NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND INTENTION TO SUE PURSUANT TO 30 U.S.C. 1270(a)(2) and M.C.A

Similar documents
Ryan. Zinke. David E. 6 th Ave. To Whom It May. Concern: This letter. is to notify and Reclamation

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SUE PURSUANT TO 30 U.S.C. 1270(a)(2) Pursuant to 30 U.S.C. 1270(b) and 30 C.F.R , Citizens Coal Council ("CCC")

Case 3:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT HUNTINGTON

28 U.S.C and The relief requested is authorized pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Case 1:08-cv CMA-MEH Document 1 Filed 08/21/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Montana Department of Environmental Quality

Overview of the EPA RCRA Coal Ash Rule

March 13, Dear Administrator Wheeler:

Background. Matthew Clifford Attorney at Law 6280 Canning St #1 Oakland, CA 94609

Legal Issues - The CHIA and Hydrologic Aspects of Mine Permitting

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:18-cv EJL Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 11

Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation th Avenue, P.O. Box Helena, MT August 31, 2016

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11

Re: Contamination of Protected Underground Sources of Drinking Water; Request for Enforcement Action

1207 Grandview Avenue, Suite 201 (614)

Decision of the Alabama Surface Mining Commission on the Petition of the Black Warrior River Keeper to Designate Certain Lands as Unsuitable for Coal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Republic of Buryatia Seminar on Legal and Technical Strategies for Addressing Accumulated Damage at Mining Sites in the Republic of Buryatia

INTRODUCTION. 1. The specific standard, limitation, or order alleged to have been violated.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING BEFORE THE COLORADO WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION

CLEAN WATER ACT SIXTY DAY NOTICE LETTER RE: UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS AND FILL MATERIALS, CATRON COUNTY

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Regulation of Groundwater

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1

Gold King Mine Release: Utah s Response and Implications for Our Waters

WATER CODE TITLE 2. WATER ADMINISTRATION SUBTITLE D. WATER QUALITY CONTROL CHAPTER 26. WATER QUALITY CONTROL SUBCHAPTER A. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

TOWN OF BERKLEY ARTICLE 32 STORM WATER BYLAW

MULTIPLE PARCEL WATER SYSTEM APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Public Notice. Applicant: TXI Operating, LP Project No.: SWF Date: April 2, Name: Mr. Darvin Messer Phone Number:

PETITION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PROGRAM DELEGATION FROM THE STATE OF KENTUCKY

Chapter NONPOTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

December 20, FirstEnergy Corporation 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308

West Virginia Division of Mining and Reclamation Lewis A. Halstead Deputy Director March 31, 2015

In Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1408

Case 2:13-at Document 1 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:17-cv SDD-RLB Document 1 01/12/17 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Civil No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Pursuant to Kan. Stat. Ann. Chapters 65 and 77

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 13

SIGNIFICANT USER WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT. City of Las Cruces, at. Utilities Department Regulatory Environmental Services Section

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

H.B. 968 May 17, 2018 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK

SPECIAL CONDITIONS GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER WMGR089

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

EnerVest Operating, L.L.C., Notice of Endangerment December 7, 2006 Page 2 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CITY OF SIOUX FALLS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES. Chapter 77 Public Works / Water Reclamation. Article 77:01 INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM

Public Notice US Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

REGULATION NO. 1 ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION PREVENTION OF POLLUTION BY OIL FIELD WASTE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:18-cv VAC-CJB Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Comments on the Proposed Stream Protection Rule; Docket ID No. OSM ; Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 143 (July 27, 2015); RIN 1029-AC63

INSTRUCTIONS AND SAMPLE FORMAT FOR PREPARING A PETITION FOR VARIANCE FOR AN AQUIFER REMEDIATION ZONE OF DISCHARGE

Chapter 21. Protecting the Environment COMMON LAW ACTIONS. Nuisance

Notice of Intent to Sue for Failure to Issue Designations for 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

S1D1S SS SX064A S180110; S2D2S SS SX064A00 17XS501520

Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to File Suit for Violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act.

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICE OF OIL AND GAS. GENERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT Permit Number: GP-WV-1-07

WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION SHORT FORM

Release Reporting Requirements. Stoel Rives LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Butte Highlands Joint Venture Mine Design, Operations, and Closure Conference Mine Water Treatment Short Course

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FRIENDS OF THE EARTH AND SIERRA CLUB S MOTION TO INTERVENE AS PARTIES RESPONDENT

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

22 GAR - GEPA DIV. II - WATER CONTROL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION

Notice of Intent to Sue for Violations of the Clean Water Act

Essential Pretreatment program knowledge and requirements in accordance with 40 CFR 403

FACT SHEET and NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT EVALUATION. Department of Environmental Quality Western Region-Salem Office

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/28/13 Page 1 of 16

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Part 131 [EPA-HQ-OW ; FRL ] RIN 2040-AF33

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LAKE FORK OF THE GUNNISON RIVER WATERSHED: WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Dear Mayor Rogge, President Pottle, Mr. Huff, and Mr. Howatt,

Recruitment, Selection, and Placement (General) and Suitability. ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region

June 21, Polska śegluga Morska

*** DRAFT - NOT YET FILED ***

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 3, STATE OF COLORADO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS FILED IN WATER DIVISION 3.

February 10, Via Certified First Class Mail

SARATOGA SPRING WATER COMPANY 11 Geyser Road, Saratoga Springs, New York Phone: , Fax: , Web:

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Fall I. (30 min.)

Chapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw

SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

[RR , XXXR4079V4, RX ] Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON

Application to Discharge Non-Domestic Waste at the Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Trucked Liquid Waste Facility

Transcription:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND INTENTION TO SUE PURSUANT TO September 19, 2011 Richard Opper, Director Department of Environmental Quality 1520 E. Sixth Avenue P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620-0901 Ed Coleman, Bureau Chief Coal and Uranium Program Montana Department of Environmental Quality 2001 11 th Avenue, Bldg. B Helena, MT 59601 Steve Bullock, Attorney General Department of Justice 215 N. Sanders Helena, MT 59601 Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Joseph Pizarchik, Director Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement South Interior Building, Room 233 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20240 Al Klein, Region Director Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320 Denver, CO 80202-3050 Pursuant to 30 U.S.C. 1270(b), 30 C.F.R. 700.13, and Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-252 Montana Environmental Information Center and the Sierra Club (collectively the Citizens ) notify each of you that in the absence of timely actions that ensure performance of certain 1

statutory duties pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 1201-1328 ( SMCRA ) and the approved Montana state regulatory program that implements that statute, 30 C.F.R. Part 926 ( the Montana program ), the Citizens intend to initiate a civil action or mandamus action pursuant to 30 U.S.C. 1270, Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-252, or both of those statutes against Mr. Opper, Mr. Coleman, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, or all or any combination of those persons. The Citizens intend to commence such litigation sixty (60) days from the date on which they mail this notice, or as soon thereafter as counsel may prepare and file the necessary papers. However, the Citizens reserve the right to file the contemplated civil action or mandamus action within the sixty day period if they determine that approval of any pending application for a new or significantly revised permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations would constitute an imminent threat to the health or safety of any member of MEIC or the Sierra Club, or would immediately affect the legal interest of any such member. The Citizens send this notice as a result of serious concerns that DEQ is not meeting its mandatory duties to ensure that Montana coal mines are designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside their permit areas and in fact are not causing material damage to the hydrologic balance outside of the permitted mine area. As outlined in detail below, the Citizens have discovered that DEQ has a pattern and practice of failing to follow state and federal requirements to consider the effects of coal mining on ground and surface water before coal mining commences or is expanded so that DEQ can ensure that the mine is designed to prevent material damage to water quality and quantity. Of particular concern is DEQ s failure to consider whether the mines are causing or contributing to excursions from state water quality 2

standards, especially given the fact that many of the waters around the mines are already failing to meet state water quality standards. I. SMCRA AND THE MONTANA PROGRAM IMPOSE MANDATORY, NON- DISCRETIONARY ACTS OR DUTIES THAT YOU HAVE NOT PERFORMED. Pursuant to 30 U.S.C. 1211(c)(1) and (c)(2) and 30 C.F.R. 733.11, States that obtain approval from the Secretary of Interior of state regulatory programs for implementing SMCRA have a continuing duty under federal law to implement, administer, enforce, and maintain the approved program in accordance with SMCRA, its implementing federal regulations, and the provisions of the approved program itself. In addition, Montana has elected to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to which the State has obligated itself to regulate surface coal mining and reclamation operations on federal lands within Montana consistent with SMCRA, the federal lands program (30 CFR) Chapter VII, Subchapter D) (sic), and the Montana State Program. 30 C.F.R. 926.30 ( the Montana Cooperative Agreement ). Accordingly, SMCRA, the Montana Cooperative Agreement, and the Montana program collectively and severally impose on the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and the officials who control its actions (collectively DEQ ) a mandatory, non-discretionary duty to withhold approval of any application for (1) a new surface mining permit or (2) a significant revision of any previously issued surface mining permit unless and until the application affirmatively demonstrates and DEQ finds in writing on the basis of the information set forth in the application or from information otherwise available which DEQ documents in its approval papers that, among other things: (1) the permit application is accurate and complete; (2) the permit applicant has complied with all of the requirements of SMCRA and the 3

Montana program; and (3) based on an assessment of the probable cumulative impact of all anticipated mining in the area on the hydrologic balance, the proposed operation has been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area. 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(1), (b)(3); 30 C.F.R. 773.15(c)(1), (c)(5); Mont. Code Ann. 82-4- 227(3)(a); ARM 17.24.314(5), 17.24.405(6)(c). As part of every cumulative hydrologic impact assessment ( CHIA ), SMCRA, the Montana Cooperative Agreement, and the Montana program require DEQ to, among other things: (1) base the agency s designation of the cumulative impact area for the proposed or revised operation on a scientific, data-based analysis of the area within which impacts that likely will result from the proposed operation may measurably interact with impacts of all anticipated mining on surface and groundwater systems, in accordance with 30 C.F.R. 701.5 (cumulative impact area), 733.11, 773.15(e), 780.21, 784.14(f), and ARM 17.24.301(31), 17.24.302; (2) specify all anticipated mining within the cumulative impact area according to the standards stated in 30 C.F.R. 701.5 (cumulative impact area) and ARM 17.24.301(31); (3) define, for each lawfully designated cumulative impact area, the threshold limits or ranges of cumulative hydrologic impact which, if exceeded, would constitute material damage to the hydrologic balance, in accordance with the requirements of ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, 17.24.405(6)(c) (as those regulations must be interpreted in light of 30 C.F.R. 780.21 or 784.14, and 48 Fed. Reg. 43,973 (Sept. 26, 1983)); and 4

(4) include among such threshold limits or ranges, at a minimum, each numeric water quality standard applicable to each water resource within the cumulative impact area, in accordance with Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-203. Among other things, the water quality standards applicable at Montana coal mines prohibit pollution... of any state waters, which include ground water, as well as the placement of wastes where they will cause pollution of any state waters. Mont. Code Ann. 75-5-605(1)(a), 75-5-103(33). Pollution is broadly defined as: (i) contamination or other alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological properties of state waters that exceeds that permitted by Montana water quality standards ; or (ii) the discharge, seepage, drainage, infiltration, or flow of liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substance into state water that will or is likely to create a nuisance or render the waters harmful, detrimental, or injurious to public health, recreation, safety, or welfare, to livestock, or to wild animals, birds, fish, or other wildlife. Mont. Code Ann. 75-5-103(29)(a). Specifically, water quality standards applicable in Montana streams include specific numeric limits on concentrations of the following pollutants, which, among others, are commonly associated with wastewater discharges from surface coal mining and reclamation operations: Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Copper Cyanide Hexavalent chromium Iron Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc. Montana Circular 7. Chloride is another pollutant of concern for which the federal Safe Drinking Water Act standard applies. 40 C.F.R. 143.3. Surface coal mining and reclamation 5

operations also change the hydrology of the area, which, among other impacts, has caused increases in total dissolved solids and sulfates as well as changes in specific conductance. II. MONTANA DEQ S PATTERN AND PRACTICE OF FAILING TO CARRY OUT EACH OF THESE MANDATORY, NON-DISCRETIONARY DUTIES. Despite the statutory and regulatory requirements just described, Montana DEQ has engaged in a pattern and practice of unlawfully approving applications for new or significantly revised permits for surface coal mining and reclamation operations without performing CHIAs in accordance with the requirements of SMCRA, the Montana Cooperative Agreement, or the Montana program. Specifically, Montana DEQ has from the initiation of the Montana program to the date on which the Citizens mail this notice approved applications for new or significantly revised permits: without analyzing the specific area within which impacts resulting from the proposed operation may measurably interact with the impacts of all anticipated mining on surface and groundwater systems, and then using that analysis as the basis for determining the cumulative impact area for the proposed operation, in violation of the mandatory duty imposed upon the agency by 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(3), ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, and 17.24.405(6)(c); without making a written determination of all anticipated mining in the cumulative impact area, in violation of the mandatory, non-discretionary duty imposed upon the agency by 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(3) and ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, and 17.24.405(6)(c); without first predetermining each of the threshold limits or ranges of cumulative hydrologic impact that constitute material damage to the hydrologic balance in the 6

cumulative impact area of each proposed operation, in violation of the mandatory duty imposed upon the agency by 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(3), 30 C.F.R. 780.21, 784.14 (as interpreted at 48 Fed. Reg. 43,973 (Sept. 26, 19830), Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-203, ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, and 17.24.405(6)(c); and without determining whether the permit applicant s proposed operations may cause or contribute to an excursion from any applicable material damage criterion, including but not limited to an excursion or excursions from any applicable Montana water quality standard in any affected surface water resource, so as to determine rationally whether each proposed surface coal mining operation has been designed to prevent material damage outside the permit area in accordance with 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(3), Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-203, and ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, and 17.24.405(6)(c). Consequently, DEQ has unlawfully approved mining permit applications based only on purely pro forma, irrational material damage findings in violation of the mandatory, nondiscretionary duty that 30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(3), Mont. Code Ann. 82-4-203, ARM 17.24.301(67), 17.24.304(1)(e), (f), 17.24.314, and 17.24.405(6)(c) impose upon the agency. The unlawful pattern and practice of Montana DEQ with respect to performance of CHIAs is evident in the issuance of numerous mining permits and significant revisions to such permits, each of which adversely affects the Citizens due to one or more of the deficiencies identified in this notice. Such permits include but are not limited to: App. No. Mine Name Permittee 143 Savage Mine Knife River Coal Mining Co. 164 Spring Creek Mine Spring Creek Coal Co. 166 Absaloka Mine Westmoreland Resources, Inc. 7

170 172 174 175 178 180 181 182 Absaloka Mine Rosebud Mine Spring Creek/Decker Spring Creek/Decker Bull Mountain Mine No. 1 Big Sky Mine Absaloka Mine Spring Creek/Decker Westmoreland Resources, Inc. Western Energy Co. Spring Creek Coal Co.lDecker Coal Co. Spring Creek Coal Co.lDecker Coal Co. Bull Mountain Coal Mining, Inc. Big Sky Coal Co. Westmoreland Resources, Inc. Spring Creek Coal Co.lDecker Coal Co. At present, the likelihood that DEQ will similarly approve Western Energy Company's Area B Amendment 00184 pending application without pcrfonning a lawful CHIA and without making a reasoned material damage fmding threatens the Citizens' interest in usc and enjoyment of ground water and surface water surrounding Rosebud Mine, including East Fork Armells Creek, West Fork Armells Creek, and Rosebud Creek. III. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED INFORMATION Montana Environmental Information Center's address is: 107 W Lawrence St. #N-6, Helena, MT 59601 and its mailing address is P.O. Box 1184 Helena, MT 59624; its telephone number is (406) 443-2520. Sierra Club's address is 85 Second Street, 2d Floor, San Francisco, California 94105; its telephone number is (415) 977-5680. The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Citizens' legal counsel are shown below. The Citizens request that any person receiving this notice direct all inquiries and correspondence to the undersigned legal counsel. MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER SIERRA CLUB - By Counsel - Western Environmental Law Center 208 Paseo del Pueblo Sur, Unit 602 30 U.S.C. I 270(a)(2) and M.C.A. 82-4-252 8

Taos, New Mexico 87571 Tel.: 575.613.4195 Fax: 575.751.1775 anderson@westernlaw.org Walton D. Morris, Jr. Morris Law Office, P.C. 1901 Pheasant Lane Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 Tel.: 434.293.6616 Fax: 434.293.2811 wmorris@charlottesville.net 9