Shrub removal and grazing alter the spatial distribution of infiltrability in a shrub encroached woodland

Similar documents
Effects of artificial watering points on rangeland bird communities

Rangeland Watersheds. Maintenance and provision of genetic resources Maintenance and regeneration of habitat Provision of shade and shelter

Shrub encroachment alters the spatial patterns of infiltration

Rangeland ecology II

Pastoralists in the arid shrublands of Western Australia name the elephant in the room

Mission. Selected Accomplishments from Walnut Gulch. Facilities. To develop knowledge and technology to conserve water and soil in semi-arid lands

Quantifying Grassland-to-Woodland Transitions: Implications for Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in the Southwest United States

4. Processes and models of dryland dynamics. Fundamentals of Ecohydrology (Philippe CHOLER CNRS France). Wuwei (09/2013)

ASSESSING AND MONITORING THE HEALTH OF WESTERN RANGELAND WATERSHEDS

Estimating the cost of protecting biodiversity on privately managed properties in the Australian Rangelands

Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 16, 1997 WIT Press, ISSN

Soil nutrients under shrub hummocks and debris mounds two decades after ploughing

Tiny desert mice could help save Australia's grasslands from invasion

Part I. Ecological Sites and Soil Survey. Part II. A Framework for Soil and Vegetation Dynamics

The risky business of designing land tenure policy in the Gobi Desert

Improving Reclamation on Oil and Gas Well Pads in the Rocky Mountain West

Agro-ecosystems functioning under stress Ilan Stavi

BioCondition, Ecological Equivalence and Environmental Offsets

Ecological Thresholds: Bridging Theory and Application

Range Management and Conservation. Rangeland Management and

Climate change and the Ecohydrology of Australia: Future Research Needs

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AUSTRALIAN RANGELAND SOCIETY. BIENNIAL CONFERENCE Official publication of The Australian Rangeland Society

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Biodiversity impacts of ground tank closure in southeast Australian rangelands

Are shrubs really a sign of declining ecosystem function? Disentangling the myths and truths of woody encroachment in Australia

Plant-soil feedbacks and the reversal of desertification with climate change

2.5. Accuracy Testing

Understanding the Importance of Resilience and Resistance to the Restoration of Sagebrush Rangelands

Effects of Different Land Use on Soil Hydraulic Properties

The effect of water spreading system on the functionality of rangeland ecosystems

Management-Intensive & Multiple-Species Grazing

Ploughing and grazing alter the spatial patterning of surface soils in a shrubencroached

STANDARDS FOR HEALTHY PUBLIC RANGELANDS

Effects of Contour Furrow on Ecological Indices of Range Health Using Landscape Function Analysis (Case study: Ghick Sheikha Rangeland, Jiroft, Iran)

Pat L. Shaver USDA-NRCS-WNTSC Portland, OR

Submitted to Oxford University Press for publication ISBN

Section III: Indicator calculation and interpretation

Grassland Ecosystem Function: Uplands

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev" Vegetation Ecology Course 2015/16 Bertrand Boeken. Rangeland ecology I

Considerations and Development of the Hydrologic Function Section in Rangeland ESD s. K.E. Spaeth USDA-NRCS, Fort Worth, Tx

Fire and Soil Health on Rangelands. J. Derek Scasta - Assistant Professor and Extension Rangeland Specialist University of Wyoming

extinction rates. (d) water availability and solar radiation levels are highest in the tropics. (e) high temperature causes rapid speciation.

HU-205: Geography. Geography 04: Biogeochemical Cycles & Biosphere. Biomes. Global patterns in the biosphere

Factors Influencing the Spatial Variability of Runoff at Differing Scales in the Jornada Basin

Experimentales y Tecnologõa, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Tulipan S/N, Mostoles, Spain; and

The Northern Grazing Systems Project: Estimating safe stocking rate

SUMMARY SPECIFICATIONS. Product Specifications and Application Guidelines for Compost Mulches for Orchard Production in NSW

Ecosystem goods and services as affected by shrub encroachment

Ecological Site Descriptions and Hydrologic Assessment

Overview: History & Tradition. An Overview of Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health: Carrying Capacity Surveys.

Soils, Resilience and Stateand-Transition

Report as of FY2008 for 2008NV134B: "Soil Heterogeneity and Moisture Distribution Due to Rainfall 1 Events

Evaluating potential indicators of ecosystem functioning

EVALUATION OF A NUMBER OF GRASS SPECIES FOR RESTORING DEGRADED SEMI-ARID RANGELANDS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA. K. Kellner and S. de Wet

Restoring Riparian Zone Function

State & Transition Models: Moving Beyond Boxes and Arrows. Steve Archer University of Arizona

Rangeland ecology: Key global research issues & questions

Interaction between soil health, forage quality/quantity, and livestock production

Grazing Systems. " Grazing period = The season and number of days during which a pasture is grazed.

The impacts of grazing land management on the wind erodibility of the Mulga Lands of western Queensland, Australia

Climate-induced induced Threshold Responses in Rangelands

Physical Geography by Alan Arbogast. Chapter 10. Plant Geography. Plant Geography. Photosynthesis. Process of photosynthesis

Ecosystem Sustainability and the Cheatgrass Fire Cycle

Planning and Managing to Minimize the Impact of Droughts

Characteristics of surface runoff in a sandy area in southern Mu Us sandy land

Increase in ground cover under a paddock scale rotational grazing experiment in South-east Queensland

Defining and Evaluating Ecosystem Recovery. Jeanne Chambers USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Reno

8/10/2011. Lesson Overview. Rangelands. Rangelands. Brush management on rangelands. Advantages and disadvantages. Specific mechanical treatments

Shrub Microsite Influences Post-fire Perennial Grass Establishment

Characteristics of Forest Landscapes Throughout the World

Managing Upland Grazing to Restore Soil Health and Farm Livelihoods

Potentialities for CDM in Africa Sudan case Abdalla Gaafar Mohammed Forests National Corporation Sudan

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment)

Range Management Terminology. 4. Importance of Rangeland. Range Management Chapter 1

USFS Rangeland Management Seminar July 26 th August 9 th, Glossary of Terms

Impact of Pocket Gophers on Long and Short Term Prairie Vegetation Diversity. 29 June 2010 EEB Anh Do. Matt Knoeck.

Lecture 11: Water Flow; Soils and the Hydrologic Cycle

Monitoring Manual. for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems. Volume I: Quick Start

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

DESERTIFICATION. M.V.K. Sivakumar Agricultural Meteorology Division World Meteorological Organization

Managing Grassland Ecosystems: Teacher Notes

State and Transition Ecosystem Models Application to Soil Survey and Dynamic Soil Properties Databases

Construction Engineering

Soil moisture in relation to processes at the land surface VEGETATION Provides transpirable pool of water controls the structure, function and diversi

Galiuro Exploration Drilling Project

The economic consequences of the environmental impacts of alien plant invasions in South Africa

Information Technologies for Rangeland Monitoring: What Do They Need To Address?

Harvesting pasture cropped oats on Winona with summer perennial grass emerging beneath the crop. Pasture Cropping. Profitable Regenerative Agriculture

Available online at Journal of Soil Environment 1 (2015) 28-34

IMPACTS OF FIRE AND GRAZING ON NATIVE VERTEBRATES*

Improving Rainfall Effectiveness On Rangeland

Pre and Post Vegetation Management Decisions around Burning & Grazing

Tillage and Crop Residue Removal Effects on Evaporation, Irrigation Requirements, and Yield

The National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators

Standardised vegetation survey and monitoring data across the Australian rangelands from TERN AusPlots

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble Participants Principles Collaborate Reduce the threat of unnatural crown fire.

Soil water balance modelling highlights limitations for pasture production in northern NSW

Managing Grassland Ecosystems: Teacher Notes

Prescott National Forest

Fire Ecology of the Southern Great Plains

Transcription:

Shrub removal and grazing alter the spatial distribution of infiltrability in a shrub encroached woodland Daryanto, S. 1 and Eldridge, D.J. 2 1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, UNSW 2 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, c/- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052 Keywords: Infiltration; spatial pattern; disturbance Abstract The tendency of water to infiltrate (infiltrability) determines the productivity of rangelands. However, how patterns of infiltrability change in response to gradients of disturbance remains largely unexplored. To address this, we examined changes in the pattern of infiltrability across a disturbance gradient in a semi arid Australian woodland. We measured the spatial distribution of infiltrability in relation to distance from the canopy of trees and shrubs at long ungrazed sites to ploughed and grazed sites. Infiltrability on long ungrazed sites was relatively homogenous throughout the landscape and up to distances of four metres from plant canopies. In contrast, at either grazed or grazed and ploughed sites, infiltrablilty was demonstrated a heterogeneous pattern across the plot. Infiltrability was also greatest only around vegetated patches but very low at distance of more than 2 m from woody plant canopies. Factors such as increased bulk density and removal of cryptogamic soil crusts as a result of livestock trampling are probably responsible for the heterogeneous patterns of infiltrability. Our results highlight the importance of maintaining woody plants for maximising infiltration of water in the semi arid woodland. Removal of woody shrubs by ploughing with and without grazing appears to have a deleterious effect on infiltrability. Introduction It has been well documented that infiltration is greatest under vegetated patches and that grazing reduces infiltration rates, mainly as a result of trampling induced soil disturbance (Castellano et al. 2007). By contrast, soil accumulating under shrubs has different properties to that of the surrounding interspaces. It is usually sandier in texture, has more macropores, Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 1 of 6

due to invertebrate activity, and has lower bulk density (Dunkerley 2000; Stavi et al. 2008), which contribute to the increased ability of shrub mounds to absorb water. Previous research has documented marked changes in the spatial distribution of soil nutrients, solar radiation and soil moisture due to grazing in semi-arid woodlands (Breshears et al. 1997; Stavi et al. 2008). As infiltration is a key determinant of production in semi arid woodlands, rangeland managers are particularly interested in the long term effects of ploughing and grazing on the spatial distribution of infiltration. We examined soil infiltrability (the ability of soil to accept water) as an indicator of infiltration, at sites in a shrub encroached woodland, and hypothesized that grazing and shrub removal by ploughing would alter the spatial distribution of soil infiltration. Methods The study was conducted near Bourke in north western New South Wales, Australia (29º 16 S, 145º 26 E). In 1990, one block (200 m x 400 m) was established and divided into four equal plots of 100 m wide by 200 m long. The two central plots were then enclosed in a 6 m high, herbivore proof fence. Half of both the fenced and unfenced plots were then ploughed leaving the remaining half unploughed. This design resulted in four combinations: ploughedgrazed, ploughed-ungrazed, unploughed-grazed and unploughed-ungrazed. Here we report the results for three of these combinations, as the ploughed-ungrazed treatment is unlikely to be applied by land managers. The treatments represent a gradient in impact from the most (ploughed-grazed) to least (unploughed-ungrazed) impacted. Within each treatment we established one 10 m x 10 m plot and sampled the surface on a coarse 2 m grid (n=36) as well as a finer grid of points that were spaced at distances of 25 cm apart (n=72) across the plot. For each sampling point, we recorded its position in relation to the canopy (canopy or open), and distance to the canopy. Soil, sampled to 7 cm depth, was collected at each of the 108 points, and a derived index of infiltrability determined using the laboratory based syringe method of Mills et al. (2006). We used the GS+ geostatistical package to examine the nature of the spatial scaling of the infiltrability index at spatial scales ranging from 0.25 to 14 m. Semi-variograms were examined to look for trends in spatial patterning in relation to the disturbance gradient. Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 2 of 6

Results The spatial distribution of the infiltrability index changed in relation to ploughing and grazing (Fig.1). The semi variogram for the least disturbed site (unploughed ungrazed) had a high nugget to sill ratio (± 40%), suggesting that 40% of the variability in infiltrability under this treatment occurred at a scale smaller than our smallest sampling interval of 25 cm. However, it was auto correlated at approximately 4 m, which indicates that infiltration under low levels of disturbance is almost random or independent of the presence of woody perennial vegetation such as shrubs and trees and it was relatively constant with distance from the shrub up to 4 m. This result is supported by the results for changes in infiltrability with increasing distance from shrub or tree canopy (Fig.1), which shows relatively high rates of the index with distance, and only weak declines out to 4 m from the trunk. In contrast, infiltrability under grazing, with or without ploughing was auto correlated at distances of about 1 m, which corresponds to the zone of maximum biological activity of the shrubs. Under the ploughing and/or grazing treatments however, there was a relatively rapid decline in infiltrability from with distance from the canopy, with very low levels at distances of 1.5 to 2 m. Thus under the grazed and/or ploughed treatments, infiltration was restricted to the area in the immediate vicinity of the canopy i.e. < 2m (Fig. 1). Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 3 of 6

Fig. 1. Semi-variogram of infiltrability as well as relationship between distance to canopy and infiltration at three different sites Discussion The major difference between the two semi variogram forms, i.e. those auto correlated at distances of 1 m (ungrazed) or 4 m (grazed), was likely due to grazing and trampling. At the undisturbed site, infiltration was auto correlated at distances extending far beyond that of the zone of maximum biological activity of the shrubs, and was randomly scattered across the site. High rates of infiltrability at 2 4 m from the plant canopy are possible Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 4 of 6

because there is little difference in bulk density (and therefore porosity) between soil under shrubs and soil in the interspaces. This is probably due to the fact that interspace soils in our study are relatively well vegetated with other smaller perennial plants such as grasses and forbs, which would also create zones of higher infiltration. Furthermore, the presence of well developed cryptogamic crusts within the interspaces in the undisturbed site (Daryanto and Eldridge, in review) would be expected to lead to relatively higher rates of infiltration, less than that near the canopy, but certainly greater than that found at distances of > 2 m in the grazed or ploughed treatments. Cryptogam cover is known to increase infiltration by forming micro-catchments on the surface that eventually infiltrate. Our study demonstrates that, in the undisturbed state, infiltration occurred throughout the plot irrespective of the presence of shrubs. In contrast, infiltration on the two disturbed treatments was autocorrelated at about 1 m and therefore highly localized around the shrubs. Clearly grazing induced trampling has a substantial impact on water flow by localizing infiltration to the immediate area around shrubs, where bulk density is generally low and the macroporosity is high (Bhark and Small 2003). Grazing created patches of bare soil and compaction of the surface, which is mediated by the destruction of cryptogamic soil crusts (Neff et al. 2005). In terms of the maximization of infiltrability in woodland soils, existing patches of perennial vegetation are critically important loci for high levels of infiltration in semi arid woodlands (Hartley et al. 2007). Our results suggest that shrubs are important for maintaining ecosystem services such as infiltration and that removal of shrubs will results in lower rates of infiltration and therefore higher runoff and resource loss. References Bhark, E.W. and Small, E.E. (2003). Association between plant canopies and the spatial patterns of infiltration in shrubland and grassland of the Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico. Ecosystems 6, 185-196. Breshears, D.D., Rich, P.M., Barnes, F.J. and Campbell, K. (1997). Overstory-imposed heterogeneity in solar radiation and soil moisture in a semiarid woodland. Ecological Application 7, 1201-1215. Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 5 of 6

Castellano, M. J. and Valone, T. J. (2007). Livestock, soil compaction and water infiltration rate: evaluating a potential desertification recovery mechanism. Journal of Arid Environments 71, 97-108. Dunkerley, D.L. (2000). Assessing the influence of shrubs and their interspaces on enhancing infiltration in arid Australian shrubland. The Rangeland Journal 22, 58-71. Hartley, A., Barger, N., Belnap, J. and Okin, G.S. (2007). Dryland ecosystems. In: Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems (Eds. P. Marschner and Z. Rengel) pp. 271-307. (Springer- Verlag, Berlin). Mills, A.J., Fey, M.V., Grongroft, A., Petersen, A. and Medinski, T.V. (2006). Unraveling the effects of soil properties on water infiltration: segmented quantile regression on a large data set from arid south-west Africa. Australian Journal of Soil Research 44, 783-797. Neff, J.C., Reynolds, R.L., Belnap, J. and Lamothe, P. (2005). Multi-decadal impacts of grazing on soil physical and biogeochemical properties in southeast Utah. Ecological Applications 15, 87-95. Stavi, I., Ungar, E.D., Lavee, H. and Sarah, P. (2008). Grazing-induced spatial variability of soil bulk density and content of moisture, organic carbon and calcium carbonate in a semi-arid rangeland. Catena 75, 288-296. Daryanto, S. and Eldridge, D.J. Shrub removal and grazing after the spatial distribution of infiltrability in a shrub-encroached woodland (2010). In: Proceedings of the 16 th Biennial Conference of the Australian Rangeland Society, Bourke (Eds D.J. Eldridge and C. Waters) (Australian Rangeland Society: Perth). Daryanto & Eldridge (2010) 6 of 6