SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS. charteredaccountantsanz.com

Similar documents
Consultation Paper 265: Communicating audit findings to directors, audit committees or senior managers

Proposed application material relating to professional scepticism and professional judgement

Joint submission by Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants

APS-1(revised) Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements to Report Factual Findings

Joint submission by Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants

Professional scepticism: its implications on audits of financial statements

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 315 (Revised June 2016)

FAQ «QUESTIONS / REPONSES» - FREQUENTLY ASK QUESTIONS

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2019) Agenda Item

Submission on Consultation Paper: Professional Scepticism Meeting Public Expectations

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item 12-C

Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements

Independent Auditor s report

International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 500

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 600 (Revised June 2016)

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING (NEW ZEALAND) 210

IAASB Main Agenda (December 2011) Agenda Item

International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 315

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 701

STATEMENT OF AUDITING STANDARDS 500 AUDIT EVIDENCE

Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements

International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 500 Audit Evidence

DFSA S AUDIT MONITORING PROGRAMME. Public Report 2014

6 Assessment of risk Introduction General risk assessment Specific risk assessment Reliability factors 50 6.

Detailed competency map

REGISTERED CANDIDATE AUDITOR (RCA) TECHNICAL COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS

AUDITOR-GENERAL S AUDITING STANDARD 4 THE AUDIT OF PERFORMANCE REPORTS. Contents

Scope of this SA Effective Date Objective Definitions Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence... 6

(Effective for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2013) CONTENTS

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING (NEW ZEALAND) 500

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING (NEW ZEALAND) 315 (Revised)

AGREEING THE TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENTS SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 210 AGREEING THE TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENTS

Completion and review

AUDIT RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBJECTIVES

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 500 AUDIT EVIDENCE CONTENTS

Allotts Business Services Limited. Management Report to The Hayfield School

Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 701 COMMUNICATING KEY AUDIT MATTERS IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS

Professional Competence for Engagement Partners Responsible for Audits of Financial Statements (Revised)

Sharing experiences on audit quality. A selection of ideas and initiatives intended to assist the promotion of consistent audit quality in Australia

- 1 - Ethics and you. An introduction to the CIPFA Standard of Professional Practice on Ethics. July

Presenter: CPA CATHERINE MUEMA

Scope of this NSA... Effective Date... 2 Objective... 3 Definitions Requirements. Preconditions for an Audit...

Auditor regulation and oversight plan June For the three years ending 30 June 2018

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING (IRELAND) 210 AGREEING THE TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENTS

File No: PERMANENT AUDIT FILE INDEX Annual update confirmation. Business details 1. Background to client

Dispute Resolution Toolkit

Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor s Report (ISA (NZ) 701)

IOSCO Report on Good Practices for Audit Committees in Supporting Audit Quality

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board ISA 500. April International Standard on Auditing. Audit Evidence

Audit Evidence. HKSA 500 Issued July 2009; revised July 2010, May 2013, February 2015, August 2015, June 2017

The Auditor s Responses to Assessed Risks

Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements

Standards for Investment Reporting

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 620 (Revised June 2016)

IAASB Main Agenda (December 2004) Page Agenda Item

Audit quality a director s guide

SA 210 (REVISED) AGREEING THE TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENTS (EFFECTIVE FOR ALL AUDITS RELATING TO ACCOUNTING PERIODS BEGINNING ON OR AFTER APRIL 1, 2010)

Independent auditor's report

IAASB Main Agenda (September 2004) Page Agenda Item PROPOSED REVISED INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 540

Report on controls over Devon Funds Management Limited s investment management services. For the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015

Preparing for the Financial Statement Audit

Auditing Standard ASA 210 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements

STANDING ADVISORY GROUP MEETING

Audit Evidence. SSA 500, Audit Evidence superseded the SSA of the same title in September 2009.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 315 UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT CONTENTS

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 315 (REVISED)

APPENDIX A. Audit Findings Report. For the Year ended March 31, 2017

APPENDIX A. Audit Findings Report. For the Year ended March 31, 2016

Chapter 06. Audit Planning, Understanding the Client, Assessing Risks, and Responding. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Audit Evidence. ISA 500 Issued December International Standard on Auditing

Feedback Statement and Impact Assessment ISA (UK) 540 (Revised December 2018) Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures

AUSTRALIAN GAAS 2007 AUDITING STANDARDS CHECKLISTS

Guidance: Transition for Logbooks for RCA Applications under RG 180 Auditor registration (2016)

Financial Statements

3. STRUCTURING ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS

Board committees. Role of the board

QUESTION TWO Write brief explanation notes on each of the following terms:

Quality Control Systems and Engagement Files Monitoring and Inspections the Protocol

Auditing Standards and Practices Council

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 620 USING THE WORK OF AN AUDITOR S EXPERT CONTENTS

ASB Meeting January 12-15, 2015

Re: Comments on IASB s Exposure Draft, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ED/2010/6)

Guide to using the work papers

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Requirements for New Zealand Licensed Auditors

ESSEX POLICE, FIRE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER, FIRE AND RESCUE AUTHORITY

Compilation Engagements

Mapping of Original ISA 315 to New ISA 315 s Standards and Application Material (AM) Agenda Item 2-C

Allotts Business Services Ltd. Management Report to South Ossett Infants Academy Trust

Audit and Review Guidelines: Electricity and Gas Licences

ISA 500. Issued March 2009; updated June International Standard on Auditing. Audit Evidence

IAASB Main Agenda (June 2008) Page Agenda Item

Audit Workshop Part 2 12 December 2009

Probe Audit What s New Version June 2018

The Audit Plan for London Borough of Barnet

Memo. Date: October 2018 INTRODUCTION

REPORT WRITING & INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Audit and Risk Committee Charter POL-00053

Transcription:

SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS charteredaccountantsanz.com

ABOUT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand is a professional body comprised of over 120,000 diverse, talented and financially astute members who utilise their skills every day to make a difference for businesses the world over. Members are known for their professional integrity, principled judgement, financial discipline and a forward-looking approach to business which contributes to the prosperity of our nations. We focus on the education and lifelong learning of our members, and engage in advocacy and thought leadership in areas of public interest that impact the economy and domestic and international markets. We are a member of the International Federation of Accountants, and are connected globally through the 800,000-strong Global Accounting Alliance and Chartered Accountants Worldwide which brings together leading Institutes in Australia, England and Wales, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland and South Africa to support and promote over 320,000 Chartered Accountants in more than 180 countries. About this publication This publication is part of a series which has been developed to assist auditors build the on-the-job skills needed to competently and confidently interact with clients, obtain information in an efficient, professional manner, and escalate relevant information within the audit team. This publication provides illustrative examples to help auditors understand how to apply professional scepticism in specific audit areas. The publication is intended to supplement each firm s own training, rather than as a substitute for it. It should be read, and applied, in conjunction with the relevant auditing, accounting, and professional and ethical standards. It provides nonauthoritative guidance. We also have a strategic alliance with the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. The alliance represents 788,000 current and next generation accounting professionals across 181 countries and is one of the largest accounting alliances in the world providing the full range of accounting qualifications to students and business. Disclaimer This Guide has been prepared for use by members of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ). It is not intended for use by any person who is not a CA ANZ member and/or does not have appropriate expertise in the Guide's subject matter. Laws, practices and regulations may have changed since publication of this Guide. Users should make their own inquiries as to the currency of relevant laws, practices and regulations. No warranty is given as to the correctness of the information contained in this Guide, or of its suitability for use by you. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CA ANZ is not liable for any statement or opinion, or for any error or omission contained in this publication and disclaims all warranties with regard to the information contained in it, including, without limitation, all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CA ANZ is not liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential losses or damages of any kind, or loss of profit, loss or corruption of data, business interruption or indirect costs, arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication or the information contained in it, whether such loss or damage arises in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, or otherwise. 2016 Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand ABN 50 084 642 571. 1146-46 All rights reserved. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 2

SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS In order to bring the art of enquiry to life, we have developed the following case studies to demonstrate the types of questions that might be useful in specific audit areas: 1. System changes: revenue system 2. Financial statement disclosures: fixed asset note disclosure 3. Related party disclosures In the following pages we provide tips and examples of questions that may arise in these audit areas. When developing your questions it is important that you think about the assertion you are trying to address. You should focus on getting comfort over the key assertions in each of these audit areas. TIP: Regardless of the audit area you are working on make sure you use all of your fraud finding faculties. These are: Your nose, for smelling something fishy Your eyes, for seeing what is in front of you, and what may be on the horizon Your ears, for listening out for anything that may indicate an issue worth following up Your mouth, for articulating questions Your brain, for pulling all the information together Your gut, to assess whether the responses make sense, and to help you follow your gut instinct. For further explanation, watch Wayne Tukiri CA, RSM, explain the use of your fraud finding faculties at www.charteredaccountantsanz.com/fraud CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 3

1. CASE STUDY: REVENUE SYSTEM CHANGES Each financial year the audit team are required to develop an understanding of the clients overall control environment and the systems and processes that are relevant to the audit. The ISAs also require the auditor to evaluate the design of these controls and determine whether they have been implemented 1. Unless it is a new client, the previous year s audit file should contain documentation of the key systems and controls. A useful starting point is to read through this documentation and then update it through discussion with the client and by looking at other sources of information, such as client documentation and website information. The assertions relating to revenue are primarily around completeness, accuracy, cut-off and occurrence. These have been summarised below. Assertions Completeness Revenue example All revenue has been fully accounted for and included in the financial statements. Accuracy Cut-off Occurrence Revenue has been calculated accurately. Any adjustments at source have been correctly reconciled and accounted for. Revenue recognised during the period relates to the current accounting period. Any accrued revenue or revenue received in advance has been accounted for correctly in the financial statements (ie appropriately included in debtors or liabilities). Revenue has been incurred in respect of the entity. Classification Revenue has been fairly allocated in accordance with the categories required by the relevant financial reporting framework. The risk of under or over statement of revenue depends to a large extent on whether the client is incentivised to increase or decrease profit, which will depend on a number of contextual factors. For this reason it is essential that the auditor undertaking the revenue section (and any other audit section for that matter) has a good understanding of the overall business environment the entity is operating in and any incentives that may exist. BE SPECIFIC BUT NOT TOO SPECIFIC! One of the key causes for complaint from clients is being asked the same questions by the audit team year on year. For this reason it is often a good idea to design or frame your questions to reassure your client that you are aware of their previous processes and that you are seeking to confirm whether any changes have been made and identify what these are. For illustration purposes we have provided three possible ways of asking for information to update the revenue system notes. These questions have varying levels of usefulness and are provided as illustrative examples only you will need to tailor to your clients circumstances. The appropriate question to ask will depend a great deal on the context in which the question is to be asked and the client s individual circumstances. Example Question Example Response/Explanation Do you have any new revenue streams, or ways of earning revenue? OK There is a risk that this question will result in a fairly general response. Your client will likely be aware that the follow up response will require them to describe these new revenue streams to you, and may want to avoid doing so due to time pressures. Have there been any significant changes in your systems and processes over revenue? GOOD As with the question above there is a risk that the client may find it easier to provide a general response to this question, rather than have to describe any changes to you. Does [insert staff members name eg Adam] still [insert key control eg reconcile all cash takings for the day to the till]? Have there been any other changes to the way you process and account for revenue or any new revenue streams? BETTER This can be a useful way to frame the question to let the client know that you have read through the prior year process notes, are aware of who previously performed the controls and are looking for the key changes. You will likely need to follow up the response to this initial question with further questions to prompt for other revenue system changes. This question does introduce an element of judgemental bias as it assumes that the control (ie cash takings being reconciled to the till) is still operating. However it may be a helpful first question to set the scene for a conversation about the client's revenue system. TIP: Cut-off is often a key risk area relating to revenue as clients may be incentivised to overstate revenue to paint a rosy picture or achieve certain bonus results. The ISAs contain a rebuttable presumption of fraud risk in relation to revenue recognition 2. What this means is that, unless you can prove otherwise, you must consider there to be a significant risk of fraud in relation to your client s processes for recognising revenue. 1 ISA 315 Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment, Para. 12 13 2 ISA 240 The Auditor s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements, Para. 26 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 4

2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT DISCLOSURES: FIXED ASSET NOTE DISCLOSURE An integral part of an audit is assessing the financial statement disclosures to ensure they comply with the applicable financial reporting standards and are consistent with the audit team s understanding of the client and the knowledge obtained during the audit. There are four main assertions that relate to the fixed asset area of the audit. These are summarised in the following table: Assertions Existence Completeness Rights and Obligations Accuracy, Valuation and Allocation Fixed assets example Fixed assets recognised in the balance sheet exist at the period end. All fixed assets that should have been recorded have been recognised in the financial statements. Any fixed assets held by a third party on behalf of the audit entity has been included in the fixed assets balance. The audit entity owns or controls the fixed assets recognised in the financial statements. Any fixed assets held by the entity on account of another entity have not been recognised. Fixed assets have been valued in accordance with the relevant financial reporting standard and not capitalised when they should have been expensed or valued inappropriately. IS IT READY? It is (unfortunately) not uncommon for the financial statements disclosures, such as the fixed asset note, to be unavailable or incomplete at the fieldwork stage of the audit. One of the first tasks of the audit should be, therefore, to ask the client for the financial statement disclosures and supporting documentation. Common questions, responses, and follow up questions, based on a request for the fixed asset note disclosure and supporting work papers, include, but are not limited to: Example Question Can you please send me the fixed asset note disclosure? [These days the client will send most of the work papers through electronically, which will make it easier for you to include in your audit system]. Example Response/Explanation I am still working on it. Great. When will you be able to send it through? [It is a good idea to get the client to commit to a time, so that you can plan your audit work and make sure you are as efficient as possible]. I will send it through as soon as I can. I can send you the PPE note, or intangible note now, or the fixed asset register, and you can start the audit work off that. Thank you, but I would prefer to audit the whole fixed asset note disclosure at the same time, as this will be more efficient for both of us. Can you let me know when you will be able to provide it and I will plan my other work around this. [Stand your ground and repeat your request for a timeframe. Explain to the client the benefit to them of you auditing the disclosure once and the downside of auditing incomplete disclosures]. I have already told your supervisor that I am working on these note disclosures as well as the cash flow statement and debtors note. I cannot work on all this at once, I need time and space to get them done. [Take the hint, thank the client, let them know you understand and retreat]. OR; OK, I totally understand. I will send the fixed asset note disclosure through by the end of the day. [If you are on the receiving end of the first response of the third question, it is probably worth ending the conversation here and escalating the delay in receiving the requested information to your supervisor. Your supervisor can then determine the best course of action to ensure your team has work to do, and the client has the space needed to prepare the work papers. One option may be to pull out of the audit until the financial statement disclosures have been completed]. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 5

3. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES In general, the key audit requirements in relation to related party disclosures are to find out from management the processes for ensuring the: identification of related parties; and completeness of related party disclosures. Related parties is often a sensitive area. As such, it is a good idea to escalate any problematic responses received from your client to your supervisor. The following assertions apply to the audit of the related party disclosures: Assertions Completeness Accuracy, Valuation and Allocation Related parties example All related parties, related party transactions and balances that should have been disclosed have been disclosed in the notes of financial statements. Related party transactions, balances and events have been disclosed accurately at their appropriate amounts. Occurrence Classification and Presentation Transactions with related parties disclosed in the notes of financial statements have occurred during the period and relate to the audit entity. The nature of related party transactions, balances and events has been clearly disclosed in the notes of financial statements. Users of the financial statements can clearly determine the financial statement captions affected by the related party transactions and balances and can easily understand their financial impact. WHAT SHOULD I ASK? The ISAs 3 require the auditor to ask the client about the: Processes for identifying related parties and transactions with related parties Nature of the relationship between related parties and the entity Type and purpose of the transactions with related parties Processes for approving transactions with related parties or outside the normal course of business Whether these transactions were conducted under normal market terms WHO TO ASK? Key client personnel to ask about related party transactions often extend beyond the finance team and include: Corporate Services Manager or equivalent Internal auditors In-house legal counsel Senior management (who may be able to approve significant transactions outside the normal course of business) As you can see there is often no clear ownership of, or responsibility for, related party transactions and, given the key assertion in relation to related party transactions is completeness, it will generally be necessary to ask management and those charged with governance (TCWG) quite broad questions to identify the existence of these transactions. Examples of common processes in place to identify related party transactions (which may resonate with your client) include: Interests declarations or interest registers Conflict of interest processes Because of the sensitive nature of related party transactions, your client may be incentivised to conceal related party transactions that they may not want disclosed in their financial statements. Other risks to be mindful of in auditing related party disclosures include the risk of management override of controls. Management override of controls is deemed to be a significant risk on every audit 4. While the entity may have effective controls in place to identify and approve related party transactions there is a risk that transactions that involve the person responsible for undertaking the identification and approval controls may not be recorded. 3 ISA 550 Related Parties 4 ISA 240 The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements, Para. 31 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 6

TIP: Be aware of the fraud risk relating to related party transactions. During the Global Financial Crisis and finance company collapses across Australia and New Zealand there were a number of instances where related party transactions had been 'concealed' or inappropriately disclosed. WHAT TESTS COULD I PERFORM? There are a number of tests that the audit team can perform to search for related party transactions, such as searching the creditors listing for the names of staff or board members and ensuring that all transactions relate to work known to be assigned to that person. You will probably need to ask your client for access to the creditors listing and/or for the full listing of staff and board members (or to confirm whether board member details provided on your clients website or in the board minutes are up-to-date and correct) to perform these tests. In the interests of transparency it is normally appropriate to let your client know why you need this information. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND SPOTLIGHT ON SPECIFIC AUDIT AREAS 7