Trade Liberalization and Turkish. Agriculture

Similar documents
Integration processes in the CIS region and their implications for agricultural trade, March 2015, Kaliningrad, Russia

Impact of the Gatt Uruguay Round negociations on Turkish agriculture

Turkey s Agricultural Sector

AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND ITS IMPORTANCE

Turkey - EU Interactions analyzed with CAPRI-RD

The Application and Extension of Jiangsu Agricultural Policy Analysis Model ( JAPA )

Prospects and challenges of agricultural trade between China and Latin America: analysis of problems and opportunities from the Chinese perspective

Concept and Explorative Application of an EU-wide, Regional Agricultural Sector Model (CAPRI-Project) Thomas Heckelei & Wolfgang Britz

Aus dem Institut für Marktanalyse und Agrarhandelspolitik

North African Countries and Agricultural Trade Liberalization Under the Doha Round: Does a Top Down Analysis Matters?

The Austrian agricultural sector in 2013 Management and environmental perspectives

A Micro-Economic Analysis of Farm Restructuring in Khorezm Region, Uzbekistan

Prospects for agricultural markets and income in the EU

Reducing Post-Harvest Losses in TURKEY 13 OCTOBER 2016 ANKARA

Linking FARMIS and ESIM

GMOs, Endogenous knowledge spillovers and CAP policy

Analysis of the Impact of Decoupling on Agriculture in the UK

IMPORTANCE OF CAP REFORMS FOR THE DUTCH AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN Andrzej Tabeau, Myrna van Leeuwen

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the first common policy adopted by the

Producer price index 1998/99 to 2002/03 (July to June) / / / / /03 Year

4 Agribusiness and economy-wide effects of the Agenda 2000 CAP EU reform

Impact of WTO Accession on China's Agriculture, Rural Development and on Farmers

European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development PROSPECTS FOR AGRICULTURAL MARKETS AND INCOME IN THE EU

Analysis of the Impact of the Abolition of Milk Quotas, Increased Modulation and Reductions in the Single Farm Payment on UK Agriculture

Consequences of 2003 CAP Reform for Dutch Agriculture

and Trade Jikun Huang Chinese Academy of Sciences

OECD Agricultural Outlook and Its Baseline Process using AGLINK model Atsuyuki UEBAYASHI, OECD

Could free trade alleviate effects of climate change: A worldwide analysis with emphasis on Morocco and Turkey

World Agricultural Outlook, Risks, and Challenges for the Coming 10 years

THE WELFARE IMPACT OF JAPANESE AGRICULTURAL TRADE POLICY DISTORTIONS. Sjors Hendricus Antonius Bom *

CAP Reform and the WTO: Potential Impacts on EU Agriculture

KAZAKHSTAN S REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES IN AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS

Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi

Future perspectives and challenges for European agriculture

Contributions and Challenges of Agro-trade to Food Security in China

Impact of Sino-Australia free trade Agreement s talks on China's dairy industry

Water Policy Assessment in a Computable General Equilibrium Setting: Morocco, Mexico, Turkey, South Africa

by Chin-Hwa Sun, Fu-Sung Chiang, and Cheng-Hong Lin*

Potential impacts on agricultural commodity markets of an EU enlargement to Turkey

Identifying Investment Priorities for Malawian Agriculture

Effects of EU dairy policy reform for Dutch agriculture and economy; applying. an agricultural programming / mixed input-output model

The implications for Australian agriculture of changing demand for animal protein in Asia.

FAO RICE CONFERENCE. Rome, Italy, February 2004 IMPLICATIONS OF THE WTO DOHA ROUND FOR THE RICE SECTOR

Evaluating EU Agricultural Policy Reform Using the EU WTO Model

Market Intelligence October Brexit Scenarios: an impact assessment

Agricultural Market Performance in the EU after the 2000 and 2003 CAP Reform An Ex-post Evaluation based on AGMEMOD

agriculture, forestry & fisheries Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Agriculture in China - Successes, Challenges, and Prospects. Prof. Zhihao Zheng College of Economics & Management China Agricultural University

Policy Brief Number 2019:3

Pakistan s Interests in Reforming Global Trade Governance

Assessing the Impact of Southeast Asia's Increasing Meat Demand on Global Feed Demand and Prices

EU Member States in Agri-food World Markets Current Competitive Position and Perspectives

An overview on the CAPRI model Common Agricultural Policy Regionalized Impact Model

OTDS REDUCTIONS IN THE

Assessing Farm Production Costs Using PMP: Theoretical Foundation And Empirical Validation

Minimum Core Data Set

12. Symposium Energieinnovation, , TU Graz

Food, rural, agricultural and fisheries policies in Turkey

Government of India Ministry of Agriculture Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Directorate of Economics and Statistics

Impacts of changes in China and India on New Zealand trade and greenhouse gas emissions

CHAPTER 8. Agriculture and the Malaysian Economy

Cooperatives in the Western Balkans Accession Countries

Chapter 3. Overview of the Agribusiness Sector. 3.1 Agribusiness in the National Economies

THE BRAZILIAN A LOOK AHEAD. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. By John Earl Hutchison

Chapter 8.B. Food and Agricultural Data Base: Local Modifications. Robert A. McDougall

Turkey A Foot in Both Worlds. Kyd D. Brenner DTB Associates LLP USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum February 21, 2013

Impact of partial decoupling on prices, production and farm revenues in the EU

Economic Impacts on the Least Developed African countries by China s. Tariff Reduction: an Analysis Based on General Equilibrium Model

Irish Agriculture 20 th June 2018 Trevor Donnellan: Teagasc

Integration into the world economy has accelerated economic growth in

EU support of its processing tomato industry and the competitive consequences for California

Modelling the Effects of Partial Decoupling on Crop and Fodder Area And Ruminant Supply in the EU: Current State and Outlook

The Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model

FAPRI Outlook: Prospects and Uncertainties for the Next Decade

Turkey as a Member of the European Union

Long term consequences of changing global food consumption patterns on U.S. agricultural commodity export demand

Impacts of WTO Policy Reforms on U.S. Rice

China s Role in the Future Food Security Situation of Asia: A Threat or An Ally

Rethinking US Agricultural Policy:

Global Agricultural Supply and Demand: Factors contributing to recent increases in food commodity prices

POLICY ARENA AGRICULTURAL MARKET LIBERALIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE IN SOUTH AFRICA

Global Strategy. Session 1.2: Minimum Set of Core Data Items. Module 1: Sampling in the Context of the Global Minimum Set of Core Data Items

Protectionist View Impacts on American Agriculture VERONICA NIGH AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 11/13/2018

Supply, demand, and projected nutritional need for fruits and vegetables

Economic Review. South African Agriculture. of the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

Assessing the Economic Impacts of Incorporating Romania s Agricultural and Food Sectors into

OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook Methodology

Table 1 shows the general form of China 2010 I-O Table:

MODELLING THE EFFECTS OF PARTIAL DECOUPLING ON CROP AND FODDER AREA AND RUMINANT SUPPLY IN THE EU: CURRENT STATE AND OUTLOOK

Food Security, Farming, and Climate Change to 2050 Scenarios, Results, Policy Options

Science Against Hunger: Monitoring and Forecasting Tools to Avoid Food Crises

THE MODEL: ASSUMPTIONS, FEATURES, AND DATA REQUIREMENTS

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY

China s Accession to WTO

INFORMATION NOTE, MAY

Sensitive Products. Harry de Gorter and Will Martin 22 January 2007

Report for Congress. Iraq's Economy: Past, Present, Future. June 3, Jonathan E. Sanford Coordinator Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division

The Impacts of Reforming Rice Direct Payment Policy of Korea: A Combined Topdown and Bottom-up Approach

Rice Tariffication in Japan : A General Equilibrium Analysis

Transcription:

1 Trade Liberalization and Turkish Agriculture Erol H. Cakmak Department of Economics Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 2/20 Background (Trade and tariffs) Model Scenarios & Results Concluding Remarks

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 3/20 Agro-Food Trade,, 1999-2005

Agro-Food Exports, 1999-2005 CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 4/20

Agro-Food Imports, 1999-2005 CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 5/20

Trade in raw and processed agro-food products, 99-05 CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 6/20

Bound and Applied Tariffs, 2006 250 200 150 100 50 0 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 04 04 04 04 05 06 07 07 07 08 08 08 08 08 09 10 11 11 12 12 12 13 15 15 15 15 16 16 17 17 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 22 22 22 22 23 23 24 33 41 41 43 51 51 (percent) WTO-Bound Average: 65 % Applied Average in 2006: 50 % Overhang: 24 % Bound rate Applied-06 HS 2 (original HS 12) CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 7/20

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 8/20 Turkey and the EU Turkey s s journey to EU started in 1963. Membership, if it ever happens, will involve full liberalization of trade in agricultural products with EU. Impact of liberalization on Turkish agriculture depends on: the path of agricultural policies in Turkey and EU, and also on accession negotiations. EU s s MED policies Multilateral negotiations

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 9/20 MODEL Model maximizes the sum of consumers' and producers' surplus [Samuelson (1952) and Takayama and Judge (1964)]. Output prices are endogeneous to the model. Partial equilibrium static optimization model. Basic approach undertaken for supply calibration is Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP) with Maximum Entropy [Paris and Howitt (1998), Heckelei and Britz (1999 and 2000)].

I/O Structure in Production-4 4 regions covers 95% of agriculture (96.3%); Crop and livestock sub-sectors sectors are integrated endogenously 200 activities to produce 55 commodities with ~250 equations and 350 variables CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 10/20

Demand and Supply Interactions Trade is allowed in raw and in raw equivalent form for processed products. Foreign trade is differentiated for EU, USA and ROW. CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 11/20

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 12/20 Scenarios: EU-OUT, EU-CU, EU-IN 2004 Policies (Status Quo) Year: 2004 Impose estimated changes in population, income, import and export prices, input prices, yields and resource endowments until 2015 Year: 2015 2004 Policies (Status Quo) Policy change in 2015 Base Period Model (2002-04) Projection to 2015 Baseline Scenario EU-OUT 2015 Integration with the EU EU-CU and EU-IN 2015 Model calibrated to base period values and 2004 policy parameters GME-OLS 2-step 2 estimation process to forecast the values of these parameters in 2015 Model projected to 2015 IMPACTS

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 13/20 Projection Assumptions to 2015 1.4 percent population growth per year Population growth rate is determined from FAOSTAT 1.3 percent net per capita income growth per year. GDP per capita in 1987 prices (linear trend) 210,000 ha increase in irrigated area (150,000 ha in GAP and 60,000 ha in ROT) Prices are adjusted to 2015 using FAPRI (2005) price projections and FAO export unit values data (1961-2004). Yield Increases until 2015: The yield growths are estimated using last 10 years data with GME taken last 45 years data estimates with OLS as support vector center points, i.e., a priori information.

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 14/20 to 2015... EU-OUT OUT: : Baseline EU-CU: CU extended to agro-food products EU-IN: CU+ Intervention purchases Compensatory payments (cereals, oilseeds and protein crops and set-aside) Other supports (durum, olive oil, coton, milk, beef, mutton)

General Results - 1/2 2002-04 2015 Change from EU- OUT (%) BASE EU-OUT EU-CU EU-IN EU-CU EU-IN tal Surplus (Index) 100.0 105.1 105.2 105.2 0.1 0.1 with CAP Support - - - 107.1 1.9 roducers Surplus 100.0 101.7 100.8 100.8-0.9-0.9 with CAP Support - - - 102.9 1.1 onsumers Surplus 100.0 141.6 153.0 153.1 8.0 8.1 tal Production olume a 33,997 42,951 40,795 40,461-5.0-5.8 alue 33,997 43,343 37,696 37,739-13.0-12.9 op Production olume a 23,191 29,536 27,941 27,616-5.4-6.5 alue 23,191 28,152 26,121 26,172-7.2-7.0 vestock Production olume a 10,806 13,415 12,854 12,845-4.2-4.2 alue 10,806 15,192 11,575 11,568-23.8-23.9 tal Consumption olume a 29,441 37,376 40,335 40,276 7.9 7.8 alue 29,441 37,870 36,222 36,079-4.4-4.7 op Consumption olume a 18,368 23,713 23,849 23,790 0.6 0.3 alue 18,368 22,366 21,873 21,730-2.2-2.8 vestock Consumption olume a 11,073 13,663 16,486 16,486 20.7 20.7 alue 11,073 15,505 14,349 14,349-7.5-7.5 t Exports 2,264 3,564 77-306 -97.8-108.6 rop Products 2,537 3,909 2,889 2,633-26.1-35.7 ivestock Products -273-346 -2,811-2,818 713.6 715.6 Almost no change in total welfare With CAP it increases by 2 %. Without CAP slight reduction in producers welfare Slight increase with CAP Significant increase in the consumers surplus Limited impact on total production Membership brings 11% decrease in prices Significant decrease in the prices of livestock prodcuts Total consumption volume increase by 8%, but the expenditure declines by 5% More amplified in the case of livestock prodcuts ice Index (Laspeyres) 100.0 102.0 91.3 91.3-10.5-10.5 rop Products 100.0 94.6 92.1 92.0-2.7-2.7 ivestock Products 100.0 114.3 90.1 90.1-21.2-21.2 CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 15/20

General Results - 2/2 2002-04 2015 Change from EU- OUT (%) BASE EU-OUT EU-CU EU-IN EU-CU EU-IN Total Surplus (Index) 100.0 105.1 105.2 105.2 0.1 0.1 with CAP Support - - - 107.1 1.9 Producers Surplus 100.0 101.7 100.8 100.8-0.9-0.9 with CAP Support - - - 102.9 1.1 Consumers Surplus 100.0 141.6 153.0 153.1 8.0 8.1 Total Production Volume a 33,997 42,951 40,795 40,461-5.0-5.8 Value 33,997 43,343 37,696 37,739-13.0-12.9 Crop Production Volume a 23,191 29,536 27,941 27,616-5.4-6.5 Value 23,191 28,152 26,121 26,172-7.2-7.0 Livestock Production Volume a 10,806 13,415 12,854 12,845-4.2-4.2 Value 10,806 15,192 11,575 11,568-23.8-23.9 Membership makes Turkey net importer in agricultural products Boom in the imports of livestock products can not be compensated by the increase in the exports of crop products Total Consumption Volume a 29,441 37,376 40,335 40,276 7.9 7.8 Value 29,441 37,870 36,222 36,079-4.4-4.7 Crop Consumption Volume a 18,368 23,713 23,849 23,790 0.6 0.3 Value 18,368 22,366 21,873 21,730-2.2-2.8 Livestock Consumption Volume a 11,073 13,663 16,486 16,486 20.7 20.7 Value 11,073 15,505 14,349 14,349-7.5-7.5 Significant changes in the volume of production and trade Net Exports 2,264 3,564 77-306 -97.8-108.6 Crop Products 2,537 3,909 2,889 2,633-26.1-35.7 Livestock Products -273-346 -2,811-2,818 713.6 715.6 Price Index (Laspeyres) 100.0 102.0 91.3 91.3-10.5-10.5 Crop Products 100.0 94.6 92.1 92.0-2.7-2.7 Livestock CAL-MED Products 100.0 114.3 90.1 April 90.1 26-27, 27, 2007-21.2 - Barcelona -21.2 16/20

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 17/20 Impact on Net Exports Apart from livestock products, net imports of cereals and oilseeds go up in CU and membership wheat and maize

On the other hand, net exports of pulses, fruits and vegetables increase chickpeas, peppers, tomatoes, cucumbers, hazelnuts, apples, apricots and citrus CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 18/20

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 19/20 CONCLUSION Overall welfare effect is small. Consumers will benefit from EU integration due to declining prices. Increased consumption will be realized with a lower level of expenditure. CAP supports are important for the welfare of producers. Increase in net exports of crop products will be far from compensating the increase in the net imports of livestock products.

CAL-MED April 26-27, 27, 2007 - Barcelona 20/20 Agricultural Cost Estimate of Turkey to EU EUR million (at 2004 prices) Current Policies Reduction in Direct Payments 2015 Full 2015, 25% 2025 2015 Full 2015, 25% 2025 Total Crop Payments 4,416 1,104 3,844 3,159 790 1,967 Compensatory Area Pay. 2,130 532 1,854 1,523 381 948 Cereals 1,963 491 1,708 1,404 351 874 Oilseeds 62 16 54 44 11 28 Protein Crops 105 26 91 75 19 47 Other Direct Crop Pay. 2,287 572 1,990 1,636 409 1,018 Durum Wheat 274 69 239 196 49 122 Hazelnut 33 8 28 23 6 15 Tobacco 298 75 260 213 53 133 Olive Oil 191 48 166 137 34 85 Cotton 1,490 372 1,297 1,066 266 664 Total Livestock Payments* 1,456 364 1,267 1,042 260 649 Beef Payments 601 150 523 430 107 268 Sheep Meat Payments 492 123 429 352 88 219 Milk Payments 363 91 316 260 65 162 TOTAL 5,873 1,468 5,111 4,201 1,050 2,615