Capacities and Role of Non Institutional and NGO Nuclear Expertise

Similar documents
Radiation Protection Approach. André-Claude LACOSTE Chairman of ASN

Energiewende as a result of civil society participation and protest

Countermeasures against the Chernobyl Accident in Germany - 25 years of Lessons Learned

Introduction to Italian Law. Origin and development of European (Community) Union. prof. Angelo Venchiarutti

National Renewable Energy Action Plan for Germany and other actions for Greenhouse Gas reduction

WENRA Initiatives Related to New Reactor Designs

Atoms for the Future 2014 Paris September National Debate and Public Confidence in Sweden

Łukasz Koszuk Atomic Forum Foundation

Nuclear Energy & Economic Competitiveness in Various Regulatory Systems

PREPARING FOR MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: PROGRESS IN RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

Networking Towards Sustainable Energy INFORSE-Europe by Gunnar Boye Olesen; August 22, 2017 INFORSE-Europe, SustainableEnergy

Genesis of the F-Gas Regulation

Tatiana Novikova Belarusian Antinuclear Campaign NGO Ecohome

Sweden s nuclear fuel cycle policy

COUNTRY DATA: Germany : Information from the CIA World Factbook

Facts about the European Parliament Elections 2009

The nuclear scene in Europe: current reality and future trends

1. Consequences of eastwards enlargement on E.U. institutions

Down to earth : Soil degradation and sustainable development in Europe. A challenge for the 21 st century

The Weimar Triangle and the future of the European Union

ATTITUDES TOWARDS BIODIVERSITY

THE GOVERNMENT S ACTION PLAN FOR NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE NORTHERN AREA

THE ROLE OF CASSIOPEE IN DEVELOPING RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE STATES OF THE NIS AND CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

International Summer Program

Composition of the European Parliament

Wind energy in Europe markets

Age and Work in Health and Care

Working together to meet global energy challenges

GMO in seeds actual state of affairs

The OECD The Nuclear Energy Agency

Saulius Piksrys Community ATGAJA CEE Bankwatch Network

WM 05 Conference, February 27 March 3, 2005, Tucson, AZ RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE EUROPEAN UNION - PROGRESS TOWARDS NEW LEGISLATION

Warwick Business School

What do European and UK companies think of Brexit? A social media perspective

APRIL The French water companies, experts in water management worldwide

Francis BOUQUILLON. Rapporteur EIN Working group n 10 «Energy and Environment Policy»

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en)

Managing Knowledge from Major Nuclear Accidents Learning the lessons. Yanko Yanev Nuclear Knowledge Management Institute

Richard W. Franke Comments on EROEI of Oil, Coal and Nuclear page 1

Dismantling of nuclear facilities in France: what is at stake?

General Energy Policy

THE EUROPEAN UNION A This is the EU facts and figures B Stages in the process of European integration

The European Union is a body probably unlike any other that exists in the world

MODERNISING THE CIVIL SERVICE Francisco Cardona OECD, Sigma Programme

What s missing from this plan?

Milestones of the European integration process. PSIR 514 European Politics Assistant Professor Dr. Alexander Bürginn

GRI Sustainability Reporting Statistics Publication year By Report Services

Acid Rain in Germany, Air Pollution in UK, & Nuclear Disaster in Chernobyl, Ukraine Brain Wrinkles

The European Union: History and Institutions. Professor Achim Hurrelmann Department of Political Science

Iceland Australia. Ireland Austria Belgium. Italy Canada. Japan Korea. Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States.

The exchange of experience from a global fuel cycle operator point of view

Overview: National coal phase-out announcements in Europe

Germany: Cold War to Reunification

The Ethics dimension of PA Civil Servants

April 28, 1953 Soviet Foreign Ministry Memorandum, 'Regarding Further Measures of the Soviet Government on the German Question'

EPS/SIF Energy Meeting

Comparative health and environmental risks for various energy sources

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Policy: Past and Future

The World Nuclear Industry Status Report and Future Trends

THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF BERLIN PROCESS FOR THE WESTERN BALKANS: A VIEW FROM ALBANIA

Aim: To evaluate how the Berlin Crisis mad relations between USA & USSR worse and its consequences.

Index. anti-government vote, 47, 57 78, 212, 242. See also antigovernment; support; vote against the. government

Photo: Karpov. Wind in power 2009 European statistics. February 2010 THE EUROPEAN WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION

Regional Workshop on Safety Review and Assessment for Regulators Daejeon, Republic of Korea 9 13 September 2013 Country presentation Kazakhstan

ANDRA. National Radioactive Waste Management Agency FRANCE

INFORMATION SHEET. COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT No T MANAGEMENT OF SEVERELY DAMAGED SPENT FUEL AND CORIUM

TELECOMS WATCHDOGS LACK POWERS TO FIGHT MONOPOLIES, STUDY FINDS

The Concept of the. International Working Forum on. Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites RSLS

INSC Assistance on Improvement of Safety of Waste Management and Decommissioning Worldwide

Issues related to Public Perception of Radioactive Waste Management options

Building on local climate and energy experience in Energy Union Governance

membership, particularly because of its close ties to the United States. De Gaulle vetoed British admittance a second time in 1967.

For a Europeanisation of Arms Export Controls More power for Brussels will lead to a stronger Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU

Lessons Learnt after the Chernobyl Accident 25 Years Later

Public opinion on new technologies in the European Union

Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Management Programme. at the Joint Research Centre, Ispra Site

CURRENT AND FUTURE ENERGY SOURCES OF THE WORLD

Conference of States Parties to the ATT (CSP 2018) Tokyo, Japan August 2018

Karen Daifuku Senior Nuclear Project Manager June 2011

ESF Ex-Post evaluation

WIND POWER TARGETS FOR EUROPE: 75,000 MW by 2010

Informal Governance in the European Union

Nuclear Energy s State of Play European Perspective. Andrei Goicea FORATOM Executive Manager 29 October 2018

Country Abbreviations SUMMARY European Union Abbreviations

The Cold War Expands Section 2-Europe Feels the Heat of The Cold War

G8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT. G8 Senior Group, June 2004

Current Status and Issues of Nuclear Power Generation in the World

The French doctrine for the management of the Post-Accident Nuclear Situation

A.I.S.E. s 11 th INFORMATION DAY: Cleanliness and Hygiene : Benefits of the Professional Cleaning sector

G8 Global Partnership Annual Report G8 Senior Group, June 2004

The Stress Test Process in France (CSA*) Its impact on Research Facilities

The World Nuclear Industry Status Report Mycle Schneider International Consultant on Energy and Nuclear Policy Paris, France

Vocational Education and Training (VET) Systems: Role of the Social Partners

Nuclear Legislation in Central and Eastern Europe and the NIS

The Greens/European Free Alliance in the European Parliament Rue Wiertz straat 1047 Brussels Belgium- Phone Fax

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Nuclear Energy

Nuclear Legislation in Central and Eastern Europe

Policy Coherence challenges in Romania in implementing the SDGs

Legal Affairs Overview of Nuclear Legislation in Central and Eastern Europe and the NIS

Transcription:

Capacities and Role of Non Institutional and NGO Nuclear Expertise Lutz Mez Environmental Policy Research Centre, Free University of Berlin, Ihnestr. 22, D-14195 Berlin ABSTRACT: Non institutional and NGO technical nuclear expertise can be found today all over Europe. The level reached varies not only in the member states of the European Union, but especially in comparison with accession countries. The paper sketches briefly the historical development of the capacities and role of non institutional nuclear expertise in Europe. The development pattern follows in general a trend of support of local protest, professionalism, integration and institutionalisation. Local opposition against nuclear facility sites, existing practically in each country with a nuclear program or the nuclear power option in energy planning, was backed by sceptical scientists and scholars in natural and social sciences, located in university and research or the educational system. Nuclear accidents and disasters like Three Mile Islands and Chernobyl gave additional push for the non institutional capacity building. In Central Eastern Europe a certain time lag in this development can be recognised. While the anti nuclear movement could gain foothold during the period before the turn around, fast growing economical problems of the transformation process withdraw very often the small material base for independent nuclear expertise. The present situation of non institutional and NGO nuclear expertise for selected countries is presented and perspectives for the enlarged European Union given.

Lutz Mez Capacities and Role of Non Institutional and NGO Nuclear Expertise

Outline Historical development NI & NGO Capacity in selected EU Member States Chernobyl aftermath Integration and institutionalisation Time lag in CEE & FSU countries Present situation Perspectives

Historical Development Protests of scientists against the military use of nuclear power and proliferation (Pugwash, CND etc.) Citizen protests against nuclear facilities Key events: 1969 Foundation of Friends of the Earth 1972 Club of Rome Limits to Growth 1973 First oil price crisis 1977 Robert Jungk The Nuclear State 1978 Austria Zwentendorf referendum 1979 TMI accident; 2 nd oil price crisis 1986 Chernobyl disaster 1988 Transnuklear Affair 1998 Contaminated Transport Scandal 1999 Tokai Mura Criticality Accident

NI & NGO Capacity in Selected EU Member States - 1 Denmark 1974 foundation of OOA 1976 first alternative energy plan by OOA and OVE 1981 second alternative energy plan 1985 Parliament prohibits the nuclear option in energy planning Sweden 1978 MALTE 1980 Referendum on nuclear power

NI & NGO Capacity in Selected EU Member States - 2 Germany 1975 occupation of the NPP Wyhl site University Bremen For a better understanding of nuclear power 66 questions and 66 answers Foundation of Öko-Institute, IFEU etc. 1978 Traube Müssen wir umschalten? 1980 Enquete Commission Future nuclear power policy 1980 Krause, Bossel, Müller-Reißmann Energie- Wende without oil and uranium 1985 Hennicke et al. Die Energie-Wende ist möglich 1998 First Red-Green Coalition Federal Government

NI & NGO Capacity in Selected EU Member States - 3 France 1962 Foundation of Association pour la Protection contre les Rayons Ionisants (APRI) 1971 Fessenheim controversy 1975 CFDT-CEA L Electronucleaire en France 1976 Foundation of Groupement des Scientifiques pour l Information sur l Energie Nucléaire (GSIEN) 1982 Absorbtion of CFDT expertise in AFME and Castaing Commission 1983 Foundation of WISE-Paris 1986 Foundation of CRII-RAD and INESTENE 1997 First Red-Green Government

NI & NGO Capacity in Selected EU Member States - 4 United Kingdom 1958 Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) 1972 Amory Lovins testimony on fast breeder 1977 Windscale Inquiry 1983 Sizewell Inquiry 1989 First attempted privatisation of electricity sector 1996 NIREX Inquiry

Chernobyl Aftermath Nuclear phase out becomes a political issue German Federal Ministry of Economy commissions two reports on nuclear phase out Italy shuts down three nuclear reactors and halts construction of a fourth after referendum in 1987. Dismantling starts in 1990 Start of nuclear controversy in Soviet Union and CEE countries

Integration and Institutionalisation Starting point - the local nuclear site Affected population in general split on the nuclear issue Local opposition support by some scientists Independent knowledge organised in universities and private institutes Safety issues, whistle blowers and nuclear dropouts Mass media, public attention and changing public opinion Nuclear issue taken up by political establishment Professionalisation of independent expertise (by public and NGO commissioning) Integration and/or neutralisation of non-institutional and NGO expertise in the nuclear safety and radiation protection regimes

Time Lag in CEE & FSU Countries Chernobyl stimulated environmental and anti-nuclear activists and groups After 1990 - two opposing trends Former GDR shut down of all NPPs after unification of Germany Transformation in CEE and FSU countries - withdrawl of economic support for of non-institutional and NGOs 1992 report on the safety of Soviet designed nuclear reactors shut-down of high risk reactors EU accession and nuclear power

Present Situation State of the environmental and anti-nuclear movement [status of NI and independent expertise] Change of issues and paradigms Green parties in PAS and Governments Integration of NI experts and expertise Nuclear phase-out decisions (Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden)

Perspectives Material and financial basis for NI and NGO expertise Education and training European co-operation Nuclear power and climate abatement New alliances and support organisations Quality and investigative journalism Technology optimism

Thank you for your attention! PD Dr. Lutz Mez Environmental Policy Research Centre Freie Universität Berlin umwelt1@zedat.fu-berlin.de http://www.fu-berlin.de/ffu/