Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

Similar documents
Financial Impacts of Net-Metered PV on Utilities and Ratepayers: A Scoping Study of Two Prototypical U.S. Utilities

Byron s First Community Owned Solar Garden brought to you by..

EXAMPLE TARIFF MID-SIZE COMMERCIAL

Solar Payback: Andrew Reddaway Alternative Technology Association. June 2014

SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR HOLLYWOOD RIVIERA HOMEOWNERS

EXAMPLE TARIFF DOMESTIC

Understanding Utility Revenue and Customer Tariffs Impact of DPV Deployment: Thailand Case Study

On Farm Power Generation Assessment of viability calculator

An End User Perspective on the Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Systems Installed by Commercial Organizations. Kenton D. Swift May 14, 2012

Value? Depends on who you are: The CSI Site

PASADENA WATER AND POWER MEMORANDUM. August 9, 2016

Peter Randall Solar Kingdom Ltd

Predicting PV Uptake in New Zealand SEANZ 2016 The Power Shift. Sharee McNab, Alan Wood, Scott Lemon, Allan Miller 18 November 2016

Business Models for Distributed RE Generation in Ghana with or without Net-Metering

VALUING ROOFTOP SOLAR

Legislatures, Energy Offices, and Public Utility Commissions: Roles, Jurisdictions, and Interactions

BENEFITS OF AN ENERGY COMMAND CENTER

Local Solar PV Systems Update

Mobilizing Electricity Companies to Implement Energy Efficiency

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Incentive Program. Shannon Ripley, Environmental Services

Delaware Electric Cooperative Generator Interconnection Application Long Form (For Use with Generators Greater than 100 kw)

BRE: Feed in tariff update Jonny Williams BRE Wales and South West. Part of the BRE Trust

Calculating A Nation s Economic Solar Potential General Methodology And Results For The United States

Demystifying Rooftop Solar

West Monroe Partners April 2017

Solar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly

ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications and the Arts

Angelica Salomon-Dealino & Dilip Limaye International Institute for Energy Conservation. Asian Development Bank, 19 June 2015

Home PV System Design

INCENTIVES FOR ROOFTOP RESIDENTIAL SOLAR PV

M.E. 523 M.E. 523 April 7, Renewable Energy and Green Power. Mike Richardson Manager, Renewable Energy Customer Programs

The CSI Site. Research Studies. Value? Depends on who you are: How to Determine the Value of a Solar Investment

RATE DS-4 LARGE GENERAL DELIVERY SERVICE

Briefing paper Solar Gardens

Dynamic Pricing Programs Focus on Peak-Time Rebate Programs

BIZ Solar Fort Collins ClimateWise Biz Ed Program Series

Rate Design: Part 2. Into the Weeds on Cost Allocation, Dynamic Pricing, Net Metering, and Alternatives

Residential Solar Energy Systems: Solar Hot Water and Solar PV. Darren C. Anderson, MSc Renewable Energy Director of Operations Sungrid Ltd

Energy and Climate Report

Support Schemes for PV in Europe

Traditional approach to modelling EE & DG

EVALUATION OF PSEG LONG ISLAND ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAMS. Presentation to LIPA Trustees REV Committee

Personal Action: Electricity. Special thanks to: John Bringenberg

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Green Energy and Good Jobs Initiative Presentation for City Council

SOLAR REPORT JANUARY 2018

Farm Energy IQ. Solar Energy on Farms. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Ed Johnstonbaugh, Penn State Extension

Fact sheet. Photovoltaic systems. Why consider photovoltaics?

Revised Overview of PV Inputs, Data Sources, and Potential Study Results

Economic Impact of a New Hampshire Renewable Portfolio Standard. University of New Hampshire Ross Gittell, Ph.D. Matt Magnusson, MBA 2/21/2007

MS ELISE KRISTEN BARRY BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL OF SUSTAINABILITY MURDOCH UNIVERSITY

Sustainable Energy Management Options for a Small Subdivision. Mandy Armstrong SB10 Conference 2010

VAT on battery storage integrated with domestic solar PV

Ohio RPS, EE and DR Mandates

FY2017 SREC Registration Program (SRP) Final As-Built Technical Worksheet Instructions Page 1

City of Carson City 3505 Butti Way Carson City, NV PUBLIC WORKS SOLAR PV SYSTEM PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AN ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY AND EMISSIONS PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS AT TEACHERS MUTUAL BANK LTD

Payback & Return Analysis for Solar in Mueller - Revision 1

Opportunities to Grow Small and Community Wind

SUBMISSION ON FEED-IN TARIFF FOR REGIONAL QUEENSLAND FOR March 2014.

Impact of localised Energy Efficiency (EE) and Renewable Energy (RE) on Ekurhuleni s finances over the next 10 years Report.

SECT ION BREAK DO NOT DELET E! Just text UTS: INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURES

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

DOE's ISO Superior Energy Performance Program: Driving Energy Efficiency and Productivity Initiatives at HARBEC. Bob Bechtold March 27, 2015

Setting the Energy Bid Floor

Solar Solutions for Schools. Solar Power Solutions for Schools

Solar Electric Investment Proposal

California s Approach to Designing a Net Energy Metering (NEM) Tariff. Sara Kamins California Public Utilities Commission June 18, 2014

Senate Bill 350 Study

Impact of localised Energy Efficiency (EE) and Renewable Energy (RE) on City of Cape Town s finances over the next 10 years Report.

Funding incentives for energy saving and micro-generation

Important contact details Our contact phone number and emergency number to call in case of energy faults or emergencies.

Resource and Financial Impact of Clean Line P&E HVDC Delivered Wind Resources for TVA

Introduction to Basic Solar Issues for the Brownfield Practitioner in Florida

Bundled Energy Solutions to Lower Operating Costs and Maximize ROI. Harvey Katzen Director of Bundled Energy Services ABM Building and Energy

FORECASTING PV MARKET ADOPTION AND DEMAND IMPACTS

Value of DER Implementation. ULI Electric Cities July 26, 2017 Stephen Wemple, Utility of the Future

Farm Energy IQ. Solar Energy on Farms. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Ed Johnstonbaugh, Penn State Extension

A TOOL TO MARKET CUSTOMER-SITED SMALL WIND SYSTEMS

Coenraad Pretorius Energy Engineer Anglo American South Africa

Coenraad Pretorius Energy Engineer Anglo American South Africa

PHOTOVOLTAICS AS AN ENERGY SERVICES TECHNOLOGY: A CASE STUDY OF PV SITED AT THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS HEADQUARTERS

Energy Efficiency Jennifer Heintz June 13, 2012,

Elmwood Golf Course Solar PV Initial Feasibility Study

Chevening Chat Series 4: REsolutions: Renewable Energy (RE) for Sustainable and Inclusive Development 20 January 2017; 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM at SEDA

EVOENERGY 2017/18 STATEMENT OF TARIFF CLASSES AND TARIFFS

I D E A E X C H A N G E U T I L I T Y AND C O M M U N I T Y C O N N E C T I O N. Denver Regional Council of Governments May 20, 2015

Harnessing the sun s energy to power our future.

Promoting the Use of GSHPs to Reduce Peak Demand and Improve Electric System Utilization

Energy Policy Briefing Protecting Consumers & The Climate May 19, 2015

Cost of Service and Public Policy. Ted Kury Director of Energy Studies, PURC

DC Surface (non-submersible) pumps are most economical. Reduce pumping energy by half

Solar Energy for Publicly Owned Treatment Works

Wind Energy. Evaluating the International Renewable Energy Market for the Creation of a Longstanding and Secure Energy Policy 12/29/10

PV SYSTEMS PREPARING & EDUCATING YOURSELF: - SITE, SYSTEM, ECONOMICS & EXPECTATIONS - GOVERNMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMS

Dynamic Price, Product and Messaging Specification

Power Saver TM Program

Transcription:

Page 1 of 6 Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, 2016 Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016 Class # of Projects Capacity (kw) Annual Energy (kwh) Class # of Projects Capacity (kw) Annual Energy (kwh) R 2,741 17,524 23,326,106 R 35 374 557,504 G 218 3,960 5,503,374 G 45 918 1,338,289 GV 31 713 1,479,814 GV - - - LG 6 99 214,839 LG - - - Total 2,996 22,295 30,524,132 Total 80 1,293 1,895,793 Large Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Large Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016 Class # of Projects Capacity (kw) Annual Energy (kwh) Class # of Projects Capacity (kw) Annual Energy (kwh) R - - - R - - - G - - - G 21 9,290 22,766,364 GV 5 882 1,158,948 GV - - - LG 1 120 157,680 LG - - - Total 6 1,002 1,316,628 Total 21 9,290 22,766,364 Notes Net Metered projects on-line as of 6/30/2016 were used to create an estimate of annual kwh produced. Solar PV projects were assumed to have a 15% capacity factor (using the Max AC rating of the project inverters). Non-PV projects were assumed to have a 30% capacity factor. 000031

Page 2 of 6 Lost Revenues related to Small Net Metering Projects Small Project Assumptions Customers bill reflects the avoidance of paying the full retail rate (all c/kwh charges) for 100% of KWH produced For R and G - 50% of the annual kwhs are consumed internally and is accounted as lost utility sales and revenues For R and G - the other 50% is exported to Eversource and is accounted as a purchased power expense at the full retail rate For GV and LG - 100% is accounted as lost sales and revenues and 0% is purchased power No impact on the utility collection of customer demand charges (i.e. $/kw charges) s (c/kwh) are those effective July 1, 2016 G lost revenues are 16% in block #1, 17% in block #2 and 67% in block #3 GV lost revenues are 100% in the first block (first 200,000 kwh) LG lost revenues are 100% in the On-Peak period The over-market payments for Energy Service are relative to an illustrative ISO-NE energy and capacity value of 5.0 cents per kwh (A) from Page 1 (B) = (A) x 50% or 100% s (c/kwh) Lost Revenues ($) = (B) x Payments Annual kwh Lost Sales kwh Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Total 10.95 vs 5.0 c/kwh R 23,326,106 11,663,053 4.207 2.39 0.094 0.33 490,665 278,747 10,963 38,488 818,863 693,952 G 5,503,374 2,751,687 Block #1 (first 500 kwh) 7.097 2.227 0.056 0.33 31,246 9,805 247 1,453 42,750 163,725 Block #2 (next 1,000 kwh) 1.758 0.838 0.056 0.33 8,224 3,920 262 1,544 13,949 Block #3 (all additional kwh) 0.622 0.449 0.056 0.33 11,467 8,278 1,032 6,084 26,862 GV 1,479,814 1,479,814 0.616 0.000 0.049 0.33 9,116 0 725 4,883 14,724 88,049 LG 214,839 214,839 0.516 0.000 0.061 0.33 1,109 0 131 709 1,949 12,783 Total 30,524,132 16,109,392 551,826 300,750 13,360 53,161 919,097 958,509 (C) = (A) - (B) (D) (E) = (C) x (D) (F) = (C) x 5.0 (G) = (E) - (F) Full Retail (c/kwh) includes Default Service at 10.95 c/kwh at 5.0 c/kwh ($) R 11,663,053 17.971 2,095,967 583,153 1,512,815 G 2,751,687 13.987 384,871 137,584 247,287 14,414,740 2,480,838 720,737 1,760,101 000032

Page 3 of 6 Lost Revenues related to Small Group Host Projects Small Group Host Project Assumptions Customer avoids the full retail rate (all c/kwh charges) for 20% of KWH produced Remaining 80% assumed "virtually shared" with Group Members and is recorded as a d expense at the full retail rate No impact on the utility collection of customer demand charges (i.e. $/kw charges) s (c/kwh) are those effective July 1, 2016 G lost revenues are 16% in block #1, 17% in block #2 and 67% in block #3 G d full retail rate assumes the same block proportions (16%, 17%, 67%) (A) from Page 1 (B) = (A) x 20% s (c/kwh) Lost Revenues ($) = (B) x Payments Annual kwh Lost Sales kwh Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Total 10.95 vs 5.0 c/kwh R 557,504 111,501 4.207 2.39 0.094 0.33 4,691 2,665 105 368 7,828 6,634 G 1,338,289 267,658 Block #1 (first 500 kwh) 7.097 2.227 0.056 0.33 3,039 954 24 141 4,158 15,926 Block #2 (next 1,000 kwh) 1.758 0.838 0.056 0.33 800 381 25 150 1,357 Block #3 (all additional kwh) 0.622 0.449 0.056 0.33 1,115 805 100 592 2,613 GV 0 0 0.616 0.000 0.049 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 LG 0 0 0.516 0.000 0.061 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,895,793 379,159 9,646 4,805 255 1,251 15,957 22,560 (A) (B) (C) = (A) x (B) (D) = (A) x 5.0 (E) = (C) - (D) Full Retail (c/kwh) includes Default Service at 10.95 c/kwh at 5.0 c/kwh ($) R 446,003 17.971 80,151 22,300 57,851 G 1,070,631 13.987 149,746 53,532 96,215 1,516,635 229,898 75,832 154,066 000033

Page 4 of 6 Lost Revenues related to Large Net Metering Projects Large Project Assumptions 90% of kwh produced is assumed to be consumed internally; 10% is exported through the meter Customers bill reflects the avoidance of paying the full retail rate (all c/kwh charges) for 90% of KWH produced 90% of the annual kwhs are consumed internally and is accounted as lost utility sales and revenues 10% is exported to Eversource and is accounted as a purchased power expense at the Default Energy Service rate No impact on the utility collection of customer demand charges (i.e. $/kw charges) s (c/kwh) are those effective July 1, 2016 GV lost revenues are 100% in the first block (first 200,000 kwh) LG lost revenues are 100% in the On-Peak period The over-market payments for Energy Service are relative to an illustrative ISO-NE energy and capacity value of 5.0 cents per kwh (A) from Page 1 (B) = (A) x 90% s (c/kwh) Revenues ($) Payments Annual kwh Lost Sales kwh Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Total 10.95 vs 5.0 c/kwh R 0 0 4.207 2.39 0.094 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 Block #1 (first 500 kwh) 7.097 2.227 0.056 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block #2 (next 1,000 kwh) 1.758 0.838 0.056 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 Block #3 (all additional kwh) 0.622 0.449 0.056 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 GV 1,158,948 1,043,053 0.616 0.000 0.049 0.33 6,425 0 511 3,442 10,378 62,062 LG 157,680 141,912 0.516 0.000 0.061 0.33 732 0 87 468 1,287 8,444 Total 1,316,628 1,184,965 7,157 0 598 3,910 11,666 70,505 (C) = (A) - (B) (D) (E) = (C) x (D) (F) = (C) x 5.0 (G) = (E) - (F) Default Service c/kwh at 5.0 c/kwh ($) GV 115,895 10.950 12,690 5,795 6,896 LG 15,768 10.950 1,727 788 938 131,663 14,417 6,583 7,834 000034

Page 5 of 6 Lost Revenues related to Large Group Host Projects Large Group Host Project Assumptions The vast majority of projects have essentially zero internal consumption, relative to the production capability of the resource Thus, lost revenues are zero. 100% of annual production earns a Group Host payment at the Default Energy Service rate These payments are recorded as d expenses at the Default Service rate (10.95 c/kwh) s (c/kwh) are those effective July 1, 2016 (A) from Page 1 (B) = (A) x 0% s (c/kwh) Revenues ($) Payments Annual kwh Lost Sales kwh Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Total 10.95 vs 5.0 c/kwh R 0 0 4.207 2.39 0.094 0.33 0 0 G 22,766,364 0 Block #1 (first 500 kwh) 7.097 2.227 0.056 0.33 0 0 Block #2 (next 1,000 kwh) 1.758 0.838 0.056 0.33 0 Block #3 (all additional kwh) 0.622 0.449 0.056 0.33 0 GV 0 0 0.616 0.000 0.049 0.33 0 0 LG 0 0 0.516 0.000 0.061 0.33 0 0 Total 22,766,364 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (C) = (A) - (B) (D) (E) = (C) x (D) (F) = (C) x 5.0 (G) = (E) - (F) Default Service c/kwh at 5.0 c/kwh ($) G 22,766,364 10.950 2,492,917 1,138,318 1,354,599 000035

Page 6 of 6 Lost Revenues ($) d Project Type # of Projects Capacity (kw) Annual Production kwh Lost Sales kwh d kwh Distribution Transmission Stranded Cost Systems Benefits Total Cost $ Small 2,996 22,295 30,524,132 16,109,392 14,414,740 551,826 300,750 13,360 53,161 919,097 2,718,610 Small Group Host 80 1,293 1,895,793 379,159 1,516,635 9,646 4,805 255 1,251 15,957 176,626 Large 6 1,002 1,316,628 1,184,965 131,663 7,157 0 598 3,910 11,666 78,339 Large Group Host 21 9,290 22,766,364 0 22,766,364 0 0 0 0 0 1,354,599 Total 3,103 33,880 56,502,917 17,673,516 38,829,401 568,629 305,555 14,213 58,323 946,719 4,328,174 000036

Exhibit RCL-RDJ-2 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT RCL/RDJ-2 SOLAR PV PRODUCTION PAY BACK SHEET Existing Tariff Proposed Tariff Project size (KW) 5.70 5.70 Cost ($/KW) $3,530 $3,530 TOTAL COST $20,133 $20,133 FED. TAX CREDIT ($6,040) ($6,040) STATE REBATE ($2,500) ($2,500) NET COST $11,593 $11,593 Assumed Capacity Factor 15% 15% Estimated Annual Production (KWH) 7,494 7,494 Avoided Electric (c/kwh) $0.180 $0.1095 Electric Bill Savings per year $1,347 $821 Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs/yr) 7 7 REC Market Value ($/REC) $25.00 $25.00 REC Revenue per year ($) $175 $175 TOTAL Bill Savings & REC Revenue ($) $1,522 $996 YEARS PAYBACK 7.6 11.6 Year #1 Return of Investment (%) 13% 9% 000037