Standard Animal Weights

Similar documents
Agronomy Facts 54 Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38): Who Is Affected?

Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38):

State Conservation Commission Act 38 Updates

Table 1: Nutrient Unit Livestock Information. Summary of Revisions to Table 1 of the Nutrient Management Tables

Tab 1a. Pigs Data Entry and Assumptions (April 26, 2018)

U.S. EPA s Responses to Pennsylvania s Documentation on Manure Management Plans Use of Book Values March 10, 2017

Manure Production and Management Record Keeping Forms

ANIMAL SCIENCE Merit Badge Requirements

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

dairy cattle, Breed Tell their principal uses and merits. Tell where the breeds originated.

Potential Process to Update Manure Generation Data for Phase 6 Model. April 19 th, 2018

National standards for nutrient contents in manure

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS 1) GUIDE FOR NEW NON-AGRICULTURAL USES ADJACENT TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS II) GUIDE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING LIVESTOCK FACILITIES AND/OR MANURE STORAGES

ANIMAL SCIENCE BYU PowWow Official Merit Badge Worksheet

Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE

Municipalities and the Agricultural Operation Practices Act (AOPA)

Agricultural Best Management Practices for Watershed Protection and Restoration. Citizens Advisory Council June 17, 2014

Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans

How to Write a. (519)

ANNEX 5: Animals and Animal products

2008 No. 196 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. The Nitrates Action Programme (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2008

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

e-cfr Data is current as of June 27, 2014

UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS

June Area: Sections G K

Tech Manual Update Bulletin

"Closure plan" means the plan approved by the Division for clean up and closure of the AFO and associated waste storage and disposal facilities.

Horses, donkeys and ducks: identifying key trends in other livestock and poultry

CHAPTER 91. GENERAL PROVISIONS ****

Phosphorus Requirements of Different Species, Phytase Feeding, and Ration Formulation

The Agricultural Operations Regulations

AA22 Animal Science II Unit C Animal Management

Basic Livestock Needs In Tennessee. Beginning Farmer Workshop

STATE OF MINNESOTA. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. FACT SHEET for the

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

a) Vision To be the preferred animal feeds manufacturer and supplier in Kenya.

Holmes Co Mg CFU per ha

Natural fertiliser control and application system in Poland state of the art. The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

Chenango County 4-H Livestock Project Record


British Columbia Manure and Crop Nutrients

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Used hormones to regulate plant growth.

2013 Increment Report Refresher

Overseer nutrient budget year 2001/02

Still Out of Balance:

EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK AND MANURE MANAGEMENT

SEVERANCE PROPOSAL FORM

VOC CO 2 CH 4 N 2O. Viable particles. Increasing diversity. Broilers. Pigs. Cattle. Each source type may be outside barn to varying degrees.

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Introduction. Fertiliser. Lime. Slurry and Manure

Cattle and Hog Outlook 2010 and Beyond. John D. Lawrence Extension Livestock Economist Iowa State University

Animal breeding in Latvia

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Produced by Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, 2018

Linking Epidemic & Economic Modeling An Economic Perspective. Bruce McCarl Amy Hagerman Presentation to FAZD Modeling Group Jan 31, 2008

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Extension. Establishing a Fair Pasture Rental Rate

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP): Wyoming

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD. Sofia 1040, blvd. Hristo Botev 55 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN 2010

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

ANIMAL DOMESTICATION

AgriStability GUIDE FOR REPORTING PRODUCTIVE UNITS FOR 2013

STATE OF MINNESOTA. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. FACT SHEET for the STATE OF MINNESOTA GENERAL ANIMAL FEEDLOT PERMIT. Permit Number MNG450000

The Rules and Regulations for Water Quality Control, Chapter September 15, 2003

APPENDIX D CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION REGULATIONS

{ } Introduction to. Livestock

No-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management

PRICES OF COMMODITY PRODUCTS

Subchapter D. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

L I V E S T O C K. Alberta Livestock Industry in Table No.

Healthy Rangelands. Grazing. Management Adjustments for

Soil Fertility Management for Forage Crops: Maintenance

DPC Odor Management On The Farm

PLANT ENTERPRISES PRODUCTION

I N S T R U C T I O N S For Completion of the NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBTAIN PERMIT COVERAGE

Part A required assignment for all participants

Student Name: Teacher: Date: District: Robeson. Assessment: 9_12 Agriculture AU10 - Agriscience Applications Test 2. Objective Animal Science

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

PLANT ENTERPRISES PRODUCTION

Tools to Help Beef Cattle Producers Make Economically Sound Restocking Decisions

Alberta Alberta is proud to provide safe, consistent, high-quality agriculture and food products for consumers around the world.

Economic Impact of Agriculture in Lethbridge County. Lethbridge County

AgriStability Agri-Québec Plus

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

Prepared by University of Missouri Commercial Agriculture Program

National Organic Standards Board Livestock Committee Animal Welfare Discussion Document Stocking Density. September 9, 2010

Farm registration and movement of farm livestock

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

Dairy, Manure and AFO/CAFO 101. Karl Czymmek PRO-DAIRY Program Cornell University Black River Watershed

INTENSIVE LIVESTOCK, DAIRY, POULTRY FACILITIES

PILOT STUDIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINKING IACS AND

2019 IBA ANNUAL AGRICULTURAL CONFERENCE

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, 2008

Recommendations to Estimate Swine Nutrient Production in the Phase 6 Watershed Model

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

Module 2 Planning Your Water System. For more information refer to the Water Wells That Last video (Part I Planning and Construction).

Transcription:

Standard Animal Weights Agricultural Advisory Board April 27, 2017 Frank X. Schneider Director, Nutrient and Odor Management Programs

Background Staff would like to update the AAB on changes to the Standard Animal Weights that are utilized in the Act 38 Nutrient Management Program. Staff is seeking a recommendation from the AAB to the State Conservation Commission (SCC). The current animal weights that are used in the Act 38 Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) program were developed in 2010. The original animal weights were published in 1997 for Act 6. In 2007, a revision was made for Act 38. In 2010, the weights were again revised to better reflect current Pennsylvania agriculture.

Regulations 83.262 (a) (1) (i) of the Act 38 regulations state: Compute the animal weight for the agricultural operation by multiplying the average number of animals on the agricultural operation by the standard animal weight used by the livestock industry in this Commonwealth. The standard weights contained in guidance published by the Commission may be used to meet this requirement. Other animal weights may be used in place of those in the Commission guidance, if there is sufficient documentation to support their use. For those animal types not included in the Commission guidance, the average animal weight for the operation shall be used for this calculation, taking into account, if applicable, the range of animal weights throughout the time the animals are on the operation.

Public Comment In September 2016, the SCC approved a 60-day public comment period on the draft standard animal weights and animal grouping. On October 28, 2016 SCC staff released the draft for public comment and also briefed the NMAB and the DEP AAB. The comment period ended December 30, 2016.

Public Comment The public comment announcement asked for the following: 1. Comments on the draft weights. 2. Comments on the animal grouping. 3. When should the changes become effective? 4. How will the new animal weights be brought into existing Nutrient Management Plans (NMPs)? 5. How will the new animal weights be brought into existing Concentrated Animal Operation (CAO) / Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) calculations that show someone is not a CAO / CAFO? 6. How will these new weights and agronomy facts 54 be rolled out?

Public Comment The SCC received 84 comments from 25 commentators. Based off the comments received, we asked the PSU species specialists to review the draft again and make final adjustments. Changed have occurred.

Proposed Dairy - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs.) during Production (range) Dairy Holstein/Brown Swiss Cow 1,3001450 Heifer: 1 2 yr. 900 1000 (650 1,150 750 1250) Calf: 0 1 yr. 375 420 (100 650 90 750) Bull 1,500 1700 Guernsey/Ayrshire Cow 1,100 1200 Heifer: 1 2 yr. 800 865 (575 1,025 630 1100) Calf: 0 1 yr. 338 350 (100 575 70 630) Bull 1,250 1600 Jersey Cow 900 1000 Heifer: 1 2 yr. 600 675 (400 800 500 850) Calf: 0 1 yr. 225 (50 400500) Bull 1,000 1200

Proposed Swine - Slight change, compared to 2010 version Swine Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs.) during Production (range) Nursery pig 350 (13 5 5745) Wean to finish 1430 (13 5-27365) Grow finish 165 5 (57 45 27365) Gestating sow 4500 Sow and litter 470 Boar 450

Poultry (Layer) - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs.) during Production (range) Poultry Layer: 18 65 75 wk. 3.103.13 (2.752.82 3.453.44) Layer: 18 105 90 wk. 3.153.14 (2.82 3.46) weighted avg. Layer, brown egg: 20 65 18-75 wk. 3.8 3.85 (3.3-4.3 3.35 4.34) Layer, brown egg: 20 105 18-90 wk. 4.00 3.85 (3.3-4.7 3.35 4.34) Pullet: 0 18 16 wk. 1.421.38 (0.08 2.752.67) Pullet, brown egg: 0 16 wk. 1.54 (0.08 3.0) Layer, white egg breeder hen: 17-70 wk. 3.25 (2.7 3.8) Layer, white egg breeder rooster: 17-70 wk. 4.37 (3.67 5.06) Layer, brown egg breeder hen: 17-70 wk. 3.55 (2.9 4.2) Layer, brown egg breeder rooster: 17-70 wk. 5.05 (4.5 5.06)

Poultry (Broiler) - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Broiler, large: 0 53 days 3.03.5 (0.09 6.07.0) Broiler, medium: 0 35 days 2.32.5 (0.09 4.55.0) Roaster, male: 0 7 wk. 4.7 (0.09 9.3) Roaster, female: 0 9 wk. 4.9 (0.09 9.8) Broiler, breeder pullet: 0-20 wk. 2.55 (0.09 5.0) Broiler, breeder cockerel: 0-20 wk. 3.55 (0.09 7.0) Broiler, breeder hen: 20-65 wk. 6.75 (5.0 8.5) Broiler, breeder rooster: 20-65 wk. 8.75 (7.0 10.5)

Poultry (Turkey) - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Turkey, tom brooder: 0-6 wk. 3.36 (0.22 6.5) Turkey, hen brooder: 0-6 wk. 2.74 (0.22 5.25) Turkey, tom: 60 18 wk. 20.025.25 (6.50. 12 4044) Turkey, hen regular: 60 12 wk. 7.111.13 (5.250.12 1417) Turkey, hen heavy: 6-16 wk. 14.63 (5.25 24)

Poultry (Duck) - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Duck, starter: 0 1743 days 1.363.56 (0.22 2.5 11 7) Duck, finisher: 17-38 days 4.88 (2.5 7.25) Duck, developer: 0-196 days 3.21 (0.22 6.2) Duck, layer 6.85 (6.2 7.5)

Poultry (Other) - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Guinea, growing: 0 14 to 24 wk. 1.9 (0.06 3.75) Guinea, mature 3.75 Pheasant, growing: 0 13 to 43 wk. 1.53 (0.05 3.0) Pheasant, mature 3.0 Chukar, growing: 0 13 to 43 wk. 0.52 (0.04 1.0) Chukar, mature 1.0 Quail, growing: 0 13 to 43 wk. 0.26 (0.02 0.5) Quail, mature 0.5

Beef - Slight change, compared to 2010 version Beef Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Calf: 0 8 mo. 300 (100 500) Backgrounding Cattle 500 (300 700) Finishing: 8 24 mo. 950 (500 1400) Replacement Heifer: 8 mo.-1 yr. 500 (300 700) Replacement Heifer: 1-2 yr. 875 (700 1050) Cow 1400 Bull 1500

Veal - Slight change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Veal Calf: 0 20 wk. 280 (95 465)

Sheep and Goats - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Larger Breed Sheep Lamb: 0 1 yr. 85 (10 180) Ewe 225 Ram 300 Medium Breed Sheep Lamb: 0 1 yr. 80 (10 150) Ewe 175 Ram 225 Smaller Breed Sheep Lamb: 0 1 yr. 45 (10 80) Ewe 100 Ram 125 Meat Goats Kid: 0 1 yr. 65 (5 125) Doe 150 Buck 200 Dairy Goats Kid: 0 1 yr. 45 (5 85) Doe 125 Buck 170

Equine - no change, compared to 2010 version

Bison - Significant change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Bison Calf: 0 1 yr. 275 (50 500) Yearling 1-2 yr. 650 (500 800) Cow 1000 Bull 1600

Deer - No change, compared to 2010 version Deer Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Fawn: 0-6 mo. 36 (7 65) Yearling Doe: 6-18 mo. 95 (65 125) Yearling Buck: 6-18 mo. 110 (65 155) Mature Doe 145 Mature Buck 200

Alpaca and Llama - Slight change, compared to 2010 version Type of Animal Standard Weight (lbs..) during Production (range) Alpaca Young 80 (15 145) Mature Female 145 Mature Male 170 Llama Cria: 0-1 yr. 75 (25-125) Yearling: 1-2 yr. 213 (125 300) Mature 350

Roll Out / Implementation The SCC will publish the revised Standard Animal Weights and groupings table in the PA Bulletin, as soon as practical, after the SCC approves. Agronomy Fact Sheet 54 will be updated and published. New Standard Weights will be updated in the Growing Animal Weight Calculator section of the NMP spreadsheet. 1. That NMP spreadsheet will be version 6.0. 2. NMP Spreadsheet 6.0 is proposed to be released in October 2017 and then must be used for all CY 2019 NMP and beyond (until replaced by the next version). 3. This release timing matches with the NM Technical Manual timing.

Roll Out / Implementation A commercial Nutrient Management Specialist (NMS) must perform a CAO calculation that will be verified by a delegated conservation district or the SCC. Delegated CD s can perform preliminary or draft CAO calculations but when it is determined that an operator is close to the CAO threshold, a commercial NMS needs to be brought in to perform the actual calculation that will then be reviewed by the delegated CD or SCC.

Roll Out / Implementation Newly Identified CAOs Note: we need to follow the regulations at (83.261. General.) (1) (iii) For new operations defined as CAOs and commencing before October 1, 2006, a plan shall have been submitted prior to commencement of operations. (3) Operations that become defined as CAOs after October 1, 2006, due to expansion of an existing operation or loss of rented or leased land. Existing operations that make changes to their operations that result in becoming defined as CAOs for the first time after October 1, 2006, shall meet the following: (i) An agricultural operation which becomes a CAO after October 1, 2006, due to loss of land suitable for manure application, shall submit a plan within 6 months after the date which the operation becomes a CAO. An agricultural operation which will become a CAO due to expansion of operations by the addition of animals shall obtain approval of the plan prior to the expansion. (4) New operations. A new operation which will commence after October 1, 2006, and which will be a CAO, shall obtain approval of a plan meeting the requirements of this subchapter prior to the commencement of the operation.

Roll Out / Implementation Newly Identified CAOs Due to Weight Changes Only The NEW Standard WEIGHTS will become effective on October 1, 2019 (Start of Crop Year 2020) It may be necessary to provide two CAO calculations. 1. The 1 st CAO calculation will provide the AEU/Ac calculation prior to the release of the new standard weights. If this CAO calculation show a CAO, the operator must follow previous guidance. 2. The 2 nd CAO calculation will provide the AEU/Ac with the new standard weights. Once the operation is confirmed to be a CAO, that CAO will have 2 crop years from that date to have an approved NMP. These CAOs will need to have Crop Year 2020 NMPs Plan approval before October 1, 2019, so plan should be submitted for review in June/July 2019 Note this is a 2 year roll out from when SCC approves weights until plan should be submitted for review and 2 1/12 years from weight approval until plan must be approved.

Roll Out / Implementation Existing CAOs and CAFOs New weights will be brought into the NMP when the NMP is due to be amended. This amendment may be at the triennial review or sooner, if one of the amendment criteria ( triggers ) are met before the triennial review. Note that the 10% increase in AEUs trigger, for this standard weight update only, is merely for an expansion (addition) of animals and not based off the new standard animal weights until the triennial review time. This would allow a 3-year phase in period for existing CAOs and CAFOs

Roll Out / Implementation New CAFOs The NEW Standard WEIGHTS will become effective on October 1, 2019 (Start of Crop Year 2020) If the CAFO is also a CAO, they will follow the CAO Guidance: - The newly defined CAFO will be required to have an approved CAFO permit by the time that the new animal weights become effective (October 1, 2019). - This requirement will necessitate that the newly defined CAFO submit an administratively complete CAFO permit application by April 1, 2019.

Roll Out / Implementation New VAO CAFOs If a newly defined Voluntary Animal Operation (VAO) CAFO, Once the operation is confirmed to be a CAFO, using the NEW Standard Animal Weights, that CAFO will have up to 2 crop years to have an approved NMP and CAFO permit. The newly defined CAFO will be required to have an approved CAFO permit by the time that the new animal weights become effective (October 1, 2019). This requirement will necessitate that the newly defined CAFO submit an administratively complete CAFO permit application by April 1, 2019. Note this is a 2 year roll out from when SCC approves weights until plan should be submitted for review and 2 1/2 years from when the revised weights were approved by the SCC until the NMP must be approved.

Questions