Water Treatment Plant Startup Issues and Considerations

Similar documents
OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE : OPTIMISATION OF A NEW PACKAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Melina Entwistle. North East Water Authority

PNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

Ready, Set, and Go: Deer Valley WTP East Basins Performance Testing, Start-Up, and Commissioning Toby Teegerstrom Brian Watson

Drinking Water Audit Report

Heavy Metals Removal

Seasonal Source Water Quality and Treatment Challenges Town of Newburgh s Chadwick Lake Filtration Plant

Submerged Membranes to Replace Media Filters to Increase Capacity 4X for a Small Community. Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering, Inc.

Disinfection By-Products Reduction and SCADA Evaluation and WTP Sludge Removal System and Dewatering Facility

There is no sludge treatment process at NWTP. Sludge generated from sedimentation and backwashing is drained directly to the Khan River.

Measure against Algae Bloom in Bangkhen WTP - Optimum chemical dosing rate for Aulacoseira spp. removal -

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Iron/Manganese Package Plant Pre-Engineered Ground Water Treatment. Village of Bolivar, NY

SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPTIMIZATION

SIMPLE SOLUTIONS TO MANGANESE PROBLEMS. Jeff Roscoe. North East Region Water Authority

Trident. Package Water Treatment System

Rueter-Hess Water Purification Facility

TARCUTTA TREATMENT PLANT IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL. Peter Outtrim. Riverina Water County Council

Comparing the Leopold Clari-DAF System to Upflow Contact Clarification

Do Son Water Treatment Plant Hai Phong, Vietnam

COWRA S WATER TREATMENT PLANT - A CHANGE IN PROCESS CONTROL PHILOSOPHY. Ken Keliher. Cowra Council

13. High Rate Filtration Process

Innovative Improvements to a 53-Year Old Water Plant for HABs, Crypto, and Whatever Else the Maumee River Brings

Disinfection By-Products Reduction and SCADA Evaluation and WTP Sludge Removal System and Dewatering Facility

Government Center Water Treatment Plant Kamphaeng Phet Province, Thailand

Ferric Sulfate Success Story - OWASA s Switch to Ferric Sulfate Leads to a Reduction in Disinfection Byproducts

WRF Webcast Minimizing Waste Backwash Water from a Biological Denitrification Treatment System (project #4470)

Side by Side Piloting of Process Alternatives Yields Direct Performance Comparison

OPERATORS FRIEND, STREAMING CURRENT DETECTOR. Shane Dunne. Cassowary Coast Regional Council

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LECTURE 3: WATER TREATMENT MISS NOR AIDA YUSOFF

Amherst, MA, Drinking Water System

Well Water Quality Update and Next Steps. Public Works Commission Meeting April 17,

Dipti Shah, Town of Gilbert Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Removal of Manganese by Microfiltration in a Water Treatment Plant*

Meeting Manganese Removal Goals: A Pilot Study

Enhanced Research Using RCF For Cr(VI) Removal. MWD FAF Technical Conference February 23, 2017

Utility Partner Data Report

Water Treatment Plant Phase 1 Upgrades CMAR Selection Pre-Submittal Meeting

Drinking Water Audit Report

Valve Nest Filter with Time Clock Control Installation and Operation Manual

BARRABA WATER SUPPLY. Construction of Split Rock Dam Pipeline and Ancillary Works

Zero Liquid Discharge Project Extends Potable Water Supplies

Optimizing the Ballasted Sedimentation Process at the Anacortes Water Treatment Plant Jeff Marrs Plant Manager Greg Pierson - HDR

Lake County WTP Improvements and Capacity Increase. OTCO 9 th Annual Water and Wastewater Workshop. Nick Pizzi Aqua Serv

Process Instruments (UK) Ltd.

City of Enderby Water Treatment Plant

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

PUR-1241 ADDENDUM NO. 2 INVITATION TO BID GREENSAND FILTER SYSTEM AT ELK RIDGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

DRAFT July 26, Engineer s Report Water Softening Alternatives for Boyack Road Water Treatment Plant. Town of Clifton Park, New York

Challenges in Municipal Water Treatment and the MIOX Solution. Part 2 of 3: Groundwater Treatment

OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE FLAT WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Tony Humphries. Tony Humphries, Operator, SEQ Water

The city of Venice hired Camp

Membrane Technology: From Manufacture to. May Production

Nakhon Sawan Water Treatment Plant Nakhon Sawan, Thailand

Using Zeta Potential To Optimize Coagulation For Direct Filtration & Conventional Treatment: The Green River Filtration Facility Experience

FROM RAW WATER INTAKE TO DISTRIBUTION NETWORK: THE JOURNEY OF DBP CONTROL

Beginning the Treatment Journey

Introduction document of KHN package water treatment. plant (flocculation sedimentation and filtration)

Challenges in Municipal Water Treatment and the MIOX Solution

Maintenance of Drip Drip Irrigation Systems. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist University of Missouri Extension

Cau Nguyet Water Treatment Plant Hai Phong, Vietnam

SRO70 Installation Manual

NELSONVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS

ACTIFLO Process For Drinking Water Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Utility Partner Data Report

DBP Reduction and SCADA Improvements at the SGWASA Water Treatment Plant

USE OF CHEMICALS TO CONTROL ODORS AND CORROSION IN WASTEWATER SYSTEMS

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

MWUA 92 nd Annual February Meeting & Trade Show

MAKING THE SWITCH FROM LIME TO MEMBRANE SOFTENING: WHEN IS IT THE RIGHT TIME? Introduction

AQUAVENDOR AUTO. Ultrafiltration Unit SETUP OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS

Greater Kegalle Water Treatment Plant Kegalle, Sri Lanka

Balancing Microbial Control and Stage 2 DBP Rule Compliance (at Ocean City, Maryland)

OPERATOR DUTIES WEEDKDAY SHIFT

INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION EQUIPMENT LWS Filter Series

Partnership for Safe Water. Phase III Self-Assessment Template

Understanding Pretreatment. WesTech Engineering, Inc. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Hetch Hetchy Treatability at the Sunol Valley Water Treatment Plant

CLARENCE COLLIERY WATER TREATMENT

PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL: TREATMENT

STREAMING CURRENT MONITOR FOR COAGULANT OPTIMIZATION IN WATER TREATMENT PLANTS - LAP EXPERIENCE

Benchmarking Case Studies for Water and Wastewater Facilities

A Flight Plan for Success: Practical Aspects of Pilot Testing in Planning, Design and Optimization

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Liquid Phase Carbon Adsorption Checklist

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Benchmarking, Metrics Assessments, and Gap Analyses for Water and Wastewater

Drinking Water Audit Report

Jar Testing Methodology. 21 st, 22 nd, 23 rd March 2017 Location: Various.

TTHM Reduction Corrective Action Update 1 st Progress Meeting October 18, Robert Horvat, P.E x1501

Draft Technical Memorandum

16th Annual Surface Water Meeting October 21& 22, 2013

Overview Increased Increased federal emphasis emphasis on on filter filter performance Virginia s emphasis emphasis on

selection of EDR desalting technology rather than MF/RO for the City of San Diego water reclamation project

WATER FILTRATION EQUIPMENT LWF Series Commercial Water Filters

Section 8. Recommended Treatment Process and Cost Estimates. 8. Recommended Treatment. Process and Cost Estimates

Access manuals, spec sheets and additional educational materials for foodservice water treatment at our website.

WEFTEC.06. Lake Okeechobee, Actiflo, peroxone, surface water, Cyanobacteria

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Fuzzy Filter: The Right Path for Graton Community Services District

Transcription:

Water Treatment Plant Startup Issues and Considerations Joe Guistino, Coastside County Water District Aileen Kondo, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants California-Nevada Section AWWA Annual Fall Conference 2 October 2013 Sacramento, California

Presentation Overview Project Background DCWTP Improvements Startup Issues and Operational Challenges Current DCWTP Performance and Operations Summary

Project Background Nunes WTP Denniston Creek WTP Water purchased from SFPUC Local surface water Crystal Springs Reservoir Pilarcitos Reservoir Pilarcitos Well Field, - ground water under the influence of surface water (Pilarcitos Creek)

Original DCWTP Treatment Process

Project Driver: Treat Used DC Water Permit treating unused portion of Denniston Creek water rights and reduce amount of water purchase from City High source water tubidity (>15 NTU) Unmanageable backwash frequencies Local water passed to ocean unused

Project Driver: Upgrade of Old Facility Upgrade aging facilities (original DCWTP constructed in 1971) Unreliable high lift station Manual controls Aging chemical feel system No solids handling facility Pipeline failure in 2010

Original DCWTP

Original High Lift Pumps

Original Flash Mixer

Aging Chemical Facilities Alum Tank Permanganate Tank Caustic Soda Pumps Chemical Leak Polymer System

Pipeline Failure

Project Objectives Restore capacity to 1,000 gpm and enable realizing up to 250 MG/year production Enable treating raw water turbidity up to 50 NTU Enable processing of spent washwater and larger volume of solids Improve water treatment plant operation and reliability Upgrade high lift source water pumps Upgrade chemical storage and feed systems Provide automated controls

Upgraded DCWTP Treatment Process

Denniston Creek Pump Station

Pretreatment System

WWR and Solids Handling Facilities

Chemical Systems

Upgraded DCWTP

DCWTP Startup 30 31 17 18 400 gpm Test 22 23 24 25 700 gpm Test 31 1 1,000 gpm Test 2

Raw Water Pump Startup Raw water pump discharge not reach plant at startup Raw water was discharging back into wet well due to pressure relief valve setting Check valve setting, in addition to valve positions before startup

Startup Testing Turbidity Date Test Alum Dose (mg/l) Average Turbidity (NTU) RW Coag. W Cl. W FW 1/22 400 gpm 17-27 5.4 9.6 4.3 0.06-0.10 1/23 700 gpm 20-26 6.2 9.8 7.3 0.06-0.09 1/24 700 gpm 19-26 6.5 10.9 5.9 0.05-0.07 1/25 700 gpm 6-10 5.6 8.8 3.7 0.42-0.53 1/31 1,000 gpm ~5 4.7 6.4 1.4 0.16-0.16 2/1 1,000 gpm ~5 5.5-1.0 0.05-0.06

Contact Clarifier Performance Purpose of contact clarifiers is to reduce turbidity ahead of filters Applied coagulant dose of ~13-27 mg/l too high clarified water turbidity (~4-7 NTU) Reduced coagulant dose to ~5 mg/l significant reduction in clarified water turbidity (~1-2 NTU) With contact clarifiers, lower coagulant dose is more effective for some operating conditions.

Startup Testing Turbidity Date Test Alum Dose (mg/l) Average Turbidity (NTU) RW Coag. W Cl. W FW 1/22 400 gpm 17-27 5.4 9.6 4.3 0.06-0.10 1/23 700 gpm 20-26 6.2 9.8 7.3 0.06-0.09 1/24 700 gpm 19-26 6.5 10.9 5.9 0.05-0.07 1/25 700 gpm 6-10 5.6 8.8 3.7 0.42-0.53 1/31 1,000 gpm ~5 4.7 6.4 1.4 0.16-0.16 2/1 1,000 gpm ~5 5.5-1.0 0.05-0.06

Oxidation Issues: Manganese Observed black precipitate in chlorine analyzer indication of manganese passing through filters Yellow water complaints in the neighborhood Measured manganese concentrations Raw water manganese ~0.135 mg/l Treated water manganese ~0.165 mg/l Normal treated water manganese ~0.01-0.02 mg/l Performed permanganate soak of greensand filters and added potassium permanganate feed point ahead of filters Adsorbed manganese can release from filter media if redox condition is not sustained.

Oxidation Issues: Iron High iron levels observed in raw water (1 mg/l) Increased potassium permanganate dose to oxidized iron (0.5 mg/l 0.8 mg/l) Observed floc formation in jar test Oxidizing ferrous iron (Fe +2 ) to ferric iron (Fe +3 ) provides free (no cost) iron coagulation (1 mg Fe +3 = 3 mg FeCl 3 ).

Washwater Recovery Treatment objective is to reduce recycle water turbidity to less than 2 NTU Bulk of solids dropping off in WWR basin #1 with jet inlet stream in circular basin Great performance initially but not consistent

Controls System Third party SCADA system programmer Pros: Owner has greater control over system controls; easier to make future changes Cons: Additional level of coordination Contact clarifier system supplier responsible for coagulant and coagulant aid feed rate controls Requiring pretreatment system PLC to control chemical doses can be restrictive.

Nice-to-haves Identified during Startup Hose spigots for wash down in contact clarifier area Manual shutoff valves before automatic valves on bulk chemical tanks Additional chemical injection points and sample ports Algae removal ahead of contact clarifiers

Current DCWTP Operation and Performance Improved filter runs and reduced washwater generation with contact clarifier pretreatment Switched from Alum to PACl Longer filter runs Lower chemical use (replaces alum and cationic polymer) Less solids production DCWTP temporarily shut down during summer due to current low source water availability Work on optimizing iron oxidation when DCWTP returns online Still yet to observe performance of contact clarifiers under high source water turbidity conditions (raw water turbidity has been between 5-10 NTU since startup)

Summary Pressure contact clarifier pretreatment significantly reduces coagulant use, improves filter runs, and reduces generation of spent washwater in a small footprint Add oxidant immediately ahead of greensand filters to prevent desorption of manganese into filtered water Oxidation of iron in raw water forms trivalent coagulant aid If have proprietary control system for treatment process, be sure to make arrangements to enable modifications if needed PACl greatly reduces chemical use and generation of solids

Acknowledgments Coastside County Water District David Dickson Sean Donovan Don Patterson Matt Damrosch John Davis Kennedy/Jenks Craig Thompson Joel Faller Joe Drago Roberts Filter Group Mike Gregg Andre Kumar Razeek

Questions? AileenKondo@KennedyJenks.com JGuistino@CoastsideWater.org