FGD Wastewater Treatment Evaluation

Similar documents
Effluent Guidelines and Water Quality Management - Program 56

Trends in Treating WFGD Effluent

Market Survey of FGD Wastewater Treatment

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Wastewater Treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge Technologies: Overview and New Developments Gordon Maller URS Process Technologies, Austin, TX

Selenium Removal. Caroline Dale

Managing the New FGD Wastewater Regulations. Technology Options for Biological Treatment: Maximum Treatment Reliability with Lowest Lifecycle Cost

POWER PLANT WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT

A REVIEW OF ARSENIC REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES AND TECHNOLOGY SELECTION APPROACH ZAID CHOWDHURY, PHD, PE, BCEE

Managing the New FGD Wastewater Regulations. Technology Options for Biological Treatment: Maximum Treatment Reliability with Lowest Lifecycle Cost

STEAM ELECTRIC EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES (ELGs)

Integrated Treatment Options for Meeting Stringent Selenium Regulatory Limits Using Anaerobic Bioreactors

September 20, Water Docket U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 4203M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

REMOVAL OF SELENIUM FROM REFINERY WASTEWATER USING THE HONEYWELL UOP XCEED BIOREACTOR SYSTEM

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Protecting Surface Water from Power Plant Discharges

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Succeed at Removing Metals and Other Contaminants from Water

Selenium Reduction. Caroline Dale

Solutions for Mining Wastewater Treatment

Get Your Ducks in a Row for ELG Compliance

optimizing mercury removal processes for industrial wastewaters

Selenium Reduction in Constructed Wetland Treatment Systems: Naturally Attenuating Problematic Pollutants

Sulfate Reducing Bioreactor for Sulfate, Metals and TDS Removal

ENV Professor: Dr. David W. Mazyck

Electro Biochemical Reactor (EBR) Technology for Treatment of Leach Pad Waters at the Landusky Mine

SELENIUM TREATMENT ARCH-EASTERN, BIRCH MINE WEST VIRGINIA MINE DRAINAGE TASK FORCE SYMPOSIUM. March 26, 2013

Biological Treatment of Groundwater Containing Perchlorate Using Fluidized Bed Reactors

Evaluation of Alternate Process Chemistries for the Removal of Arsenic and Fluoride from Industrial Wastewater

MEETING NEVADA DEP-BMRR PROFILE II PARAMETERS WITH ELECTROCOAGULATION BASED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS

ABSTRACT: Clean sampling and analysis procedures were used to quantify more than 70 inorganic chemical constituents (including 36 priority

Mercury Measure and Capture: PAC Injection in the WFGD. Michelle Brown, PE & Dr. Christine Valcarce McIIvaine Company Hot Topic Hour March 5, 2015

EPA Proposes New Standards to Regulate Water Discharges from Power Plants

Investigation of Mercury and Methyl Mercury Discharges from Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems at Four Coal-Fired Power Generation Facilities on the

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER

Biological Treatment for Hexavalent Chromium at the City of Davis

SELENIUM TREATMENT ARCH-EASTERN, BIRCH MINE WEST VIRGINIA MINE DRAINAGE TASK FORCE SYMPOSIUM. March 27, 2012

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

Selenium Removal from Scrubber Water VSEP RO membrane treatment for water reuse

Wet FGD Effluent Characterization in Preparation for WWT Technology Selection

Pilot Study Report. Z-92 Uranium Treatment Process

REINHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL Ltd NOx-Combustion-CCR Round Table Presentation. February 1 & 2, 2016, in Orlando, FL / Hosted by OUC

Ostara s Pond Water Treatment Goal: merging cost effective treatment with high water quality through resource recovery

W P C A. Worldwide Pollution Control Association. WPCA-Duke Energy FGD Wastewater Treatment Seminar March 7, Visit our website at

POWER FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION PILOT PROJECT AT A LARGE POWER PLANT. In the fall of 2015, the U.S. Environmental

Use of Electrochemical Iron Generation for Removing Heavy Metals from Contaminated Groundwater

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN REDUCING THIS TOXIC ELEMENT TO SAFE LEVELS

Survival Guide for the New Steam Electric Generating Effluent Guidelines

Modelling a water treatment plant using biological and physicochemical. Marc Laliberté Senior Process Engineer, Industrial Veolia

Saltworks Technologies

PILOT TESTING OF A BIOREACTOR FOR PERCHLORATE- CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT

Chemical Reduction processes for In Situ Soluble Metals Remediation and Immobilization in Groundwater

Environmentally Acceptable Treatment Options for FGD Wastewater

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Chemistry and Remediation of Arsenic

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

Experience with Mercury Compliance. Gary Blythe, Katherine Dombrowski, Gwen Eklund, Mandi Richardson

Approaches to Treatment of Very High Acidity Wastewater

Page 15 of 490. Appendix A: Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations Used in This Notice. EPA is proposing revisions to the effluent limitations

Evaluation and Selection of Technologies for the Removal of RDX from an Industrial Wastewater Stream

Innovative water technologies for maximum efficiency and profitability

Kashi Banerjee Ph.D.; P.E.; BCEE. Moon Township, PA Andrea Laybauer

OsmoBC Integrated Membrane Systems

Duke Energy Carolina LLC s Strategy and Initial Experience of FGD Waste Water Treatment Systems

Controlling Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Environmental Protection Agency Average of daily values for 30 consecutive days shall not exceed. Average of daily values for 30 consecutive

Navajo Generating Station Water Balance Model

Dynamic Waste Water Modeling for Coal Burning Power Plants

WASTEWATER FROM CARBON CAPTURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Passive Treatment System for Arsenic, Manganese, & Iron. Presented by, Neal Gallagher, Golder Associates Inc.

Disinfection By-Products

Full Scale Operation of GE ABMet Biological Technology for the Removal of Selenium from FGD Wastewaters

1556 by Georgius Agricola. In the United States 10,000 miles of streams and surface

Particulate and Opacity Control - Program 76

Practical Approaches to Meeting the Pending Steam Electric Power Effluent Guidelines for CCB Landfill Leachate

Zero Liquid Discharge Effluent Guidelines Compliance Strategies for Coal-Fired Power Plants FGD Wastewater

From Zero to Hero: Adoption of Zero Liquid Discharge across Industries

Catalytic Treatment of NDMA- and TCE-Contaminated Groundwater JSEM 2006

Pilot Testing of Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Technologies Using Brackish Ground Water for Inland Desert Communities

Advanced Technologies for Produced Water Treatment 2014 PERF Spring Meeting

Effluent Guidelines and Standards Program Update

Efficient Treatment of Complex Wastewaters at Umicore Precious Metals using Biotechnology

Peter Schauer Chris debarbadillo PNCWA 2009

SIMPLE FILTER CAPPING APPROACHES FOR ENAHANCED BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION PERFORMANCE. Andrew WT Wong, EIT, University of Waterloo*

PUBLIC INTEREST COMMENT

Integrated Environmental Controls - Program 75

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

MWUA 92 nd Annual February Meeting & Trade Show

Introduction. PTI provides proprietary chemicals and consulting to industrial manufacturers.

Solving Mine Water Problems with Peat-Based Sorption Media

Corrosion and Odor Control in Wastewater Systems

Ground Water Quality Report. Inorganic Ground Water Quality Time Series

Ground Water Quality Report. Inorganic Ground Water Quality Time Series

Presenters: Successes of The City of Calgary s Leachate Treatment Pilot Plant, and Use of Treated Leachate to Build a Greener Future 1

Full scale pilot test of a novel technology to remediate alkaline coal mine water using high-surface media at Acomb Mine Water Treatment Scheme, UK

PROCESS INTENSIFICATION A usual approach in water treatment for the chemical industry

Low Maintenance Passive Treatment Systems for Mining Site Contaminants. Robert C. Thomas, Ph.D

Transcription:

FGD Wastewater Treatment Evaluation Paul Chu EPRI 650 855 2362 pchu@epri.com McIlvaine Webcast August 15, 2013

Proposed EPA Numeric Limits (April 2013) FGD ELG Limits by Technology Option Daily Maximum Chemical Precipitation + Biological Monthly Average Arsenic g/l 8 6 Mercury ng/l 242 119 * Selenium g/l 16 10 Nitrate/Nitrite mg/l 0.17 0.13 ORSANCO, others considering a 12 ppt discharge limit Effluent Guidelines is an internal limit of 119 ppt 2

Treatment Strategy: Putting the Puzzle Together Selenium, nitrate drive core selection 1. Biological 2. Zero valent iron (ZVI), others phys/chem approaches? 3. ZLD: thermal, flue gas based Mercury, arsenic Possibly achieve with core technology Add polishing technology, if necessary 3

R&D Needs, i.e. Technology Gaps Cost-Effective, Reliable Technologies Selenium Treatment of selenate and other Se compounds Nitrate/nitrite Will current biological systems, ZVI meet limits? Mercury Evaluate various polishing adsorption media Arsenic Optimize current phys/chem systems Evaluate adsorption media developed in drinking water applications on FGD water Independent Evaluation of Treatment Technologies 4

Selenium, Nitrate/Nitrite Biological Treatment Several commercial biological treatment systems Much of the Duke data less than 10 ppb EPRI R&D: Evaluate alternative bioreactors, applied in non-power applications Ongoing pilots at eastern bituminous power plant Membrane bioreactor (MBR) Fluidized bed reactor (FBR) Manage untreated FGD water chemistry i.e. ORP, ph Concerns with coal switching, load swings Vertical flow wetlands Several pilot completed; 2 full-scale evaluations 5

FGD Water Variability Requires Management 6

Other Selenium Compounds Treatability Concern; Vertical Flow Wetland Study Se +4 Se +6 Measured Se Other Total Dissolved Se Sum of Se Species Unaccounted Se Influent 1730 154 39 1990 1923 67 Effluent 9 ND 10 94 19 75 What are these compounds, possibly: Se-S Se-organic Se-N Se-halide Planned lab studies to evaluate converting these Se compounds to more treatable forms 7

Selenium, Nitrate/Nitrite Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) Two 1-gpm pilots completed Generally met selenium, mercury, arsenic, nitrate targets Other selenium compounds: potential concern at 1 site Promising results warrant more studies on more FGD waters; every FGD water may be different Planned 1-gpm pilot at eastern bituminous site, parallel with pilot bioreactors Planned 50-gpm demo at Water Research Center (WRC) 8

Mercury Summary Reminder: Effluent Guidelines set internal limits; some regions/states considering more stringent discharge limits Strategy: Evaluate polishing treatment i.e. adsorption media EPRI working with technology vendors to conduct lab screening studies for mercury (and other trace elements) Various adsorption media, designer compounds show promise for further evaluation Planned pilot studies beginning this Fall 9

Arsenic Summary Will conventional phys/chem (lime desaturation plus ferric coprecipitation) achieve 6 and 8 ppb limits? Field studies to characterize speciation, total vs dissolved Planned lab studies to evaluate ideal ph Arsenic speciation: +3 vs +5, both may be present Most technologies (e.g. ferric) preferentially treat +5 +3 can easily be oxidized to +5, i.e., with Cl Will traditional arsenic media from groundwater/drinking applications extrapolate to FGD water? GFO (granular ferric oxide) GFH (granular ferric hydroxide) 10

Additional Planned Pilot Field Studies Encourage interested companies to participate Conduct additional pilot studies of promising approaches for these target pollutants Evaluate mercury, selenium, possibly arsenic AEP Amos: ~ 6 months of pilot tests 2 phases: upfront screening followed by longerterm testing Target start date ~October 13 2 nd FGD site (TBD) Target start data ~March 14 FGD Water Chemistry Will Likely Vary More Studies on More FGD Waters 11

Summary: Our Current Path Forward More stringent limits are almost here Treatment performance could be very site-specific Need more studies on more FGD waters Selenium/Nitrate Biological: pilot studies of promising technologies ZVI: 2 pilots completed; 2 more studies planned Mercury: planning pilot studies in Fall Arsenic: conducting lab evaluations with FGD Collaborative Effort with Interested Companies 12

Together Shaping the Future of Electricity 13