Intervening factors in the consumption of water in residential buildings in the city of Joinville

Similar documents
PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R084-16

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R144-17

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R July 8, 2015

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R August 21, 2013

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R April 10, 2012

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R December 21, 2011

401 KAR 63: C.F.R. Part 63 national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants.

Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards Reference Table (RT) for Air Quality Permits

CHAPTER EIGHT GEOSIRIS. Outline of GeOSIRIS Panels CHAPTER EIGHT GEOSIRIS 229

Agenda of Regular Board Meeting

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R Effective September 14, 2012

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R Effective October 26, 2011

Phosphogypsum Stacks (Not Delegated) Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings (Not Delegated)

APPENDIX Q. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE [NEW]

APPENDIX Q. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE [REVOKED]

Estimation of water consumption in multifamily residential buildings

AGLS Undergraduate Programs Council October 5, :30 p.m., 126 Kleberg MINUTES

APPENDIX Q. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE [REVOKED]

APPENDIX Q, TITLE 40, CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE [NEW]

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R Effective October 26, 2011

Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings (Not Delegated)

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Fact Sheet

401 KAR 60: C.F.R. Part 60 standards of performance for new stationary sources.

Departamento de Ciências Atmosféricas Universidade de São Paulo Phone: Fax:

Rule 422 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS)

Rule 422 NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS)

R-SQUARED RESID. MEAN SQUARE (MSE) 1.885E+07 ADJUSTED R-SQUARED STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMATE

Administrator means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and his or designee.

energy usage summary (both house designs) Friday, June 15, :51:26 PM 1

STAT 2300: Unit 1 Learning Objectives Spring 2019

WATER END-USE AND EFFICIENCY PROJECT (WEEP) A CASE STUDY

rat cortex data: all 5 experiments Friday, June 15, :04:07 AM 1

Optimal Harvesting Model for Mountain Ginseng (Panax ginseng) Production in South Korea

Competitive 1899 L Street, No. 23. EPA s Competen. advocacy deadlines. codified in. July 10, Institute.

Economic Analysis of Korea Green Building Certification System in the Capital Area Using House-Values Index

Dr. Allen Back. Aug. 26, 2016

Multilevel Models. David M. Rocke. June 6, David M. Rocke Multilevel Models June 6, / 19

THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RETROFITTING SANITARY FIXTURES IN RESTROOMS OF A UNIVERSITY BUILDING. A Thesis BYOUNG HOON HWANG

Performance of the Sievers 500 RL On-Line TOC Analyzer

The Compromise Effect in Market Settings

Appendix A: Business Cases

Economic and Social Council

ENV2.2 Potable water demand and waste water volume

Measurement in schools and kindergartens in different town and regions in Bulgaria

Pay Equity Office Results of the Wage Gap Pilot Program

SAARC Training Workshop Program Identification, Comparison and Scenario Based Application of Power Demand/ Load Forecasting Tools

Lab 1: A review of linear models

Potential reduction in potable water consumption by reusing rainwater in urban centers

Allen-Morrison, Lynchburg, VA Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

Ownership and energy efficiency in multi-dwelling buildings A Swedish case study

Data Visualization. Prof.Sushila Aghav-Palwe

RULES & REGULATIONS APPENDICES

Data from a dataset of air pollution in US cities. Seven variables were recorded for 41 cities:

HYDROLOGY DIVISION UNNUMBERED REPORTS. (Report number for purposes of locating reports in library only)

Decentralized Water Infrastructure for Growing Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental, Social, and Financial Implications

Hearst Challenge : A Framework to Learn Magazine Sales Volume

CITY OF GUELPH WATER EFFICIENCY STRATEGY UPDATE Summary

Towards a behaviour model for the evaluation and optimization of water consumptions in primary schools

A multivariate econometric approach for domestic water demand modeling: An application to Kathmandu, Nepal

Integrated Modeling of the Food, Energy, and Water System

Nevada NSF EPSCoR 12/12/12

Analysis of Energy Consumption for Building Operations in Los Angeles County

AP Statistics Part 1 Review Test 2

SCENARIO: We are interested in studying the relationship between the amount of corruption in a country and the quality of their economy.

SPSS 14: quick guide

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 4155 SUMMARY

This chapter will present the research result based on the analysis performed on the

STATISTICS PART Instructor: Dr. Samir Safi Name:

PART 11. OTHER SOLID WASTE INCINERATION UNITS [NEW]

Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) software, Version 7.1

Chapter 3. Displaying and Summarizing Quantitative Data. 1 of 66 05/21/ :00 AM

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering

TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. Regional Examples

United States of America. Measures to Implement the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Article 3: Mercury supply sources and trade

Smart Buildings and districts, our realizations, our vision EU Delegation in Japan Feb 24th, 2015

Ho w Can Daycon. and

Super-marketing. A Data Investigation. A note to teachers:

Carnuel Waste Water System Improvements Project Public Hearing March 27, 2013

Statistics 201 Summary of Tools and Techniques

For Practice Only. Civil Engineering & Architecture Final Examination. Part C College Credit Performance. Fall/Winter Student Name: Date:

UNDERSTANDING RESIDENT S PREFERENCES FOR MORE SUSTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN RIPARIAN MUSI, PALEMBANG

IBFT- Account Number Formats

Interaction Rpb2 Clamp core

Can Parks Inhibit Outdoor Water Use? Eve Halper, PhD. Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona October 27, 2011

4E ANALYSES AND SUSTAINABLITITY INDEX OF LINEAR FRESNEL REFLECTOR

Environmental Performance Measurement of the Simple Urban Housing in Martubung Medan

Probability Of Booking

Appendix E. UC Sustainable Water Systems Policy

SPSS Guide Page 1 of 13

FIRST FLUSH CONTROL FOR URBAN RAINWATER HARVEST SYSTEMS

CEE3710: Uncertainty Analysis in Engineering

City of Redondo Beach Community Energy Efficiency Strategies

ACSA Faculty Design Award

CHAPTER 3. Quantitative Demand Analysis

Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Building Certifications in Brazil

The Effects of Individual Horizon Preferences and Project Horizon on Managers Resource Allocation Decisions Under a Subordinate-Superior Framework

Effect of Weather Variables on Wheat Yield

Table. XTMIXED Procedure in STATA with Output Systolic Blood Pressure, use "k:mydirectory,

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report

RAINWATER HARVESTING FOR DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION IN BANGLADESH

Transcription:

Intervening factors in the consumption of water in residential buildings in the city of Joinville Talita Flores Dias Andreza Kalbusch Elisa Henning Santa Catarina State University

Introduction Why is it important to study water consumption in buildings? balance between the demand and the availability of resources; the prediction of water consumption in buildings is indispensable in the management of water use in cities.

Introduction studies on the subject have been conducted around the world (some of them have been published on Journal of Cleaner Production in recent years). study that reflects the reality of water consumption in Brazil?

Objective Identify the factors that may influence water consumption in residential buildings in the city of Joinville (Southern Brazil), through the analysis of socioeconomic and constructive variables.

Data were collected from 47 buildings located in the city of Joinville, Southern Brazil; These buildings contain 1422 housing units; 4346 inhabitants. Material and Methods

Material and Methods In the sample there are low-income buildings and high-standard buildings

Socioeconomic aspects were investigated, as well as the constructive characteristics of the buildings: Distance from the building to the city downtown; Neighborhood income; Percentage of men; Material and Methods Age of the district's population (60 and over); Educational level of the residents;

Percentage of renters; Presence of public sewage system; Number of apartments; Average area of the apartments; Number of blocks; Number of floors; Age of the building; Number of rooms;

Number of bathrooms; Presence of rooms for employees; Bathtubs in the apartments; Elevator; Average number of residents per apartment; Type of water consumption measurement system (Individual or Collective); Time elapsed since the last renovation in the plumbing system;

Pool(s); Playground; Alternative water supply system (well, water reuse or rainwater harvesting system).

Material and Methods Two models were elaborated with the following dependent variables: Per capita water consumption (liters/person/day); Total building water consumption (m³/day).

Material and Methods the multiple linear regression method was used. due to the fact that the model has more than one regressor (independent variable) and the (dependent) response variable is quantitative. y = β 0 + β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 +... + β k x k + Ɛ

Results Water consumption (n=47 buildings): Variable Min 1 st Quartile Median Mean 3 rd Quartile Max Standard Deviation Building water consumption (m³/day) 0.6338 5.0380 5.9890 9.4320 8.1020 64.9300 11.378020 Per capita water consumption (L/person/day) 12.1900 76.0900 104.9000 108.9000 128.7000 243.0000 43.538970

Results Building water consumption (m 3 /day): The results indicate significant coefficients for variables related to the information regarding the socioeconomic and constructive aspects of the building, as follows:

Estimate Std error t p-value Intercept -113.05105 25.74192-4.392 0.000109 *** Porcentage of men 2.05536 0.51730 3.973 0.000363 *** Number of apartments 0.24850 0.07148 3.476 0.001445 ** Average apartment area 0.03236 0.02292 1.412 0.167267 Number of blocks 2.38848 0.50850 4.697 4.49e-05 *** Number of floors 0.73977 0.19889 3.720 0.000740 *** Age of the building 0.36392 0.09180 3.964 0.000372 *** Number os rooms -0.11036 0.04094-2.696 0.010970 * Number of bathrooms 0.21223 0.03699 5.738 2.09e-06 *** Rooms for employees -4.44656 2.42577-1.833 0.075829. Inhabitants per 0.76836 apartment 0.43325 1.773 0.085381. Time since renovation in 2.15705 the building 0.96865 2.227 0.032894 * Pool -4.74863 1.84940-2.568 0.014956 * Alternative water -5.12371 supply system 1.19486-4.288 0.000147 *** Significance level 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05. 0.1 1 F = 108.7 p-valor = 2.2e-16 R² = 97.72 adjusted R² = 96.82%.

The model residuals are independent and normally distributed. Normallity test Shapiro-Wilk (p-value = 0. 09991) Histogram residuals building water consumption

Model for Building water consumption (m 3 /day): WW = 113,05 + 2,06(%mmm) + 0,25(n aaaa ) + 0,03(aaaa aaaa ) + 2,39(n bbbbb ) + 0,74(n ffffff ) + 0,36(aaa bbbb ) 0,11(n rrr ) + 0,21(n bbbbb ) 4,44(rrr eee ) + 0,77 iiiii aaaa + 2,15(tt rrrr ) 4,74(pppp) 5,12(WW aaaaaaa )

Per capita water consumption (L/person/day) The analysis presented significant coefficients for the following variables:

Estimate Std error t p-value Intercept 2.6493 37.4446 0.071 0.944022 Distance downtown 15.5101 5.5567 2.791 0.008662 ** Educational level 14.1742 10.0776 1.407 0.168922 % renters -21.4488 16.0911-1.333 0.191675 Sewage system 30.0629 15.2234 1.975 0.056709. Number of blocks -8.6713 4.0432-2.145 0.039437 * Number of floors 2.3352 1.7845 1.309 0.199707 Age of the building 4.9715 0.7020 7.082 4.16e-08 *** Number of rooms -0.2331 0.1474-1.582 0.123237 Number of bathrooms 0.8783 0.2903 3.025 0.004791 ** Rooms for employees 33.0921 19.2833 1.716 0.095518. Bathtub -41.0755 17.8881-2.296 0.028148 * Inhabitants per apartment -12.1967 3.5470-3.439 0.001602 ** Aternative water supply -41.2361 10.8477-3.801 0.000589 *** system Level of significance 0 *** 0.001 ** 0.01 * 0.05. 0.1 1 F = 17.85 p-value = 2.694e-11 R² = 87.55 Adjusted R² = 82.65%.

Model residuals exhibit a normal distribution, supported by the Shapiro-Wilk test (p-value 0.9732). Histogram residuals per capita water consumption

Model for Per capita water consumption (L/person/day): PPPP = 2,65 + 15,51(dddd ddddd ) + 14,17(eeee lll ) 21,45(% rrrrrrr ) + 30,06(sss ssss ) 8,67(n bbbbb ) + 2,34(n ffffff ) + 4,97(aaa bbbb ) 0,23(n rrr ) + 0,88(n bbbbb ) + 33,09(rrr eee ) 41,08(bbbbbb) 12,20 iiiii aaaa 41,24(WW aaaaaaa )

Conclusions In the face of water scarcity problem that has been perceived, there is a need to identify which factors influence the consumption of water in residential buildings. Also, how these factors affect consumption. Only through the knowledge of these factors and characteristics, strategies for saving water in the built environment can be developed.

The work continues... Model was developed with data from 89 buildings, 3171 housing units and 9112 inhabitants. The results are promising and will be tested in a building outside the sample. THANK YOU! Andreza Kalbusch, Dr. Eng. andreza.kalbusch@udesc.br