EA MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT Facilitating cross border trade with reliable goods and services

Similar documents
ACCREDITATION A TOOL TO SUPPORT REGULATORS

ACCREDITATION A TOOL TO SUPPORT REGULATORS

ACCREDITATION A TOOL TO SUPPORT REGULATORS

Delivering a safer world

Conformity Assessment Facilitates Trades Development

EA Procedure and Criteria for the Evaluation of Conformity Assessment Schemes by EA Accreditation Body Members

EA Procedure and Criteria. For the Evaluation of Conformity. Assessment Schemes by EA. Accreditation Body Members

Standards and accreditation. Tools for delivering better regulation

ROLE OF THE APEC SPECIALIST REGIONAL BODIES ELEMENTS OF THE STANDARDS AND CONFORMANCE INFRASTRUCTURE

Joint EA - EDQM Communication regarding cooperation when carrying out (joint) audits/assessments in Official Medicines Control Laboratories

Standards and accreditation. Tools for policy makers and regulators

Ensuring Food Safety. Through Accredited Third-Party Conformity Assessment. An ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board White Paper

ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement: Policy and Management ILAC-P4:06/2017

THE QUALITY INSTITUTIONS An enabling framework for international trade. Tom Rotherham International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)

IAF MLA Document. Guidance for the Exchange of Documentation among MLA Signatories for the Assessment of Conformity Assessment Bodies.

Regulation for Scheme Owners requesting acceptance by ACCREDIA of new Conformity Assessment Schemes and their revisions

Title Procedure for setting up the accreditation of new conformity assessment schemes

EA-2/02 EA Procedure for the evaluation of a National Accreditation Body. EA Procedure. for the evaluation. of a National Accreditation Body

TWINNING PROJECT FICHE

IAF Mandatory Document. Accreditation Assessment of Conformity Assessment Bodies with Activities in Multiple Countries. Issue 2 IAF MD 12:2016

CONTENTS. 8 - MLA monitoring and improvement of activities Annex 1 - Full Member signatories to the EA MLA... 23

EA-7/04 Legal Compliance as a part of accredited ISO 14001: 2004 certification

La Société Nationale de Certification et d Homologation

List of Conclusions and Resolutions agreed at the 33 rd Meeting of the EA Advisory Board held on 22 October 2014

Position Statement. Product compliance and evidence of suitability

Quick Guide: Independent Verification in TCO Certified

Voluntary Standards for achieving Excellence in Food Safety and Quality. in Food Exports

OIML B 15 BASIC PUBLICATION. Edition 2006 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

PEFC contribution to the review. of the EU Timber Regulation

Version 2 November Code of Practice. Consignment Based Conformity Assessment (CBCA) Services

The value of UKAS accreditation. For organisations with stable scopes in established technical sectors. Survey Report

Dutch Accreditation Council (RvA) Explanatory notes on EN-ISO/IEC 17025

EURAMET and the Operation of NMIs. EURAMET Guide No. 1 Version 2.0 (01/2015)

IAF Mandatory Document

Supplement 1 to EA-2/13 EA Cross Border Accreditation Policy and Procedure for Cross Border Cooperation between EA Members

European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance (2010/2085(INI))

Quality System ACCREDITATION For the Clinical Laboratories

IAF Mandatory Document IAF MANDATORY DOCUMENT FOR THE APPLICATION OF ISO/IEC FOR AUDITS OF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Guidelines for the assessment of the appropriateness of small interlaboratory comparisons within the process of laboratory accreditation

Requirements for the acceptance of quality systems by the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA)

EUROLAB European Federation of National Associations of Measurement, Testing and Analytical Laboratories

Guidance on the Application. of ISO / IEC Accreditation International Association for Certifying Bodies

PEFC Certification System Netherlands - Scheme Description

Pros and Cons of a Regulation on Accreditation and Verification for the purposes of the EU ETS

Thang Hooi Chiew. [Fifth Sub-Regional Training Workshop on Timber Legality Assurance, Jakarta, Indonesia, 6-8 October 2016]

ILAC-P10:2002. ILAC Policy on Traceability of Measurement Results

Report. Sectorial scheme for accreditation of notified bodies under Directive 2008/57/EC HARMONISED REQUIREMENTS

Project Fiche IPA Annual Action Programme 2007 for Bosnia and Herzegovina Strengthening of the BiH Metrology system

IAF/ILAC Multi-Lateral Mutual Recognition Arrangements (Arrangements): Template report for the peer evaluation of an Accreditation Body based on

Rules for accreditation of providers of proficiency testing/interlaboratory

IECEE-ILAC-IAF Guidance for the Conduct of Unified Assessments in the Electrotechnical Sector

Measuring Instruments Directive 2014/32/EU Assessment of Notified Bodies in Charge of Type Examination Presumption of Conformity based on EN 17065

IAF Informative Document For Management of Extraordinary Events or Circumstances Affecting ABs, CABs and Certified Organizations

ANNEX: cross border electronic transactions. The old framework the e Signature Directive of 1999 was a big step. However, the European

Inter American Accreditation Cooperation IAAC APPLICATION FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PROVIDERS

June 2011 COMMON CRITERIA EMBRACE, REFORM, EXTEND. Presented by:

An Opinion of the EFTA Consultative Committee INTERNAL MARKET STRATEGY PRIORITIES And the follow-up on the EFTA side

Explanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment

Addressing Perceived Barriers to the Acceptance of Third Party Certification

Explanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment

Compliance through Competence Welding coordinator competence assessment for railway vehicle components

Explanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment

Technical document EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES SEEKING NOTIFICA TION

ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN

Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability

ASEAN GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE (GRP) GUIDE

Title: How to assess a PQS testing laboratory Table of Content

Explanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN-G of on the CSM for risk assessment

ASEAN GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE (GRP) GUIDE

Application Guide for the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN-G of on the CSM for risk assessment

The establishment of a National Accreditation Body;

Principles of the Railway Industry Supplier Qualification Scheme

UKAS Supplement for the Accreditation of Environmental Verifiers for EMAS (the EU Eco Management and Audit Scheme Regulation 1221/2009)

NATIONAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR A BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

ILAC P10 TRACEABILITY

EMAS KEY BENEFITS FOR ORGANISATIONS AND AUTHORITIES

R e s p o n s i b l e C a r e. The safety, health and environmental initiative of the chemical industry

FACILITATING TRADE 1

POSITION. Smallholder Group Certification for Organic Production & Processing

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin National Metrology Institute. Rapid Diagnostic Tool Legal Metrology.

CEN and CENELEC s ambitions to 2020

WELMEC Application of module D Quality assurance Under directive 2014/32/EU (MID) or directive 2014/31/EU (NAWID)

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

ENERGY EFFICIENCY CERTIFICATION. Craig Davenport - Certification Manager Energy Efficiency & Special Programs June 20, 2018

Improving U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulations

ITP: 304 GLOBAL Quality Infrastructure Development in Support of World Trade

BUILDING TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURES TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE DCMAS NETWORK BACKGROUND PAPER CONTENTS. BULLETIN No.80/2010/REV.

Equipment Certification and Importation Procedures Authentication of certificates and ensuring that approval requirements are met

Equipment Certification and Importation Procedures Authentication of certificates and ensuring that approval requirements are met

SANAS Transition Policy: ISO/IEC 17020: 2012

Economic and Social Council

66 items 70% of circulated products

IL AC-G22:2004. Use of Proficiency Testing as a Tool for Accreditation in Testing

Market Surveillance and Enforcement

REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION OF INSPECTION BODIES

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE COOPERATION BETWEEN CEN, CENELEC AND ETSI AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION

The integration of quality management systems in testing laboratories: a practitioner s report

IAF Mandatory Document. for the Audit and Certification of a Management System Operated by a Multi-Site Organization (IAF MD 1:2018)

Use of Manufacturers Laboratories For Surveillance Testing

April 30, Sincerely, Roger Brockway Director General

Transcription:

EA MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT Facilitating cross border trade with reliable goods and services

The importance of accreditation of conformity assessment bodies has substantially increased over the last decades. Consumers, businesses, regulators and other organisations all over the world want to be able to trust and have confidence in the goods and services they buy and use. Consequently, there has been a growth in specified national and international requirements for products, processes and services. THE BENEFITS OF ACCREDITATION Facilitates cross border trade Accreditation is of major importance for the development of Europe s internal market, as this facilitates cross border trade, eliminates barriers to trade and ensure a better regulation between EU Member States Minimises product failure or recalls Product testing carried out by a reliable independent organisation will minimise products failing, potential recalls and help organizations to save money Delivers Public Confidence Despite a complex global marketplace, accreditation gives us confidence through ensuring consistently high standards in the quality of products or services purchased The importance of accreditation has been further strengthened following the implementation of the Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008, setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (hereinafter Regulation 765/2008) which, for the first time, provides a legal framework for the provision of accreditation services across Europe. This legal framework identifies European co-operation for Accreditation (EA) as an important association and defines its responsibilities and obligations. EA is an association of national accreditation bodies in Europe, set up in 1997, that are officially recognised by their national Governments to assess and accredit - against international standards - organisations that carry out conformity assessment services. For 20 years, EA has provided a framework for the mutual recognition of accredited conformity assessment results, to promote development and transfer of knowledge, improve accreditation and conformity assessment activities in Europe and together with the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) at a global level. OUR MISSION Ensure confidence in accredited conformity assessments results through harmonized operation of accreditation activities in support of European and global economies. The role of EA is defined by three dimensions: Strategic by developing accreditation to facilitate the market for conformity assessment services in close cooperation with European regulators, stakeholders and other interested parties; Operational in cooperating with regulators, stakeholders and other interested parties, including its members the national accreditation bodies in managing accreditation in specific sectors or areas to ensure that the parties have a common understanding and approach to the accreditation criteria in order to arrive at trustworthy attestations of conformity; Supportive for its members to all issues regarding accreditation and conformity assessment. 2

The EA MLA is an agreement signed between national accreditation bodies Full and Associate Members of EA to recognise the equivalence, reliability and therefore acceptance by the European market, of certification, verification, inspection and calibration certificates and test reports issued by accredited conformity assessment bodies. Voluntary and mandatory technical regulations, standards, testing and certification procedures can all serve legitimate public policy goals but they can also vary from country to country, or can be costly and burdensome in their effect. As a result they can be detrimental to businesses, hindering access to markets and export opportunities. Acknowledging this, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade strongly encourages countries to recognise the results of other countries conformity assessments. This EA MLA is providing the European market with a network of conformity assessment bodies that are competent within their scope of accreditation to issue reliable and credible statements of conformity for products and services, thereby reducing costs and adding value to business and consumers. This contributes to the freedom of trade by eliminating technical barriers. For National Accreditation Bodies (NABs) located outside the EU or EFTA, signing a bilateral agreement with EA under the conditions applicable to EA MLA signatories gives access to the European market to products tested by conformity assessment bodies accredited by AB Associate members of EA. It enables recognition of test, certification and inspection results on the European market thus facilitating export and trade between Europe and non-european countries. Accreditation of Activity Laboratories Testing and Medical examinations Laboratories Calibration Certification Bodies Product certification Certification Bodies Certification of persons Certification Bodies Management systems certification Inspection Inspection Validation and verification Validation and verification Proficiency Testing Providers Proficiency Testing Providers Standards EN ISO/IEC 17025 EN ISO 15189 EN ISO/IEC 17025 EN ISO/IEC 17065 EN ISO/IEC 17024 EN ISO/IEC 17021 EN ISO/IEC 17020 EN ISO 14065 EN ISO/IEC 17043 2016 EA MLA KEY FIGURES 38 EA member signatories (34 Full Members and 4 Associate Members through a bilateral agreement with EA out of a total of 36 Full Members and 13 Associate Members) 19 EA NABs peer evaluated, therefor evaluators spent around 1,138 man-days 101 assigned peer evaluator team members and 12 trainees 34 MAC Members appointed in the Task Force Groups for the review of PE reports, 9 MAC Management Group members in addition to the MAC Chair and Vice Chair More than 34,600 accreditations delivered by EA MLA signatories 3

According to article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 Setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) 339/93, EA has been recognized by the European Commission to operate the peer evaluation system of national accreditation bodies. EA MLA PROCESS 1- APPLICATION The National Accreditation Bodies applies for MLA signatory status for specific scopes. The MLA Council Secretariat reviews the application and appoints an evaluation team. 2- PEER EVALUATION The team performs the document review (quality management system documents, procedures of the national accreditation body etc.) and a pre-evaluation is conducted where applicable. Then, the team carries out the on-site evaluation. The evaluation combines evaluation of the management system at the office with observation of assessments carried out by the NAB. 3- REPORT & DECISION The team drafts the evaluation report. Findings are approved with the NAB at the closing meeting. A task force group (TFG) appointed by the EA MLA Council management group looks at the evaluation report to issue a recommendation for consideration by EA MLA Council. The EA MAC takes a decision and the EA publications and website are updated accordingly. The peer evaluation (PE) process is currently being further strengthened to accommodate the specific needs of regulatory fields to raise the reassurance of sector based stakeholders and regulators that the accreditation bodies technical competence is thoroughly assessed. The purpose of on-site evaluations is to verify the accreditation body signatories continuing compliance with the internationally agreed criteria for accreditation bodies. The EA MLA provides a framework to realise the objective Accredited once, accepted everywhere. EA and its member accreditation bodies invest significant efforts and resources to maintain the integrity and robustness of the EA MLA through a rigorous PE process. A new IT to digitize the peer evaluation system Several measures have been implemented to improve the MAC operations: implementing a professional software is one of those. This IT system will be designed for the daily management of evaluators and peer evaluations to facilitate the work of all the persons involved, the EA Secretariat and the MAC Management Group members, team members, team leaders and deputy team leaders, NABs under evaluation, trainers and trainees. It will give users access to PE records, documents, templates and forms in a more friendly way and support the reinforcement of performance management, the development of PE resource pool, with a better knowledge of the detailed competencies of EA evaluators to enhance quality and expertise of evaluation teams. I will also help managing sampling to allow the comprehensive review by the team of all scopes and competence covered by the NAB over the PE cycle. 4

A long term project for the re-engineering of the peer evaluation system The project will involve all EA members and stakeholders and develop based on 3 major objectives: 1. Re-think the PE model and methods for instance by implementing a new sampling approach for the proper coverage of the NAB range of activities 2. Re-think the decision-making process to enhance transparence, smoothness and consistency of decisions 3. Streamline the reporting process to ensure harmonization and consistency for a better decision-making Training and knowledge-sharing In order to support the necessary development of the EA pool of evaluators to serve an increasingly busy PE program, EA organises regularly newcomer trainings. These workshops intend to give the participants the specifics of a peer evaluation and a common level of understanding of the procedures, requirements and their application. It aims also to provide the potential team members with insight in the management processes supporting the peer evaluation system. The objective is to qualify as many participants as possible as trainees or team members directly, to be assigned quickly and be able to confirm their qualification thus reinforcing the EA resources. NAB assessors are trained during 3 days through presentations and discussions in work groups about how an EA evaluator should assess the effective implementation of the requirements (review of documents or records, interviews, observation/witness, etc.), looking for evidence and identifying specific risks and causes of non-compliance. Case studies and role play exercises are used extensively. At the end of the workshop, the trainers review the performance of each participant and come up with a recommendation about qualification as an EA evaluator, based on: Demonstration by the participants of their understanding and awareness of the evaluation process and the evaluation requirements. Demonstrated ability to work as evaluator (open minded, team worker, communication skills, in particular, communication in English). Demonstration of dedication to the work as evaluator. Qualification and performance are then continuously monitored by EA in close cooperation with the EA accreditation body members. Newcomer training, hosted by RvA, the Dutch NAB, in June 2017 in Utrecht, Netherlands. 5

The well-established, harmonised and transparent assessment procedures involved in the accreditation processes carried out by EA MLA signatories are applicable to all forms of conformity assessment and deliver benefits across the full range of economic activities. National governments and regulators Accreditation can be used to support implementation of European or national legislation. It provides a stamp of approval to demonstrate compliance against agreed standards and requirements. Accreditation minimizes risk as decisions can be based on reliable certificates or reports and there can be greater confidence in the data being used to establish baselines for monitoring and enforcement. The EA MLA provides a framework that allows Governments to rely on data from accredited organizations in other countries Consumers Accreditation can impact positively on all aspects of our daily life from the safety of the products we buy to the quality of the environment we live in. The accreditation of testing, inspection and certification ensures that these activities are carried out by competent organisations. The influence of accreditation may not always be recognised or understood by the consumer but it plays an important role in ensuring that he or she has access to goods and services of consistent and reliable quality and safety Industry and the business community Exporting and access to new markets is made easier and less expensive because having once been tested or certified by an EA MLA-accredited body, there should be no need to re-test or re-certify a product for foreign markets. Importing goods and services with an EA MLA-accredited report or certificate can be both less risky and cheaper because accreditation confirms conformity to recognised standards of consistency and quality and can therefore also avoid the costs of re-testing. Being recognised internationally, the EA MLA opens new opportunities on the global market. Buying conformity assessment services from an organisation accredited by an EA MLA signatory can also help businesses differentiate their services by providing evidence of technical competence, impartiality and compliance with international requirements within their supply chain. The European Commission The importance of accreditation to the EU s and EFTA s economic infrastructure is recognised in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 which provides a legal framework for the provision of accreditation services across Europe Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 covers the operation of accreditation in support of voluntary conformity assessment as well as conformity assessment required by European legislation. It provides Commission Directorates with the legal basis to ensure confidence in the consistent and harmonised implementation of legislation across Europe based on accreditation. The existence of the EA MLA means that national authorities in Member States can recognise - in accordance with article 11 (2) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 the equivalence of accreditation services provided by peer evaluated national accreditation bodies and therefore the equivalence of reports and certificates issued by the conformity assessment bodies they have accredited. This supports a harmonised implementation of Community legislation. 6

Acceptance in the marketplace of the EA MLA - and therefore of the conformity assessment results provided by conformity assessment bodies accredited by EA MLA signatories - is of major importance for the development of industry and business opportunities by removing the need to re-test or certify a product in each and every country. AN EXAMPLE OF BENEFIT OF THE EA MLA How an EU manufacturer can sell hot-water boilers in Canada 1/ Recognized Accreditation Bodies To allow EU manufacturers to sell their products on the Canadian market, EU Recognized Accreditation Bodies will accredit EU Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs). That means that they will assess and confirm the technical competence of CABs offering, for example, testing services in compliance with the Canadian legislation, in the fields mentioned listed in the Conformity Assessment Protocol. 2/ Conformity Assessment Bodies Then, the EU Conformity Assessment Bodies will deliver conformity assessment services to confirm that products hot water boilers in our example- comply with the Canadian requirements (legislation, standard and other relevant specifications). 3/ Canadian government The Canadian government will authorize the EU manufacturer due to the certificate issued by the Conformity Assessment Body to export its hot-water boilers on the Canadian market and apply the relevant marking. 4/ EU manufacturer Once the hot-water boilers have been marked, the manufacturer will be able to sell them on the Canadian market and benefit from a competitive advantage in terms of reputation and credibility for future consumers. 5/ Consumers The Canadian consumers will buy, in full confidence, the hot-water boiler, produced by the EU manufacturer. What does this mean at the end? Thanks to the EA MLA, whatever the technical field and the market, industry can save time and money by making the informed choice to procure conformity assessment services from an organisation accredited by an EA MLA signatory. Businesses are able to differentiate their products and services, as well as being able to exploit overseas opportunities opened up through the mutual recognition arrangements. 7

WHY THE EA MLA INSPIRES MARKET CONFIDENCE? NABs are admitted to the MLA only after meticulous peer evaluation of their operations to check their compliance with the internationally agreed standard for accreditation bodies. These evaluations are repeated at least every 4 years. Evaluations are carried out by experienced senior staff from other NABs and the process is observed by personnel from the European Commission, national authorities, and representatives of the EA Advisory Board consisting of stakeholders and other interested parties in the business and regulatory community. Evaluations include office-based scrutiny as well as the observation of assessor visits in order to determine that, before being accredited, conformity assessment bodies are examined in sufficient depth to establish their competence, impartiality, performance capability and their sustainability. To ensure consistency, transparency and acceptability to all, the peer-evaluation process is itself continuously updated to take into account the changing needs of business, regulators and national authorities. EA regularly reviews market feedback through complaints and benchmarking processes from organisations represented on the EA Advisory Board, including the European Commission, and from other stakeholders and interested parties. The EA MLA is recognized at international level by ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) and IAF (International Accreditation Forum). This means that a test report or certificate accredited by an EA MLA signatory is also recognized by the signatories to the IAF and ILAC multilateral agreements. IAF and ILAC have developed MLA marks which can be used by their member accreditation bodies and their conformity assessment bodies under specific conditions set out in a license agreement. Thanks to this recognition, international markets have confidence in the EA MLA and the conformity assessment results provided by organisations accredited by EA MLA signatories. Because of this, there is no need for products and services to be re-tested, re-calibrated, re-inspected or re-certified in each country into which they are imported and sold. This helps the free movement of goods and services in Europe and the rest of the world. EA and its members are working actively in both associations with the purpose of ensuring that the European accreditation system is recognized at the global level and that the development of the international accreditation system as far as possible is in line with the accreditation policy adopted and implemented in Europe. Moreover, as a Recognized Regional Accreditation Group, EA is peer evaluated every four years to confirm that its membership and MLA peer evaluation criteria and processes meet ILAC and IAF requirements. As a result of the peer review of EA, ILAC and IAF renewed their confidence in EA and its members in October 2016 by deciding to maintain EA in their MLA/MRA respectively for testing, medical testing, calibration, inspection, management systems, products certification, and certification of persons. To get more information about EA MLA www.european-accreditation.org - secretariat@european-accreditation.org 75 avenue Parmentier F-75544 PARIS Cedex 11 - FRANCE Tel: 33 (0)1 40 21 24 62 @Eaccreditation Copyright EA 2017