98.31 billion and Rs. 8.44 billion, respectively. Conclusion Of the 17 States included in the study. 15 States had over one-third of area degraded due to one or more of the causal factors. Translated in terms of economic losses, the country looses Rs.285.51 billion at current prices and Rs.89.38 billion at 1979-82 prices. Although these estimates are based on reconciled figures of degraded land, alternative scenarios with 1 per cem higher degradation and 1 per cent lower degradation. At current prices, the corresponding economic losses under these two scenarios work out to Rs. 314.6 and Rs. 256.96 billion, respectively, while at 198-82 prices the losses are of the order of Rs. 98.31 and Rs. 8.44 billion, respectively. The economic losses at current estimates of degraded land are around 12 per cent of the total value of agricultural output in the country. The economic losses range between 1 to 27 per cent of the value of agricultural output in the states. Differences in the severity of degradation of land due to different causal factors and the cropping pattern in the district account for the variation in the magnitude of economic losses between States. The alarming rate of degradation associated with high economic loss call for suitable policies relating to the use of water and other purchased inputs in agriculture. Inclusion of agro-forestry, agro horticulture etc. would be the better proposition. At the same time, concerted and wellfocused reclamation measures, must be implemented to conserve land and there by to reduce the economic losses and ensure sustainability of Indian agriculture. Acknowledgement We acknowledge the Expert Group Committee, especially Dr. M. Velayutham, Ex. Director, NBSS&LUP, Nagpur, constituted by the Director General, rcar, New Delhi, to examine the extent and magnitude of land degradation in India for providing reconciled data on land degradation for the districts of Punjab. The assistance and technical support provided by Shri Rajesh Kumar, SRF, in the preparation of this paper is gratefully acknowledged. References Sehgal, J.L. and Abrol, I.P. (1994). Soil Degradation in India- Status and Impact. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi NBSS & LUP. (2). Report on Soil Degradation Status of Punjab State. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, New Delhi

A. K. Vasisht et al. 27 Sehgal, J. L., Sharma P. K., Sidhu G. S. and Abroll. P. (1986). Land degradation and land use changes in irrigated areas of Punjab, India. Trans. XIII Intern. Soc. Soil Science Congress, Hamburg, West Germany. Singh, S.P., Walia., C.S., Dhankar, R.P. (2). Land Resource Base of the Northern Region. Symposium on perspectives and policies for land use planning. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, India. p.12-19 Received: February 23; Accepted: August, 23