Clinical Trial Transparency UK perspective

Similar documents
DIRECTOR v BAYER. Clinical trial disclosure (Xofigo) CASE AUTH/2908/11/16

Information for clinical researchers on transparency of clinical trial reporting

EFPIA layperson summary Principles that apply to Clinical Trial Transparency. Antonio Ferrari (Chiesi) & Solange Rohou (AZ)

GCP INSPECTION FINDINGS Singapore Research Ethics Conference 2018

IFPMA Response to World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Consultation 30 September 2005

Improving transparency of consumers' electricity charges

What are the regula+ons rela+ng to data disclosure to pa+ents? Current and future perspec+ves

Comments from: 1. General comments

Fergus Sweeney, European Medicines Agency

CT Regulation: EMA role

Nature Publishing Group: Meet the journal publishers

The new EudraVigilance System Public Communications Plan for EMA and National Competent Authorities in the EEA

Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results: Obligations and Industry Practices

SAAPI CONFERENCE Nicola Main, B.Pharm CCRA, Clinical Research Manager 04 October 2018

Not My Study Challenges of Clinical Trial Disclosure at an Academic Medical Center

Regulatory issues for academicled multinational trials in Asia: Who takes responsibility?

Meeting sponsor s criteria : strategy to collaborate, engage and deliver

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

How journals can help to make clinical trials honest, useful, and usable

RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES FRAMEWORK. Streamlining the management and governance of R&D studies in the NHS

U.S. FDA CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH UPDATE. Jeff Shuren Director Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Authorship and Algorithms: Assessing Authorship at Lilly. Jeffrey W. Clemens, Ph.D. Eli Lilly and Company

IBM Clinical Trial Management System for Sites

COMMENTS FROM EUROPABIO GENERAL COMMENTS

Procedural advice on publication of information on negative opinions and refusals of marketing authorisation applications for human medicinal products

Theme Sub-theme Quote / issue. Inconsistency and

Sunshine on Europe: impact of recent EFPIA and EU guidelines on publication planners. Susan Scott, PhD, CMPP Director, Scott Pharma Solutions Ltd

STUDY CLOSURE AND ARCHIVING

Supporting and applying research in the NHS. 1. Overview

CTFG 10 September 2010

EU regulatory tools for expedited antibacterial development programmes

Marie-Claire Good, RG and GCP Manager James Rickard, Deputy Chief Pharmacist Technical Services Cheryl Lawrence, Senior Research Pharmacist

EFPIA-PHRMA PRINCIPLES FOR RESPONSIBLE CLINICAL TRIAL DATA SHARING REPORT ON THE 2016 MEMBER COMPANY SURVEY

Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance Inspections

POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Questions And Answers To Support The

RESEARCH AUDIT Standard Operating Procedure

Trial Services. The allround trial specialist in cardiology Leading since cardialysis.com

COMBINED RISK ASSESSMENT

IMB Financial Planning CPD and Training Policy

Key concepts of the paediatric regulation and latest developments

Procedure management of variations

The European Network of Centres of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP)

Clinical Research Management Webinar Series. ClinicalTrials.gov: Compliance for Academic Medical Centers and Research Sites.

POWER OF CHOICE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM MARKET READINESS STRATEGY (VERSION 2.0)

Roles and responsibilities of members and alternates, rapporteur and peer reviewers, experts and observers of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO)

EU Portal and Database Update

Top Challenges with Late Stage Trial Master Files

Disclosure of Clinical Trial Data in EU

STUDY DOCUMENTS. DOCUMENT NO.: CR007 v4.0. Marise Buçukoğlu ISSUE DATE: 07 MAR 2017 EFFECTIVE DATE: 21 MAR INTRODUCTION

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL QUESTIONS. and ANSWERS

Annex IV to guidance for the conduct of good clinical practice inspections sponsor and CRO

Track III: International Clinical Trials: Global Compliance Norms and EU Focus

Primary Care mcta 2013: Guidance for use

Best practice for communicating R&D progress to investors and the public

SPAQA GLP Monitoring Authority Roundtable 2017

Medical Literature Monitoring

Federal agency for medicines and health products

EU Regulation Review: challenges and opportunities for industry

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

MiFID II Extraterritorial Impacts. Product Manufacturing and Distribution

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

Standard Operating Procedures

Clinical Trial Disclosure: Current US Situation

Highlights of the proposed Clinical Trials Regulation in Europe

Covering a medical advisory board meeting and creating the report or publication: The role- of the professional medical writer

IBM Clinical Trial Management System for Sites

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Commission notice on the application of Articles 3, 5 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 on orphan medicinal products (2016/C 424/03)

Impact of Clinical Trial Data Disclosure on Publication Disposition

Implementing the Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee: Inquiry on clinical trials and disclosure of data

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration and Results Reporting: Updates and Recent Activity

Pharmacovigilance Post July 2012 The new frontier

Making the case for Personalised Medicine

Stakeholder Engagement Approach (SEA)

ENCePP Plenary: New Pharmacovigilance legislation

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE PAEDIATRIC REGULATION (REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (EC) No 1901/2006, AS AMENDED)

A review of clinical trial equipment guidance. Understanding the guidance available for study managers and procurement teams

Overview of recent changes in the centralised procedure

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

Optimising early access tools: Revision of the guidelines on Accelerated Assessment and Conditional Marketing Authorisation

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Strategy

Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 7 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

New EudraVigilance functionalities and the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation preparing for change

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Development, Management & Control of Research-Related SOPs

Mandate, objectives and rules of procedure for the CVMP Ad Hoc Expert Group on Veterinary Novel Therapies (ADVENT)

Document Title: Site Recruitment and Initiation for Papworth Sponsored Studies

Author Signature: Date: 11 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

Issues identified by stakeholders: follow-up from EMA s ATMP workshop

PSMF in Practice Your Questions Answered! GPvP Symposium, 14 March 2014 Jonathan Rowell, Senior GPvP Inspector

GCP Convergence Improves Transportability of Medical Device Clinical Data

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

6th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RARE DISEASES & ORPHAN PRODUCTS ECRD 2012 Brussels

Medicines for Children

RING FENCING GUIDELINE

Joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials

Transcription:

Clinical Trial Transparency UK perspective Dr Bina Rawal Medical, Innovation & Research Director Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry January 2014 1

Outline Transparency timeline Campaign groups UK government enquiries EU and global discussions ABPI activities: Research on public disclosure of results Clinical Trials Disclosure Toolkit Monitoring disclosure of results Workshops & stakeholder engagement activities 2

Transparency timeline ABPI guidelines 2007 2007 IFPMA joint position 2009 2009 Draft CT regulation Jul 2012 2012 Bad Pharma Sep 2012 2005 IFMPA joint position 2008 ABPI guidelines 2008 update IFPMA joint position 2008 2010 IFPMA position re: pubn in literature 2010 Launch of STC Inquiry ABPI & IFPMA Codes updated 3

Transparency timeline February: submission of written evidence to STC Inquiry June: RIAT launched June: EMA consultation August: Updated AllTrials position August: Launch of ABPI CT disclosure toolkit Nov: ABPI study published 2014 PAC Report ClinicalStudyData Request.com 2013 January: launch of AllTrials March: ABPI Technical workshop April: Wellcome Trust Workshop May: Draft HRA position published May: NAO inquiry May: EU Parliament view on CT Regulation July: EFPIA - PhRMA principles Sept: STC Report 2014 December: ABPI/PSI Workshop and ABPI Disclosure Monitoring December: Council view on CT regulation 4

ABPI activities - overview Research: Commissioned a study to measure extent to which any CT result information is made publicly accessible, within 12months of product approval or trial completion. Commitments (made February 2013 to STC): Clinical Trials Disclosure Toolkit: Launched August 2013 Monitoring compliance to trials disclosure provisions in the ABPI Code of Practice: through third party service provider Evidence: Written and oral evidence submitted to House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (STC): All Party Parliamentary Group meeting on Sharing results and data in medical research Public discussion and statements: Public debates head to head with Ben Goldacre and others Multiple Blogs Workshops and meetings: ABPI/PSI workshops (March + December 2013): Discussing how historical clinical trial information could best be shared 5

ABPI Research Commissioned in Dec 2012 to provide evidence into STC Inquiry into Clinical Trials. The objective of this study was to assess the timely disclosure in the public domain of results of all the company-sponsored clinical trials in patients, related to all the new medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) over a recent 3 year period (2009 2011). It has not attempted to monitor compliance against any specific transparency requirements. The study, published in the peer-review journal Current Medical Research and Opinion (CMRO), highlights a positive trend of increasing levels of disclosure for industry-sponsored clinical trials, but shows that more remains to be done. 6

http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1185/030 07995.2013.860371 Top line results: Of the completed clinical trials associated with all 53 new medicines approved by the EMA between 2009 and 2011, 77% had results disclosed within12 months. By 31 January 2013, this had increased to 89%. Rates of results disclosure within 12 months were 71%, 81% and 86% for new medicines approved in 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively. Disclosure increased to 86%, 93% and 91% respectively by 31 January 2013 7

ABPI/PSI Workshops March 2013: Clinical trial reporting: Definitions and guiding principles: http://www.abpi.org.uk/our-work/library/industry/pages/clinical-trial-reporting.aspx December 2013: Clinical Trial Transparency: Technical standards for data sharing for old, current and future clinical trials: http://www.abpi.org.uk/our-work/library/industry/pages/workshop-2-clinical-trial- Transparency-Technical-standards-for-data-sharing-for-old,-current-and-futureclinical-trials.aspx 8

Monitoring disclosure of results In Feb 2013, ABPI announced it will put in place measures to monitor compliance to the CT transparency provisions in the ABPI Code of Practice. An independent, third party service provider has been appointed to undertake this work. Will look at products approved in 2012 and 2013 and check compliance, followup publications will be produced. The ABPI will take on the responsibility for reporting to the PMCPA noncompliance with trial registration and posting of summary results. Code of Practice provisions These measures support the current requirement in the ABPI Code of Practice which stipulates that current and future trials must be registered within 21 days of enrolling the first patient, and results must be published within one year of marketing authorisation or one year from completion for marketed products. As per 2009 IFPMA Joint Position 9

Clinical Trial Disclosure Toolkit In February 2013 ABPI committed to providing a disclosure toolkit to help companies meet their requirement for trial transparency in the ABPI Code. It provides practice guidelines, disclosure checklists and a template SOP. These materials will be updated regularly. It contains 11 documents: 1. Points to consider when managing disclosure 2. Template SOP on clinical trial registry, results posting and publications 3. Process flow maps 4. Self-training and Q&A materials: Template SOP 5. Form R100 this template form provides a framework for assigning named individuals to the SOP tasks. 6. Process checklist: Trial registration 7. Task checklist: Trial registration 8. Process checklist: Results disclosure 9. Task checklist: Results disclosure 10.Self-training and Q&A materials: Checklists 11.Links to regulatory/ government publications on transparency/ disclosure commitments. 10

Process flow maps: Clinical trial registration and results disclosure process

ABPI clinical trial disclosure toolkit disclaimer The information provided in this toolkit for companies is provided in good faith, and every reasonable effort is made to ensure that it is accurate. The toolkit is not intended and should not be construed as regulatory or legal advice. The ABPI cannot in any circumstances accept responsibility for any errors or omissions and users should satisfy themselves as to their legal obligations.

Process flow maps: Clinical trial registration process

Standard notification for process flow maps Arrows indicating direction to next process Arrows indicating direction to next process step ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Process ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ Process step ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Process step indicating a decision ~~ ~~~ ~~ Process step signaling an end of a process X ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Input: Process triggering next process step X ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Output: Process followed after previous process step

Process assumptions The company has a disclosure process in place. The steps on the following pages are based on the assumption that the company s process is followed. The company policy/sop or other company guidelines define: which trials or type of trials are in scope of the company s disclosure policy which registries/disclosure databases are to be managed what timelines apply for disclosure of new clinical trials and results of these trials the data flow for initiating and maintaining the disclosure process roles and responsibilities for disclosure tasks. If the company maintains a dedicated website to disclose results of clinical trials, the company has documentation for the systems in use and a risk assessment with regard to compliance with Computerised Systems Validation (CSV) requirements. For results of clinical trials the workflow covers posting of an ICH E3 summary as well as of registry-defined structured outputs.

Registration of a clinical trial (Part 1) (Process described is a possible flow and should not be viewed as a mandatory process) 1 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Team Share draft protocol (close to final version) with Disclosure Team Review draft registry posting for consistency with protocol & address requests for change* Provide final protocol to Disclosure Team No Disclosure Team Prepare registry posting & verify draft protocol meets business rules of applicable registries and identify technical and editorial issues in draft protocol* Update draft registry posting Business rules/ requirements met? Yes Update registry posting & verify final protocol meets business rules of applicable registries See next slide Responsibility and task assigned as per company SOP

Registration of a clinical trial (Part 2) (Process described is a possible flow and should not be viewed as a mandatory process) Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Team File protocol with IECs/ IRBs & HAs Update protocol See previous slide Update registry posting & verify final protocol meets business rules of applicable registries Yes Protocol meets requirements? No Identify noncompliance & request change(s) to protocol 2 Maintaining registry Disclosure Team Yes Submit to applicable registries Inform stakeholders Receive requests for amendments from registries Update posting Yes Impact on protocol? No Finalise

Registration of a clinical trial 1 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Responsible Party Clinical Team Disclosure Team Procedure Informs the Disclosure Team of the close-to-final protocol Reviews the draft registry posting prepared by the Disclosure Team Finalises the protocol and communicates this to the Disclosure Team Updates the protocol, if applicable Files the protocol with IECs/IRBs and Health Authorities as per applicable regulations Prepares the registry posting and identifies protocol issues in terms of applicable registry business rules and identifies technical and editorial inconsistencies in the protocol Updates draft registry posting based on input received from Clinical Team Verifies feedback received is consistent with applicable registries business rules Updates registry posting and verifies final protocol meets business rules of applicable registries Submits to applicable registries Identifies non-compliance with registry business rules and requests changes to protocol Follows up on feedback received from registries Updates Informs company stakeholders of completed as per applicable SOP

Maintaining registry (Applicable updates to registries such as www.clinicaltrials.gov, etc) 2 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Team Update CTMS Registry updated Update CTMS 1 Registration of a clinical trial Disclosure Team Update applicable registries on a monthly basis No Change request from registry Yes Follow up on feed back from registry Inform Clinical Team, if any action is indicated Close registration process 3 Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Site Communicates a change, eg patients enrolled, etc LPLV, as per agreed communication channels

Managing protocol amendments & registry (Part 1) (Process described is a possible flow and should not be viewed as a mandatory process) 2 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Team Initiate protocol amendment Review draft update of registry posting for consistency with amended protocol & address requests for change* File amendment with IECs/ IRBs & HAs 1 Registration of a clinical trial Disclosure Team Prepare update to registry posting & verify protocol amendment meets business rules of applicable registries and identify technical and editorial issues in the amendment Verify final amendment text meets business rules of applicable registries No Final amendment meets business rules of registries Yes See next slide Responsibility and task assigned as per company SOP

Managing protocol amendments & registry (Part 2) (Process described is a possible flow and should not be viewed as a mandatory process) 2 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Clinical Team Update amendment, as per process on previous slide See previous slide Amendment requires update of registry No Identify noncompliance & request change(s) to amendment 2 Maintaining registry Disclosure Team Yes Submit to applicable registries Inform stakeholders Receive requests for amendments from registries Update posting Yes Impact on protocol? No Finalise

Maintaining registry 2 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Postings Disclosure of clinical trial results Responsible Party Clinical Team Disclosure Team Clinical Site Procedure Updates CTMS according to progress report from clinical sites Amend protocol, if applicable on feedback from Disclosure Team Updates registries with new information from clinical sites through CTMS Follow-up on feedback received from registries Assess impact of amendment on information disclosed on applicable registries Update registry entry, if applicable Communicate to Clinical Team change to registry following a protocol amendment Communicates progress on the study, eg number of patients enrolled and others Communicates LPLV via updates to CTMS (either through the monitor or by directly updating the CTMS)

Process flow maps: Results disclosure process

Disclosure of clinical trial results (structured/tabular outputs) (Managing disclosure of results on registries requiring structured/tabular outputs, eg www.clinicaltrials.gov) 3 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Data Management / Biometrics Prepare output as per business rules of registries Update outputs and resubmit to Disclosure Team 2 Maintaining registry Clinical Team By month 4 following LPLV: submit publication & results disclosure plans including timelines Review and approve outputs for medical & scientific integrity Disclosure Team Within 4 months of LPLV date request publication & results posting plans from Clinical Team Track timelines & verify whether plan is aligned with company policy & legal / registry requirements Review output for compliance with business rules of registries Request changes to output No Compliant with business rules Yes Review and approve output for compliance with business rules of registries Post on registries

Disclosure of clinical trial results as ICH E3 summaries (Managing disclosure of results on registries) 3 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results 2 Maintaining registry Clinical Team By month four following LPLV: submit publication & results disclosure plans including timelines Send ICH E3 summary of Clinical Study Report to Disclosure Update the ICH E3 summary as directed Request changes to ICH E3 summary to meet registries requirements Disclosure Team Within four months of LPLV date request publication & results posting plans from Clinical Team Track timelines & verify whether plan is aligned with company policy & legal registry requirements Review ICH E3 summary for compliance with business rules of registries No Compliant with business rules Yes Approve ICH E3 summary Post on registries

Disclosure of clinical trial results 3 Registration of a clinical trial Maintaining registry Disclosure of clinical trial results Responsible party Clinical Team Disclosure Team Data Management/ Biometrics Procedure Submit publication and results disclosure plans including timelines to Disclosure Team If applicable, send ICH E3 summary of clinical study report to Disclosure Team Update ICH E3 summary on feed back from Disclosure Team Review and approve output from Data Management for medical and scientific integrity Request publication and results posting plans from Clinical Team Track timelines and verify whether plan is aligned with company policy & legal/registries requirements Remind Clinical Team of timelines Review and approve output from data management for compliance with registry business rules Post output on applicable registry If applicable, review ICH E3 summary for compliance with business rules of applicable registry and If applicable, approve ICH E3 summary and post on applicable registry Prepare output as per business rules of applicable registries