Copyright GCI, LLC Remediation of Legacy Medical Devices

Similar documents
ASQ Tappan Zee Section Medical Devices, New Regulations and Standards. 26 th September / V. Fischer / Rev. 01

ISO 13485:2016 Medical Devices-Quality Management Systems- Requirements for Regulatory Purposes. Theresa McCarthy

Post Market Surveillance

Technical documentation. Capita Selecta proposed MDR

The New EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) An Active Device Lifecycle Approach Implementation and Remediation Activities

Combination Products Part 4 Compliance and Implementation at multi-site Network

2 DAY WORKSHOP on Preparing For The New EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR)

2 DAY WORKSHOP on Preparing For The New EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR)

EU MDR: Tips for Effectively Addressing the New Requirements

AAMI Quality Systems White Paper: Comparison of 21 CFR Part 820 to ISO 13485:2016 1

Technical Documentation

PDPServices. Medical Device Design Solutions. Whitney Moore, Director of Program Development. Aaron Lee, Manager of Quality and Regulatory

MEDICAL DEVICE. Technical file.

Ready or Not: The New Medical Device Regulations Are Here!

GETTING READY FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATION (MDR)

New EU Medical Device Regulations.are you ready? Angela Stokes Senior Director Regulatory Affairs March 2017

Auditing Within the Culture of the Medical Device Industry & ISO 13485:2016 Overview. ASQ Quality Conference 2017 for Region 5 October 25, 2017

Post market Surveillance ISO EU Medical Device Regulation

FDA 21 CFR Part 820 vs. ISO 13485:2016 Comparison Table created by greenlight.guru

Left to Our Own Devices Design Control & Risk Management Strategies for Combination Products

EU MDR Deep Dive: GSPRs, Technical Docs, PMS. 19 JUNE 2018 ASQ RAPS MASSMEDIC Waltham Woods

Medical Device Communiqué

Impact of the MD/IVD Regulations on Quality Management Systems

AAMI Quality Systems White Paper

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CUSTOM-MADE MEDICAL DEVICES

8 Steps towards EU-MDR implementation

GS1 Ireland Healthcare User Group (HUG) Information Day

Rocky Mountain Regulatory Affairs Society. Elements of and Maintenance/Remediation of the Design History File (DHF) March 15, 2017

Bridging gaps: medical device directive vs regulation. Geert Corstens 1 November 2018

Panel Discussion: European Medical Device Regulations Preparing for the Storm Moderator: Lenita Y. Sims Spears, Senior Quality Consultant/Senior

MedDev Rev 4 Medical Devices Regulation. Clinical Evidence Requirements Key Changes and Clarifications. Alan Eller 21 March 2017

EU MDR 10 Things Packaging Engineers Should Know

The Complete Guide to FDA Design Controls

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS DURING ELECTRO-MEDICAL DEVICE MARKET ACCESS

Design Quality. Indu Lakshman

Medical Device Directive

ISO and UAV Audits Preparation and Client Rights

ZOLL Document Number: 90E0004 Page 5 of 15 Maintenance of Quality Records

CO-ORDINATION OF NOTIFIED BODIES PPE Regulation 2016/425 RECOMMENDATION FOR USE

Regulations governing the application of medical accelerators

TRAINING CATALOG WINTER SPRING 2018

PART 1 DEVICE MASTER FILE

Effects of the European MDR on the Quality Management System. Karl-Heinz Spohn

ISO FDA QSR. ISO and FDA QSR: A Step by Step Guide to Complying with Medical Device QMS Requirements

MDR Post Market Surveillance

The upcoming EU MDR. Gert Bos. - key changes overview. Executive director & Partner. ..the practical approach

Experience with Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD)

The Medical Device File

Course Title ID Duration Basic Premium. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices: A Risk-Based Approach N mins

MEDICAL DEVICE RA/QA TRAINING Stay ahead of fast-moving quality and regulatory changes!

MDSAP AUDIT PROCESS. A Manufacturer s Perspective. Connie Hoy EVP Regulatory Affairs Cynosure, Inc.

SOFTWARE APPS AS MEDICAL DEVICES. The Regulatory Landscape 2015 WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER PRODUCED BY MAETRICS

The challenges of software medical device regulation.

Auditdata Your Partner in Audiology Solutions

Prevent Quality System Deficiencies by Conducting Effective Internal Audits. Whitepaper

Global Regulatory Affairs

Perspective: New European IVD Regulations New Concepts for Market Authorizations and Product Launch Schedules

ISO 13485:2016. What s in it - and what does it mean?

Changes to the Medical Devices Directive and affect on Manufacturers

(C) QAdvis. IEC and IEC how to make them work (and why so much attention on SW) QAdvis RMD, Prague, November 8th 2016

Medical Device Complaint Management

Jama Software for Medical Device Development

Self-Care Medical Devices Framework. Dr. Simone Breitkopf Head HEOR, Governmental and Public Affairs

Medical Device Regulation

Medical Device Complaint Management

Certification program "Quality Mark TMT" Checklist initial surveillance inspection

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR MANUFACTURERS OF CLASS I MEDICAL DEVICES

The Impact of Quality Culture on Quality Risk Management. FDA Perspective on Quality Culture; how it Impacts Risk Management

IVD Inspections Technical Update Dr Dragana Milic Medical devices inspections

Regulatory Framework for Medical Device

Clinical Evaluation and Clinical Investigation update MDR

Connecticut Valve & Fitting Co.

EU MDR Timeline. Dr. Christian B. Fulda Jones Day FDLI Annual Conference Access materials at fdli.org/annual2018

The Third Annual BSI Medical Device Regulatory Road Shows

Meeting FDA Standards For Medical Device Quality: An Outof-the-box

Medical Device Regulation Overview

Supplier Overview of Johnson & Johnson MD&D Supplier Quality Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) MDD-013 Supplier Business Reviews

SOFTWARECPR CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY, LLC

MEDICAL DEVICES: Guidance document

Contents. List of Acronyms Preface

IVDR Breakout. Copyright 2017 BSI. All rights reserved.

PDA & West Present: Combination Products Combination Product Hot Topics: Post Approval Device Changes and the New EU MDR Article 117 Requirements

YOU RE CLOSER THAN YOU THINK

Leading Practices on Compliance Series: Design History File (DHF): Tips for Creating a Successful DHF Tuesday, November 27, :00 1:00 pm Eastern

Diagnostics new product development: overview, WHO s scientific and regulatory role, regulatory pathways and demand creation

OMTEC Design Controls -----Design Review CFR, Part ISO 13485:2003, Section 7.3. MidWest Process Innovation, LLC

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics

1 Preface Introduction... 13

COCIR SUSTAINABLE COMPETENCE IN ADVANCING HEALTHCARE

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX. on the audits and assessments performed by notified bodies in the field of medical devices

Quality as an Accelerator: How Technology Can Speed Up Your Product Development Efforts & Improve Compliance

ISO 9001:2015 TRANSITIONS

ISO 13485:2016 Mandatory documentation requirements & MyEasyISO

WORKING DRAFT DOCUMENT

How to Implement and Maintain a Modern CAPA System While Avoiding Common Pitfalls. Jon D. Speer, Founder & VP QA/RA Greenlight Guru

Standard and Directives on Medical Devices

RAC (EU) Examination Study Checklist

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Review of HPRA Draft Guide to Distribution of Medical Devices, including in vitro diagnostic Medical Devices

Purchasing Controls. FDA Small Business Regulatory Education for Industry (REdI) Conference Denver, Colorado May 13, 2015

Transcription:

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Remediation of Legacy Medical Devices

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 What Drives Legacy Remediation? Proactive Recertification / CE Mark Audit Readiness M&A / Due Diligence Reactive Enforcement Action

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Recertification Audit Example: Class IIb Medical Device

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 The Importance of Standards and the ERC Horizontal Standards Vertical Standards Applicability Updates

Regardless of whether a medical device is manufactured within the EU or outside the EU, it cannot be placed on the market within the European Economic Area without a CE mark demonstrating conformity to one of the three medical device Directives. Copyright GCI 2015 5

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Strategies for Legacy Remediation Gap analysis Verification of legacy products Validation of legacy processes Labeling Updates Links to DHF review and Risk Management Business ROI analysis, triage, and prioritization Deciding how far back to go

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Remediation of Legacy Designs Part 1

Establishing Initial Design Requirements 21 CFR 820 FDA s Design Control Guidance 93/42/EEC (MDD) becoming Medical Device Regulation (MDR) ISO 13485:2016 ISO 14971:2007 MEDDEV UDI Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Establishing Initial Design Requirements Design Inputs Market Specification Product Specification Risk Management Usability Applicable Standards Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Product Characterization Taguchi Fractional Factorial DOE Challenge/Limit testing Establishing acceptance criteria Tie to risk Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Post-Market Inputs Quality Metrics Severity, Frequency, Detection New Failure Modes, Hazards, Situations, Harms Increased Risk Assessment Increased Reliability/Confidence Additional Testing Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Remediation of Legacy Manufacturing Processes Part 2

Validation Standards & Regulations ISO 13485:2016 GHTF/IMDRF 93/42/EEC Medical Device Regulation 21 CFR 820 Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Reasons for Validation New process Modified process Remediation Enforcement action Evolving standard/regulation Facility relocation / duplication Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Strategies for Process Validation What to combine What NOT to combine Stacked challenge testing Test Method Validation Risk and sampling plans Conclusion Statements Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Confidence and Reliability are Essential Inputs Confidence Level Typical Values Reliability and Risk Reliability and Percent Defective Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Remediation of Legacy Documentation Part 3

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Remediation of the DHF Product Specifications Standards Assessment Risk Management + Post Market Surveillance Test Method Validation Design Verification and Design Validation Biocompatibility and Sterilization Process Validation Labeling

Requirements of the Medical Device File Purpose: to contain or reference documents generated to demonstrate conformity to the requirement of the ISO 13485:2016 standard and compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Requirements of the Medical Device File General description of device Intended use Labelling incl. IFU Product specifications Procedures or specifications for manufacturing, packaging, storage, handling and distribution Measuring and monitoring procedures Requirements for installation and servicing Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

DHF Initial design through Final design MDF + Procedures + Mfg TF/DD + RM +Clinical

Traceability of Inputs to Outputs Product Specification # Product Specification Design Elements Device Nominal, Limit/Challenge Conditions DV Protocol Reference # DV Report Reference # Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Maintaining and Updating the Design File Standards Database Subscription Sections of a Technical File/Design Dossier Paper or Electronic Design Traceability Matrix Medical Device Files Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Copyright GCI, LLC. 2016 Best Practices Standards assessments should be documented and stored for use across sites. This provides traceability and drives alignment. Have an independent third party review your technical file or design dossier for accuracy. Make the technical documentation a pointer document. When you touch a legacy product s technical documentation, you must bring it fully up to standard. Ensure the ERC is up to date and that you have objective evidence to support conformity with each relevant article in the ERC. Audit the completed file for Good Documentation Practices. Your company designee must sign a new Declaration of Conformity when any info on DoC changes, a change is made to device for which NB approval is required, and upon recertification.

Legacy Watch-Outs Not linking TMV (method defect detection capability) to complaints and risk docs Not considering MDD above ISO 14971:2007 which mandates reduction of risks AFAP Not linking sampling plans in Incoming Inspection and V&V to risk documents and complaints Not considering risk separately in vulnerable populations like the elderly and children. Over-emphasizing frequency as opposed to systemic trends Records don t support updated standards (e.g., V&V) Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Iterative Updates and Improvements Evolving Standards (horizontal and vertical) Regulatory Enforcement Mergers/Acquisitions Line or Facility Transfer New Market Entry Continuous Improvement (proactive) Postmarket Data CAPA Audits/Gap Analyses (mfg and supplier) Recertification Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016

Case Study Provided as Bonus Material to Attendees

Copyright GCI, Inc. 2016 Thanks! Roberta Goode RGoode@GoodeCompliance.com www.goodecompliance.com (954) 399-7510